T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
124.1 | Insurance Coverage | USCTR1::RTRUEBLOOD | Rollyn Trueblood DTN 297-6553 | Thu Sep 27 1990 19:20 | 3 |
| Does the "war clause" in the our life insurance policy invalidate
the coverage?
|
124.2 | Soldiers & Sailors Civil Relief Act | USCTR1::RTRUEBLOOD | Rollyn Trueblood DTN 297-6553 | Thu Sep 27 1990 19:35 | 6 |
| The military leave policy appears to handle the payroll issue, however
doesn't the Soldiers & Sailors Civil Relief Act specify that an activated
service member when re-instated is provided all raises & promotions that
would have normally occurred during the period of active duty? A long term
leave of absence does not seem to apply.
|
124.3 | Curious | AKOV12::LORENTZEN | | Thu Sep 27 1990 21:16 | 10 |
| Hmmmm, the way that form is written up it is obviously intended as a
legal document. Any lawyers out there who could comment on whether
terms and conditions in such would supercede a statute such as the
Soldiers and Sailors Act?
I don't know how eager I would be to give up the benefits under the Act
in exchage for 13 weeks pay differential and medical coverage for the wife
for a year. That is, if that is indeed the case.
Len
|
124.4 | life insurance | CSS::VALCOURT | | Tue Nov 06 1990 20:56 | 12 |
| Could someone further elaborate on the Soldier's and Sailor's Act??
I've heard of it before but do not know what it states.. Also, re .1,
would our life insurance be invalidated?? It says in the "Agreement"
that:
"Digital further agrees to provide Employee and Employee
dependents with continued coverage for the period under
Digital's medical, dental, and life insurance programs...."
ken
|
124.5 | I could be wrong. | LVSB::GAGNON | Iraqnophobia...catch it! | Wed Nov 07 1990 12:46 | 12 |
| > "Digital further agrees to provide Employee and Employee
> dependents with continued coverage for the period under
> Digital's medical, dental, and life insurance programs...."
Someone correct me hear if I'm wrong. Your company must provide
you with the ability to maintain your present insurance. I believe
that the most that you have to pay is 102% of what the company pays.
Digital I believe is going to keep supplimenting your insurance
while your away.
Kevin
|
124.6 | Health Insurance | USCTR1::RTRUEBLOOD | Rollyn Trueblood DTN 297-6553 | Wed Nov 07 1990 13:57 | 24 |
| Someone correct me hear if I'm wrong. Your company must provide
you with the ability to maintain your present insurance. I believe
that the most that you have to pay is 102% of what the company pays.
Digital I believe is going to keep supplimenting your insurance
while your away.
*************************
The Internal Revenue Service ruled in IRS Bulletin 1990-40, 1 Oct 90,
that employers must continue health-care coverage for called-up
Reservists and their families if the Reservists so desire and if they
are willing to pay the premium for the coverage.
Background: The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act
of 1985 (COBRA) allows employees who leave their jobs for any reason
to continue being covered by their ex-employer's health plan, at their
own expense, for up to 18 months. The former employer may end the coverage
if the person and his or her family begin coverage under another group
health plan.
But the IRS has said that military health benefits (including
CHAMPUS) available to the families of activated Reservists are not a
"group health plan" as the IRS code defines it. Therefor, employers may
not stop health benefits to Reservists called to active duty or their
families without their consent.
Source- "The Officer" magazine November 1990 at Page 37
|
124.7 | what about life insurance?? | CSS::VALCOURT | | Wed Nov 07 1990 18:03 | 5 |
| That's fine about Health Insurance, but did it say anything about
Life Insurance??
ken
|
124.8 | War Clauses | 8713::J_BUTLER | USAR...and ready... | Wed Nov 07 1990 20:22 | 12 |
| Re Life Insurance...
Watch out for "War Clauses." Many policies will not pay benefits
for loss of life/limb due to hostile fire (with or without a
declaration of war.)
This would not affect life insurance policies continued for family
members remaining at home, just the folks getting in harm's way.
jb
|
124.9 | | LVSB::GAGNON | Iraqnophobia...catch it! | Thu Nov 08 1990 12:34 | 8 |
| Just a slightly different question regarding insurance. I have
Veterans group life insurance. Am I covered if something happens
to me while NOT in Training or Active duty? In other words, just
being a civy?
Thanks
Kevin
|
124.10 | Veterans Ins | USCTR1::RTRUEBLOOD | Rollyn Trueblood DTN 297-6553 | Thu Nov 08 1990 17:05 | 15 |
|
Just a slightly different question regarding insurance. I have
Veterans group life insurance. Am I covered if something happens
to me while NOT in Training or Active duty? In other words, just
being a civy?
???????
If you have Veterans Group Life you are essentially covered for
peacetime activities, however a call to your VA office may be necessary
to see about a war clause here.
If you have Serviceman's Group Life Ins (SGLI) you are covered for
active duty related injuries while on active duty. However, that is only
$50,000. That does not go very far if you are the only breadwinner. You
might consider one of the military industry insurance policies such
as USAA, GEICO, etc that cover military personnel with term insurance.
|
124.11 | | LVSB::GAGNON | Iraqnophobia...catch it! | Thu Nov 08 1990 18:04 | 8 |
| Thanks for the info.
I thought that if we are activated, we are classified as being on
active duty, and are covered if we are k*lled in the line of duty.
(perish the thought).
Kevin
|
124.12 | DEC pays no Life Insurance for death in "war" | CSS::VALCOURT | | Thu Nov 08 1990 19:23 | 5 |
| Just found out the you WILL NOT be covered under DEC's Life Insurance if
you die in battle. I guess that means that I have to find some
other Life insurance agency (I think USAA) to supplement this.
ken
|
124.13 | USAA "non war clausable" life insurance | CSS::VALCOURT | | Thu Nov 08 1990 19:44 | 8 |
| Just got off the phone with USAA. They have "non-war clausable " term
life insurance for $84/year (for $50K) and $128/year (for $100K)..
BTW, this insurance quote was for me, 26 yo and non-smoker. Anybody who
would like to talk to them, their number is 1-800-531-8000.
good luck,
Ken
|
124.14 | policy maximums | MSBCS::TARMEY | | Thu Nov 08 1990 19:44 | 8 |
| RE: .12
When I took out my first USAA policy, it was three weeks before I was
due to go 'cross the pond.....the one to the west. At that time (1967)
there was a maximum amount that they would write ($10K, I think).
Don't know if they have those limitations today.
Bill Tarmey
|
124.15 | | SSVAX::LEONHARDT | | Thu Nov 08 1990 21:46 | 4 |
| re -1 That was just for you, Bill. For the rest of us the amount
was a lot higher......
:-)
|
124.16 | back at ya' | MSBCS::TARMEY | | Fri Nov 09 1990 13:39 | 9 |
|
RE: Policy max
At that stage of my life, making my wife a wealthy widow was not in my
plans! $10K was a socially acceptable token........ :^)
Have great weekend,
Bill T.
|
124.17 | Dental "Gotcha" | USCTR1::RTRUEBLOOD | Rollyn Trueblood DTN 297-6553 | Fri Nov 09 1990 14:59 | 8 |
| There is one "gotcha" within the military medical system. Dental coverage for
family members is not automatic unless you live within commuting range of
a uniformed service medical facility. The dental insurance program,
abbreviated as (DELTA), is only offered to personnel enlisted for two years or
greater (or Voluntary Indef with officers).
The possibility of war was not considered when this dental plan was sold to the
active duty force.
|
124.18 | USAA ? | KYOA::SCHWARTZR | | Fri Nov 16 1990 19:16 | 12 |
|
re USAA insurance
I've got USAA renter's insurance, and I thought you had to be
an officer (not one of the "untouchables" EM/NCO types) to be
a member of USAA.
RANDY SCHWARTZ
Hope you guys/gals can take a joke, cause I use to be a
"untouchable", but as my First Sergeant says I was "untrainable".
|
124.19 | Life insurance | HAVOC::KENDRICK | | Tue Nov 20 1990 15:12 | 17 |
| I got additional life insurance for my husband through METPAY. It also
does not have the "Act of War" clause in it. That was one of the
specific questions asked and the agent told us that there aren't that
many companies around that offer that.
I also checked into getting insurance for him as my dependent and he
would not be covered if he was k*lled due to an "act of war".
Now my question is - Does war have to be declared for these types of
policies to be void - or just an act such as shooting? So far all of
the deaths in the crisis have been accidental - would they be covered
under these policies?
Thanks for any info.
bk
|
124.20 | Best to ask the Underwriters | USCTR1::RTRUEBLOOD | Rollyn Trueblood DTN 297-6553 | Tue Nov 20 1990 16:08 | 10 |
| Sending a letter to the underwriters at METPAY should give you the answer to
your unasked question,"Will METPAY provide coverage if my husband is killed
in an accident while on active duty?"
They should also be consulted about what they mean by "act of war". For
example, a few years ago a Korean jet was shot down by the Russians for
straying over their territory. Several insurance companies did not pay
their clients' families claiming this was an act of war. There were
Dec Employees on that plane; Dec paid.
|
124.21 | War Clause... | 8713::J_BUTLER | USAR...and ready... | Tue Nov 20 1990 17:47 | 11 |
| As was explained to me during one of many "personal benefits"
briefings on active duty, if your policy has a "war clause,"
your benefits will NOT be paid if your demise is directly or
indirectly attributable to hostilities. An "accident" in a war zone
is considered "indirectly" attributable to hostilities.
The best thing is to try to get a policy without a "war clause."
USAA offers some, as do some other companies...but starting one
now may mean higher premiums...
John B.
|
124.22 | USAA vs USLICo | MSBCS::TARMEY | | Tue Nov 20 1990 18:45 | 17 |
| RE: USAA
Having just paid my insurance premium to USAA, this topic came to mind.
Regardless of what I said in a previous reply, I don't think USAA
writes Life Insurance......Do they? I have my Auto Insurance with
them, I know they do Home Owners, but I'm not sure about Life.
They Company that I got my first $10K through was USLICo, out of
Washington, DC. In both cases (USAA and USLICo), the US stands for
United Services, but the two are (were?) completely independent. In
1965, one of them - not sure which - was for Military Officers only.
Don't know about today.
Sorry if I added to the confusion.
Bill T.
|
124.23 | what about a weekend drill?? | CSS::VALCOURT | | Tue Nov 20 1990 21:37 | 4 |
| Does DEC life insurance cover you for death resulting on a weekend
drill??
|
124.24 | A Couple of Partial Answers | USCTR1::RTRUEBLOOD | Rollyn Trueblood DTN 297-6553 | Thu Nov 22 1990 19:33 | 9 |
| Once upon a time, I asked that question. The answer then, 8 years ago, was yes.
However nothing remains constant.
USAA does life insurance, and they have subsidiaries that insure others than
uniformed services officers. Co-incidentally USAA was the only American firm
that would insure my sailboat for international coverage while I was stationed
in Europe.
|
124.25 | Another Question | HEIDI::KENDRICK | | Mon Nov 26 1990 15:59 | 18 |
| I must have been misunderstood. METPAY will cover acts of war -
meaning they do not have a clause in their insurance. That's why we
got it - but Digital does have a clause (dependents anyways).
I spoke to my husband about this topic and some things said in here
about SGLI. I told him that it was said he is not covered by SGLI
unless he is on active duty. He says that is not true - that the
soldiers pay for that insurance and it is for "life" in general no
matter where you are. He said that he has asked this question to his
unit a number of times and has always got the same answer - yes you are
covered whether on active or nonactive.
Could someone clarify this?
Thanks,
BK
|
124.26 | covered at all times | A1VAX::BOHRER | | Tue Nov 27 1990 13:45 | 18 |
| re:.25
> I spoke to my husband about this topic and some things said in here
> about SGLI. I told him that it was said he is not covered by SGLI
> unless he is on active duty. He says that is not true - that the
> soldiers pay for that insurance and it is for "life" in general no
> matter where you are. He said that he has asked this question to his
> unit a number of times and has always got the same answer - yes you are
> covered whether on active or nonactive.
> Could someone clarify this?
If he is a drilling reservist paying the $4.00 a month for SGLI
insurance he is covered at all times 24 hours a day 365 days a year. This
information comes from 20 years in the Reserves.
Ed Bohrer
|
124.27 | Thanks | HEIDI::KENDRICK | | Tue Nov 27 1990 17:07 | 6 |
| re -.1
Thanks for the info.
BK
|
124.28 | Quick Reaction Force Glitch | USCTR1::RTRUEBLOOD | Rollyn Trueblood DTN 297-6553 | Mon Dec 10 1990 18:34 | 12 |
| A new gotcha is happening. Some of my friends here are in Quick Reaction
Force units; you know "12-hours-after-being-alerted-you-are-on-a-plane-and-
its-wheels-are-UP".
The Digital Policy says a copy of order's has to be in hand. However,
in Q.R.F. units, written orders do not catch up with you for two weeks or
longer. Other employers are experiencing the same problem.
I wonder if Dec Personnel has some sort of provision such as formal letters
from individual's commanding officers, perhaps a Flag Officer, advising
DEC of an employee's Q.R.F. status, etc?
|