T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
515.1 | Nope | MAMTS5::MWANNEMACHER | let us pray to Him | Thu Sep 27 1990 09:41 | 9 |
| My response is no.
I am a male and am 30 years old.
**Let us all base our decisions with the knowledge that we are not
married. For those of us who are, we will also respond as if we were
single.
|
515.2 | | FORTY2::BOYES | Les still has his terrible fear of chives! | Thu Sep 27 1990 10:06 | 6 |
| No - male - straight - unmarried - 22.
I think we have a biased sample here, not to say that the original survey wasn't
(it was in the UK by the way, and I don't know how it was conducted: an
anonymous phone poll would probably produce different results to interviewing
bunches of 18 year old 'lads' down the pub).
|
515.3 | | NRUG::MARTIN | Lets turn this MUTHA OUT! | Thu Sep 27 1990 10:14 | 9 |
| Nope. 26- male
I was brought up by nuns, so that might have something to do with it.
My wife and I did not make love until we were married....FWIW.
also, in this day and age, with all of the deseases (sexually
transmitted types) it would be rather immature and downright dangerous
to practice unsafe sexual "bar hopping".....
|
515.4 | | HANNAH::MODICA | | Thu Sep 27 1990 10:24 | 9 |
|
Hi Mike W. I'm glad you started this. I remember the note in another
topic and though I didn't respond to it, I found the generalization
of it insulting to men.
My answer is NO! Then I'd tell her to get lost.
I'm married and 37.
Hank
|
515.5 | NO WAY!!! | BTOVT::MUNROE_R | I'll give it a whirl! | Thu Sep 27 1990 10:29 | 4 |
| NO WAY-- I'm single, female, and 24.
I find it difficult to believe that anyone who thinks like an adult
would.
|
515.8 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | No artificial sweeteners | Thu Sep 27 1990 11:03 | 6 |
| Gee- I guess I'm a minority. ;^)
If I were unmarried and a suitable woman came up to me on the streets, I
would probably agree to a sexual encounter.
Male- 27.
|
515.9 | Period! | MORO::BEELER_JE | In harm's way... | Thu Sep 27 1990 11:15 | 5 |
| Single, male, over 39.
NO.
Jerry
|
515.10 | We all go to church on Sunday too... | CYCLST::DEBRIAE | To Report ALL Hate Crimes Dial: 1-800-347-HATE | Thu Sep 27 1990 11:23 | 4 |
|
This is ridiculous. Who the heck is going to say "yes" in public,
especially in our ultra-Puritanistic NE area?
|
515.11 | no and yes | ASDS::BARLOW | Care to tango? | Thu Sep 27 1990 11:35 | 12 |
|
Now, even if I weren't married, I'd say no, thank you! Although,
in my college days there was exactly this situation and we'd
arranged to meet for just this type of "no-strings" encounter.
I backed out a week before. (of course, I'd known this man since
childhood and we'd always had the hots for one another.) So
perhaps the college mentality is different from the 'adult'
mentality.
Female, 23. (college life ended almost 3 years ago, for me)
Rachael
|
515.12 | Just happened to me recently (cough, cough..) | FRAMBO::LIESENBERG | Just order a drink, Tantalus! | Thu Sep 27 1990 11:36 | 41 |
| No. Male. 27.
Additionally, I'd tell her I find the offer quite flattering, but she
ought to consider going to an analyst to find out what's missing...
Oh well, my opinion is that taking time to get to know the other person
adds both excitement and quality to sex. It doesn't depend on time,
just on the feeling you have to feel personally very close to the other
person. Sometimes it takes more time, sometimes it happens quite fast.
I could never stomach one night stands, and I'll never fall for the
trap of pure physical attraction again. It made me feel absolutely
miserable and physically sick the next morning. Never ever again.
More statistic data of interest:
* It's proven that quite a lot of men would make love to a woman just
for physical reasons. That's not debatable, I think we're addressing
the wrong test persons for reliable stats in here...men are rather the
ones tending to promiscuity (how do you explain the whole collection of
"men's" mags and movies otherwise?)...
* I grew up in a beach ressort that is 10 miles from a big city, and
which is very "lively" in the summer. We (I was about 18 back
then) were discussing this subject in our group (boys and girls) while
lying at the beach in the sun, stating that "boys" are faster starters
and would have sex with almost every good-looking woman, and someone
said the girls were quite the same but were afraid of living it out. To
clear the discussion, and really just out of pschological interest, we
made our own survey, approaching young girls either at the beach or in
some disco and politely asking what they'd say if we asked them to
spend the night with us. The result was that only about 5% showed some
interest, even in a "love"-friendly environment like the beach in the
summer in vacation time, when people are out for fun. And it was not
that some of the guys had much more positive answers than others, which
just shows you that if someone thinks that way, he or she isn't very
selective... Anyway, I spent some of the most emabarassing days of my
life during our "research" work...
Interestingly, back then most of us said, yeah, we'd make love to a
good looking woman out of pure fun. Fortunately, time made me wiser...
...Paul
|
515.13 | | DASXPS::HENDERSON | Got some things to talk about | Thu Sep 27 1990 11:41 | 12 |
| No. Male. Straight. 40
I don't think I would have said yes even when I was younger. I have never been
able to think of sex with someone without some degree of love or emotional
attachment.
Jim
|
515.14 | loose-loose | CSC32::HADDOCK | All Irk and No Pay | Thu Sep 27 1990 11:52 | 6 |
| Male, 37, straight, Picese, 6'0", shoe size 9, 225 lbs of still more
linebacker than not thanks to my latest "hobby".
Twice yes, three times no. And I hated myselfe afterwards--for all
of them. ;^). You just can't win.
fred();
|
515.15 | | FRAIS3::HIRSCH | | Thu Sep 27 1990 11:56 | 5 |
| Sure. Male. 25.
Never heard of Casanova-syndromes? Men can't escape it. It's what
nature dictates. They can be reasonable and suppress it. But if they'd
listen to their body and instincts, they'd go fot it.
|
515.16 | | VAXUUM::KOHLBRENNER | | Thu Sep 27 1990 12:07 | 5 |
| That's a flattering offer, but no thanks.
(Same reply to an attractive person of the same sex.)
Male, 54. Bill
|
515.17 | Really Not What I Meant
| GLITER::STHILAIRE | Food, Shelter & Diamonds | Thu Sep 27 1990 12:14 | 36 |
| Re .0, I think you started this topic in response to a
comment I made in Lisa whathername harrassment string. When
I made the comment that I thought most men loved "empty
physical encounters" or whatever it was. (I can't even
remember exactly what the phrase was now!)
I was not referring to a situation as cold and abrupt as
walking up to a stranger, or having a stranger walk up to you,
and propose sex. I think most women would consider this too
dangerous no matter how attractive the man might be. My first
thought would be that either the guy was drunk, was making fun
of me or was a crazed homocidal maniac who intended to murder me,
cut me up into little pieces and leave me by the roadside!
I also find it interesting that when *I* said that I thought most
men enjoyed empty physical encounters that .0 turned it around
and had the *woman* propositioning the man! .0, I would just like
you to know that I have never propositioned a man (as far as initial
contact with the person goes), in my life and I'm almost 41 yrs. old.
I don't even know why I feel the need to make .0 realize that I'm
not a tramp, but I seem to. Probably an affect from having grown
up under the double standard. Nice girls don't. Or they at least
wait and let the guys do the propositioning.
I wasn't even really talking about one night stands. What I was talking
about is that I think that most men have sex with a lot of women they
don't particularly care about, although sometimes they pretend they
do for a couple of weeks. They put a thin veneer of romance over it,
date a woman for a month or so, have sex with her a few times, and
move on. I consider that an empty encounter and men do it all the
time and seem to enjoy it. At least that's been my experience.
However, if you don't feel it applies to you then why take offense?
Lorna
|
515.20 | | SELECT::APODACA | That'll be...just fine. | Thu Sep 27 1990 12:24 | 7 |
| Nope. F, 25, single.
The short term pleasure ain't worth the long term risk.
Now, if it were more than one date, quite possibly yes.
|
515.21 | | GLITER::STHILAIRE | Food, Shelter & Diamonds | Thu Sep 27 1990 12:30 | 11 |
| Re .19, I know he didn't specify, but the point is that initially I said
that I thought most men enjoyed empty physical encounters. That is
not the same thing as saying that if a strange woman walked up to
a man on the street and propositioned him that he would say, Yes!
I don't think most men would say yes to a strange woman who walked
up to them on the street and propositioned them because the
situation is too weird. That's not the way we normally arrange
our sexual encounters.
Lorna
|
515.23 | | TLE::FISHER | Work that dream and love your life | Thu Sep 27 1990 12:49 | 10 |
|
If a man came up to me and asked me to have sex with him, and if I was
in the mood and felt the "go" feelings, then, yes, I'd do it. (Keep
in mind that I am also the type of person who has said no to great-
looking guys because I was hungry and would rather have eaten dinner.)
I'm single, male, and 29 years-old.
--Gerry
|
515.24 | Is this "'good' people don't" or "Sex is bad" again? | CYCLST::DEBRIAE | To Report ALL Hate Crimes Dial: 1-800-347-HATE | Thu Sep 27 1990 12:57 | 20 |
|
I hate to add more to this "everybody behaves like we learned in
Sunday School" string but I'll add my stats...
No. Male. 25.
This comes from personal experience from having learned what
personally works for me (like preferring a monogamous relationship).
I do not do either of the two because local Puritan norms dictated
it to me. I know many people who prefer non-monogamous relationships
and who truly enjoy sexual encounters without the dating game, etc.
This personally works best for them and even if they are only 1 in
200 (which has not been my experience), what's the point?
Not everybody approaches sexuality and relationships the same way.
Nor should they. Different things work for different people. So
what's the point here? Curious...
-Erik
|
515.26 | | SWAM3::BROWN_RO | surf's up! | Thu Sep 27 1990 14:37 | 12 |
| Yes, and I'd go get condoms, too. Male, age 38.
Why not, if I don't have a commitment to someone else? It might be
the opening opportunity for a great relationship.
Human relationships are endlessly variable. Trying to follow a strict
set of behavioral rules won't make a great relationship happen; it may
simply deny the possiblity of one happening. I've had good
relationships that started off with sex on the first date.
-roger
|
515.27 | | BTOVT::THIGPEN_S | ridin' the Antelope Freeway | Thu Sep 27 1990 14:40 | 4 |
| female, straight, no way at any age, even before I was married, even in
my hoyden youth
Get a grip - who's in charge, you or your gonads?
|
515.28 | | SWAM3::BROWN_RO | surf's up! | Thu Sep 27 1990 14:45 | 8 |
| re: 27 Who's in charge?
I am.
Doesn't mean that I can't enjoy my sexuality.
-roger
|
515.29 | Here we go again - "I'm Catholic and you should be too." | CYCLST::DEBRIAE | To Report ALL Hate Crimes Dial: 1-800-347-HATE | Thu Sep 27 1990 15:05 | 17 |
|
> Get a grip - who's in charge, you or your gonads?
Oh, wonderful job of avoiding judgement there. I can see others
equally judging you with "Get a grip - who's in charge, you or
your repressive upbringing?" or "Who's in charge, you or society?"
Some people think any sex at all is disgusting, some people think
sex is as enjoyable and non-committing as a simple back massage,
others think sex is good but demands marriage, and there's a whole
bunch of people in between.
Lay off the judgement, *both* ways. Do what works for YOU and quit
judging what works for others. Thank you...
-Erik
|
515.33 | i've never seen so many liars in one note | BLITZN::BERRY | More bad golfers play with PINGS. | Thu Sep 27 1990 16:21 | 14 |
| If I wasn't in a serious relationship... and this was before aids...
the answer would be YES, but on my terms. I don't know her so I can't
completely trust her. But I'm a Scorpio and we thrive on good sex!
Male, 34.
-dwight
Any to those who judge me... I'll just use these same old, worn out,
tiresome, stupid phrases that you'd probably use....
"Get a life! Get a grip! Get a clue!"
How ____ing original.... how cool.... yeah, right.
|
515.34 | | DUGGAN::MAHONEY | | Thu Sep 27 1990 16:33 | 5 |
| to .3
Great!
If there were more human beings like you it would be a lot less
problems around... free sex these days, with so many dangers seems to me
like "free suicide".
|
515.35 | excuse me, could you repeat that | ORCAS::MCKINNON_JA | Trained by Professionals | Thu Sep 27 1990 16:39 | 5 |
| Have I, yup. Will I, probably....... have to feel it out at the time
of offering....
37 s/w/m
|
515.36 | Another 'yes' reply... | AIAG::LUTZ | | Thu Sep 27 1990 19:06 | 13 |
| Sure.
Have I? Nope. Would I? I think so. Depends on the situation.
If I were not in a serious relationship with someone, and if we took
the proper safety/health precautions, I think it could be great.
But I too like the 'first date' analogy better. If a woman came up
to me out of the blue, I'd have at least a moment of "Wait -- what's
going on here?" :-)
Scott -- male, straight, 27, single
|
515.37 | No ... well, maybe. | JOKUR::CIOTO | | Thu Sep 27 1990 19:44 | 15 |
| No, sort of. Well... maybe. Male - Single - 35 years old
I honestly couldn't say how I would react until the person/situation
presented itself to me. My first inclination would be to say no, due
to prospect of contracting diseases. Also, in such an encounter,
it is unlikely there would be a spark of closeness/caring. If there
weren't that spark, I would say no. If there were, then maybe I
would go for it. It's hard to say.
By the way, thank you for entering this topic. I think the results
here may surprise women (and even a lot of men) who believe that most
men go after "empty" physical experiences (whatever that means).
Paul
|
515.38 | | AV8OR::TATISTCHEFF | my brother likes him... | Fri Sep 28 1990 01:40 | 7 |
| unmarried white female 27
on a first date - like a shot.
random gorgeous stranger - not without an introduction, thanks.
lee
|
515.39 | man vs beast...the eternal fight in us... | FRAMBO::LIESENBERG | Just order a drink, Tantalus! | Fri Sep 28 1990 04:57 | 56 |
| .24 + .29
...great replies. I was just waiting for people starting to reproach
their answers to each other. Why intelligent, nice people always start
thinking they hold the only clue to the secrets of a fulfilled life
when it comes to subjects as this one is something I could never
fathom...
additional info to my reply in .12:
The girls made their own survey, but had to give it up quite fast
because it became downright dangerous to them... almost 90% of the young
lads they asked were all for it, and they'd settled down to business then
and there.
I think most men would go for a physical experience. It's somehow part
of our genetic programm to spread our genes as widely as possible. I
think that whoever says "no! and I NEVER EVER would have done it!" is
not being honest...
My "no" is based on my personal experience, on knowing that having sex
without caring for the other person always made me feel sick (I can
recall vomiting for half of the next morning...). Now I know it doesn't
work for me, and I'd say "let's take some time..", but I know I'd have
to fight to keep my principles up, for the ape in me would be yelling
"yeah, yeah, go for it!".
Right now I'm in a situation that is the perfect fertile soil in order
to fall for misconceived physical attraction. I've given up a long-time
relationship, and I have a woman who is being a very close friend to me
in this difficult time. Last week, we had been talking and drinking
some good wine and listening to music in my flat, and when it got
later, and your defense starts to drop, I felt the urge to kiss her.
She said: "Listen, Paul, you know I'm in love with you, and I'd go
wherever you take me. But if YOU don't love me, you'd be just
destroying a wonderful chance we have for the future, for tomorrow you
couldn't look into my eyes...Please, THINK!"... She knows me quite well,
and she was wise. So I told her to please leave me alone, for even
though I care for her a lot more than just for a friend, I know it's
still not enough to avoid making me feel guilty for having used her as
"sexual therapy" for one night. It'd represent destroying our
friendship, too...
As you can see, it's easy even for someone with principles to get very
close to the edge were he could just forget them. Situations develop
their own dynamic, and you can't tell how you'd react...
I'd say "no" to sex on the first date, for I know I'm a romantic
featherhead that mixes up love, physical attraction and liking when
I'm in the "right" mood. But it takes two, and it takes being open and
saying what and why you want, in order to try to avoid making some
irreparable mistake at the start of a relationship.
But that's MY clue. And I'll never say it's the only one. It just works
for me.
...Paul
|
515.40 | Yes | TMCUK2::NAIK | Man with the Eastern Charm | Fri Sep 28 1990 07:29 | 6 |
| Male, 40 and married.
This has happened to me in past. And I have said "Yes" then. Ofcourse
they were pretty women.
girish
|
515.41 | | SA1794::CHARBONND | scorn to trade my place | Fri Sep 28 1990 09:14 | 3 |
| no,male,36
|
515.42 | Relax | MAMTS5::MWANNEMACHER | let us pray to Him | Fri Sep 28 1990 09:50 | 11 |
| Lorna,
I cannot possibly see how the base note could be construed as a
personal attack on you, believe me it wasn't. I made it as neutral as
possible, please reread it. Sorry if you were offended, but if you were
it was by yourself, not by the base note.
Peace,
Mike
|
515.43 | Such drama... | TLE::FISHER | Work that dream and love your life | Fri Sep 28 1990 12:05 | 11 |
|
> ... free sex these days, with so many dangers seems to me
> like "free suicide".
Oh, pul-lease, Louise. Stop the violin music.
Choose sex acts that don't transmit HIV (yes, there are some good ones
left), or put a rubber on it. It's that simple.
--Ger
|
515.44 | I'll never forget it.. | UNXA::PERCIACCANTE | | Fri Sep 28 1990 12:06 | 27 |
| male, 47
Some time ago a similar situation happened to me. I was approached by a
female co-worker who suggested we engage in recreational sex. No
strings attached. We could get together whenever both parties were free.
No hard feelings if one party had to say no. No explanations were
required.
I am not the kind of person to have sex with someone I had just met.. in
a bar, for example. But I knew this woman. We had often engaged in the
usual humorous banter (with no sexual over tones) that takes place in the
office. While I recognized there were several risks in "fooling around" with
someone who really was a stranger, I said YES! I guess we got together
about once every two or three weeks. This situation lasted about
nine months at which time I changed jobs and geographic area. While it
lasted ..WE had a GREAT time.
I often think fondly of the lady and the situation. I must say that over
that period of time we (I) had grown quite close (I think that's called
bonding) and even skipped the sex once or twice (my suggestion not
hers) and just did something more typical of a date. Under similar
circumstances, (no strings, someone I knew and liked) I would do the
same thing. Why not?
Bob
|
515.45 | Without love? | ICS::BELMORE | | Fri Sep 28 1990 13:01 | 17 |
|
Female, 19.
I've done it before, and it wasn't a bad experience, BUT
I would never do it again.... Why? Because I have found sex
to be alot better when you're in love with the person. My opinion,
of course. It's better, I think because I feel so comfortable with
my boyfriend. He feels the same. Another reason I wouldn't do
it now is because of disease. What I liked about it, was the
spontaniety of the encounter. Still, I wouldn't do it again.
-Jennifer
|
515.46 | | DNEAST::FOOTER_JOE | Happiness is a smokin' Python | Fri Sep 28 1990 13:50 | 4 |
| Male, 45
You bet.
|
515.47 | who knows, he may even stick around.... | CRATE::CROSSLEY | What a stupid personal name! | Fri Sep 28 1990 14:21 | 6 |
|
If he was *REALY* good looking, and waved a condom at me, then most
definately.
Ian.
|
515.48 | results tab'd so far | BTOVT::THIGPEN_S | ridin' the Antelope Freeway | Fri Sep 28 1990 14:39 | 8 |
| male female
--------------------------------------------|
yes | 13 | 2 |
--------------------------------------------|
no | 10 | 5 |
--------------------------------------------|
undecided | 2 | 0 |
--------------------------------------------|
|
515.49 | maybe you should relax yourself | WRKSYS::STHILAIRE | Food, Shelter & Diamonds | Fri Sep 28 1990 15:08 | 16 |
| re .42, Mike, *sigh* I can't see how the base note could be construed
as a personal attack against me either! That's probably why I never
said it was. What are you talking about?
I did, however, make the comment that inspired you to start the
basenote because you took exception to what I had said. It's obvious
to me me that you and I see many things differently and the tone of
your note caused me to feel that I wanted explain myself a little
better, but I never once felt that I had been personally attacked.
Only now I have no idea why you thought that I thought that you had!
Oh, well....
Lorna
|
515.50 | sounds dangerous.... | WRKSYS::STHILAIRE | Food, Shelter & Diamonds | Fri Sep 28 1990 15:12 | 10 |
| re .44, the only problem, for me, in that type of situation, is that
after awhile I would either fall in love or lose interest in the sex
because I hadn't fallen in love. It would become pointless after
awhile. In fact, I find myself wondering if the experience was as
fulfilling for her as it was for you. I find myself wondering if she
was in love with you. Maybe she was and was heartbroken when you
switched jobs.
Lorna
|
515.51 | | CVG::THOMPSON | Aut vincere aut mori | Fri Sep 28 1990 15:38 | 5 |
| male, 37
No way no how.
Alfred
|
515.52 | As long as we're putting people through this pressure... | CYCLST::DEBRIAE | To Report ALL Hate Crimes Dial: 1-800-347-HATE | Fri Sep 28 1990 15:48 | 7 |
|
I think a far more interesting statistc rather than just "No,
never" or "Yes, often" is the much more intriguing question...
WHY???
-Erik
|
515.54 | Here's where I got the idea-note .17 | MAMTS5::MWANNEMACHER | let us pray to Him | Fri Sep 28 1990 16:02 | 23 |
| Lorna,
I guess it was you saying the following:
"I also find it interesting that when *I* said that I thought most men
enjoyed empty physical encounters that .0 (I guess meaning me :'))
turned it around and had the *woman* propositioning the man! .0, I
would just like you to know that I have never propositioned a man (as
far as initial contact with the person goes), in my life and I am
almost 40 years old.
I don't even know why I feel the need to make .0 feel that I'm not a
tramp, but I seem to."
I'd say that this gave me a slight indication that you thought I was
attacking you. What I was trying to do was to do a survey of mennotes
noters to see if we achieved similar results as you cited in the
survey.
Peace,
Mike
|
515.55 | | GLITER::STHILAIRE | Food, Shelter & Diamonds | Fri Sep 28 1990 16:39 | 20 |
| re Mike W., oh, no, I hadn't taken it as a personal attack, I was
just trying to explain my feelings.
re Mike Z., but I was replying to the guy in .44 who had written
about the relationship he had once with a co-worker. That wasn't
a 1-night stand.
re .0, the way the basenote is stated I would have to say, No.
If a strange man walked up to me somewhere and propositioned
me I would either think he was some kind of a wise-*ss or I'd
be afraid he was a murderer or something.
Even 1-night stands don't usually happen like that! They're
usually the result of two people spending *some* time together
talking for awhile first, and then sort of spontaneously
deciding to spend the night together.
I think the first date scenario is a better question, too.
Lorna
|
515.56 | | XCUSME::QUAYLE | i.e. Ann | Sun Sep 30 1990 22:23 | 28 |
|
Female, married, 42. No.
Re .48:
Male % Female %
Yes 13 52 2 25
No 10 40 6 75
Undecided 2 8 0 0
Total 25 100 8 100
Did I mention I'm taking Intro to Statistics? Actually it's taken me
so far, but I'm working at it.
:)
aq
|
515.57 | LYLE::LOVETT, 26 and rising, No? | FORTY2::BOYES | Les still has his terrible fear of chives! | Mon Oct 01 1990 05:38 | 12 |
|
"Given that true intellectual and emotional compatibiltity are at the very least
difficult, if not impossible to come by, we could always opt for the more
*temporal* gratification of sheer physical attraction...
"That wouldn't make you a *shallow* person.
"Would it ?"
--- Lyle Lovett, "Here I Am" 1989 :-)
|
515.58 | | CSS::MSMITH | I am not schizo, and neither am I. | Mon Oct 01 1990 15:54 | 5 |
| If I were single:
No / male / 43
Mike
|
515.59 | | GWYNED::YUKONSEC | Leave the poor nits in peace! | Mon Oct 01 1990 16:18 | 8 |
| No. No. No.
I don't think so.
Seriously, if I just want physical satisfaction, I can....well, er,
impair my eyesight.
female, 3(gulp)3, single.
|
515.60 | | TLE::FISHER | Work that dream and love your life | Mon Oct 01 1990 19:56 | 8 |
|
> WHY???
Because, if I'm in the mood, safe, and not "using" anyone, it is
exciting, it is fun, and it feels good.
--Ger
|
515.61 | one reason | WMOIS::B_REINKE | We won't play your silly game | Mon Oct 01 1990 22:21 | 5 |
| --Ger
for most women, because they'd risk being regarded as 'sluts'.
BJ
|
515.62 | confidence? | OLYMP::BENZ | Service(d) with a smile | Tue Oct 02 1990 07:32 | 9 |
| why not? Has happend, might happen again.
Btw, could be the beginning of a exiting relationship.
(Male, 45)
Heinrich
(who does not express relationships in numbers (such as shoe-size and
other performance date (hi...mike))) :-)
|
515.63 | | FORTY2::BOYES | Les still has his terrible fear of chives! | Tue Oct 02 1990 07:39 | 3 |
| > Btw, could be the beginning of a exiting relationship.
Freudian slip ? :-)
|
515.64 | | WMOIS::SMITH_S | | Tue Oct 02 1990 07:43 | 7 |
|
female, 25
no, my boyfriend would kill me!
|
515.65 | He'd be dead meat. | MAMTS2::TTAYLOR | I'm in the mood ... | Tue Oct 02 1990 14:13 | 9 |
| Hi Mike:
Female (as you know), 28 yo.
If a man came up to me and proposed sex, I'd slug him and pray he
learned his lesson. Then, being the queen of the sarcastic one-liners
that I *am*, I'd muster a scathing comment, I'm sure.
Tammi
|
515.66 | Smile... | LEDDEV::CALABRIA | type dirty to me | Tue Oct 02 1990 14:50 | 8 |
|
Walked away from more than I've ever had, depends
on the situation at hand. Before I answered either
way, I'd look around for Alan Funt, and his Candid
Camera crew though...
-sj
|
515.67 | a liddle humor | GRANMA::MWANNEMACHER | let us pray to Him | Tue Oct 02 1990 16:17 | 8 |
| RE: Tammi. And if I were the guy I'd say something like, "Does that
mean no?":')
Peace,
Mike
|
515.68 | | NITTY::DIERCKS | Bent, in a straight world... | Tue Oct 02 1990 19:46 | 9 |
|
Greg, 34, single, gay
If he was "my type", and I was currently not involved with someone,
very probably -- it'd depend on my mood and how much time I had and
where we were, etc.
|
515.69 | The road not taken....? | UNXA::PERCIACCANTE | | Thu Oct 04 1990 15:09 | 6 |
| re .50
Our was a relationship that grew beyond just sex. I don't think she was
in love with me or I with her but clearly the relationship was still
growing and were circumstances different....who knows? As I said I
often think fondly of the lady...and wonder what her current
circumstances might be. Ever wish you could turn back time??
|
515.70 | Probably | HYSTER::DELISLE | | Fri Oct 05 1990 17:24 | 12 |
| If a man came up to me, to whom I were attracted, if I were single and
in the mood, I would probably say yes. IN my younger days that is,
when I tended not to think too much about these things. The basenotes
says nothing about him having to be a stranger, simply that there would
be no strings attached.
As a matter of fact I had a relationship of this nature many years ago.
Unfortunately, the man became a bit too attached, and began reading
"love" into the relationship where it did not exist.
Married (happily) female 39
|
515.71 | | OXNARD::HAYNES | Charles Haynes | Fri Oct 05 1990 18:26 | 25 |
| > If a very attractive person of the gender which you are attracted to came up
> to you and proposed sex with no strings attached, [what] would be your
> response?
This is clearly an over simplified scenario, rife with the potential for
misunderstanding and misinterpretation. Reading into it what I want to read
(as most people have done) I'll say:
I'm attracted to people not genders. If someone I was attracted to came up
and proposed sex "no strings attached" I might well say yes. If I were single,
it would be even more likely. If it were "strings attached" it would be even
more likely, depending on the strings. (For example *I* would want to "lay
some ground rules" if that's "strings attached" then I would want to attach
some strings. If I couldn't talk about these "strings" with the person I
would NOT have sex with them. Things like STDs, pregnancy, my relationship
with them, and so on.)
> Also please state whether you are a male or female and your age.
Male. 33.
I was going to put in a long diatribe about hidden agendas and the dangers of
self-selected sample populations in sociological surveys, but the hell with it.
-- Charles
|
515.72 | Don't like to close doors | CSMET2::PRUYN | Kris[topher] Pruyn []=optional | Fri Oct 05 1990 19:05 | 26 |
| Male - married (2 yrs) - 28 It would be conditional
I would probably say yes, but make sure there was at least
a little time to assess the situation. There is always time
to back out.
When I was single, I was interested in meeting women and
getting to know them. A woman who would make such an approach
has an individual personality like everyone else and it's worth
spending a little time to explore. Especially since I was not
good at introducing myself to women. Back then, I would not
condemn or judge, but be careful and enjoy life. Today, if I
were not happily married I would do the same.
BTW- I had an experience that doesn't exactly fit this scenario.
I went with friends and friends of friends skiing for the weekend.
A woman I had not previusly met approached me as soon as I arrived
at the condo. She didn't suggest we have sex, but started a
conversation that ended in bed a few hours (and yes drinks) later.
I was very impressed by her. Not so much physically, but emotionally,
intellectually. Anyway, about 2.5 years later, we got married. And
this year our son had his first birthday. He is THE most wonderful
thing that has ever happened to me and I sure would hate to have
missed out on it.
re .69: Yes, sometimes. But only cuase its goin' by tooooo fast!
|
515.73 | | SX4GTO::HOLT | Oy, its so humid! | Sat Oct 06 1990 13:42 | 9 |
|
I am a man, 38, single for 8 years.
Not enough data... I agree with Charles in that its a people
attraction, not a biological reaction..
Its one thing to appreciate an attractive female, but another to
put oneself into the vulnerable position of a physical connection..
|
515.74 | | FORTY2::BOYES | Les still has his terrible fear of chives! | Mon Oct 08 1990 05:10 | 5 |
| I don't think 'no strings attached' should be a condition of the question, as
there's no way of telling this intuitively. I've been told that in most one
night stands, one of the partners was hoping that it wouldn't be a one night
stand. "Fatal Attraction Syndrome".
|
515.75 | | WRKSYS::STHILAIRE | Food, Shelter & Diamonds | Tue Oct 09 1990 17:40 | 4 |
| re .60, I gotta admit, those are pretty convincing reasons. :-)
Lorna
|
515.76 | | BTOVT::BAGDY_M | I'm the Lord of the Wastelands | Wed Oct 10 1990 11:58 | 7 |
|
No ! Physical feeling just isn't enough without the
emotional feelings to go with it. Both go hand in hand and
one without the other, just doesn't cut it in my book.
Matt
(Male, 27 and single)
|
515.77 | | SHAPES::SMITHS1 | | Fri Oct 12 1990 08:17 | 5 |
|
NO! (I know a few people who would though!)
Female/22/married
|
515.79 | | CSS::KEITH | Real men double clutch | Fri Oct 12 1990 17:50 | 10 |
| No not with all the stuff (STD's) goin' round. I agree it is a nice
fantasy. As a matter of fact, that sorta happened to me last summer in
France. When a good looking female in my group laid a lip lock on me in
a crowded French bar, I just stood there, emotionless. Getting no
response from me she went over and sat upon someone elses lap and
kissed them. A friend of mine not in the group, remarked at how
emotionless I was. Look up slut in the dictionary...her picture
42, male, married
|
515.81 | times, they are changin' | HOCUS::CULLEN | | Tue Oct 16 1990 12:45 | 8 |
| This makes for great reading...
Have in the past, would not today, fantasize about it in the future
Tom
30/male/married
|
515.82 | yes | BHUNA::CPATRICK | HEART OF MIDLOTHIAN F.C. | Fri Oct 19 1990 10:41 | 9 |
| YES...DEFINATELLY...YES
Colin..
27/male/married
a standing d**k has no worries
|
515.83 | What has a duck got to do with anything... :^) | DEC25::BERRY | The SIMPSONS are back! | Mon Oct 22 1990 06:15 | 1 |
|
|
515.84 | | WR2FOR::MANN_JA | | Thu Oct 25 1990 03:31 | 9 |
| Male, 33 married.
No !!
Maybe ! If it was 10 years ago when all this type of stuff
was not going on (I mean STD) I am scared and I believe in safe
sex now.
JM
|
515.86 | | QUIVER::STEFANI | Wiggle it - just a little bit | Thu Oct 25 1990 12:31 | 9 |
| Just an observation:
Isn't it interesting how society finally allows advertising of
contraceptive devices on radio and television, yet as a whole,
this nation is still ignorant of what sexually transmitted
diseases are, how they are contracted, and how they are NOT
contracted.
- Larry
|
515.87 | To know is all | SFCPMO::GUNDERSON | | Tue Oct 30 1990 17:06 | 8 |
| I know I would at least have to know the person for a "no-strings"
attached encounter, and protect myself........I'd hate to catch my
death.
28 - separated - female.
-Lynn
|
515.88 | Yes but with a full metal jacket | KIRKTN::GMITCHELL | lovely and warm,very controllable | Wed Oct 31 1990 22:37 | 4 |
| I would definitely podger her. No questions asked.
Graeme, 21.
|
515.89 | "all's fair in love & war" | FILTON::CASSIDY_S | | Thu Nov 01 1990 10:38 | 16 |
|
Yes. male.32yrs young![Having first put the safe sex provision in
place]
|
515.90 | love is the law, love under will. Who's Will? | MILKWY::JLUDGATE | purple horseshoes | Fri Nov 02 1990 15:07 | 4 |
| yes/male/single/young enough
with safe sex, of course.
|
515.91 | OOPS | MAMTS5::MWANNEMACHER | let us pray to Him | Fri Nov 02 1990 15:49 | 8 |
| RE: Safe sex: Back when I was putting notches on my belt, I had more
than one condom break on me. This is one reason I don't really think
that safe sex has much to do with it. Fortunately these incidents only
caused me some worry, and nothing further.
Peace,
Mike
|
515.92 | Condoms are much less risky when applied properly | WORDY::GFISHER | Work that dream and love your life | Sun Nov 04 1990 17:04 | 30 |
|
In my opinion, the larger risk isn't in using condoms. The larger
risk is in using them improperly. If you leave a bubble in one,
chances of breaking are high. If you don't use lots of water-based
lubrication (do not use petrolium-based lubrications, like Vaseline or
Vaseline-Intensive-Care Lotion), then chances of breaking increase.
I have used condoms many dozens of times in the past 6 years. Several
have broken (4?). None have broken when put on properly and when proper
lubrication was applied. None have broken on me in the past two
years, which would include dozens of uses. And I really do mean 0.
Also, at a safe-sex seminar, one counselor said that some people are
using two condoms ("If you've ever had one break, you would understand
the desire to wear two.")
...or, you could forgo all risk by not having intercourse.
...or, you can forgo intercourse until you find someone with whom you
want to be monogamous with (but then how do you know that both of your
are HIV negative?).
...or, when you do couple (monogamy), you can use safer-sex techniques
only.
...or, ....
There are lots of choices to be made.
--Gerry
|
515.93 | Another yes | SFCPMO::TEGLOVIC | Pools of sorrow, waves of joy | Sun Nov 04 1990 18:24 | 4 |
| 31, married, male
In a second. I could be dead tomorrow. So could I be if my wife
read this too...
|
515.94 | | FORTY2::BOYES | Nineteen tequilas later we struck a deal... | Mon Nov 05 1990 04:20 | 11 |
| Hasn't anyone considered:
1) The partner might be drunk or stoned and might really regret it in the
morning.
2) The partner might be trying to use you against someone else.
3) The partner might be trying to get into your house to nick your stuff.
4) Fatal Attraction.
|
515.95 | life's lessons... | FRAMBO::LIESENBERG | It's supposed to be fun! | Mon Nov 05 1990 07:46 | 12 |
| re .94
"Regret" is the point. In the heat of the night, one tends to think
nothing could be as desirable as ending up in bed together. But it's
amazing how the world has changed the nest morning. Unfortunately, I
had my share of one-night affairs, and it still makes me feel uneasy
when I recall how sick I felt the next morning, and how some good
friendships broke appart...
Doesn't this happen to anyone else, I ask myself? Hasn't anyone
experienced that your animal instinct causes you to rush things and
regret it most bitterly afterwards?
...Paul
|
515.96 | Well, fancy that.... | YUPPY::DAVIESA | She is the Alpha... | Mon Nov 05 1990 07:56 | 9 |
|
Re .89
You don't say, Sean......
;-)
Good to see you in here....
'gail
|
515.97 | | MILKWY::JLUDGATE | purple horseshoes | Mon Nov 05 1990 09:13 | 24 |
| re 515.94
1) The partner might be drunk or stoned and might really regret it in the
morning.
If the other person is somewhat drunk or whatever, I try to be
polite and protective, and don't take advantage of the situation.
The person usually respects me more in the morning for it. And
I respect myself more for it also. Once the person is sober.....
2) The partner might be trying to use you against someone else.
If it is a no-strings attached deal (for me), then I don't really care.
That is the partner's problem.
3) The partner might be trying to get into your house to nick your stuff.
Fortunately, I have nothing of value to nick. Unless the partner
happens to like comic books.
4) Fatal Attraction.
Never saw the movie. My loss (one less thing to be paranoid about.)
|
515.99 | | GRANMA::MWANNEMACHER | let us pray to Him | Mon Nov 05 1990 10:56 | 8 |
| RE; 2 condoms-Mike, alls you have to do is wear 3 all the time, then
when you are going to have sex take one off, hence you feel like a
wildman. :')
Peace,
Mike
|
515.100 | And that guy was HUUUUUUUUUUUUGE ! :^) | BTOVT::BAGDY_M | I'm the Lord of the Wastelands | Wed Nov 07 1990 08:10 | 20 |
| RE: .95
| Doesn't this happen to anyone else, I ask myself? Hasn't anyone
| experienced that your animal instinct causes you to rush things and
| regret it most bitterly afterwards?
Yes it does happen. I lost my best `female' friend back in
1983 from it. We had both been drinking and as things went,
we ended up in bed. Two days later, she started to avoid me.
Just a little more than a month after that, she moved to San
Diego. (Which was completely unplanned as far as I knew.)
Haven't heard from her since, and let me tell you, I still
miss her very much.
What seems right at one moment, may be totally wrong the
next. It's really hard to tell exactly what the situation is
sometimes. I've also been in the situation of being asked to
dance by a woman just so she could make her husband a little
jealous. Yeah, an innocent dance almost lost me my face !
Matt
|
515.101 | | WORDY::GFISHER | Work that dream and love your life | Wed Nov 07 1990 13:50 | 8 |
|
> RE; 2 condoms-Mike, alls you have to do is wear 3 all the time, then
> when you are going to have sex take one off, hence you feel like a
> wildman. :')
Ha! Very good. Nineties version of "Walk on the Wild Side," eh?
--Ger
|
515.102 | Being more truthful abut one-night stands | WORDY::GFISHER | Work that dream and love your life | Wed Nov 07 1990 14:11 | 77 |
|
> But it's
> amazing how the world has changed the nest morning. Unfortunately, I
> had my share of one-night affairs, and it still makes me feel uneasy
> when I recall how sick I felt the next morning, and how some good
> friendships broke appart...
I'm a bit startled at how much I can't relate to this line of
thinking, and I'm wondering why. I have had a substantial number of
"one-night stands," and, although there are no "warm fuzzies" that you
get after sex with someone you care about, I have almost never felt
"sick" the next morning. In fact, I can remember more than a few
times feeling really good about myself and the world. And I've made a
few very close friends because of a one night stand or mini-affair or
pick-up in a bar.
Please note that I'm not denying that there is an element of unsafety
or that there is a chance that you are going to feel like "Oy! Why
did I _do_ that?" All I'm trying to point out is that there are a
gammut of feelings and reactions and fall-out situations that come
from instant pick-ups and one-night stands. I think that it is
unrealistic to paint it as an activity that always makes one feel sick
the next morning and always breaks up good friendships. (I've had
instances in which I've slept with friends and grown closer, I've had
instances in which it didn't really make a dent in the relationship,
and I've had instances in which it has put a damper on the
friendship.)
As someone who is watching my 20's come to a close this year, and as
someone who has spent an incredible amount of time examining my
sex/love life, I think that there is a warning that we could be giving
to young people about sex that we aren't doing. There is a trap that
I fell into, and it was very hard to find ones way out of it. Here's
the trap: I felt driven to be closer to people, the sex felt good,
precautions can protect me from disease, and I don't feel "sick" about
it the next morning, so why shouldn't I keep doing it?
Well, the under-publicized fact (and there are probably more) is that
there is what I would call a "cumulative effect" of limiting ones sex
life to one-night stands. In the beginning, it was fun and
adventurous. In the past few years, despite momentary good feelings,
it has felt desperate and driven. I think that I made a switch from
"trying" one-night stands to "living" on them. And that's like trying
to live on an emotional diet exclusively comprised of potato chips.
I think there is a danger of moralizing and over-generalizing in this
area (as we do in the topic of "drugs" as well). The danger is that
smart-yet-inexperienced kids like me will find out that you are lying
when you say, "One night stands are icky and bad; they will ruin
friendships and make you feel sick the next morning." After a few of
them, I noticed that the lines my parents fed me were bull, so I
mistakenly flip-flopped toward a "It's completely okay" position.
I think the harder job of parents (and all of us in society) is to be
more honest about the gammut of things that can come out of one-night
stands. That way, kids can make well-informed decisions. They won't
be confused when they make a friend from a one-night stand, or when a
one-night stand feels good. It is important to try to get across the
bigger picture, the long-term scenario. I'm not saying ignore the
short-term problems of danger, pregnancy, and disease; I'm just saying
tell the truth about the pleasure involved, too.
There is a movie out called "Goodfellas." I think that it is getting
good reviews for a lot of reasons. However, one remarkable thing
about the film is that it manages to be an anti-mob movie that
honestly portrays the fun of killing and lawlessness. That's what
makes it more bone-chilling than many mob movies. It isn't
simplistic moralizing; it's closer to raw truth.
I think that for our sake and for our kid's sake, we need to get
closer to the raw truth when it comes to sex and one-night stands.
If you try to lie about it by omitting the pleasure and excitement and
the possibility of making friends, they'll smell that lie like a fart
in a car. And they might hurt themselves when they rebell against the
lie. That's what I think happened to me.
--Gerry
|
515.103 | | SMURF::PARADIS | Worshipper of Bacchus | Wed Nov 07 1990 14:57 | 61 |
| [the lurker pokes his head out for a sec...]
Re: .-1
Extremely well put, Gerry! I agree 100% that when we discuss the
merits/risks of one night stands we need to take into account the
big picture. Unfortunately, doing so requires a fair amount of
discussion to cover all the bases and get all the nuances across.
When the subject is sex, though, people in general have a hard time
just bringing themselves to talk about it; hence, they generally
just tumble the words "It's bad for you; don't do it" out of their
mouths and leave it at that.
Re: a couple back:
I've had my "spontaneous" moments in life too, and I can only
recall two occasions when I felt Really Sh*tty the next morning.
The first one was when I had a date with a woman I'd met via
e-mail. When we met, I found her quite pleasant to be with, but
I also found her physically unattractive. Nevertheless, as the
evening progressed and one thing led to another, I decided not to
back out because I hadn't had any sex for a year and was looking
forward to some dry times as well. Felt REALLY bad the next
morning. Total brain-lock. Learned my lesson, though: Don't
take it if you don't want it just because it's offered to you!
[more on this in a moment]
The second time I felt kinda bad in the morning was an occasion
with a good friend of mine where, again, one thing led to
another. In this case, I felt bad the next morning because I
wasn't sure she had really wanted to do it (long story). Well,
she didn't avoid me (like what happened to a previous noter), and
we're still great friends today.
Re: a couple more back....
I've actually heard that using two condoms is less safe than
using one... when two layers of latex rub up against each other
like that they can weaken each other, and blammo! Personally,
I've used condoms ever since I've been sexually active, and
I've had a 100% success rate... and I think that's because I've
read the documentation beforehand (e.g. "Our Bodies, Ourselves".
Yeah, it's a woman's book, but I think men need to read it too!
Its discussion of condoms was quite complete).
Re: .0
Didn't think I'd get to it, did you? Well, my answer would be
"it depends". Basically, I'd size up the situation; does she
seem real, or is she just playing head-games? Am I attracted
to her? Do I really want it now? After the experience I
described above, I tend to be quite careful about confirming
to myself that I really DO want a particular encounter before
I plunge ahead. But if all indicators are go, then I probably
would go for it (making a stop at the drugstore on the way,
natch!).
Vital stats: male/28/married(but not dead...)
--jim
|
515.104 | | YUPPY::DAVIESA | She is the Alpha... | Thu Nov 08 1990 07:39 | 13 |
|
Re .95
Yes, though only once really - but also....
I remember with great affection the times that a good friend and I
have been in one of those situations where we could have got
into bed - and chose not to.
At the time it can cause a little strain, but the next day we've
both *invariably* been happy with the choice we made.
It can be a truly loving choice....
'gail
|
515.105 | Hey, I was NOT moralizing! | FRAMBO::LIESENBERG | It's supposed to be fun! | Thu Nov 08 1990 09:00 | 66 |
| re. 102
Gerry,
I perfectly accept that different people have different approaches for
a fulfilled sexual life, I am not aware of having started a "ban one
night stands" campaign. I know that many people enjoy them, but I
happen to have made different experiences. And I don't like my
experiences being labelled as "lies".
My key to fulfillment is different then yours, and I'm not trying to
tell anybody that my approach is THE correct one. I just raised the
question if someone had made similar experiences to mine. I was not
valuing whether this is "correct" and that is "wrong", those have never
been the categories I think in.
In fact, I wouldn't want to miss any of my exeriences, for they have
made me what I am, and have helped me in finding what works for me,
what type of relationship I feel real and fulfilled in. Besides, I bet
if I hadn't made them I'd have the feeling I was missing something, as
happens to quite some guy I know.
During my wilder days, I just went on sampling out of anatomical
interests, detestable as it is, and sometimes I enjoyed it, more often
than not I didn't. Normally, I felt bad because I hurt a girl that
thought it would be the start of a significant relationship.
Interestingly, if she happened to show my own attitude and told me
"hey, it's summertime, you're nice, and thankee for the memory", my
pride was hurt and I felt even worse, somehow feeling used and my ego
being cracked by the fact that, even though the girl witnessed a
memorable performance, she could endure to go on living without me...
Time moved on, and then I just slithered into one or the other affair
in the heat of the night. Sometimes with a stranger, sometimes with a
woman I was a good friend with. Sometimes it was the wine and the
atmosphere, sometimes it was mistaking the intimacy of friendship and
momentary attraction for love, and the prospect of avoiding a lonely
night, that lead to the bedroom.
I had changed, and this wasn't what I wanted or needed. It just made me
feel sick to know that I had shared my intimacy with someone who was
not close to me, or didn't want to be close to me the next day. I swear
I became physically sick at time, sort of a "one night
stand-hangover"...
I lost friends, I spent mornings with persons that were either looking
at the floor or reproachfully at me, trying to talk but knowing that
words were wasted, and figuring out how I could weasel my way out of
the situation.
Now I know I want to FEEL something for the other person, I want to
feel close, I want to be fighting, being nice, witty and gentlemany for
more than one evening. I want to root for that night and be in a
desperate sweat before I get my way. I need a tender and caring
atmosphere. It must not be the love of my life, mind you, but we must
share more than the urge to avoid a lonesome night. There have been
situations where I nearly fell into it again lately, and the next
morning I (and the particular person) only could say "phheeeew, that
was a close call!".
That's what works for ME.
But it don't need to be good for someone else. I would never play
preacher and tell people what's right and what's wrong. I'd just tell
them to try and find out. And I wouldn't accuse somebody of spreading
lies when he shares his personal experiences with me. I'd say "oh,
that's interesting and different to what I feel", but not "hey, quit
lying, I know better!". I can't fathom what I'd win with lying here...
it's my approach, and it's just as valid as yours.
Again, I wasn't moralizing (I've never done), just saying what I have
experienced. The day I have kids, I'll bloody well tell them to find
out what works out for themselves, by trying out. And I'll let my
kids use my waterbed, too, if there's some demand, unlike my father,
who was an egoist in that respect!
...Paul
|
515.106 | | WORDY::GFISHER | Work that dream and love your life | Fri Nov 09 1990 11:55 | 16 |
|
> Yes, though only once really - but also....
> I remember with great affection the times that a good friend and I
> have been in one of those situations where we could have got
> into bed - and chose not to.
Don't you kinda know at the moment? The times that I've damaged
friendships with sex have happened when I ignored the little voice
inside of me, "This isn't a good i-DE-aaaa!" It usually doesn't feel
right going into it. And then I can make the choice not to go ahead
with it.
At least, that has been my experience.
--Ger
|
515.107 | | WORDY::GFISHER | Work that dream and love your life | Fri Nov 09 1990 12:00 | 22 |
|
RE .104
Thanks for that entry, Paul. I learned a lot, and related to a lot of
what you said.
I apologize if I implied that I thought you were moralizing. It was
much clearer what you were talking about in .104, and I really
appreciate you entering it.
I guess it always comes back to "Know Thyself." I think that you and
I both came around to, "Well, I know what I've been told, and I know
what I've been trying to do, but what really feels right to me."
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounds like we both came around (came
"back"?) to what we needed according to who we are. It was a long
journey for me, and it sounds like it took a while for you, too.
Welcome home.
--Ger
|
515.108 | Wicked Willie strikes again!! | PAKORA::IJOHNSTON | | Tue Nov 13 1990 17:49 | 3 |
| Male/Straight/Definatly with a condom!
Ian.
|
515.109 | Put a jiffy on your squiffy | MASALA::SWRIGHT | Chi Mi,n Tir | Tue Nov 13 1990 17:54 | 6 |
| Male/Single/ 24.......yes but not without a jiffy
Stav.
|
515.110 | Of course, that makes me dateless. | ESIS::GALLUP | Cherish the certainty of now | Tue Nov 13 1990 19:28 | 16 |
|
Female, Single, 25
Most likely not. I've found in my sordid little life that the people
I've been propositioned by were more interested in pleasing themselves
instead of the me. I feel sex is about sharing and giving, not taking
and getting.
If all they want is self-gratification, they can do that themselves...
After all, what fun is sex is you're not giving all you have to the
other person?
kath
|
515.111 | are you lonely tonite | BHUNA::CPATRICK | HEART OF MIDLOTHIAN F.C. | Tue Nov 13 1990 20:52 | 7 |
| yes i totally agree with you kath...
when will we meet.. ;-) hehehe
Colin...
|
515.112 | | PAKORA::IJOHNSTON | | Tue Nov 13 1990 20:53 | 3 |
| Who says I was just interested in self gratification?
Ian.
|
515.113 | i'm only asking | BHUNA::CPATRICK | HEART OF MIDLOTHIAN F.C. | Tue Nov 13 1990 20:54 | 5 |
| who says you where even interested Ian....
Colin..
|
515.114 | | ESIS::GALLUP | Cherish the certainty of now | Wed Nov 14 1990 09:52 | 10 |
|
Gosh, how come I never get this kind of attention all the time?????
I could live with it!
8-)
kath
|
515.115 | No | NOVA::FISHER | Rdb/VMS Dinosaur | Thu Nov 15 1990 07:35 | 9 |
| Male/straight/44. Not anymore.
Giving, caring, sharing are alright, in fact, great, but sooner or
later you have to get out of the sack. Many of the women I've met
seemed to think that "the event" was enough to cause me to change
my existence evermore. It ain't worth it.
ed
|
515.116 | | PELKEY::PELKEY | Life, a state of cluster transition | Fri Nov 16 1990 13:14 | 3 |
| Male/age:33/Married (13 years)
Answer: "No thanks, I'm trying to cut down"
|
515.117 | | PEKING::BAKERT | Too HOT to handle, too cool to be blue! | Wed Nov 21 1990 10:34 | 8 |
| Female/23/single not at the moment....
But then again I believe in making love (and feel the same things as
cath expressed)....not SEX....for me ....it's ok for those who wish to!
Tracie.
|
515.118 | | SUBURB::COOKS | | Wed Nov 28 1990 08:35 | 5 |
| I had more women in the sack than i`ve smoked fags.(And i smoke 60 fags
a day).
Captain Headcase
|
515.119 | SLEEP IN YOUR OWN BED | SUBURB::BROWNA | | Wed Nov 28 1990 08:35 | 8 |
| Female/20/single if you want me to be
I dont beleive in people sleeping around because sex is supposed to
be for two people who love each other and want to express their
feelings.
lucky
|
515.120 | | SUBURB::MURPHYK | This is Radio Clash | Wed Nov 28 1990 08:44 | 3 |
| Male/23/Single
That's not what you told me the other night, Mrs. Headcase.
|
515.121 | THE OTHER NIGHT | SUBURB::BROWNA | | Wed Nov 28 1990 09:48 | 5 |
| RE: 120
What did i tell you the other night !!!!
Ex-Captain Headcase's Wife
|
515.122 | | SUBURB::MURPHYK | This is Radio Clash | Wed Nov 28 1990 10:08 | 4 |
| You said if someone invited you back for coffee you'd say no, but if
they said "will you have sex with me" you'd say yes.
|
515.123 | THE MAN FROM DELMONTE SAY YES | SUBURB::BROWNA | | Thu Nov 29 1990 08:11 | 8 |
| RE:122
I think that Murphy has got a bit confused it should of said,( coming
from the lion's mouth). If someone invited murphy back for a coffee
he would say no, but if the asked him to have sex with them he would of
said yes, i close my case.
lucky
|