T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
451.1 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu May 03 1990 11:08 | 16 |
| I don't think this is anything new - it's only that it's become
"okay" for women to admit it now. In the past, we've wanted to
believe that women wouldn't "cheat", and looked the other way when
men did it. I think that the actual frequency has been a lot closer
between the sexes than we've been willing to admit.
As for how it feels? Betrayal of trust is no piece of cake - for
men or women. I don't think that a man would feel any differently
about it than a woman would.
I will note, having participated in a discussion of this topic
in HUMAN_RELATIONS, that whether a certain activity is "cheating"
depends on the expectations of the people involved. If you put
it in terms of trust betrayed, the issues are clearer.
Steve
|
451.2 | | HLFS00::RHM_MALLO | dancing the night away | Thu May 03 1990 11:21 | 5 |
| I.M.H.O, "having one on the side" whether you're married or not
is cheating (in a big way), and if I found out my SO *was* cheating,
all further communication would go via solicitors!
Charles
|
451.3 | | HANNAH::MODICA | | Thu May 03 1990 12:06 | 6 |
|
I can forgive a lot of things but I don't think I could
ever forgive betrayal, whether it is by my wife, friends,
whoever.
Hank
|
451.4 | | SUPER::DENISE | little lizard whipper | Thu May 03 1990 12:12 | 20 |
|
i cheated once on my IO, after years of hearing how unattractive,
stupid and lucky that he married me, i rebelled.
it made me look at things differently and select a choice that i
thought was too hard to make. i told him it was over and i was
leaving, packed up the kids & myself with half the furniture
and moved into an apartment....18 months into divorce proceedings
i'm confident i did the right thing. i've got a healthier attitude
without him around....
in summary, i don't condone affairs, i don't condone mine, either.
but not because it might have hurt the IO but it did result in
some false expectations from the adulterers. i guess what you can
take heart in is that a valuable lesson can be learnt from it.
as to those who are habitual cheaters, they are either blind to the
obvious or setting out to destroy their partners. like in anything
that is wrongfully habitual someone always comes out hurt in one
shape or form.
|
451.6 | | CSG002::MEDEIROS | Value MY Difference | Thu May 03 1990 13:53 | 30 |
|
I'm not certain that my (ex-)wife was cheating before she left,
(I never confronted her with what I suspected) but I believe that
she was. All the evidence was there - a decline in the quality
of our marriage, a dramatic increase in the number of nights that
she had to work late "because things here in the office are just
so busy," a sudden increase in the amount of attention paid to
personal grooming (hair, clothes, make-up, jewelry, perfume) and
obviously none of it for my benefit, mysteriously appearing items
in her wardrobe that were clearly not affordable according to our
household budget (jewelry, clothes, etc.) that would have been my
choices as gifts were I to have had an affair on the side, a sudden
need for nights out "with a few of my friends from work" where time
of return home was generally around 3:00 A.M., a complete refusal
on her part to talk about anything concerning the two of us except
the day-to-day details of maintaining the household.
Getting to .0: How does it feel? You go through the same grieving
process that happens when someone close to you dies. First, there's
disbelief and denial, then sadness, hurt, and disappointment, then
anger, and finally acceptance. (In a way, the end of the trust
between two people who have pledged to be faithful to each other
is a kind of death, I suppose). The final emotion you're left
with is insult and resentment; you feel cheated, used, disrespected,
betrayed, and very, very insulted (or at least I did). I can't
understand how anyone with any self-respect at all can stay with
someone who has been unfaithful; at the very least, with all the
incurable diseases out there now, some of them merely unpleasant
and some fatal, your physical health is at serious risk, not to
even mention your mental and emotional health.
|
451.7 | ? | CSG002::MEDEIROS | Value MY Difference | Thu May 03 1990 13:57 | 10 |
|
Re .5:
Why does Digital policy prevent you from answering
the question in .0 honestly?
Sincerely curious -
|
451.8 | I'm Dealing with this situation now ... | GRANPA::TTAYLOR | I do not want what I don't have | Thu May 03 1990 15:37 | 43 |
| I'm not married so this might not apply, but technically the feelings
I'm feeling now are the same as my *un*happily married sister, so here
goes:
There comes a point in a relationship when you feel almost *used*.
When your SO or husband takes you for granted, all the "little things"
you've ever done for them. All the romance is gone. Sex? Your lives
as so busy, he doesn't have *time* for sex. And when it happens it's
one of the "wham-bam" things that leave you wanting to cry after he
rolls over and snores away the second he's finished. When he no longer
cares about *your* pleasure, just wants to "get it over with" for his
*own* sake.
Whatever happened to kisses and hugs, holding hands. Now you're just
a piece of the furniture. If that. And his friends and immediate
family, *his* needs, are much more important than any of your needs or
wants or hopes and dreams.
Communication? There is none. You want to find out why there is a
"wall" being built between the two of you. You know it's not another
woman, so what is it? Your attempt to make things better and
communicate is met with silence. So you turn, in your pain, to another
man. Not in the physical sense. For the romance and the sweet joy
that was lost between the one you love and yourself. That is what I'm
having to deal with now. I've been with Sean for a year and he's too
busy for me. Life is painful for me now. I've learned not to "put all
my eggs in one basket". So instead of working things out verbally, I'm
dating a couple of men from school to ease the pain I'm feeling over
being neglected. I've never done that before. When he decides to
commit himself to this relationship and try and meet me half-way,
that's when I'll stop dating.
My heart still belongs to Sean. But I'm not going to be left high &
dry and feel so much pain. So I really can relate to women who cheat
on their husbands. Sean may not be my husband, and I may not be
cheating on him in the *biblical* sense, but I'm "dating" to ease the
pain. And if I should find someone who can keep my interest, maybe,
just maybe, I'll say goodbye. Who can say? Life is *strange*! You
work so hard for something good, and when it doesn't come to fruition,
you deserve to seek elsewhere for happiness.
Tammi
|
451.9 | | CSG002::MEDEIROS | Value MY Difference | Thu May 03 1990 16:16 | 24 |
|
Re .8:
Tammi -
I'm sorry to hear that things aren't good between you
and Sean. It sounds like you're really unhappy with the way things
are, and that you've really tried to tell him how you feel, and
what you need.
On the other hand, I don't condone what you're doing.
It sounds to me like you've given up and decided that he's not the
right man for you - and if that's the case, you owe it to him, if
you care about him at all, to let him know NOW. Say goodbye now,
and don't wait until you find someone else who can "keep your
interest." Let him know that you feel used, neglected, and ignored,
and you won't put up with it. If you have any respect for him and
for yourself, you'll set things straight in this relationship before
you seek another.
(This is just my own personal advice, for what it's worth).
P.S. Your personal name doesn't match what you say in .8
|
451.11 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu May 03 1990 23:01 | 3 |
| I'd say .6 pretty well sums it up.
Steve
|
451.12 | Dazed and confused | GRANPA::TTAYLOR | I do not want what I haven't got | Fri May 04 1990 10:22 | 56 |
| RE:9
On the contrary, I HAVEN'T given up on him. That's why I'm dating
other people. to give both of us some breathing room. The more dates I go
on, the more I see the value of what *he* brings to me as compared to
others. But he is in a self-centered, selfish stage of his life right
now. I can't compete with that, no way. Therefore, I'm not going to
stay by his side and be complacent. I've tried everything possible to
make things work for us. You are right, I'm unhappy, not really with
him as a person, but with the situation *he* has allowed us to be in at
this point.
You are right, my PN doesn't match what I'm feeling right now, but you
must understand that the only thing I want out of life (besides being
successful at work and home) is his love, support and respect. I'm not
like these typical "washingtonian" women who care about the bank
account, the kind of car someone drives and the material things he can
bring. I wish to be part of a team, two people working together
towards common goals and ideas. That's about all I ask for. So it
isn't too much, and it's something I've *always* had in my
relationships. Until now.
Sean is well aware of the fact that men are interested in me, I'm not
hiding anything from him. If he told me to stop and he wanted to work
things out, I'd do it in a heartbeat. But he doesn't, so I'll do it
until he realizes that 1) he can live without me or 2) he will meet
me 1/2 way.
As for the men I'm dating, they are aware that at this stage of the
game, I'm wanting friendship and companionship, nothing more. I do
nothing wrong on dates and send them no mixed messages as to what I
want. So the only person I'm hurting is myself. Why myself? Because
I very much want to be with Sean. But in order to give him space, I
pull away from him. It's the way *he* wants it, not me.
Back in my mother's time, men actually "competed" to get the "woman of
their dreams". There was nothing wrong with a woman casual dating a few
men at a time. Some women were real "heart breakers", getting "pinned"
to lots of guys at the same time. This was considered to be acceptable
behavior. At least I'm being *honest* and upfront, and no one's
getting hurt, because I'm a very honest person. I've never done this
before, and I actually asked mom and Sean's mom if I was doing the
right thing in the situation I'm in and both agreed that this is the
right thing to do. So I feel somewhat comfortable that I'm not "using"
anyone ...
But I'm digressing from the original topic, aren't I? Sorry! You can
aplly this scenario to married life, I'm sure, if you really think
about it, guys. Women want the emotional aspect of love, while men
want the physical aspect. You have to balance both to maintain
happiness. What I've written about is typical of many marriages that
have turned sour. I hear many stories of women I work with having
affairs, and the beginning of them started due to feelings such as what
I've put down.
Tammi (who's hoping and praying that things will be ok)
|
451.13 | Some observations... | TLE::FISHER | Work that dream and love your life | Fri May 04 1990 10:42 | 20 |
|
If two people are not in an explicitly stated, committed monogamous
relationship, then dating other people is not cheating. If two
unmarried people run into trouble in a committed realtionship and if
one of them says "I need to see other people," I don't consider that
to be cheating. If it's one thing that I can't stand, it's being held
to some unspoken agreement that I didn't know about; the commitment
and terms must be explicitly agreed upon.
"Condoning" is an interesting word. It assumes an awful lot of power
in what I consider to be someone else's private life.
"I do not want what I haven't got" is an ideal. I don't think that it
is wise to berate onself for not embodying an ideal.
--Gerry
PS As usual, this is all my opinion, not the truth with a capital
"T."
|
451.14 | If you want to run - state your intentions up front! | MILKWY::BUSHEE | From the depths of shattered dreams! | Fri May 04 1990 11:34 | 19 |
| RE: Tammi and Gerry
Maybe the two of you feel it's okay to date others because
they aren't married, but still turn the tables and ask yourself
how you'd feel if the person you thought was your partner was
dating others without your knowledge. Not too well I'd expect!!
I can't see why anyone would do this to another person, if you
want to date others (if your married or not), why not end the
first relationship rather than run shod over someone's feelings?
I know how it feels to think the one you love is true to you only
to find out later you were one of many!! In my opinion, having that
person do something to hurt me physically would hurt alot less than
the hurt you feel after you discover your loved one was cheating.
I'm not saying you have to stop seeing them, just you owe it to
them to be up front about your actions. Anything less is the same
as lying, you are living a lie, your SO thinks you are true when
in fact you aren't.
G_B
|
451.15 | Oops, I'm getting defensive | GRANPA::TTAYLOR | I do not want what I haven't got | Fri May 04 1990 12:37 | 18 |
| RE:.14
Not to get on the defense, but if you re-read my past notes, you'll see
that I stated I have been up-front and honest with all concerned about
what I'm doing. Not only that, but we had a stated commitment back in
September, neither of us wanted to date others. But I found that the
more I "assumed" with this new-found commitment, the more he
"backed-off" and the worse he treated me. And the worse I felt about
myself. Now that he's got *lots* of competition, he's playing the old
"cat and mouse" game. And he loves it. Let me state for the record
that I actually *hate* playing games. But I love this man and feel a
strong commitment. When he decides to "grow up" and make a "true"
commitment of the heart, instead of playing headgames, then I'll go
back to being the steady, sweet, dependable, committed and loving woman
that I am.
Tammi
|
451.16 | Just what my opinion | ROLL::DANG | | Fri May 04 1990 13:36 | 16 |
| This is to reply .8
I am not married also; so I don't know how it exactly feels like. For
the sake of discussion, I would want my wife to talk this out with me rather
than approaching the solution from a third person. The wife has the responsi-
bility to find out why her husband is acting like that; who knows, may be there
are reasons for it. If the both of them can't talk it out or can't melt the
ice between, then the best solution is to separate and move on with each other's
life. What I am saying is, I strongly disagree that the wife sees a problem that
she is bothered so much by it while the husband doesn't know about it (many men
have the tendency to neglect little things); and then she searchs for someone
else to replace him in the future. Meanwhile, she'll just stick with her
present marriage until the time to "surprise" him. If you are no longer care
about your partner, say goodbye to him or her; then you'll still can be friends
and greet each other in the future when the two of you meet. However, if one
cheated on the other, a hatred is created, and why would any one want it?
|
451.17 | worth a second thought | FSTTOO::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Fri May 04 1990 14:06 | 26 |
| I have been married for less than one year (my age is nearly 50 and
this is my second marriage...the first one from 1963 'till 1988), so,
since I am still "sort of" on my honeymoon, perhaps I am a bit
idealistic about this topic.
The relationship my wife and I have is so very special to me and utterly
different from my previous marriage. I think, that should my wife have
a "fling" now, it would be totally out of her character, and probably
would have tons of surrounding circumstances. I value our relationship
so much, that I think I would let it pass, and try to keep the
relationship intact. Yeah, I'd be hurt, and a lot of trust would
require patching up, but, what we have is worth that effort. I am NOT
saying it wouldn't hurt as much as ever, but... well you know what I
mean.
However, if, for some reason, our relationship begins to fade...then an
infidelity occurs, that sort of points the finger of responsibility
right back at me/us. Why did it fade in the first place...what could
we do to keep that from happening.
In my previous live (last marriage), I'd have probably acted
impulsively and have tossed her out...wound up leaving her anyway (for
different reasons). I'd really have to think about that now, though.
There's just too much at stake now. It's too good to give up on.
tony (who's just thinking out loud)
|
451.18 | | ICESK8::KLEINBERGER | S.N.A.G.-HAG | Fri May 04 1990 14:47 | 20 |
|
.13>If two people are not in an explicitly stated, committed monogamous
.13>relationship, then dating other people is not cheating. If two
I agree with the above, but I got the impression from .0 that this was
in a committed relationship.
I'm not a man, so I can't answer about cheating wives, but I do know
that **if** I am in a committed monogamous relationship, and I find out
he indeed did cheat ( where cheat equals a date that is not just two
friends [one male, one female for a heterosexual relationship] going
out and having a good time, but a possible romantic encounter being
set up)... I would walk... no if, ands, or butts about it...
I've done it once, and I have no qualms about doing it again.. it
if you feel that you need to not be in a committed monogamous
relationship, and you are in one now, then you need to communicate that
to the other person before you play...
just my 4.5 cents worth :-)
|
451.19 | | IAMOK::MITCHELL | It's all in the balancing, my dear | Fri May 04 1990 15:12 | 15 |
|
I've talked with men who have lived with cheating wives
for years. I asked one man how he could stay with a
woman whom he knew was having affairs. At first he
answered that he loved her, and of course for the
childrens sake. Then, he thought for a bit, and told
me that it was somewhat erotic to think about his
wife with another man, and it actually increased his
desire for her.
This is something I can't understand. To think of my
SO with someone else would decrease my desire for him.
kits
|
451.20 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | short term memory loss | Fri May 04 1990 15:19 | 9 |
| >Then, he thought for a bit, and told
> me that it was somewhat erotic to think about his
> wife with another man, and it actually increased his
> desire for her.
Some people are into this; not me. The only desire it would increase is the
desire to terminate.
The Doctah
|
451.21 | in other words, i agree with you, ::LEVESQUE | CDROM::AFONSO | | Fri May 04 1990 15:59 | 5 |
|
that whole idea is repulsive....
imagine having to compete with date #1 r 2 or 3, etc????
no way.
|
451.22 | | DASXPS::HENDERSON | Let the words be yours | Fri May 04 1990 16:38 | 24 |
| I cannot necessarily condone Tammie's actions, however I can see quite
clearly what she is talking about and experiencing. As my marriage was
nearing the breaking point I was in a number of ways, like Sean. I spent
less time with my wife, I became selfish spending more time at my job or
with friends and ignored her pleas and warnings. Rather than go into all
the details here, let me just say that finally I figured out that while I
cared for her, I did not love her anymore..I could not be the person/husband
she wanted me to be. To be that person would not have been me.
Was she cheating on me? I suspected it at one point and confronted her
and she denied it. I believed it then, but looking back now I think she
was seeing someone, and from where I sit today I can't say that I blame
her if she was. She had/has her needs that I could not fulfil. And after
expressing time and again that she wanted *me* not someone else to supply
those needs, and I couldn't/didn't, she needed someone to do so, as does
Tammie. We all do.
Should she tell him? I don't know. But if she has expressed to him, what
she has expressed here and he hasn't responded then its time to really question
his desire to continue the relationship.
Jim
|
451.23 | Thanks for the insight | GRANPA::TTAYLOR | I do not want what I haven't got | Fri May 04 1990 16:46 | 20 |
| re:.22
Jim:
Thanks for the understanding. And you know, your point of view has
made me think about whether he's feeling the same way you felt about
*your* breakup. Maybe he's sick of it all, and is trying to sort of
"drive me" to ending it, rather than he himself ending it?
Luckily, we are *not* married! I don't think he will ever be ready for
a "serious" relationship, to be honest. At least not with me. I get
the impression that he may just want something pretty to hang on his
arm for those occasions that call for a convenient female companion to
show off with. Whatever the reason, I'm more convince that I'm doing
right by not putting all my eggs in one basket. I've given so much to
the relationship that I'm finding myself becoming more and more
resentful as the feelings are not returned (at least to my knowledge
they aren't).
Tammi
|
451.24 | Whatever........... | FDCV01::ROSS | | Fri May 04 1990 17:08 | 10 |
| Some of the replies in this string remind me of a line William
Hurt made in the movie "The Bill Chill":
Rationalizations are more important than sex.
When was the last time you went a day without
a good rationalization?
Alan
|
451.25 | | USIV02::BROWN_RO | almost Cinco de Mayo | Fri May 04 1990 20:20 | 21 |
| Tammi-
>My heart still belongs to Sean.
Why? I don't understand why you are there for him at all, if he is not
there for you at all. In my book, this doesn't sound like a
relationship. By sticking with him, you are preventing yourself from
being with someone who will treat you well, with love, and respect.
>You
>work so hard for something good, and when it doesn't come to fruition,
>you deserve to seek elsewhere for happiness.
I think you should take your own advice on this one.
There are such things as dry wells.
Just my opinion.
-roger
|
451.26 | | PEKING::NASHD | Whatever happened to Capt. Beaky? | Sat May 05 1990 05:51 | 4 |
|
Who are we to criticize or approve Tammi's actions?
|
451.27 | late night thoughts | WMOIS::B_REINKE | sparks fly round your head | Sun May 06 1990 01:28 | 43 |
| Perhaps part of the problem is that in this day and age people
tend to associate having relationships with people or dating
more than one person with having sex with them.
In the past when young women were encouraged to date around it was
assumed that the relatioships would go no further than a chaste kiss
good night.
Even in the cases of the young women who would get 'pinned' to several
young men.
Does anyone even remember anymore when a 'girl' who kissed on a first
date was 'fast'? Now, from what I have been told, by my single friends,
sex on a first date is often a matter of course.
Why must a dating relationship imply monogamy? Assuming it is just
exactly that, a dating relationship without personal intimacy.
Accepting one or more dates with a person does not imply a commitment
to that person.
In a similar vein, married persons can have friends of the opposite
sex, of whom they are fond, without it being a betrayal of their
marriage.
Neither of these points, obviously addresses the base note, that of
women (or men) for that matter, who actively cheat in a sexual sense
on their spouses.
I believe that Steve Lionel is right in that it has simply become more
apparent that some women do what some men have done more publically
for a long time. However, it is possible that the availability of
reliable birth control in the form of the pill increased women's
chosing to emulate the male sexual pattern in recent times.
Quite honestly I think that people's private lives are none of my
business and I chose not to judge people or speculate on their
personal choices.
Tho I would suggest that a common reason that people 'cheat' rather
than leave is simple human insecurity, and fear of being left
alone, rather than some sort of warped lack of personal integrity.
Bonnie
|
451.28 | | CSC32::J_OPPELT | You go first -- after me. | Sun May 06 1990 12:03 | 37 |
| re .25
> >My heart still belongs to Sean.
>
> Why?
This is what unconditional love is all about. This is what makes
a lasting marriage. This is what is often missing in many of the
marriages that break up today. This is what is meant by DECIDING
to love.
I see two kinds of love in relationships. There is the romantic,
infatuated love -- honeymoons, romances, storybook kinds of stuff.
This love is based on feelings, and feelings are fleeting and
change on a daily basis. For many people, when this love ends,
so does the marriage. It is easy to love with this type of love.
(This doesn't only apply to marriages, but to any relationship --
for example, getting a new car.)
There is a second kind of love that is not based on feelings. It
is the love that comes from deciding to love. It is a decision
that chooses to look beyond the faults of both your partner and
yourself. To experience this kind of love you first have to
experience disillusionment in the relationship. If you decide
to give up when you hit disillusionment, you have decided not to
love. But those long-lasting and strong marriages are the ones
in which the decisions to love were made, and the relationship
survived the storm. They come out of it closer and stronger.
I always feel an uplifting in my heart when I see or hear of
someone trying to make a relationship work out in the face of
seemingly unbeatable odds. They may not make it work out in the
end, but if they had chosen to go with the odds and throw in the
towel, they would have guaranteed failure.
Joe Oppelt
|
451.29 | | CSG002::MEDEIROS | Value MY Difference | Mon May 07 1990 10:55 | 23 |
|
Re .28:
Sure, you can "decide" to love someone who doesn't treat
you well, in a relationship where you're not getting what you need,
if you want to do that. You can also "decide" to stay with a
boring, dead-end job that you hate, living on the hope that some
day things will turn around and suddenly the job will become
rewarding and exciting, if you want to do that, too. But I think
in both cases, what keeps someone in the situation is more the
fear of abandoning the current SO or job and having to compete and
face rejection again in the dating or job market than any noble
quest to make the love or job work "in the face of opposing odds."
I think that if person "A" is in a relationship where what they
need and are looking for isn't being provided, and person "B" knows
how person "A" feels and isn't about to change, then person "A"
is being cheated and used by person "B".
Ever heard anyone use the phrase "Why buy the cow when
you're getting the milk for free"? Sounds like Sean's rationalization
to me.
|
451.30 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon May 07 1990 11:02 | 6 |
| Please, folks, lets not put people on trial here. The base topic asked
for contributions on the subject of how men feel about "cheating wives",
though it would seem reasonable to broaden that to a discussion on
betrayal of trust in a relationship.
Steve
|
451.31 | Marriage takes 100% | CSC32::J_OPPELT | You go first -- after me. | Mon May 07 1990 12:54 | 35 |
| re .29
Yes, you are correct. There comes a time when continuing to
make the decision to love becomes a seemingly foolish act.
The point I was trying to make is that the end of romance and
infatuation does not have to be the end of a loving relationship.
People all too quickly write off the relationship when the newness
fades. It is at that point when they can walk, or stick around
and MAKE it work. There are few things as satisfying as a
relationship where the partners have gone beyond the disillusionment
and MADE it work.
But both partners have to be willing to work at the relationship
or it will surely die. Both have to be willing to give 100%.
Marriage is not a 50-50 proposition. It is a 100-100 proposition.
And in light of that and this topic, I'd have to say that while
I would feel hurt, devastated and betrayed, I would not boot out
my wife if I found out she was cheating. We consider our marriage
to be the primary way to fill our needs (such as the need to love and
be loved, self worth, belonging, independence). If my wife has to
look outside of our relationship to fill her needs, I have failed
her. It is also our own personal responsibility to convey to each
other just what needs are not being filled, as well as to listen
to the other when a need is being expressed. If she was unable to
let me know what her needs are, than I may have failed to listen,
or I may have fostered an atmosphere the discouraged her from
trying to communicate.
Sure, I'd be crushed if she cheated. But I would be equally
devastated knowing that I let her down in failing to help her
fill her needs.
Joe Oppelt
|
451.32 | CHEATING IS HEAVY! | POLKST::CLIFFORD_VI | MI ALMA | Mon May 07 1990 19:29 | 16 |
| RE: .22
I am of the same mindframe as .22. I don't know if I worked so
many hours because my marriage was failing or my marriage failed
because I worked so many hours - but I definitely could not be the
husband she wanted and she could not be the wife I wanted. We cared,
but we were no longer in love with each other. I honestly cannot
blame her for going to bed with someone else as we had exhausted
all other alternatives but lacked the resolve to go our separate
ways until the ultimate 'thing' came between us.
Cheating on a spouse is an emotional baggage some people will always
carry - and some can't do that very well, witness my ex. I hope
never to be in the receiving end position again and make sure my
wife I have today is the wife I'll have always, by communicating
and always building on the relationship.
|
451.33 | NOW I UNDERSTAND. | USWRSL::BOUCHER_RO | | Tue May 08 1990 00:54 | 12 |
| IT is a good thing most of you understand,the nature of your opinoins.
I just started wandering through notes,when I came across this subject.
Witch makes my situation,a little more interesting.The little lady
to was suppose to be my wife.Decided the grass might be greenner
on the side.Even though this was a little more than a year ago.
Now that we are legally divorced.Here other little night in shinning
armer,has sent her on her marry little way.Now that she back in
town I am scared to death she will come a calling.To risk the only
sanity I left,would be crazy,to even think about trying this agian,
would be crazy.Thank You all for your insights.Now I think I can
handle this in a more mature and sincable fation.In ording to maintian
my own self respect.THANK YOU.
|
451.34 | SO? | ASHBY::DANG | | Tue May 08 1990 13:30 | 2 |
| I noticed the word "SO" mentioned so often here. Can any one tell me
what exactly it is? I just want to confirm it with what I think it is. Thanks.
|
451.35 | Significant Other | CSG002::MEDEIROS | Value MY Difference | Tue May 08 1990 13:45 | 0 |
451.36 | Commitment is my middle name! ... | GRANPA::TTAYLOR | I do not want what I haven't got | Tue May 08 1990 16:18 | 21 |
| Steve (and everyone):
I want to thank all of you for your input re: my situation. It took a
lot for me to bare my soul over the NOTESwaves, but this situation has
left me feeling terrible.
I value everyone's opinion re: my story and I have learned a lot. Some
of the answers are already buried in my heart, it just took another
person to bring out what I was already feeling, but holding back.
Personally, I have chosen to stick around and hope for the best.
Commitment is one of my big things, and I made a decision long ago to
give it my best shot. I realize he's going through some "growing
pains" and changes of his own. If after a certain amount of time
things haven't evolved into something a bit better for my heart to
take, then I'll take definitive action to end the relationship. I
guess that's what most people would do, anyway.
Thanks for everyone's .02!
Tammi
|
451.37 | | DZIGN::STHILAIRE | do you have a brochure? | Tue May 08 1990 16:55 | 7 |
| Re .33, "the little lady....was suppose to be my wife", huh?
Interesting....
Lorna
|
451.38 | OOPS MY FAULT I'LL EXPLAIN. | USWRSL::BOUCHER_RO | | Wed May 09 1990 00:32 | 8 |
|
Well 37,concernning your opinion and or comment,maybe I
should explain myself.What I ment to say was,or what I was trying
to say concernning the remark.Was this marrige thing,Isn"t it supposed
to be based on love trust and or morals.Well,maybe in this case,
just a little honesty and truth.
|
451.39 | | DZIGN::STHILAIRE | do you have a brochure? | Wed May 09 1990 10:58 | 5 |
| re .38, yes, but I wouldn't respect, love or trust anyone who referred
to me as the "little lady."
Lorna
|
451.40 | | TRNSAM::HOLT | Robert Holt, ISVG West | Wed May 09 1990 13:27 | 4 |
|
-.1
Well, you *are* slight, are you not?
|
451.41 | SORRY | USWRSL::BOUCHER_RO | | Wed May 09 1990 16:07 | 7 |
|
DEAR LORNA:
Well,you got me agian.Maybe I should change my choice
of words a little.If I have,I didn"t mean to affend anybody.If your
refierring to the fact that I called her THE LITTLE LADY,your quit
right.I should have change my choice of words.MY APOLOGIES.
|
451.42 | Not everyone is offended | IAMOK::MITCHELL | It's all in the balancing, my dear | Wed May 09 1990 16:12 | 15 |
| > <<< Note 451.41 by USWRSL::BOUCHER_RO >>>
> refierring to the fact that I called her THE LITTLE LADY,your quit
> right.I should have change my choice of words.MY APOLOGIES.
There are plenty of women who have been called
"The little lady" by their husbands and do not,
have not found it offensive. My Mother being one !!
Probably because she is a lady....and little...and
knows that it's an affectionate phrase.
kits
|
451.43 | I Wasn't Offended and I Don't Even Know Your Wife :-) | FDCV01::ROSS | | Wed May 09 1990 16:55 | 18 |
| Re: .42
Sure, Kits, but you do understand that it's not PC, don't you? :-)
Re: .41 (BOUCHER_RO)
Sorry, don't know your first name. I am curious about something,
though.
If you refer to your wife as "THE LITTLE LADY" in her presence,
and she doesn't mind, why should you not continue to refer to
her as such in this file?
I'm sure you and your wife know what she likes to be called more
than some stranger whose name appears on your screen.
Alan
|
451.44 | ANYWAY | USWRSL::BOUCHER_RO | | Wed May 09 1990 19:13 | 4 |
|
Well,any to get back on track,I just understand,and can
relate to anyelse this might happen to.Sometimes you can work it
out and sometimes,you just have to get on with you life.
|
451.45 | | DZIGN::STHILAIRE | do you have a brochure? | Thu May 10 1990 10:12 | 16 |
| re .41, thank you very much for the apology. :-)
re Bob Holt, yes, I am "slight" in build, and you're not. So what?
:-)
re Alan Ross, I wasn't offended by the term "little lady" because
it is *PI* ..... I have more reasoning capabilities than to just
hop on the liberal PC bandwagon on all issues ..... I was offended
by it because as a 40 yr. old woman who supports herself and isn't
a halfwit, if a man referred to *me* as a "little lady" I would
suspect that he wasn't taking me seriously as an equal human being.
:-) (which I, of course, am)
Lorna
|
451.46 | | DZIGN::STHILAIRE | do you have a brochure? | Thu May 10 1990 10:14 | 6 |
| re .45, in addition, since I am also 5'1" and weigh 97 lbs. I have
heard terms such as this in reference to myself more than some larger
women may have, therefore it may be more of a "hot button" for me.
Lorna
|
451.47 | Littler than you | OTOU01::BUCKLAND | and things were going so well... | Thu May 10 1990 10:19 | 6 |
| Gee Lorna, you're big.
My "little lady" is 4'11" and 93lbs.
Cheers,
Bob
|
451.48 | HOT BUTTON | DNEAST::PLANTE_PAT | Nature Lover - The Great Outdoors | Tue Jul 24 1990 14:48 | 3 |
| Any form of CHEATING, whether your S/O is your wife, husband, girlfriend,
boyfriend in my opinion STINKS!! And LYING falls in the same
category!!
|
451.49 | Communication is KEY! | USCTR2::PNOVITCH | PAM | Wed Jan 16 1991 10:53 | 20 |
|
I think the key word here is COMMUNICATE. If someone is unaware of
your feelings and/or ignoring them, than the worst WILL happen
eventually. Everyone NEEDS to be loved. No human being can live on a
'one way' street forever. They may pretend to be happy, but they're not.
If your needs are not being met, something should be done now. If
your "SO" doesn't see anything wrong (or refuses to see anything wrong,)
there is something seriously wrong with her/him.
Perhaps some counceling can bring it out. Sometimes a third party can
tap into some emotions that a "SO" can't for reasons to many to mention
(i.e. ego, shame, fear of control, etc.)
So talk, laugh, and enjoy!
Pam
|