T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
375.1 | You never get used to the feeling - or lack of it | LESLIE::LESLIE | Andy ��� Leslie | Wed Sep 20 1989 16:25 | 11 |
| The best that I've ever used were Trojan "Naturalamb".
Having said that, condoms are awful. They are really difficult to uise
effectively and frustrating in extremis when you have to cry "Whoa!
Wait! Where did we put 'em?".
Have you considered alternatives? Like the cap?
When you say that you go "out of control", what do you mean?
- ���
|
375.2 | got to use something | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | You've crossed over the river... | Wed Sep 20 1989 16:33 | 10 |
| Andy- I agree. Naturalamb are the best I've tried (but rather expensive!)
almost $2 each
I also don't like wearin' them. It can be SOOOO inconvenient. I have a
delightful 7 month old daughter due in large part for not having one at an
important time. :-)
It's no fun, but I don't want snip snip, so...
The Doctah
|
375.3 | a necessary evil I suppose | HANNAH::MODICA | | Wed Sep 20 1989 17:49 | 8 |
|
Andy, what is the cap you refer to?
As expressed, I too despise em but I haven't tried the Naturalamb
yet. I've never felt out of control or anything but they sure
as hell reduce the sensation (so to speak).
Hank
|
375.4 | | LESLIE::LESLIE | Andy ��� Leslie | Wed Sep 20 1989 18:08 | 12 |
| By "the cap" I meant the diaphragm. Placed over the neck of the womb
(a.k.a. the cervix) by the woman, it's a pretty effective
contraceptive device and can be put in place well in advance of the
sexual act, to be taken out hours later, perhaps the next morning.
It certainly beats the coitus interruptus effect of the condom. It is
completely ineffective in combatting the threat of a sexually
transmitted disease, (as opposed to a condom) but that doesn't sound
like the scenario of .0.
- ���
|
375.5 | | LESLIE::LESLIE | Andy ��� Leslie | Wed Sep 20 1989 18:11 | 5 |
| My wife just suggested that I also suggest use of the coil (aka an IUD,
Intra-Uterine Device). There are drawbacks, but they can be left in for
two years without worry.
- ���
|
375.7 | bouncing off the walls | AUNTB::PRESSLEY | pin heads are people too... | Thu Sep 21 1989 00:26 | 3 |
| withdraw mcgraw..of course you must have rhythm. background music
can help. The only reason I can think of to use a rubber is if
your on the 1-5 date.
|
375.8 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Sep 21 1989 00:32 | 40 |
| Note 324 contains excerpts of Consumer Reports' survey and testing of
condoms. The information there may be useful in selecting a different
brand.
The brand I've been using, since CR rated them tops in their 1979
survey, is Trojans Plus. I like them better than some of the other
styles I've tried.
Re: IUD
It's extremely difficult to get fitted for an IUD in the US nowadays,
mainly due to the many lawsuits against the makers of some of them.
In fact, I'm not sure that there are any models still available here.
Also, they don't always work - some women have no problems with them,
others can't use them.
Re: diaphragm
This is a nuisance too, especially when used the way it's supposed to.
They're often pesky to insert and the gel has to be added within an
hour before intercourse. (Seeing as I've acquired this data
second-hand, someone else may care to clarify or correct it.) And
some women have difficulty getting one that fits right or stays in
place.
Another method is the "sponge", sold in the US under the "Today"
brand. This is more convenient than the diaphragm and is about as
effective. It can be bought in stores and doesn't need a doctor
to fit. The disadvantages are that some women have difficulty
removing it, the possibility of Toxic Shock Syndrome, and the expense.
Condoms are relatively inexpensive, reliable when used properly, and
of course are the only contraceptive method that protects against
disease (latex condoms only). The lessening of sensitivity can
actually be an advantage in some situations. I think it's important
that men accept responsibility for contraception, and they should be
willing to use condoms if thir partner does not use an acceptable form
of contraception.
Steve
|
375.9 | | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Rebel without applause ... | Thu Sep 21 1989 02:32 | 7 |
| I recently heard a comedian talking about wearing condoms ... and
he said he wore 2 all the time ! So when he got amorous, he merely
took one off ... just a thought ... ;^}
Scary
|
375.10 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Sep 21 1989 09:36 | 5 |
| Re: .7
There's a name for men who follow your advice - fathers!
Steve
|
375.11 | XXXX | RUTLND::KUPTON | You can't get there from here | Thu Sep 21 1989 10:27 | 16 |
|
The biggest problem using condoms is getting over the pyscological
idea that there is something "between" you and your SO. Not being able
to achieve orgasm or ejaculation may be more in your head (90% of sex
is there) than under the rubber. Are you wearing it correctly??
Talk to your partner and discuss other alternatives for you to
attain sexual fulfillment. (ie: oral, anal, mutual masturbation etc)
Is she enjoying you with the condom?
I recommend that you buy a selection of types and use the one that
you BOTH can enjoy after trying 4 or 5.
Good Luck..
Ken
|
375.12 | | PAXVAX::DM_JOHNSON | is there life before death? | Thu Sep 21 1989 12:06 | 10 |
| I'd recommend talking to your partner about what you are feeling. It
can be mildly frustrating (oops - timeout - there!) but from a
sensitivity point of view there shouldn't be THAT much difference.
I'm guessing there is a psychological block. The best way of dealing
with that is to talk about it and figure out what to do about it.....
with your partner.
Try it, you'll like it.
Dj
|
375.13 | A slight digression | SSGBPM::KENAH | Haunted by demons who stole my soul | Thu Sep 21 1989 12:18 | 10 |
| Received this in the mail recently...
Reply 375.7 reminded me of it...
> Subj: Only in Italy
>
> I was at the supermarket the other day, and noticed a bunch of condoms
> for sale near the registers. One of the brands came in two sizes: the
> larger one (12 condoms instead of 3) was called the "family" size....
|
375.14 | It can be fun to use condoms | TLE::FISHER | Work that dream and love your life | Thu Sep 21 1989 13:01 | 38 |
|
I'm kind of surprised at all the negative stuff people have to say
about condoms. I've grown to really like them.
One bit of advice that I have is to put a little bit of lubricant on
your "tip" before you put on the condom (don't lubricate your shaft;
that causes the condom to slip off). That increases your sensitivity
during sex.
Another thing that really works is readjusting you and your
partner's "attitude" when putting the condom on. What I mean by this
is that I used to think of putting the condom on like this...
Sex, sex, sex, sex, sex...
Oh, okay, umm, stop, okay?
Where is that thing?
Okay, where is the lube? Okay, here it is.
Wait a minute, I gotta get the foil off.
(Hopefully there is still something there to put the condom on)
Okay, I'm ready now
(Attempt to "get back in the mood")
Sex, sex, sex, sex...
The advice that a lot of sex-perts give is to make the condom part of
your sex play so that it doesn't interrupt the flow of the love
making. What I do is I use playful talk about, "Gee, do you think I
should put a condom on?" and my partner might playfully ask me "Why?"
Then I might let him put the condom on me or something like that.
The point is to keep both partners engaged in the act of using the
condom and to keep it sexy and playful (talking sexy is easiest;
letting the partner "assist" in the operation is also a good way of
keeping it "hot").
Just some ideas. Feel free to take it or leave it.
--Ger
|
375.15 | Yes, out of control | IAMOK::GRAY | Follow a hawk. When it circles, you ... | Fri Sep 22 1989 11:28 | 35 |
|
.0> " out of control "
For three months, between the time my (soon to be ex) wife
got off of "the pill" and the conception of my son, we used
condoms. I eventually "got used to them" but never "enjoyed"
using them. I heard a comedian describe it as "taking a shower
with your rain coat on", and I agree.
I can relate to the "out of control" phrase. In my opinion,
it could be explained like this.
If you assume that having intercourse in the missionary
position is full body contact, then the most sensitive part of
that contact could be considered to take place at the
penis/vagina connection. If you also allow that you and your
partner regulate the progression of the love making in part,
through this warm all over feeling, then it works like a
thermometer or "means of control".
Now if you take that warm all over feeling and insulate
yourself from the most intense part of it, you are "out of
control". And I think you stay that way until you start using
some other primary means to "feel" what's happening.
Imagine learning to drive on a car without power steering
and then your first experience in a car that has it. For the
first few miles, you can't "feel the road". However, after a
while you get use to it, and everything is OK.
The key here is practice. Keep "doing it" and keep talking
to each other about it.
Just my $0.02
Richard
|
375.16 | | TLE::FISHER | Work that dream and love your life | Fri Sep 22 1989 12:11 | 30 |
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Entered anonymously for the author: (--GerAsModerator)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm the author of the basenote. Thank you all for the replies so far.
Let me say that my wife and I have considered the alternatives to
condoms, and for various reasons that they are not acceptable.
.1 When I said I felt out of control, I meant that I have difficulty
determining how far I may withdraw without leaving completely. I
can't feel where I am like I used to.
.14 Thanks for the tip lubricating tip.
I suppose it could be a psychological problem, but having just
switched to this method of birth control, I know that there is a
definite loss in sensitivity when I'm covered.
I think that we are handling the use of the condom well. We seem
to remain interested, and possibly get more interested when I put the
condom on because we know what's going to happen. My wife seems to be
enjoying herself as much as she used to without condoms. We have
talked about my feelings and that's one of the reasons I'm asking about
condoms in here.
It's good to hear that Ger (in .14) is beginning to enjoy using
condoms. I'd like to feel that way about using them too.
Thanks for your replies.
|
375.17 | Hmm multiple methods work better. | WOODRO::EARLY | Bob Early CSS/NSG Dtn 264-6252 | Fri Sep 22 1989 12:52 | 31 |
| re: .16
Use of other methods:
For many people, there is no real "ideal" method. At first, I too
resented the use of condoms, since (at that time) I felt it was
my wifes responsibility "not to get pregant"). However, she wanted
to get pregnant, so all methods tended to "fail". ;^) (in retrospect).
Through the milennia, I've managed to meet "at least" one person
who got pregnant using only ONE of the methods mentioned. TO be
sure no "unwanted" prgancy occurs, one might use several methods
(Cap, IUD, and spermicide inside the Cap or Condom.
I'm surprised this hasn't been mentioned yet (the 'odds' associated
with each method. However, DR. Ruth also supports this view of multiple
methods to "raise the certainty level of success in failing to
impregnate").
For personal reasons, condoms were very inconvenient for me to use,
however, in a recent article, it is estimated that it will cost about
$1,000,000 to raise a child to maturity and put it throug college (not
te mention all the other little joys that goes with it). Given this
alternative to effective birth control ... some of us are willin g to
put up with a LOT of "inconvenience". ;^)
Bob
|
375.18 | naturals are the least of the evils... | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | You've crossed over the river... | Fri Sep 22 1989 14:01 | 9 |
| re: sensitivity
I suggest shelling out for a more expensive, natural lambskin condom (like the
Naturalamb). They allow far more sensitivity, and are extremely unlikely
to break. The first time I used one, my wife said "I thought you put it on."
The heat transfer through the natural membrane is much better than through most
of the latex ones I've tried (plenty at this point).
The Doctah
|
375.19 | | RUTLND::RMAXFIELD | Immense expense is mainly in Defense. | Fri Sep 22 1989 15:47 | 8 |
| The natural lambskin condoms may be better on the sensitivity scale,
but they are actually more prone to breakage/leakage than
latex ones, especially when combined with certain non-water
soluble lubricants. If you're concerned as much about
prevention of pregnancy and/or disease as about sexual pleasure,
use the latex brands of condoms.
Richard
|
375.20 | | LESLIE::LESLIE | Andy ��� Leslie | Fri Sep 22 1989 16:05 | 3 |
| To be totally safe, use �thick rubber.
It's a question of degree. Naturalamb is pretty dam' safe.
|
375.21 | Different requirements for different people... | TLE::FISHER | Work that dream and love your life | Fri Sep 22 1989 16:14 | 22 |
|
> It's a question of degree. Naturalamb is pretty dam' safe.
I think that one point that is trying to be made is that, for some
people in some circumstances, Naturalamb is a no-no. For instance, as
a nonmonogomous gay man (where is that partner when I need him???),
Naturalamb is out. HIV can be transmitted through that type of
condom.
In one "safer-sex" presentation I went to, the facilitator suggested
that folks use two condoms; he said that the second condom didn't
additionally reduce sensitivity that much. I personally haven't tried
that, and I'm not sure that I will. I think I'd rather spend a few
seconds to put the darn thing on right the first time (most "failure"
is due to improper use).
For a married couple, HIV transmission probably isn't an issue (though
be careful with the type of lube you use), and Naturalamb might be
a good condom.
--Ger
|
375.22 | | AV8OR::EDECK | | Fri Sep 22 1989 17:29 | 3 |
|
Some condoms are coated with a spermicide like nonoxydol-9,
which increases their effectiveness in birth control.
|
375.23 | | SX4GTO::HOLT | hello, meet my iguana... | Sat Sep 23 1989 00:03 | 4 |
|
re lube
Especially don't ever use salted butter... she'll hate you for it!
|
375.24 | | LESLIE::LESLIE | Andy ��� Leslie | Sat Sep 23 1989 13:44 | 10 |
| Aaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrggggggggghhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!! Hurts to THINK of
it.
Double cream is okay....
:-)))))
- ���
|
375.26 | SKINDEEP | RUTLND::KUPTON | You can't get there from here | Mon Sep 25 1989 10:57 | 40 |
| For the sake of humor.....
See the movie "SKINDEEP". John Ritter and another man (Rock
Singer) are after the same woman. She insists that her lover wear
protection. The place is pitch black and a luminescint blue appendage
strolls to the bed from the right. The rocker comes in, Ritter hides in
the closet, the Rocker gets angry and leaves. Ritter comes back out
(pitch blck again) with the lighted blue condom on, the rocker comes
back in with a lighted red one. It's probably one of the funnier "Safe
Sex" messages I've seen.
BTW: They get into a scuffle and both are arrested for: <Hit next
unseen>
'Cockfighting'
Ken
|
375.27 | | BRADOR::HATASHITA | | Wed Sep 27 1989 15:04 | 6 |
| re. .26
I was waiting for the woman to say,
"That's nice. But I wanted a Bud Lite!"
|
375.29 | | AWARD2::HARMON | | Wed Sep 27 1989 21:24 | 9 |
| Re: .26
The scene you describe in SKINDEEP was the funniest I've seen and still
laugh when I think of it. It was really nice to see that Hollywood is
finally addressing safe sex. Humor can be a good teacher. (Do they
really make them in fluorescent colors?)
P.
|
375.30 | | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Rebel without applause ... | Tue Oct 03 1989 03:27 | 8 |
| It was also addressed in "Naked Gun" .... when the couple said that
they both practiced safe sex, then the next scene showed 2 people
huigging while wearing head to toe condoms ... guess that would
be about as safe as you could get !
Jerry
|
375.31 | | MAMIE::KEITH | Real men double clutch | Thu Oct 05 1989 13:51 | 3 |
| And camoflaged also!
Steve
|
375.32 | Snip,snip.don't worry,be happy ! | ELWOOD::GROLEAU | STILL, spit'n into the wind | Thu Oct 05 1989 14:48 | 1 |
|
|
375.33 | RE: .32 snip, snip won't stop AIDS, AIDS!! | ANT::BUSHEE | Living on Blues Power | Thu Oct 12 1989 12:25 | 1 |
|
|
375.34 | new size | AQUA::RILEY | | Thu Oct 12 1989 14:54 | 15 |
|
I heard on the radio this morning that the nation's leading
condom manufacturer will begin marketing a 20% larger condom.
This is to make their product more appealing and boost sales.
I wonder if this is just a marketing ploy to directed at men's
ego's, or if there really is such a need in the market.
Shouldn't there also be a need for a smaller size as well? What man
would go to the pharmacy and pick up the package that had
NEW!!! 20% SMALLER!!! plastered all over the box. I wonder
if the larger size will cost more than the regular size, to....uh.....
keep up with inflation.
George
|
375.35 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Oct 12 1989 14:57 | 6 |
| I'd actually worry about that. It's important that the condom fit
right to seal properly. I have never read that a size larger than the one
normally sold in the US was needed, though I have read that smaller sizes
are sold in some countries.
Steve
|
375.36 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | The trigger doesn't pull the finger | Thu Oct 12 1989 15:17 | 4 |
| Those "Magnum" condoms are already around. Don't know what the heck I'd
need one for. :-)* 100000
The Doctah
|
375.37 | What are magnums good for ? | SA1794::CHARBONND | It's a hardship post | Thu Oct 12 1989 16:42 | 4 |
| Easy, let your date find the *empty* box, then say "Well,
they fit OK, but weren't sensitive enough, so I switched
to brand xyz " >>:-)
|
375.38 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Oct 12 1989 17:23 | 13 |
| Reminds me of a joke that goes something like this...
An American manufacturer of condoms contacted the State Department in
a tizzy. Seems the Soviets had ordered several hundred thousand condoms
to be issued to the Red Army soldiers. It wasn't the size of the order
that had them worried, but the specifications, which called for each
condom to be of enormous size - nearly double the usual American size.
The State Department official thought for a moment, and then responded
"Sure, go ahead and make them for the Russkies. But on each one,
print 'Texas Medium'."
Steve
|
375.39 | Women are just as bad as men. | SSDEVO::GALLUP | The sun sets in Arizona, Flagstaff to be exact | Thu Oct 12 1989 22:41 | 12 |
|
At a local bar in Colorado Springs, there are condom machines
in both bathrooms...the men's bathroom's machine says "Extra
Large" on it, and the machine in the women's bathroom says
"Extra Small."
All the women get a real kick outta it! (If you could only
hear the discussions....)
kat
|
375.40 | Extra small? | HANNAH::MODICA | | Fri Oct 13 1989 12:05 | 5 |
|
Ok kath, how do you know what's in the men's bathroom?
Inquiring minds wanna know. :-)
Hank
|
375.41 | Anonymous reply - New and Improved? | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Oct 13 1989 15:32 | 16 |
| The following reply is from a member of our community who wishes to remain
anonymous.
Monday morning, I decided to start the week off on a good note. I had
previously bought a package of the new (and improved?) Trojan-enz. After
intercourse, I noticed a sharp pain at the opening of my urethra. The
pain lasted for several hours, and was rather disconcerting, to say the
least. Now my little friend is rather wary of donning another "pain-maker."
I can't say I blame him!
Have any of you had any problems of this nature with the new Trojan-enz?
I am wondering if the pain was unrelated to the use of the different condom,
but I'd prefer not to make the same mistake twice.
Thanks for taking this seriously.
|
375.42 | | STARCH::WHALEN | There are no words for these times | Fri Oct 13 1989 22:36 | 7 |
| The only times when I've noticed some soreness afterwards is when I
didn't urinate shortly afterwards. My suspicion is that some of those
chemicals get near the sensitive mucous membranes, and irritate them.
Urinating helps flush them out, so that they don't cause the
irritation.
Rich
|
375.43 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Sat Oct 14 1989 14:06 | 6 |
| You may want to try the Trojans Plus, which use a "dry" lubricant,
though I've never experienced discomfort from any style or brand
that I've tried. I have not really liked the ones with a gel
lubricant.
Steve
|
375.44 | Just call me Pee-Wee | ATSE::KATZ | | Mon Oct 16 1989 11:24 | 19 |
| I was really tickled by the last item referring to pain. It's not that
I am sadistic, but the way that Steve began to speak for the "little friend".
I am imagining my little guy sitting here right now in the dark, feeling safe
and protected, comfortable. Wondering when the time is right for feeling proud
and ready for action. Then also, it won't really be that guy that will be running
the show, although he gets to call for a time out, and even signals when to
charge ! Sometimes he's just so tired of doing nothing, that he seems to be
wanting to remind me that he's still in working order.
On the serious side, I think you might have to wait and see whether any
other situations bring about pain. Unfortunately, there are infections that can
cause it. Ouch.
I recall feeling sore after running into a Copper-T coil that was not
inserted quite deep enough. It happened a few times. I think there was a string
that could be pushed up and out of the way, but would come down between visits.
I don't know if anyone uses those anymore.
Hope you can figure it out quickly.
|
375.45 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | The trigger doesn't pull the finger | Mon Oct 16 1989 11:25 | 8 |
| >I have not really liked the ones with a gel
> lubricant.
This always brings about the dilemma- where do I wipe my hands? I have taken to
bringing a small towel bedside.
The Doctah
|
375.46 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Oct 16 1989 11:48 | 10 |
| Re: .44
> I was really tickled by the last item referring to pain. It's not that
> I am sadistic, but the way that Steve began to speak for the "little friend".
Just a reminder - I didn't write that note - I only posted it on behalf
of an anonymous author. I suppose I should make myself a MENNOTES_MODERATOR
username....
Steve
|
375.47 | | SX4GTO::HOLT | Robert Holt ISV Atelier West | Mon Oct 16 1989 19:26 | 2 |
|
so glad I don't have to worry about this nonsense...
|
375.48 | Another idea... | TLE::FISHER | Work that dream and love your life | Wed Nov 01 1989 14:48 | 14 |
|
RE Pain
Did you pinch the tip of the condom as you were putting it on? Even
with tipped condoms, you might want to pinch the tip when putting one
on; that allows some extra space (but don't put air in there!) between
the tip and the Eurethra (sp?). Maybe that would reduce the contact
between the condom and the opening.
...but maybe you already did this.
--Ger
|
375.49 | Clarification | TLE::FISHER | Work that dream and love your life | Wed Nov 01 1989 15:31 | 14 |
|
RE .48 Disclaimer
I guess a better phrase than "pinch" would be "gently press with the
fleshy parts of your finger." If you pinch with your nails, you might
puncture the condom; don't do that.
I was just trying to suggest leaving some extra room at the end of the
condom, that's all. The "gently pressing" part makes sure that an air
bubble doesn't get into the tip; air bubbles can break during sex.
--Ger
|
375.50 | | AV8OR::TATISTCHEFF | Lee T | Thu Nov 16 1989 18:58 | 10 |
| re .44
the string from a copper t (iud) and copper 7 is actually a nylon
monofilament, with the same texture as the part of the fishing line you
tie a hook to. it is supposed to soften slightly and wrap around the
cervix after awhile, but mine never seem to.
the string can be trimmed if necessary, but if you're running into the
string, you are probably banging her cervix which is not the most
pleasant sensation for many women (like me!).
|
375.51 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | The age of fire's at hand | Fri Nov 17 1989 15:34 | 16 |
| >it is supposed to soften slightly and wrap around the
> cervix after awhile, but mine never seem to.
I suspect there is a critical length which the string must be cut to. If too
long or too short, it just doesn't ever get out of the way. And the one my wife
had did NOT feel like monofilament. (Oh, it probably was, but sure didn't
feel like it).
> the string can be trimmed if necessary, but if you're running into the
> string, you are probably banging her cervix which is not the most
> pleasant sensation for many women (like me!).
This is intuitive (if you think about it for a minute), but thanks for saying
that. I found out the hard way about the string from a IUD. Ouch!
The Doctah
|
375.52 | | AV8OR::TATISTCHEFF | Lee T | Wed Nov 22 1989 00:11 | 4 |
| re .51
if it's not a monofilament, it's EXTREMELY dangerous - but they haven't
sold them with anything but monofilaments since the dacron shield.
|
375.53 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | As you merged, power surged- together | Wed Nov 22 1989 08:08 | 6 |
| Well, it's been out for a long time now. And my wife has given birth to a baby
since then, so I guess the danger period is probably passed. (It seems to me it
was a copper wire, and it had been in there for awhile). Can't remember. Thanks
for the info, though.
The Doctah
|
375.54 | Don't be a slob! | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | As you merged, power surged- together | Mon Nov 27 1989 15:53 | 9 |
| FYI-
The lubricant used in pre-lubricated condoms is very bad on furniture finish.
Be very careful not to allow any of the lubricant to drip, say, on a nightstand,
or you will have a corresponding area with no finish whatsoever. Perhaps
they should bottle this stuff to use as furniture stripper- it works better
than anything else I ever used (intentionally, that is).
The Doctah
|
375.55 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Nov 27 1989 21:47 | 10 |
| Re: .54
That's interesting - I wonder what is in it that made it do that.
What brand had this effect? The lubricant is supposed to be
water-based.
One thing I like about the dry lubricants (such as in Trojans Plus)
is that they aren't messy.
Steve
|
375.56 | | BRADOR::HATASHITA | | Tue Nov 28 1989 02:08 | 4 |
| Maybe it wasn't the lubricant. Excessive heat can strip varnish
as well.
Kris
|
375.57 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | As you merged, power surged- together | Tue Nov 28 1989 08:05 | 2 |
| It was the lubricant from the Trojan Naturalamb condoms. Good thing it wasn't
expensive furniture. :-)
|
375.58 | New Zip Strip condoms... | HSSWS1::GREG | The Texas Chainsaw | Sat Dec 02 1989 11:20 | 10 |
| re: .57 (Doc)
It may not have been the lubricant that ate away your
furniture's finish. It might have been the spermacide.
Be that as it may, one has to wonder why you would leave
an exposed condom on your nightstand in the first place.
I think that speaks badly of your housekeeping habits. ;^)
- Greg
|
375.59 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | As you merged, power surged- together | Mon Dec 04 1989 08:44 | 5 |
| It wasn't the condom itself, it was the package which was hastily left on
the nightstand. :-) I had reason to devote my attention elsewhere at the time.
;^)
Doc
|
375.60 | crowbar? | XCUSME::KRUY | There Ain't No Justice | Tue Jan 02 1990 21:08 | 10 |
|
As a humourous footnote, as I was reading notes tonight, the note
that was "next/unseen" following this was 365, titled:
"I got it on, now how do I get it off"
-sjk
|
375.61 | I like an adventure. | FTMUDG::RAYER | You were my only cuddly toy.(sp) | Mon Apr 02 1990 16:04 | 9 |
| I can remember tring a rubber in high school. If any of you seen Hollywood
Nights you know what I mean. The scene with the guy and his girl in the van.
Promissed myself never again.
I spent 4 years in the service and still would'nt use one. Thank god most of
the things you could come down with where cureable with a shot. Now days I
would be scared to death with whats out there.
|