T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
271.1 | | RANCHO::HOLT | I came, I saw, I threw up... | Fri Sep 02 1988 00:38 | 6 |
|
I haven't gotten any catcalls from any women for several weeks
now. A leer or 2 while out running, maybe...
Nebbechs who do it are crude and undignified boors, and they make
women *even more* hostile to men in general.
|
271.2 | oh brother.. | SALEM::AMARTIN | Right Wing Yankee Yuppie Yahoo! | Fri Sep 02 1988 01:24 | 9 |
| Ditto on that last para Mr Holt.
I DO think that she is going a little too far though...
If she doesnt like it then she should say something about it IF
IT HAPPENS TO HER or even whilst she is present.
FWIW: If this is the same woman I say in the Herald a couple of
weeks ago, I tend to wonder about the man that would "CATCALL" HER!
|
271.3 | understand?????? | CVETTE::GONZALES | Don't drink that ..... it's POISON! | Fri Sep 02 1988 08:28 | 15 |
|
Well, being a woman, I can relate to the catcall question. Let's
see if you can understand this one.
Ok - before, when I didn't have my (a) boyfriend I used to love
it when I got catcalls. I'd turn around and say something back
or just smile and the guys and flirt a little. Used to make me
feel real good! Now that I have Jamie, it disgusts me when someone
gives me a catcall! I usually turn around and give them a rotten
look or just ignore them and keep walking. Sometimes if I'm really
upset by it, I flip 'em the bird and call them perverts!!
Tracy
|
271.4 | Barbaric | PCCAD1::RICHARDJ | Bluegrass,Music Aged to Perfection | Fri Sep 02 1988 08:55 | 5 |
|
Isn't a catcall another, (although crude), way of complimenting a womans
looks.
Jim
|
271.5 | Art appreciation. | ULTRA::BUTCHART | | Fri Sep 02 1988 09:01 | 10 |
| re .4:
Yup, and slobbering on the Mona Lisa is another, (although crude)
way of showing your appreciation for art. The Italian authorities
would probably not be amused, however.
Not all displays of appreciation are percieved equally, particularly
intrusive ones.
/Dave
|
271.6 | | LEZAH::BOBBITT | invictus maneo | Fri Sep 02 1988 09:12 | 42 |
| Well. Let's see. I can say I might tolerate or be mildly flattered
by a wolf whistle (depending on my mood). I am not playing miss
high-and-mighty here, I just feel very uncomfortable being noticed
like this, since it's a new concept to me. If someone should remark
in passing that they find me attractive and I feel unthreatened
by the situation (I generally don't advocate encouraging strangers
in this manner), I may smile quietly, or thank them, and leave it at that.
But comments to the effect of certain bodily parts I happen to possess,
and what the construction workers would like to do to them, piss
me off. Exclamation point.
Certainly a cat can look at a king (or a construction worker can look
at extremely attractive passing women)....but they shouldn't be too
vocal if they happen to have any sexually specific thoughts. That is
downright offensive.
If this woman were to complain to the men vocally, it would do no
good, they'd just laugh at her, or even increase the catcalling.
Of course, she could threaten their company with sexual harassment
suits if she really wanted them to stop. Then again, why doesn't
she just avoid the construction site?
And another thing, I know a man who does construction-type work,
and him and his buddies go cruising at lunch every day to gaze at
the women out walking. And they notice that some of the women are
very attractively packaged. And they notice that some of the women
are out strolling at the *particular* time they drive by every
day...and generally in the same place. Some women seem to *want*
to be ogled, and dress for the situation, and jiggle and sway most
provacatively as they walk. Obviously they are trying to get a
reaction. But most women don't fall into this category, and would
rather any explicit remarks go unheard.
As for my appreciation of passing men, it is generally in the form
of a glance to a female friend with raised eyebrows, indicating
"wow, did you see that?". Or sometimes, once they're out of earshot,
I will purr appreciatively in the back of my throat. Nothing too
vocal, I assure you.
-Jody
|
271.7 | only in groups | BPOV02::MACKINNON | | Fri Sep 02 1988 09:37 | 6 |
|
Why is it that men who shout catcalls only do so when they are in
a group of other men? They never shout anything if they are
alone. Do they need the security of the group? Any ideas!
Mi
|
271.8 | | CVETTE::GONZALES | Don't drink that ..... it's POISON! | Fri Sep 02 1988 09:42 | 14 |
|
>> Why is it that men who shout catcalls only do so when they <<
>> are in a group other men?? <<
I don't find that true. I have been walking down the street, gotten
a catcall, and seen only one person in the car.
Tracy
|
271.9 | safety in numbers | STEREO::FLIS | missed me | Fri Sep 02 1988 09:58 | 12 |
| re: .8
But, notice that he was in a *car* (eg: tool of escape). A single
man sitting on a step probably wouldn't catcall because if he did
the woman involved may confront him ONE ON ONE. There is safety
in numbers (or with a bonafide method of escape), all to avoid the
possibility of a one-on-one confrontation.
I think what it boils down to is ONE) insecurity and TWO) displaying
ones "manhood"(?) to ones peers.
jim
|
271.10 | I'm Flattered | PCCAD1::RICHARDJ | Bluegrass,Music Aged to Perfection | Fri Sep 02 1988 10:05 | 6 |
| Hey listen men have to put up with things too. I just came back
from the cafeteria and two women were looking at me and one of them
wanted me I guess. I heard her tell the other woman, "Get him".
Should I go to personel ?
Jim
|
271.11 | | WMOIS::B_REINKE | As true as water, as true as light | Fri Sep 02 1988 10:06 | 3 |
| An overheard remark isn't the same as getting yelled at rudely.
Bonnie
|
271.12 | Mountain out of molehill? | GRANMA::MWANNEMACHER | | Fri Sep 02 1988 10:36 | 13 |
| I think that people are reading too much into this. I don't see
anything wrong with a whistle or an "I think I'm in love" or something
like that. I do think that when people start getting obscene, it's
taking it too far. I don't think that it's insecurity or anything
else. I worked construction for ten years before coming to digital
and have seen many catcalls made by the construction workers and
at the construction workers. Most of them were clean and aprreciative
of the other persons looks. Most of them were recieved quite well
by both the women and men. (Actually all were recieved well by
the men) I think to start psychoanalyzing this practice is a bit
much. As long as its done in good taste, go for it.
Mike
|
271.13 | Try reading from the other persons perspective | WMOIS::B_REINKE | As true as water, as true as light | Fri Sep 02 1988 10:44 | 5 |
| Some of you who think that catcalls are just good clean fun
might want to take a look at how the same subject is being
treated in womannotes.
Bonnie
|
271.14 | No thanks, I've seen it in action | GRANMA::MWANNEMACHER | | Fri Sep 02 1988 11:04 | 7 |
| I'd rather go on what I've seen in my own experiences. I'm sure
people have had bad experiences, however, from what I've seen (and
it's been quite a lot), these incidents are very much in the minority.
Let's not confuse people who catcall with perverts, there's a BIG
difference.
Mike
|
271.15 | | CSSE::HAKIM | | Fri Sep 02 1988 11:54 | 3 |
| They are as primitive and obnoxious as the people who utter them.
It also seems that this uncivilized behaviour does not distinguish
race, color, creed or socio-economic strata.
|
271.16 | Mistaken Maybe ? | PCCAD1::RICHARDJ | Bluegrass,Music Aged to Perfection | Fri Sep 02 1988 12:26 | 5 |
| Why is it always constrution sites that are brought up on this subject.
If wonder if the construction workers whistling to the crane operator
are mistaken for catcalls ?
Jim
|
271.17 | what ever | WMOIS::B_REINKE | As true as water, as true as light | Fri Sep 02 1988 12:27 | 7 |
| in re .14
Well, Mike, I'm sorry that you feel that way. However, I would
suggest that anyone who wants to know how catcalls are experienced
by women take a look at the note in womannotes.
Bonnie
|
271.18 | | SEDJAR::THIBAULT | Expecting to Fly | Fri Sep 02 1988 12:53 | 7 |
| It's a very rare occasion when I can take my evening stroll without having
someone yell something nasty at me. Unfortunately, I don't live near a
quiet country road where I wouldn't have to put up with it. I've learned
to block it out for the most part, but it's the *holes that throw things
that really piss me off.
Jenna
|
271.19 | Suggestions? | FRAGLE::TATISTCHEFF | Lee T | Fri Sep 02 1988 12:54 | 9 |
| re .14, Mike
� Let's not confuse people who catcall with perverts, there's a BIG
� difference.
And how, pray tell, does one tell the difference between a cat-call
from a "safe" guy and one from a pervert?
Lee
|
271.20 | corgerraloadathatthen | UNTADH::ODIJP | Or is this a canoe in my mouth ? | Fri Sep 02 1988 14:28 | 17 |
|
I'm writing this before reading the others 'cos my train's about
to arrive so sorry if it's already been said squillions of times.
Do I catcall (wolfwhistle to ze Eeeengleeeeeeesh) ? No
Why ? I get embarrassed
Why ? I can't whistle very well
I don't see anything wrong with it all . Lewd or suggestive remarks
are different . Unless the other person is 'asking' for it .
Women generally don't (I think you'll agree that *some* do) .
So they shouldn't have to suffer for it .
Gotta go
John J
|
271.21 | | IAMOK::KOSKI | It's in the way that you use it | Fri Sep 02 1988 14:31 | 14 |
| RE catcalls in general: As long as they are not leud comments I
think they are just silly ways the "boys" express themselves. I
don't take offense to them, and usually can't help smiling because
I just think they're silly. The leud ones best go ignored, no reason
to bring further attention to yourself my arguing the point.
I've always gotten the feeling that the woman that protest the loudest
about how terrible the catcalls are, are usually the one that never
get the catcalls. Funny how that works. (I'll get the wrath of the
womansnoters on this one)
Gail
|
271.23 | | VIDEO::MODICA | | Fri Sep 02 1988 15:43 | 8 |
| RE: .21
Thats kinda how I look at it. The silly ones are harmless and
usually meant in a jesting kind of way. The lewd ones however I
think are just plain disrepectful and I catagorize those with
racial/sexist slurs; uncalled for and unnecessary.
I also agree with your last paragraph, generally speaking of course.
|
271.24 | Lookin good | GRANMA::MWANNEMACHER | | Fri Sep 02 1988 16:31 | 12 |
| RE.19 I'm sure most people can make that distinction. Anything
lewd, in my opinion, is perverse. Whistling, hey beautiful, I think
I'm in love, etc, is in good fun.
RE:.21 I love the way you presented that. I think most are meant
as compliments. The ones that are lewd, don't deserve a reaction.
Bonnie, all I was saying is that I'm sure people have had bad
experiences with this, however, most are meant as a compliment (not
the lewd ones) and should be taken that way.
Mike
|
271.26 | little do you know | WMOIS::B_REINKE | As true as water, as true as light | Fri Sep 02 1988 17:40 | 4 |
| yeah, Eagles, and if they do 'come on over' they'll find that
you've been there all along! :-)
Bonnie
|
271.27 | | RANCHO::HOLT | I smell a rancid corn dog! | Fri Sep 02 1988 21:30 | 2 |
|
They have Suzanne ready to spring from ambush, so lookout! -;
|
271.28 | GIVE ME A BREAK... | WFOV12::ANNINO | | Fri Sep 02 1988 22:39 | 12 |
|
I USUALLY DON'T RESPOND, BUT THIS ONE I FEEL STRONGLY ABOUT.
WHEN I SEE A WOMAN WHO HAS TAKEN THE TIME TO LOOK LIKE A WOMAN I
AM THE FIRST ONE TO "CAT CALL." BY THAT I DONT MEAN SAYING SOMETHING
TO ENTERTAIN MY BUDDIES, OR SOMETHING TO DEGRADE THE WOMAN. WHAT
I DO IS DIRECT A SHORT PHRASE OF APPRECIATION TO THE WOMAN. AND
IN ALL THE TIME I HAVE DONE IT, I HAVE NEVER BEEN MET WITH DIRTY
LOOKS OR NEGATIVE COMMENTS OF ANY KIND. I THINK THAT A FEMALE WHO
PRESENTS HERSELF AS A LADY, HAS ENOUGH CLASS TO ACCEPT AN
APPRECIATIVE REMARK AS NOTHING MORE OR LESS THAN THAT.
CHUCK
|
271.29 | not the same thing | WMOIS::B_REINKE | As true as water, as true as light | Fri Sep 02 1988 23:33 | 5 |
| an appreciative remark, from a friend or a known person, is
wonderful and welcome.. that's not what I would call a 'catcall'
however.
Bonnie
|
271.31 | | COMET::BRUNO | C'mon George, DEBATE! | Sat Sep 03 1988 01:38 | 6 |
| Re: .30
Only if he doesn't have hairy knuckles, a trenchcoat and pantlegs
tied on above the knee.
Greg
|
271.32 | it depends... | WMOIS::B_REINKE | As true as water, as true as light | Sat Sep 03 1988 21:06 | 17 |
| in re .30
mike,
in a safe environment, yes,
i.e. if I am walking down the hall at work and you pass me and
think I look very nice and say, 'hey, you look really sharp'..
I will feel very flattered!
if I am walking down the street and a man hollers something at me
from a car or a group of guys yell something at me, I'll be
frightened and nervous and very uncomfortable.
does that make sense?
Bonnie
|
271.33 | apples and apples | TUNER::FLIS | missed me | Sat Sep 03 1988 22:54 | 14 |
| > i.e. if I am walking down the hall at work and you pass me and
> think I look very nice and say, 'hey, you look really sharp'..
> I will feel very flattered!
Now, how about if you are walking down the street and a man passes
you says 'hey, you look really sharp'?
In your note .32 you changed not only the environment but the comment
and the manner in which it was delivered. This is apples and oranges!
comments?
jim
|
271.34 | Oh! What just came in the door! | MCIS2::POLLITZ | | Sat Sep 03 1988 23:02 | 7 |
| Well, here goes " WHIRRRIIII WHIRRIILLLL"
AH, now I feel better.
Russ
|
271.35 | try again.. | WMOIS::B_REINKE | As true as water, as true as light | Sat Sep 03 1988 23:26 | 13 |
| in re .33 in re .32
what I meant was that a lot of how a woman, (or at least
this woman) takes things, depends on the situation..
if I feel safe, a nice remark from a strange man is welcome..
if I don't, even the nicest remark can make me a bit nervous
does that make any more sense to you?
b
|
271.37 | | WMOIS::MACKAY | | Tue Sep 06 1988 12:51 | 9 |
| I heard a young woman get a catcall that was REALLY lewd by some
guy in a car with some other dimwits. Even I was shocked and embarassed
by it. I yelled over to her "I hope you don't think all men are like
that" and she yelled back to me that she didn't.
There's a difference between responding in a natural way at being
knocked out of your socks by someone who is attractive to you and
this kind of antisocial behavior.
|
271.39 | AN EGO BOOST IN THE RIGHT CONTEXT! | NYEM1::COHEN | aka JayCee...I LOVE the METS & #8! | Tue Sep 06 1988 14:48 | 9 |
| I just came back from lunch, and had a few cute construction workers
"cat-call" as I walked by...and they made my day. Now, don't get
me wrong...I don't think that lewd and disgusting remarks made at
ANYONE is appropriate, but an occasional whistle, and a "don't you
look lovely" statement can boost my ego ANY day!!!!
Jill
|
271.40 | | WMOIS::MACKAY | | Tue Sep 06 1988 15:09 | 16 |
| I think the question of "who is attractive" being a learned response
is a topic unto itself. Is this one of those questions like "How
has Hollywood changed our definition of attractiveness"?
To get back on track with the topic though there are different ways of
expressing one's initial attraction, and there seems to be quite a
range between the possible extremes. Smiling to someone who has
caught your eye is probably well-received by most (but not all) people.
Winking is a little more suggestive.
Likewise, there is a large variety of catcalls ranging from howls
to wolf whistles to lewd remarks.
Personally, I've never minded catcalls to me by women. Kinda liked
it as a matter of fact. But if anyone were to yell about a part
of my anatomy I'd be fuming.
|
271.41 | IN RESPONSE TO .29 | WFOV11::ANNINO | | Tue Sep 06 1988 19:11 | 6 |
|
I WAS NOT REFERRING ONLY TO WOMEN WHO ARE ACQUAINTANCES. AND
MAYBE MY MESSAGE WAS UNCLEAR. PLEASE, LET ME REPHRASE. THE TYPE
OF COMMENT OR THE ORIGINATOR OF THE COMMENT SHOULD BE EVALUATED
BY THE RECIPIENT. IF IT IS AN APPRECIATIVE COMMENT, TREAT IT AS
SUCH, AND IF IT IS TRASH...
|
271.42 | Just another opinion | RATTLE::MONAHAN | | Wed Sep 07 1988 15:51 | 9 |
| I don't mind the cat calls if I'm in my car and can drive right
pass the guys, but when I have to *walk* past them, I get real nervous!
(Unless I'm with friends. Then I'll just flirt right back!)
But, I take them as a compliment. I do feel, however, that some
guys need to be more subtle.
|
271.43 | bruised ego , perhaps ? | UNTADI::ODIJP | Come up an be me sometime ! | Thu Sep 08 1988 08:03 | 20 |
| Re .40
Doesn't that rather depend on *what* they said about part of your
anatomy .
I remember two women in a car asking *VERY* loudly how I managed
to have such a cute bottom . Not to me , but to each other .
Embarrassed or what ?!?
But it certainly made *my* day .
Of course , if they'd said "I bet you've got zits on yer ass" I'd
probably be a bit miffed . Whatever happens , we all have the right
of reply .
Excercise it .
John J
|
271.44 | Cross posted from Womannotes | CLBMED::KLEINBERGER | Dont worry, Be happy | Thu Sep 08 1988 19:01 | 17 |
| Well, I guess I'll be the one person who doesn't agree...
I have worked REALLY hard in the last year to make myself look good...
physically... Coming down from 250 pounds was not an easy thing
to do... I have gone from a size 28 to a size 11/12 (small/med
depending on what it is now)... I have worked hard with my beautician
to make my hair just the right color to match my skin... I've learned
the tricks with makeup, so that it doesn't look like I have any
on, but compliments my face...
When I walk by a group of guys, and I hear a *yo baby*, or a whistle
- IT MAKES ME FEEL GOOD inside... yeah, I know, inside I am still
the same person, and those making the comments would have to know
the *real* me to know me... but still after ALL the hard work (and
I'm not done yet!!), its nice to hear the catcalls...
Just a 6 cents worth...
|
271.45 | No thanks, I had my fill already | ONFIRE::BARBER | Skyking Tactical Services | Wed Sep 14 1988 16:22 | 7 |
|
RE .13 No need, I am very well aware what the bash club's
opinion is of anything that a man does. Since we're
all and always wrong for and about everything it would
be a waist of time.
Bob B
|
271.47 | I suspose it depends on your point of view | WMOIS::B_REINKE | As true as water, as true as light | Wed Sep 14 1988 22:39 | 17 |
| gee Bob, I'm sorry you think we are a bunch of (strident dirt
bags???) what evers...
all I thought was - if men want to know what a reasonably wide
variety of women think about cat calls, that they would like to
read the notes in both files.
me I found them frightening when I got them in the streets as a
young woman, (not counting here, remarks in a safe environment
from men who are familar or friends)....but I suspose that since
I am over 40 and am no longer thin, that the reason I don't like
cat calls is that I don't get them any more and am jealous of
those who do...
sigh
Bonnie
|
271.48 | This PIGS for you! :-) | SALEM::AMARTIN | The Armed Citizen = ME! | Wed Sep 14 1988 23:15 | 9 |
| Here Bonnie....
RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRooooooooooorrrrrrrrrrrrr. (simulated catcall)
:-)
Strident Dirt bags???? Hmmmmm
Wide Variety??? In what context??? Opinions? or geographically?
(sp)
I tend to ...never mind....would only head straight to the rathole..
|
271.49 | oh.... | WMOIS::B_REINKE | As true as water, as true as light | Thu Sep 15 1988 10:23 | 1 |
| Gee, thanks Al, (I think) :-)
|
271.50 | Way off the mark, Ace | HANDY::MALLETT | Foole | Thu Sep 22 1988 13:03 | 25 |
| re: .45
� RE .13 No need, I am very well aware what the bash club's
� opinion is of anything that a man does. Since we're
� all and always wrong for and about everything it would
� be a waist of time.
Since you haven't read those opinions, how is it that you "know"
all this? Your's is a very prejudiced sounding remark. As a matter
of pure fact, there is a fairly wide divergence of opinion in that
conference about catcalls. All in all, yours was one of the most
blatant overgeneralizations I've seen in NOTES in many a moon.
What is true about that conference and others as well, is that
when someone makes a gross generalization based solely on opinion,
there will usually follow replies that point out such logical
fallacies. To make a remark that ". . .we're all and always
wrong for and about everything. . ." amounts to closing your
eyes to the truth. Lots of men including myself and one of the
co-mods of this conference have often been told that our thoughts
and opinions are welcome and valued. And this is fact, not
opinion.
Steve
|
271.51 | In my opinion... | BETSY::WATSON | No_Mad | Tue Sep 27 1988 10:26 | 17 |
| re: .50
First, you say:
> What is true about that conference and others as well, is that
> when someone makes a gross generalization based solely on opinion,
Then you continue:
> ................... Lots of men including myself and one of the
> co-mods of this conference have often been told that our thoughts
> and opinions are welcome and valued. And this is fact, not
> opinion.
A guy expresses his opinion and you write it off as "opinion", then state
that "opinions are welcome and valued".
Make up your mind.
Kip
|
271.52 | | HANDY::MALLETT | Foole | Wed Sep 28 1988 11:06 | 24 |
| re: .51
The difference is that those who've been told that their
remarks are welcome usually do so without making generalizations
that are based soley on opinion. In fact, it's rare that these
folks make gross generalizations at all.
Comments such as "All x are always y. . ." are usually challenged,
particularly when there is obvious factual evidence to the contrary.
There's a world of difference between:
"I feel that some noters in this confernce have the attitude that
all x are y."
and
"In this conference the attitude is that all x are y."
Does that help clarify my remarks?
Steve
|
271.53 | re: -1 | BETSY::WATSON | No_Mad | Wed Sep 28 1988 12:17 | 10 |
| re: .52
> Does that help clarify my remarks?
Somewhat. Thanks for the response.
When someone says "Well, that's *your* opinin" it really gets me. When a
person speaks, it's obvious who's opinion it is. (Same idea when someone
begins a sentence with "Well, in *my* opinion"...)
Kip
|
271.54 | ...but what if? | COMET::BRUNO | Broccoli-based life form | Thu Sep 29 1988 00:59 | 5 |
| Well in *my* opinion, starting a sentence this way is better
than asserting that the following comment was fact (though
unsupported).
Grog
|
271.55 | How To Go Down A Rathole 101 | BETSY::WATSON | No_Mad | Fri Sep 30 1988 12:06 | 4 |
| So, someone states an opinion, not implying it's fact, and someone else
infers that's what they meant.
Kip
|
271.56 | Cat-calling as a group dynamic | HELIO::PELLEGRINI | | Fri Sep 30 1988 18:34 | 19 |
|
Concerning a previous note which asked why cat-calling behavior
seemed to be confined to groups of men, I reference a later note
in which a woman stated that she was uncomfortable when she received
a cat-call while alone, but "flirted right back" when with others.
The men engage in cat-calling because they have the support of their
group. The women encourage cat-calling by responding favorably to it,
because they also are in a group. These are common characteristics of
group dynamics. While the men may be faulted for making cat-calls,
the women must also be faulted for encouraging a behavior that they
feel is threatening at a personal level. The woman will not always be
in a group, but the cat-callers will (by definition). If women do
not like certain behavior on a personal level, they should not
encourage it on a group level (and this goes for "safe" and "unsafe"
situations as well -- a male who's actions are constantly reinforced
in "safe" settings will no doubt behave similarly in "unsafe"
situations, as his definition of "safe" cannot be expected to be
the same as everyone else's.)
|
271.57 | | ANT::JLUDGATE | it's only life.... | Mon Oct 03 1988 17:57 | 9 |
| re: .56
Hear Hear! enough of this double standard! tell men you don't
like it when you are in a group, and they are less likely to think
about harassing you when you are alone.
well, not today, they will probably think you are a cold bitch,
but eventually they will learn that maybe you aren't, maybe they
are the ones being rude.
|
271.58 | | NRPUR::HOTLINE | | Tue Oct 04 1988 17:19 | 14 |
| I'm replying to the question of how do you know if they are nice
or not.
You don't the last job I worked at before starting at DEC as a tag
was next door to another building who hired prisoners on a work
release program, anyway they started out with just catcalls which
were easy enough to ignore but steadily got worse into obscenity.
I didn't know they were from a jail until about a month after this
had been going on (in the morning and at lunch they all sat outside
facing our parking lot waiting for any girl to come in or go out.)
it was scary because I kept thinking they probably hadn't been with
a woman for a long time, and would I be mauled when I went out fro
lunch? Anyway I'm glad I don't work there anymore, and I don't
care for catcalls even if they are supposed to be compliments.
|
271.59 | Hurricane Cindy, blowing through..look out! | FROST::WHEEL | Familiar stranger | Mon Oct 10 1988 08:05 | 24 |
| I don't have the time to read all replies, so will jump in here.
I absolutely hate catcalls. I used to walk to work every day and
got harassed for the whole hour I walked. I had to wlak around
one building, and every morning a whole shop full of men would hang
out the window and yell until I was around the corner. Where was
their boss every day? Why should a woman be subjected this simply
for presenting herself outside? Why,when I;m trying to enjoy something
for myself should I be made so uncomfortable?
So, I tried to hang in there, not let them get to me, tune them
out with my Walkman. So one came up from behind me and "jumped"
me one morning on a less populated stretch of the road. I wasn't
badly hurt, and still tried to continue walking after a few days,
but I was too afraid and all the enjoyment was gone for me, so I
gave it up. BEsides, I still had to listen to all the a**holes
getting their jollies yelling out things to someone who would
never in a lifetime be impressed by such ignorant behaviour.
Ok, I';m chilling back out now. Guess this is a pet peeve with
me :-). I;ll return to my rose sniffing....
cj *->
|
271.60 | | GENRAL::DANIEL | still here | Tue Oct 11 1988 19:21 | 11 |
| re; not encouraging them;
There is no consistent definition of what means "encouragement" to a man.
There are some generally accepted gestures of encouragement for most of us,
but...to each thing the majority agrees to, there is a minority begging to
differ. Some men will be encouraged (also if they are with a group of men) by
a woman giving them dirty looks and telling them to shut up. Others will be
encouraged if she ignores them. Others will be encouraged if she looks.
Others will be encouraged if she smiles. The problem is, the woman walking by
probably doesn't know exactly what moves will be encouraging to the man/men and
which moves will make him/them quiet down or leave her alone.
|
271.62 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Ad Astra | Thu Oct 13 1988 12:25 | 7 |
| Re: .61
What other exceptions would you be willing to make, Marge? I'm
not disagreeing with your major point, but am curious as to where
you draw the line for "she's asking for it."
Steve
|
271.64 | Unjustified attack on reply .60? | TUNER::FLIS | missed me | Fri Oct 14 1988 13:45 | 10 |
| re: .61
And who the h*ll every said that any woman is required to interpret
anything?? reply .60 certainly didn't! .60 was simply making an
observation and offering to this note. At no time was any comment
made to the effect that women should know this and use it and/or
anything else.
Or did I miss something...?
jim
|
271.65 | | SALEM::AMARTIN | WE like da cars, Da cars dat go BOOM! | Fri Oct 14 1988 15:16 | 2 |
| ,64
You missed nothing... there was nothing there TO miss...
|
271.67 | She Was The Last Time She Checked | FDCV13::ROSS | | Fri Oct 14 1988 17:47 | 9 |
| RE: .66
Uhhh, Marge. I don't know quite how to tell you this.
But the "he" you refer to as having written .60 is a "she".
So much for that theory.........
Alan
|
271.69 | | RANCHO::HOLT | Robert Holt, UltrixAppsGp@UCO | Sun Oct 16 1988 22:55 | 6 |
|
re -.1
What a broad spectrum whine.
Gun gripes to soapbox, ok?
|
271.70 | Feeble_Liberal_Crybaby_Responses_Here_2 ? | 16223::THOMPSON | tryin' real hard to adjust... | Mon Oct 17 1988 10:53 | 12 |
| You may be able to gain better access to Soapbox than we do
where it is within easy driving distance ... However since the
whining wimp "liberal" element goes around thinking they have their
precious 1st amendment rights when it suits them to try to mouth off
AGAINST our 2nd amendment rights to own guns ... Remember you are
simply showing yourself to be unfair to expect us to tolerate
your "liberal" ranting and raving throughout the E-Net ... So
the next thing to consider is this ... Since .69 has absolutely
no bearing on the topic at hand while .68 is marginal at best,
we suggest the moderators muzzle Mr.Holt's worthless replies !!!!
~--e--~ Eagles_Have_Expressed_a_Debatable_Opinion_Unlike_Halting_Holt's
|
271.72 | Is This Like "The Emperor's New Clothes" Theory? | FDCV13::ROSS | | Mon Oct 17 1988 11:35 | 8 |
| Re: .71
Marge, are you saying, then, that a woman is most times unaware of
the effect she or her manner of dress will have on men?
Did Lady Godiva not desire to be noticed?
Alan
|
271.80 | If women say it's a problem, it is. | DSSDEV::FISHER | Work that dream and love your life. | Mon Oct 17 1988 17:16 | 30 |
|
I was talking to my sister on the phone the other day. She was upset
because her love life was not going well. She talked of the desire to
be "buddies" with a guy, to date him and get to know him, before sex
and sexuality come barging in.
At one point, she said, "Gerry, I guess...I'm pretty. But I can't
stand it a lot of the time. I mean, I walk down the street on the way
to work and I get these jerks saying stuff to me and coming on to me.
I _hate_ it. I mean, I put then in their place, I can handle that.
It's just that they make me feel like a bimbo, and I'm not. But how
can I do anything about it."
I wish you all could have heard all the saddness in her voice and all
the negative stuff she was saying about being "pretty." For those of
you who will say that my sister should not let jerks get to you, I
agree with you. I feel that my sister owns 50% of the responsibility
here. But I think that guys own the other 50% of the responsibility
for making a pretty woman very miserable. Even the strongest person
would not be able to shut out negative stuff when that person is
exposed to it many times every day.
I'm not saying that we should legislate against it. But I am saying
that I hope that guys are at least willing to listen to women who say
that catcalling is a _problem_. I know that it is a problem for my
sister. It has reduced her to tears and to devaluing her good looks.
--Gerry
|
271.81 | | RANCHO::HOLT | Robert Holt, UltrixAppsGp@UCO | Mon Oct 17 1988 17:33 | 10 |
|
Yo, eagle...
You oughtn't be so nasty to me .... I might mistake
it for disguised approval -;
I laugh when you mention worthless replies...tell me there
are no glass houses out there..
You oughta loosen up a bit. Everyone is *not* your enemy.
|
271.84 | | RANCHO::HOLT | Robert Holt, UltrixAppsGp@UCO | Mon Oct 17 1988 21:02 | 11 |
|
Eag,
Take a clue.
You need a vacation. I know the perfect spot to unwind...
How about a jog up Pike's Peak....? 13 miles and 8000 ft up.
It will take some of the starch out.
You'll feel lots better if you didn't get so exorcised....
|
271.88 | Observation | HANDY::MALLETT | Foole | Tue Oct 18 1988 18:04 | 11 |
| It does seem, eagles, that lately all roads for you lead to
firearms, freedom of speech, and/or "bleeding heart" liberals
(esp. Gov. Dukakis). I have no qualms discussing these or other
issues with you and others, but I guess I'm a little surprised
at the apparent anger and narrowness of focus I think I'm seeing
these days - "surprised" because it seems out of character with
the eagles I've seen in times past. He was, to me, a person of
considerably more moderate and measured voice. . .
Steve
|