T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
31.1 | Ties.....UGH! | EUCLID::LEVASSEUR | Ayatollah of Rock n Rollah | Mon Nov 24 1986 14:25 | 10 |
| Besides yourself? Well, I for one hate ties, they always manage
to get dipped in the speghetti sauce ot salad dressing while walking
through the food line in the cafeteria, they're uncomfortable as
hell and serve nothing more than a minor statement of supposed
respectability and professionalism. But me! I'm currently in a
financial position where ties are de rigeur. Whenever I've gone
without one, usually someone asks, "where's your tie" They musta
been invented by the marquis de Sade....ugh!
Ray
|
31.2 | What's not to like? | BETHEL::THOMPSON | Noter of the LoST ARK | Mon Nov 24 1986 14:33 | 5 |
| I like ties. The are much more comfortable then chains for example.
They are just another decorative thing to wear. I really don't
understand what the big deal is.
Alfred
|
31.3 | | STAR::TOPAZ | | Mon Nov 24 1986 14:38 | 9 |
| re .2:
> [Ties] are much more comfortable then chains
Well, what a wonderful reason to wear a tie. Perhaps the author of .2
walks around carrying a chair on his back all day, since that is so
much more comfortable than walking around carrying a sofa.
--Mr Topaz
|
31.5 | | RDGENG::LESLIE | Andy `{o}^{o}' Leslie, ECSSE, OSI. | Mon Nov 24 1986 15:33 | 12 |
| Ties have their uses.
The occasions upon which I wear a tie are:
o Weddings
o Funerals
o Interviews
o When representing DEC formally, as at DECUS, f'rinstance.
In the office? Not a chance.
Andy
|
31.6 | Re .3, funny | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | | Mon Nov 24 1986 15:45 | 11 |
|
Re .2, the "big deal" about ties is that some men don't like to
wear them, so why should society dictate that they do?
If *I* were a man, I would not wear ties. Neither my ex-husband
or my ex-SO, liked wearing ties, so I've had a lifetime of hearing
men bitch about ties, and I agree. Jeans and a t-shirt look much
sexier (to me).
Lorna
|
31.8 | | BETHEL::THOMPSON | Noter of the LoST ARK | Mon Nov 24 1986 16:37 | 15 |
| I guess what I should have said in .2 is why don't men like ties?
I really don't understand most of the complaints I've heard. They
are *not* uncomfortable in the slightest. A lot of things that men
don't complain about and do wear are. 'Cowboy boots' with high
heels, chains, and sandals just to name three.
A do I hear personal preference being called out? I agree. So why
does society (defined in a limited sense as the set of software
engineers) demand (and it clearly demands as much as 'outside
society' does) that men *not* wear ties.
As a non-conformist I proudly wear my ties. All you sheep feel free
to leave yours home. :-)
Alfred
|
31.9 | | BCSE::RYAN | Mannish Boy | Mon Nov 24 1986 17:13 | 13 |
| Haven't worn one in years (well, at least one:-). A year ago a
fire destroyed, among other things, the tie I owned. Haven't
missed it in the slightest...
Yes, they are uncomfortable, they always make me feel like I
can't breathe.. And I don't wear cowboy boots, anything with
high heels, chains, or sandals. Or earrings:-).
Unfortunately, my streak will end no later than July when my
brother gets married (I tried to convince them to live
together, but to no avail:-).
Mike
|
31.10 | SO THEY SAY... | TRCO01::HOBBS | | Mon Nov 24 1986 17:27 | 8 |
| This is'nt the exact quote of something I read in Esquire, but
it does say one reason why there are "professional" uniforms
like ties (and polished shoes, and pressed navy suits etc.)
The reason it is a requirment that professional people follow a
dress code for doing business, is that it stops you from making
an ass out of yourself BEFORE you open your mouth.
|
31.11 | how could we "tie one on?" | CEODEV::FAULKNER | my sherona | Mon Nov 24 1986 18:22 | 2 |
| hey if it weren't for ties
|
31.12 | Tie Game | MSDSWS::RESENDE | Common sense ... isn't! | Mon Nov 24 1986 21:50 | 9 |
| Well, I'd rather wear an ascot than a tie if we HAVE to wear anything,
but I don't know how to tie one of them. Same for a bow tie. But
some of us just have to wear ties 'cause of the job.
Why? Well, I guess so we'll look like our friendly competitors
from IBM. :-)
Fit_to_be_tied,
Steve
|
31.13 | A necessity in Oz | SNO78C::CLARKE | Overcome evil with good. | Mon Nov 24 1986 23:47 | 5 |
| Unfortunately, here in Australia ties are a must in the computer
world (except in the really hot areas like tropical far north
Queensland). I feel fortunate that I can get out of wearing a suit!
Mat.
|
31.14 | Personally I like Gold... | PRANCR::MARTIN | Over forty victim of fate | Tue Nov 25 1986 07:38 | 13 |
|
My Oxford button downs are 17 1/2 in. necks. My neck is
an 18 in. neck [gag]. I really don't want to spend the
money to have them tailor made for my neck, so I don't
wear them very often. However, now that I think about it,
maybe that's just an excuse....
C.
|
31.15 | Make a fashion statement | CEDSWS::REDDEN | De Oppresso Liber | Tue Nov 25 1986 08:31 | 6 |
| Men's business dress is fairly restrictive and very boring. Ties,
along with suspenders and socks, represent the few areas in which
a man can express whatever fashion statement seems appropriate without
violating (too much) the expectations of customers and collegues.
I don't understand why we chose to dislike it rather than enjoy
it.
|
31.16 | | ECCGY1::JAERVINEN | The more you pay, the more it's worth | Tue Nov 25 1986 08:40 | 14 |
| <<< HUMAN::ARKD$:[NOTES_ARCHIVE]SOAPBOXI.NOTE;1 >>>
-< The DECbox >-
================================================================================
Note 34.6 Neckties 6 of 35
METEOR::BECK 7 lines 2-MAR-1984 14:44
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chuck Monia used to explain about neckties as follows:
It's a well known fact that neckties cut off the flow of
blood to the brain.
At DEC, when they make you a manager, they put a necktie on
you. The tighter they pull, the higher you go.
|
31.17 | |^) | GENRAL::SURVIL | Too hip to be square | Tue Nov 25 1986 10:58 | 6 |
|
RE:.14
Carry, what do you 18" neck, you HAVE no neck!
Todd
|
31.18 | For those with a PostScript printer... | BCSE::RYAN | Mannish Boy | Tue Nov 25 1986 14:15 | 26 |
| %!
% A useful Q&D sign for some environments. rcd 14-May-86
/r 180 def % radius of circle
/hw 252 def % half-width of square containing it
/No { % finish a little sign
% Translate to the center of where the sign should be (it's 1.75" square).
% Then draw your whatever within a circle of radius 40 and finish with No.
gsave
30 setlinewidth 0.8 setgray % should really set color to red...
0 0 45 0 360 arc stroke
r 2 sqrt div dup dup neg exch moveto dup neg lineto stroke
0 setlinewidth 0 setgray
hw neg dup moveto hw dup neg lineto hw dup lineto hw neg hw
lineto closepath stroke
grestore
} def
/Tie { % to illustrate "No"
12 80 moveto 32 120 lineto -32 120 lineto -12 80 lineto
closepath fill % knot
12 72 moveto -12 72 lineto -40 -100 lineto 0 -140 lineto 40 -100 lineto
closepath fill % tie
} def
/inch {72 mul} def
4 inch 6 inch translate
Tie No % (the postfix way to say it!)
showpage
|
31.19 | Tie me a river.... | RSTS32::TABER | If you can't bite, don't bark! | Tue Nov 25 1986 14:50 | 13 |
| Well, I *LIKE* ties. I wear ties alot... and suits, too.
And I adore a man in a tie. It's easier to grab ahold and lead
him where I want him! :*)
Seriously, I've never seen a man in a tie (and a grey pinstripe suit)
that I haven't done a doubletake and thought "Now there's a man who
knows he looks good!".
I'm all for jeans and sneakers and T-shirts, but just like men like
Spandex, I love ties!
Bugsy
|
31.21 | Ties are now informal too... | USMRW6::RNICOLAZZO | Better living through chemistry | Tue Nov 25 1986 16:35 | 7 |
| Well i don't mind ties at all. I always thought i could never wear
one but now i don't even notice when i am. I pretty much have to
wear one in work, but outside of work i wear ties often (very different
ties then i would wear to work). And mind you, i *don't* hang out
in the "brass and glass" after work Yuppie type spots. I go much
more for sticky carpets.
|
31.22 | it's fun! | TAHOE::HAYNES | Charles Haynes | Tue Nov 25 1986 23:43 | 12 |
| I've been known to wear ties. I have two "dress up" costumes. On
is a hand tailored dark blue raw silk suit from Hong Kong. The other
is black formal evening wear. I have regular ties for the suit,
and three bow ties for the evening wear, white, red, and of course
black.
Getting all dressed up and going out, to a fancy restaurant or whatever,
is a BLAST!
Getting dressed up for work? Nahh, not unless it's Haloween.
-- Charles
|
31.23 | a bug in the ps file from 31.18 | TAHOE::HAYNES | Charles Haynes | Wed Nov 26 1986 00:18 | 18 |
| Re: 31.18
On my printer it works better if in the "No" procedure, the 45 is
replaced by r on the arc call. A context diff follows:
30 setlinewidth 0.8 setgray % should really set color to red...
0 0 45 0 360 arc stroke
r 2 sqrt div dup dup neg exch moveto dup neg lineto stroke
should be
30 setlinewidth 0.8 setgray % should really set color to red...
0 0 r 0 360 arc stroke
r 2 sqrt div dup dup neg exch moveto dup neg lineto stroke
I posted it on our lab door...
-- Charles
|
31.24 | I *like* ties | PEANO::GLASER | Steve Glaser DTN 226-7646 LKG1-2/A19 | Wed Nov 26 1986 00:19 | 17 |
|
I also really like ties. Especially linen or silk ones. I've got a
dozen or so (and I'm in engineering so there's no requirement to wear
them to work). I'm also into suspenders.
I think a lot of it is the mindset. When I've got a tie on, I feel
more business like. Depending on what I've got to do, that can be
helpful.
When I was at Prime, I took pride in being the only guy on my floor
that didn't wear a tie. The floor was all marketing and finance types
- I was the token engineer, kinda fun but it got old.
Around here, if you wear a tie into work you get ribbed to death
(bucking for management eh?). That was also true at Tektronix.
Steveg
|
31.25 | | RDGENG::LESLIE | Andy `{o}^{o}' Leslie, ECSSE, OSI. | Wed Nov 26 1986 03:39 | 3 |
| re: whatever
what is/are Spandex?
|
31.26 | Mistified... | COMET2::MARTIN | Over forty victim of fate | Wed Nov 26 1986 05:03 | 13 |
|
RE: .17
Toad, Huh!!! Then why do all them 'boxers think I have
a red one???
C.
|
31.27 | Eh? | RDGE00::SADAT | Mornington Crescent! | Wed Nov 26 1986 08:17 | 10 |
| Re: .24
> I'm also into suspenders.
Hmm. Not too sure about this. Presumably US-suspenders are not the same as EEC-
Euro-suspenders. If they are I wouldn't go bragging about!!
Oh yes, ties. Well, I have to wear one. But only to remind me that I'm at work.
Tarik.
|
31.28 | | RDGENG::LESLIE | Andy `{o}^{o}' Leslie, ECSSE, OSI. | Wed Nov 26 1986 08:29 | 1 |
| US Suspenders == UK Braces
|
31.29 | Spandex defined | RSTS32::TABER | If you can't bite, don't bark! | Wed Nov 26 1986 10:20 | 25 |
| Andy, Spandex is a knit material that is EXTREMELY shiny, looks like
satin when you have it on, and is highly elastic so it clings to
every curve that it touches, and it fits VERY tightly.
If you saw the movie GREASE, Olivia Newton-John was wearing Spandex
pants in the last few scenes of the movie. I think the song was
YOU'RE THE ONE THAT I WANT... not sure.
Anyway, they were usually attributed to the genre of "loose women"
(uhm, probably called tarts over there, called floozies, bimbos,
etc., here) *BUT* exciting clothing has found a new level of respectability
and while some folks still turn their noses up over it, alot of women
realize that dressing kinky is fun and their SO's really enjoy it
as well. Note: I did NOT just say that women who wear Spandex are
tarts, floozies, or bimbos!!! I said they USED to be called that... now
it's okay for anyone!
I used it as a comparison because when my husband dresses up for me,
he puts on his grey pinstripe suit and tie, not Spandex, but it's for
the same reason -- to please me.
Does England have Frederick's of Hollywood? That's a neverending source
of Spandex and kinky clothes over here.
Bugsy
|
31.30 | DOES England have Fredricks???? ;-) | VORTEX::JOVAN | that's how it's gotta be... | Wed Nov 26 1986 10:50 | 1 |
|
|
31.31 | | RDGENG::LESLIE | Andy `{o}^{o}' Leslie, ECSSE, OSI. | Wed Nov 26 1986 13:22 | 5 |
| Who? :-)
Nope. Never 'eard of 'em.
Sorry guvnor.
|
31.32 | spandex for men | TAHOE::HAYNES | Charles Haynes | Wed Nov 26 1986 13:55 | 4 |
| By the way, I wore spandex tights on halloween as part of my costume.
Most of the women at work loved it.
-- Charles
|
31.33 | | RDGE43::KEW | I-Tal, VITAL | Thu Nov 27 1986 06:39 | 9 |
| > -< DOES England have Fredricks???? ;-) >-
Uh, no...??
but quite a few similar stores, ;-)
Ann Summers springs to mind as one
|
31.34 | shopping spree | CARLIN::LEMAIRE | Sarah Hosmer Lemaire | Tue Dec 02 1986 12:19 | 5 |
| Where's a good place to buy interesting suspenders?
Within 20 miles of Maynard if possible.
SHL
|
31.35 | | RDGENG::LESLIE | Andy `{o}^{o}' Leslie, ECSSE. OSI. | Tue Dec 02 1986 13:53 | 3 |
| send some mail to Jerry Kew. His family firm makes them.
I can bring out your selections in January...
|
31.36 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Reality is frequently inaccurate | Tue Dec 02 1986 14:52 | 3 |
| There's a place at Quincy Market in Boston that sells all sorts
of unusual suspenders. I think it was one of the stall vendors.
Steve
|
31.37 | | DINER::SHUBIN | Go ahead - make my lunch! | Tue Dec 02 1986 15:39 | 19 |
| re: .15
Men's business dress is fairly restrictive and very boring. Ties,
along with suspenders and socks, represent the few areas in which
a man can express whatever fashion statement seems appropriate without
violating (too much) the expectations of customers and collegues.
I don't understand why we chose to dislike it rather than enjoy
it.
I dislike it because it's one of those "supposed to" things. I don't like
to do things just because they've always been done that way, especially (as
with ties) when there's no function involved.
Not wearing a tie makes at least as much of a statement as wearing one does.
It certainly stands out more.
Another interesting question is: Why is men's dress to restrictive and
boring? What can we do to change it?
-- hal
|
31.38 | tie = noose :-) | KALKIN::BUTENHOF | Approachable Systems | Wed Dec 03 1986 09:38 | 28 |
| I'd argue that ties are much *less* comfortable than "chains for
example" (31.2). The reason is not the article itself (one could
reasonably argue that a cloth tie should be more comfortable
than a metal chain), but that to "properly" wear a tie (in any
manner which is acceptable to those who wish ties to be worn),
one must fasten the top button of one's shirt. Chains may be
worn loosely on a bare neck, which, to me, is far more
comfortable. I don't wear turtlenecks, either, by the way, for
very similar reasons.
Though I prefer close fitting clothes elsewhere, clothes
which closely enclose my neck make me continually feel that
I am choking, which is not at all pleasant. Call it a minor
form of claustrophobia, which perhaps it is.
I suppose an additional reason is as a cultural protest.
It really bothers me that people consider a strip of cloth
to be so important, and I refuse to cater to their insecurities.
The last time I recall wearing a tie was for my interview trip
to Digital. One of the many reasons I chose to work for Digital
was that nobody I talked to wore a tie, and having it on made me
feel completely foolish while walking around in the virtually
tie-less corridors of the Mill. Incidentally, I have gained
enough confidence in myself that I would never again wear
a tie for an interview.
/dave
|
31.39 | | VCQUAL::THOMPSON | Noter of the LoST ARK | Wed Dec 03 1986 11:30 | 9 |
| I also avoid turtle neck shirts because I do not like tight
fitting clothes around my neck. I do not have any trouble finding
button shirts that are confortable at the neck though. I don't tie
my ties to make them tighter then the shirt.
I hate the feel of chains on my bare neck and they look dorky (is
that a word?) worn over a shirt.
Alfred
|
31.40 | Was that me:-)? | BCSE::RYAN | Mannish Boy | Wed Dec 03 1986 17:51 | 5 |
| Just sign my name to .38. Just one change, I do wear
turtlenecks, but the first couple of times I wear a new one I
end up yanking at the neck until it's comfortably loose.
Mike
|
31.41 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Reality is frequently inaccurate | Wed Dec 03 1986 18:59 | 9 |
| I got used to wearing ties while I was at a private high school,
where it was required. Nowadays, I don't wear ties for normal
activities, but I like to dress up in a suit and tie when the occasion
requires it (customer presentations, going out to fancy dinner,
etc.) It's sort of the "power suit" effect. I don't find ties
uncomfortable or restricting - it's the too-tight collars on shirts
that are too small that bother me.
Steve
|
31.43 | Tie haters untie, er, uh, unite! | DINER::SHUBIN | Go ahead - make my lunch! | Thu Dec 04 1986 18:44 | 20 |
| re: .38 (dave)
> The last time I recall wearing a tie was for my interview trip
> to Digital. One of the many reasons I chose to work for Digital
> was that nobody I talked to wore a tie, and having it on made me
> feel completely foolish ...
I didn't wear a tie at my DEC interview (5� years ago), because I wanted
them to see what they'd be getting. The first person I talked to had hair
down the middle of his back, and no one (but the manager) had a tie, so I
figured this would be a good place.
I had jury duty today, and the little booklet they sent out in advance asked
that men wear suits or jackets and ties. I wasn't the only one that ignored
the advise.
The only places that I feel a little out of place is at occasions like
weddings, but I'm getting used to it. After all, if many people don't like
it, but no one does anything different, nothing will change.
-- hs
|
31.44 | | RDGENG::LESLIE | | Fri Dec 05 1986 17:52 | 3 |
| I wore one today when representing DEC at an exhibition.
It was torn off as soon as possible.
|
31.46 | [it's so hard to keep coming up with clever titles] | DINER::SHUBIN | Go ahead - make my lunch! | Mon Dec 08 1986 17:30 | 6 |
| re: .44
� I wore one today when representing DEC at an exhibition.
� It was torn off as soon as possible.
Here's what I don't understand -- if it's so uncomfortable, why wear it?
What's gained? When will it all end.....................
|
31.47 | Use a tie to SAY something about yourself | SQUIRM::FORD | Bouncing Off the Satellites | Mon Dec 08 1986 23:10 | 26 |
| > -< Make a fashion statement >-
>
> Men's business dress is fairly restrictive and very boring. Ties,
> along with suspenders and socks, represent the few areas in which
> a man can express whatever fashion statement seems appropriate without
> violating (too much) the expectations of customers and collegues.
> I don't understand why we chose to dislike it rather than enjoy
> it.
Bingo!! Someone hit the nail on the head. Make a fashion statement!
Even your everyday businessman can stand out like a sore thumb if he's
wearing a bright yellow tie.
I like to wear ties. I like to wear ties because in the software
engineering environment, I stand out. I'm different. I have a couple
of leather ties, a few very bright ties, and one with piano keys
running down its length. (I'm also looking for a sleek white bow
tie for a neat black tuxedo shirt I have. Can anyone help?)
I don't feel choked or uncomfortable in ties, and I don't mind the
attention ("interview today?"). I also have outrageous tietacks to go
with those ties. One tietack is actually a button from a WPS keyboard
that says "Bold" -- as in "bold fashion statement."
Dare to be different. Stand out! Why be normal? Live a little!
We only go around once.... make the best of it!
|
31.49 | Wrap Cloth Around My Neck? Ackptthhppphhtt! | VAXUUM::DYER | It's Bedtime for Bonzo | Thu Dec 11 1986 04:18 | 15 |
| Dave Butenhof said it all: TIE = NOOSE.
I had a job at an accounting firm where I was forced to wear a tie. There
I was, a temporary Kelly Girl employee, doing data entry in an obscure
corner somewhere, and the president of the company flips out because I'm
not wearing a tie!
So I wore the same damned tie every day, a red/black striped thing (the
only tie I had - I've since fed it to pirhanas) that clashed with every
shirt I wore. All to keep some corporate fatcat from having a coronary.
Ties have one use. You can soak them in gasoline and use them as wicks for
Molotov cocktails, which are thrown at any business establishment that sells
ties. 'Nuff said.
<_Jym_>
|
31.50 | hmmmm | KALKIN::BUTENHOF | Approachable Systems | Thu Dec 11 1986 10:38 | 8 |
| >Ties have one use. You can soak them in gasoline and use them as wicks for
> Molotov cocktails, which are thrown at any business establishment that sells
> ties. 'Nuff said.
Sorry, Jym, I apologize. Never again will I say that ties
have no use! :-) :-)
/dave
|
31.51 | | RDGE40::KERRELL | test drive in progress | Thu Dec 11 1986 12:25 | 5 |
| You can also use them for tying your SO to the bed :^)
Read this quick Andy will probably censor it!
Dave.
|
31.52 | I thought it was an oil company... | RDGE00::SADAT | I'm a crumb, & I'm in your lemonade. | Thu Dec 11 1986 12:30 | 3 |
| Dave, what exactly *is* an SO?
Tarik.
|
31.54 | sheesh | KALKIN::BUTENHOF | Approachable Systems | Thu Dec 11 1986 12:40 | 11 |
| Sex Object? C'mon, now, Steven.
Most of the time, anyway, when people say SO, they mean
"Significant Other"... spouse, lifemate, fianc�[e], steady,
etc. The basic idea is to remove sexual and lifestyle bias,
providing a theoretically generic term. Unfortunately, it's
often so generic is doesn't mean much (e.g., an SO is generally
but not always somewhat semi-permanent, but you can't count
on it).
/dave
|
31.55 | or... | TWEED::B_REINKE | Down with bench Biology | Thu Dec 11 1986 12:42 | 3 |
| SO = Significant other, in otherwords boyfriend/girlfriend/child
or lover, fiance,fiancee, roommate etc. etc.
There has been a longish discussion on this in Womannotes q.v.
|
31.56 | WHERE'S SO'S HUMANITY? | EDEN::KLAES | Looking for nuclear wessels. | Thu Dec 11 1986 17:06 | 5 |
| I do not like SO - the "other" is far too impersonal; it makes
the person sound more like an inanimate object.
Larry
|
31.57 | What ever happened to POSSLQ? | DECWET::MITCHELL | | Thu Dec 11 1986 20:09 | 1 |
|
|
31.58 | tie=rank and/or branch of service indicator | RANCHO::RAH | sit on a potato pan, otis | Thu Dec 11 1986 20:56 | 9 |
| In DEC ties most often serve as badges of rank or job description.
In meetings that include tech and non-tech persons the men in ties
usually affiliate with the sales/marketing function and tells
customers to whom they may address non tech issues. By the same
token lack of ties indicate engineers, and a presenter w/o tie
is usually assumed to be discussing tech details to a similarly
non tie wearing audience. Somehow women seem to lack similar
apparel to denote their rank and affiliation. Maybe its tailored
clothing or expensive blouses...?
|
31.59 | I like ties! | QUARK::LIONEL | Reality is frequently inaccurate | Thu Dec 11 1986 21:27 | 6 |
| What do you guys have against ties? I like them - it's part of
"dressing up", which a lot of people enjoy. I admit I wouldn't
want to wear one every day, because that would take the fun out
of wearing one on special occasions. I don't consider a tie a noose
any more than I consider a wristwatch to be a handcuff.
Steve
|
31.60 | jewelry of torture | CACHE::MARSHALL | hunting the snark | Fri Dec 12 1986 00:33 | 12 |
| re .59:
> I don't consider a tie a noose any more than I consider a wristwatch
> to be a handcuff.
But a wristwatch IS a handcuff.
/
( ___
) ///
/
|
31.61 | {RE .57} | VAXUUM::DYER | It's Bedtime for Bonzo | Fri Dec 12 1986 06:36 | 2 |
| {RE .57} - POSSLQ assumes heterosexuality.
<_Jym_>
|
31.62 | Absolute poppycock! | ROYCE::RKE | dragons slain....maids rescued | Fri Dec 12 1986 07:15 | 12 |
| > In DEC ties most often serve as badges of rank or job description.
> In meetings that include tech and non-tech persons the men in ties
> usually affiliate with the sales/marketing function and tells
> customers to whom they may address non tech issues. By the same
> token lack of ties indicate engineers, and a presenter w/o tie
What is this garbage.....are we to assume that Engineers are
"outranked" by sales/marketing???
Richard.
|
31.63 | Poppycock*2! | JAWS::COTE | Go ahead, take your cheapest shot... | Fri Dec 12 1986 08:44 | 10 |
| Re .58
Absolute bull!
When I was a Field Service engineer the policy was that all male
enigineers *must* wear a tie.
I now work for marketing. I wear a tie when *I* want to!
Edd quite_comfy_today_in_grey_pinstripes_and_marroon_tie
|
31.64 | OK then: so what's POSSLQ when it's at home? | RDGE00::SADAT | I'm a crumb, & I'm in your lemonade. | Fri Dec 12 1986 09:15 | 0 |
31.65 | Come live with me and be my Posslq | YAZOO::B_REINKE | Down with bench Biology | Fri Dec 12 1986 09:40 | 2 |
| POSSLQ - persons of opposite sex sharing living quarters.
From the census forms
|
31.66 | | CSSE32::PHILPOTT | CSSE/Lang. & Tools, ZK02-1/N71 | Fri Dec 12 1986 10:04 | 14 |
|
> In DEC ties most often serve as badges of rank or job description.
> In meetings that include tech and non-tech persons the men in ties
> usually affiliate with the sales/marketing function and tells
> customers to whom they may address non tech issues. By the same
> token lack of ties indicate engineers, and a presenter w/o tie
Reminds me of the first time I attended DECUS (as a customer), at
the intro briefing we were told "people with blue ribbons on their
badges are from DEC. They are experts... unless they are wearing a
tie in which case they are marketeers or managers."
/. Ian .\
|
31.67 | | RDGE00::SADAT | I'm a crumb, & I'm in your lemonade. | Fri Dec 12 1986 12:38 | 4 |
| > POSSLQ - persons of opposite sex sharing living quarters.
Come on!! You're having me on!! Is this really what it means? Also, does
'sharing' mean as we say 'in the Biblical sense'?
|
31.68 | I'M SURPRISED WE STILL AREN'T WEARING ARMOR! | EDEN::KLAES | Looking for nuclear wessels. | Fri Dec 12 1986 12:39 | 9 |
| Ties were originally scarves worn by noblemen in the Middle
Ages.
In my opinion, ties look okay for certain occasions, but this
is the 20th Century - let's get our clothes in step with the Modern
Era.
Larry
|
31.69 | posslq is real | YAZOO::B_REINKE | Down with bench Biology | Fri Dec 12 1986 14:39 | 7 |
| re .67
No I am *not* putting you on. There really is/was a place
on the census forms for Persons of opposite sex sharing living
quarters (as distinguished from spouse I believe.)
Bonnie
|
31.71 | Please! | AKOV04::WILLIAMS | | Mon Dec 22 1986 15:36 | 37 |
| Lacking the patience to read through all the responses to this note,
I may be repeating the opinions of others (I certainly hope so).
I have worn a beard since I was 16 years old, with a few years off
for various reasons which will be noted in due course. My original
intention was probably to be different (we're talking 1956 Boston,
Massachusetts) but, in time, I grew to like a beard. In 1958 I
enlisted in the Marine Corps and lost my beard for four years.
Upon regaining freedom I regrew my beard. Then I joined the US
Peace Corps. This was early Peace Corps and many of the instructors
were not Peace Corps types, simply working folk. Many of the
instructors, who had the final say on who went (in my case to India)
and who did not, believed beards to be a statement of rebellion
and showed prejudice against wearers of same. So, I shaved my face
prior to the end of training and, arriving in India regrew my beard.
Returning to the US I had difficulty finding employment (Peace Corps
types were very suspect at the time) so I shaved again and kept
my Peace Corps posting to myself. When I acquired employment I
regrew my beard. About ten years ago I 'lucked' into a great job
with a company with a policy against hiring people with beards.
They were nice enough to explain his to me when they told me the
job (a very good one) was mine for the taking. I laughed at once
again coming face to face with this distrust of bearded people and
shaved on the Sunday before starting the new job. On Monday (the
first day) I shaved for the second and last time.
The point to the history is simple. I don't believe I am a beard
or a suit or a haircut or a necktie or anything. I am me. If facial
hair or a piece of wearing apparel is between me and something I
want then the facial hair of wearing apparel can be altered. The
essence of me will not be altered, just a small part of the visual
me.
If the wedding of a family member meant something to .0 then he
would have worn a necktie. His refusal tells me he is as silly
and small as the person who demanded that he wear a necktie. Surely,
.0's persona equates to more than the absence of a necktie!
|
31.72 | Oh God, they're all staring at me. | GENRAL::FRASHER | Master of naught | Tue Feb 03 1987 15:19 | 52 |
| One reply said it best for me, it depends on the occasion. If the
occasion warrants a tie, then I'll wear one. I don't normally wear
a tie because I don't need one, I wear flannel shirts and I would
look silly with a tie. Well, some people do wear ties with flannel
shirts and blue jeans. In my job, I take a chance of getting dirty
and being burned with a soldering iron. I don't need a tie floppy
around looking for an opportunity to snuggle up to a soldering iron.
I am somewhat shy and don't like to attract attention. I dress
conservatively (there's that word again) because it is the best
way to avoid attention. I also dress comfortably. My office is
in a draft and flannel is warm. Flannel shirts come in many different
colors, so I have a better choice. Mainly, I blend in with my
co-workers. Also, I don't wear 'different' hair styles, earrings,
funny shoes (I wear tennis shoes in the summer and hiking boots
in the winter [high tops keep the snow out]), hats, or anything
that will attract attention. I'm sure that in other areas, you
can wear these things without attracting attention. Just out of
curiosity, can you wear cowboy boots in Boston without getting
stares? How about a punk outfit, spiked hair, etc. I can wear
cowboy boots without getting a second glance, however, to wear a
full blown cowboy outfit complete with hat, would attract attention
even in Colorado, but not as much as a full blown punk outfit.
The afore mentioned cowboy outfit would cause stares within DEC,
but on the street downtown, it wouldn't get a glance. People know
me without a tie and if I wore one, they would notice and I don't
want to be noticed. My style is more the 'mountain man' look, rather
than the 'cowboy' look. And my lifestyle is similar. We have city
people, country people and mountain people, and you can find them
all within DEC.
My perception of people in DEC, Colorado Springs, engineering is this:
wearing a tie = top management, vendor, FE, interviewee
no tie but wearing knit pants = engineer, manager
no tie, wearing blue jeans = technician or assembler
If I meet someone wearing knit pants, I assume he's an engineer.
When I go to meetings, I notice what kind of pants guys wear and
generally, techs wear blue jeans and engineers wear knit pants.
The majority don't have beards, and beards seem to be about equally
divided between engineers and techs.
As for women, the best dressed are secretaries, then come engineers,
and then techs and assemblers. There is really not a lot of difference
between secretaries and engineers, or between techs and assemblers.
Probably because engineers have techs to do their dirty work. (Oh,
no, that's sure to turn up the heat, where's my flame retardant
underwear ;-) ).
Spence
|
31.73 | | GENRAL::SURVIL | Mother Goose & Grimm | Tue Feb 03 1987 15:44 | 4 |
|
Man, you are aware of your suroundings Spence.
Todd
|
31.74 | Thanks, Todd. | GENRAL::FRASHER | Master of naught | Wed Feb 04 1987 00:40 | 10 |
| > Man, you are aware of your suroundings Spence.
Todd, you may have noticed I meant general observations, not conclusive
facts. And I should have specified 'electronic and mechanical
engineering'. I don't include component engineering or software
engineering. I am plenty aware of my surroundings when I have a
reason to be. Or should I have taken your typical one-liner as a
compliment?
Spence
|
31.75 | engineers with *knit pants*!!?? Yee-uk! :-) | KALKIN::BUTENHOF | Approachable Systems | Wed Feb 04 1987 07:54 | 9 |
| .72: Gee, I don't recall seeing many knit pants around here...
anyway, our typical image of an engineer (here in software
engineering land) is jeans and t-shirt (though the latter
are moderately scarce this time of year).
Cowboy boots may be worn without much attention... cowboy
hats stand out a bit more. I know... I used to wear both.
/dave
|
31.76 | | GENRAL::SURVIL | Mother Goose & Grimm | Wed Feb 04 1987 10:29 | 8 |
|
Spence,
No reason to take the comment at all. I have never put that
much effort into the people around me. Yes, you can take that
as a compliment.
Todd
|
31.77 | My thermostat's back on 'cool'. | GENRAL::FRASHER | Master of naught | Wed Feb 04 1987 12:37 | 18 |
| OK, Todd, my first instinct told me that it was a jab. I humbly
apologize for slapping back.
RE .75, should we assume that you are in Mass.?
I have a survey on blue jeans vs. other 'lower body apparel'. In
my original reply, I lumped all 'other' as 'knit', then realized
that what I meant by 'knit' was actually anything other than blue
jeans. I'm beginning to notice that my notes are vague because
I leave out details to try and prevent my notes from being extremely
long. I will try to start including details for clarity.
I will try to find another note to include my survey in and leave
this one for ties. I have succeded in changing the subject from
ties to pants. BTW, I only found one person who regularly wears
a tie, a mechanical engineer from England.
Spence
|
31.78 | Ties: I'll NEVER be a manager.... | SAVAGE::LOCKRIDGE | Artificial Insanity | Thu May 07 1987 14:39 | 23 |
| The subject's a little old, but I new to his conference, so I'll reply
anyway.
Ties: Basically I dislike them. When I am acting as an official
representative of Digital I'll wear one (and even a sport jacket with
it), but NEVER into work (except for vendor meeting, again, official...)
I've also been known to wear one when acting as a substitute organist,
going out for a special dinner or meeting, etc. It feels nice to
be all dressed up WITH some place to go once in awhile.
A short amusing story: When I was a resident Field Service engineer at
Bell Labs in Holmdel, NJ, our management decided we all needed to wear
ties to work. Mind you NONE of our customers wore ties and were very
used to us NOT wearing one. Well, all of us save one wore ties in
every day. One day the gent who refused to wear a tie very seriously
asked me if I was colorblind. I responded that I wasn't and asked why
he asked. He said because the ties I wore never went with anything
else. I replied, "I was told to wear a tie. They didn't say it had to
MATCH". I had a rather good collection of UGLY ties. Shortly there
after the tie requirement was dropped. I still have that peach
tie.....
-Bob
|
31.79 | Ties in bars... | LILAC::MKPROJ | REAGAN::ZORE | Wed May 20 1987 09:30 | 17 |
| One reason for not wearing a tie (at least in a bar) comes out
of a story from one of my relatives. Seems my uncle (who was a
career Marine) was in a bar with uniform on (which includes a tie)
when he became involved in an altercation with another party (I
don't have any details on the whys or wherefores of the altercation).
Anyway, in short order he found himself being twirled around and around
by this monster who was holding onto the end of his tie (They are
strong, the ties I mean). The most foolish he's ever felt according
to him. Anyway, the next day he threw out all the ties he had (which
were the types that you have to "tie" and bought a brand new lot
of them which were the clip-on variety. So let this be a lesson
to all you fighters out there who occasionally like to take on the
world, if you're wearing a tie when the occasion arises and it's
not a clip-on, it's a good idea to remove it before proceeding.
Rich
|
31.80 | Ties can come in handy when... | WARLRD::CFLETCHER | Short Stuff | Fri Jun 19 1987 10:50 | 27 |
| Hi!
I think ties look nice when a man has got to be dressed up, but
I'm more concerned with my SO's comfort, than that. He absolutely
hates ties! Ties aren't very comfortable in 90+ degree weather.
I wish he didn't have to wear one at work, but its the rule down
here at the Atlanta CSC.
I work in Office Automation - and the men are also supposed to wear
ties. Quite a few still won't, and many of those who do, wear the
ugliest ties you could imagine. (Mustard/Gray yellow diagonal stripes,
with Flouresent yellow diagonal stripes - Lovely!!!
Of course we also have our "Fish Tie Day". Where many, including
on of our managers, wear fish ties.
I really don't think it's fair to "make" men wear ties.
P.S. Ties do come in handy when keeping my SO in line - even tho'
he's alot bigger than me! (of course, everyone's bigger than me
- 5.0, 91.5lbs) JUST TEASING!!!!!! :-) :-) :-)
Bye!
Corinne
|
31.81 | Well, blast it, its *my* neck | SKYLRK::OLSON | green chile crusader! | Tue Jun 07 1988 22:13 | 26 |
| I've been moderately astonished since joining Digital to see the
vehement reactions to what I had previously considered as standard
business dress. Suits and ties, black oxfords. Here I'd gone and
spent years with a short haircut wearing Air Force blue uniforms,
I finally get to pick out my own respectable-looking clothes and
my coworkers just give me no end of comments. I *enjoy* the look.
I've been looking forward to it for years. Its *so much nicer*
than wearing blue double-knit polyester!!!
I work as a software specialist, I've just entered a one-year
residency in a customer site where very few people wear suits;
the other two DEC residents wear cords, open collar shirts,
sometimes a dress or skirt but nothing fancy. The customer is used
to it. So what recent grief did I take for wearing a suit to work?
Searching for a word to describe me, one of my two fellow residents
described me as a "marketing type". arrrggghhh. I let her know
it bothered me.
Pigeonholed for overdressing. Who'd ever believe it? I thought
my long hair would protect me ;=). I remain unrepentent; I still
wear my ties. I daresay that DEC's corporate culture needs
a bit more tolerance towards those of us who so choose. Thats
*you folks* who, as a previous topic mentioned, (~30.200) find that
"its easy to dump on suits".
DougO
|
31.82 | I will give up my tie when they prise it from... | LAMHRA::WHORLOW | I Came,I Saw,I concurred | Wed Jun 08 1988 02:53 | 15 |
| G'day,
re -.1 Good one, Doug O.
I started work in an insurance office in the City of London. Wearing
of a suit AND tie was compulsory.
I still (some 25 years later) choose to wear a suit and tie , though,
in the somewhat laid-back Australian lifestyle, I have come to terms
with removing my jacket at work. (but not my tie!! :-) )
How you look does give some impression of how you regard you work.
Derek
|
31.84 | | RANCHO::HOLT | Robert A. Holt | Wed Jun 08 1988 12:52 | 15 |
|
re .81
You can wear what you like. Just be aware that people will make
those kinds of judgements.
People expect software types to dress the part just as they expect
sales and marketinng types to dress their parts. You can buck the
trend; this is America, after all, but don't be suprised at having
to re-establish credibility often.
I wear suits occaisionaly. I'll even be buried in one.
BTW - when I got out of the Army in '73 I couldn't get rid of that
green suit fast enough!
|
31.85 | Keep on keepin' on | HANDY::MALLETT | Situation hopeless but not serious | Wed Jun 15 1988 16:45 | 16 |
| Hang in there, Doug. "Fashion", being what it is, suits will
no doubt become a "trend" sooner or later and then you will
have been "the vanguard". Remain unrepentent!
BTW, it seems to me that your story serves well to remind us of
our corporate roots and values: are we not the company who takes
so much pride in doing things a little differently than all the
others? Seems to me that when "Jeans (or whatever) are what I wear
to work" becomes "Jeans are what we wear here" (barely unstated
expectation) we've started to lose the beat.
Steve
P.S. Wanna have some real fun? Start coming into work in a
Manufacturing group wearing a coat & tie. . .
|
31.86 | Appeal! | HBO::PETERSEN | | Tue Aug 09 1988 11:59 | 8 |
|
Another woman's point of view:
I find men in ties, even without a suit, can give a
man such sex appeal! Add on a suit, and I'm yours!
Of course, other attire can be sexy, but a tie with
jeans is my favorite!
|
31.87 | | RANCHO::HOLT | Robert Holt, UCO-1 | Tue Aug 09 1988 13:23 | 6 |
|
> Add on a suit, and I'm yours!
I'm running home to change, right now.
Do you prefer black or grey?
|
31.88 | Kinda suits | HBO::PETERSEN | | Wed Aug 10 1988 12:11 | 11 |
|
> Do you prefer black or grey?
Both! Depends on your hair color, you
decide which is best. If you have gray
hair, go for the black! Any other color,
go gray!
How far do you live?? And when can you be
here??
|
31.90 | Good things come to those wearing ties | HBO::PETERSEN | | Wed Aug 10 1988 15:01 | 10 |
|
I know RANCHO is in CA. That's why I asked how long???
I can wait 6 hours.....hey Bob, lemme know your ETA,
I'll meet you at the airport, unless, of course, you
are wearing a -brown- tie. Then maybe I'll let the
moonies get you.
|
31.91 | | QUARK::LIONEL | May you live in interesting times | Wed Aug 10 1988 16:51 | 4 |
| Hmm... I'm a lot closer to Chelmsford than Bob is... can dig out
my nice Brooks Brothers suit... :-)
Steve
|
31.92 | Ties can be a lure! | HBO::PETERSEN | | Wed Aug 10 1988 17:16 | 12 |
|
Brooks Brothers???? (pant pant) ?!?!
But what about the tie? How many do you have?
How many different colors?
See guys..your wearing ties *is* really appreciated.
Even though it may be uncomfortable and hinder your
productivity, a tie can enhance a *different* kind
of productivity...and, well, look at the effect they
have on me! I am an absolute sucker for a tie......
Bo
|
31.93 | Yeah, and tailored for me too... | QUARK::LIONEL | May you live in interesting times | Wed Aug 10 1988 17:37 | 11 |
| I have whole bunches of ties - I never wear a brown one (my suit
is dark grey). I don't find suits and ties uncomfortable - I like
the way I look in them. I only wear them on certain occasions -
not to work (unless I'm doing a customer visit). The ties I wear
most often are solid grey or blue, blue with red and gold diagonal
stripes, or red with blue and gold "diamonds" (not sure how to
describe it). Looks sharp. I have a gold and onyx tie tack to
go with it. (Have gold and onyx cuff links too, but only for special
occasions!)
Steve
|
31.94 | What you mean, "tailored too?" | HBO::PETERSEN | | Wed Aug 10 1988 17:50 | 16 |
|
Brown ties, I must admit, have never appealed to me -
and black goes along with it.
Grey and blue seem to be my favorites, and have rarely seen
a tie I didn't like in these colors (except, of course,
on Paul Simon).
So....uh.......ya got all these ties, eh? [see .51]
(teehee)
Bo
|
31.95 | | QUARK::LIONEL | May you live in interesting times | Wed Aug 10 1988 18:17 | 7 |
| I mean I went to a tailor and had the suit altered to fit me perfectly.
It cost only $35 and was well worth it. Luckily I haven't changed
my size all that much since I bought the suit!
Gee... Chelmsford is only 10 minutes away....
Steve
|
31.96 | | RANCHO::HOLT | Don't go soft on me Joe | Wed Aug 10 1988 22:54 | 14 |
|
One of mine is a Givenchy, black, side vents, pin stripes.
With my "ic mask" tie, I use it to impress customers...
Another one is a "no name" from the local volume outlet. Its
comfortable and baggy in all the right places (lost 20lbs since
I bought it)..
I like wearing it with some of my Dads old 1940s era ties (blinding
patterns, 2 hands wide) or my yellow leather tie an inch wide...
|
31.97 | combo! | LAMHRA::WHORLOW | Abseiling is a real let-down! | Wed Aug 10 1988 23:41 | 7 |
| G'day from Downunder,
My wife sometimes makes her own dresses and I get a tie from the
off-cuts. Got some _real_ jazzy ties and we match!
derek
|
31.98 | Suits suit me just fine | HBO::PETERSEN | | Thu Aug 11 1988 09:27 | 10 |
|
re: 95
10 minutes away, eh? So where do we have "lunch"???
Wear dark blue!
|
31.99 | | HBO::PETERSEN | | Thu Aug 11 1988 09:35 | 7 |
|
Sorry Bob, you are too far away -
but the Givenchy is something to imagine.
Bo_who_is_obsessed_with_suits_and_ties
|
31.101 | | HBO::PETERSEN | | Thu Aug 11 1988 09:54 | 9 |
|
Sounds good, CASVO1::.
Sounds like a marvy combination!
What does FWIW mean? ;^)
Bo
|
31.103 | | HBO::PETERSEN | | Thu Aug 11 1988 11:41 | 10 |
|
Like I said before, jeans with ties, and oh, especially
with the sleeves rolled up! Men's forearms are one of my
favorite parts of the body.
45 ties?? Where did you say you were?
Bo
|
31.105 | No title | HBO::PETERSEN | | Thu Aug 11 1988 12:13 | 18 |
|
ugh....you looked me up in ELF, and discovered
the family secret, my *real* name (smarty). It's
only used legally, and my heart palpatates (sp?)
when I hear it. People call me that at the strangest
times....
Snowmen *do* wear ties well. So do men with dark
tans, dogs, construction workers who interfere with
your trying to get to work (they serve a great purpose
here - lasso the workers and drag them for taking to
long and making us poor, un-air-conditioned folk suffer
in the heat).
Bernardine, eh?
Bo
|
31.106 | | ASIC::EDECK | Happy 85th, Harley D. | Thu Aug 11 1988 12:20 | 6 |
|
Somewhere in here, there should be a GREAT pun about "Bo Ties..."
;-)
Ed E.
|
31.108 | Tie One Off Please | ISTARI::CONNOR | On no! Not Another Light Bulb Joke | Thu Aug 11 1988 12:54 | 6 |
| To me ties are a form of fashion slavery and I feel choked
in them. I also always manage to get them in the soup and/or
spill sauce on them; the result being that they cant be cleaned.
Cant the fashion folks come up with an advanced idea. The dam
ties have been around for years. Anyway would the women prefer
a view of our sexy hairy chests? :-)
|
31.109 | | HBO::PETERSEN | | Thu Aug 11 1988 14:45 | 10 |
|
re: 108
No view of the hairy chest, please. Leave something
for our imagination (women have that too, ya know).
Bo_ties_for_Paul_Simon
|
31.110 | It's not a rope - it's a tie!!! | CASV01::SALOIS | Fatal Attraction is holding me fast | Thu Aug 11 1988 14:46 | 12 |
|
On the subject of ties; there's just one pet peeve I have. I just
hate seeing someone wearing a tie that ends in the middle of his
stomach, or worse, a tie that covers his pants zipper. A tie should
end right at the top of the belt buckle.
And let's not forget men who just don't know how to tie a tie!
There's always one guy who looks like he's got this horse knot
around his neck, where his collar can't stay down because of the
large size of the knot.
If you wear a tie, wear it right!
|
31.112 | | HBO::PETERSEN | | Thu Aug 11 1988 15:35 | 9 |
|
Silly goose,
we have *imaginations* too! I noticed alot of men
prefer to have women hiding some sort of their body,
for the imagination.
Well, we like it too!
|
31.114 | Tall ties? | QUARK::LIONEL | May you live in interesting times | Thu Aug 11 1988 17:15 | 10 |
| Re: .110
I sometimes have trouble with getting the length right, being so
tall. I find if I let it go down to the belt buckle, it folds up
in my lap when I sit down. I figure that if I get the small end
to come to just below the label on the back of the big end that
I've done ok. Most ties are a bit too short for me, though, so
this may affect things.
Steve
|
31.115 | | RANCHO::HOLT | Who stole the kishkas? | Thu Aug 11 1988 17:19 | 6 |
|
I always thought ties were supposed to end halfway down the
shirt front.
My uncle in Milwaukee will be suprised to hear that.
|
31.116 | Are you near NH??? | CASV01::SALOIS | Fatal Attraction is holding me fast | Fri Aug 12 1988 08:52 | 20 |
|
RE.114
There's a shop in the Manchester, NH Mall, that I get my ties
at. I too, am tall, and have a hard time finding ties that will
fit. Can't remember the name of it, but all they sell are ties
and belts.
As far as Bob's uncle, gee, that's a shame, someone will have
to break the news to him.
Ties are not just a rope around your neck. A tie can say alot
about your sense of style. Some men could take a few lessons from
the ladies, because a tie, like a belt or a purse or jewelry on
a woman, is an accessory, and should go with the outfit you're wearing.
And the styles they have out nowadays really gives you some good
choices.
|
31.117 | | QUARK::LIONEL | May you live in interesting times | Fri Aug 12 1988 11:16 | 18 |
| Re: .116
Yes, I am in Nashua, and I've seen that shop, but haven't liked
the ties they sell. Oh well.... I'll keep looking.
Related to ties - a couple of products that tie-wearers might be
interested in. My favorite silk tie had a stain on it, and I
didn't know if it would come out. I found a product (at a CVS
drugstore) called "Outright", that explicitly mentions that it
works for silk. Whattya know - it does! Wonderful!
I also picked up a bottle of "Tie Protector Spray" from Brookstone,
which supposedly, when applied to a tie, allows you to just blot
off spills. Again, it says it's good for silk. I have put it on
my tie - doesn't seem to hurt it - but can't yet attest to its
protective abilities.
Steve
|
31.118 | | RANCHO::HOLT | Rastaman no pickpocket | Fri Aug 12 1988 12:07 | 8 |
|
There is a specialty tie store in Monterey, Ca. I'll see if
I can dig up an address.
My uncle is simple Slovak folk, funloving and with no
pretensions to grandeur. Somehow I hardly think it matters...
A Teflon tie would be a great advance for humanity, however...
|
31.119 | a little bit of Christmas | IAMOK::KOSKI | It's in the way that you use it | Fri Aug 12 1988 12:24 | 6 |
| RE: Hairy chests et al
A tie on a man is like a bow on a present. It makes the package
more complete and is often quite fun to unwrap. 8^)
Gail
|
31.120 | AAAARRGGGGHHHH, GGGLGGLGAGGGL, HELP!!!!!!!!!!!! | CASV01::SALOIS | Fatal Attraction is holding me fast | Fri Aug 12 1988 13:10 | 10 |
|
"A tie on a man is like a bow on a present. It makes the package
more complete and is often quite fun to unwrap. 8^)"
But, please, please, ladies; make sure you know how to untie a
tie first!! You don't want to go choking the guy before you get
the package unwrapped!!! It's not fun watching your Christmas
present turn blue!!!
8*)
|
31.121 | me first :-]#>>>>>> | SKYLRK::OLSON | green chile crusader! | Fri Aug 12 1988 13:17 | 4 |
| And for something quite a bit less compelling; invent a smiley icon
wearing a tie.
DougO
|
31.122 | | CLBMED::KLEINBERGER | Dont worry, Be happy | Sun Aug 14 1988 10:09 | 3 |
| RE: .120
So, are you going to tell us, or wait til we learn the ackward way?
|
31.123 | BULLETIN. . .BULLETIN. . . | HANDY::MALLETT | Situation hopeless but not serious | Sun Aug 14 1988 18:37 | 20 |
|
This just in from the wires of United Press Unintentional:
Dateline Chelmsford, Ma:
37 men were injured today, four seriously, in what local authorities
are describing as a "stampede". Eye witnesses describe a "kind
of rumbling like thunder or an earthquake" then report seeing "a
sea of guys dressed in suits and ties" descending on the residence
of one Bo Pederson of Chelmsford. In the words of one witness,
"It was a horrible scene. . .they were all trampling over one another
and screaming stuff like "Brooks Brothers", "Calvin", "Botany",
and "Yves, Yves". It was like some kind of mass hysteria"
Although Ms. Pederson was unavailable for comment, one neighbor
claims she remarked that "Well, yeah, I suppose it was a little messy,
but it was the *best dressed* mess you've ever seen!"
Details and film at 11.
|
31.124 | Might as well let him have both barrels | HANDY::MALLETT | Situation hopeless but not serious | Sun Aug 14 1988 18:40 | 10 |
| re: .115
While you're at it, you might as well let him know that there
are other fabric choices besides polyester and other patterns
available than hand-painted, day-glow nudes.
It came as a shock to me, too.
Steve
|
31.125 | | QUARK::LIONEL | In Search of the Lost Code | Sun Aug 14 1988 22:38 | 5 |
| Re: .123
At least spell her name right - it's "Petersen".
Steve
|
31.127 | Here they come! | HBO::PETERSEN | | Mon Aug 15 1988 09:29 | 11 |
|
re: 121
Thanks, Steve, for mentioning the correction of my name.
I wasn't available for comment because I was *under*
that stampede.
Loved every minute of it...
|
31.128 | Man shoots self in foot. . . | HANDY::MALLETT | Philosopher Clown | Mon Aug 15 1988 09:57 | 7 |
| re: .125
I never did trust that reporter to get his stuff straight. . .
(other) Steve (appropriately red-faced, submitting editorial
retrations, etc)
|
31.130 | Clip on ties and Buster Brown shoes.... | CASV02::SALOIS | Fatal Attraction is holding me fast | Tue Aug 16 1988 08:57 | 11 |
| .129
A CLIP-ON!?!?!?!?!!!!
No, say it ain't so, Joe!!
Men really don't wear clip-on ties, do they?
Last time I wore a cip-on tie, I was 6 years old and it was Easter
Sunday.
Ooooh! How gauche!
8*)
|
31.131 | clip-ons have their use | NSSG::FEINSMITH | | Tue Aug 16 1988 10:57 | 8 |
| RE. 130, clip-on's have a use even today. When I was a cop, we used
clipons, so the tie couldn't be used as a grip. Its rather amusing
to watch some troublemaker grab you by the tie, only to have it
snap off in his hand. Also, clip-ons can be handy if you work around
moving machinery.
Eric
|
31.132 | On the removal of ties | QUARK::LIONEL | In Search of the Lost Code | Sun Aug 21 1988 20:05 | 9 |
| Re: .129
Though pulling the narrow end of the tie through the knot is the
way I most often remove one, I have read in several places that
this is a "no-no", as it crumples the narrow part of the tie.
Supposedly, the "right" way to remove the tie is to undo the knot
in the reverse manner of how you tied it.
Steve
|
31.133 | On cause and effect | STAR::BECK | | Mon Aug 22 1988 01:10 | 7 |
| The proper way to remove a necktie is with scissors, as it leaves
the silly thing obviously useless.
One thing I notice around ZK is when there are large numbers of ties
in evidence, there are no parking spaces available. (My usual
comment when this happens is "the overhead is under foot".) Outlaw
ties, and we won't have any more trouble finding places to park.
|
31.134 | handy household hint... | ASIC::EDECK | One Income, No Kids:OINK! | Tue Aug 23 1988 12:38 | 5 |
|
The proper way to remove a tie is with a chainsaw. Used correctly,
this method also eliminates unsightly 5 o'clock shadow.
Works on belts, too.
|
31.135 | Ties in the news | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Jan 25 1991 13:59 | 51 |
| From: LILITH::CALLAS "This message sent with 100% recycled bits 25-Jan-1991 1336" 25-JAN-1991 13:51:29.59
To: ERISTOCRACY
CC:
Subj: Sometimes a tie is just a tie
From: BLUMON::GORDON "WAYLAY is currently unavailable - mail to {BLUMON|LOWELL}::GORDON 13-Sep-1990 1030" 13 September '90 10:35 am
To: WEIRD_STUFF
CC: VALM,JON,MRMIKE::ROSEN,STAR::MANN
Subj: ties...
From: MRKTNG::SZKLARZ "We'll paint it!" 13-SEP-1990 10:14:30.33
To: DOUG
CC:
Subj: neckties...
From: HYEND::CSKERRY "13-Sep-1990 0953" 13-SEP-1990 09:53:46.20
To: @PERS.DIS
CC:
Subj: Female Boss bans Neckties????
FEMALE BOSS BANS NECKTIES AS PHALLIC SYMBOLS
-- The Sraits Times, 29-Aug-1990, Singapore.
Hanover (West Germany) -- Male civil servants in a West German office are
hot under the collar after their female boss banned neckties as phallic
symbols.
The order has sparked a knotty sexism row in the State Culture Ministry in
the northern state of Lower Saxony.
"I want to know...if bureaucrats wearing ties will be prosecuted as sexual
exhibitionists," former culture minister Horst Horrmann said in a written
question to the state legislature.
His successor, Ms Helga Schuchard, has apparently ordered male employees in
her ministry to end the centuries-old fashion.
Her spokesman confirmed that the minister twice told staff not to wear
ties, but this was because of a mid-summer heat wave.
"However, the word phallus may have come up," the spokesman said.
The Bild newspaper quoted sex researcher Volker Zimmermann yesterday as
saying: "A tie is a sign of strength and masculinity."
Mr Peter Spoor, a police inspector, was cynical: "The woman should ask
herself if she should keep buying bananas. They are phallic symbols, too."
--Rueter.
|
31.136 | | BIGUN::SIMPSON | Damn your lemon curd tartlet! | Sun Jan 27 1991 00:05 | 2 |
| Unfortunately, for some people anything longer than it is wide is a
phallic symbol...
|