T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
74.1 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Jul 21 1994 15:56 | 5 |
| I tend to agree with Ann here, though it's likely that the writer worked in
an "open office" where it would be difficult to hide grooming activities.
Even in office cubbies, I'd vote for doing it in the bathroom, not the office.
Steve
|
74.2 | No biting, otherwise OK | LEDS::LEWICKE | FOR CONGRESS!!! (again) | Thu Jul 21 1994 16:13 | 5 |
| I figure it's OK as long as one uses a toenail clipper or a pair of
dikes. Biting them in an office setting is clearly unacceptable. You
might even fall off of your chair and have to apply for workmen's comp.
John
|
74.3 | Socks and Missiles | GEMVAX::WILLIAMSON | | Thu Jul 21 1994 16:45 | 9 |
| For a woman wearing panty hose, removing one's "socks" might create
an even greater stir than the actual toenail clipping, especially
if she hung her "socks" over the cubicle wall. Also, especially
hardened big toenails occasionally fly off the clippers and could
land in unintended locations (someone's morning coffee!!).
No..no..no.....Clipping shoud definitely be done in private!
Kris
|
74.4 | | DSSDEV::RUST | | Thu Jul 21 1994 17:22 | 14 |
| I believe Miss Manners' usual take on these things is "No harm, no
foul," in the sense that if you can get away with it without anybody
seeing you, it's OK, but if someone might walk by at any moment and be
treated to the toenail-clipping or whatever, you should take yourself
somewhere with a door. [Emergencies that don't permit a dash to the
bathroom - sudden, messy sneezes, for example - must be handled on a
case by case basis...]
'course, if it's a shared office space, I would hope that not only
would the clipping be done discreetly but that the remains would be
decently disposed of; it would be truly gross to sit down at your desk
and find your feet crunching on somebody else's nail clippings. ;-)
-b
|
74.5 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Jul 21 1994 17:32 | 8 |
| Re: .4
Au contraire, Miss Manners has frequently stated her opinion that grooming is
best done in private. She doesn't care for the "well, it's natural!"
attitude. I'll see if I can find a reference in my copy of her "Guide to
Excruciatingly Correct Behavior".
Steve
|
74.6 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Jul 21 1994 21:38 | 19 |
| The closest I could find that seemed relevant was this:
Dear Miss Manners:
I know that picking the teeth is considered gauche in this country,
but other cultures are more sensible about the discomfort of food
stuck in the mouth. What do you think?
Gentle Reader:
Miss Manners realizes that dislodging food from the teeth is one of
life's great sensual pleasures, and believes that great sensual
pleasure should be enjoyed in private.
I know I have read a number of her columns in which she is adamant
that grooming should never be done in public.
Steve
|
74.7 | Miss Manners - Guardian of Decency | SECOP1::CLARK | | Thu Jul 21 1994 22:31 | 10 |
| Clipping one's toenails in a work environment? Even if it was done in
the person's cubicle, that's disgusting. Hopefully the next time this
person commits such a gross breach of etiquette, and upsets those with
extremely developed senses of what is decent, that all those upset will
band together and stomp the ignoramus into a bloody pulp. I am not sure
Miss Manners has a point of view on this or not but I am sure she would
stress that the stompers maintain a sense of manners while stomping,
"Oh, I AM so sorry. By all means you should go ahead of me in kicking
this social misfit's face to a pulp. I shall wait my turn as taught me
by Miss Manners."
|
74.8 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Jul 22 1994 09:51 | 5 |
| Miss Manners would also say that one does not "enforce" etiquette
but one may privately approach the offender later and communicate
their displeasure in a kind fashion.
Steve
|
74.9 | | DSSDEV::RUST | | Fri Jul 22 1994 10:19 | 15 |
| I think my interpretation of Miss Manners' views on the matter is in
accord with yours for the most part - if I'm allowed to define
"private" as "anywhere where nobody will see what you're doing". *If*
one can render one's office or cubicle "private" for the required
period of time, I don't see a difference between that and retiring to
the loo <well, other than in the ease of disposing of the evidence!>.
However, I'll concede that there are a percentage of folks who don't
seem to realize when they're in full view of others (or perhaps they
just don't care), as evidenced not only by the toenail-clipping guy of
the base note but also by the people who sit in their cars at
stoplights a few feet away from the folks in the next car, and pick
their teeth (or other parts of their anatomies)...
-b
|
74.10 | what's next? | MROA::MAHONEY | | Tue Jul 26 1994 10:29 | 13 |
| It's too bad we have to rely in "miss Manners"... if we need her advise
means we don't have much manners of our own... if we still think we can do
such a thing at work!
I agree it is disgusting and should be done in private. (it must be
very "pleasant" to do business and shake hands with a person who has just
manipulated their feet! juck!)
Oh well, who knows what to expect in the future... (maybe a bed-pan
under the desk by the PC... ? after all "nature's call" is also
natural...)
Sorry, I could not resist! Ana
|