T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1247.1 | | MRPTH1::16.34.80.132::slab | [email protected] | Mon May 19 1997 12:24 | 4 |
|
Supposedly this is about the "real" dinosaur haven ... the first
movie focused on the man-made copy of that haven.
|
1247.2 | | DPE1::ARMSTRONG | | Mon May 19 1997 14:17 | 10 |
| > <<< Note 1247.1 by MRPTH1::16.34.80.132::slab "[email protected]" >>>
>
>Supposedly this is about the "real" dinosaur haven ... the first
>movie focused on the man-made copy of that haven.
Lost World is about an island that contained the real 'factory'
where the dinosaurs for Jurassic Park were produced....Jurassic Park
was the showplace, and this island housed the factory. When the park
was destroyed, the factory was abandoned...and the dinos were left to fend
for themselves.
|
1247.3 | | STRATA::GARRITY | | Mon May 19 1997 14:36 | 4 |
| I believe the old guy(Richard Attenborough..sp?) is in this as well. I
guess Golblum knows a good thing when he sees it.
This movie should be fun..
|
1247.4 | I think Attenborough is just a cameo. | QUARRY::reeves | Jon Reeves, UNIX compiler group | Mon May 19 1997 15:39 | 6 |
| Key players this time, besides Goldblum and Moore, are Vince Vaughn from
Swingers (recommended, BTW); Arliss Howard from Wong Foo; Peter Stormare,
the white-haired killer from Fargo; and Pete Postlethwaite, from lots of stuff
(but possibly most relevant, the lawyer Kobayashi from The Usual Suspects).
That's not true, though; the key players are really the new dinosaur species.
|
1247.5 | | MRPTH1::16.34.80.132::slab | [email protected] | Mon May 19 1997 16:38 | 3 |
|
I thought Arliss Howard was great in "Plainclothes".
|
1247.6 | | MARVEL::DAVIDC | Don't lose your head. | Tue May 20 1997 03:29 | 10 |
|
Re: -1 "Plainclothes"
Great flick... seen it at least 3 times and it never seems to lose its
appeal. Good one.
Chris D.
|
1247.7 | | WRKSYS::LASKY | | Tue May 20 1997 17:49 | 5 |
| I read the book and not nearly as good as the first but like was said
earlier the dinosaurs and special effects will be the stars. I'll be
standing in line!!
Bart
|
1247.8 | Forget the book. | QUARRY::reeves | Jon Reeves, UNIX compiler group | Wed May 21 1997 13:12 | 3 |
| Spielberg has said that he took a couple ideas from the book and threw the
rest away, so whether the book was good or not will have little to do with
the movie.
|
1247.9 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Thu May 22 1997 10:15 | 10 |
| > <<< Note 1247.8 by QUARRY::reeves "Jon Reeves, UNIX compiler group" >>>
> -< Forget the book. >-
>
>Spielberg has said that he took a couple ideas from the book and threw the
>rest away, so whether the book was good or not will have little to do with
>the movie.
Who wrote the screen play for this one (and the first one)?
- tom]
|
1247.10 | Koepp and/or Crichton | QUARRY::reeves | Jon Reeves, UNIX compiler group | Thu May 22 1997 16:02 | 5 |
| David Koepp wrote both screenplays; Crichton has a co-writer credit on the
first (not clear who did how much there).
Koepp said somewhere that it will say on his tombstone "he took too long
to get to the island". Presumably he won't make that mistake this time.
|
1247.11 | grrrrrrrrrrr... | SWAM1::MEUSE_DA | | Fri May 23 1997 17:08 | 8 |
|
Somebody here saw it at a special screening.
Lots of people get eaten, lots of gory stuff. He said
not for little kids.
Sounds great to me.
Dave
|
1247.12 | New Record Holder. | POLAR::TYSICK | Prying Open my Third Eye | Mon May 26 1997 09:51 | 6 |
| It beat all other box office weekend openings with a total of 86
million!?!
But the reviews I've heard from average Joe's hasn't been overwhelming.
Jay
|
1247.13 | | MRPTH1::16.121.160.231::slab | [email protected] | Mon May 26 1997 16:38 | 5 |
|
$86M?
Doesn't that beat the previous record by about $30M?
|
1247.14 | After one weekend! | POLAR::TYSICK | Prying Open my Third Eye | Mon May 26 1997 16:42 | 3 |
| I'm not sure but it's about 4 million away from breaking even, I think?
Jay
|
1247.15 | | MRPTH1::16.121.160.234::slab | [email protected] | Tue May 27 1997 02:07 | 4 |
|
Yeah, and they'll make that off of the McDonald's Happy Meal toys
alone.
|
1247.16 | | TUXEDO::FRIDAY | DCE: The real world is distributed too. | Tue May 27 1997 11:09 | 14 |
| We saw it on last Friday.
When compared with the original this movie is disappointing.
However, it is enjoyable.
The book was more interesting. I didn't like the way
major portions of the movie were reset into a different
environment.
Especially disappointing was how poorly the movie adapted
the scene where the lawyer gets his just deserts.
And the ending is a tad lame-brained too.
|
1247.17 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Tue May 27 1997 12:17 | 14 |
| > <<< Note 1247.14 by POLAR::TYSICK "Prying Open my Third Eye" >>>
> -< After one weekend! >-
>
> I'm not sure but it's about 4 million away from breaking even, I think?
No, not by a long shot.
The "box office take" is retail ticket revenue. From that subtract
the theatre's share, the distributor's share, and the producer's marketing
expenses, and you're getting close to the mythical "net" that is what
is needed to offset the producer's production budget.
I have no idea how big those slices are.
- tom]
|
1247.18 | Some back-of-envelope economics | QUARRY::reeves | Jon Reeves, UNIX compiler group | Tue May 27 1997 12:35 | 23 |
| >The "box office take" is retail ticket revenue. From that subtract
>the theatre's share, the distributor's share, and the producer's marketing
>expenses, and you're getting close to the mythical "net" that is what
>is needed to offset the producer's production budget.
On a big movie on opening weekend, the theatre gets maybe 10% (which is why
the concessions are so expensive: that's where they can make money). Though
I believe there is a "nut" figure that they get to keep on top of the 10%.
P&A (prints and advertising) is paid by the distributor out of their share.
Reportedly, almost 5000 prints of The Lost World were struck (this may be a
record). Tyngsboro, for instance, is running 3 prints on 6 screens (using
interlock projection).
I'm told that my earlier estimate of $2000/print is low. At 130 minutes, the
print is 7 reels; it's probably more like $4000-5000/print, so that's
$25 million, plus shipping costs. Plus advertising, which is probably
in the same ballpark (I notice they cheaped out on newspaper ads, but the
posters were more expensive than usual, and I don't watch TV, but I'd guess
it's been advertised heavily there).
So it'll be another week before TLW breaks even :-). Of course, foreign and
ancillary income will be huge. This may be the first billion dollar movie.
|
1247.19 | cow-eating | AVANT::CHOU | | Tue May 27 1997 13:40 | 5 |
| I couldn't stand the scene where the cow was been eaten alive and was
screaming his tail off in the Jurassic Park (first one). I didn't have
much problem with the man-eating scenes for some reason. Does this one
have really hair-rising scenes? I'm actually more interested in the
special effects than anything else.
|
1247.20 | The Lost World - Some Questions | DONVAN::SCOPA | | Tue May 27 1997 14:02 | 45 |
| Well I saw this film last night and I have some questions...I'll put
these questions/comments behind a form feed so as not to spoil the
movie for those who haven't seen it yet....
I wasn't sure if it was necessary for Jeff Goldblum's character to
have his daughter in the movie....a lot of questions were raised
regarding the mother. And how can a girl who was so visibly shaken and
frightened earlier in the film have anough courage to perform that feat
later on?
I think they should have subtitled the movie "The Perils of Sarah" as
Julianne Moore's character had at least 9 lives. I still can't figure
out how she could hold on to that roof with one hand while dismantling
the roof with the other hand.
Then there's the mystery of the ship's crew. How did they die? The
T-Rex was in the cargo hold. I don't remember...did the T-Rex jump out
of that cargo bay? Right!
I guess regarding continuity one of the problems I had was when Jeff
Goldblum hurt his leg and was visibly limping. Boy he was moving pretty
good when dodging those rapters. I guess Fear heals all wounds.
The ending was kinda shakey...the T-Rex nudging his son to do
the killing? Boy that fist-sized brain was really working overtime.
I'd also like to know what happened to that girl on the beach. Guess
they saved her huh? Yet that guy (blood in the stream) couldn't survive
the attack.
I won't get into the rope/trailer thing. I was thinking about that
happening BEFORE it did but figured that Spielberg would do something
to make it credible. I felt bad for that guy...talk about giving
everything you've got. And why did those T-Rex parents come back?
How about the guy who was stomped on by the T-Rex. The animal carries
the guy on the bottom of his foot for a few paces then the guy falls
off and is still alive...although he obviously is a goner.
I got the feeling that a lot was left on the cutting room floor. It
will be interesting to see if the home video version will be longer and
have footage not shown in theaters.
MJS
|
1247.21 | | SMURF::TOMG | | Tue May 27 1997 17:57 | 15 |
| Overall, I thought it was fine for what it was. I went in not expecting
much in the way of story, and I wasn't disappointed. :-)
On the technical side, the sound and picture were great.
Spoiler follows
: Then there's the mystery of the ship's crew. How did they die? The
: T-Rex was in the cargo hold. I don't remember...did the T-Rex jump out
: of that cargo bay? Right!
My son and I immediately thought that raptors had somehow gotten on the
ship. Perhaps this is the setup for the sequel? :-)
|
1247.22 | | SNAX::NOONAN | sing the soul's blues | Wed May 28 1997 02:44 | 17 |
| >On a big movie on opening weekend, the theatre gets maybe 10% (which is why
>the concessions are so expensive: that's where they can make money). Though
>I believe there is a "nut" figure that they get to keep on top of the 10%.
Per Entertainment Weekly's report on skyrocketing ticket prices:
Where does your $9 go? For a major-studio blockbuster like The Fifth
Element, studios can get as much as 80 percent of ticket revenues (or
$7.20) for opening weekend, leaving 20 percent (or $1.80) for
exhibitors. Over the film's run, it gets closer to 50 - 50. But
exhibitors often get a juicier cut of low-budget films to entice them
to take chances. And they keep the loot from Skittles sales.
E
|
1247.23 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Wed May 28 1997 10:06 | 7 |
| > <<< Note 1247.18 by QUARRY::reeves "Jon Reeves, UNIX compiler group" >>>
> -< Some back-of-envelope economics >-
>I don't watch TV, but I'd guess
>it's been advertised heavily there).
Actually, it hasn't been advertised so much, because the free PR has been so
extensive.
|
1247.24 | good but.... | SUBPAC::GOLDIE | Resident Alien | Wed May 28 1997 10:36 | 8 |
|
saw it yesterday and enjoyed it.Story line isn;t really as good as the
original but the effects are better(if you can believe that)
ian
|
1247.25 | Beautiful effects, but not enraptored by the plot | TLE::RALTO | Bow to Chairman Bill | Thu May 29 1997 14:58 | 28 |
| > Spielberg has said that he took a couple ideas from the book and threw the
> rest away...
And used "King Kong" for the rest of his ideas. At least it's more
watchable than DeLaurentis' (sp?) remake.
I like Jeff Goldblum pretty well, but in this movie he seems to be
struggling to "find" his character from the original JP. He seems
to drift between that character and the one he played in "Independence
Day".
There were enough inconsistencies and disbelief-suspension-busters
here to be noticeable in "real time" while watching the movie, and
that detracted from the experience for me.
As it turns out, my favorite scene in the movie was (behind spoiler
warning):
...when the T-Rex angrily chomped off the red traffic light. :-)
Any motorist can eagerly identify with that...
It was nice to see the kids from the original film again, albeit a
bit jarring. I didn't realize how much time had indeed passed since
the first film. Ouch...
Chris
|
1247.26 | Question about ship deaths | FABSIX::S_MARCHESSAU | | Sun Jun 01 1997 11:52 | 5 |
| Question: How did the crew of the ship bringing Mr. Rex into the city
get killed (or should I say, chewed) off??? I thought Mr. Rex was the
only beast on board... The infant wasn't on board and wasn't old
enough to do that kind of damage by himself...That was the only part I
couldn't figure out!!! HELP
|
1247.27 | A possible mechanism, but no explanation | TLE::RALTO | Bow to Chairman Bill | Sun Jun 01 1997 22:59 | 13 |
| Spoiler warning regarding the previous reply:
I believe it had something to do with the fact that there was
a hand gripping the remote control for the cargo bay door.
Beyond that, I haven't figured it out yet, and I probably won't
bother pursuing it much further, having already spent four hours
watching this movie twice. (First time was to "check it out" to
decide whether to bring the younger kiddos.) I did get more out
of it the second time, mostly dialog that I'd missed the first time
through.
Chris
|
1247.28 | It wasn't a thinking movie, that was for sure. | EVMS::MDNITE::RIVERS | No comment | Mon Jun 02 1997 11:11 | 51 |
| Possible explanation behind spoiler warningf:
When discussing the whole "how the hell did the Trex run amok on the
ship?" scenario, it was posited that
a) the T-rex was woken from its slumber (as mentioned by one of the
Ingen cronies on the dock). This must have been done with Cargo Doors
open.
b) T-rex broke free of its restraints, then stomped up out of the cargo
bay to trundle around the ship and eat almost everybody.
c) somehow, it was lured BACK into the cargo back and the Last Guy (the
hand on the remote) managed to mostly close the doors before the T-rex
got him. As seen, the cargo doors didn't shut all the way, for some
weird reason (maybe T-rex was banging on them).
I didn't think this sounded plausible because
a) T-rex has been shown to be careless about containers holding food
items. (witness: smashed cars, exhibits, trucks, gas stations, etc.)
T-rex would not so delicately stomp around deck of ship without
damaging the superstructure--the ship's deck looked pretty pristine.
T-rex wasn't so delicate of an eater to daintly reach into pilot house
and remove crewmember from his hand without damaging the door, the
windows, etc. It's head was too big just to reach in and snatch the
guy and I find it hard to believe the crew member was standing
conveniently outside the door to be snatched up.
b) Arm With Remote to Cargo Doors seemed much to far away from them to
have managed to be part of whoever lured T-rex back into the cargo bay
and yet, still managed to get mostly eaten.
c) It didn't make sense that the cargo doors were opened in the first
place to let him out -- the humans could have used human-sized doors to
go down to the cargo hold to wake him up or whatever they did.
Of course, it was all very silly by this time, so maybe we really were
supposed to believe the T-rex was the one who killed the crew, then
piloted the out of control ship neatly and exactly where it was
supposed to be doing anyway.
My theory: Some raptors snuck aboard the ship and wrought havok among
the crew, escaped to San Diego while everybody was chasing the T-rex
(or rather, being chased BY the T-rex) and thus, provide handy-dandy
sequel material. :)
kim
|
1247.29 | | ACISS2::s_coghill.dyo.dec.com::CoghillS | Steve Coghill, NSIS Solution Architect | Mon Jun 02 1997 11:23 | 1 |
| A fun movie. I especially liked the "Godzilla" take-off.
|
1247.30 | King Kong vs. Godzilla | FABSIX::S_MARCHESSAU | | Mon Jun 02 1997 13:10 | 3 |
| When I saw Mr T. Rex going into the city, I'm yelling, where is King
Kong when you need him. They replaced his heart, he should be here
defended the city...
|
1247.31 | Clarification to .28: | QUARRY::reeves | Jon Reeves, UNIX compiler group | Tue Jun 03 1997 14:34 | 2 |
| I think T. was in the cage-like thing on the main deck. Which removes
quibble #3.
|
1247.32 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Wed Jun 04 1997 10:29 | 34 |
| This was a really really REALLY disappointing movie.
"Cheesy" is probably the best word I can find for it.
If Spielberg just wanted to show off how neat he could do dinosaurs,
he should have done a SIGGRAPH electronic theatre reel or a PBS special
on animated effects and not tried to distract us with what should have
and easily could have been a good movie.
While I believe that the Lost World book was inferior to the Jurassic Park
book, there was plenty there to make a good story, almost all of which
was ignored for the screenplay. Plot holes aside (and I can understand
a certain need for deux ex machina or artistic license), there was virtually
no STORY left. Also NO suspense, and almost NO surprises.
And the cheesy Godzilla rip-off was insulting.
The screenwriter, whose name I can't spell despite asking about it
in an earlier reply, is also listed in the credits as one of the assistant
directors and the "unfortunate bastard" among the actors.
I think the last title says it all, and the ticket paying public deserved
co-billing on that score.
I won't accept the "mind candy" excuse for movie drivel of this type.
This wasn't a student reel on composition or lighting or directorial
technique or even special effects, this was a big-budget separate-the-fans-
from-their-money exercise and the fans deserved better.
I'll be extremely reluctant to see any future Spielberg movies,
even those reputed to be on par with his Schindler's List.
- tom]
(Does the second weekend gross indicate that this movie will have no legs,
no good word of mouth and repeat business?)
|