T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
96.1 | My advice - don't bother!!! | MUDHWK::LAWLER | Not turning 39... | Mon Mar 09 1992 12:26 | 52 |
|
Don't do it!
I own an EF/hutton ltd partnership which pays about $60/year
in "spendable" cash and generages about $150 in passive losses,
mostly due to depreciation.
Ever since TEFRA, it's been a tax nightmare.
The $60 gets treated as "ordinary income" (in my case) and
gets listed on the "Dividends" line of form 1040. (I don't
have to file schedule B.)
You also have to fill out "Schedule E" (Income from a
partnership) and something called form 8582, which basically
dis-allows any passive losses (unless they offset passive gains)
in the current year, and keeps a running tally of these
losses from year to year. (Apparantly you can take all
the disallowed losses the year you liquidate your interest
in the partnership.) I shudder to think about what's going
to happen the year it liquidates and I have to figure out
how to re-capture all the depreciation losses I couldn't
deduct...
The paperwork is a major headache to figure out, and the
instructions are full of things you can't do, but very little
help on how to actually fill out the forms.
(In my case, the LTD partnership is the _only_ reason I can't
file a 1040 EZ, so it's a major hassle, and not worth the
paperwork hassles, and doesn't generate enough cash to make
it worth paying a professional preparer.
This is my first year filling out the Mass (non-resident)
tax forms. I think it requires filling out a Mass schedule
E, listing the "Non-mass differences" (I.E. they don't do
business in Mass, and I don't live there, so it doesn't
affect my Mass tax liability, but I've still gotta figure
out the $%^& schedule E stuff, and attach a copy of my
federal Sched E and form 8582...
There's apparantly a move afoot to simplify the schedule K
reporting requirements for people with less than $1k of income,
but it's buried in a bigger tax package in congress which isn't
considered likely to pass...
In short, I'd happilly give up any income/deductible losses
to just get out from under the paperwork, but salvation doesn't
appear to be in sight... :^(
-al
|
96.2 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue Mar 10 1992 10:27 | 10 |
| I've been going through this headache ever since invested in a limited
partnership (which was a mistake on its own).
The good news (?) this year is that unless you've got offsetting gains,
you can't take a loss on passive activities (it's been phased out over
the last few years). I dutifully filled out my form 8582 and found that
I couldn't take the loss, so I just didn't file it.
Of course, if you've got a gain (I wish!), you'll have to file 8582 and
schedule E.
|
96.3 | I think you still have to fill it out... | MUDHWK::LAWLER | Not turning 39... | Tue Mar 10 1992 11:38 | 19 |
|
re -.1
Don't you _still_ have to file the schedule "E" even if
the losses aren't deductible?
I think the fact that you got a schedule K-1 gets reported to
the IRS, and you have to file the supporting paperwork whether
you want to or not, even if it has no immediate effect on your
tax situation.
(In a similar manner, could one simply "not" file schedule D
in the case of a stock transaction which results in a loss?)
-al
|
96.4 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue Mar 10 1992 13:19 | 1 |
| Not the way I read the instructions.
|
96.5 | I guess the IRS will straighten me out if I'm wrong | VINO::FLEMMING | Have XDELTA, will travel | Wed Mar 11 1992 06:35 | 4 |
| There are two lines on Schedule D for short and long term gains from
limited partnerships. Are you folks suggesting that if you only have
gains from the LP, that its not adequet to simply post them there and
not file Schedule E and/or 85xx?
|
96.6 | Sched D for when you finally liquidate | MUDHWK::LAWLER | Not turning 39... | Wed Mar 11 1992 07:45 | 10 |
|
I believe the "Schedule D" stuff is either for "Publicly traded
partnerships", or perhapse for use when you finally sell your
"units" - it does not deal with the "dividend" income that you
recieve every year from the partnership's operations.
-al
|
96.7 | N.B., K-1 explicitly say enter here an on Schedule D line xx. | VINO::FLEMMING | Have XDELTA, will travel | Wed Mar 11 1992 08:11 | 1 |
|
|
96.8 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Mar 11 1992 09:56 | 3 |
| There are also boxes on the K-1 that say "enter in line xx of 8582."
If these numbers are non-zero, you may have to file an 8582. If you
file an 8582, you have to file a schedule E.
|
96.9 | Back to the basics ... | JURAN::KITCHIN | | Thu Mar 12 1992 02:02 | 35 |
| Gerald: Al: Mr/Ms Flemming:
Before we get to how to fill out the tax forms, maybe you could help
me (and the readers of this note) understand the fundamentals of
such investments.
For simplicity, assume that the investment is in a publicly traded
Limited Partnership (I'm looking over a publicly traded Real Estate L.P.
that supposedly reported a 42% "dividend yield" for the 12 months
ending Spet 91. These ARE seductive, but there must me several things
wrong. However, let's focus on the tax implications of L.P
Distributions.
The distribution listed is actual cash you receive? I know
depreciation is an accounting device and that part of the distribution
is due to depreciation on the assests of the Partnership, but you
do receive in the "dividend check" actual money, right?
Two cases: (1) $100 in distributions for the tax year, $30 from the
earnings of the L.P and $70 from the depreciation of the assets.
(2) $100 in dsitributions for the tax year, $30 from
"somewhere" (return of capital?) because the L.P had NEGATIVE earnings
and $70 from the depreciation of assests.
Note, my investment goal is earning 3X money market on my
investment, while awaiting gain in the price of the L.P units for a
sale for captial gains. I will likely have other Short Term and Long
Term capitial gains with which to offset passive losses on the L.P,
so the restriction from deducting losses against earned income is
not a significant constraint for me. Also, if there is a rational
basis for the tax forms, I don't mind filling them out (with Taxcut
1040 software).
Comments?
John K
|
96.10 | | YQUEM::FLEMMING | Have XDELTA, will travel | Thu Mar 12 1992 07:44 | 4 |
| Re: 98.8
Now I'm really confused. I thought you only filed schedule E if you
were an active partner.
|
96.11 | Obfuscation aboundeth... | CSCOA1::SOVEREIGN_S | but once a knight is enough(?) | Sun Mar 15 1992 00:30 | 15 |
| Re: .10
Schedule E covers *any* partnership activity: active, passive, limited,
or otherwise. "Active" partners handle losses differently, as they
(sometimes) classify the loss as "non-passive".
Re: .9
Capital gain/loss doesn't help you offset *passive* losses. Only
"passive" income can be used to offset passive loss. Otherwise, it
just accumulates forever until you have some passive income to wash it
with. Capital gains can only offset capital losses.
"For most every loophole, there is a corresponding loop. If you don't
notice it at first, check your neck..."
SteveSov
|
96.12 | Correction (I think...) | MUDHWK::LAWLER | Not turning 39... | Mon Mar 16 1992 07:53 | 12 |
|
>Passive losses just accumulate forever until you have active
>income to wash it with...
Just a nit - I think _all_ accumulated passive losses are allowable
in the year you finally liquidate your interest in a Ltd. partnership,
regardless of whether you made or lost money in the sale of the units.
-al
|
96.13 | ...caught me again... | CSCOAC::SOVEREIGN_S | but once a knight is enough(?) | Mon Mar 16 1992 09:31 | 4 |
| Oh. Yup, I think you're right. (Subject to "at-risk limitations") I
have to keep reminding myself to remember the endpoints...
SteveSov
|