T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1134.1 | and people complain about Babylon 5!!! | SMURF::PETERT | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Mon Mar 01 1993 11:05 | 11 |
| Well, I sort of watched it. I.E. I had it on, but it didn't keep me
from reading the newpaper and other things. It was so engrossing
that I spent the last 1/2 hour or so watching some of the Outer
Limit's stuff I had taped the night before ;-) So, did the evil
mugwump in the many-tubed iron lung turn out to be Turner's uncle
as I was expecting, or did the uncle turn up in other ways.
And I don't know about you, but if I heard my computer hologram
coughing, I'd ask it what the hell was wrong!!
PeterT
|
1134.2 | | DSSDEV::RUST | | Mon Mar 01 1993 12:58 | 41 |
| It _was_ pretty rank, wasn't it... The long, non-dramatic pauses
between bits of dialog certainly helped the, uh, action, and the
chemistry between the, ah, actors was really, uh... something. (I
especially liked the self-regenerating mountain range that they blew up
twice, by way of demonstrating their peachy-keen new gadget (which, of
course, had to be disabled early in the adventure so it couldn't be
used to get them out of their various fixes in a straightforward
manner); I bet they got big production points for using the same
footage twice.)
Ah, well. (I'll admit I left it on for the duration, but I spent most
of the time designing garden layouts, glancing up now and then to see
if they'd done anything interesting yet.)
Re spoiler-related question in .1 (not that it matters whether this
obvious attempt at a series pilot gets spoiled or not):
It's unclear. See, I'd been positive it was the uncle (or the other guy
who went along - whoever had the ring on), but then the mugwump (good
name!) said stuff about having been trapped there for millenia or
something. Now, I know time drags when you're strapped to a bunch of
tubes and waited on by animated puddles of fake vomit, but ten years to
_millenia_? I dunno.
HOWEVER: in the Deliverance-style shot of the mangled (but oddly
unburnt) fist sticking up from the lava, a glimpse of The Ring was
clearly visible. So. Was that the uncle/other-guy who'd kind of lost
track of time, or was it a demon who'd eaten the uncle/other-guy, or
was it the U/O-G who'd been possessed by a demon? [And why should I
care? ;-)]
My favorite part: where the team leader or somebody blithely freed the
Yeti from one of his two "highest commandments" by simply saying,
"Friendship is more important than any law." Pop TV-psych at its worst;
let's tramp all over the deepest beliefs of other societies, *and*
justify all manner of crimes in the name of friendship, all between
commercial breaks. Yeesh.
-b
|
1134.3 | | TINCUP::XAIPE::KOLBE | Caught between Angst and Ennui | Mon Mar 01 1993 13:13 | 3 |
| The biggest dilemma I'm having is whether this or Space Rangers is worse. Both
of these could kill science fiction on TV. Who WRITES this stuff????? Could
they possibly have thought it was GOOD???? liesl
|
1134.4 | 8-) | KAOFS::M_FETT | alias Mrs.Barney | Mon Mar 01 1993 13:41 | 14 |
| You know, I was much more seriously insulted by the lack of good
dialog in B5 than the absolute absurdness of this movie.
I guess it is because it lived up to my expectations (i.e. NONE).
I thought it was a useless piece of fluff.
But I didn't get to finish watching it - we taped the rest - I find
I am almost eager to see the rest from your descriptions.....
(Gees, you don't suppose people might think this is SF do you.....
THEN I'd start to get upset........;-) )
Monica
|
1134.5 | Had the Same Title, Maybe, But Little Else | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | len, EMA, LKG1-2/W10 | Mon Mar 01 1993 13:53 | 11 |
| What they all said - it was pretty awful. But the worst thing about
it was the audacity to claim it was "based on" Verne's story. "From the
author of '20000 Leagues Under the Sea' and 'Around the World in 80
Days'" (or was it 'Five Weeks in a Balloon'?). Didn't the original
story involve descent on foot?
I also got a sense from the (lack of an) ending that this may have been
intended as (heaven help us) a pilot for a serial.
len.
|
1134.6 | I'm very concerned over a computer that yawns and needs to rest | GAUSS::REITH | Jim 3D::Reith MLO1-2/c37 223-2021 | Mon Mar 01 1993 14:02 | 6 |
| 3...5...10..20 km/sec through magma and then they pop out into the
chamber and the model just smoothly moves along 8^) If they were
going to have that much trouble stopping maybe they should have
cut back on the thrusters at some point? Full thrust launch into a
magma pool? It ain't the fall that kills you, it's the sudden stop!
|
1134.7 | | DSSDEV::RUST | | Mon Mar 01 1993 15:08 | 8 |
| Somebody on the usenet suggested that this thing appeared to have been
written for children [and that his 4-year-old just loved it. ;-) ]. I'd
had that thought myself while watching it, but couldn't correlate it
with its 9 p.m. time slot... Hey, maybe it's the pilot for a
Saturday-morning cartoon series. Just _think_ of the "action figures"
market!
-b
|
1134.8 | The medium is the message. | TROOA::SKEOCH | Wearing my Alpha Performance briefs! | Mon Mar 01 1993 15:49 | 14 |
| > Somebody on the usenet suggested that this thing appeared to have been
> written for children [and that his 4-year-old just loved it. ;-) ].
I'd agree. The network folks _target_ their stuff for certain
sections of the public. After watching five minutes of this
drivel, I knew it wasn't aimed at me. I spent the rest of the
show trying to figure out who it _was_ aimed at :)
What must they think of the Sunday, 9pm viewing public?
Ian S.
|
1134.9 | BAD! BAD! YES ITS BAD! | ACETEK::TIMPSON | From little things big things grow | Tue Mar 02 1993 08:35 | 7 |
| Well I saw about 5 minutes of this poor excuse for a movie and
turnied it off. If I were an NBC executive I would be hanging my
head in shame.
Disgustely
Steve
|
1134.10 | Another waste of celluloid | RAGS::GINGRAS | | Thu Mar 04 1993 16:41 | 17 |
| Two of the most confusing aspects of this incredibly mediocre
program are 1) Sunday night is supposed to be the biggest night
of the week for television and 2) an article I read in the newspaper
a few days before said that the stations were competing for
audience share for the upcoming ratings.
I can't imagine that any intelligent adult actually sat glued to
a chair through the whole thing. After the first two segments I
decided to clean the hamster cage, which turned out to be more
entertaining.
By 10 pm I turned the telly off and curled up with a good
sci fi book. BTW, if I remember right, it was Burrough's explorers in
the 'At the Earth's Core' series that used a machine to tunnel their
way to the center. Those books were written for adolescents, but could
probably be enjoyed by adults. I read them when I was about 16.
_Marty
|
1134.11 | Speaking of kid's programming... | BICYCL::RYER | This note made from 100% recycled bits. | Fri Mar 05 1993 10:20 | 11 |
| �I can't imagine that any intelligent adult actually sat glued to
�a chair through the whole thing.
Glued to a chair? Well, I was, sorta. I decided working on some
plastic models would be a good use of my time, but I still kept the
stupid movie on. It's kinda like when you drive by an accident
scene, you are compelled to look. At the end, when that fist came out
of the lava, I expected to hear a gravelly voice say, "I'll get you,
Gadget... next time!"
-Patrick
|
1134.12 | This was a seriously BAD movie! | VMSMKT::KENAH | There are no mistakes in Love... | Mon Mar 08 1993 16:20 | 4 |
| It just occured to me -- the only things that were missing from this show
were the silhouettes of Joel, Tom Servo and Crow, near the bottom right
corner of the screen.
andrew
|
1134.13 | I couldn't do it!!! | KAOFS::M_FETT | alias Mrs.Barney | Thu Mar 18 1993 17:21 | 10 |
| Well, after mentioning that we'd sit down and see this seriously
(or hilariously) bad movie - we popped the tape into the machine
and sat down.
Could NOT sit through it! I have a high pain threshold, but ugh!!
I ran out of the room (*honey, don't we have some dirty diapers or
something to wash?*).
Bad, Bad, toooooo Bad.
Monica
|
1134.14 | not again! | SNO78A::NANCARROW | | Mon Mar 29 1993 18:03 | 8 |
| Excuse me for interrupting but this movie does not sound like
THE JOURNEY TO THE CENTRE OF THE EARTH I have seen with James Mason
and is about at least 25 years old. Don't tell me that the U.S.
networks have again(!) rehashed an old and CLASSIC movie (in my opinion)
and destroyed more good memories from my childhood.
Mike N.
|
1134.15 | It's a shame | ACETEK::TIMPSON | From little things big things grow | Tue Mar 30 1993 09:39 | 5 |
| You are correct. You can say that the American networks have
again bastardized a classic and have insulted the name of Jules
Verne.
Steve
|
1134.16 | | VMSMKT::KENAH | There are no mistakes in Love... | Tue Mar 30 1993 12:47 | 1 |
| Yep, that whizzing sound you hear is M. Verne spinning in his grave!
|