T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1910.1 | | WUMBCK::FOX | | Mon Apr 22 1991 10:17 | 6 |
| Since you said it would be infrequent that you would load up the
bike with camping gear, I'd look into modifying you mountain
bike for the job. Wheels and a bar should do the trick. Take the
rest and get a racing bike.
John
|
1910.2 | What about frame size diffs? | SALEM::SHAW | Vertical Obsession... | Mon Apr 22 1991 10:32 | 6 |
| re:-1
Would the frame size be a problems though? My fit for a road bike is
21" as opposed to 18" for the MTB. How quickly can this transfer be
done, with a longer stem for the road, wouldn't I need extra cable?
Shaw
|
1910.4 | | WUMBCK::FOX | | Mon Apr 22 1991 12:52 | 15 |
| RE .2
I guess it depends. How far would you tour? On a very long tour, you
might not be as comfortable as would be on a bike made specifically
for touring, but that has to be weighed with how often you need this
capability.
As far as cables, etc, you may not need to change anything. There
are bars available that put you in a more stretched out position.
These either clip on, or are used in place of standards mtn bars.
The shifter and brake positions are the same.
If you want to change brake and shifter positions, I've also seen
a cable connector which allows for fast bar swaps. Course now
where talking more components. What it comes down to is how often
you will be doing each type of riding.
John
|
1910.5 | ride as often as I can! | SALEM::SHAW | Vertical Obsession... | Mon Apr 22 1991 13:22 | 11 |
|
I ride my mountain bike, atleast three days a week. On weekends, I
spend quite a few hours riding. I expect to be riding a 4-5 hours
on weekends with the road bike. I find it is always a lot easier
if I had a road bike just to jump on it and go as oposed to racking
the bike up on the car and go in search of trails. The more I think
about it, I would realy prefer to have two bikes ready to go.
I have found that a lot of times, if there is too much preparation
involved just to get ready for a ride, I won't do it as often.
Shaw
|
1910.6 | Recommendation: Miyata 721A | SQUONK::OUELLETTE | Buddy Ouellette | Mon Apr 22 1991 13:59 | 30 |
| Shaw,
I'm also looking for an entry level racing bike which would also hold
up to a few touring rides loaded with some extra gear. Actually, I'm
still fighting with myself here, because I've never done touring before
and I don't really plan on it in the near future, so I've been leaning
towards a pure racer. But, the practical side of me says I'm no Greg
Lemond and don't really plan to be, so get a more comfortable,
versatile bike which can be competetive in a citizens race, but will
also be comfortable enough to tour on in my later years.
A friend of mine was in the same boat as me and ended up buying a
Miyata 721A. Miyata bills this as their hybrid touring/racing bike.
It fits within your price range (I think around $600, maybe a little
less) and he got it at Buchika's on Rt. 28 in Salem, NH.
It has all of the braze-ons for racks and panniers and has a triple
crankset which would come in handy while trying to climb a long hill
while fully loaded. The frame is aluminum and comes equipped with good
Shimano components - SIS, hyperglide, superglide, and SLR brakes.
If you look at it quickly you would say it was a racer.
He decided on racing gearing for the freewheel, knowing that he has the
extra granny-ring in case he gets into trouble. He is very happy with
the bike. I'm going to test ride it this summer if the practical side
of me wins out.
Hope this helps.
-Buddy
|
1910.7 | | WUMBCK::FOX | | Mon Apr 22 1991 15:29 | 9 |
| re .5
I'm not saying don't buy 2 bikes. Rather, determine if you'll be tour
riding moreso than unloaded riding. If you'll be riding with lots of
gear a few times a year, I'd modify the ATB for those occasions, and
just ride a racing/sport bike the rest of the time. I wouldn't buy a
tourer which would only serve it's purpose once in a while, but
wouldn't do the job as well when you want to step on it...
John
|
1910.8 | Touring, absolutely. Try Newburyport | FLUKES::SUTTON | He roams the seas in freedom... | Mon Apr 22 1991 20:15 | 13 |
| I've been a 'tourist' for three years now and can attest to the comfort
and durability of a good quality touring bike. I've got 15,000+ miles
on my Shogun Alpine GT with no complaints (other than the occasional
saddle sore ;->)
If you're near the coast, try New England Outdoor Sports in
Newburyport. They're in the Port Plaza shopping center (the one with
the Shaw's supermarket) just off Route 95. They have a really nice
looking loaded touring bike on display that I've been drooling over for
a while. (mention my name if you go in - it's always good for a laugh.)
/Harry
|
1910.9 | try 'em and see | SHALOT::ELLIS | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Mon Apr 22 1991 20:26 | 26 |
|
Well, for one thing, it's true, you really ought to take some
samples out for a spin, to see what people are talking about.
If you can, try a true touring bike, a crit bike (American style
racing bike), and a road racing bike (European racing bike),
and try the following:
- cornering,
- climbing,
- sprints on the flats.
It's going to be hard to choose between them if you are comparing
them only against your mountain bike and not against each other.
A friend owns a mountain bike (Specialized), touring bike (Cannondale
ST-1000), and at least one racer (a Brian Rourke). He is an
accomplished cyclist on all three (e.g., he did Mt. Mitchell in 5:20).
That's one way to go, I guess.
I have several bikes, all more or less classic road bikes, at
least so far. One year ago, I took one of these classic racing
frames to Japan, moderately loaded (panniers, handlebar pack),
and it performed beautifully. So it can be done.
Good luck!
-john
|
1910.10 | Racing bikes are strong enough | CIMNET::MJOHNSON | Matt Johnson | Tue Apr 23 1991 10:04 | 4 |
| You shouldn't have to worry about whether a racing bike is "strong
enough" for moderate touring. I think my crit bike could haul an
Airstream trailer, if I had the legs to pull it. The main problem
is mounting racks and such, but there are ways around that.
|
1910.11 | Opinions | CUJO::BERNARD | Dave from Cleveland | Tue Apr 23 1991 10:58 | 26 |
|
Traditionally, touring bikes are the station wagons of two-wheelers.
They're kind of long in the frame, which may contribute to flex under
sudden acceleration. They're kind of a specialized breed, and a
dwindling one- not many manufacturers offer true classic touring
bikes anymore.
There's one that I can think of that may fit your needs- a classic
design, yet surprisingly stiff and nimble. The Cannondale ST600 is
in your price range (about $700), and comes with a rear rack and
bar-end twist grips for shifting. Climbs like a dream, yet offers
a stiff ride. Fun around town as a general sport bike without
being loaded down.
Editorial- this is one area where aluminum really shines- in long
frames that remain stiff. Cannondale started out making only touring
bikes, yet now remain one of the few who still do-- and that's a
small part of their business.
If you're interested, see if you can ride one now, and be prepared to
make a decision quickly. They only manufacture them maybe two months
out of the year, and they're quickly gobbled up. I ordered mine in
October, and just picked up my '91, fresh off the assembly line, a
few weeks ago.
Dave
|
1910.12 | i'd suggest a "sport" bike | TFH::DONNELLY | Take my advice- Don't listen to me | Wed Apr 24 1991 00:03 | 16 |
| re .0:
> preformance would I sacrifies with a touring bike. Is there any that
> is sort of in between. My local shop has a Fuji Serota, that has
i am not familiar with the Serota but there are many "in between" and that's
what i would suggest. i believe you will find a "real" touring bike a little
heavy and long for fun, rather fast, rides. on the other hand a racing bike
will be too short and "jumpy" for putting any amount of gear on.
i'm happy with mine as it is light and quick enough for my rides of 25 to 50
miles with two water bottles for gear. i also ride to work with panniers on
the rear and if it was any shorter my feet would hit them!
craig
|
1910.13 | Just Ride Them | ORIENT::HUI | | Wed Apr 24 1991 18:32 | 14 |
| Hi Shaw,
How did the F4 wax work out? I guess it is the change of season and you
are in the hunt for the 2nd Bike. The Myiata 721 is a good choice as
one of the earlier replye mentioned. Another one we sell is the
Bridgestone RB-T. Bothe of these bikes are short wheel base geometry
but comes with the granny and a long cage Rear deraillure for touring.
Just go try out a few and you will know which bike you want to
purchase.
Good Luck
uey
|
1910.14 | Tourer = Cadillac | BOOKS::MULDOON | I'll be right back - Godot | Wed Apr 24 1991 18:33 | 17 |
|
RE: .12
>> i believe you will find a "real" touring bike a little
>>heavy and long for fun, rather fast, rides.
I'll second that. My Miyata 600GT, another true tourer, is
great for the leisurely Sunday (and extended?) rides, but you
can't really go out and "hammer" on it ('course the motor could
use some work). That's why I'm looking for a "go-fast" frame to
hang all my spare components on. Besides, I have some empty space
in the kitchen, next to the Miyata and between the Apollo work-
station and the floor loom. 8^)
Steve
|
1910.15 | Perhaps a SAAB 900 turbo? But NEVER a station wagon! | NCADC1::PEREZ | Just one of the 3 remaining samurai! | Sat Apr 27 1991 23:24 | 24 |
| RE -.1:
> Traditionally, touring bikes are the station wagons of two-wheelers.
HEY!!!!! Unkind! They may not be Porsches, but my ST600 doesn't feel
like a station wagon! Maybe a sport sedan :^)
> in your price range (about $700), and comes with a rear rack and
> bar-end twist grips for shifting. Climbs like a dream, yet offers
Your ST600 is a '91? It came with the bar end shifters? I got a '90
which I like a lot, but it came with the standard shifters... I
thought the only one that had the bar end shifters was the ST1000...
> a stiff ride. Fun around town as a general sport bike without
> being loaded down.
True... Very nice around town - BUT, it is stiff. With my weight, the
bike is ALWAYS loaded, but a lighter person could find it harsh.
BTW: As far as frame length - from my recollection when studying
different bikes - in the 25" frame, the ST600 is 3.5 inches longer than
my TREK 660, or the Miyata 721A. Of this, about 2.25 inches in in the
chainstays.
|
1910.16 | | RUTILE::MACFADYEN | You don't mean what you say | Mon Apr 29 1991 04:59 | 7 |
| Touring bikes have an undeserved reputation for being slow. A good
touring bike, unloaded with, say, 28mm tyres, is only marginally slower
to ride than a racing bike. It *feels* slower because of the more
stable handling, but there's only a few % in it.
Rod
|
1910.17 | | CUJO::BERNARD | Dave from Cleveland | Mon Apr 29 1991 16:37 | 13 |
| re: .15
Yep, mine is a '91. It's the second Cannondale touring bike I've
owned- the first I bought new in '83, an ST500. Much as I loved
the first one, the ST600 seems even more responsive. They do come
with the bar-ends and a rack now, but only in a boring blue.
Last weekend I took it out for a few miles, and then took my mountain
bike over the same paved route. Mountain bikes are great for what
they're made for, but what a difference.
Dave
|
1910.18 | Tourers are not "Tanks"... | MILKWY::CRITCHLOW | | Thu May 16 1991 09:14 | 32 |
|
Re: .16
Boy it has been a looong time since I have contributed to
this file....
I have to agree with the comments about the "undeserved"
reputations of touring bikes.
I have a FUJI Saratoga which is a loaded tourer. It ways in
at 25 pounds. Not a light bike, but it rides very well. I
have no complaints and really don't find it to be slow.
I have to smile a little when I read or hear about the
supposed tank-like qualities of tourers in sales speeches
in stores or mags. etc. In almost the same breath these
same people will give us a similarly heart-felt speech
about the wonders of hybrids.
I may be off base here, but if you want to discuss
tank-like qualities...... :-)
I only say this because I personally doubt that many
Hybrids are actually taken off the pavement.
Ain't Marketing Great?
JC
|