T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1754.1 | If they were using aero seatposts, that would be another matter | CIMNET::MJOHNSON | Matt Johnson, DTN 291-7856 | Thu Oct 04 1990 18:49 | 12 |
| Deore EX doesn't make you go faster. It just breaks less, which
may be enough of a virtue that you might consider buying it.
The only other potential performance difference is that it weighs
a teeny bit less -- that would only matter when you carried the bike.
(Certainly not on downhills!)
So I hate to say it, but it sounds like your problem lies in the
other 80%. Of course, performance is only rarely a reason why
people buy $1000+ bikes....
MATT
|
1754.2 | HOW ARE YOUR TIRES? | AKOV12::FULLER | | Fri Oct 05 1990 12:03 | 6 |
| One area you could investigate is tires, many of the lower prices
mountain bikes do not have equivalent rubber. A few slips in loose
rock up a hill can be a portion of you problem. Go with some ground
control or equal type of tire if you haven't done so already.
steve
|
1754.3 | | CSCOA3::HOOD_DO | | Fri Oct 05 1990 12:17 | 16 |
| I agree with .1.... it's probably the other 80%. Borrow one of those
$1000 bikes some time and see. Deore EX componentry isn't going to make
any difference.... unless you are missing shifts now because your
stuff is worn out. The $1000 bikes may weigh a bit less (3-4lbs max),
but 4lbs is only 2% of 200 lbs .
The biggest weight savings that you could obtain with your bike
would probably be in the wheels (rim/hub/tire/tube), handlebars,
and seatpost..... not in the Deore EX components.
Make sure that the bike fits you properly, so that you are getting
the maximum efficiency for your work. Watch your cadence, watch your
style, put in extra workouts, and (finally) find some way of objectively
measuring your progress (while you have been improving, they may also
have been improving... by equal amounts so as to make you think that
it is the bike). Remember that a pro could probably beat you (and me)
on a Huffy... no matter what bike you have.
|
1754.4 | TIPS | TROA09::SMORRISON | | Sat Oct 06 1990 14:19 | 13 |
| If you have the money to spend on a new bike get a deore XT, but if you
do not have the extra cash, a 400LX bike should last you for a while,
keep an eye on the following things and you should be able to keep up
to your friends: tire pressure, lubricate hubs, freewheels and head
set, make sure that the bike fits you properly; any bike shop will
size you up, please use cycling pants and perhaps some hard sole
cycling shoes. Keep an eye on Bicycling magazine, they usually have
some good tips for fresh riders. Have fun riding and keep an eye for
pot holes .
H.B.
|
1754.5 | hints | CXCAD::EDMONDS | | Thu Dec 27 1990 21:43 | 19 |
|
Some hints on going faster that your freinds won't share with you,
at least the ones who always beat you up the hills. The ideas on tires,and
conditioning, and position are right on. Bicycling has a number
of excelent articles on position for road bikes. It all works for MTbs
also except the part about the drops. So what are you wearing for shoes, your
tennies I bet. Buy some bicycle specific shoes right away,Its like getting
a 1000 dollar frame upgrade for free, well maybe 50 bucks. Second of all
if you replace anything on your bike, let it be the frame. Those low end
specilized bikes are wonderful entry vehicles to see if you like bikes but my
they wear on you after a while. So lets put this in order now, work on you first
, it take about two years of training to develope good bike muscles, then get
decent shoes, it only takes a few min at the store, check those tires, I like
ground control extremesin the rear, and hardpacks in the front. By the way if
you get real serious about riding the decision about what to do with your
bike will be real easy once it just falls to pecies at about 600 miles.
Ray
|
1754.6 | How do they do it? | CUJO::BERNARD | Dave from Cleveland | Fri Dec 28 1990 09:51 | 13 |
|
Ray-
>>Buy some bicycle specific shoes right away,Its like getting
>>a 1000 dollar frame upgrade for free, well maybe 50 bucks.
I confess that I never sprang for bike shoes before, just used
sneakers or stiff-soled old low rises w/toe straps.
Do bike shoes really make such a dramatic difference? How? Or is it
the bike-shoe-and-special-pedal-connection combination?
Dave
|
1754.7 | Bike Shoes +++ | LANDO::OBRIEN | Give it a TRI | Fri Dec 28 1990 10:05 | 16 |
|
>>> Do bike shoes really make such a dramatic difference? How?
Yes. Bike shoes make a HUGE difference; at least on a road bike. I've
never used bike shoes on a mtn bike yet, but there is no doubt that
they make a big difference on my road bike.
How - Well, since the sole of a bike shoe is not flexible, there is
virtually no loss of power on your downstroke due to arch bend. As for
the other parts of the rotation... upstroke, push and pull,... the bike
shoe is secured in a cleat or binding so it won't slip out.
Good luck.
-John
|
1754.8 | why biking shoes | SHALOT::ELLIS | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Fri Dec 28 1990 10:08 | 38 |
|
At the risk of diverging from this note's topic, yes, there
are marked differences when you use bike-oriented shoes.
The differences are both in Comfort and Performance.
Years ago, I switched from running shoes (soft sole) to
soccer (football) shoes (hard sole), then later to cleated
bike shoes. Now it's cleated clipless. With each change,
I noticed a big improvement. True biking shoes allowed me
to go all day, day after day, in much more comfort, and
more consistent performance, especially at high speeds or
on prolonged climbs (mountains). Even on tour, I take cleated
bike shoes - that's how much comfort they buy me. (But my
tours tend to be 10-15 hours per day on the road.)
Here's a run-down of the advantages:
- With biking shoes (cleated, cleated/clipless, or touring
shoes) you transmit more energy to the pedal - less is
absorbed (wasted) by the sole cushioning.
- Even a harder-soled street shoe will let the pedals eat
into your feet after a while. Biking shoes (with their
wooden or Lexan/Polycarbonate stiff soles) don't transmit
that "bite".
- Clipless pedalling systems (as countless people have avowed)
eliminate the bite on the metatarsils from toe-straps.
- Cleats keep you positioned on/in the pedal, so your feet don't
slide or slip - lends a more secure feeling, more confidence,
and higher performance.
So there you have it. For mountain biking, touring shoes
or the new ATB clipless systems are both good, even in the
awfullest (muddiest) off-road conditions.
-john
|
1754.9 | :-) | NOVA::FISHER | Rdb/VMS Dinosaur | Fri Dec 28 1990 10:25 | 5 |
| and .8 comes from a guy who doesn't use gloves ...
Hi, John.
ed
|
1754.10 | ;-) Hi, Ed. | SHALOT::ELLIS | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Fri Dec 28 1990 10:42 | 6 |
|
Touch�. But I'm thinking of applying one of those pseudo-tan
products in convincing elipses atop my hands, so that people
will at least *think* I bike (or golf?!).
-john
|
1754.11 | | ALLVAX::JROTH | Saturday alley up to Sunday street | Fri Dec 28 1990 15:07 | 12 |
| Another vote for cleated (or clipless) cycling shoes - they are really
great. I found them more important than cycling shorts (this is from
someone who did his first double century in cutoffs) but I wouldn't
be without either nowadays.
I haven't switched to clipless, but have not had any discomfort
with the cleats & toe straps; I don't think the difference would
be as dramatic as switching to cleats from touring shoes.
I don't use gloves either (except in winter :-)
- Jim
|
1754.12 | MTB shoes vs road shoes | CXCAD::EDMONDS | | Fri Dec 28 1990 23:20 | 47 |
|
Dave, (.6)
Bike shoes are undoubtedly the most important piece of cycling apparel
to make you go fast. As you can tell from the other responses the
road guys figured this out a long time ago. I use the Look system on
my road bikes and just love them, but the original question was about
those silly mountain bikes now wasn't it. There are a number of
different things that you need to look for in a suitable mountain bike
shoe that you don't have to bother with with road shoes.
Remembering the wise old road saying "ride like the wind walk like
a duck" you might already have figured out the first major difference
is that a good off road shoe is a good walking shoe. This means that
the off road shoe actually bends in one direction rather well, and is
rigid when you step down on the pedal. It also means that the shoe should
be comfortable to walk in. A real problem here in Colorado is that the
mountains are big and steeep and sometimes, well almost never, even I have
to get off :-). This means that the shoe needs to have good traction and
that it can't come off your foot. The 90 model shoes from almost everyone
had insufficient heel cups and folks were stepping right out of their
shoes when they walked. The other important thing is that they fit well
in the clips and hold on to the pedal so that you can spin. While you're
at it make sure that you have the right size toe clips on your bike, if
you don't have size ten feet or above they are wrong because every
mountain bike I've ever seen comes with large clips. Pretty tough
to imagine that person who buys that 17 inch frame having size tens
but that's the clip size that will be on there. I am currently using a
pair of Vitorria MTB shoes that other than have neon colors on them are
perfect. They are drilled for cleats, and I use these little metal ones
that were part of the package that the Colorado Cyclist was selling.
You can walk and run in these shoes, and I have considered getting
a second pair and putting my Look cleats on them, just so when I get
off the road bike I don't have to fall down. These really are their
shoes that have had cleated soles put on them. By the way if you were
asking about shoes for a road bike the other notes had good advice on
them. One last item, these touring or MTB shoes wear out. Not like you
think they would however. My last pair went away by the internal webbing
breaking down. There is no visible wear on the soles or on the shoes, but
they aren't as stiff as a pair of old tennis shoes. Caught me by suprise,
I looked all over my bike to find the cracks in the frame that were
making it feel so mushy, but it was just mushy shoes
keep spinnin Ray
|
1754.13 | Head and Toes, and away he goes!! | CSG002::MILLER | Custer had it coming | Wed Jan 02 1991 12:59 | 13 |
| Next to my bike sox and bike handkerchief, I'd say that my bike shoes
are the best $$ I've spent on off-bike purchases.
� �
�
\_/
Actually, I'd give up the shorts, gloves, shirts....everything but the
helmet and the sweat band...before I'd give up the shoes.
No question about it, the feet will admit defeet on any ride before
anything else will.....and the proper shoes will help put that moment
off the longest.
=-=-=-=-=-=-g=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|
1754.14 | Go fofr the shoes, mon | VOGON::REEVE | Life is like a mountain railway | Fri Jan 04 1991 04:07 | 22 |
| re. .6
Hi, Dave,
Here's another vote for cycling shoes. I bought a pair of Avocet 20s about 8 or
9 years ago. About the only problem with them is that they won't wear out. I
keep looking at all the really great new shoes coming out and wishing I could
in good conscience get a pair! They really do make a substantial difference.
At first, I was a little wary of being so firmly ensconced in the pedals, but I
have never yet come across a probelm in getting my foot out, The main thing is
to keep the toe straps fastened to a reasonable degree. I mean, for example,
making sure that they are looser when you're riding in traffic or off-road. Too
bad that the dirt trails don't have warning signs so you could have time to
loosen your toe straps before falling over! However, when blasting along an
open road, good cycling shoes can make a substantial difference to the amount
you can both push and pull the pedals.
I am now at the point where I wear them even if only going a few kilometres!
Cheers,
Tim
|
1754.15 | You could get arrested for that ! | ULTRA::BURGESS | Mad Man across the water | Fri Jan 03 1992 12:55 | 11 |
| re <<< Note 1754.13 by CSG002::MILLER "Custer had it coming" >>>
> -< Head and Toes, and away he goes!! >-
> Actually, I'd give up the shorts, gloves, shirts....everything but the
> helmet and the sweat band...before I'd give up the shoes.
Well, I think you'd look pretty damned silly riding around
like that (-:
R {back again}
|