T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1545.1 | SPECIALIZED SIRRUS | STAR::MCCARTHY | | Wed May 16 1990 14:53 | 4 |
|
SPECIALIZED SIRRUS it's priced right around $600 or less and its about
as much bang for the buck as you can get.
|
1545.2 | Light weight yet stiff and responsive | GSFSWS::JSMITH | Support Bike Helmets for Kids | Wed May 16 1990 16:08 | 22 |
|
Buy as much Cannondale as you can afford. The SR400
is within your limits but the higher priced models come
with Aluminum forks which help take up the vibration x-mitted
from the road, especially in the Criterium 3.0 model. The
neat thing about the entry level model is that it's the same
frame found on the top of the line Dura Ace machine so if and
when your ready you can invest in better components for whatever
type of racing you'd like to do.
As for recreational riding, ask anyone that has climbed a
hill on a steel frame and an aluminum frame which material they
prefer and I'm certain that the resounding majority will opt
for the Al. If, on the other hand you plan on crashing a lot,
that's the one area that steel has an advantage in that the
frame can usually be straightened after a crash by bending. I
don't know about you, but I'm not sure I'd want to keep any
frame that's been straightened after a crash anyway. Good
luck on your quest.
_Jerry
_Jerry
|
1545.3 | Start shopping now | BAGELS::GOTANTAS | | Wed May 16 1990 16:33 | 12 |
| You should be able to find several good bikes in that price range.
Go to some bike shops to look at and try what they have to offer.
Make sure that you get a bike that fits you properly. The dealer
should be willing to make some changes (seat, handlebars/stem, etc.)
so that it does fit you.
I agree with .2 about aluminum frame bikes. I just bought a Trek 1400
and love it. You might want to check out the Trek 1200...it's in your
price range.
Pete
|
1545.4 | Bridgestone RB-1 | IAMOK::WESTER | | Wed May 16 1990 19:35 | 11 |
| All three previous reply's list some great bikes. One more to consider
is the Bridgestone RB-1. It got "best buy" in last years "best of"
list in Bicycle Guide magazine. I have no experience with it, but it
beat out the Specialized according to the authors of the article and is
priced favorably. It's a steel frame bike like the Specialized.
At $600 you should be able to find some good leftover bikes in a store.
You might also consider a good used racing bike. I know I've seen some
good bikes at tempting prices right in this notes file.
Dave
|
1545.5 | check the RB-2 as well... | SHALOT::ELLIS | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Thu May 17 1990 08:25 | 6 |
|
The latest Bicycling Guide also writes up the Bridgestone RB-2,
which it calls a surprising value for money (an RB-1 with some
lesser componentry, I believe). The article's tone was positive.
-j
|
1545.6 | UPDATE 10:00pm 5/17/90 | CURIE::LO | | Thu May 17 1990 10:43 | 12 |
| Update: I went to a couple of dealers around town yeasterday.
Unfortunately, I did not see any of the bike's mentioned
in the previous replies.
Anyway, I saw a 1989 Trek 660 with Shimano Ultegra 600
components for $600, a 1989 Centurion Masters also with
Ultegra 600 components $630, 1989 Centurion Expert with
New SunTour GPX components $550, and a Raleigh Olympus
with New Shimano 105 components for $550.
Question Any comments on these bikes? I will try and see the
Specialized, Cannondale, and Brighton bikes today.
|
1545.7 | Aluminum frame on Trek 660? | BAGELS::GOTANTAS | | Thu May 17 1990 11:46 | 9 |
| Trek does not make a model 660 this year and I don't have last years
catalog so I'm not sure if it's aluminum. The Ultegra 600 components
are very good, but I've heard that they may be discontinued after this
year. Anyways...I'm not trying to discourage you from the Trek or any
others that you mentioned, but you should be able to try 'em before you
buy 'em.
Pete
|
1545.8 | TEST PILOT... | WMOIS::C_GIROUARD | | Thu May 17 1990 12:59 | 15 |
| I agree with all of the inputs. BTW, I own a 3.0 C-Dale and
love it. For that price range you're not going to go wrong.
Leftovers will be the best buy. You can really choose your
own subtlties/nuances for that price to include frame stuff.
Don't worry about discontued components. The 600 Ultegra stuff
will last, and if you turn out to be as serious as you think you'll
get, by that time you'll be sniffing around for things at the next
level. You'll find most of of the bike outfitted with most of the
same components.
As someone said earlier... TEST PILOT the stuff. You'll find what you
want when you hit the road.
Chip
|
1545.9 | not an aluminum frame | LEVERS::GULICK | | Thu May 17 1990 13:04 | 6 |
| re: -.2 (?) the Trek you saw is not an aluminum frame model.
The aluminum frame models are 1000,1100,1200,1400,1420,1500.
The 660 is, I believe, their top end chro-mo frame from last
year. I have an 89 Trek catalog at home if you want more details.
-tom
|
1545.10 | GOOD $600 BIKES | SPWACY::SAVAGED | | Thu May 17 1990 13:36 | 12 |
| I BOUGHT THE SPECIALIZED SIRRUS LAST YEAR AND WOULD RECOMMEND IT
HIGHLY. ONE THING I DID READ RECENTLY ABOUT THIS YEAR'S MODEL IS
THAT IT HAS A LITTLE LESS STIFFER RIDE THAN LAST YEAR'S MODEL.
THE LIST ON THIS BIKE IS $550 BUT I PICKED IT UP FOR $450 DURING
THE FALL.
ANOTHER GOOD BIKE IN THE $600 RANGE IS THE SCHWINN TEMPO. LIKE THE
SPECIALIZED IT ALSO HAS THE SHIMANO 105 GEARS, BRAKES AND HUBS.
DAN
|
1545.11 | Make sure it fits | DISCVR::HUI | | Thu May 17 1990 14:15 | 17 |
| Don't go for the special deals unless the bike fits you correctly. We had
a 6 foot riders with 33 inseam walk in the shop a few weeks ago telling
me what a great deal he got on his expensive 54cm Kestrel. But in
reality, I think he should not have bought the bike because he
should be riding a 56cm or 58cm.
In general, "No deal is a good deal if it doesn't fit". Get fitted
first to determine the size you need and then go searching for your
race bike. Ask to get yourself "Fit Kitted". It will cost about $15
but a good dealer will refund you the money if you purchase the bike
from them.
Good Luck,
Huey
|
1545.12 | UPDATE 1:40 5/17/90 | CURIE::LO | | Thu May 17 1990 14:48 | 19 |
| update: 1:40 5/17/90 update
I am quite surprised by the number of responses that have
been entered since this morning. This is great!!!!
Regarding some of the comments, the 1989 Trek 660 is a
full cro-moly bike. From other notes I have read in this
conference, cro-moly seems better to me than aluminum.
No need to debate cro-moly/aluminum here.
Question Is there a big difference between Tange Prestige Chromoly
(used in the Centurion bikes) and True Temper RC 4130
Chromoly (used int the Trek bikes).
Is there a big difference between last year's Shimano
Ultegra 600 and New 105 sc components?
Action Please keep up the great rate of responses. The way
things are going I might buy a bike this weekend!!!
|
1545.13 | Some answers... | BAGELS::GOTANTAS | | Thu May 17 1990 17:31 | 12 |
| Tange Prestige CrMo is the good stuff. I really don't know about the
True Temper RC 4130, but I suspect that it is also good.
The Shimano Ultegra 600 components are better than the 105 components,
but both are still good. The Trek 1400 has 105 stuff on it...the Trek
1500 has the Ultegra, but it is almost $200 more. (The 1500 frame is
slightly better, also.)
I also suggest that you get "Fit Kitted" if you're gonna get serious
about cycling/racing. Do you have or are you planning to use cleats?
|
1545.14 | works for me! | NCDEL::PEREZ | Just one of the 4 samurai! | Fri May 18 1990 01:12 | 6 |
| I have a Trek 660 frame with my own combination of Ultegra, Dura-Ace,
and a Deore XT triple crank... The frame is indeed Crome-Moly and I
have been very happy with it. It seems strong and light, and handles
my weight and size well...
good luck
|
1545.15 | | DEMON::RUHROH::FREEMAN | It's not my fault! | Fri May 18 1990 13:08 | 12 |
| My $0.02 worth --
When I was looking for a racing bike 2 years ago, the 600-series components
seemed much better than the 105's. I'd say they're worth spending at least
$100 more.
One thing to check for is whether you want a biopace chainwheel. It was
std on the $600 Cilo I bought, but I wish I had asked for a round one!
BTW, I've been very pleased with my Cilo.
Ken
|
1545.16 | It's round chainwheels this year | BAGELS::GOTANTAS | | Fri May 18 1990 14:18 | 7 |
| This years Ultegra and 105 sets have round chainwheels. Last years
105 had biopace chainwheels and I think the Ultegra set did too.
Other than that and the brakes, the sets are pretty much the same
as last years stuff.
Pete
|
1545.17 | Hyperglide also | LEVERS::GULICK | | Fri May 18 1990 17:25 | 13 |
|
re:< Note 1545.16 by BAGELS::GOTANTAS >
<< Other than that and the brakes, the sets are pretty much the same
<< as last years stuff.
Doesn't this year's version of the 105 have the Hyperglide (or
whatever Shimano calls it) freewheel that let you shift under
load ? This was all the news in Bicycling,etc.
Don't recall if the Ultegra has it too.
-tom (owner of a bike with 1989 vintage 105)
|
1545.18 | exit | CURIE::LO | | Mon May 21 1990 16:34 | 30 |
| UPDATE Centurion Master's Ironman bought
Over the weekend, I bought a Centurion Master's Ironman.
In the end, my bicycle decision came down to two bikes,
the Trek 660 and Centurion.
I decided, I wanted Shimano Ultegra 600 components.
Numerous people told me they were noticably better than
the 105 group. When I compared the two, the 600 components
were definetly alot quiter/smoother. Just a note on the
105 group. This years 105 sc group is different than last
years. Hyperglide technology is used in the new 105
dereiller. This is useful when changing gears with high
load at low RPM. For racing, where I rider should keep the
RPM fairly, Hyperglide does not benifit the rider as much.
In addition the brakes on the new 105 are reported to be
stronger.
I could not feel a noticable difference between the biopace
and round gears, so this was not a factor, The Trek had
biopace, the Centurion round.
The geometry of the two bikes is almost the same.
I chose the Centurion because of the ride. The Centuirions
ride was smoother and more responsive.
Thanks for all the input.
Close Note closed
|