T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1509.1 | RAILS | UJEST::POST | | Tue Apr 24 1990 12:31 | 6 |
| Don't rule out the seat rails !!!!!!
I went crazy one year trying to figure that one out.
Eric
|
1509.2 | GREMLINS HARD TO FIND... | WMOIS::C_GIROUARD | | Tue Apr 24 1990 13:22 | 11 |
| I would give a yank on the area all 'way around. If there is a
defect in the brazing, you'll defintely hear it. You should be
able to see crack with the naked eye as well. Check it carefully.
I do agree with the previous noter. Those little sublties can kill
you. I own a C-Dale. I put a Trimble water carrier on my seat this
season. I kept hearing a nois and couln't figure it out (creaking).
After two weeks of being p*ssed I finally figured that it was the
carrier.
Chip
|
1509.3 | Swapped the seat | MSEE::BREAULT | | Tue Apr 24 1990 13:59 | 6 |
|
re: .1
I should have mentioned I swapped the seat with my other bike.
/Brian
|
1509.4 | | VERVE::BUCHANAN | Bat | Tue Apr 24 1990 17:03 | 4 |
| It seems unlikely (although not impossible) that it would be a broken frame.
As stated before it is most likely creaking were two pieces are clamped
together. I suggest that you put a thin layer of grease on and then clamp them
down tight. This type of creaking is very common at the handle bars and stem.
|
1509.5 | | EVTAI1::REMIGEREAU | | Wed Apr 25 1990 07:15 | 7 |
| I own a C-dale (frame series 3.0). I notices as well these "creaking"
noises after few riding hours.
I swaped the seat post, greased all moving parts, tighten all the
srews... and I still have this @*#% noise!
Help also required.
Thanks, Jean-Jacques
|
1509.6 | Called Cannondale | MSEE::BREAULT | | Wed Apr 25 1990 08:53 | 12 |
|
Well, late yesterday I called Cannondale (1-800-BIKE-USA). She
suggested that a swap the seat (which I already had) and if that
didn't work, pull the seat post, flip the bike over and spray a
little light oil down the seat tube. I used Tri-Flow because I
was afraid if any WD-40 made it into the bottom bracket it might
break down the grease. After about a mile the noisy went away. I
rode for about 25 miles and the noise didn't return.
Her immediate response to my question made me feel that they've
come accross this before.
Brian
|
1509.7 | Those sounds can be deceptive sometimes | CESARE::JOHNSON | Matt Johnson, DTN 871-7473 | Thu Apr 26 1990 12:05 | 6 |
| The other day I took my steel bike out for a climb, and noticed
a creaking noise when I was out of the saddle. It sounded like
my frame was broken, though it felt fine. It turns out that two
of the bolts that hold the chainrings onto the cranks were loose.
MATT
|
1509.8 | cables too | VERVE::BUCHANAN | Bat | Thu Apr 26 1990 12:54 | 4 |
| Another place where you can get creaking when you climb or shift is
from the derailleur cables where they bend at the bottom bracket. Some
bikes have plastic pieces which pretty much eliminates the noise but
most bikes just let the metal cables run over the metal of the frame.
|
1509.9 | off the subject, but... | CNTROL::MENTAL | Thickly settled | Thu Apr 26 1990 15:21 | 15 |
|
Well, this is a creaking/clinking problem, so I'll put it here...
I get a clunking noise/feel at the pedal sometimes when cranking
hard... Could this be the crank arm moving a bit on the shaft?
Would tightening it up solve the problem? I don't want to tighten
it up too much, since it's aluminum against steel.
btw, these are Shimano EXAGE400 cranks on a RockHopper
Thanks
/ken
|
1509.10 | my guess | CLYPPR::FISHER | Dictionary is not. | Thu Apr 26 1990 16:09 | 3 |
| .9 sounds like a loose botom bracket.
ed
|
1509.11 | CRANK IT UP... | WMOIS::C_GIROUARD | | Fri Apr 27 1990 07:36 | 4 |
| Don't worry about tightening the crank arm to the spindle. Stand
on it if you want. If it's a decent set-up it'll take it with ease.
Chip
|
1509.12 | | ALLVAX::JROTH | It's a bush recording... | Fri Apr 27 1990 08:04 | 19 |
| � Don't worry about tightening the crank arm to the spindle. Stand
� on it if you want. If it's a decent set-up it'll take it with ease.
This is ill advised, since a good crank does not need to be tightened
by king kong to fit properly. My only experience with loose cranks
was that I had to replace the cranks, because no amount of tightening
would make them stay tight. On the other hand, the Campy SR and
a Dura-Ace crank I have now have never been overtightened and have
never had a hint of coming loose.
There are notes elsewhere in this file about crank arms.
As for rattling and creaking, I've seen had my handlebar stem, seatpost,
frame mounted pump, and a rear mounted rack make noises due to being
loose at one time or another (actually the stem still makes creaking
noise sometimes - it's a Cinelli and they supposedy do that) - at times
it was quite frustrating to try and find the real culprit.
- Jim
|
1509.13 | Cranks must be right | CLYPPR::FISHER | Dictionary is not. | Fri Apr 27 1990 08:59 | 9 |
| If the crank arm is loose it must be tightened, else the stress of
worrying back and forth on the axle will cause it to eventually crack.
If you overtighten it, that will cause it to break, too, someday when
you are at the fartthest point from home on your longest trip of the
year -- or at the valley between two incredible climbs with the only
phones on the top of the mountains.
ed
|
1509.14 | | CNTROL::MENTAL | Thickly settled | Fri Apr 27 1990 09:48 | 14 |
|
RE: last few...
I checked the bottom bracket... that seems to be snug. I suspect
it's the crank arm... I'll tighten it a bit to see if the problem
goes away...
Thanks
/Ken
|
1509.15 | Don't split them. | TALLIS::JBELL | Zeno was almost here | Fri Apr 27 1990 10:29 | 21 |
| Recently in rec.bicycles there was a debate about
tightening cranks.
Jobst Brandt pointed out that all cranks shift around
a little. You can tell this by the way that the paint wears
off the spindle. If you constantly tighten the bolt after
each ride, you eventually split the crank.
The consesus was that the proper way to torque the crank bolts
is to loosen them first, then tighten them properly.
One way to check if it's the cranks making the noise is this:
1. Put the cranks in a horizontal position and stand on both
of them with all your weight.
2. Take your weight off the cranks, and backpedal 180 degrees.
3. Put your weight back onto the cranks while listening for
the creaking.
-Jeff Bell
|
1509.16 | double check the BB | VERVE::BUCHANAN | Bat | Fri Apr 27 1990 12:48 | 12 |
| It also sounds like a loose or worn-out bottom bracket to me. Unfortunately
it's usually not possible to just grab a crank with your hand and see if it's
loose. If it's fairly new then it may just need to be adjusted (this is the
kind of thing that *I* would let a shop do, it only takes then about 2 minutes
and if you bought the bike there they will likely do it free). If it's older
or has had a lot of tough use the spindal or races may be pitted.
My Dura-Ace BB wore out after about 2 1/2 years. At first I thought it was the
freewheel since every once in a while it felt like the chain would slip. And
whenever it did this it would make a "clunk" sound. Felt like if you gently
pedal backwards and then give a quick snap forwards, you feel that sudden jolt
as the ratchet in the freewheel catches.
|
1509.17 | | CNTROL::MENTAL | Thickly settled | Fri Apr 27 1990 12:54 | 15 |
|
Guess I should have mentioned that this is a new bike... Just
over 100 miles on it... (although mostly offroad 8^)
So it's probably not the BB... I'll try out the crank bolts first...
Although I oughta just take it in for its tune-up...
/ken
|
1509.18 | MIGHTY JOE YOUNG? | WMOIS::C_GIROUARD | | Fri Apr 27 1990 12:55 | 11 |
| I think you'll find that most books will give a a torque rating of
180+ lbs. Man, I can't imagine splitting the the thing by cranking
down the bolt. Most of the tools won't allow a million lb. crank
force anyway.
One thing I will say. It IS NOT fun when you're out and a crank
arm falls off. It happened to me in late winter with my MTB. Luckily
I only had 7 miles to pedal home and luckily it was the left one!
And, no matter what, if you have any play it's TOO loose.
Son Of KONG :-)
|
1509.19 | Take it into the shop | CESARE::JOHNSON | Matt Johnson, DTN 871-7473 | Fri Apr 27 1990 14:10 | 6 |
| I wouldn't rule out the BB, even if the bike's new. It could have
been assembled wrong (bearing missing, cups not straight). At any
rate, it sounds like the shop should be willing to help you out,
if you've only put 100 miles on the bike.
MATT
|
1509.20 | Torque | DECWET::BINGHAM | John | Fri Apr 27 1990 15:06 | 3 |
| >.18 180+ ? You mean 180 ft-lbs of torque? For alloy on steel that would
destroy the crank given the leverage of the bolt threads. Check Sutherland's
handbook for recommended torque.
|
1509.21 | BB problems can be REAL serious... | SUSHI::KMACDONALD | Hat floating? It's MUD SEASON! | Fri Apr 27 1990 15:35 | 11 |
| Also note that a loose BB can rapidly (in less than a day of riding) cause
the bottom bracket shell threads to strip, necessitating rethreading in a
different thread gauge, or replacement of the frame. Not a good thing to
do, neglecting your BB!
We had a guy in our shop who ruined a new frame in less than a week by
doing this - he had an INCREDIBLY destructive riding style, as we built
up his second frame paying close attention to the BB area, and he was well
on his way to ruining a second frame in a few more days!
ken
|
1509.22 | INCH LBS. | WMOIS::DRIVETTS | Dave Rivetts, WMO, USCD, 241-4627 | Sat Apr 28 1990 08:41 | 5 |
| RE .18
I think he means 180in lbs of tourque.
Dave
|
1509.23 | Can't ride, might as well overhaul! | NCDEL::PEREZ | Just one of the 4 samurai! | Mon Apr 30 1990 00:54 | 3 |
| Does that equate to 15 ft lbs? I just rebuilt my bottom bracket and
torqued the cranks to 15 ft lbs. I'm just curious whether that is too
little, too much, or just the right tightness.
|
1509.24 | tightening crank arm did it... | CNTROL::MENTAL | Thickly settled | Mon Apr 30 1990 10:02 | 14 |
|
Well, I tried tightening up the crank arm a bit, and that
did the trick. I hope this doesn't happen often or the crank
will bottom out on the spindle from the hole widening out.
Back in BMX days, lots of guys had problems with this. They
always ended up stuffing washers under the bolt to get a little
more life out of the crank arms.
thanks for the help
/ken
|
1509.25 | So thats what winter is for | WAV13::DELORIEA | Time to make the jerseys | Mon Apr 30 1990 12:53 | 11 |
| All this talk about loose bottom brackets and cranks must have put the hex on
me. This past Friday I was starting my 30 mile commute home when I started to
hear a creaking from the BB area. I immediately started worrying about ruinning
my BB or crank. When I got home I took off the chain and spun the cranks. Yep
there was some noise coming from in there. I took it apart and found the
bearings where kind of dry on the fixed cup side of the axle. I guess I should
have repacked it this winter. Preventive maintenance is better than down time.
Tom
|
1509.26 | ELEPHANT FEET... | WMOIS::C_GIROUARD | | Mon Apr 30 1990 13:42 | 3 |
| I did mean tourque, not ft. lbs... Those were elephant feet tons!
Moi
|
1509.27 | Bottom bracket virus has hit me too! | TPWEST::SHROYER | | Mon Apr 30 1990 14:14 | 8 |
| So it must be time for Bottom Bracket checking. I did the same as -.2; spun
my crank and it felt just a little rough. So, I popped the crank off, took
off the lock ring and tried to remove the inner plate (or what ever you call
it). It wouldn't budge. It seams to be frozen in place. I know this should
just spin right off. Help, is there a technique for un-freezing this?
|
1509.28 | got the right tool? | SUSHI::KMACDONALD | Hat floating? It's MUD SEASON! | Mon Apr 30 1990 14:46 | 16 |
| >my crank and it felt just a little rough. So, I popped the crank off, took
>off the lock ring and tried to remove the inner plate (or what ever you call
>it). It wouldn't budge. It seams to be frozen in place. I know this should
>just spin right off. Help, is there a technique for un-freezing this?
FWIW, if you have the 'older' style BB that has a lock ring only on one side,
you should in gneral NOT try to remove the cup on the other side, which is
called a fixed cup for a good reason. Don't fool with it unless it definitely
needs replacement, or if it's definitely coming loose.
As for removing your adjustable cup (w/lockring) - are you using a pin tool?
Turning it the right direction? These are often reluctant to move, but NEVER
saw one that wouldn't come out with a pin tool + appropriate violence (do
be careful not to strip anything....)
ken
|
1509.29 | Some more information on the BB | TPWEST::SHROYER | | Mon Apr 30 1990 15:28 | 21 |
| <<< Note 1509.28 by SUSHI::KMACDONALD "Hat floating? It's MUD SEASON!" >>>
-< got the right tool? >-
>As for removing your adjustable cup (w/lockring) - are you using a pin tool?
>Turning it the right direction? These are often reluctant to move, but NEVER
>saw one that wouldn't come out with a pin tool + appropriate violence (do
>be careful not to strip anything....)
> ken
I'm using a pin tool (the type that looks like a oversized pair of tweezers).
I am turning it ... make that attempting to turn it in a counter clockwise
direction.
I'm not messing around with the fixed cup.
The equipment is Dura Ace...circa 1987.
|
1509.30 | Opps... Did I really do that! | HUSKER::DURLING | Into The Wind! | Mon Apr 30 1990 17:57 | 11 |
| Opps.....
RE: .28:
This may be a dumb question, but I'll ask anyway. Why should
one avoid removing the fixed cup? And if one does such a stupid
thing (I'm not saying I did, but ahhh yea I have a friend who did,
really I do). What kind of damage can you cause, or what kind of
damage should you look for? I removed mine (Rather my friend did)
and put it back together and have not had any problems yet? I hope.
I am running with Ultrega (sp).
|
1509.31 | they can be tough to remove | DUGGAN::HUPPERT | | Mon Apr 30 1990 18:20 | 7 |
| Several years ago I tried removing my fixed cup, and really found it to
be fixed. The largest wrench I had wouldn't make it budge. I know
special tools are sold which makes it easier to remove (I believe the
tool bolts onto the axle, and slips over the fixed cup to create a firm
connection to the fixed cup). Who knows what that amount of force
might do to a bottom bracket.
|
1509.32 | | WLDWST::POLLARD | | Mon Apr 30 1990 22:54 | 3 |
| It is not uncommon for some bike shops to install fixed cups
with loctite. The amount of force would depend on the color and
amount of loctite, I guess.
|
1509.33 | Cannondale 1000 pinging | BTOVT::LADUE | | Tue May 01 1990 09:22 | 9 |
| I have a Cannondale 1000 (the last "Clasic" frame they made) which I
have had for about 3 years. When I realy get cranking on it in a large
gear, I also hear a sort of pinging noise that is syncronized with the
rotation of the crank. I have never associated this noise with the
frame. I have always associated it with the bottom bracket or crank.
It doesn't happen very often, and only when in my 52-12, so I havn't
paid that much attention to it.
Mark Ladue
|
1509.34 | If it ain't broke .... | SUSHI::KMACDONALD | Hat floating? It's MUD SEASON! | Tue May 01 1990 10:26 | 14 |
| > This may be a dumb question, but I'll ask anyway. Why should
> one avoid removing the fixed cup? And if one does such a stupid
It's not really bad, per se, but removing the fixed cup on a regular basis
(say, every year when you re-pack the BB) can tend to wear the BB threads
and eventually cause the F.C. to want to loosen up while U ride. In general,
there's no reason other than replacement that you NEED to remove the FC,
so you shouldn't. You can easily clean and regrease the FC without taking
it out. Also, as noted before, they can be a bear to remove without THE TOOL
mentioned in a prev. note. The FC removal tools that your shop is likely
to have for sale aren't really much use, esp. if you value your knuckles
and the paint on your frame :-). THE TOOL went for about $80 in the early
70's, but, like every else, is probably much less now :-).
ken
|
1509.35 | Question About The Cup | MSEE::BREAULT | | Tue May 01 1990 11:36 | 10 |
|
Since this note has gone from pinging frames to packing bottom
brackets, MY FRIEND has a question. Why does the fixed cup (English)
have a left-hand thread? I would think the clockwise motion of the
right-hand crank would tend to back the cup out under severe
conditions. Also, was it mentioned to the people in the previous
replies that this cup does have a left-hand thread? I must've missed
it.
Brian
|
1509.36 | I think this description is right, I know the effect is | BANZAI::FISHER | Dictionary is not. | Tue May 01 1990 12:17 | 14 |
| re.35: Nope, exactly the opposite. Italian bottom brackets are threaded
clockwise on the fixed cup. What happens if the cup's thread bind ever
loosens is that, though the crank is turning clockwise the axle
which is also turning clockwise causes teh bearings to turn counter
clockwise which exert force to turn the fixed cup in a counter
clockwise direction. The result is a continuous unscrewing effort.
When this happens on the road, the cup loosens so much that even if
you get off and retighten it with your hand it is loose again in a
quarter mile. I have seen this happen twice.
If this happens on an English bb, the cup just stays loose and
the axle is wiggly but there is no continuous unscrewing.
ed
|
1509.37 | HERE'S A NEW TWIST... | WMOIS::C_GIROUARD | | Tue May 22 1990 13:39 | 8 |
| I just went through a weird experience. I thought my BB was making
some noise (I own a C-DALE too). It worried me because the BB was
brand new. Come to find out it was my freewheel making the noise
and it was a new Regina. A few drops of Phil's Tenacious and after
a few miles it disappeared. It was very, very hard to tell where
it was coming from...
Chip
|
1509.38 | it's baaAAaack | CNTROL::MENTAL | NotHellBut U can C ItFromHere | Sun Jun 17 1990 19:06 | 18 |
|
Well, I'm having crank troubles with my RockHopper again. There's
a really LOUD creaking noise when cranking hard... If I stand
on it, then backpedal 180�, it creaks, so I'm positive it's the
crank arm...
I guess I'll take it into the shop where I bought it... it should
be covered since it's only 2 mos. old...
Is the only fix for this thing a new crank arm? I don't want to
end up with another temporary fix...
thanksAlot
/ken
|
1509.39 | more noise on the noise | PCOJCT::SAPOT | | Tue Jul 10 1990 09:05 | 13 |
| Here's my two cents:
My neighbor purchsed his Cannondale M700 in April/90. After a few weeks
of city biking, he started hearing a creaking noise coming from the
rear wheel. He went back to the bike shop to have a tune-up and to fix
the creaking noise. All the mechanics who test rode the bike heard the same
noise coming from the rear wheel area. They worked on the bike and
couldn't find the source of the noise. The bike shop owner called
Cannondale and explained the problem. Cannondale sent down a new frame.
The bike shop replaced the frame and all seemed well.
Last week after a short ride, my neighbor told me the noise had come
back..........
To be continued..........
|
1509.40 | Al creaks as it cracks... | KOOZEE::PAULHUS | Chris @ MLO6B-2/T13 dtn 223-6871 | Tue Jul 10 1990 13:20 | 11 |
| When an aluminum tube breaks from fatigue, it creaks for a while as
the crack opens up and works. My aluminum seat on my recumbent creaked
for months before I got around to looking closely at it and finding
half the tube cracked thru.
I gather that the manufacturers of aluminum tube bikes just assume
that there will be some overstress/early failures and are resigned to
replacing some frames.
I wish someone would do a technical article on aluminum fatigue for
Bicycling magazine [but I bet Cannondale/Trek/etc would howl!] and get
the correct info out on this topic. 'Til then, read a textbook on metal
fatigue. - Chris
|
1509.41 | Back of the Envelope | TALLIS::JBELL | Zeno was almost here | Tue Jul 10 1990 19:18 | 63 |
| Somehow the discussion over alumin(i)um fatigue failure has
gotten split between note 1509 and 900.
I'm pretty sure that they all use the alloy 6061 with a T6
heat treating. It's the same kind as used in blackburn racks.
I'm not sure if there is a good reason for this, or if it's
just because that's what Shawn Buckley used back in the early
1970s, Klien copied him, and then Cannondale copied Klien.
I went to the LTN reading room and found a vol 1 of the
"Metals Handbook". Here's what it has to say about 6061-T6:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Composition: 1% Mg, .6%Si, .25%Cu, .25%Cr
Typical Uses:
Applications where good strength formability, weldability,
and very good restance to corrosion are required. Aircraft
landing mats, pontoon boats, canoes, furniture, vacuum cleaner
tubing, bridge railings, marine applications, welded assemblies,
and transportation equipment are typical.
Tensile Strength 45,000 psi
Yield Strength 40,000 psi
Shear Strength 30,000 psi
Fatigue Strength 14,000 psi (500 million cycles)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I imagine that bicycles fall into the category of
"transportation equipment".
There was a chart that plotted fatigue strength versus
number of cycles. It never completely leveled out, but it
was getting pretty flat by the 10^6 cycles section. After
that it seemed to drop by about 10% for 10 times as many cycles.
Most of the strength loss was in the 10^4 - 10^5 cycle range.
Note that this strength loss, not stiffness loss.
If we figure that one cycle is one pedal stroke, the cadence is 80
and 13 miles per hour, it's (80*60)/13 or about 370 cycles per mile.
If most of the loss happens in the first 10^6 cycles, that works
out to 2,700 miles. 500 million cycles works out to 1.35 million miles.
So... I guess that my conclusion is that if the bike gets past
the first few thousand miles, it should be fine for the rest of
our lifetimes. It will fail eventually, but...
There's no way to tell what the real stresses are on the metal of
your bike. That depends on how scratched the tube got when they
were machining it.
I looked in the Metals Handbook for info on CroMoly steels, but
there wasn't any entry in the index under "Reynolds 531" (:-).
This would be even more compolicated by the fact the lugs are there.
Warning!!! I'm not a Mech E, so don't believe everything.
I look forward to criticism from from those of you who know more.
-Jeff Bell
|
1509.42 | | SHALOT::ELLIS | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Tue Jul 10 1990 22:11 | 4 |
| Thanks for the research and the inferences...
I for one really enjoyed the data in your note.
-j
|
1509.43 | like an old door | CNTROL::MENTAL | mo' money! mo' money! mo' money! | Thu Jul 19 1990 09:58 | 24 |
|
Hi, it's me again...
The cranks on my Specialized RockHopper started creaking LOUD
about 75 miles after I bought it... I took it back once and he
retorqued it and sprayed some WD40 on the spindle... He said
this is a common problem and is caused by moisture getting in
between the spindle and crank arm. But it started creaking 10
miles after he "fixed" it... and the bike didn't get wet...
Is this really a common problem? Anybody have this happen?
None of my friends had this happen. Retorquing the bolt does not
help for more than a few miles... Is there any fix short of
replacing the crank arm?
thanks in advance
/ken
|
1509.44 | BB noise MAY be a frame problem... | NCBOOT::PEREZ | Trust, but ALWAYS verify! | Thu Apr 08 1993 18:08 | 40 |
| Well, since this is the NOISY CANNONDALE FRAME note...
I started getting a creaking synchronized with pedal rotation late last
season on my 3-year-old ST600. This spring I noticed that it was still
there so I loosened, tightened, adjusted, and fiddled with all the
standard things... Still creaked.
Finally, I pulled the BB apart and replaced the axle and bearing set
with new ones. STILL creaked. I tightened the cranks a little more.
STILL CREAKED. I decided I was crazy.
Tuesday I was in a local shop and asked one of the managers about my
noise and what else I should check... Turned out he was a former
Cannondale employee who came back to MPO to start a shop. He took the
bike out and rode about 100 feet. Came back and said:
Bottom bracket creak. Can't be fixed. Take it to your Cannondale
dealer. They'll call Cannondale AND GET YOU A NEW FRAME. Needless to
say I was skeptical of this (to put it MILDLY) but I called Now Sports
and talked to the manager, and described what the bike was doing. He
had me bring in the frame so he could get the serial number and told me
the new frame would be here in about 10 days... He told me it isn't
REALLY the BB, its the seat tube making the noise. Didn't even want to
ride the bike, just listened to my description and said they'd get a
new frame!
I called Cannondale and asked them about this problem. They agreed
that it wasn't the BB, they had a problem with some of the bikes where
the "inner tube of the seat tube is too long and hits the BB housing
causing the creaking noise"...
From the lack of argument, need to go to war over this, and simplicity
with which it was accomplished, I got to figure it was NOT the first
time either the dealer or Cannondale has seen this problem...
WE'LL SEE... I'LL BELIEVE IT WHEN I HAVE THE NEW FRAME IN MY HANDS!
UNTIL THEN I FIGURE SOMETHING COULD EASILY GO WRONG! Although, I did
call be this morning and speak to the shop again. Their only concern
was that the new frame might be turqoise instead of red... I can live
with that!
|
1509.45 | | JURA::PELAZ::MACFADYEN | Remote addressee | Fri Apr 09 1993 05:01 | 5 |
| Do you have to give the old frame back? Doesn't sound like there's anything
really wrong with it after all.
Rod
|
1509.46 | SEATPOST WAS A GOOD BET | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Fri Apr 09 1993 07:17 | 16 |
| I own one, my TT bike (4+yrs now). They're probably right. I had the
same thing. It probably isn't (wasn't) the BB. The thing with aluminum
is that sound travels in the frame. I had a problem with my freewheel
once and it sounded like the BB creaking.
I'm not sure what my problem was, but I finally pulled the seatpost,
stem, cranks, brakes and freewheel. Then re-greased everything (the
seatpost and stem liberally) and... Voila! No more noise.
Of course, it would be impossible to know if a weld had a hair-line
crack (unless you know someone who can "flux" it). Big breaks would be
easily seen with the naked eye.
In any event, good luck with the new frame.
Chipp
|
1509.47 | Could? this be a pattern for customer satisfaction? | NCBOOT::PEREZ | Trust, but ALWAYS verify! | Sun Apr 11 1993 13:37 | 30 |
| re .45:
I'll probably have to turn in the frame. I agree there is PROBABLY
nothing structurally wrong with it, at least no cracks that are
visible. Of course, the noise makes you crazy after a while!!!
I still keep waiting for the phone call from the shop telling me they
were just kidding and I'm screwed - call it paranoia but I just can't
believe companies are this overwhelmingly concerned about their
customers. But, I've never heard a bad thing about Cannondale so
perhaps they are! Actually, if this flies I'll have had 2 experiences
in the past few months that could be a model for how we might treat
customers:
1. The Cannondale situation. Call them, explain problem. They have
shop get serial number and send out a new frame...
2. I bought a Colorado Memory Systems tape drive for my PC. I had a
problem and called them. The phone was answered immediately by a call
screener (no being on hold). I was immediately put through to tech
support (no being on hold and then being told I would have to wait for
a return phone call). They had me try several things and got my
problem fixed. Two weeks later THEY CALLED ME to see if the problem
was satisfactorily solved. I said yes but I was having a different
problem. We talked and they said "We're sending the new version of
software. Try that and it should take care of the problem. If not
please call and let us know." 2 days later the software arrived...
Perhaps there is a lesson or us in these two situations (assuming
C'dale comes through of course!)
|
1509.48 | | NOVA::FISHER | DEC Rdb/Dinosaur | Mon Apr 12 1993 06:05 | 7 |
| Re: Colorado Memory: Yeah, they shipped me a new tape drive, oh
this isn't "IBMPC"?
Re: Cannondale. not so promising, but i was complaining about
a cancelled product.
ed
|
1509.49 | CUSTOMER ORIENTATED... | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Tue Apr 13 1993 12:53 | 10 |
| I had a friend a few years back who lost his C Dale when his house
burned down.
He brought the frame to Gamache's just as "novelty". When the C Dale
sales rep saw it, he told George to let the guy know (my friend) that
he'd give them the trade-in value toward a new frame.
I thought that was pretty nice of him.
Chip
|
1509.50 | A good sign for a broken frame... | PRSSUD::MERCIER | Henri Mercier, EIS Paris | Wed May 05 1993 10:53 | 7 |
| I have got the same noise and after a carefull inspection it
turned out to be a broken frame on the right base just behind the BB.
So watch for a cracked painting around the BB.
By the way my CANNONDALE was a SM 1000 (1990), it just took 8 days
to have the frame replaced free of any charge. Good service.
- Henri -
|
1509.51 | Its here, and its real perty! | NCBOOT::PEREZ | Trust, but ALWAYS verify! | Thu May 06 1993 15:33 | 11 |
| I carefully checked the current frame for cracks and such but don't see
anything - doesn't mean it isn't there when stressed by my weight.
In any case, the new frame is in. I picked it up, polished and waxed
it, and tonight I"ll do the rebuild (probably at the bike shop). It
took longer because I got caught in the production cycle... Cannondale
production was in the middle of some other size or frame (I forget
which they told me) and it took some extra time to get back to building
my size/frame because they had already used all their M700s in my size.
But, its beautiful - although all my red accessories are gonna clash!
|
1509.52 | Well, its fine if you ALWAYS just go straight! | NCBOOT::PEREZ | Trust, but ALWAYS verify! | Wed Jul 28 1993 18:14 | 33 |
| Last weekend on a ride I noticed a definite tendency to NOT want to let
me turn the handlebars. After fiddling with things I decided I'd
managed to brinnel the headset races after only 2 months...
I stopped in at the shop and they agreed that it was badly "indexed".
And, when we loosened the headset 1/16 of a turn there was significant
movement of the fork which the folks at the shop said pointed to the
POSSIBILITY that the top and bottom surfaces of the tube where the
headset resides were not PERFECTLY parallel.
When we pulled off the Tange headset and looked at the bearing races
they were a disaster... BIG dents in both the crown race AND the inner
lower race. In at least one case the dent in the inner race was large
enough that it looked like a crater with the sides pushed up above the
surface of the race. Indexed indeed...
They have the Campy milling tool so just to be on the safe side (since
it was apart anyhow) we milled the tube and there was indeed a SMALL
amount of uneven cutting on the bottom of the tube. We're not talking
about an 1/8 of an inch or anything, but there was enough that the tool
visibly took a little off one side before hitting all the way around...
Then we replaced the Tange with a Shimano Ultegra sealed headset. Much
nicer. Very smooth. Better than the Tange ever was.
Yesterday I talked to one of the other shops where the owner builds
bike up from frames, and also custom builds frames. He said it is
standard procedure to ALWAYS face the headset tube, bottom bracket
faces, and chase the BB threads on every frame he builds up, whether
his or from a mfr. He said frames sometimes come in with very slight
burrs or inaccurately milled surfaces.
Anybody else ever had this experience?
|
1509.53 | | NOVA::FISHER | US Patent 5225833 | Thu Jul 29 1993 07:46 | 4 |
| yep. but on bottom brackets. paint on the face of a bb can keep
them from staying tight.
ed
|
1509.54 | Happy camper - FOR NOW - 'til I break something else! | NCBOOT::PEREZ | Trust, but ALWAYS verify! | Thu Jul 29 1993 10:02 | 6 |
| Well, the bottom bracket faces didn't have any paint on them, but the
surfaces of the tube where the headset goes (what the heck is this tube
called anyway?) did have paint on the surface where the races
bottomed... Looked like the headset area was machined, the frame
painted then the bottom bracket faced and threaded. But, alls well
now! And, the Ultegra headset is smoother than the Tange ever was!
|
1509.55 | | NOVA::FISHER | US Patent 5225833 | Thu Jul 29 1993 11:58 | 10 |
| "head tube"
Frame prep usually includes, milling the head tube, bottom bracket
and cleaning the thread, then cleaning the threads on all of the
braze-ons and eyelets and the deraileur hanger.
Some bikes arrive at the shop partly assembled and it's a rare
mechanic who will disassemble it just to check quality.
ed
|
1509.56 | Oh well, live and learn (cheap THIS time!) | NCBOOT::PEREZ | Trust, but ALWAYS verify! | Fri Jul 30 1993 15:16 | 5 |
| Well, its a little after the fact, but this one's been "prepped" now!
New headset very nice! And, while they had it they went ahead and
pulled the BB and milled/cleaned/chased/fiddled with that too... Don't
think there was a problem there but its nice to have it done...
|
1509.57 | | JURA::PELAZ::MACFADYEN | no message | Tue Aug 10 1993 07:51 | 6 |
| I regard headsets as consumable these days... A new one once a year doesn't
cost too much and it does a lot for the bike's handling, such as allowing
you to ride no hands with no worries.
Rod
|
1509.58 | New balls in the hubs yearly are cheap investment too! | NCBOOT::PEREZ | Trust, but ALWAYS verify! | Tue Aug 10 1993 09:45 | 14 |
| >I regard headsets as consumable these days... A new one once a year
>doesn't cost too much and it does a lot for the bike's handling, such
>as allowing you to ride no hands with no worries.
Yeah, I reckon if the choices are a: carry the bike on the roof and
occasionally have to replace a headset or b: carry the bike on the back
and use it for a rear bumper - I'll replace the headset! I've been
tapped in the rear twice this year - both times my bike was on the
roof. Had it been on the trunk rack either time I'd have had a
pretzel!
The one I pulled out after 2 months though - the surface looks like the
craters of the moon! No more "cheap" headsets! (although the 600
headset in there now was cheaper than the Tange that died in 2 months!
|
1509.59 | Give it some slack... | IDEFIX::CODGER::HEMMINGS | | Tue Aug 10 1993 11:02 | 13 |
| One of the quickest ways to destroy even the best of headsets is to ride with
them too tight. This is a problem for me because I hate to feel any rattling
there when I'm braking, particularly on the rough surfaces we have round
here.
My approach is to set them a bit loose, ride a bit, tighten up a bit more,
until I can feel just a small amount of play, and then put up with it. My
latest is a Campag Athena, which was about 50% more than a Stronglight X12
and looks like lasting twice the time. I adopt a similar procedure with all
the bearings on the velo with the result that the veloes rattle a bit....
Just one more thing, the headset spanners are a good investment, but they are
so long that you easily strip out the threads on the alloy fittings.
|
1509.60 | | NOVA::FISHER | US Patent 5225833 | Tue Aug 10 1993 14:04 | 5 |
| I strongly recommend Stonglight roller bearing headsets. :-)
Has anyone ever used one and had a complaint about it?
ed
|
1509.61 | Should be better - if well engineered | IDEFIX::HEMMINGS | Lanterne Rouge | Wed Aug 11 1993 08:03 | 10 |
| The X12 mentioned in .59 is taper rollers, but it's a bit of a cowboy thing
with the rollers in a cage and harder metal cones over the alloy parts. Mine
worked OK, but it wasn't very waterproof and it all went mouldy inside - I am
told the Shimano is better from this point of view but I didn't have a yen for
that so I bought the Athena, which looks fine.
PS I worked in a bearing factory and I know that rollers and taper rollers
need to be made and fitted with more care than the standard cup-and-cone. I'm
sure that a proper engineered and manufactured roller headset would last for
ever, but where's the fun in that for a component maker?
|