T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1468.1 | What type of lenses?? | IDEFIX::HEMMINGS | Lanterne Rouge | Fri Mar 30 1990 03:15 | 17 |
| I had the same problem when I wore hard lenses and in fact had to stop
wearing them for many years because they dried out all the time and
irritated my eyes (even off the bike). I was the only person in our
club that liked the rain because I could see properly for once and they
didn't dry out.
About 10 years ago I found that they could accomodate my poor sight
(about -8, and a lot of astigmatism) in special soft ones. These are
great but you have to spend a lot of cash initially and for the
solutions, and then face up to the fact that they last 2-3 years
maximum. I do wear wrap-around sunglasses most of the time down here -
1. Because it's sunny,
2. Because it's dusty,
3. Because it helps me pose along the Promenade des Anglais. (It's
cheaper than buying a Porsche).
|
1468.2 | | WMOIS::N_FLYE | | Fri Mar 30 1990 06:17 | 8 |
|
I have contacts and found that the Oakley Eyeshades were the best.
I tried alot of shades before I found these.
Norm
|
1468.3 | Factory Pilots doing fine | SHALOT::ELLIS | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Fri Mar 30 1990 08:30 | 16 |
|
I just started using contacts (soft). I'm trying them for biking,
not for any other reason. I'm hoping they will help in fog (not
needing to wear glasses) and during spring pollen (so that I can
wear really protective eyewear that shields out wind=dust).
I, too, am using the Oakley Eyeshades (Factory Pilots), and am
very satisfied with these glasses. They've given good protection
on some quite breezy days - and it has been pollen season here for
a few weeks. The contacts do fine, even all day on the road, this way.
(They don't do so well right now, in a dry office building, looking
at a 60Hz 19" VDU, though.)
I'd appreciate knowing other people's experience... contacts really
are a lot of trouble! -j
|
1468.4 | Give up | MONSTA::COLLINS | WWII bomber found on the moon. | Fri Mar 30 1990 09:12 | 7 |
| I tried wearing hard contact lenses while cycling and it was hopeless even with
shades. My solution was to give up and get a pair of specs made up. There was a
small problem with that however, I hadn't worn specs for about four years and
they distorted my vision so much that they nearly caused me to crash into the
kerb. Be warned.
Mike Collins
|
1468.5 | works for me | IAMOK::WESTER | | Fri Mar 30 1990 09:47 | 15 |
| I've been using soft contacts for just about a year now, and they're
great! In wondering if you'll like them it all depends on how easily your
eyes dry out. I was concerned about that possibility, but there's been no
problem for me.
I can get by with just about any sunglasses and love the freedom the
contacts give me. I've never heard anyone say anything good about hard
contacts, definitely more trouble than soft. It takes a little while
to get used to putting them in, but that's the only inconvenience.
It's a fair sum of money to get started ($100 plus kit) but, speaking
for me, outdoor activities are much more enjoyable with contacts
instead of glasses.
Dave
|
1468.6 | Hard lenses all the way | SUBWAY::SCHULMAN | | Fri Mar 30 1990 11:06 | 25 |
| I've been wearing hard lenses for 8 years and I think there great. For
a while I was wearing shades when cycling but I didn't like getting
racoon eyes from no sun where the shades are.
When I was a new wearer of hard lenses my eyes were more sensitive,
it was a problem for me riding a bike. The dirt was my biigest
problem. That when I started wearing sun glasses. I thought though,
whey where contacts and sun glasses, the reason for contact was so that
I didn't have to wear glasses. I took them off, and now I'm use to not
wearing anything (humor). Actually I wear contact only. One of the
benefits of hard lenses is that if dirt gets behind one, or they dry
out, you can just wet them down with water from your water bottle. If
your more sensitive bring a small supply of wetting solution. Down
hills probably would help with drying lenses or dirt, my eyes tear.
I also tried wearing perscription sun glasses. I didn't like that at
all. Sweat gets on them, they slide down your nose, and I can see
better with contacts.
Short story, don't be affraid to stop and fix the problem. By the way
don't rub your eyes when wearing hard lenses, very dangerous.
Hope that helps.
|
1468.7 | Happy with Rigid lenses and Bolle shades | DUGGAN::HUPPERT | | Fri Mar 30 1990 12:55 | 9 |
| I also wear rigid (gas permeable) contacts, and haven't had any real
problems while cycling. I do wear Bolle cycling shades with them, and
haven't had any trouble with dirt, or dryness although my eyes water
while going downhill. I had soft contacts in the past, and will never
go back. Rigid lenses are easier to put in & take out, easier to care for,
lower overall cost of ownership, offer sharper vision, and are more
durable--- for me. Their downside is the 2-4 week adaption period.
/Larry
|
1468.8 | let us know what you decide to get ..... | FRAGLE::MCCLURE | | Fri Mar 30 1990 16:19 | 19 |
|
Let us know what you end of getting and how well they work .....
I've had soft contacts for the past seven years and am just taking up
biking and really can't go without contacts. If I did, the result would
be bottle cap size glasses that are least a centimeter wide and a really
sore nose! Maybe biking will be different, but from other sports (swimming,
skiing, horsebacking riding, etc.) I've learned to put up with just about
anything getting blown into them or having them drying out and I haven't
lost a pair yet due to a sporting activity (just up grades in prescription
sizes). I'm to lazy to carry around a bottle of solution so I just
wipe 'em off with the closest watery solution that is around.
I'm going to see if my regular bolle sunglasses will do the trick for
biking, but if you find out about a particular pair of shades that work
well, I'd be interested in knowing in case my old remedies don't work
for biking ...... thanks, anne
|
1468.9 | UV and dust... | SHALOT::ELLIS | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Fri Mar 30 1990 17:04 | 17 |
|
When selecting Oakleys, I of course looked at the other models,
including the Mangos or Mombos or whatever they're called.
A cyclist working at the store said only the Factory Pilots did
it for him, because of his contacts.
The Boll� glasses I've seen seem to be close-fitting enough to do
a good job.
-john
PS: One reason I wear sunglasses - despite the raccoon look (when you
have a biker tan, do raccoon eyes make much difference?) - is for
the UV protection. I bike enough, and in harsh enough light (it's
hard to avoid mid-day when you're doing an all-day ride) that UV
protection becomes important, for long term health of the eyes,
and just to decrease eye-strain, headaches, etc.
|
1468.10 | | DISCVR::HUI | | Fri Mar 30 1990 17:26 | 21 |
| I usually wear either the Oakley Eyeshades or the Blades. They both
have surfficent wrap arount but the Eyeshade does have a form band to
keep the sweat away from you eyes.
There is also a new pair of sunglass called the Sportshield which is
shown on Pg 58 of the March 90 issue of Bicycling Mag. the sunglasses
will fit right over your glasses. I don't know how comfortable they are
but they got a pretty good write in the magazine.
The sunglasses are made by:
Sports Optic International, Inc.
6191 Cornerstone Ct. E.
No 101
San Diego, CA 92121
800-45OPTIC
Good Luck,
Dave
|
1468.11 | | STARCH::WHALEN | Personal Choice is more important than Political Correctness | Fri Mar 30 1990 22:22 | 6 |
| I wear soft lenses and find that a pair of wrap-around sport glasses
(Scott in my case) keeps enough of the wind and dirt out of my eyes.
Yes, they sometimes get covered with sweat, but I find that less of a
problem that what the current weather is causing - fogging.
Rich
|
1468.12 | Oakley wrap-arounds | BOOKS::MULDOON | I'll be right back - Godot | Sat Mar 31 1990 14:09 | 11 |
|
Add 1 vote for Oakley Eyeshades. After losing one of my
one week old toric lenses ($$$$) while riding, I picked up
the Oakleys and haven't had a problem since. All of the
"non-sport" type sunglasses just didn't block enough of the
wind to be effective.
Steve
BTW, I was wearing sunglasses at the time that I lost
the lens.
|
1468.13 | fog-proof? | SHALOT::ELLIS | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Sun Apr 01 1990 22:03 | 15 |
|
Talk about fog? Today I had a new experience. I rode in
moderately heavy (heavy but not street-drenching) fog with
the Oakleys - and they fended off the fog quite well -
occasionally, half of the lens would haze up a little, but
would clear off immediately in the clear patches, or when
I leaned into the fog. Great stuff.
And ... I had the inner satisfaction of knowing that I looked
as cool as possible, even under foggy conditions! ;-)
-john
(Note: by "Factory Pilot" in some preceding note, I mean
the Oakley "Eyeshades" model, of course.)
|
1468.14 | Oakley's cost too much! | LEVERS::LANDRY | | Mon Apr 02 1990 10:26 | 12 |
|
Oakley's are great but they're too overpriced for my budget! I
wear Rudy Project's (see Nashbar) with soft contacts and have
no problems at all. I usually wear a sweat band to keep some of the
sweat from running down the glasses.
By the way, I've read that IR protection is just as important as UV
if you wear contacts. Apparently the IR can heat up the lenses
causing them to dry out faster.
chris
|
1468.15 | IR and the asphalt scourge | SHALOT::ELLIS | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Mon Apr 02 1990 14:32 | 17 |
|
RE: .-1 (IR and lens-warming)
I've wondered about some glasses' claim to shield against infrared.
Yesterday it was only moderately sunny and only moderately warm
(75�-80�) but with the Oakley's sweatguard, it shielded wind so
well that my eyes felt feverish. I think a *little* air circulation
would be nice. I wonder if mirrored lenses might not help, too
(or the IR-proof ones?).
Anyone have experience to offer?
-john
PS: The contacts plus Eyeshades did fine, however, in the pollen
and wind that yesterday offered.
|
1468.16 | Get 'em quick | ODIXIE::PENN | Joe's Bait & Sushi Shop | Tue Apr 03 1990 18:38 | 9 |
| I got my new Trashbar catalog in the mail today. Trashbar is having a
close out on Bolle Chronoshield's. $21.90! They come with two
lenses,grey and brown, two temeple sets, and a carry case. The only
color offered is ivory (which is also the color of my bike).
If you don't have a catalog yet the Nashbar stock number is YY-ICS
and the phone number is 800-627-4227.
Joe
|
1468.17 | Looking Goooood !!?? | CSC32::M_KOREN | Mark K | Wed Apr 04 1990 19:35 | 15 |
| I've tried wearing soft torric lenses and regular sunglasses while riding and
was unable to comfortably ride. Since then I've changed contacts to rigid
gas permeable lenses. I have not tried riding with these yet, however, since I
have dry eyes I will probably still have a problem. I have problems just
wearing contacts, let alone wearing them while riding.
I did buy a pair of the SPORTSHIELD sunglasses described in a previous reply.
These sunglasses go right over a normal set of glasses. I have not ridden
with them yet, however, they do fit comfortably over my regular glasses. The
only concern I have is that the sides of the frame is solid, I worry that it
may cut down peripheral vision. However, with them on it is hard to judge
just how much peripheral vision is lost.
Mark K.
|
1468.18 | Hi there, Cosmo Fignon....... | IDEFIX::HEMMINGS | Lanterne Rouge | Thu Apr 05 1990 05:44 | 5 |
| What you could do is as suggested earlier - give up the idea of lenses,
you could get some Cosmo Smallpiece (AKA Benny Hill) glasses, die your hair
blonde, get a pony tail and wear overalls on top of your racing kit....
Some people seem to manage that way... :>)
|