T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1194.1 | !!BOTH!! | WFOV11::SISE | | Mon Jun 05 1989 18:21 | 12 |
| GET BOTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:-)
Nashbar has the OLD style LOOK COMP. pedals for $68.00 was $124.00.
The only draw back I see is that the pedals are Black(I like this)
and they are not as lite as the new ones.
As for rims go MA40 I love mine (I am 210lbs) with no problems yet!
Smile be happy, its only money.
John_who_did_23_miles_on_his_MTB_on_the_pavement_:-(_sunday!
|
1194.2 | both's not bad | SHALOT::ELLIS | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Mon Jun 05 1989 21:04 | 15 |
| Ok, you could probably not go wrong getting both. I agree.
As Matt Johnson says, the single biggest performance upgrade
you can make is the wheels (specifically the rims, I'd imagine).
As per .-1, the MA40's are good rims. I'd choose those over the
Campy's. (The Campy hubs are fine, of course.)
Once you get used to the added speed, however, and the ensuing
spate of traffic tickets from zooming on your new rims, you'll notice
a real *comfort* difference with clipless pedals.
So if you have to make a choice, your making it between higher
performance and more comfort (with slightly more performance).
-john
|
1194.3 | radial ... bladed ... | SHALOT::ELLIS | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Mon Jun 05 1989 21:15 | 20 |
| PS: Largely off-the-point anecdote about wheels:
During the BANC 400km qualifier two days ago, one of the contenders
pulled into the 160km checkpoint (the NC Zoo), sporting a radial built
front wheel, bladed spokes (24 or 28, I think), and radial/2-cross
bladed-spoke pattern on the rear wheel. He said, yes they were fine,
and "very responsive."
On down the road, this evoked mild mirth among those just who left
him at the checkpoint, everyone agreeing they wouldn't trust wheels
like that 50 feet from a time trial course, certainly not in a
road race (or brevet, such as this)... and if they were all that
responsive, wouldn't he be up with the front runners?
I know this notes conference has gone over radial, bladed, etc.,
before ... but would you all consider such a wheel for any sort of
road riding? (Honest inquiry.) I presume Nancy is looking for
some sort of compromise between performance and reliability.
-john
|
1194.4 | I'd rather had good reliable wheels than fast and light. | BYCYCL::FISHER | Rdb/VMS Dinosaur | Tue Jun 06 1989 10:06 | 16 |
| The woman who won the RAAM Open East last year had 18 spokes front
and rear. 18 front radial. 18 back: 6 on the left radial, 12 on the
right 2 cross. She weighed perhaps 110-120 lbs. Did the 540 mile
course in, I think, under 40 hours. Yes, it is technically a time
trial but the course was really "road."
Now, would I trust such wheels on a brevet? No, finishing is more
important. This reminds me of the fellow who showed up for a club
TT with a delta bike and a disk wheel, lycra body suit, aero helmet
and 60 lbs of extra adipose tissue. We all waited a while for him to
finish, and he didn't start last either.
Ultimately it's more than equipment. Though it's a lot of fun to have
the latest dweebery.
ed
|
1194.5 | GET BOTH!! | MCIS2::DELORIEA | Common sense isn't | Tue Jun 06 1989 10:48 | 21 |
| >> My original intention
>> was to get Campy Record hubs - I haven't quite decided on rims yet,
>> but again I was thinking Campy.
I went with Dura-Ace cassette hubs. I love the cassette freewheel.
It is so easy to change freewheel cogs, not whole freewheels. Cheaper
also. So if you plan on doing a TT you can make a few cog changes and
make a 13-19. Then on training rides change it to a 13-24, for the
price of two cogs. Also Dura-Ace allows you to go click-click.
>> So, what do you guys think - should I upgrade the wheels? Or, seeing
>> that I have yet to have a wheel problem, should I leave well enough
>> alone and buy myself some clipless pedals instead?
It's good to have two sets of wheels, but I got them after I got LOOK
peddles. If I had to give up my good wheels or my LOOK's. I'd give up
the wheels.
Tom_who_has_a_SHIMANO/CAMPY_bike_and_loves_the_mix
|
1194.6 | disposable hubs? | TALLIS::JBELL | Ceci n'est pas une pipe. | | Tue Jun 06 1989 12:01 | 7 |
| > I went with Dura-Ace cassette hubs. I love the cassette freewheel.
> It is so easy to change freewheel cogs, not whole freewheels.
What good is that. Now you have to toss the whole
hub when the freewheel dies. (It happened to me.)
-Jeff Bell
|
1194.7 | I went MA40 & clipless | CURIE::HUPPERT | | Tue Jun 06 1989 12:23 | 24 |
| On the new bike I specified this year, I went for wheel durability at
the expense of performance. I'd characterize these as training
wheels. I also went for clipless pedals, and like them more and
more each time I'm on the bike. It would be difficult to choose
between the two. I also went for a mix and match on components
and have been happy with the interoperability (Shimano, Mavic,
Stronglight and Campy [seat post bolt only- had to have something
Campy]). The wheels are:
Mavic RD556 hubset (32 front, 36 rear)
Mavic MA40 rims
15ga DT spokes front, 14ga rear; 3X pattern
The hubs use sealed cartridge bearings. I've been told they only
need replacement every 10-15K miles. I was considering the Campy
clincher rim until someone told me that it was designed with a
particular spoke pattern in mind. The standard 3X pattern would
result in crossed spokes over the valve hole. The other factor
was that many people universally spoke highly of the MA40 while
few have had experience with Campy rims.
Whatever you decide, I'm sure you'll enjoy either one or both of
these birthday gifts.
|
1194.8 | and you can only paint them with striped paint, too... | SUSHI::KMACDONALD | Is there life after drywall? | Tue Jun 06 1989 12:40 | 8 |
| > need replacement every 10-15K miles. I was considering the Campy
> clincher rim until someone told me that it was designed with a
> particular spoke pattern in mind. The standard 3X pattern would
> result in crossed spokes over the valve hole. The other factor
Uh, this sounds like some'un was pulling your leg just a weeeee bit....
ken
|
1194.9 | correction on Campy rims | CURIE::HUPPERT | | Tue Jun 06 1989 13:56 | 11 |
| re: -.1
I checked with the place which built my wheels, and I was indeed
inaccurate. The Campy rims are unique in that the spoke holes are offset
both in direction and angle. Their design works *only* with 3X
pattern. In theory, the Campy design should put less stress on
the nipple end of the spoke. What you give up is flexibility if
latter decide to radially spoke or do some asymmetric pattern.
All in all, its not a very big issue.
Sorry for the mistake.
|
1194.10 | go Look! | EUCLID::PAULHUS | Chris @ MLO6B-2/T13 dtn 223-6871 | Tue Jun 06 1989 15:03 | 6 |
| My philosophy: If it ain't broke, don't fix it. The only reason
for an early upgrade of rims is to change from steel (a real safety
problem in wet weather) to aluminum. The Look-type pedals are so
much better an investment that it's no contest. If you want to
play wheel games, spend $30 and get a cover for your rear wheel.
That will make a larger performance difference. - Chris
|
1194.11 | my $0.02 | AQUA::OCONNOR | fifty thousand notes and a blaze of unrelated chords | Tue Jun 06 1989 18:53 | 19 |
| Hi,
How about no answer at all :-)
Light wheels and corresponding high-pressure tires will make a large
difference but they will tend to be more fragile. However, it appears
that you keep a close eye on your wheels. Campy hubs in my experience
are smooth and tough, that is they can live without being re-greased
a lot.
Clipless Pedals, I have had LOOKS on various bikes for a couple
of years now. I found them to do all that was advertised but I
don't reccomend that people go straight from no-cleats to looks
the reason is you folks should suffer like us :-). No, really if
you are used to being able to remove your foot it is easier IMO
to get used to the idea of having to yank harder than it is to twist
rotate, lean etc.
Joe
|
1194.12 | | CESARE::JOHNSON | Me? Opinionated? | Wed Jun 07 1989 09:15 | 4 |
| > As Matt Johnson says, the single biggest performance upgrade
> you can make is the wheels (specifically the rims, I'd imagine).
Yeah, but that guy Matt is always mouthing off. What does he know?
|
1194.13 | I think I'm becoming an equipment dweeb | WITNES::HANNULA | Well, you see, I have this cat....... | Mon Jun 12 1989 10:06 | 39 |
| Well, I spent my weekend at Gamache's as well as pouring over the
Nashbar and Performance catalogues. And I'm even more confused than
ever now!
A couple questions first:
Re .5 Is there a discussion somewhere in here about the cassette
freehubs? All I seem to remember about them is that during the
MS150 2 years ago I was riding in the repair van and it took us
about an hour with 2 pairs of vice grips to get some guys freewheel
off so that we could change a broken spoke.
Re .9 Am I correct in assuming that if I went with Campy rims that
I would be unable to have a radial front wheel?
All in all, I think I'm leaning towards the clipless pedals, but
I'm going to have to read up a little more on them first.
Reasons for going towards the pedals:
My current pedal is always working loose making crunchy noises
I have no problems with my current wheels, and I'm a bit hesitant
to change a good thing
I have an extra set of wheels on my old bike, if for some reason
I ruined my current set
Price - New wheels will cost me in the $300 range, plus an
estimated 7 hours to build. Clipless pedals will cost me in
the $200 range, plus 30 minutes to install.
I need new cycling shoes anyway.
Decisions, decisions, decisions.
-Nancy
|
1194.14 | Its not lonely being a techodweeb! | NAC::KLASMAN | | Mon Jun 12 1989 14:00 | 34 |
| < Note 1194.13 by WITNES::HANNULA "Well, you see, I have this cat......." >
> -< I think I'm becoming an equipment dweeb >-
Join the club!
> Re .5 Is there a discussion somewhere in here about the cassette
> freehubs? All I seem to remember about them is that during the
Don't know, but I want to convert all my wheels to Ultegra freehubs, because
of the ease and low cost of changing gears. I like the idea of the stonger
axle due to bearing placement, but at <140 lbs I've never had axle problems
and doubt that I will. The one disadvantage that I've heard is that if the
freewheel mechanism does break, you probably have to throw out the hub and
re-lace the wheel, a rather expensive, time-consuming fix. But in 20,000m+ of
riding in the last few years, I've never had a FREEWHEEL die on me. Are the
freehubs as reliable? I don't know...
BTW, the newer freewheels with the splined removal tool should never get
stuck or stripped. The old style with the pronged remover does have the
tendency to allow you to screw them up.
> Price - New wheels will cost me in the $300 range, plus an
> estimated 7 hours to build. Clipless pedals will cost me in
> the $200 range, plus 30 minutes to install.
Why so much for both? For about $160 you can get any clincher rim you want
with Ultegra freehubs w/ cassettes from Colorado Cyclist. If you go for LOOK
pedals, any number of mail order places have been advertising the old
competition pedal for about $80. They're fine (I use them). The new LOOK
sport pedal should cost about the same. $80 max for new shoes, and you've
spend $160.
Kevin
|
1194.15 | Go for the pedals | IAMOK::WESTER | | Mon Jun 12 1989 14:14 | 0 |
1194.16 | Cassette hubs | VERVE::BUCHANAN | Bat | Mon Jun 12 1989 14:21 | 15 |
|
Regarding Shimano cassette hubs:
The idea of the cassette hub is to make a stronger hub by better
positioning the bearings. On a normal rear hub the bearings on the
right side must be moved to the left of the freewheel putting move
leverage on the axle. This extra leverage can cause bent and broken
axles. Is this a problem? If you are on the heavy side and/or ride
over rough roads then it sure can be.
An extra advantage is that changing cogs becomes easy. It also weighs
slightly less (although not enough to make any difference). Contrary
to a previous note which called them "throw aways" they are as
serviceable as any other hub/freewheel combination.
|
1194.17 | Unservicable Cassette Hubs | TALLIS::JBELL | Ceci n'est pas une pipe. | | Mon Jun 12 1989 14:53 | 17 |
| > Contrary
> to a previous note which called them "throw aways" they are as
> serviceable as any other hub/freewheel combination.
Perhaps yours is servicable (at least for the next year or two
before Shimano changes it's design again); mine is not.
At Bike Exchange they said that the freewheel was swaged onto
the hub, and I would have to replace the whole hub.
At International Bicycles, they said the same thing, and gave me
an old hub so that I could try to just rebuild the freewheel part.
Maybe not all cassette hubs are equal.
Mine was Shimano 600 EX circa 1982.
-Jeff Bell
|
1194.18 | Pedals and cog-changing | CESARE::JOHNSON | At home he feels like a tourist | Mon Jun 12 1989 16:02 | 15 |
| Nancy,
You seem happy with your wheels. Go with the pedals! (And here
I'm supposed to be the big wheel advocate.... Oh well.) As long
as your current wheels are 1" or 1 1/8", and have a hook-bead rim,
you can take advantage of the recent improvements in clinchers.
One thing about the freehub discussion -- what's this about cogs
being easier to change? I can't think of how they could be easier
than they already are on my Shimano freewheels. Just take two
freewheel tools, wrap the little length of chain around on of the
middle cogs and the smallest one, and twist. Swap out cogs as you
like, tighten the smallest one, and go. Am I missing something?
MATT
|
1194.19 | Why called Cassette? | DELNI::HELMREICH | | Tue Jun 13 1989 10:38 | 26 |
|
I have never found anyone who could tell me why the term "cassette" is used with
this type of hub. Can anyone here do this?
I am used to the typical Suntour screw-on type that uses the tool with two pegs
that drop into recesses on the freewheel for removal. After you remove the
freewheel, I think you can disassemble the individual rings to replace them or
change the gearing. Is this the "non-cassette" type?
It occurs to me that the left side bearing is mounted quite inboard of the axle
end, which could cause axle bending or bearing stress problems. I assume that
the "cassette" type has the bearing closer to the axle end. This must be one
advantage of the cassette type. Is it the only advantage?
Can someone do a two column comparison of cassette / non-cassette? I'd be
very grateful, but I couldn't send any money!
i.e.
Cassette Non-Cassette
Thanks,
Steve
|
1194.20 | Dura-Ace Cassette Hubs | RTSUPP::SCHNARE | CHARLIE SCHNARE | Tue Jun 13 1989 14:09 | 14 |
| I have raced on Dura-Ace cassette hubs for 9 yrs and have had no problems
with them. I weigh between 165-170 lbs and mash these wheels when I race.
Rather than spend a lot of money for freewheels. I chose cassette hubs which
allow me the ability to make gear changes with complete freedom. After each
race I would make a note in my training log about what cluster set-up I used
so that next year I could use the same set-up or make any modifications based
on last years notes. I have every gear between 11 and 26 which gives me
complete flexibility. If I'm racing a new course I'll drive the course and
determine what I want for gearing. If its a hill climb I can set up my cluster
with 23,22,21,20,19,18. Seldom will you be able to buy a freewheel in this
configuration. I would go with cassette hubs.
/Charlie
|
1194.21 | | WITNES::HANNULA | Well, you see, I have this cat....... | Wed Jun 14 1989 09:26 | 36 |
| Re .14
<> Price - New wheels will cost me in the $300 range, plus an
<> estimated 7 hours to build. Clipless pedals will cost me in
<> the $200 range, plus 30 minutes to install.
<Why so much for both? For about $160 you can get any clincher rim you want
<with Ultegra freehubs w/ cassettes from Colorado Cyclist. If you go for LOOK
<pedals, any number of mail order places have been advertising the old
<competition pedal for about $80. They're fine (I use them). The new LOOK
<sport pedal should cost about the same. $80 max for new shoes, and you've
<spend $160.
Why so much? Quoting Peformance Prices:
WHEELS:
Campy C-Record Hubset $129.95
Campy Omega Rims 74.95
Avocet 20K Tires
3 @ 18.95/ea 56.85
Spokes, pkg of 37
2 @ 10.95 21.90
Alloy nipples, box of 75 6.95
TOTAL $290.60
plus tubes, rim tape, etc. - estimate $25
PEDALS:
Shimano PD-6401 $119.95
plus shoes - estimate $80
I guess I just like to spend money!
-Nancy
|
1194.22 | de gustibus non disputandum | SHALOT::ELLIS | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Wed Jun 14 1989 11:10 | 14 |
| Yes, well, that about sums it up. You clearly have certain
goals (such as using Campy components) for the wheels, which
entail big prices. Try pricing the MA40 rims + Campy Record hubs.
> Campy C-Record Hubset $129.95
> Campy Omega Rims 74.95
> plus tubes, rim tape, etc. - estimate $25
Are you sure? How many tubes? Don't you have tubes already?
> I guess I just like to spend money!
Hmmm... you said it, I didn't! :-)
|
1194.23 | Or, you could just buy a set of carbon tri-spokes... | CESARE::JOHNSON | At home he feels like a tourist | Wed Jun 14 1989 11:18 | 12 |
| You're going for some fairly exotic stuff. At over $10.00 a set
for the spokes, I assume you're talking about bladed. The Omegas
are a sleek aero rim. The C-Record hubs are the second-most
expensive you can buy. (If you really want to spend money, try
the Mavic freehub -- about $225!) There are definitely CHEAPER
ways to go, like Nashbar's deal on complete wheels with C-record
hubs and MA40 rims for about the same price as Performance was
quoting the hubs alone.
Those chromium aero rims sure are fine-lookin', though....
MATT
|
1194.24 | | WITNES::HANNULA | Well, you see, I have this cat....... | Wed Jun 14 1989 13:15 | 12 |
| Re .23
>You're going for some fairly exotic stuff. At over $10.00 a set
>for the spokes, I assume you're talking about bladed. The Omegas
Nope. Oval spokes. The bladed are $22.95 a set.
I'm still leaning towards the pedals though.
-Nancy
|
1194.25 | where's the problem
| MEMORY::GOODWIN | in a spasm of lucidity... | Wed Jun 14 1989 13:48 | 10 |
|
RE: .24
I don't see where the problem is. Why don't you just get both the
wheels and the pedals. You're going to do it sooner or later. So
Just Do It.
Paul
|
1194.26 | another vote for both | ASIC::NBLIAMPTIS | multiprocessing as a way of life | Wed Jun 14 1989 14:07 | 17 |
| Colorado Cyclist has C-Record hubs with Omega Hardox Aero's
for $198, and charges an additional $27 for DT Stainless Bladed
Spokes for a total of $225. Avocet K-20 tires cost $18.95 (including
tubes). Since they mount them, I assume the rim tape is free.
Although I'm sure the Ultegra pedals are nicer, Bike Nashbar has
last years Look Comp pedals for ~$68.
If you've been really good this year, I say you 'wheel & deal'
and get yourself _both_ presents. (although if I had to choose I'd
definitely take the pedals and maybe a rear wheel cover)
Let us know which present(s) you decide on.
Good luck,
Nick B...
|
1194.27 | Record hub wheels @129.XX | CIMAMT::CHINNASWAMY | The Mindless Cannibal | Thu Jun 15 1989 09:05 | 9 |
| I went to Nashbar and checked out the wheels for 129.XX. These are
NOT C-Record hubs. They are the older Record hubs. I don't know
how much a difference it makers in performance but the hubs definately
don't look as polished and clean as the C-Record.
Just thought I'd let you know.
Mano
|
1194.28 | RECORD HUBS ARE GREAT | AKOV11::FULLER | | Thu Jun 15 1989 09:44 | 4 |
| Old record hubs are extremely smooth and tough. For performance,
I seriouly doubt record-c will add anything to your performance.
steve
|
1194.29 | | WITNES::HANNULA | Well, you see, I have this cat....... | Mon Jun 26 1989 09:32 | 6 |
| Well, I ordered a nice pair of shoes from George Gamache on Saturday.
As soon as they come in I will be buying the Sampson Clipless pedals.
Wheels will probably turn into a fall/winter project.
-Nancy
|
1194.30 | a hint on Sampson clipless pedals | LEVERS::GULICK | | Mon Jun 26 1989 17:15 | 16 |
| As a new owner of Sampson clipless pedals, be advised that when
you get them it will be impossible to get into them unless you're
Godzilla since the adjustment "spring" is a hard rubber/plastic
rod.
I had to to remove the rod (by removing the little black cover
and the allen bolt underneath) and hacksawing off about 1/8"
and then re-inserting it. This gives a reasonable starting point
as far as insertion/removal force goes and you can keep increasing
it till you get to a point you like by tightening down the allen
bolt. Also tightening the allen bolt stops the pedal from spinning
freely when the cleat is not engaged (which makes it much easier
to step into).
Good luck,
-tom
|
1194.31 | Godzilla | WITNES::HANNULA | At a loss for words | Tue Aug 01 1989 09:02 | 29 |
|
Re .30
> As a new owner of Sampson clipless pedals, be advised that when
> you get them it will be impossible to get into them unless you're
> Godzilla since the adjustment "spring" is a hard rubber/plastic
> rod.
> I had to to remove the rod (by removing the little black cover
> and the allen bolt underneath) and hacksawing off about 1/8"
> and then re-inserting it. This gives a reasonable starting point
> as far as insertion/removal force goes and you can keep increasing
I must be a Godzilla, since I seemed to have no problem getting
in and out of the pedals - that is of course once I finally got
the cleats properly attached to the shoes - the screws weren't long
enough to seat in the holes.
I was real nervous about the tension adjustment on these pedals,
but since I had already asked George Gamache to paint them for me,
I figured I couldn't change my mind. But George mentioned that
he had put in the "new" springs in the pedals - apparently Sampson
now makes a spring that has less tension in it, doing away with
the Godzilla problem people have been experiencing.
Now if I can just remeber how to get out at stop signs. . .
-Nancy
|
1194.32 | | MEMORY::GOODWIN | in a spasm of lucidity... | Tue Aug 01 1989 09:20 | 10 |
|
> Now if I can just remeber how to get out at stop signs. . .
Track Stands
|