T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1145.1 | JUST TWO THING | WMOIS::C_GIROUARD | | Tue May 02 1989 13:28 | 11 |
| There's never a shortage on ads, that's for sure. Man you're really
gonna get a bunch of opinions on this one.
The only pointers I can think of that matter are to make sure they
are 100% UV (protected and are optically correct. Other than that,
the rest is fashion (comfort/ear pieces not withstanding) or name
brand! Let's see Oakley, Scott, Bolle, Gargoyles, UVEX, etc...
Help yourself!
Chip
|
1145.2 | prescription? | CNTROL::GANDARA | | Tue May 02 1989 14:35 | 8 |
|
anybody have any info on prescription riding eyewear?
some races make me ride blind and it tends to take the agressive
edge off.
Rob
|
1145.3 | Try Gargoiles | 32635::JSMITH | I Bike Solo II | Wed May 03 1989 18:41 | 9 |
| If your looking for prescription glasses and don't want to consider
wearing contacts with conventional sun glasses, try Lenscrafters.
I was in the new mall near ZKO in Nashua last week and saw a pair
of heavy duty looking lenses that had a wide strap in place of the
normal ear lobe rods and they looked liked goggles. They are made
for sports like basketball and racket sports but it appears that
you could even do Tie Kwain Do in them without breakage. Could be
great for biking?
Jerry
|
1145.4 | Desperately seeking Eyewear | AQUA::ROST | It's the beat, the beat, the beat | Wed May 31 1989 18:00 | 7 |
|
Possible stupid question....
My wife wants to get a pair of glasses to keep grit out of her eyes.
I assume that cycling glasses will fit under a helmet (V-1 in her
case). Are elastic straps to keep them on your head included or
extra in the usual case (Iam sure there are exceptions either way).
|
1145.5 | | LEVERS::LANDRY | | Sun Jun 04 1989 22:25 | 8 |
|
re -.1
Most glasses are light enough that you have no need for
straps - they stay in place on their own no problem.
chris
|
1145.6 | | WITNES::HANNULA | Well, you see, I have this cat....... | Mon Jun 05 1989 09:25 | 11 |
| RE .4 & .5
I bought a Croakie to wear while biking. I found that when my face
would get sweatty, the glasses would start to slip down my nose.
The Croakie holds them in place.
In addition, when I take a rest break now, I can just hang my glasses
around my neck - no need to try to balance the glasses on my bike
seat.
-Nancy
|
1145.7 | Who's that behind those "insert brand here"? | GOBACK::FOX | | Thu Oct 04 1990 16:17 | 9 |
| I'd like to reactivate this note, since yesterday morning's ride to
work left me teary and bloodshot!
If possible, can we keep it to standard cycling glasses, or (gasp)
regular sunglasses that seem to work well while you happen to be riding.
I'm not into spending gobs, or looking like an alien, just something
that will keep bugs out, and keep wind effect to a minimum.
Thanks,
John
|
1145.8 | protection for prescription wearers? | SCAM::DIAL | | Thu Oct 04 1990 17:56 | 3 |
| In a related vein, I've read that some of the cycling/sports glasses
can be worn over prescription glasses. Has anyone done this? What
brands work? Contacts are not an option.
|
1145.9 | | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Uphill, Into the Wind | Thu Oct 04 1990 18:04 | 19 |
| My clear glasses for riding near dark are "Rudy Project" with some
sort of plastic frame. They work reasonably well, and don't fog
much. I have two problems with them. The first is that the temple
pieces are too tight, and squeeze more than I'd like, and I
haven't figured out how to loosen them. I suspect they're tight
intentionally so they don't fall off. The other problem is that
it's hard to clean them (compared to glass) with the front of my
jersey.
My day glasses are aviator frames with "PhotoGrey" (sp?) lenses,
which I bought at an optometrists. I use vuarnet side pieces to
keep the wind out and a vuarnet strap to hold them on, which
doubles to hang them around my neck. These have worked quite well.
They're a little heavier than I'd like, and fog a little more
easily than the "Rudy Project" ones, but I prefer them because
they're easier to clean, and they protect me from the wind a
little better.
--David
|
1145.10 | Eyeglasses do for me... | HANNAH::PORCHER | Tom, Terminals Firmware/Software | Thu Oct 04 1990 18:26 | 28 |
| I've always worn eyeglasses, so I've never sought out any special
cycling eyewear. I've worn aviator-style glasses and they seem
to do fine for bugs, wind, etc.
But until last year, I had been using PhotoGrey lenses-- which
are great, because you only need one pair of glasses. At the
advice of my eye doctor, I decided not to buy another set of
PhotoGreys because I do spend so much time on the road (on my bike,
of course). That's because PhotoGrey can only be applied to
*glass* lenses, and even the best glass can shatter when struck
with a projectile. I now have two sets of glasses, pretty much
identical, but both with poycarbonate lenses. I feel a lot better
knowing my sight isn't in danger.
I've found that unfortunately plastic/polycarbonate lenses do not
work well in the rain, especially at night. Glass seems to let
the water `sheet' on the lens without seriously degrading the
visibilty. These polycarbonate lenses are awful in the rain.
Anybody know how to make this better????
Another item: I'd been using cable temples (the kind that wrap around
your ear) on my glasses for years, but I decided to get "ordinary"
temples this time since the polycarbonate lenses are so much lighter
than glass lenses. Well, I'll go back to the cable temples. I
really don't like having to push my glasses back up my nose when
I'm riding. Fellow eyeglass wearers may want to consider cable temples
if you use your eyeglasses while cycling!
--tom
|
1145.11 | straps | SHALOT::ELLIS | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Thu Oct 04 1990 18:33 | 14 |
|
The cable temples sound nice ... Suspension Eyewear is that type,
I believe - these were being offered to RAAM and UMCA guys.
There are also many, many varieties of eyeglass straps (that
tighten around your head; not the kind that just allow your
glasses to hang around your neck). Ok, too obvious, but that's
what I use. The brand I like best is the one made in a small
town in Utah, out of cotton for a strap with a wooden tightener,
and surgical tubing inside the cotton ends to hold onto the glasses.
They're offered in Performance or Nashbar. Of course the end of
the cotton strap does look like a strange ponytail, but it's worth it.
-john
|
1145.12 | I liked my Oakleys the best | SVCRUS::CRANE | | Fri Oct 05 1990 09:57 | 12 |
|
The best sunglasses I've had were a pair of Oakly Factory Pilots.
I like them a little better than the Bolle Edges that I know use.
I would still have them but they were stolen out of my car. I don't
mind spending 60-70 dollars on a pair of shades because I will keep
them for 7-10 years as long as I remember to use the neck cord and
they don't get stolen. I also use them when I ski and for everyday
driving. I get a lot of use out of a pair of sunglasses. I prefer
Gray lenses for everything but skiing, for that I like Brown.
John C.
|
1145.13 | CHUMS (tm) | BOOKS::MULDOON | I'll be right back - Godot | Fri Oct 05 1990 10:03 | 17 |
|
RE: .11
I've got one/pair/set(?) of the type that John mentions
but I can't for the life of me remember what they're called.
There's another brand made of a strip of neoprene with
each end sewed into a tube that works pretty well also. One
or the other of these is called CHUMS (tm) but I don't recall
which is which.
Steve
BTW, What's wrong with a ponytail? (and I'm not even in
software) 8^)
|
1145.14 | Chums | SHALOT::ELLIS | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Fri Oct 05 1990 10:32 | 6 |
|
From the Software side... :-)
Right. The one I described (cotton) is called CHUMS.
-john
|
1145.15 | PLASTIC IS EXPENSIVE??? | WMOIS::C_GIROUARD | | Fri Oct 05 1990 21:00 | 10 |
| I'll throw another vote in for the Factory Pilots. I've had mine
for two years, I had a pair of Blades (still do), but wear them
once in a blue moon. I've got a pair of Gargoyles (amber lenses).
I only bought them because the store was getiing rid of them
($25.00) so I jumped. I use them for shooting mostly.
I did get amber lenses for my Factory Pilots and use them for those
hazy days now...
Chip
|
1145.16 | | HPSTEK::RGOOD | | Sun Oct 07 1990 09:27 | 5 |
|
What do Factory Pilots look like? The ones from Oakley with that
name look like motocross or ski goggles. Are these the ones?
Roger
|
1145.17 | ah, cool | SHALOT::ELLIS | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Mon Oct 08 1990 09:06 | 4 |
|
RE: .-1
Picture Lloyd Bridges in "Airplane" ...
|
1145.18 | FULL FRAMED MODEL | WMOIS::C_GIROUARD | | Mon Oct 08 1990 09:39 | 5 |
| The Factory Pilots are the full framed models...
Regards,
Chip
|
1145.19 | "Guess I picked the wrong week to give up amphetamines|" | GOBACK::FOX | | Mon Oct 08 1990 10:03 | 3 |
|
> Picture Lloyd Bridges in "Airplane" ...
You mean you have to wear more than one pair? :-)
|
1145.20 | A little bit of plastic | EICMFG::BINGER | | Tue Oct 09 1990 11:07 | 13 |
| My response to cycling glasses is...
Velcro (male) strip on the front of the helmet...
Velcro (Female) strio on a sheet of plstic. The thing they make model
airplane windscreen out of.
Upwards when not in use,,
Trim to the desired shape for the lower half of the face.. too long and
it fogs, too short and it is ineffective.
It does not carry the brandname porche, but it is effective.. Normal
specs can be worn below. Or sun glasses.
Rgds,
Stephen
|
1145.21 | contacts in the fog | SHALOT::ELLIS | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Wed Oct 17 1990 20:28 | 17 |
|
Note: Last Sunday it started out foggy (only for the first 4 hours :-)),
so I whipped out my soft contact lenses (which is a big reason I had
bought them last spring), and they did just great for those 60 miles,
some dark, some daylight. It is the first time I have enjoyed biking
through the fog since... maybe ever?
No problem with particulate matter in the eyes, and I could go as fast
as I pleased (subject to muscular limitations) with peace of mind.
I was going to wear the Oakleys with clear lens, but couldn't find
them in time, so just rode naked, and that worked fine. The water
droplets condensing on eyelashes was entertaining. :-)
-john
(Is this other people's experience?)
|
1145.22 | Great in the wet... | IDEFIX::HEMMINGS | Lanterne Rouge | Thu Oct 18 1990 05:28 | 2 |
| I find them superb in the wet, in fact probably more comfortable than in the
dry...................
|
1145.23 | Practice safe cycling; always wear protection! | BOOKS::MULDOON | I'll be right back - Godot | Thu Oct 18 1990 10:55 | 15 |
|
re: .21
Be careful riding bareback John. I lost one of my
extended-wear torics ($250/pr) last year while I was
wearing a pair of cheap sunglasses for wind protection.
It started to feel a little dry, I blinked twice and it
was 'Gone With the Wind'. Damn thing was only two weeks
old too.
Steve (who hasn't ridden
in two weeks, and
now has to go to
Colorado for a week)
8^(
|
1145.24 | keep the shades | SHALOT::ELLIS | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Thu Oct 18 1990 11:22 | 9 |
|
Steve,
Yes, that's why I bought the Oakleys - for wind protection.
Too bad about your contact lens. I will be careful.
Meanwhile, if you're going to Colorado, can't you take your bike?
-john
|
1145.25 | Whadda ya mean I can't take my bike on the chairlift? | BOOKS::MULDOON | I'll be right back - Godot | Fri Oct 19 1990 11:20 | 8 |
|
John,
I just got off the phone with them - they said to bring
my skiis. But that's ok too! 8^) Now if I can only find
the time...
Steve
|