T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
986.1 | | CSCMA::J_BUSH | | Fri Feb 03 1989 13:09 | 13 |
| I bought a Chorus seat post to go with my Dura-Ace group because
the Chorus was 1) cheaper than the Dura-Ace 2) much better looking
than the Dura-Ace 3) I didn't think a seat post was something I
wanted to spend time researching and 4) I had to have something
from Campy on my bike. I also thought that, except for the length,
it was nearly identical to the C-Record. Are you sure it's a Chorus
seat post that you got with your gruppo?
Otherwise I'd consider strength and weight (what else, right?) and
make sure it's long enough. You don't want a seat post at it's maximum
height splitting your seat tube!
Jonathan
|
986.2 | MORE DATA | WMOIS::C_GIROUARD | | Fri Feb 03 1989 13:48 | 10 |
| It'd better be the right one! It looks like an unfinished bar. No
polish, completely round and has Campagnolo stamed in to the side.
The C-RECORD one that was shown to me was polished, eliptical
(aerodynamic) and "real purdee lookin'."
Mine is ugly. I know that the important things are the things you've
mentioned, I like it to be pleasing to the eye and functional.
This stuff is my first Campy purchases. Did I get Croce de Aune
or Athena?
|
986.3 | Maybe a New Record? | ICBB::JSMITH | Bikes Spoke_n Here | Fri Feb 03 1989 13:58 | 5 |
| If its round its probably a New Record. I just bought a New Record
on Sale from Colorado Cyclist and at $28.00 think that its a real
deal but it doesn't have the eliptical shape of the newer Campy
models. It's round with flutes and really shines.
Jerry
|
986.4 | LOOKS LIKE A LOG | WMOIS::C_GIROUARD | | Fri Feb 03 1989 14:01 | 5 |
| Sorry, no flutes or shine. This thing looks archaic. I'd better
ask!
I seriously doubt it's NEW RECORD. I'll bet it was an model that
was left over.
|
986.5 | And Nuovo Record doesn't have flutes either. | NOVA::FISHER | BMB Finisher | Fri Feb 03 1989 14:12 | 11 |
| re: .3.
Round with flutes? Sounds like Super record? Has 1 bolt clamping
the seat rails? 13mm head on the bolt? Actually 12.6mm so that a
half inch wrnech fits snug and a 13mm fits loose? that's Super
Record. Nuovo Record has two hard to get to clamps that hold the
seat rails. that sucker never slips, on the other hand it's so
hard to make an adjustment, I'd rather ride wrong than fix it
too often.
ed
|
986.6 | | CSCMA::J_BUSH | | Fri Feb 03 1989 16:42 | 8 |
| re: .0,.2,.4
That is definitely *not* Chorus! The Chorus is highly polished,
elliptical below the clamp (round at the bottom of course) and has
a single bolt adjustment. Go back and tell the people that sold
it to you that you didn't pay for "leftovers".
Jonathan
|
986.7 | HOW 'BOUT THIS? | WMOIS::C_GIROUARD | | Mon Feb 06 1989 07:02 | 9 |
| Thanks, I did know immediately that there was a distinct difference
between the quality.
I have a CANNONDALE frame that requires a wider post radius than
a normal "tubed" frame. Could it be that the Campy gruppos don't
offer that kind of felxibility in post radius'? I haven't spoken
to them yet, but I don't want to go off half cocked. I'm sure I
paid for what I got. It's just so damned ugly compared to the
rest of the highly polished/anodized components!
|
986.8 | Criteria? | USWAV7::CLELAND | Too cold for pedaling you say? | Mon Feb 06 1989 09:59 | 27 |
| Re .0
Perhaps others have different criteria for their selection,
but for me, I've always preferred Campagnolo, Super Record.
To me, criteria for a preferential seatpost would include:
#1) Weight. My most critical factor.
#2) Durability. How many years before it'll bend/break/corrode?
#3) Appearance. Satiny smooth is preferred to blatant chrome.
#4) Price. Anything over $39.99 is out of the question.
My all-time FAVORITE seatpost was manufactured by WEYLESS.
I purchased a set of hubs & a seat-post from this company,
and they still are the lightest components I've ever owned.
Since Weyless went out of business sometime around 1980 (?)
I've only found one component line that I really like, and
it's always been Super Record. At under $40, this seatpost is
a far better investment than the C-record. Now I'll just duck
behind this steel plate to dodge the incredible counter -
points and ridicule that I know will follow...
Face.
|
986.9 | ON THE CONTRARY! | WMOIS::C_GIROUARD | | Mon Feb 06 1989 12:01 | 9 |
| Hey, all inputs welcome. I agree with all of the points. They're
my pursuits as well. Help me out, though. I've seen the C-RECORD
seat post. What is the difference between C-RECORD AND SUPER RECORD?
And don't tell me about $5.95! (ho, ho, ho)
Thanks,
Chip
|
986.10 | The sky is blue but it's cold and wet out there. | NOVA::FISHER | BMB Finisher | Mon Feb 06 1989 14:54 | 12 |
| The C-Record seatpost has an aero (aka, oval) upper section and
the bolt which holds the clamp for the seat rails has a hole for
a 6mm allen key. There is a campy logo on the polished oval section,
maybe even one on each side.
The super record is polished, fluted, has a script Campagnolo on
the front. The bolt which holds the clamp for the seat rails is
a 13mm hex head though a 1/2" fits better.
No, I do not have a pair of seat posts in front of me.
ed
|
986.11 | | WLDWST::J_POLLARD | | Mon Feb 06 1989 16:14 | 2 |
| The Third Hand catalog notes that in wind tunnel tests, these
oval seatposts did indeed prove to be "aero" - at 60mph and up.
|
986.12 | the seatpost - that extra edge! | ATLAST::ELLIS | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Tue Feb 07 1989 06:23 | 6 |
| RE: .-2 The C-Record seatpost in front of me does look like that.
RE: .-1 The aerodynamic threshold (60mph?) could well prove useful
in staying out from under agressive 18-wheelers?
-j
|
986.13 | 60 MPH - GOTTA HAVE IT! | WMOIS::C_GIROUARD | | Tue Feb 07 1989 06:32 | 11 |
| Gee, I guess I'd better go for the aero design that performs a 60mph.
After all, that's what I normally operate at (when I'm coming down
Mt. Washington) on a recreational ride.
Seriously, thanks to all. However, I asked a question a little way
back. Could the fact that I have a CANNONDALE frame be the reason
I ended up with a "club" instead of the beautiful CHORUS post?
I thought the dealer said it required a larger diameter post.
Chip
|
986.14 | Nuevo Super Record = Super Record? | ICBB::JSMITH | Bikes Spoke_n Here | Tue Feb 07 1989 08:19 | 14 |
| Chip,
The seat post I called a NEW RECORD that has been acurately
described here as a SUPER RECORD (It Says Nuevo Super Record on
the fine crafted *Italian* box...translated *loosley*) fits my
C-Dale which has a 27.2 seat post. All of the Campy post I have
seen advertised come in either 25.0 or 27.2 and the larger version
seems to fit well. As for the previous note on preference of
Super Record over C-Record I'll second that motion. (Until I can afford
the complete C-Record Group that is....who would break up a
combination like that???). Since the C-Dale diameter issue has
been ruled out you better get your post back to the dealer before
he forgets your name.
Jerry
|
986.15 | THANKS - A LOT! | WMOIS::C_GIROUARD | | Tue Feb 07 1989 10:19 | 6 |
|
Thanks so much for the inputs. Will do!
Regards,
Chip
|
986.16 | NO THANKS, I OWN A BRIDGE! | WMOIS::C_GIROUARD | | Tue Feb 07 1989 12:23 | 16 |
| Here's the update: Called 'em this morning. Here's what I got:
What I got is a Nuevo Record post. I was told that they couldn't
get the CHORUS post because of the measurement that I required.
I stated that I was operating from an understanding that they
came in a variety of lengths and that I couldn't understand why
it was a problem. He said you're right, I'll get the order in.
Help me, my head is spinning.
So... I'm 5'6 1/2 (I know it's short) but my legs a long for my
my total height (short body). I know it's short, but it's a
fairly common height (I think) and I don't consider that they
should consider it unique. Am I wrong?
Short, but not microscoipic!
Chip :-)
|
986.17 | Where have all the sizes gone? | SUSHI::KMACDONALD | drywall 'til ya drop! | Tue Feb 07 1989 16:01 | 10 |
| re: back a couple - seat post sizes from the big C...
In the ancient daze, don't know about now with Chorus and Anathema and
all the 'new' Campag stuff, but years ago the Campag (Record? Super
Record?) posts came in lots of diameters and lengths. Something on the
order of from 25.0 - 28.0 in increments of .2 mm. I've had bikes which
required 26.4, 26.8, 27.0, and 27.2 and Campag had 'em all, including
some ex-tra long ones. It'd be too bad if their recent lines only come
in 25.0 and 27.2!
ken
|
986.18 | aero post | USMRM5::MREID | | Wed Feb 08 1989 10:50 | 12 |
| I heard that Campy's reason for aero seatposts is that the aero
design allows more air to flow between your thighs - thereby cooling
the muscles in the area a little bit more - thereby offering a slight
advantage in performance.
OOOOoooo, I know that 2 mm more air between my thighs turns me into
a time trial madman!
Sounds like a wimpy reason to me!
Mark
|
986.19 | that was supposed to be a secret! | BANZAI::FISHER | BMB Finisher | Wed Feb 08 1989 11:29 | 8 |
| I tried to keep that a secret! Using a round seatpost in the
winter to keep warm and an oval one in the summer to keep cool
is one of those small things you just don't tell everyone.
If you do they look at you like you got two heads, just like they
do after you tell them you been ridin' all week.
ed
|
986.20 | arteries for that extra edge!! | ATLAST::ELLIS | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Wed Feb 08 1989 19:15 | 8 |
| RE: .-2 -- the story I heard was similar - not so much muscle cooling,
but rather the major arterial artery [please supply latin name] runs
on the inside of the thigh - and any extra cooling/air-flow for that
artery would be much appreciated by the whole leg.
RE: .-1 -- rats, there goes my competitive advantage!
-john
|
986.21 | ??? | LEVERS::LANDRY | | Wed Feb 08 1989 21:33 | 9 |
| re: -1 and others
Next time you're out riding, look down and see where your
seat post is in relation to your thighs. It's pretty hard
to imagine the shape of the post making any difference in
the amount of air cooling you legs!
chris
|
986.22 | A SHATTERED ILLUSION | WMOIS::C_GIROUARD | | Thu Feb 09 1989 06:22 | 4 |
| Wow, you just destroyed the psychological illusion for me. I may
have to bike naked now.
Chip
|
986.23 | What's another rathole between friends? | TALOS4::JD | JD Doyle | Thu Feb 09 1989 09:51 | 10 |
|
I suppose on cool days you turn it sideways, and it keep your legs
warmer? It's really 2 seatposts in 1! That's why it cost twice
as much as it should.
Oh wait, now I need a aeordynamic tire sock.
;^0
JD
|
986.24 | ad nauseum | CSCMA::J_BUSH | | Thu Feb 09 1989 11:54 | 12 |
|
It must be February for a discussion about a steel tube to generate
this much attention! Besides, aero posts were really made for people
who's thighs were so big that they rubbed against round ones. :^)
If you are still having trouble getting a seat post check out one
manufactured by American. It is very light, polished and comes in
a variety of sizes. When I first saw one it reminded me of a Weyless
post (mentioned earlier). But, it is round so you may notice extra
turbulence at speeds > 60 mph.
Jonathan
|
986.25 | TO AERO OR NOT TO AERO...THAT IS THE QUESTION | AKOV11::FULLER | | Thu Feb 09 1989 12:40 | 6 |
| For those considering this serious purchase. If your ride on a frame
slightly larger than optimum, you may have problems with an aero
post, as the seat binder will be bolting down on the aero portion
causing too much stress on the seat binder.
steve
|
986.26 | THE ANSWER | WMOIS::C_GIROUARD | | Mon Feb 13 1989 12:25 | 8 |
| Hi, it's me again. I went through a great deal of research with
my problem. The answer; .25 is close to mine. The frame on the
CANNONDALE would not allow a secure fit due to the length of the
aero piece on the post. If the aero section were shorter I'd have
no problem. I am going to look around for something a little
different, Unless I polish the thing myself.
Chip
|
986.27 | | CONSLT::MCBRIDE | Idleness, the holiday of fools | Tue Jun 18 1996 15:01 | 11 |
| I am looking to replace the seatpost on my mountain bike. The
original one from GT had a known failure and would not keep decent
tension on the seat, allowing it to tilt back and forth. It was replaced
with an el cheapo one under a warranty program. Is there a big difference
in posts for mountain bikes other than weight? I've been looking at
Moby Posts due to the adjustment lines in etched in but other than that,
I have not been able to justify $79.99 for a post. Any recommendations
on a decent post?
Brian
|