T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2217.1 | | COMICS::FISCHER | Life's a big banana sandwich | Thu Feb 03 1994 13:19 | 10 |
| But maybe the new engine won;t have the cutting out
problem in the current 16v or the problem where water
can get inside the engine and bend it.
Is this still a 2.0 litre or are they fitting the 1.8 16v
on Calibras now? (The one that goes on the 1.8 Astra GSi.
Ian
|
2217.2 | | LEMAN::CHEVAUX | Patrick Chevaux @GEO, DTN 821-4150 | Thu Feb 03 1994 13:56 | 5 |
| .0� than the old engine, no problem. Wrong, the new engine is 136 bhp vs
.0� the 150 Bhp of the old engine and probably uses more petrol even though
I'd think the new engine will need less petrol. My personal guess based
on current manufacturers hot developments ...
|
2217.3 | Is this progress???? | BRUMMY::BRACEY | There ain't no sanity clause | Thu Feb 03 1994 16:23 | 24 |
| I have just had a phone call explaining all.
The ECOTECH engine is 2L 16V and is supposed to be the most
technologically advanced 16v in the world! Ie it meets all EEC regs,
the rest I will leave to your own judgment.
BHP 0-60 30-50 TOP URBAN 56 75
16V
OLD 150 7.5 7.5 137 27.2 48.7 39.2
16V
ECOTECH 136 8.5 7.5 131 26.9 47.1 38.7
NEW
This slight difference will probably make no difference whatsoever
to the driving or the petrol costs so I'll go for it.
But I ask myself is this progress????????
Guy
|
2217.4 | | COMICS::FISCHER | Life's a big banana sandwich | Thu Feb 03 1994 17:37 | 11 |
| > BHP 0-60
> 16V
> OLD 150 7.5
7.5 secs for a 16V Calibra??? Where did you get those figures
from then? A&M, What Car and Top Gear put the figure at 8.1
or 8.3 secs.
Ian
|
2217.5 | Difference is 1 sec | BRUMMY::BRACEY | There ain't no sanity clause | Thu Feb 03 1994 17:49 | 8 |
| It says 7.5 in the Vauxhall glossies, and I actually clocked my Cavalier
GSI at 7.2 secs to a genuine 60 mph.
Anyway the point is the published Vauxhall figure is 1 sec slower
for the new engine.
Guy
|
2217.6 | Backward progress | MILE::JENKINS | Norfolk enchance | Thu Feb 03 1994 20:49 | 12 |
|
Cavaliers are quicker 0-60 than the Calibras. Calibras are much
heavier.
Re : The new 16v
An engine that produces less power and uses more fuel isn't progress.
The 16v 1.8 must be nearly that quick.
Richard.
|
2217.7 | | VANGA::KERRELL | The first word in DECUS is Digital | Fri Feb 04 1994 08:07 | 7 |
| re.6:
> An engine that produces less power and uses more fuel isn't progress.
Maybe you can breathe what comes out of the exhaust?
Dave ;-)
|
2217.8 | Calibra weight myth. | FUTURS::SAXBY | Is it friday yet? | Fri Feb 04 1994 08:51 | 16 |
|
Re .6
I always hear how heavy Calibras are (certainly they FEEL more
substantial than Cavaliers), but here are some figures :
Calibra 8v - Kerb weight 23.5 hundredweight
Cavalier 2 litre Sri - Kerb weight 23.7 hundredweight
Obviously the Calibra is NOT 'much heavier' than a Cavalier, in
reality.
Mark
PS I always found my Calibra to feel quicker than the GSi Cavaliers
I drove.
|
2217.9 | Businessmen not Engineers? | BLKPUD::WILLIAMSH | Flat tank Sunbeam rider | Fri Feb 04 1994 09:06 | 5 |
| It's probably a marketing decision. They might be trying to space out
the 4 engine options a bit more evenly. At the moment the 8v outsells
the 150bhp 16v by quite a margin.
Huw.
|
2217.10 | To boost V6 sales? | FUTURS::SAXBY | Is it friday yet? | Fri Feb 04 1994 09:34 | 5 |
|
Also, take a look at the performance figures for the V6 Calibra. It's
actually SLOWER than the 150bhp 16v in some areas...
Mark
|
2217.11 | pass the flat cap | BONNET::HARDY | | Fri Feb 04 1994 11:10 | 7 |
| Chaps,
It might also have a flatter power curve giving better power/torque at
the kind of revs that most people use most of the time.
Boring old Peter
|
2217.12 | | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Fri Feb 04 1994 12:23 | 13 |
| Re.7
>>>re.6:
>>>> An engine that produces less power and uses more fuel isn't progress.
>>>Maybe you can breathe what comes out of the exhaust?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>Dave ;-)
You're not serious of course - I didn't see a smiley?
Malcolm.
|
2217.13 | Um? | FUTURS::LONGWY::LEWIS | Imagine being without a Newt | Fri Feb 04 1994 12:34 | 10 |
| > The ECOTECH engine is 2L 16V and is supposed to be the most
> technologically advanced 16v in the world! Ie it meets all EEC regs,
I don't understand this statement, (It does have four cylinders,
doesn't it ?).
There are any number of 16V engines out there with *half* the capacity
that could better 136bhp...
Rob
|
2217.14 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Bugs B Gone | Fri Feb 04 1994 12:42 | 10 |
| > >>>Maybe you can breathe what comes out of the exhaust?
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>>Dave ;-)
>
> You're not serious of course - I didn't see a smiley?
Malcolm, you seem to miss smileys very easily. What is that next to
Dave's name ?
Royston
|
2217.15 | Time for a trip to the eye doctor? | CGOOA::PITULEY | Ain't technology wonderful? | Fri Feb 04 1994 15:18 | 7 |
|
Yeah, c'mon! I can see *that* smiley way over here in Canada!!
:-)
Brian
|
2217.16 | Vroom | PEKING::ATKINSA | PRC Vauxman. | Fri Feb 04 1994 15:20 | 8 |
|
RE.10
The V6 may lack in some areas,but what a noise!!!
Andy.
|
2217.17 | A big smiley for Malcolm (he won't miss this!) | VANGA::KERRELL | The first word in DECUS is Digital | Fri Feb 04 1994 16:04 | 5 |
2217.18 | | WELSWS::HEDLEY | Lager Lout | Fri Feb 04 1994 16:13 | 3 |
| Dave, can you post an ascii version for those of us with cheapo terminals? :(
Chris.
|
2217.19 | Am I forgiven? | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Mon Feb 07 1994 13:17 | 9 |
| Humble apologies! Must be going blind in me old age!
That's my excuse anyway!
It is even more embarassing, having as my Pre-Sales Tech. Support focus area
VXT 2000s (amongst other things!), and type in VTX instead and not realise it,
even when the rest of the group are taking the mickey for it!!!
Malcolm. 8-(
|
2217.20 | Now the Cavalier SRI | UKARC1::CHAMBERLIN | Ian Chamberlin | Fri Feb 11 1994 15:50 | 10 |
| The friendly man at Wadham Kenning told me that the 8 valve Cavalier SRI
has been discontinued.
The only SRI model will be a 2 litre 136hp 16 valve, available March 1994.
It will be interesting to see if this comes in at the same lease cost as
the 8 valve (any one got an order in the pipeline?) or whether the
level 8/9 allowance will be revised up to cover the extra cost?
/ian
|
2217.21 | no chance... | HEWIE::RUSSELL | Just a SAP fall guy... | Tue Mar 01 1994 09:15 | 13 |
| re. 20;
>It will be interesting to see if this comes in at the same lease cost as
>the 8 valve (any one got an order in the pipeline?) or whether the
>level 8/9 allowance will be revised up to cover the extra cost?
Since the 8/9 allowance should have been based on the 16v version in
the first place, and the car changes were simply a way to reduce costs,
I don't think there is much chance of this.
(Cost of 16V is base + 1170...)
Peter.
|
2217.22 | EXAUST PROBLEMS ??? | WOTVAX::HATTONM | I could fit in an unmod'ed Mclaren, at half the price | Mon Nov 13 1995 13:07 | 19 |
|
I have a 2.0 16v eng in my new cavalier Aug-95 and it has suffered from
the following problem, which the mechanic told me was "a normal"
problem with this version of the "crapalier"....
When driving, the correct way !, round roundabouts or right hand
corners of various radius a metallic rubbing/gratting noise can be
heard. Turns out to be the exaust box comming loose/dropping off
@!#@$#!. Know common problem on this engine size.
To test: drive round a roundabout and "load" up the rear end and
listen....
Anybody else suffered/suffering from this ????
Regards,
- MARK -
|
2217.23 | Oh yes! | WOTVAX::ROWEM | Frank Gamballi's Trousers | Thu Nov 16 1995 12:58 | 4 |
| Yep. changed into a loud drumming eventually. now after "adjustment"
it just buzzes a bit...
Matt.
|
2217.24 | SAME, SAME, any other "features" | WOTVAX::HATTONM | I could fit in an unmod'ed Mclaren, at half the price | Thu Nov 16 1995 14:19 | 12 |
|
Mine still "buzzes a little too....
Also noticed last night that the clutch pedal squeaks now, just about
every time I take my foot of it.... driving me up the wall!!!!
Anybody else got this, or any other "features" I need to be aware of??
Regards,
- MARK -
|
2217.25 | | WOTVAX::STONEG | Temperature Drop in Downtime Winterland.... | Thu Nov 16 1995 14:25 | 4 |
| >> Also noticed last night that the clutch pedal squeaks now, just about
>> every time I take my foot of it.... driving me up the wall!!!!
surely this is why they fit a Radio ?
|
2217.26 | Tried that.... | WOTVAX::HATTONM | I could fit in an unmod'ed Mclaren, at half the price | Thu Nov 16 1995 15:31 | 5 |
|
Tried that.... I can still here the F#$$%^$ squeak.... and it's STILL
P%$%%$ me off !!!
_ MARK -
|
2217.27 | Squirt the little meeces | WOTVAX::ROWEM | Frank Gamballi's Trousers | Thu Nov 16 1995 20:25 | 4 |
| Try WD-40 the wonder fluid...
:-)
Matt.
|
2217.28 | | 29545::BURDEN_D | A bear in his natural habitat | Thu Nov 16 1995 21:58 | 8 |
| >Try WD-40 the wonder fluid...
> :-)
It might actually work in the short term, but it will dry up quickly and leave
the squeak. Try some silicon spray or something similar that will stick around
longer.
Dave
|
2217.29 | Change the car for my old R19-16V!!! | WOTVAX::HATTONM | I could fit in an unmod'ed Mclaren, at half the price | Fri Nov 17 1995 14:03 | 1 |
|
|