[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference terri::cars_uk

Title:Cars in the UK
Notice:Please read new conference charter 1.70
Moderator:COMICS::SHELLEYELD
Created:Sun Mar 06 1994
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2584
Total number of notes:63384

2217.0. "New 16v vauxhall engine???" by BRUMMY::BRACEY (There ain't no sanity clause) Thu Feb 03 1994 12:48

    In December I ordered a 16v Calibra, and was given a delivery date of
    March.  Hertz told me today that it has been delayed for a month as all
    16v vauxhall's built after 16th Jan are being fitted with a new engine
    called ECOTECH. 
    
    Great! I thought, new engine new technology etc it has to be better
    than the old engine, no problem. Wrong, the new engine is 136 bhp vs
    the 150 Bhp of the old engine and probably uses more petrol even though
    ecologically safer. The garage it's coming from say it will probably
    come with the old engine as it was ordered late Dec and it's a question
    of wait and see what is delivered.
    
    I don't mind having the new engine if the performance and fuel
    consumption remain the same. However I do believe Vauxhall have
    misrepresented the spec of this car in their literature. I will be
    pretty pi***ed off if the performance is significantly down on that of
    my (2 cars ago) GSI 16v Cavalier.
    
    Does anyone know anything about this engine etc?
    
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
2217.1COMICS::FISCHERLife's a big banana sandwichThu Feb 03 1994 13:1910
But maybe the new engine won;t have the cutting out
problem in the current 16v or the problem where water
can get inside the engine and bend it.

Is this still a 2.0 litre or are they fitting the 1.8 16v
on Calibras now? (The one that goes on the 1.8 Astra GSi.



	Ian
2217.2LEMAN::CHEVAUXPatrick Chevaux @GEO, DTN 821-4150Thu Feb 03 1994 13:565
    .0�    than the old engine, no problem. Wrong, the new engine is 136 bhp vs
    .0�    the 150 Bhp of the old engine and probably uses more petrol even though
    
    I'd think the new engine will need less petrol. My personal guess based
    on current manufacturers hot developments ...
2217.3Is this progress????BRUMMY::BRACEYThere ain't no sanity clauseThu Feb 03 1994 16:2324
    I have just had a phone call explaining all.
    
    The ECOTECH engine is 2L 16V and is supposed to be the most
    technologically advanced 16v in the world!  Ie it meets all EEC regs,
    the rest I will leave to your own judgment.
    
    
    		BHP	0-60   	30-50	TOP 	URBAN	56	75	
    
  	16V
  	OLD	150	7.5	7.5	137	27.2	48.7	39.2
    
  	16V
  	ECOTECH	136	8.5	7.5	131	26.9	47.1	38.7
        NEW
    
    
    	This slight difference will probably make no difference whatsoever
    	to the driving or the petrol costs so I'll go for it.
    
    	But I ask myself is this progress????????
    
    	Guy      	
                            
2217.4COMICS::FISCHERLife's a big banana sandwichThu Feb 03 1994 17:3711
>    		BHP	0-60 
>	16V
>  	OLD	150	7.5


7.5 secs for a 16V Calibra??? Where did you get those figures
from then? A&M, What Car and Top Gear put the figure at 8.1
or 8.3 secs.


	Ian
2217.5Difference is 1 secBRUMMY::BRACEYThere ain't no sanity clauseThu Feb 03 1994 17:498
    It says 7.5 in the Vauxhall glossies, and I actually clocked my Cavalier
    GSI at 7.2  secs to a genuine 60 mph.
    
    Anyway the point is the published Vauxhall figure is 1 sec slower
    for the new engine.
    
    
    Guy 	
2217.6Backward progressMILE::JENKINSNorfolk enchanceThu Feb 03 1994 20:4912
    
    Cavaliers are quicker 0-60 than the Calibras. Calibras are much
    heavier.
    
    Re : The new 16v
    
    An engine that produces less power and uses more fuel isn't progress.
    
    
    The 16v 1.8 must be nearly that quick.
    
    Richard.
2217.7VANGA::KERRELLThe first word in DECUS is DigitalFri Feb 04 1994 08:077
re.6:

> An engine that produces less power and uses more fuel isn't progress.

Maybe you can breathe what comes out of the exhaust?

Dave ;-)
2217.8Calibra weight myth.FUTURS::SAXBYIs it friday yet?Fri Feb 04 1994 08:5116
    
    Re .6
    
    I always hear how heavy Calibras are (certainly they FEEL more
    substantial than Cavaliers), but here are some figures :
    
    Calibra 8v - Kerb weight 23.5 hundredweight
    Cavalier 2 litre Sri - Kerb weight 23.7 hundredweight
    
    Obviously the Calibra is NOT 'much heavier' than a Cavalier, in
    reality.
    
    Mark
    
    PS I always found my Calibra to feel quicker than the GSi Cavaliers 
    I drove.
2217.9Businessmen not Engineers?BLKPUD::WILLIAMSHFlat tank Sunbeam riderFri Feb 04 1994 09:065
    It's probably a marketing decision.  They might be trying to space out
    the 4 engine options a bit more evenly. At the moment the 8v outsells
    the 150bhp 16v by quite a margin.
    
    Huw.
2217.10To boost V6 sales?FUTURS::SAXBYIs it friday yet?Fri Feb 04 1994 09:345
    
    Also, take a look at the performance figures for the V6 Calibra. It's 
    actually SLOWER than the 150bhp 16v in some areas...
    
    Mark
2217.11pass the flat capBONNET::HARDYFri Feb 04 1994 11:107
    Chaps,
    
    It might also have a flatter power curve giving better power/torque at
    the kind of revs that most people use most of the time.
    
    Boring old Peter
    
2217.12CMOTEC::POWELLNostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it?Fri Feb 04 1994 12:2313
Re.7

>>>re.6:

>>>> An engine that produces less power and uses more fuel isn't progress.

>>>Maybe you can breathe what comes out of the exhaust?
		 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>Dave ;-)

	You're not serious of course - I didn't see a smiley?

				Malcolm.
2217.13Um?FUTURS::LONGWY::LEWISImagine being without a NewtFri Feb 04 1994 12:3410
   > The ECOTECH engine is 2L 16V and is supposed to be the most
   > technologically advanced 16v in the world!  Ie it meets all EEC regs,
    
    
    I don't understand this statement, (It does have four cylinders,
    doesn't it ?).
    There are any number of 16V engines out there with *half* the capacity
    that could better 136bhp...
    
    Rob
2217.14COMICS::SHELLEYBugs B GoneFri Feb 04 1994 12:4210
    >     >>>Maybe you can breathe what comes out of the exhaust?
    >                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    >     >>>Dave ;-)
    >
    >             You're not serious of course - I didn't see a smiley?
    
    Malcolm, you seem to miss smileys very easily. What is that next to
    Dave's name ?
    
    Royston
2217.15Time for a trip to the eye doctor?CGOOA::PITULEYAin't technology wonderful?Fri Feb 04 1994 15:187
    
    Yeah, c'mon!  I can see *that* smiley way over here in Canada!!
    
    :-)
    
    Brian
    
2217.16VroomPEKING::ATKINSAPRC Vauxman.Fri Feb 04 1994 15:208
    
    RE.10
    
    The V6 may lack in some areas,but what a noise!!!
    
    
    Andy.
    
2217.17A big smiley for Malcolm (he won't miss this!)VANGA::KERRELLThe first word in DECUS is DigitalFri Feb 04 1994 16:045
2217.18WELSWS::HEDLEYLager LoutFri Feb 04 1994 16:133
Dave, can you post an ascii version for those of us with cheapo terminals?  :(

Chris.
2217.19Am I forgiven?CMOTEC::POWELLNostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it?Mon Feb 07 1994 13:179
Humble apologies!  Must be going blind in me old age!

That's my excuse anyway!

It is even more embarassing, having as my Pre-Sales Tech. Support focus area
VXT 2000s (amongst other things!), and type in VTX instead and not realise it,
even when the rest of the group are taking the mickey for it!!!

				Malcolm. 8-(
2217.20Now the Cavalier SRIUKARC1::CHAMBERLINIan ChamberlinFri Feb 11 1994 15:5010
The friendly man at Wadham Kenning told me that the 8 valve Cavalier SRI
has been discontinued.

The only SRI model will be a 2 litre 136hp 16 valve, available March 1994.

It will be interesting to see if this comes in at the same lease cost as
the 8 valve (any one got an order in the pipeline?) or whether the
level 8/9 allowance will be revised up to cover the extra cost?

/ian
2217.21no chance...HEWIE::RUSSELLJust a SAP fall guy...Tue Mar 01 1994 09:1513
re. 20;

>It will be interesting to see if this comes in at the same lease cost as
>the 8 valve (any one got an order in the pipeline?) or whether the
>level 8/9 allowance will be revised up to cover the extra cost?

Since the 8/9 allowance should have been based on the 16v version in
the first place, and the car changes were simply a way to reduce costs,
I don't think there is much chance of this.

(Cost of 16V is base + 1170...)

Peter.
2217.22EXAUST PROBLEMS ???WOTVAX::HATTONMI could fit in an unmod'ed Mclaren, at half the priceMon Nov 13 1995 13:0719
    
    I have a 2.0 16v eng in my new cavalier Aug-95 and it has suffered from
    the following problem, which the mechanic told me was "a normal"
    problem with this version of the "crapalier"....
    
    When driving, the correct way !, round roundabouts or right hand
    corners of various radius a metallic rubbing/gratting noise can be
    heard.  Turns out to be the exaust box comming loose/dropping off
    @!#@$#!.  Know common problem on this engine size.
    
    To test:  drive round a roundabout and "load" up the rear end and
    listen....
    
    Anybody else suffered/suffering from this ????
    
    Regards,
    
    - MARK -
    
2217.23Oh yes!WOTVAX::ROWEMFrank Gamballi's TrousersThu Nov 16 1995 12:584
    Yep. changed into a loud drumming eventually. now after "adjustment"
    it just buzzes a bit...
    
    Matt.
2217.24SAME, SAME, any other "features"WOTVAX::HATTONMI could fit in an unmod'ed Mclaren, at half the priceThu Nov 16 1995 14:1912
    
    Mine still "buzzes a little too....
    
    Also noticed last night that the clutch pedal squeaks now, just about
    every time I take my foot of it.... driving me up the wall!!!!
    
    Anybody else got this, or any other "features" I need to be aware of??
    
    Regards,
    
    - MARK -
    
2217.25WOTVAX::STONEGTemperature Drop in Downtime Winterland....Thu Nov 16 1995 14:254
    >> Also noticed last night that the clutch pedal squeaks now, just about
    >> every time I take my foot of it.... driving me up the wall!!!!
    
    surely this is why they fit a Radio ?
2217.26Tried that....WOTVAX::HATTONMI could fit in an unmod'ed Mclaren, at half the priceThu Nov 16 1995 15:315
    
    Tried that.... I can still here the F#$$%^$ squeak.... and it's STILL
    P%$%%$ me off !!!
    
    _ MARK -
2217.27Squirt the little meecesWOTVAX::ROWEMFrank Gamballi's TrousersThu Nov 16 1995 20:254
    Try WD-40 the wonder fluid...
    :-)
    
    Matt.
2217.2829545::BURDEN_DA bear in his natural habitatThu Nov 16 1995 21:588
 >Try WD-40 the wonder fluid...
 >   :-)
  
It might actually work in the short term, but it will dry up quickly and leave
the squeak.  Try some silicon spray or something similar that will stick around
longer.

Dave 
2217.29Change the car for my old R19-16V!!!WOTVAX::HATTONMI could fit in an unmod'ed Mclaren, at half the priceFri Nov 17 1995 14:031