T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2038.1 | Just economical with the truth... | PFENIG::DRAPER | | Mon Mar 08 1993 13:18 | 14 |
| Not a problem I've ever experienced, Sharon - and I've been in Digital
a while now (just about to order my 10th car). In at least six of these
I've known in advance where the car would be coming from, and I've
never been (absolutely) refused this information.
Of course, nobody will seek you out and tell you this information - you
have to go hunting for it - and you may not get it from the first
person you come across, so don't give up at the first hurdle!!
Well - failed on all counts there, didn't I - couldn't tell you why you
weren't getting the information, and broke the two syllable rule!!
Steve
|
2038.2 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Hypodeemic nerdle | Mon Mar 08 1993 13:31 | 12 |
| In theory this information is irrelevent as far as the lessee is
concerned. All we need to know is roughly when the car is due to
arrive. The lease company concerned should phone you about a week in
advance to arrange delivery.
Obviously, if you haven't heard then car fleet should be able to trace
the problem.
Maybe they don't give this info because they don't want you chasing the
lease company directly.
Roy
|
2038.3 | | VANGA::KERRELL | but that's not my real job | Mon Mar 08 1993 13:36 | 4 |
| The lease company should be known at quote time because of the difference in
tyre mileage rules. The PHH rule is too close for comfort (16,000 miles).
Dave.
|
2038.4 | | KERNEL::FISCHERI | I can always sleep standing up | Mon Mar 08 1993 13:57 | 12 |
| I had an anticipated delivery date of March 1st. During the week before, I rang fleet
to get the garage name so I could phone to arrange delivery. They told me that
when the garage has the car, they will contact me. On March 1st they rang me
and I got the car on March 3rd. I'm sure the garage want to get rid of the car
as soon as they get it in, so I don't see why we need to know where it's coming
from. Obviously if I hadn't heard anything by now, I be ringing fleet to find
out what's happeniing.
Just be patient, and when the car comes, they'll tell you.
Ian
|
2038.5 | | WOTVAX::EBYGUM::WATTERSONP | another day another bill | Mon Mar 08 1993 14:00 | 13 |
|
Don't bother today. My car was due for delivery on 1-Mar, my current
car has gone over 60,000 and is presuambly costing the company money.
When I eventually got through to the relevant person at car-fleet, I
was informed that Hertz were the lease company dealing with it, but
they're all off sick today, so I should phone car-fleet again tomorrow.
I orginally submitted my quotes in late October, and the complete lack
of any communication from car-fleet really p*sses me off - it's always
me chasing them, I hate to think how long it would take if I did
nothing.
Paul
|
2038.6 | Patience my a**, I'm gonna kill something! | KERNEL::LEYLANDS | Sharon Leyland | Mon Mar 08 1993 14:28 | 9 |
|
All I want to know is a realistic delivery date cos I'm trying to by my
old one aswell. also, if the garage phone me and want to deliver it
after the 22nd (or whatever the magic date is) am I expected to then
negotiate another date??
If so why can't I speak to them now and arrange a date?
Sharon
|
2038.7 | They don't necessarily give you any warning at all | IOSG::SHOVE | Dave Shove -- REO2-G/M6 | Mon Mar 08 1993 18:14 | 11 |
| Well, my current car was delivered, totally unannounced, on 4-Jan-1993
(first working day after the Christmas break). When I got in, there was
a phone message for me from Security to say that they had the keys (it
was apparently delivered at around 8am).
As it happened, this didn't matter at all, but I can think of
circumstances where it could have been very inconvenient, and/or cost
DEC money (I could have been on holiday or away on business for X
weeks, for example).
D.
|
2038.8 | | KERNEL::FISCHERI | I can always sleep standing up | Tue Mar 09 1993 13:31 | 12 |
| I thought you needed to sign for the car saying you accepted it in good
condition.
I've noticed that there are loads of notes in here moaning about car fleet.
It's OK for getting things off your chest, but does anyone know how we
officially complain and make our voices heard? Do they have a complaints
procedure? There must be something we can do, but I don't really know what.
Any ideas?
Ian
|
2038.9 | | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Tue Mar 09 1993 14:53 | 4 |
|
I've had 3 new DEC cars now and I've not signed for any of them!
Richard
|
2038.10 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Hypodeemic nerdle | Tue Mar 09 1993 15:05 | 5 |
| I would insist that I sign for a new car.
What if it was an old model or didn't have all the options specified ?
Roy
|
2038.11 | | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Tue Mar 09 1993 15:25 | 5 |
|
I didn't get any option I was on my way to go pick them up and they
were delvered early, and signed for by the nearest person!
Richard
|
2038.12 | | MARVIN::ROBINSON | OSI Upper Layer Architect | Tue Mar 09 1993 15:45 | 10 |
| In both my cars, there was something wrong with the options when delivered,
In the first case, the delivering garage phoned up before to explain they
had fitted an alarm by mistake. In the second case, the delivery
driver convinced me the radio was the model I requested. I had forgotten
the extra model I wanted. When I complained to the lease company and
garage who came to fix the correct model.
Answer- you can still complain after delivery.
Dave
|
2038.13 | heres why I want to know! | WOTVAX::HATTOS | I think, Therefore I'm paid less | Wed Mar 10 1993 12:07 | 15 |
| Getting back to the base note.......
I used to want to know the delivering garage as well. The reason for
this being I don't trust delivery drivers! How many have you seen
screaming past you in brand new cars on the motorway, still with trade
plates on?
I wouldn't want my car run in in this fashion, would you?
Unfortunately Fleet won't allow us to pick up from Garages any more, so
that means our cars are probably sha**ed before we drive them!
Stuart
|
2038.14 | Are lease cars worth the hassle? | IOSG::SHOVE | Dave Shove -- REO2-G/M6 | Wed Mar 10 1993 14:56 | 18 |
| The last time I had a new lease car (4th Jan this year - see .7), it
was delivered at about 8am and signed for by one of the Security men (I
had received no warning that it was going to be delivered).
When I went out to look at it, it was filthy dirty, and there was about
a teaspoonful of petrol left (despite the delivery note, when I found
it stuffed behind one of the seats, clearly saying "full tank petrol").
If I had been there when it was delivered, I would have told the driver
to take it away and bring it back clean and filled up.
Did I complain? No, I didn't in the end - by the time I had found
someone in Fleet to moan at, and they (maybe) had passed my complaint
on to PHH, who (maybe) had passed it on to the garage, who (maybe) had
passed it on to the delivery company or their driver, it didn't seem
worth bothering.
D (who is now on his LAST lease car!).
|
2038.15 | | ESBS01::RUTTER | Rut The Mutt | Wed Mar 10 1993 15:06 | 12 |
| � that means our cars are probably sha**ed before we drive them!
Even *if* this is the case, why should you really care ?
After all, the car goes back to the lease company in 2 or 3 years.
Treating an engine badly when new, but for a short period of time,
isn't going to show up in that period of it's life, is it ?
And if it did, you are going to be provided with another vehicle.
Isn't this the reason that people take lease cars ?
J.R.
|
2038.16 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Hypodeemic nerdle | Wed Mar 10 1993 15:12 | 8 |
| Re .14
Should Security be authorised to sign for new cars ?
I had a demo car delivered early a while ago and the delivery driver
waited until I arrived at the office to personally sign for it.
Roy
|
2038.17 | Fed-up | ARRODS::WHITAKER | The man from Hull | Wed Mar 10 1993 18:50 | 14 |
|
Going back to note .8 (Do Car Fleet have a complaints procedure?)
does anyone have an answer for this ? I submitted a quote request
in mid December and I finaly received the price notification on
the 20th of February. It was the only piece of official
communication I received from Car Fleet. No-one answered the mails
I sent until they got nasty.
I submitted another quote request a week ago...
Andy
P.S. It took 8 MONTHS to get my first car so things might be
getting better!
|
2038.18 | You might not care... | KERNEL::LEYLANDS | Sharon Leyland | Thu Mar 11 1993 12:28 | 18 |
| RE: 15
<<< Note 2038.15 by ESBS01::RUTTER "Rut The Mutt" >>>
>> Even *if* this is the case, why should you really care ?
A. I care because I am paying for it.
B. I will have to drive it for 3 years.
c. I may well want to buy it at the end of the lease.
Unfortunately, that sort of attitude is probably the reason why we get
treated like we do by Car Fleet!! (IMHO)
Sharon
|
2038.19 | | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Thu Mar 11 1993 13:54 | 16 |
| Resisting the temptation that some contributors to this discussion
would like me to succumb to, getting personal, there is an escalation
process for CarFleet problems, which is little different from any other
problem in this company.
You can involve your manager
You can involve HRO
You can contact the manager who is responsible for CarFleet Admin.
or perm any combination of these options.
I, as one of these people, am reasonably public in this conference and
will try to resolve your problems where I am able, but will not use a
"public" forum to resolve individual issues.
Doug
|
2038.20 | OK...go for it! | KERNEL::LEYLANDS | Sharon Leyland | Thu Mar 11 1993 15:36 | 11 |
| RE: 19
Doug
Perhaps then you can answer the base note question, which is NOT a
personal issue - it affects ALL company car Leasee's.
Why the big secret????
Sharon
|
2038.21 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Hypodeemic nerdle | Thu Mar 11 1993 16:26 | 9 |
| Re .20
We are very fortunate to have Doug participating in this conference
with his insight on what is going on in car fleet.
He is aware of all the replies here and I'm sure he will comment where
he sees fit.
Roy
|
2038.22 | | ESBS01::RUTTER | Rut The Mutt | Thu Mar 11 1993 17:27 | 7 |
| � -< You might not care... >-
Well, to be honest, I do care.
Just I can see how it is easy to adopt the attitude of "It's not my car".
J.R.
|
2038.23 | Immaturity breeds contempt! | WOTVAX::HATTOS | I think, Therefore I'm paid less | Fri Mar 12 1993 08:31 | 16 |
| <<< Note 2038.15 by ESBS01::RUTTER "Rut The Mutt" >>>
>> Even *if* this is the case, why should you really care ?
I couldn't agree with Sharon more, you should care because you have to
drive the vehicle for the next 3 years. You are legally bound by your
contract to care for the companies assets, (dont get pedantic here you
know what I mean). You should care if you are going to buy the vehicle.
And lastly you should care because that is the mature and responsible
think to do.
What a quaint attitude and outlook on life you appear to have, simply
because something isn't yours doesn't mean you shouldn't care about how
it is treated.
GROW UP
|
2038.24 | FLAME ON : | ESBS01::RUTTER | Rut The Mutt | Fri Mar 12 1993 11:37 | 49 |
| � -< Immaturity breeds contempt! >-
I cannot remember being called 'immature' before. If so, it must
have been a long time ago when that may have been the case.
Personally, I think you should withdraw this comment.
It is rude, impolite, arrogant and incorrect.
I would accept being called a 'big kid', if meant as a jest.
But the tone of your note is obviously not at all light-hearted.
�>> Even *if* this is the case, why should you really care ?
�
� I couldn't agree with Sharon more, you should care because you have to
� drive the vehicle for the next 3 years. You are legally bound by your
� contract to care for the companies assets, (dont get pedantic here you
� know what I mean). You should care if you are going to buy the vehicle.
Note my earlier reply - I said that 'I do care'.
I was expecting replies to state reasons why one should care. I had
not anticipated that I would be 'attacked' in Notes.
You have included some valid points, but who is getting pedantic ?
� And lastly you should care because that is the mature and responsible
� think to do.
� What a quaint attitude and outlook on life you appear to have, simply
Quaint, is it ?
� because something isn't yours doesn't mean you shouldn't care about how
� it is treated.
If a person, or company, treats someone poorly, then I think it not
unsurprising if that someone doesn't care for the property of that
other person/company. I was only voicing the attitude that I have
seen and heard in my lifetime. That doesn't make it right. Nor does
it mean that I actually think that way.
� GROW UP
To this, I am tempted to put in some exceptionally arrogant, impolite
comment - but that is probably what you would enter. I AM 'grown up'.
J.R.
|
2038.25 | set mod/hat=on | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Fri Mar 12 1993 12:46 | 11 |
| I think .23 should retract his attack on J.R.
Firstly, this conference isn't the place for personal attacks.
Secondly, all .15 implies (to me anyway) is that its human nature
not to worry as much about a company car as your own car because
you won't have to foot the bill at the end of the day.
I don't think this is an immature statement, its a fact of life.
Roy
|
2038.26 | Well put | KERNEL::MCGOWAN | | Fri Mar 12 1993 13:34 | 5 |
| Ever considered the diplomatic service Roy ?
They may have a little job for you sorting out a wee tiff in Bosnia :-)
Pete
|
2038.27 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Anag: Barlow Urine | Fri Mar 12 1993 13:47 | 4 |
| .23 is an unjustified attack on John Rutter. He simply isn't that sort
of person.
Laurie.
|
2038.28 | Here goes.... | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Fri Mar 12 1993 13:55 | 35 |
| There is no big secret nor are you not allowed to know.
The question is, do Fleet know the answer to your question.
You order a car via Fleet Admin, who transmit the order to the Lease
Co. that has won the business for your car. That order has a delivery
address and date. The date, ideally, is timed for the optimum disposal
of your old car to avoid early termination penalties and over
mileage/age costs.
The Lease Co orders the car from their network of dealers and the
dealer should contact you near the delivery date to finalise
arrangements with you. You should have the opportunity to inspect and
accept or reject the car.
Fleet Admin do not know, or need to know the supplying dealer. Fleet
(Digital) has a contract with the Lease Co. and they in turn have a
contract with the dealer.
In Sharon's case the anticipated delivery date is, I understand 17
March and the Lease Co. is PHH.
Buying your old car is separate arrangement. There should be no
question of a Key for Key swop (old for new) and if, as in Sharon's
case, there is already a request for a used car value with a view to
buying that can and will happen. It doesn't all need to happen at
precisely the same moment.
I regret that Dave (filthy + a teaspoon of petrol) Shove did not
complain - I would have - bitterly to the Dealer, Fleet & The Lease Co.
There is no reason for Digital to tolerate lack of performance like he
has described from the Dealer.
I hope this makes things a little clearer.
Doug
|
2038.29 | Sorry I started this... | KERNEL::LEYLANDS | Sharon Leyland | Fri Mar 12 1993 14:03 | 9 |
|
Thanks for that Doug, I could challenge a few of the points you made
by quoting what has been said to me by both car fleet and Hertz but
since I have discovered where my car is coming from it really doesn't
warrant any more bad feeling.
I will just bow out gracefully.
Sharon
|
2038.30 | I SHALL have the last word !?!?!?!?!? | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Fri Mar 12 1993 14:16 | 17 |
| Just to keep this going a little longer - I'm sure Sharon could
challenge some of what I've said - it's mutual, that's why I didn't
want to get down to the individual level. What I said is clearly what
should happen and I am aware that in the past our customers have been
able to make three phone calls to fleet and hear three different
stories. That's part of the challenge to me in trying to raise the
Service level.
I am convinced that the main problem here is the communication issue.
If you know what to expect from Fleet and you know what Digital expects
from you as far as cars are concerned then we shall all have a base to
work from.
My money says if it's a Renault from PHH it will either be DTM in
Swindon or Baldocks at Bracknell !!!!
Doug
|
2038.31 | Wrong... | KERNEL::LEYLANDS | Sharon Leyland | Fri Mar 12 1993 14:23 | 4 |
|
Guess again Doug!!!
Sharon
|
2038.32 | Doug, Your advice would be nice: | LARVAE::JORDAN | Chris Jordan, TSE - Technology Services, End-User Computing | Fri Mar 12 1993 14:29 | 15 |
| One more Doug, (but answer off-line to Chris Jordan @ UCG if it is not
a general answer).
My car has done 58,500 miles. It is due for replacement (date wise) on
5th May. I have been quoted a delivery date of 7th May. These two dates
(and your earlier reply) indicate there is a tie up between delivery of
the new car, and release date of the old one.
HOWEVER I will exceed 60,000 miles in about 12 to 15 days time. Is it
worth the effort to get the delivery date pulled forward, or is it not
possible, or shall I go over 60,000 miles in my car, or should I get a
new one from the pool list for the 8 weeks reamining before the new car
is delivered??
Cheers, Chris
|
2038.33 | More info please Doug | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Fri Mar 12 1993 15:14 | 26 |
|
I think it would be nice if we all had the answers to -.1 in general
terms of course, as there is a lot of confusion over these sort of
issues at present.
Ie. We all understand it incurrs penelties if we go over mileage/date
but how much can they go over before we incurr penalties?
conversely there must be costs involved in admin (& valeting I believe)
to taking over a car off the takeover list, where should the line be
drawn?
For example my lease expires 22/apr/93 but I anticipate it will be
2,000 miles short of the 60,000 and my anticipated delivery date is
04/may/93 do I assume there would be no penalty for this short period
or would it make economic sense to return my car on 22/apr/93 and make
alternative arrangements (pool car or short takeover) until my new car
is delivered? as at present we get no communication from fleet on these
subjects.
thanks Doug
Richard (young@wlo)
Ps. I go on holiday to cornwall on 8/may so if it is delivered 3 days late
it could get even more complex.
|
2038.34 | | WOTVAX::HATTOS | I think, Therefore I'm paid less | Fri Mar 12 1993 16:56 | 8 |
| .23 withdraws his attack on Mr Rutter, a bad morning after feeling,
caused a vitriolic pen.
After many coffees, I think I was well out of order.
My apologies sir,
Stuart
|
2038.35 | | ESBS01::RUTTER | Rut The Mutt | Fri Mar 12 1993 17:48 | 5 |
| � My apologies sir,
Quite happily accepted
J.R.
|
2038.36 | I knew | RODLEY::hilton | Party on Dudes | Mon Mar 15 1993 09:45 | 22 |
| Well I always like to know where my car is coming from, so I can hurry it
along.
I'm only on my 2nd lease car, but both times I've been in communication
with the garage in question.
This last time round my existing car had done over 60,000, so I tracked
down the garage by:
1. Ringing fleet and ascertaining the lease company.
2. Ring said lease company and asking for garage name.
3. Ringing garage, telling them I wanted the new car asap to save DIGITAL
money.
And, yes, it did work I got it a month earlier than the anticapated date,
and Mr Hattos, I picked it up myself.
There is NO WAY anyone can prevent you picking up your new lease car, in
fact the garage suggested it to me, for various reasons.
Greg
|