T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1711.1 | | PERKY::RUTTER | Rut The Nut | Tue Mar 03 1992 09:09 | 5 |
| >> Is it better than a standard 325 Sport (competent, but bland?), or
I would most surely hope so.
J.R.
|
1711.2 | | VOGON::ATWAL | dream out loud | Tue Mar 03 1992 09:16 | 7 |
| Bill, it may be worthwhile checking this/last weeks Autocar&Motor as they've
got a buyers guide for the M3 (and MB 190 16v & Sierra Cosworths). There's
also a lead article on John Lyon driving at over 200mph on an autobahn
in a Diablo.
...Art
|
1711.3 | Mr Paranoid asks... | NEWOA::SAXBY | Go ahead, Punk. MAKE MY TEA!!!! | Tue Mar 03 1992 09:19 | 13 |
|
Views on the M3.
They ought to get on and finish the damned thing! :^(
I read an article on secondhand M3s somewhere. It said that the
steering, especially, was better than a 325 Sport, but that RHD
conversions use the 325 rack and so eliminated the advantage, so
stick to LHD.
Mark
PS What do they cost to insure?
|
1711.4 | | FORTY2::BETTS | X.500 Development | Tue Mar 03 1992 09:31 | 13 |
|
Thanks,
I've read the Autocar/Motor article - not their best, it just
didn't convey a feel for the car, or differentiate it from the
more mundane BMW models.
LHD isn't a problem, I'd view RHD conversions very sceptically.
William.
PS. Art, the article's OK, but I've seen him driving the Diablo
in Britain - even better. May even get a longer go in it myself.
|
1711.5 | | GVA05::STIFF | Paul Stiff, DSSR, DTN:821-4167 | Tue Mar 03 1992 10:54 | 10 |
| I knew a brand manager with P&G that had one a few years ago.
It was bright orange, and seemed to have endless engine problems -
blown gaskets, injection failures - it did not seem very reliable, he
did find it fun though.
His name is Nicolas de Chevron-Villette and he now works for Pepsi Cola
in Paris - why not fax him, he is a car nut.
Paul.
|
1711.6 | M3 ramble. | DCC::HAGARTY | Essen, Trinken und Shaggen... | Tue Mar 03 1992 11:01 | 70 |
| Ahhh Gi'day...�
I owned one for three years, just handed it back about 5 months ago.
The evolutions have more power (220Ps) as opposed to the normal one
(200 or 195 with Kat). They geared the damned evolutions higher
though, so although it's top speed is higher (245 versus 235), the
acceleration is worse.
The engine is a modern work of art! 2.3l, 16 Valve four cylinder.
Great power, smooth, wonderful reving. It used to be a skill to do a
full 7250 rpm shift from 1st to second in the minimum time. Wonderfull
0-100 times if you got the change right. It's got a great rumble, and
it's very easy to break the 225's loose on take off.
Stick to the LHD models. The steering (servotronic) is simply the best
system I could imagine. The steering was much better than even the
other threes, it was almost perfect (makes my current Audi S2 look
toyish in comparison).
The ride is ROUGH. Very precise, but you may find it ROUGH. Even the
very good roads in Germany (except for city cobblestones) transmitted
every bump. The ride was very good, but you could feel a matchstick
under the wheel. No compromise in that department. I often wish I got
the adjustable suspension option (sometimes you get tired of driving a
"race car").
The handling? Well, I still haven't made up my mind in that dept. It
was great to drive and throw around. The handling was very sensitive
to tyre pressure and temperature. A hot day on tyres set up in colder
weather, and you could slide it like crazy.
I was never realy satisfied with the handling. You would go howling
through a sweeper, and really felt deflated, because you never knew how
close to the limit you were, and weather you could've taken it 10 Kph
faster. I always suspect that you could've but when it broke away, it
was like a binary switch. Because there was no "give" in the
suspension, you never got an idea of when it was about to go. I end
for ended it once at about 70 mph.
I had a few electrical problems. The air intake seals also went, and I
think they were going again when I got rid of it. Watch out for one
that goes gurumph-gurumph on idle. It should idle smoothly.
Wind noise was fairly great over about 210 kph.
I got the M3 for one reason. It was the best value for money BMW you
could drive.
The prices went something like:
325 base DM 40K
Options DM 20K (To make it a bit of a racer)
M3 base DM 60K
Options DM 10K
The prices have escalated to ridiculous levels since then.
A lot of the options were standard on the M3. Even the ones you could
get were cheaper on the M3. You also didn't have to get the expensive
Motorsport bodywork option that you needed on the 325 to make it look
decent (takes away the chrome). The 325s then only had about 175Ps,
although they're now 194 (?).
Options are up to the subsidiaries to decide, but abs is standard on
just about every BMW now (certainly 320 and above).
PS It's sh*thouse in snow, even with LSD. Although I managed not to
ding it through three winters on summer tyres.
|
1711.7 | Great car | EEMELI::HAUTALA | Greasy Joe's Bottomless Grill Pit | Tue Mar 03 1992 12:02 | 15 |
|
re -1:
I once made a mistake with one M3 thinking it was 316. It passed
my 99 hp Golf like I was standing still. 8-)
M3 is surely one of the fastest from 0-60!
Cool car, but not for slippery roads.
Hannu
|
1711.8 | Cheaper than a Ford | KERNEL::BROWNE | Chris Browne Operational Management Team | Wed Mar 18 1992 08:49 | 10 |
|
re .- a couple
Autocar reckoned they could get insurance for about 700 squid
on an oldish one, cheaper than the Merc 190 2.3 Cosworth and
the Sierra Cossie.
C
|
1711.9 | Wicked car. Buy one! | ARRODS::WILLIAMSON | | Thu Apr 02 1992 11:07 | 40 |
| Having owned an M3 for 18 months (traded it in last Sunday for
something a bit quicker), I thought I'd put in my 2p's worth.
M3 = great car. As others have said, RHD conversions use the
comparitively imprecise 325i steering rack, and require knocking about
of the exhaust manifold. I found LHD no problem at all in real life -
the perception is far worse than reality! Stick with LHD.
They are not hand-built. The M3 is a production-ised car built by BMW
but designed by BMW Motorsport.
Reliability? Not bad. A couple of minor problems, but it always
started and always got me where I wanted to go. Quickly.
Handling is excellent by production car standards. However, not caring
about ride quality, I had the AC Schnitzer suspension kit fitted,
together with Hartge netative camber front mounts and a front strut
brace. This made the car handle much better, look great (about a
couple of inches lower), but you felt every crisp packet you drove
over! Overall, I was glad that I had this modification done.
Insurance is quite cheap, if you know where to look. I went through
Peart Associates' new 357 plan, and insured mine for about �700 (I was
24 when I renewed with them, and this quote was about 2/3 what I was quoted
elsewhere!). FYI, 0539 730 666.
Power? Mine was the 215bhp 2.3l with cat. The BBR chip gives 225-230
bhp, plus ups the rev limit to 7,800rpm, and gives a more snappy
response from 4,000+ rpm. Fair value at around �275.
The ultimate question - would I have another? You bet. But I'd
probably buy a second-hand 2.5l Sport Evo and have the standard M3's
final drive ratio fitted with BBR's Sport Evo chip to give me better
acceleration - mind you, I'm just a speed freak, so those mods wouldn't
really be necessary for sensible people!
If you want to chat more, call me at HHL.
Dave.
|
1711.10 | | PERKY::RUTTER | Rut The Nut | Thu Apr 02 1992 12:00 | 10 |
| >> the perception is far worse than reality! Stick with LHD.
I agree with this comment, from when I had an integrale.
>> Having owned an M3 for 18 months (traded it in last Sunday for
>> something a bit quicker), I thought I'd put in my 2p's worth.
So what do you have now ? Not a Ford, I hope ;-)
J.R.
|
1711.11 | Ever heard of G-force? | ARRODS::WILLIAMSON | | Thu Apr 02 1992 15:12 | 5 |
| No, not a Ford. A Porsche 911 Turbo. Performance makes my old M3 look
like a Dinky toy.
Dave.
|
1711.12 | I'll swap ya! | REPAIR::ATKINS | | Thu Apr 02 1992 16:47 | 9 |
|
RE.11
I don't suppose you've got any jobs going at the moment,in YOUR
department?
Jealously......Andy....MUFC
|