T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1683.1 | Go for a GSi | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Looks like he hit the tree Jim | Mon Feb 03 1992 16:23 | 7 |
| �which cars are the most secure
Vauxhalls with deadlocks are the best idea I've come across.
I believe the new Astra range now has these fitted as standard.
Roy
|
1683.2 | No-one bothers nicking a Calibra in Kensington! | NEWOA::SAXBY | Is Bart Simpson the Anti-Christ? | Mon Feb 03 1992 16:39 | 6 |
|
Look for a new house/job seems to be the best answer.
Thefts are more related to region that type of car.
Mark
|
1683.3 | Taxi!! | BAHTAT::BORKALA | Life shows no mercy | Mon Feb 03 1992 16:45 | 8 |
| Chris,
Get a Peugeot 309 Diesel, I don't think anyone will try to nick one of
those, besides if they do, then you could always catch up with them on
foot. :-)
Eric
|
1683.4 | The government figures | TIMMII::RDAVIES | An expert Amateur | Tue Feb 04 1992 13:28 | 6 |
| I've got the info sent by the home office. It lists cars in high medium
and low risk categories.
I'll try and dig it out.
Richard
|
1683.6 | best to by a old banger! | VOGON::MITCHELLE | Beware of the green meanie | Tue Feb 04 1992 17:20 | 9 |
|
Never mind how secure your car is... how about the 'accessories'?
A friend of ours came back to his car (Westfield 7) in Tilehurst
Station car park yesterday eve, to find it sitting on it's brake disks!
All five wheels had been stolen during the day. Luckily it seems that
there has been no other damage done to it, but it is not easy trying to
get wheels onto a car which is sitting on it's sump!
|
1683.7 | Hit any good walls recently Keith? :^) | NEWOA::SAXBY | Is Bart Simpson the Anti-Christ? | Tue Feb 04 1992 17:25 | 25 |
| Re .5
Well as my Calibra has never (not since I've owned it anyway) been
to Kensington I can only guess that the average car thief there may
have a different aim to the joy-rider in Leeds. More likely to be
nicking a Ferrari or Porsche for resale than impressing the lads was
my slightly tongue in cheek point.
Like you said Cavaliers (and Calibras) are pretty good, but nothing
is secure from theft if someone is really determined, so a good rule
of thumb is (where possible) don't leave your car where it's likely
to be nicked or broken into (deadlocks don't prevent someone dropping
a rock through your windscreen and nicking the radio).In fact a relative
of mine had just that happen to him outside his in-laws house on a
sleepy housing estate, so nowhere is REALLY safe.
A number of noters have commented that car theft is a serious problem
in certain areas and even having a secure car isn't going to guarantee
that it won't be stolen or broken into if car theft is a common
occurence.
The best defence, although not a very appealing one, would seem to be
to drive a car that no-one would want to nick. A Trabant, perhaps?
Mark
|
1683.9 | Hardly what you'd call SECURE, though. | NEWOA::SAXBY | Is Bart Simpson the Anti-Christ? | Wed Feb 05 1992 09:07 | 23 |
|
Well, who'd want a car which had been driven into a wall? You may
have a point.
Still a minute to get in is hardly likely to discourage many thiefs,
if they really fancy a GSi Cavalier or a Fiesta RS Turbo (witness this
conference).
What is the answer? I don't know, but it seems that that car security
is more of a selling point than a genuine benefit, although it is good
to see manufacturers making an effort, especially the big ones (where
do the likes of BMW and Mercedes come in such tables?). If you think
I'm wrong about car security being a selling point, just take a walk
around your local Halfords and see how many 'car security' products
there are on the shelves! Someone's making a lot of money out of these
things.
I must admit that the very poor showing of the Rovers is dissapointing.
One last question. Was the 'breaker-in' allowed to damage the car in
trying to obtain access?
Mark
|
1683.10 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | I take my hat off to Georgie B | Wed Feb 05 1992 09:14 | 4 |
| Surely the best way to stop yer car being nicked, is to fit a clamp to
it...
Laurie.
|
1683.12 | | PAKORA::IJOHNSTON | | Wed Feb 05 1992 11:00 | 9 |
| >>>>>>>>>. Besides if I saw a car clamped so no one
stole it, I think I would put their windows in just to be as equally
annoying.
Keith.
Do that very often do you???
|
1683.13 | | NEWOA::SAXBY | Is Bart Simpson the Anti-Christ? | Wed Feb 05 1992 11:02 | 28 |
|
I don't think we're really disagreeing Keith, Halfords (etc) used to
sell electronic ignition systems widely and now they're virtually
impossible to get, due to the widespread standard fitment of such
things.
� The 'breaker-in' as you put it was not allowed to damage the cars
� is any way. Which, if the would be thief is after your GTi GSi or
� whatever, is unlikely to do.
I'd disagree with this. You're assumption is that the thief wants your
car to keep. The majority of thefts these days are of the steal, thrash
and crash type. Why should a thief worry about scratching the paintwork
if he intends to burn your car out or plough it into a tree? Even the
organised theft for spares thief isn't going to worry unduly about
damaging the door panel or breaking a window. Whatever you reckon about
Vauxhalls and Fords and Gtis, etc they're probably not worth the effort
to try and resell, only cars like Mercs, BMWs, Rollers, Porsches, etc
are really worth the hassle of re-registering, doctoring chassis
plates etc and people involved in stealing them for resale won't be
disuaded by a minute to get in without special tools (you can bet THEY
have them!).
I'm all in favour of better security for cars and like the idea of my
car having deadlocks and a standard alarm, but I'm under no illusion
that if someone really wants to nick my car that they will.
Mark
|
1683.15 | | NEWOA::SAXBY | Is Bart Simpson the Anti-Christ? | Wed Feb 05 1992 11:47 | 14 |
|
Having had my previous car broken into, I was NEVER under the
impression that my car would not be stolen, but as I moved house last
year I'm not likely to move again in a hurry anyway!
As for changing jobs, who knows? :^)
Going back to regional matters though, I was amazed by the comments of
people living in Reading of regular attempts to break into their cars.
I know if they lived in one of Reading's quieter suburbs that they'd
not be as likely to suffer from this, so maybe choosing where you live to
avoid theft (and no doubt other crimes) isn't such a daft idea at all?
Mark
|
1683.16 | Anti-theft device | SUBURB::LAWSONM1 | | Wed Feb 05 1992 12:51 | 8 |
| Has anyone any comments on the new anti theft device housed in the
Renault clio 16v. This is held in a discreet place and is supposed to
imobolise the electronic managment system. I would be interested to
hear how a thief might potential work his way around that one.
I agree with past replies in that anto-theft devices are being used as
effective nmarketing tools.
|
1683.17 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Mon Feb 10 1992 11:43 | 7 |
|
One of the Reading freebe rags mentioned there were 200 cars stolen in
Reading in two days, and were recommending people NOt to park in the
multi stories - I have no-idea where they think people can park,
Reading parking is abysmal at the best of times!
Heather
|
1683.18 | Where, then ? | SBPEXE::PREECE | Just gimme the VAX, ma'am... | Mon Feb 10 1992 12:20 | 32 |
|
>>> One of the Reading freebe rags mentioned there were 200 cars stolen in
>>> Reading in two days, and were recommending people NOt to park in the
>>> multi stories -
I had my car broken into on Friday, in Reading, and that's exactly what the
police said to me..... "Well, you shouldn't have left it here (the Broad St Mall
multi), this is where they all get stolen from"
Where am I *supposed* to park, then ?
On present form, it looks to be cheaper to leave my car somewhere very
visible and just pay the parking fines than to pay out for damage and loss !
... and if they *know* that all the car-thieves are in the multis, why aren't
there lots of policemen hanging about waiting to pick them up?
It seems to me that one good organised evening of surveillance could pick
up a very large proportion of the b*******s.
(Though a local copper, with whom I discussed this, pointed out that the
people like me, who have to park in car-parks, are usually visitors, so
they don't vote for the local councilllors, who sit on the watch committee,
so who cares ?......)
Did I read somewhere that insurance companies are refusing to give full-comp
to people who live in the more popular target areas of Reading ?
....or did I imagine it ?
Ian
|
1683.19 | Hi Ian..... | PAKORA::IJOHNSTON | Eat `em up! Yum!Yum! | Mon Feb 10 1992 12:56 | 3 |
| A small question....if all the cars are being stolen from this car park
how are the thieves getting the cars out without making themselves
noticed?? Does everyone leave there ticket in the car?
|
1683.20 | | TIMMII::RDAVIES | An expert Amateur | Mon Feb 10 1992 13:04 | 4 |
| 1683.19 : invalid question it's a park and display car park NO control on
exit.
Richard
|
1683.21 | | TIMMII::RDAVIES | An expert Amateur | Mon Feb 10 1992 13:06 | 6 |
| re Note 1683.0 by BAHTAT::FRANZ "Chris Franz, Leeds, UK"
I've got the information in work, If you let me have a fax number or
infernal snail address I'll send it to you.
Richard
|
1683.22 | the Arabs have the best solution..... | BASCAS::BELL_A1 | | Mon Feb 10 1992 19:41 | 9 |
|
re .18....
probably not....but one thing you can believe is that Insurance
companies wont insure Motorcyclists under the age of 28 fully comp.....
The only way to deal with this is to bring back capital punishment, coz
it works, the lad who nicked my bike will verify that.........
Al...
|
1683.23 | The soft law | BAHTAT::FRANZ | Chris Franz, Leeds, UK | Tue Feb 11 1992 14:52 | 28 |
| RE: 1683.18
Regarding Police surveilance.
I live in Leeds in a converted old hall which is now 10 flats.
About eight of the occupants living there (including myself) have had
their cars stolen , some more than once. It seemed a very reasonable
assumption to me , that if the Police were to keep the area under
surveilance for several nights, then they would surely catch the
criminals red-handed. Anyway, about two weeks ago , one of the
neighbours had his Golf GTI stolen , for the FOURTH time. When the
police arrived I asked one of them why they didn't put the area under
surveilance. He told me that they could wait several days and not get a
result, thus wasting manpower. So it all seems like a resources issue.
It really makes me frustrated when on the news they talk of how
the government are cracking down on Joyriders/Car Theives. In my
opinion , car theft should carry a mandatory 5 year spell behind bars
and I also think that the parents of the youths resposible should also
be held responsible, because let's face it, these kids are out until
the early hours of the morning commiting crimes, and if their parents
can't stop them , then who can. Perhaps the Joyriders should also be
birched, just for good measure.
The bottom line to my argument is that the criminals seem to have
more rights than the victims.
It makes me mad. Grrrrrrrr.
|
1683.24 | law? | EEMELI::HAUTALA | Cool, man! | Tue Feb 11 1992 17:28 | 13 |
|
RE -1:
The law is also soft here in Finland; if someones steals a car
and drives it somewhere and leaves it (usually damaged) he/she
get practically no punishment at all ( if gets caught).
By law is is called UNAUTHORIZED BORROW!
Young kids make here most of car-thefts and cause insurance
taxes go high and owners go mad.
Hannu
|
1683.25 | | EEMELI::JMANNINEN | IKnowIt'sTrue'causeISawItOnVT | Wed Feb 12 1992 05:48 | 13 |
| Re: .-1
And here in Finland the police is not even allowed to arrest car
thieves.
Why, you? The police is not allowed to arrest anybody if the maximum
punishment from the crime is two or less years in jail. And this is
the case in the 'unauthorized borrow' of a car.
Please, do not tell this to the British joy-riders ;')
- Jyri -
|
1683.26 | | TASTY::JEFFERY | You get surface noise in real life! | Thu Feb 13 1992 11:40 | 8 |
| I don't think car theft is that important.
Joy riding, however, carries the risk of injury to
innocent third parties, and should be pursued.
Who cares that someones GTI gets stolen??
Mark.
|
1683.27 | who cares? | EEMELI::HAUTALA | Cool, man! | Thu Feb 13 1992 13:11 | 12 |
|
re -1:
>Who cares that someones GTI gets stolen??
Someone does.
I think you care if your car will be stolen some day. Or maybe you
have a company car and don't care about material. 8-)
Hannu
|
1683.28 | Live in the real world | BAHTAT::FRANZ | Chris Franz, Leeds, UK | Fri Feb 14 1992 09:51 | 6 |
| RE: .26
People with massive insurance bills, car repair bills etc etc
probably mind their cars being stolen.
Obviously it has never happened to you, or you too would have a more
realistic opinion on the matter....
|
1683.29 | | NEWOA::SAXBY | Go ahead, Punk. MAKE MY TEA!!!! | Fri Feb 14 1992 09:56 | 14 |
|
Actually it HAS happened to Mark, but it was only a company car so the
blow was greatly cushioned.
Mark does have a point though, crime against property seems to be treated
more severely than against people. A hangover (hopefully soon to be
swept away) from the "Me First" era of the Eighties.
Mark
PS Company cars push up servicing, repair and insurance bills. They
should be made highly unattractive (except to REAL needers - anyone
doing over 30k miles a year on business, say) and then we'd see a
swing back to more reasonable costs in all areas, I suspect.
|
1683.30 | | LEECHS::hilton | How's it going royal ugly dudes? | Fri Feb 14 1992 10:51 | 5 |
| > doing over 30k miles a year on business
WOW! That would be very hard to acheive Mark! I'm hardly ever in the
office, and don't expect to cover 30k miles
|
1683.31 | When I'M Chancellor! | NEWOA::SAXBY | Go ahead, Punk. MAKE MY TEA!!!! | Fri Feb 14 1992 10:59 | 4 |
|
So, you don't need a company car! :^)
Mark
|
1683.32 | | IEDUX::jon | Air travel shrinkwraps the world | Fri Feb 14 1992 11:14 | 5 |
| I agree with the two Marks. I know I'd far rather have my car stolen -
even if it was my own rather than a lease car - than be physically
attacked. I guess different people think differently.
Jon
|
1683.33 | Bring back the birch...... | SBPEXE::PREECE | Just gimme the VAX, ma'am... | Fri Feb 14 1992 11:26 | 31 |
| re. .36
It's not just a case of "Who cares if your company GTi gets stolen,
DEC/Hertz/PHH will give you another one..."
First:
If the car wasn't stolen in the first place, the joyriders wouldn't have
anything to joy-ride in.
Second:
In our case, DEC has to bear the cost of the elevated insurance premiums, which
affects the copmpany's financial performance, which, in turn, affects the
pound in my pocket, or not.
There's also the question of all the stuff that gets stolen with (or from)
your car, which can often cause more chaos than the loss of the car itself.
(and is, in my case at least, more expensive, since DEC's insurance cover isn't
enough to replace it all)
Also, when work-related material, information, papers, etc are taken (and
most likely dumped in the canal), there's loss of time and money to DEC in
re-assembling the information.
It's not quite as simple as that......
Ian
|
1683.34 | | TASTY::JEFFERY | You get surface noise in real life! | Fri Feb 14 1992 13:58 | 16 |
| You missed my point.
Even though its a company car, I like it. But, even if it were my own,
I would *NEVER* rate it above a person.
So, compared to Assault, Rape or Murder, car theft comes a pretty poor
99th.
Thats why I made the point about Joy riding being more dangerous than plain
car theft. With joy riding, there is a risk to an innocent third party.
There is a brilliant Fry & Laurie sketch, with Stephen Fry giving an MP
style lecture on why not stealing my car was the cornerstone of a decent
society.
Mark.
|
1683.35 | clear up stats | WOTVAX::BROWNR | Fat boys on tour 1994 | Mon Feb 07 1994 10:14 | 35 |
| This note seems the best place for what I've got to ask.
Does anyone what the claer up rate for car crime is ?
Whatever it happens to be I'm getting somewhat suspicious that the
Police (who I have an inherent dislike of) are fixing the figures. I've
had my car broken into 3 times over the past three years and
although I didn't expect anyone to be caught I thought it best to
report the crime anyway. About 18 months after the first 2 incidents I
got a letter from the West Midlands police stating that someone already
in prison had intimated that he was responsible for the crime against
me and as he was already in prison no further action would be taken and
the case was now closed.
The first time I got a letter like this I never questioned it but to
receive a second letter exactly the same got me somewhat suspicious as
it's obviously a standard letter. I say it's a standard letter because
it contained the statement 'no property has been recovered'. In both
incidents no property was taken.
So what do people think?
Is it a coincidence ? I'm expecting another letter in about 6 or so
months concerning the third incident, if that's the same, well...
Are the police trying to make the clear up stats better ? I mean how
can someone remember the details of all his crimes after such a long
period. I cannot even remember the name of the pub I was in during the
second incident after this long.
Has anyone else received such letters ?
Cheers
Andy
|
1683.36 | They don't really care | WELCLU::MANRO | | Mon Feb 07 1994 10:26 | 21 |
| re: -1.
Andy,
At least you recieved letters from them. My car has been roken into
twice, i have found the police to show total disinterest in these
crimes!!
The second time my car was broken into, outside Glaxo in Greenford, est
London, i rang the police to report the crime and they could'nt even be
bothered to send someone out to have a look! In fact i was asked to
drive down to the local station to report the crime. I was most
furious. You would think that they might want to come down and have a
look and get some fingerprints etc. I often see a lot of broken glass
in the same spot as i drive past, and this is obviously a haunt for a
person(s). I'm sure if the police were interested in catching these
people they could do something about it!!
>>i have an inherent dislike of policemen.......Likewise , for many
other reasons apart from this.
Sheleen.
|
1683.37 | They do care about scruffy cars on the road. | FORTY2::GEDDES | Gordy | Mon Feb 07 1994 12:50 | 8 |
|
I find it even more annoying when your car gets broken into by some
smashing a window to steal #1.50. Rather than drive around in a car with a
window missing I replaced the door (unfortunately it was the wrong colour). I
then get stopped by the police for driving a car that looked like it did not
have an MOT because it was so scruffy. And those were his exact words.
Gordy.
|
1683.38 | | WOTVAX::GILLILANDP | Not very Tuna-friendly | Mon Feb 07 1994 12:52 | 8 |
| re. 35
I saw a documentary once about this very thing, only it was house
burglaries. It was implied in no uncertain terms that it was a regular
practice and the Police were knowingly using it as a devious method for
the Police to imrove their stats.
Phil Gill.
|
1683.39 | Sounds like time to have a word in the ear of ones' MP! They would love it! | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Mon Feb 07 1994 13:41 | 0 |
1683.40 | Car crime | PGREEN::RICHARDS | | Wed Nov 09 1994 12:59 | 51 |
| Well it finally happened. After 24 years of motoring, two toe-rags
tried to steal my car. I know that there were two of them because they
were spotted lurking around the cars prior to coming into the pub to have
a pint (according to the landlord/kitchen staff). Before anyone had
sussed out exactly what they had done they had made their escape in in
an XR2 which they had to push start, presumably because that was stolen
as well.
Anyway to the point. Here are a few thoughts about this experience:
1. For all the publicity about Vauxhall being one of the most security
conscious manufacturers, it was incredibly simple for these sh@ts
to get into my fully alarmed, centrally locked and deadlocked car.
They used a screwdriver to prize the bottom lip of the plastic (I
thought it was metal) plate which houses the door handle and lock
barrel. Having broken this lip they simply pushed the whole
assembly into the door cavity and manipulated the central locking
levers etc. To demonstrate how little force is required to do this,
they didn't even dent the door skin. Must have taken them seconds to
do this and in the process deactivate the alarm which is controlled
from the door key/central locking. This is a p*ss poor design........
....it's round to the local vehicle security shop to have a decent
alarm fitted.
2. The only thing that stopped them taking the car was the AUTOLOCK
that was fitted at the time. If they had removed this the normal
vehicle steering lock would have offered little opposition. For those
of you not familiar with the AUTOLOCK, it fits across the steering
wheel and snap locks in place. They broke a screwdriver into three
pieces trying pry this apart - unfortunately there was no blood in the
car so they didn't injure themselves when the screwdriver broke.
3. The Police were called. According to the landlord this is now a
statutory requirement for Pubs and Restaurants to notify the Police
in cases like this. They turned up 15 minutes later and went
through the formalities; crime report, statement etc. It was some
comments that he made that made me think.
As we were filling the crime report, he wrote at the top "Attempted
theft of a motor vehicle". As he did this he said "This is one that
the government won't like". When I asked why he told me that the
government have insisted that some car crimes be reclassified. Theft
of property from a motor vehicle is now classified as `Criminal
Damage". In this way they have managed to make it look as if car
crime is reducing and hailing this as a victory. The Police have
apparantly opposed this move to frig the figures with no success.
There are several points here, some of which may already be covered in
other entries - Mr moderator please feel free to redirect me to a more
approprite note or move this one. Has anyone got any observations?
|
1683.41 | | FORTY2::HOWELL | Just get to the point... | Wed Nov 09 1994 13:29 | 17 |
| It's a sad fact that everyone states after an event like this, and it's
probably the last thing that you want to hear, but basically ... if
they want it, they'll get it.
Forget all the advertising blurb most car manufacturers use about
'deadlocks' ... some advertise 'shielded lock mechanisms' which, in
some cases, has turned out to be 'shielded with thin plastic'. I
believe expensive German car manufacturers (ie. BMW, Mercedes, Porsche)
actually have decent door locks/steering locks shielded with heavy
metal plate, but apart from that nobody else jumps to mind.
I prefer the idea one guy had of wiring his Sierra Cosworth up to
the mains and frying the scum who tried to nick his motor, but
unfortunately this is illegal and gets _you_ into trouble. Ahh well.
It's a funny old world...
Dan
|
1683.42 | Deadlocks worked for us. | PIECES::ALCOR::RUSLING | Place holder for NOTES | Wed Nov 09 1994 13:34 | 16 |
|
When we lived near the University in Reading there were
several attempts to steal my wife's Cavalier from the drive,
none of them succeeded. When she had the model with deadlocks,
they didn't get past them and so I've always assumed that they're
pretty good. Like your attempt, they did pop out the lock
though. I have one of those big bars recommended by the AA that
fits over the steering wheel for my MG even though it is unlikely
to be stolen either for parts (they're too cheap) or for joyriding
(not enough room). The Peugot is alarmed, immobilized and has
one of those card key thingys that joins up the key wires.
As for the government fiddling the figures - well what do you
expect?
Dave
|
1683.43 | Vauxhall seem a favourite target | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Wed Nov 09 1994 15:07 | 10 |
| The SRi's here in Leeds are going faster than hot cakes, a guy I know
at Olivetti has his nicked/broken into once a week on average.
Someone even cooly broke into it in the office car park, in full view
of a number of windows, and calmly drove off, some saw the car leaving
at a normal sedate pace, and assumed it was the owner!
Cheers,
Greg
|
1683.44 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | The InfoHighway has too many side-roads. | Wed Nov 09 1994 15:28 | 6 |
| Those things that clip on the steering wheel are fairly easily
circumvented. All one has to do is to hackshaw though the rim either
side of it. I suppose a wheel clamp is the best idea. Whatever, as has
been said, if they want it, they'll have it, one way or another.
Cheers, Laurie.
|
1683.45 | | GENIE::GOODEJ | Mr Dragon - 761 4831 | Wed Nov 09 1994 15:39 | 10 |
|
Re .3
>> The SRi's here in Leeds are going faster than hot cakes, a guy I know
>> at Olivetti has his nicked/broken into once a week on average.
how many SRi's has this guy got if he loses one a week on
average??? 8-)
JBG
|
1683.46 | | RDGE44::ALEUC8 | | Wed Nov 09 1994 17:42 | 6 |
| sad, but true. had my much-loved 205 GTI nicked earlier this year and
recovered wrecked.
decided to get a car that wouldn't be a target so i'm plodding about
in a 106 -hopefully no thief will target that. pragmatic but ... i'd
rather have a nice car !
|
1683.47 | Battling Ultrasonics... | BLKPUD::ROWEM | Frank Gamballi's Trousers! | Thu Nov 10 1994 10:06 | 8 |
| I was lucky enough to convince my manager tha the Cav deadlock system
was not enough and had a second alarm fitted. If anyone else does
this make sure before activating both alarms that you've disabled
the vauxhall ultrasonics with the button above the drivers seat
or the two sonics will "fight" and set each other off! I've had
it happen and it's embarassing....
Good Luck
Matt.
|
1683.48 | End of story - Nope! | PGREEN::RICHARDS | | Thu Nov 10 1994 11:10 | 54 |
| >>I was lucky enough to convince my manager tha the Cav deadlock system
>>was not enough and had a second alarm fitted. If anyone else does
>>this make sure before activating both alarms that you've disabled
>>the vauxhall ultrasonics with the button above the drivers seat
>>or the two sonics will "fight" and set each other off! I've had
>>it happen and it's embarassing....
Matt, what make, type of alarm did you have fitted and what was the
cost?
As an addendum to my base note and as a note of caution for others.
Last Sunday when the attempted theft of my car occurred, I and my family
were on our way back from a weekend in Devon. As a precaution whenever
away from our house I always take the keys to my wife's car with me.
The theory is that if anyone breaks into the house whilst we're away
then we don't make it too easy for the burglers to become car thieves
as well. Well, you guessed it, like a complacent idiot I left them out
of sight in the glove compartment of my car whilst in the restaurant.
They were the only thing taken. Golf GTi key, front door key, garage door
keys, alarm remote control - the lot.
Worried that if they have the registration of my car, or if there was
something in the car that gave away my address, I checked with the
Police to see how easy it is to get an address from a VIN.
Both Basingstoke local and the Newbury lot (the incident happened at the
Winning Hand on the A4) hesitated then said that it was very
difficult as this sort of information comes under the data protection
act and that fees would have to be paid and requests for info made in
writing to either the police or DVLC.
I'm not convinced and have taken the precaution of changing house locks etc.
But here's the rub, checking with my insurance broker as to which company
was going to pay for what, my wife's company were contacted who promptly
said that unless I changed the locks on her VW, she was not insured.
Gulp! I seem to have convinced them that now that I have a fitted yet
another security device to it (another steering wheel lock) that it
should be OK. List of security on my wife's car:
Gear to handbrake security device
Steering wheel crooklock
manufacturer's steering lock (useless)
lock plates
alarm system and immobiliser
locking wheel nuts
Do I feel that it's safe? Not
Paul :-(
|
1683.49 | | FORTY2::HOWELL | Just get to the point... | Thu Nov 10 1994 11:24 | 12 |
| It's just getting a joke, isn't it? If only the insurance companies
would drop dead, it'd make me feel a heck of a load better.
What's it coming to that people have to do this to their cars just so
they can keep them. It's not the police's fault. It's not entirely the
insurance companies fault either.
The sooner we can go back to chopping the hands off criminals, the
better, I say.
My sympathy,
Dan
|
1683.50 | Serpi Star ? | BLKPUD::ROWEM | Frank Gamballi's Trousers! | Thu Nov 10 1994 13:39 | 7 |
| The Alarm remote says "Serpi Star" on it, the fitting was arranged by
car fleet as part of the delivery, as for normal non alarmed cars
in field service that had to have alarms fitted for carrying company
property. the car is K reg Cav Sri 16v. I'm sorry I've no idea on
the cost, car fleet would be able to tell you with luck?
Matt.
|
1683.51 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Always with the -ve waves | Thu Nov 10 1994 14:36 | 7 |
| �"Serpi Star"
Car Fleet fit VSL alarms.
You can contact VSL on 0582 324269.
Royston
|
1683.52 | | MKTING::WILSON | | Fri Nov 11 1994 11:06 | 11 |
| My Audi Coupe Quattro is fitted with an alarm, immobiliser, handbrake guard
and steering wheel lock. Even with this lot fitted I am still uneasy about
leaving it parked on the street.
I have decided that if it get's nicked, I'll pin a medal on the guy if I see
him......after I have had a quiet "word" with him of course.
The personal hassle and stress factors associated with car theft is bad.....never
mind trying to get the car back!
John
|