T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1678.1 | Why not check out #1334 | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Wed Jan 29 1992 13:37 | 11 |
| re: 1678.0 �I have tried various "dir/tit=" etc.
Have you ?
Notes> dir/tit="new bmw"
> 769 SHIRE::GOLDBLATT 20-SEP-1989 36 new BMW
1334 WOTVAX::ANDERSONE 9-JAN-1991 16 NEW BMW 3 SERIES
1678 BAHTAT::SALLITT 29-JAN-1992 0 New BMW 300-series
Roy
|
1678.2 | Thank you | BAHTAT::SALLITT | a legend in his lunchtime | Wed Jan 29 1992 13:48 | 1 |
|
|
1678.3 | 316? A disappointment | EEMELI::HAUTALA | Cool, man! | Wed Jan 29 1992 14:57 | 12 |
|
I test drove 316i and I think it is much overpriced for a car like
that; no hot performance, average handling, poorly equipped, even
noisy compared to any car of that price-class.
I also drove 520i after that and it felt totally like different car.
520 was silent, had good torque, felt steady at high speed. It
was a real BMW after that new little brother.
I was not impressed with 316.
Hannu
|
1678.4 | Severely regretting getting a Volvo 480 | YUPPY::FOX | Tam bona est ut non epotetur! | Wed Jan 29 1992 15:29 | 9 |
| Re .3
But what were you comparing it to?
The 316i is not marketed as "hot performance" motoring - perhaps you
should look at a 320i or 325i?
Not everyone wants high performance, just an all-round good performer
and quality car.
|
1678.5 | | ULYSSE::CHEVAUX | Patrick Chevaux @VBE, DTN 828-5584 | Wed Jan 29 1992 15:40 | 6 |
| .3� I test drove 316i and I think it is much overpriced for a car like
.3� that; no hot performance, average handling, poorly equipped, even
.3� noisy compared to any car of that price-class.
What did you expect ? the poor little engine has to cope with 1.4 ton
of metal.
|
1678.6 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Wed Jan 29 1992 15:54 | 3 |
| re: 1678.4 �-< Severely regretting getting a Volvo 480 >-
Out of interest, why ?
|
1678.7 | | VOGON::KAPPLER | Spontaneity is fine in it's place.... | Wed Jan 29 1992 16:02 | 1 |
| cos he could have had a Rover 2xx or 4xx series! (-:
|
1678.8 | Please! | DOOZER::JENKINS | Another 'ken year | Wed Jan 29 1992 17:25 | 2 |
|
Not that bloody advert again!
|
1678.9 | New 318is | SEDSWS::PHIPPEN | what happens if I press thi.. | Thu Jan 30 1992 16:27 | 14 |
|
The new 318iS coupe seems like a good car, According to AUTOCAR and
motor the car is priced at about 17,500 and comes with alloys,M-TEC
suspension, colour coded body, ABS, sport steering wheel, elect. windows
cent. locking and elect. mirrors, But electric sunroof is a #800
option, The car has 140bhp, and the article says 0-62 10 secs, but
BMW calim 0-60 is just under 9. Max speed 132mph, Its a better looking
car than the saloon, and is more than a match for the 320i.
So I am going to order one with electric sunroof and maybe leather
interior
|
1678.10 | Nice one, Jason | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Thu Jan 30 1992 16:34 | 1 |
|
|
1678.11 | | DCC::HAGARTY | Essen, Trinken und Shaggen... | Fri Jan 31 1992 11:59 | 5 |
| Ahhh Gi'day...�
The old 318iS is a nice hack, but hardly brilliant. The new 320i is
much better, the engine is back in BMW's territory (sixes). Handling
is reportedly not as fatal as the old 3's.
|
1678.12 | The old 3 came good, reputations are hard to shift | WOTVAX::MEAKINS | Clive Meakins | Fri Jan 31 1992 12:33 | 8 |
| > The old 318iS is a nice hack, but hardly brilliant. The new 320i is
> much better, the engine is back in BMW's territory (sixes). Handling
> is reportedly not as fatal as the old 3's.
The old 318iS handles very well, the M Technic set up being reponsible.
I believe the new 3's utimately understeer to make front wheel drivers
feel at home. The result is a car that lacks the sporting feel of the
old 3 (+ M Technic).
|
1678.13 | 325i | SEDSWS::PHIPPEN | what happens if I press thi.. | Fri Jan 31 1992 13:51 | 8 |
|
I had a test drive of the newish 325i SE last weekend, And was most
impressed, this car had the M-tec suspension and stuck to the road
very well, excelleration was good a well, the coupe version of this
should be a very good car, but at about #23,000+ it should be, As an
option you can have the M-tec steering wheel for a snip...Just #200 +
vat.
|
1678.14 | ??? | DCC::HAGARTY | Essen, Trinken und Shaggen... | Fri Jan 31 1992 13:55 | 3 |
| Ahhh Gi'day...�
You sure we drive the same 318iS?
|
1678.15 | I'm interested to know | PLAYER::WINPENNY | | Fri Jan 31 1992 13:57 | 7 |
|
RE. -1.
"excelleration" Nice one. Was that intentional?
Chris
|
1678.16 | New 318is not old one | SEDSWS::PHIPPEN | what happens if I press thi.. | Fri Jan 31 1992 14:21 | 13 |
| RE: .14
I am not on about the old 318is, I am talking about the 318is coupe to
be released at the end of march, The old one is a cr*p (In my opinion),
but the new one sounds really good, in .13 I was talking about the
325i SE, which is s'posed to be very similar.
Not a fan of the old 3 series at all
shoeboxes on wheels
|
1678.17 | Something for the money | EEMELI::HAUTALA | Cool, man! | Sat Feb 01 1992 09:18 | 12 |
|
RE .4
I compared 316 to old 316 and 320. But I have not tested new 325 with
"M" suspension, it could be totally different.
Does pure quality cost so much if all other things are average? Of
course our German friends just buy those high-end models that are
different, but here in Finland they cost mega-marks.
Hannu
|
1678.18 | It's all subjective | KERNEL::MCGOWAN | | Mon Feb 03 1992 13:30 | 8 |
| RE .16
So what's your definition of cr*p then ? I'm very pleased with my old
shape 318iS. OK, so it hasn't got the performance of a hot hatch (my
last car was a R5GTT), but it's much nicer to drive (IMO). Perhaps I'm
getting old ?? :-)
Pete
|
1678.19 | a 316i will do for me.... | BAHTAT::SALLITT | a legend in his lunchtime | Thu Feb 20 1992 13:08 | 15 |
| I eventually got to road-test a new 316i. Performance wasn't shattering
from a standstill, but certainly adequate in 3rd. gear from 40 to 70
mph. Handling, ride, balance, feedback to the driver were good too,
without compromising a comfortable ride. It also seemed very solid and
well screwed together.
Most of my driving is long distance, and as don't live in a large town
I don't need traffic-lights-Grand-Prix performance, so the 316i looks a
good deal. I've been driving a Volvo 740 for the last year (makes my
wife's Nova seem like Porsche, but super-comfortable on the motorways),
so the 316i's 37.7 mpg at 75 mph will be as good as a pay rise.
Thanks for the replies to .0
Dave
|
1678.20 | 316i v 318i | PAKORA::EWOOTTON | | Thu Feb 27 1992 21:42 | 21 |
| I took delivery of my 318i last July and apart from wind noise comming from
the door mirrors I have been very pleased with it. My advice (if you
can afford it) is to go for the 318i instead of the 316i as the 316i
does not have an anti-roll bar fitted .
I will always remember my test drive at the dealers ( Morrisons of
Kirkaldy). The salesman drove us out to a large roundabout and
proceeded to take it at 65 mph the car never slid,shuddered nor did the
tyres (205x70) squeal.It stuck like the proverbial sh-t to a blanket.
The test vehical was a 318i and to be honest I doubt it the results
would have been the same if it been a 316i without an anti-roll bar.
It is very easy for someone to be critical comparing 320i/325i with a
316i. All vehicles are carrying the same 1.25 tonnes and a straight six
will always beat a straight four for transmitted engine noise.
Good luck with whatever your final choice may be.
regards,
Eric.
|
1678.21 | | YUPPY::FOX | wen balus go bugarup yu mas rausin fols tits | Wed Apr 29 1992 12:24 | 31 |
| Re: .4/.6 (regretting getting a Volvo 480)
Well, it might seem a bit petty, but BMW drivers will know what I mean
when I say that once you've driven a BMW, anything else pales in
comparison. I changed, because at the time my BMW lease expired the
new 3 Series wasn't available, and I decided to go for my second choice
of the Volvo (incidentally my third choice was a Discovery!).
Why have I regretted it, specifically?
1: Driving over 50mph, you can't hear Radio 4 on LW. Any radio
station on FM or LW difficult to hear unless volume turned right up =
distortion. Dealer agrees with me that it should be changed for a
better quality set. Volvo UK refuse.
2: Water. The rear window likes a bit of a leak now and again. The
spacesaver tyre regularly sits in a couple of inches of water.
3: Roadholding. Grip is less than satisfactory in the wet. I never
had any problems with my old 3 Series, despite everything that has been
said about them in this regard.
4: Build Quality. OK-ish, but far from BMW standards.
5: Servicing. Everyone thinks it is expensive to service a BMW until
they have a Volvo serviced. Fortunately, PHH picked/pick up the tab.
My last major service on the Volvo cost more than #130 over and above
the BMW cost, less than a year apart. If I was a private owner, I
wouldn't be very happy.
|
1678.22 | BMW standards not what they were? | NEWOA::SAXBY | Clever critters;Squirrels! | Wed Apr 29 1992 13:16 | 8 |
| � 4: Build Quality. OK-ish, but far from BMW standards.
Good job you didn't get a new 3 series then. By all accounts (numerous
sources, including TG last week) the new 3 series is very poorly bolted
together and (to quote Jeremy Clarkson) has Lada Samara quality plastic
trim!
Mark
|
1678.23 | *Anything* pales? | UTRTSC::BOSMAN | Market square hero's | Wed Apr 29 1992 15:48 | 14 |
| � Well, it might seem a bit petty, but BMW drivers will know what I mean
� when I say that once you've driven a BMW, anything else pales in
� comparison.
I've had an attractive BMW 316i (old version) but since then many other
cars. The last few years I have a Peugeot 405 SRi and surely don't want
to change. The Peugeot is much more comfortable, better performance
etc.
On the other hand, if the price wasn't a problem I would go for the new
coup�. But that should be because in the first place I'd like a coup�
and Peugeot didn't planned one for the 405 series.
Sjaak.
|
1678.24 | 316i!!!???? - why? | NZOMIS::TURRELL | nil et barstardum est vert il carborundum | Tue May 05 1992 04:11 | 5 |
| dont do it!!
spend the extra 1000 quid and get a 318i. 200cc and roll bar is worth
it!
|
1678.25 | Happy 316i driver and will be again | FILTON::SEARLE_A | | Fri Aug 21 1992 15:09 | 18 |
|
I used to have one of the old shape 316i's and was very pleased
with it. I have now just test driven a new 316i and think it is a far
nicer car inside, if not out, which is a matter of taste anyway. Also
the build quality on the new one I drove seemed a lot better than the
early new one I drove.
I also drove a new Audi 80 2 hours before and in comparison that
was very slow,ungainly and boring (yes I know 316i's are not fast). So
I will be rejoining the small band of happy 316i drivers again.
Alan
P.S. I agree once you've had a BMW your not happy until you get
another.
P.P.S. I think Jeremy Clarkson is a Pratt and everytime he comes on
Top gear I turn over.
|
1678.26 | | NEWOA::SAXBY | Born again reincarnationist | Fri Aug 21 1992 15:51 | 15 |
| � P.S. I agree once you've had a BMW your not happy until you get
� another.
Good to hear BMW have sorted out their quality control problems. Of
course, if you've never had a BMW it may be that you'd never want one!
:^)
� P.P.S. I think Jeremy Clarkson is a Pratt and everytime he comes on
� Top gear I turn over.
You may be right (he does go a bit overboard sometimes), but early new
style 3 series DID suffer from un-BMW quality. Clarkson was far from
alone in his criticism of the cars.
Mark
|
1678.27 | NOT WHAT I FOUND | BAHTAT::ANDERSON_E | its going to happen in kololi | Fri Aug 21 1992 18:12 | 8 |
| I had the old 318i and the current 316 is not a patch on it. This 316 is
slow (still after 16000 ml), to empty the ashtray, you have to put your
finger in the tray before it comes out. You cant see the end of the
boot or the front of the bonnet. I think its pretty claustrophobic (sp?).
As far as the new shape is concern, is it any different than the Nissan
Primera. Give me the old shape any day. You always KNEW it was a BMW.
Eddie
|
1678.28 | Opinionated feedback on 318is coupe | CHEFS::MARCHR | | Fri Aug 28 1992 19:32 | 24 |
| I have just got a 318is coupe, in preference to the 320i coupe. Mainly
because the 320 engine is a bit bland and it drinks petrol (I used to
have a 320 old shape and found it thirstier than the 325 I got
subsequently).
Handling seems good, although I find the power steering too light -
suppose I'll get used to it?! Someone said the new coupe was set up to
understeer, thereby suiting front-wheel drive converts. Ultimately for
really quick driving, understeer is better - grip coming off the front
means a transfer to the rear, allowing you to control the car with the
throttle rather than sawing away at the wheel.
However, I don't think this is what BMW had in mind when they set up
the geometry!
But comparing a Calibra with a BMW is a bit excessive. No proper
"sports car" can have front wheel drive - it's contradiction in terms!
Oh yes, the 318is has quite a loud engine note at 80-90 mph - could be
tiring on long trips to Warrington. I'll find out soon.
Rupert
|
1678.29 | | NEWOA::SAXBY | Frontal Lobotomies-R-Us | Tue Sep 01 1992 10:04 | 11 |
|
� But comparing a Calibra with a BMW is a bit excessive. No proper
� "sports car" can have front wheel drive - it's contradiction in terms!
Seemingly, with the demise of the Elan, this is one myth which
persists.
Mark
PS It stretches credulity to think of either the Calibra or the 3
series 2 door (I refuse to call it a coup�!) as a sports car.
|
1678.30 | BMW 325TD info | UTROP1::SCHUURMANS_H | | Tue Nov 17 1992 12:57 | 10 |
| Last week I ordered my BMW 325TD. It is due for delivery by the end of
next month.
I decided to lease this car after a 250 km drive. Guess I took the
right decision. It feels like a great car to drive (at least for the
250 km).
Anybody out there with (a lot) more experience re. this car (type)?
Thanks.
Hans
|
1678.31 | 318is on the road | YUPPY::PATEMAN | TOCA - Take Our Cocaine Abroad | Tue Nov 17 1992 14:52 | 7 |
| Took delivery of a 318is Coupe yesterday, and although I've only driven
from London to the suburbs so far, I'm impressed. Good build quality,
nice feel, very slick gearbox and pretty quiet.
Will put more in when I've done a few more miles.
Paul
|
1678.32 | | UTROP1::SIMPSON_D | I hate not breathing! | Mon Jan 11 1993 14:27 | 15 |
| I've had my new 318i for a month now and I'm well pleased. The base
model is a bit spare but once you've decided to pay that amount of
money it's not that hard to add a few options. I added M-series
suspension, 205x60s, sports seats, sports steering wheel, front fog
lights and rear spoiler.
I've done a few longish trips already (4+ hours) and I have to say that
it does exactly what BMW say it'll do - get you from point A to point B
with the minimum of fuss and feeling refreshed when you get there.
It's solid, relaxed at practically any speed, and the longer you have
it the more you appreciate the thought that's gone into the
engineering, things that aren't always immediately obvious.
If I had my druthers I might change the front fog lights for heated
wing mirrors, but not much else.
|
1678.33 | 318is Going Well | YUPPY::PATEMAN | Our Nige is Their Nige Now - Thank the Lord | Mon Jan 11 1993 14:34 | 13 |
| Like -1 I've now had my 318is for just on two months and done around
3500 miles. I'd also recommend it whole heartedly. It handles superbly,
the engine is very flexible and the ride is first class even with the
sports suspension. Build quality is excellent and all the controls feel
solid and fall naturally to hand. I'm getting 33-35 mpg on motorway
driving and around 30 in town.
1 minor niggle is the lack of a way of cutting out external air (fumes
in traffic etc) while keeping the heater going.
That apart, excellent.
Paul
|
1678.34 | Crikey - I must be using the wrong petrol! | CHEFS::MARCHR | | Mon Jan 11 1993 18:43 | 20 |
| Paul,
How do you get 33-35 mpg on the motorway? I have a 318is and only get
about 30 mpg at best. I cruise at 90 mph and tend to buy the cheapest
petrol and I try to drive economically (ie not flooring it all the
time). Around town I get about 28-29 mpg.
I ordered air conditioning on mine and it has a re-circulated air
switch. Ref your point on fumes etc.
However I must agree with you on the overall package. It really is a
very well thought out car. Handling is superb. Power steering is a
shade too light, but I've got used to it.
I'm glad I didn't go for the 320i Coupe. Apart from being much
thirstier, the engine is very flat compared to the 318is. The 3198is
loves revs and if you are not aware of this it will fool you into thinking
it's not the 140bhp engine it claims to be.
Rupert
|
1678.35 | | UTROP1::SIMPSON_D | I hate not breathing! | Tue Jan 12 1993 14:50 | 4 |
| I'm getting around 9.5 litres/100 kilometres (convert it yourself, but
it's better than 30mpg). That's a mix of everything from city driving
to 160kph+. I'm amazed at how economical it is at speed. But I don't
have airco (6,000+ guilders! You've got to be kidding!).
|
1678.36 | I'm bored | SIOG::KANE | The clot, thickens... | Tue Jan 12 1993 16:35 | 3 |
| Ahhh guilders, that takes me back...
I was at a place called, well pronounced, Sgravensand. Luvvly.
|
1678.37 | Check my maths! | CHEFS::MARCHR | | Tue Jan 12 1993 18:07 | 8 |
| Just a thought, does your 318is have a catalytic converter?
I know that effect economy.
Hang on, I've just worked out 9.5 lts/100kph - it comes to 30mpg,
roughly the same as me. I was beginning to worry....
Rupert
|
1678.38 | 30mpg! - you were lucky! | LISVAX::GRAY | | Thu Jan 14 1993 10:35 | 14 |
|
Relax guys - I'm only getting 11 ltrs /100 km on my new 318 (about
35mpg). I guess that's Lisbon driving - 160kph or 1st gear (not much in
between!)
I agree on your other comments - what a relief after 2 years with an
Alfa 75. The re-circulating air button is on mine since they all have
A/C in Portugal - it's very useful when you pass the the open sewers!
I've also discovered the pleasure of a quiet car with a CD player -
that wonderful Alfa engine note gets very tiresome on the motorway.
I've had 2 325's in the past so I notice a lack of power at the top
end, but not as much as I expected. The German build quality is as good
as ever - still no rattles after 2 months of Lisbon potholes.
John
|
1678.39 | Alfa has the soul - BMW the quality | YUPPY::PATEMAN | Our Nige is Their Nige Now - Thank the Lord | Thu Jan 14 1993 13:37 | 5 |
| Another Alfa refugee! My 318is follows a 75TS.The alfa felt more alive,
but its nice to know the car will still have the same bits on it when
you end a journey as when you started!
Paul
|
1678.40 | yes, but | WEOPON::LP12 | | Fri Jan 15 1993 21:43 | 12 |
| re: new 3 series
After having looked hard at a 325i coupe, I'd agree about the build
quality, but make the comment that the quality in the cabin is still
short of the mark for an expensive saloon. Mind you I find the 5 series
the same as well. Plastics a bit naff; that sort of thing...
Last week-end I did a tour of the dealers. Interesting sitting in the
Audo 100 2.8, a Merc 190 and a 325i coupe. The Audi has them both
beaten for quality (similiar value cars).
-Dave.
|
1678.41 | | UTROP1::SIMPSON_D | I *hate* not breathing! | Thu Jan 28 1993 12:58 | 1 |
| OK, how many of you have had your front and rear badges nicked?
|
1678.42 | re .1 serves you right!!! - The BMW hater returns | VANTEN::MITCHELLD | "Management is opaque" | Fri Jan 29 1993 10:43 | 0 |
1678.43 | re .-2 | VANTEN::MITCHELLD | "Management is opaque" | Fri Jan 29 1993 10:44 | 1 |
| If you dont have a rear badge i dont have to overtake you;-)))))
|
1678.44 | How is the skateboard ? | ESBS01::WATSON | STICK 1: A boomerang that doesn't work | Fri Jan 29 1993 11:01 | 3 |
| Hello Derek, welcome back.
Rik
|
1678.45 | | KERNEL::MCGOWAN | | Mon Feb 01 1993 13:18 | 3 |
| Yep - had the badge nicked on my current car (old shape 3 series)
Pete
|