T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1586.1 | All the folks, all the time. | NEWOA::SAXBY | Aye. When I were a lad.... | Thu Oct 31 1991 09:35 | 16 |
|
Just goes to show, doesn't it.
I never liked the old Astra, but the new one (particularly in 1.4 GSi
form) looked very impressive to me at Motorfair. Roomy, well equipped,
light and airy. As for it's external looks. To me it looks very like
the Honda Civic, which isn't bad looking.
I wouldn't have said either the Astra or the Escort were bad. They're
not inspiring, but they don't aim to be. This is Mr/Mrs Average
territory and you can't be too daring if you want to sell cars.
Now, if you want examples of retrograde styling take a peek at the
Celica!
Mark
|
1586.2 | Are you thinking of the 2.0 16v? | SHAWB1::HARRISC | Not very nice at all | Thu Oct 31 1991 10:13 | 5 |
| re -1
1.4 GSi... Is this true?
..Craig
|
1586.3 | It's what the man SAID! | NEWOA::SAXBY | Aye. When I were a lad.... | Thu Oct 31 1991 10:27 | 12 |
|
I think it was called a Gsi.
It was certainly a 1.4 fuel injected sporty version (well that's what
he said!). It had a 6 speaker stereo, air filter system for the
interior, 4 doors and sports type styling on the interior and exterior
trim.
When (if?) we get around to replacing Mandy's FIAT with something a bit
more sporting we'll be looking at this car very seriously.
Mark
|
1586.4 | | SHAWB1::HARRISC | Not very nice at all | Thu Oct 31 1991 10:59 | 7 |
| Yep thats the 1.4 Si, they also do a 1.6i version and a 2.0i SRi.
Personally I'm a bit disappointed with the looks of the S models,
they could have looked a lot better. As it is all the models look the
same (except of course for the GSi which looks superb!)..
..Craig
|
1586.5 | | NEWOA::SAXBY | Aye. When I were a lad.... | Thu Oct 31 1991 11:01 | 5 |
|
Ah, an Si, that's probably what he said. We saw a lot of cars in 3�
hours! I particularly liked the Mini Mazda 959 Frontera! :^)
Mark
|
1586.7 | Who could do worse? | WOTVAX::MEAKINS | Clive Meakins | Thu Oct 31 1991 13:26 | 5 |
| >>> RE.0. Nothing on gods earth looks as bad as the New Escort.
That's what I thought, until I saw the new Astra. What brought it home
was following one for a few miles. The back end is all wrong. Haven't
seen the hot hatch versions, these may be better.
|
1586.8 | | LARVAE::MUNSON_P | A dream within a dream | Fri Nov 01 1991 13:05 | 3 |
| IMHO the basic Astra's look like rounded Maestro's. Bleah!
(��)Munce.
|
1586.9 | Shame its 10 years behind the times | DOOZER::JENKINS | You want 'ken what? | Fri Nov 01 1991 15:54 | 7 |
|
re .8
� IMHO the basic Astra's look like rounded Maestro's. Bleah!
Great minds.... that's exactly what I thought too.
|
1586.10 | Following the leaders | VOGON::KAPPLER | but I manage ... | Fri Nov 01 1991 16:28 | 8 |
| But then GM haven't introduced any up to date styling for as long as I
can remember..........
Incidentally, why is it the arrogance of the phrase "Every car you'll
ever want" makes me determined to ignore all GM cars?
JK
|
1586.11 | | TASTY::JEFFERY | My God, It's full of stars! | Fri Nov 01 1991 18:10 | 7 |
| I'd say that if the Astra is "Every car you'll ever want", why do they
make the Nova, Cavalier & Carlton. And what the hell are they playing
at introducing the Frontera!
Astra will do that job guvnor.
Mark.
|
1586.12 | | NEWOA::ALFORD_J | an elephant is a mouse with an oper. sys. | Mon Nov 04 1991 09:07 | 4 |
| Re: .11
Well, the Nova is physically half the size....fits in smaller parking
spaces :-)
|
1586.13 | | LEECHS::hilton | How's it going royal ugly dudes? | Mon Nov 04 1991 09:46 | 4 |
| Best thing I like about the new Astra is the pollen vent, if this works
it would be a great feature for hay fever sufferers.
Greg
|
1586.14 | | LARVAE::CLEMENTS_D | | Mon Nov 04 1991 13:02 | 2 |
| There's nothing new under the sun..... had filtrers like that on a SAAB
**YEARS** ago.......
|
1586.15 | how do you think it compares? | SQGUK::LEVY | The Bloodhound | Mon Nov 04 1991 13:09 | 8 |
| All these comments are about styling. What's the car likely
to be like with regard to reliability and ease of servicing?
(Mr and Mrs Average concerns, and especially those of 2nd hand cars).
And on these, how's it likely to compare to the Citro�n ZX which
comes with very good styling (but possibly a low roof)?
Malcolm
|
1586.16 | | WELCLU::SHUTTLEWOOD | | Mon Nov 04 1991 14:26 | 11 |
| <<< Note 1586.14 by LARVAE::CLEMENTS_D >>>
> There's nothing new under the sun..... had filtrers like that on a SAAB
> **YEARS** ago.......
Ahh. There is a connection: GM own half of SAAB. Interesting to see
SAAB features such as the pollen filter and door strengthening bars
appearing in the Astra. Does the new Astra have seat belt tensioners as
well?
|
1586.17 | Yes they do... | STRIKR::LINDLEY | Strewth mate..... | Mon Nov 04 1991 14:40 | 1 |
|
|
1586.18 | But were they...... | UBOHUB::CROME_A | | Thu Nov 07 1991 17:29 | 11 |
| ahh !
but were the pollen filters standard on all the SAAB's ?
Cos they are on the Astra....
Andy
P.S. I didn't like the old astra, but that grew on me and I actually
started to like it - about last year. I hope it doesn't take as long for
this one to grow on me !
|
1586.19 | Estate | EEMELI::JMANNINEN | Iknowit'strue'causeIsawitonVT | Fri Nov 08 1991 07:27 | 4 |
| I've seen the new Opel Astra Estate (or Wagon or what_you_call_it) a
few times now and it looks much better than the hatch back.
- Jyri -
|
1586.20 | | LARVAE::CLEMENTS_D | | Fri Nov 08 1991 09:14 | 13 |
| re .18 ....
The filters were "standard" on all the 900's I had....... and they were
oart of the "standard" 9000 non-AC ventilation system. Don't know about
the 99's, though.
Very effective. I got a look at the black coating on one that was
replaced as part of the standard 12,000 mile service one time and was
almost sick at the black goo that forms part of road-side air. Ugh!
After that I had the filters replaced every 6,000 miles. The filter was
noticeably more clogged in spring (pollen) and late August (harvest
generated dust), though I guess if you live in a town you'd see a
different pattern........
|
1586.21 | More Human Friendly... | NEWOA::CROME_A | | Fri Nov 08 1991 10:38 | 12 |
| I notice that Vauxhall offer these "Pollen filters" as an option on
other models, I think it might be a good idea to get one fitted to the
Cavalier. I'd hate to think of all that "black gunge" ending up in my
lungs.
I think they cost about 18 quid, sounds like alot, but I wonder if
we engineers could get them paid for. After all we do spend a hell of a
lot of time in our cars, and all that "black gunge" aint doing us no
good !
Andy
|
1586.22 | I didn't know pollen could count ! | BELFST::FLANAGAN | Beware Radioactive Rhodedendrons! | Fri Nov 08 1991 12:52 | 7 |
| What happens when we arn't in our pollen catching equipped machines :-(
How about a sort of gas/pollen mask thing that is both functional and
rather cool/hip looking to wear into the office everyday, outside and
even in the bath :-)
Gary.
|
1586.23 | | NOT003::BAGNALL | | Tue Jan 07 1992 11:48 | 15 |
| I ordered one of the new Astra GSis through the lease scheme, based
on the spec and a limited test drive, compared to other cars I was
considering it seemed a reasonable deal. Availablity was pretty
good, approximately 1 month from order.
The garage tried to deliver it this morning - I couldn't accept
it due to the number of faults it had which seem to have got round
the PDI. To be fair, these appear to be due to some electrical
fault. Not the best start with a new car, but maybe the garage
should be taking responsiblity for the problems - they have agreed
to pay the call out charge for the mobile phone man who was waiting
to transfer the phone...
So I can't post a review of the new Astra!
|
1586.24 | | SHAWB1::HARRISC | Have YOU wiped properly? | Tue Jan 07 1992 12:41 | 3 |
| How much was you quoted? If you don't mind me asking of course 8-)
..Craig
|
1586.25 | | KERNEL::LOAT | Bored...bored........BORED!!!! | Tue Jan 07 1992 17:09 | 8 |
| For anyone who's interested, there are a lot of prices for the new
Astras in the preferred car list at the moment.
Prices range from -�83 for the Astra 1.7D LS estate, to �1669
for the Astra 2.0i 16v hatchback.
Steve.
|
1586.26 | Anybody actually got one ???? | EAYV01::MONTGOMERIE | | Thu Jan 16 1992 13:13 | 14 |
| Nevermind any of this title tattle about shape and pollen filters,
has anybody out there aactually bought or leased one ?
How are they finding it ?
Whats the real fuel consumption like ( not the quoted urban,75mph
stuff ) ?
Any and all inputs greatfully received.
Gordon M.
P.S. I'm going for a test drive in a demonstrator thats up for
sale at a local garage at the weekend.
|
1586.27 | we had one for a week! | VOGON::MITCHELLE | Beware of the green meanie | Tue Jan 28 1992 16:35 | 31 |
|
We just had one of the basic model 1.4l ones as a hire car.......
I can't compare it for power against it's imediate rivals, since I
normally drive a 2l car, so found 1.4lites seriously underpowered when
trying to argue it out with the Mercs on the Autobahn!
It would sit quite happily at 130Kph (note the _k_!) but would take a
while to get there. It seems quite stable in a straight line, but this
is at the expense of very heavy steering. Parking and manoevering could
be hard work (no PAS on this model). Handling - seemed to behave
predictably on snow, and cornered OK at the speeds I was doing, which
was no where neer the limits of the car, due to the road conditions.
The controls seem reasonably
logical, but the radio/cassette lights were very bright at night (there
may have been a way to turn them down, but I didn't look for it!) There
was no rev counter. The engine was very quiet. Gerabox - very big jump
between 3rd and 4th. Visibility was quite reasonable. I'm really glad
we weren't given one of the older Astras. The drivers seat was
comfortable, (even after driving from Frankfurt to Calais!) but I would
prefer more side support. Luggage space was ok for two people + ski
gear! with the seats folded down.
One very annoying feature was the interior light - it is in the middle
(above the rear view mirror) and very bright, which was a problem for
the driver when the passenger wanted to look at the map for night
navigation!
General verdict - for the basic 1.4, boring! -
|
1586.28 | The new GSi | NOT002::BAGNALL | | Wed Feb 05 1992 09:27 | 24 |
| I've had the GSi for four weeks now, done about 3,000 miles.
When is is going OK it is a great car to drive, the ETC is a bit
disconserting at times, but can be switched off. The car has every
imaginable goodie and that is probably why I have had so many problems.
Since it was delivered there have been a number of faults, mainly
electrical - one exception was a leaking/missing sump gasket.
Fortunately the sensor system picked up the lack of oil quickly...
The Hertz engineer saw it yesterday, and agrees it will probably
have to be replaced with another due to the continuing faults.
He tells me there are a couple of known design faults (don't know
if these apply to all the models) - wiper motor fails on one speed
within 1000 miles fom new, petrol flap permanently locks and has to
be opened from inside the boot.
Fuel consumption seems pretty good, about 35 mpg on motorway, about
28-32 mpg in town. Security system on the car is impressive, (if
complicated!) with deadlocks and alarm fitted as standard.
If anyone wants to talk at length, mail me or phone on 778 3073
Hilary
|
1586.29 | Sounds like a joke is coming... | KURMA::IJOHNSTON | | Wed Feb 05 1992 09:37 | 1 |
| Whats an ETC??
|
1586.30 | | TASTY::JEFFERY | You get surface noise in real life! | Wed Feb 05 1992 09:45 | 13 |
| From what I've read, ETC stands for Electronic Traction Control.
This device cuts the power if it feels the wheels slipping. This
apparently happens just as often as it did in the old GTE.
The result of this, is that the power may cut off mid corner, or
be reapplied mid-corner without warning.
You say that ETC can be switched off. If you do, does it stay switched
off, or do you have to explicitly switch it off, each time you start the
car??
Mark.
|
1586.31 | from the brochure... | NEWOA::ALFORD_J | The intermission fish... | Wed Feb 05 1992 09:52 | 23 |
|
> Whats an ETC??
Electronic Traction Control
"ETC has a dynamic influence on the handling characteristics expected of a
sports car"
"Primarily, ETC adds extra safety margins while allowing the car's performance
to be keenly exploited. It comes into effect when accelerating, cornering,
overtaking and hill climbing - all situations where too-exuberant use of the
throttle could produce undesirable consequences. It has another valuable plus
too, in alerting to slippery surfaces."
"ETC cleans up the driving line automatically without the driver having to take
any other consious action. It works through the ABS brake sensors monitoring
wheel revolutions, with data being fed to an ETC control unit.
"The instant any discrepancy of wheel revolutions is recorded, the separate ETC
throttle cuts in, automatically adjusting engine torque to optimum power levels
for maximum grip, even though the main throttle may be wide open."
|
1586.32 | | NEWOA::ALFORD_J | The intermission fish... | Wed Feb 05 1992 09:53 | 8 |
| Re: .30
>You say that ETC can be switched off. If you do, does it stay switched
>off, or do you have to explicitly switch it off, each time you start the
>car??
Nope, it comes on automatically when you switch the engine on. You have to
manually switch it off every time.
|
1586.33 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Don't rate 'em meself | Wed Feb 05 1992 10:18 | 4 |
| I don't like the sound of the at all... I'd much rather retain full
control of a car myself...
Laurie.
|
1586.34 | Astra Swiss-style | BERN04::BYRNE | | Tue Feb 11 1992 07:25 | 20 |
| We bought the new Astra in Nov 91. Its supplied by OPEL here in
Switzerland and sofar we're very happy with it. Apart from the fact
that it is Cosmos Blue it looks quite good but I think that we have a
hatchback as standard here in Switzerland.
Petrol consumption 5l per 100 km (Leadfree/Motorway)
So far we have done about 6000km and have had no major problems. We
didhaveto bring the car back to the garage because the heat wasn't
working properly and one of the doors went "BOING". It turned out to be
carelessness at production.
It handles very well on the snow with winter tyres of course !!! And
temperatures of -14�C are no problem when starting.
Another advantage - at 4 foot 11 inches its hard to find a car where I
can reachthe pedals without burning out the clutch. The Astra just
makes it.
Therese
|
1586.35 | 1.7 DT | SAC::LANG_H | Button up your overcoat | Fri Dec 18 1992 10:26 | 6 |
| Has anybody driven the GLS 1.7 Diesel Turbo at all; and if so, any
comments?
Rgds
Harvey
|
1586.36 | | BERN02::BYRNE | | Mon Jan 04 1993 07:51 | 5 |
| Received a letter before Christmas recalling Astra bought in Nov 91 -
faulty wiring.
So thats why the battery light and others lit up when the oil was low
!!
|
1586.37 | Diesel estates? | PEKING::GERRYT | | Fri Jan 08 1993 13:25 | 6 |
| I'm considering the Diesel Estate on the car-scheme here in the UK.
Has anyone driven the turbo-diesel or non-turbo versions and done a
comparison...ie. is the turbo worth the extra money?
Tim
|
1586.38 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Fault tolerance is for machines | Fri Jan 08 1993 16:04 | 6 |
| I don't know about the Astra, but on the Peugeot 405 estate the Turbo
transforms the car. I wouldn't consider doing without one. You may not
expect the same performance that I do, all I can suggest is that you
drive one of each type.
Laurie.
|
1586.39 | Automatic Transmission | OHNO::CASSELLS | Same again, barsteward | Mon Feb 21 1994 13:20 | 14 |
| I've just collected a new hire-car Astra 1.6i from Holland. As usual
with this hire company there is no manual for the car, and even
if there was a manual I wouln't be able to read it since it would
probably be in Dutch.
My question concerns the automatic transmission. There is a button
next to the gear selection lever with a snowflake symbol on it.
Anybody know what it does? My assumption is it locks into 2nd gear
when pulling away. Since there is currently a snow storm here in
Brussels I don't particularly think this is the best time to
'suck it and see' but I do wan't to get home tonight (or at least
as far as the pub).
Mike.
|
1586.40 | | PEKING::ATKINSA | PRC Vauxman. | Mon Feb 21 1994 13:39 | 9 |
|
My uncle has the same snow flake thingy in his Senator,it's for extra
traction in such conditions as snow and believe he mentioned using it
for towing.
Andy..
|
1586.41 | Smooth but Slow | LARVAE::MELTON_D | | Mon Feb 21 1994 17:01 | 8 |
|
It locks the transmission in 3rd gear, giving a super-smooth getaway
with minimal risk of breaking traction on a slippery surface. It
disengages itself when a certain road speed (30mph?) is reached. Using
it for towing doesn't seem like a good idea.
Dave M.
|
1586.42 | | KERNEL::WITHALLG | Wait Till They Getta Loada Me | Wed Mar 16 1994 12:39 | 15 |
|
Thats the ATC button. (Auto Traction Control). **I think**
It compensates for wheel spin should one wheel or more spin on
something slippery !.
You can turn it off by pressing the button and the symbol illuminates
on the dash. This is for driving on snow etc.....
(Printed without permission from what I remember reading in the 16i
Handbook)
Gary
|
1586.43 | Don't touch that button! | KIRKTN::BHAILE | | Wed Mar 16 1994 13:06 | 2 |
| Isn't that button the ejector seat? I wouldn't touch it if I were you.
(especially if the sun roof is closed!!!!) :-)
|
1586.44 | errrr not quite ! | NEWOA::CROME_A | | Thu Mar 17 1994 14:26 | 4 |
| The button with the snowflake on the automatic does not feature any type of
traction control, its only the higher power GSi with has the traction control.
Andy
|
1586.45 | | KERNEL::WITHALLG | Wait Till They Getta Loada Me | Thu Mar 17 1994 15:13 | 5 |
| -1
well it should do.
Gary
|
1586.46 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Thats all I have to say about that | Tue Jan 30 1996 10:08 | 13 |
| An update on the Astra range. After speaking to Wadham Kenning about
model availability they told me the following models have been deleted
due to lack of demand but there are still manyin stock -
Astra Sport Turbo diesel
1.8 16v
" CDX Turbo diesel
The remaining Sport models will be the 1.6 and a new 2.0 16v model.
Has anyone else heard about a 2 litre Sport as this is news to me.
Royston
|
1586.47 | | COMICS::WEGG | Some hard boiled eggs and some nuts. | Tue Jan 30 1996 10:33 | 6 |
| � Has anyone else heard about a 2 litre Sport as this is news to me.
They appeared in VTX last thursday together with the 1.4i 16v
and the special edition convertibles. "Prices available soon".
Ian.
|
1586.48 | I (hope) I've got one. | COMICS::FLANDERSD | Pas de deux - Father of twins ! | Wed Jan 31 1996 08:05 | 10 |
|
Re .46
I had ordered the CDX turbo diesel estate, and it's taken LeasePlan 2 days to
find me one for (I hope) delivery next month. (They say it's in a field
somewhere so I hope the pre-delivery is _very_ thorough).
I'll let you know how I get on.
Dave
|
1586.49 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Thats all I have to say about that | Wed Jan 31 1996 09:19 | 5 |
| Dave, If you want the real story phone Wadham Kenning (speak to Peter
or Lindsay in Fleet sales). Its likely they will organise delivery and
will keep you updated of delivery dates availability etc.
Royston
|
1586.50 | | COLA1::CADAMSON | [email protected] | Thu Jun 13 1996 13:58 | 14 |
| A quick question for all you auto drivers out there......
I have recently taken delivery of my new vehicle - an automatic.
I was wondering if it is best to leave the car in Drive when stopped (at
traffic lights for example) (with foot on the brake) or move it to neutral
while stopped and then select drive again once the traffic is moving or does
it really not make any difference?
Cheers,
Craig.
|
1586.51 | I vote neutral | KERNEL::PARRY | Trevor Parry | Thu Jun 13 1996 15:14 | 8 |
| If I'm going to be stopped for more than a few seconds I slide it to
Neutral. My reasons for doing so are 1) if my foot slips off the brake
I don't run into anything and 2) the car is alway straining to move
when in drive so I figured it must use more petrol than if it were
idling in neutral.
Regards,
tmp
|
1586.52 | | TGRAPH::WEGG | Some hard boiled eggs and some nuts. | Thu Jun 13 1996 15:30 | 10 |
| Craig,
I don't know the answer to your qustion, but I'd be interested
in your opion of the Astra automatic, especially with regards
to performance and overtaking ability.
I've been waiting for Vauxhall to get me an Astra 1.6 LS Auto
for test, which engine do you have?
Ian.
|
1586.53 | Not a vauxhall | COLA1::CADAMSON | [email protected] | Thu Jun 13 1996 15:47 | 9 |
| Hi Ian,
Sorry that I lulled you into thinking it was one of these Leaseplan deals.
The car is my own private one and is not a Vauxhall.
Cheers,
craig.
|
1586.54 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Don't get mad, get even. | Thu Jun 13 1996 16:25 | 5 |
| >and is not a Vauxhall.
Errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, so why is it in the 'Astra' topic for cri'sakes ?
Royston
|
1586.55 | To | WOTVAX::BARRETTR | | Thu Jun 13 1996 16:48 | 10 |
| re .54
Royston,
He's probably trying to brighten up the Astra note since the new Astras
are so dull !! Afterall an automatic anything is better ;-)
Rick Barrett
|
1586.56 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Cyclops no more! | Thu Jun 13 1996 17:16 | 7 |
| Call me old-fashioned, but I think that cars when stationary should be
put into neutral and the handbrake applied. I realise that these days
hardly anyone bothers, but there, I still do it. Besides, I hate
sitting behind some git with his foot on the brake dazzling the hell
out of me.
Laurie.
|
1586.57 | | TGRAPH::WEGG | Some hard boiled eggs and some nuts. | Fri Jun 14 1996 10:01 | 12 |
| � He's probably trying to brighten up the Astra note since the new Astras
� are so dull !! Afterall an automatic anything is better ;-)
As someone about to have a Peugeot 405 Estate dragged off him
I can do without this sort of reminder. :-( I'm hoping an
automatic box might in some way compensate.
Anyway, my enquiry still stands. If anyone out there has an ASTRA
automatic I'd be interested in your views. Reply here or in the
cherished number plates topic, I'll find it.
Ian.
|
1586.58 | | COLA1::CADAMSON | [email protected] | Fri Jun 14 1996 10:03 | 6 |
| I didn't mean for it to be in the New Astra topic.
When I added the note it actually said it had added it to a completely
different conference MS-EXCHANGE!
|
1586.59 | automatic neutral position? | CHEFS::SURPLICEK | | Wed Jun 19 1996 14:19 | 10 |
| And a supplementary question:
Why do automatic cars shift neutral <-> reverse <-> forward?
This means a double clunk if you do choose to pause in neutral, and not
blind the unfortunates behind you. Maybe it is because american
culture is to only use neutral when parking, and parking is only
executed in forward. Clues? - Ken
|
1586.61 | | COLA1::CADAMSON | [email protected] | Wed Jun 19 1996 14:33 | 5 |
| Mine has Drive - Neutral - Reverse - Park (but as we already know, mine is
not an astra :--))) (Sorry Royston, couldn't resist!)
Craig
|
1586.62 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Don't get mad, get even. | Wed Jun 19 1996 15:05 | 10 |
| > couldn't resist!
You're stealing Malcolm's line.
All auto's I've driven have Drive next to Neutral. This makes it easy
to slot in and out of gear when at hold ups.
Royston
|
1586.63 | ...there may be exceptions, but... | CMOTEC::JASPER | Stuck on the Flypaper of Life | Fri Jun 28 1996 14:08 | 12 |
| ...Are you confusing Neutral with Park ???
As far as I know, all cars conform to Low-Drive-Neutral-Reverse-Park,
so you would not need to go through reverse to get neutral. My guess is
that Park is stuck up one end on its own for simplicity, ie you push the
lever forward as far as it will go before you get out.
The down-side of this layout is that drivers may be reluctant to select
Park at red lights etc., hence Lauries comment about brake lights. In
fact American cars I have driven recently dont even have a handbrake.
Tony.
|
1586.64 | Mileometer problem. | TGRAPH::WEGG | Some hard boiled eggs and some nuts. | Fri Aug 16 1996 10:17 | 10 |
| I've had my new Astra (1.6 LS Estate) for 2 weeks now, and I've
noticed that the mileometer is not accurate. Every car I've had to
date has recorded 26 miles exactly between my home and work, but
the Astra makes it only 24�.
This means in a year it will under-record 1200 miles, and unless
I compensate will cost me 50p per 100 miles of business travel.
Has anyone else noticed the same problem?
Ian.
|
1586.65 | Become a Surveyor | SEDSWS::BOND | Its grim up North | Fri Aug 16 1996 10:49 | 6 |
| Car mags , as part of their road test on new models , used to report
the accuracy of the Speedo and Mileometer. It was ALWAYS inaccurate
and over what the calibrated instruments read, by a few percent.
One way to check your Speedo and Mileometer is by using the posts
and emergency phones on motorways as reference points.
|
1586.66 | | IOSG::LOCKWOOD | Do you like our owl? | Fri Aug 16 1996 11:45 | 5 |
|
Just compensate for company trip and smile when you sell it and
report the mileage :-)
Pete$notveryhonestonFridays :-)
|
1586.67 | Re .65 | TGRAPH::WEGG | Some hard boiled eggs and some nuts. | Fri Aug 16 1996 13:15 | 14 |
| � Car mags , as part of their road test on new models , used to report
� the accuracy of the Speedo and Mileometer. It was ALWAYS inaccurate
� and over what the calibrated instruments read, by a few percent.
Yes, I remembered that ... that's why I haven't discounted the
possibilty that all my previous cars have over-read, and the
Astra is deadly accurate.
� One way to check your Speedo and Mileometer is by using the posts
� and emergency phones on motorways as reference points.
Good idea, that will confirm it. I'll check it and report back.
Ian.
|
1586.68 | Whats the problem anyway ? | WOTVAX::16.194.208.3::sharkeya | The older I get, the better I was | Fri Aug 16 1996 13:27 | 6 |
| Put down the mileage you think is correct on your expenses. DEC pay you
for the miles you travel, not what an inaccurate mileometer thinks it
should be.
Alan
|
1586.69 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Don't get mad, get even. | Fri Aug 16 1996 13:47 | 5 |
| > mileage you think is correct
I'm sure there are many 'creative' thinkers out there.
Royston
|
1586.70 | | TGRAPH::WEGG | Some hard boiled eggs and some nuts. | Fri Aug 16 1996 14:05 | 11 |
| As I never do more than 500 business miles per year anyway
I'm not that concerned about the expenses aspect, I just
entered the note as an observation. It's a bit worrying
though that the car will possibly have done 3600 miles more
than the clock show in three years time.
As a side issue, I received a speeding ticket the first week
I had the car. If I can prove the speedo also under-reads,
is that an adequate defence?
Ian.
|
1586.71 | Wat would you expect for 670,000 GBP | HIPS::WATSON | Not the one. | Fri Aug 16 1996 14:15 | 11 |
| >> Car mags , as part of their road test on new models , used to report
>> the accuracy of the Speedo and Mileometer. It was ALWAYS inaccurate
>> and over what the calibrated instruments read, by a few percent.
Not quite, apparently the McLaren F1 is spot on all the way up to 230
(though the mags could only verify this to 205'ish). Ithe spedo is
programmed to compensate for the variation in tyre diameter caused by
the high centrigual force of driving at > 200 mph.
Rik
|
1586.72 | 10% error allowed I think.....but don't quote me ! *8-) | RDGENG::WILKINS | | Fri Aug 16 1996 14:26 | 19 |
| Re: .70
Nope...I recall reading somewhere that the inaccuracies of
spedometers are taken account of when motorists are stopped
for speeding.
I think the tolerance is something like 10%....therefore
I don't think you'd be prosecuted for 33mph in a 30mph limit,
55 in a 50, 66 in a 60 and 77 in a 70.
Obviously these speeds are all as compared to the calibrated
speed measuring device in the police vehicle..be that speedo,
radar, VASCAR etc.
You may still be stopped and advised though...
OK...all the exceptions to this can now dispell my BS *8-)
Kevin.
|
1586.73 | | COMICS::CORNEJ | What's an Architect? | Fri Aug 16 1996 16:11 | 8 |
| re .70,
I guess you were missing the audio feedback from the TD in the pug :-)
...but m'lud, it didn't sound like 90....
Jc
|
1586.74 | Rolling Road ? | GTJAIL::MARTIN | Out to Lunch | Fri Aug 16 1996 22:33 | 3 |
| Might be worth getting a dealer to check. I think the gearbox has a
different size cog depending on which model / tyre size etc. I seem to
remember a case like this where they had fitted the wrong part.
|
1586.75 | Work it out man! | MUGGER::WILLIAMSH | Huw Williams Digital Warrington | Tue Aug 20 1996 13:39 | 21 |
| The suggestion about motorway markers is a good one.
They are 100m apart. So drive at exactly 120 Km/h
(speedos usually have Km/h written in small green letters)
start your stopwatch by a marker and then count 20 markers,
stop the stopwatch at the 20th marker. It should read exactly
one minute.
If say your stopwatch says 66 seconds, then you have an error of
(66 - 60) / 60 * 100 = +10%
Rgds,
Huw.
P.S. I've seen cars with optimistic speedometer speed readings
but spot on mileometer readings. There isn't necessarily
a correleation between one and the other. There is a section of
the A5 in wales which still has every milestone for about 15 miles.
If you're a local (like me) and know in which hedge to look, you can
test the accuracy of mileometers.
|
1586.76 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Don't get mad, get even. | Tue Aug 20 1996 13:46 | 9 |
| >motorway markers ... They are 100m apart.
What about checking the mileage against the motorway phones which are
situated every mile ?
I was thinking about checking my new car in this way but was wondering
"am I really that sad ?".
Royston
|
1586.77 | | FORTY2::PALKA | | Tue Aug 20 1996 14:56 | 7 |
| The motorway markers are not necessarily very accurate. However there
are 'measured mile' markers at a number of places. These should be
accurate enough, although one mile is not really long enough. I suspect
these markers are used to check police speedometers (I can't think what
else they would be for).
Andrew
|
1586.78 | :-) | COMICS::CORNEJ | What's an Architect? | Tue Aug 20 1996 15:02 | 6 |
| ...used to check police speedometers...
But by definition these are always correct
Jc
|
1586.79 | Speedo checking service. | TERRI::SIMON | Semper in Excernere | Tue Aug 20 1996 15:16 | 15 |
| I can do a speedo checking service. I will check your speedo
for a modest fee as we drive to the pub :-).
I have checked a couple of cars and checked the checker
against another checker. Both checking units show the
same reading and are very accurate indeed, down to .1
MPH. As long as you can hold the car at a constant speed
there are no problems.
Phone me on 830 3122 or mail to above.
This checking DOES NOT involve any attachments or changes
to you car.
Simon
|
1586.80 | | WOTVAX::STONEG | Temperature Drop in Downtime Winterland.... | Tue Aug 20 1996 15:57 | 6 |
|
What's this then, drive past the nearest 30mph GATSO at an indicated
50mph, any under or or over reading will be notified by post %^)
Graham
|
1586.81 | | HIPS::WATSON | Not the one. | Tue Aug 20 1996 17:17 | 6 |
| Is this constant speed 0 mph ?
If so my car will fail as I'd don't register for speed less than 10mph
(or more that 160)
Rik
|
1586.82 | | TERRI::SIMON | Semper in Excernere | Wed Aug 21 1996 10:02 | 7 |
| Any speed.
What I actually have is a 10 channel parallel (sp?) GPS
(Global Positioning System). So if anyone does indeed
want a check I will gladly do it.
Simon
|
1586.83 | | HIPS::WATSON | Not the one. | Wed Aug 21 1996 10:10 | 8 |
| What is the accuracy of GPS tech. these days ? I thought that the US
milirary (who own the sat.s) deliberaly introduce jitter into the
LSB(s) ao that the accuracy was not as good as technically possible.
This would stop the enemy using the US sat.s to mount an attack. If the
good guys decided to attach then they could set the LSB(s) to be
accurate.
Rik
|
1586.84 | Yellow phone spotter | COMICS::SHELLEY | Don't get mad, get even. | Wed Aug 21 1996 11:00 | 11 |
| re .76 >"am I really that sad ?".
Yes.
I checked the distance between the phones on the M3 last night in the
Astra and was surprised to note that I only recorded 9.5 tenths of a
mile.
It seems I have a similar problem to Ian.
Royston (Mr Saddo)
|
1586.85 | | BPSOF::BROWN | Chris Brown | Wed Aug 21 1996 17:31 | 8 |
| There is a measured mile on the A33 dual carriageway just South of Dec
Park Reading. Look for 4 round markers with red quadrants on a yellow
background. These are about 5" diameter a couple of feet off the
ground and a few feet from the edge of the road.
I suppose you've already checked that your tyres at not at 100 psi?
C
|
1586.86 | http://satnav.atc.ll.mit.edu/gps/images/gps-scat.gif | TERRI::SIMON | Semper in Excernere | Thu Aug 22 1996 09:48 | 14 |
| � What is the accuracy of GPS tech. these days ? I thought that the US
� milirary (who own the sat.s) deliberaly introduce jitter into the
� LSB(s) ao that the accuracy was not as good as technically possible.
� This would stop the enemy using the US sat.s to mount an attack. If the
� good guys decided to attach then they could set the LSB(s) to be
� accurate.
Usually the accuracy is about 50m but can be up to 100m out. Speed is not
effected by Selective Availability (SA) as the error induced is stable.
Without SA mine should be accurate to 15m RMS or better.
Well what do you expect for a �520 bit of kit.
Simon$broke
|
1586.87 | | HIPS::WATSON | Not the one. | Thu Aug 22 1996 12:42 | 3 |
| Thanks for the pointer.
Rik
|
1586.88 | warning | WOTVAX::16.194.208.3::sharkeya | The older I get, the better I was | Fri Aug 23 1996 00:07 | 8 |
| Be careful - most insurances exclude 'pace making' - ie using the car
to pace others (or your own).
So don't own up to 'I was just checking the speedo against mile
markers' when caught somewhere !
Alan
|
1586.89 | | BPSOF::BROWN | Chris Brown | Fri Aug 23 1996 10:45 | 8 |
| Re .88
that could be said if you were checking speed, but I doubt it holds
true for checking distance recording, where you do not have to hold a
constant speed despite changing road/traffic conditions.
C
|
1586.90 | | WOTVAX::DODD | | Fri Aug 23 1996 13:59 | 7 |
| re checking with GPS
Surely this can only work if you travel in a straight line? If it is
taking time to travel between two readings GPS, or your gadget has to
assume ATCF?
Andrew
|
1586.91 | | TERRI::SIMON | Semper in Excernere | Fri Aug 23 1996 14:34 | 7 |
| ATCF?
What is ATCF.
With 20 second averaging bends don't make much difference, if any.
It can also be set to 2 minute averaging.
Simon
|
1586.92 | | WOTVAX::DODD | | Fri Aug 23 1996 14:40 | 7 |
|
I made it up - As The Crow Flies
20 seconds is 1/3 mile at 60 so on a motorway or similar I'll agree.
Checkig 30 mph in a built up area might be significant.
Andrew
|
1586.93 | Central Locking on the Astra. | GEOFFN::BARKERA | | Tue Sep 03 1996 14:34 | 13 |
| Hi,
Does anyone know if, on an Astra Sport, whether the central locking
should be able to be unlocked from the hatch back, rather than just the
[front] passenger doors?
What model in the range, if any, has this facility?
I'm just wondering whether my car should be able to this.
Thanks,
AL.
|
1586.94 | | FORTY2::PALKA | | Tue Sep 03 1996 14:39 | 8 |
| re .93
I dont know about the Astra, but on most cars the central locking is
only controlled from the drivers door (or the driver and front
passenger doors). It is unusual for the central locking to be
controlled from the rear doors or tailgate.
Andrew
|
1586.95 | Hmmmmm? | GEOFFN::BARKERA | | Tue Sep 03 1996 15:22 | 12 |
| re .94
Someone I know had a Renault 21, and I think you could unlock the
central locking from the boot.
The manual for the car, in my opinion, seems to imply that you can
unlock the car from the hatch, but trying it it doesn't work.
If someone has read the section I'm talking about please
agree/disagree.
Al.
|
1586.96 | possible equivalent? | IOSG::TYLDESLEY | | Tue Sep 03 1996 15:57 | 8 |
| Oldish Cavalier SRi - the central locking unlocks from the tailgate,
providing that it has either been locked from the tailgate, or locked
to the 'first' locking point at one of the front doors. If, however, it
is locked to 'second' position at one of the front doors (i.e. the
deadlock and alarm are set), then it cannot be unlocked from the
tailgate.
HTH.
DaveT
|
1586.97 | Quick answer...nope ! | RDGENG::WILKINS | | Tue Sep 03 1996 16:58 | 15 |
| Hi,
On my Astra Sport the central locking can only be activated
from the drivers door lock.
The hatch can be unlocked seperately and can also be left
in the "open" state independantly of the central locking
mechanism.
I don't recall the manual inferring that the central locking
can be operated from the hatch...but I haven't re-read it
for quite a while *;-)
HTH,
Kevin.
|
1586.98 | Cheers Kev! | GEOFFN::BARKERA | | Tue Sep 03 1996 17:09 | 15 |
| re: .97
Unlocking and opening the hatch seperately from the rest of the car is
exactly what I can't do.
You said you can leave, 'it in the "open" state...' Does that mean you
can open and close the hatch, yet the doors of the car are locked?
So, it does sound like the car may have a problem.
Thanks for your input Kevin.
Cheers,
Alan.
|
1586.99 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Don't get mad, get even. | Tue Sep 03 1996 17:17 | 11 |
| Alan
Check out if there is a difference between just locking the car at the
driver's door and 'deadlocking' it.
It may me that the deadlock position is preventing you unlocking the
boot.
I'll check this out on my Astra estate this evening.
Royston
|
1586.100 | SNARF! | PLAYER::BROWNL | I did have a holiday... Didn't I? | Tue Sep 03 1996 18:47 | 1 |
|
|
1586.101 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Don't get mad, get even. | Wed Sep 04 1996 08:27 | 14 |
| Alan,
I checked out the lock on the tailgate of my Astra estate and
you are able to unlock it and open it even when the car is deadlocked
by the drivers door. However, it can't be left in an unlocked state.
To unlock it turn the key clockwise as far as it will go and push the
key (and the button) in. This will open the tailgate. You will
need to return the key to the original position to remove it. This
leaves the tailgate locked.
HTH,
Royston
|
1586.102 | Saved from the torment!! | GEOFFN::BARKERA | | Wed Sep 04 1996 10:10 | 14 |
| Royston,
Tried what you suggested yesterday, last night on leaving work.
I couldn't get the thing to open.
But, reading your note this morning, the bit I was failing to do was
pushing the key *and* the button in. I'm used to a car where you turn
the key, remove it, and then press the button.
Thanks for the responses, you've put my mind at rest.
Cheers,
Alan.
|
1586.103 | | CHEFS::FIDDLER_M | The sense of being dulls my mind | Wed Dec 04 1996 08:29 | 8 |
1586.104 | S'allright for me | CHEFS::MCGINTYJ | | Wed Dec 04 1996 08:51 | 28 |
1586.105 | reliable but boring | HLFS00::BOSHUIJER_F | Frits Boshuijer | Wed Dec 04 1996 13:44 | 17 |
1586.106 | not bad | WOTVAX::BRUCEA | | Fri Dec 06 1996 13:55 | 11
|