T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1524.1 | I'm not sure I disagree with this one..... | CEEOSI::MCCABE | | Tue Aug 06 1991 17:21 | 10 |
|
At the moment I have a lot more than 1mm of thread on the front tyres of
a fiesta, and do not intend to leave them on past the end of this week. In
wet weather I find that traction is very poor indeed. I don't beleive
that I have ever driven a car with thread down to the statutary minimum, but
I should imagine on anything more than a damp motorway it would be deadly.
For once I think I agree with the legislators here....
Terry
|
1524.2 | | KETJE::SHASTA::RUTTER | I'm Back 'Ome in September | Tue Aug 06 1991 17:41 | 15 |
| � If I was a tire manufacturer who supplied the standard 15mm new tyre
� It is sickening to know that these tyre manufactures **could** double
� the life of a tyre without affecting the stability of the vehicle
Do you really think that a tyre of present construction with double
the tread depth would be as stable as one with 15mm ?
Just imagine those tread blocks squirming whenever you turn the
wheel or use the brakes.
J.R.
PS Having said that, I am sure that *some* increase in tread depth
could be managed quite safely, but it's a captive market - of sorts.
|
1524.3 | Is it already illegal ? | CHEST::LEECH | IBOS - Morgue division ! | Tue Aug 06 1991 18:41 | 8 |
| � At the moment I have a lot more than 1mm of thread on the front tyres of
� a fiesta, and do not intend to leave them on past the end of this week.
I thought the current limit was 2mm already ?
Shaun.
|
1524.5 | A potential rip-off! | IRNBRU::WILSON | | Wed Aug 07 1991 12:06 | 24 |
|
Yes, it would be impossible to drive on 30mm of tread, but they 'could'
increase the new tread level by 2mm, thereby ensuring that the user
still gets the same value for money.......but will they???
* Min tread level in the UK, is still 1mm.
The reason I mentioned this note, is because I just forked out 200 quid
for a set of tyres........
If you base each tyre at approximately 50 quid each, with a new tread
level of 15mm, the cost per mm works out at 3.3 pounds. If we 'lose'
2mm due to new regulations, and the manufactures don't increase the
tread level, then I'll be out of pocket, to the tune of 6.6
pounds/tyre.
As there are four tyres on the car, the potential loss goes up to a
wacking 26.4 pounds!
26.4 pounds is 13.2% of the original 200 pounds outlay, then in
theory, I'll only be getting 86.8% tyre life, based on todays expense.
John.
|
1524.6 | 1mm is not safe | HEAVY::LAW | Mathew Law, SIE (Reading, UK) | Wed Aug 07 1991 12:52 | 8 |
| As .1 says, anyone who lets their tyres get down to the current legal
minimum before replacing them is asking for trouble. The manufacturers
may end up making a little extra money, but I bet that at least 1 life
will be saved by the new tread limit.
Mat.
*:o)
|
1524.7 | What about Hertz & PHH | UBOHUB::KINGSTON_D | Creating the illusion | Wed Aug 07 1991 13:16 | 16 |
| Re: -1
I would agree that to changes tyres before they get down to the legal
limit is a good idea, has anyone told Hertz and PHH?.
In the past I have had real problems in getting tyres changed early,
at ATS in Basingstoke, they told me that it was not unknown for
Hertz to ask them to keep the tyres and they would inspect them
to ensure that the tyres had not been replaced with more than 1mm
of tread.
I bet neither of the above will miss the opportunity to increase
the cost of the lease car.
Dave
|
1524.9 | tread carefully? | TRUCKS::SMART | Taste and try before you buy | Wed Aug 07 1991 14:13 | 17 |
| Where did this figure of 15mm come from? Most new tyres have between 8
- 10 mm of tread when new.
Increasing the tread depth will affect the vehicle stability as JR
rightly says. I wouldn't like to drive my Land Rover (tread depth
12mm) the same way I drive the car!
As to the current legal, I thought it was 1.6mm or is that Europe?
I have the leasemobile tyres changed when the tyre wear indicators are
still about a millimetre below the tread so the total tread depth is
about 2.5mm. This is not as bad as it sounds as my Sierra 4x4 tends to
wear the centres out quicker than the rest even at the correct
pressures. Someone suggested that is was speed related - can't think
what they were inferring ;-)
Alan
|
1524.10 | Price reductions...Yes please | IRNBRU::WILSON | | Wed Aug 07 1991 16:57 | 5 |
| The manufactures could always reduce the prices, to accomodate the
reduced tyre life......what's the chance of that?
There ARE some tyre manufactures who supply 12 and 15mm tread levels on
new tyres.
|
1524.11 | Think positive ? | GVA01::STIFF | Paul Stiff, DSSR, DTN:821-4167 | Wed Aug 07 1991 18:06 | 17 |
| Hummm... generally negative responses.
I can think of 2 clear benefits:
1. Increased road safety, as less cars should slide around the roads.
2. Maybe the standard of driving on British roads will improve a bit so
that you save money - less screaching starts and crazy cornering (so
that people make an effor to make thier tyres last longer.
Possibly another:
British tyre manufacturers will sell more tyres and not have to sell
out to Japannese marques.
Paul
|
1524.12 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Gil, that bed | Wed Aug 07 1991 18:12 | 14 |
| RE: <<< Note 1524.10 by IRNBRU::WILSON >>>
� -< Price reductions...Yes please >-
�
� The manufactures could always reduce the prices, to accomodate the
� reduced tyre life......what's the chance of that?
Why the hell should they? Just because the law changes and you are now
forced to replace your tyres a little closer to the time when they
should be replaced, why should the tyre companies compromise their
profits, and therefore their viability, to make *your* life easier.
Get real.
Laurie.
|
1524.13 | Oh, Dunrop! | NEWOA::SAXBY | | Wed Aug 07 1991 18:16 | 6 |
|
Re .11
What British tyre companies?
Mark
|
1524.16 | | NEWOA::SAXBY | | Wed Aug 07 1991 18:27 | 6 |
|
Re .14
I just KNEW someone would mention the maker of the Marcos' tyres! :^)
Mark
|
1524.18 | | HEAVY::LAW | Mathew Law, SIE (Reading, UK) | Fri Aug 09 1991 18:42 | 7 |
| re: .8
Are you saying that driving with less tread is safer?
Mat.
*:o)
|
1524.20 | ? | NEWOA::SAXBY | | Mon Aug 12 1991 12:20 | 6 |
|
Why does increased depth = harder compound? I'd've thought on road
tyres that the deeper tread would have allowed softer compound to
give a life similar to a shallower, harder compound tyre?
Mark
|
1524.21 | They still cost the same to make ! | CHEST::LEECH | IBOS - Morgue division ! | Mon Aug 12 1991 12:42 | 12 |
| What I think we are missing is how much the tyre costs to produce ?
OK if we all go out and buy tyres more frequently, then the *turnover*
of the tyre companies increase, but then again, so do overheads (to
produce more tyres you have to buy more materials, pay for the extra
man hours to produce them etc...). No matter how many tyres we buy,
the companies only make the same amount of profit per tyre as they do
now. They don't gain by us not using tread (as they don't get it back!)
so why should they charge less ?
Shaun (not sponsored by a tyre company, but open to offers ;^)
|
1524.22 | | SBPUS4::MARK | Stop that fox | Mon Aug 12 1991 13:19 | 10 |
| > man hours to produce them etc...). No matter how many tyres we buy,
> the companies only make the same amount of profit per tyre as they do
> now. They don't gain by us not using tread (as they don't get it back!)
> so why should they charge less ?
The economies of scale ? One tyre costs less to build as a part of a batch of
100 then it does as a one-off. Although diminishing returns will affect the
outcome, there will be a difference.
Also, investment and share incomes may be altered.
|
1524.23 | Yes, but... | CHEST::LEECH | IBOS - Morgue division ! | Mon Aug 12 1991 13:38 | 14 |
| Mark,
�The economies of scale ? One tyre costs less to build as a part of a batch of
�100 then it does as a one-off. Although diminishing returns will affect the
�outcome, there will be a difference.
But how much of a difference in cost will the be to build 1 tyre as a
batch of 100 and 1 tyre built as a batch of around 120 ?
Although I do agree with what you say in principle, when looked at in
context, I think the difference will be very marginal.
Shaun.
|
1524.24 | THE LIMIT | YUPPY::ELLAWAY | Martin Ellaway@hhl | Mon Aug 12 1991 14:15 | 8 |
| In september's CAR it says:
"FROM 1 JANUARY 1992,the minimum tyre tread
depth increases from 1mm to 1.6mm across
75 percent of the tyre's width."
Regards Martin
|
1524.25 | Pick a number, any number ... | BRUMMY::BELL | Martin Bell, TCC, Birmingham UK | Mon Aug 12 1991 14:23 | 4 |
| Re: .24
... anyone know why the limit should be 1.6mm and not 1.5 or 1.7 or
1.666 recurring?
|
1524.26 | Safer going straight, perhaps. | TLE::LEGERLOTZ | When I want your opinion I'll ask for it. | Mon Aug 12 1991 17:41 | 23 |
| RE: Less tread safer in the dry.
As your tires wear, they aren't uniform across the tread. The tires on the
front of the car aren't the same shape anymore and less tread touches the
tarmac. They start to become angled on the side from cornering, ie:
New tire |____| Worn tire \___/
The scale is a bit off, but you should be able to see what I'm getting at.
The difference between 1 and 1.6 mm is so minor that the tires are shot, anyway.
You may say that the bald tires are safer on dry (clean) STRAIGHT tarmac, but
in a curve, you have less grip.
This wearing also lends itself to a shimmy in the front end whilst travelling at
motorway speeds (this is also unsafe).
-Al
|
1524.28 | Maybe on paper. | TLE::LEGERLOTZ | When I want your opinion I'll ask for it. | Mon Aug 12 1991 19:30 | 13 |
| I just got rounded off tires replaced on my car.
Not only does it corner better now (I can go faster before squealing, etc...)
but all shimmy is gone, etc...
These were Uniroyals on BMW 325i - 30,000 miles old. The rear tires where at
or below the limit and the fronts where severely rounded.
In a physics lab, rounded tires may be better, but on my car, the new ones are
a great improvement.
-Al
|
1524.29 | But then he doesn't drive a BMW! | NEWOA::SAXBY | | Tue Aug 13 1991 09:49 | 5 |
|
I think you'll find Derek is talking about race tracks, not physics
labs.
Mark
|
1524.30 | Jargon... | HUGS::AND_KISSES | Scott Marshall | Tue Aug 13 1991 12:17 | 4 |
| A question from Mr Ignorant: what is "shimmying", as mentioned in a couple of
recent notes?
Scott
|
1524.31 | True or Bluff | HAMPS::NISBET_D | Dougie Nisbet | Tue Aug 13 1991 12:49 | 16 |
| Shimmying, (really two words, Shimmy - ying), is what happens when you
finally run out of tread and suffer a blowout. The expression describes
the frantic and desperate manouvering required at 90mph on the motorway
after such an event.
The 'Shimmy' is when you swerve to the left in a desperate attempt to
get to the the hard shoulder, followed immediately by a 'Ying' to the
right as you try and compensate for the turn.
It is thought by some to be a distortion of the older word
'Shittiepong', which describes the reaction of the driver after
suffering a blowout. However, the reference to the worn tread is
tenous, and is generally considered too vague for common use.
Dougie
|
1524.32 | shim? me? | TLE::LEGERLOTZ | When I want your opinion I'll ask for it. | Tue Aug 13 1991 20:46 | 15 |
|
RE: Last 8^PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Perhaps my terms are off, etc... What I'm talking about is a shake or shudder
of the steering wheel.
RE: The race track
I'm sure that he's right in terms of how the car performs there, but then again,
there is no minimum amount of tread required there 8^)
-Al
|
1524.34 | | NEWOA::SAXBY | Trailing Edge Technology | Thu Aug 15 1991 11:41 | 19 |
|
It's not that often that I find myself totally agreeing with Derek, but
this is one of those times.
If tread = grip in the dry then why do racing cars use slicks?
Equally, tread in the wet is not to give grip, it's to get the water
out from under the tyre to allow the rubber to reach the road. In this
case the pattern is equally (if not more) important than the tread
depth.
I would surmise that the 1.6mm is merely to bring the UK into line with
the rest of the EC.
Mark
PS Derek's tyres have to be road legal due to the class of racing he's
in, but he and the other competitors buff the tyres down to the limit
to improve the grip.
|
1524.35 | IMHO balancing | TIMMII::RDAVIES | An amateur expert | Thu Aug 15 1991 14:22 | 12 |
| >><<< Note 1524.32 by TLE::LEGERLOTZ "When I want your opinion I'll ask for it." >>>
>> -< shim? me? >-
>>Perhaps my terms are off, etc... What I'm talking about is a shake or shudder
>>of the steering wheel.
This is called whell vibration caused probably because at 30k miles
your tyres have worn and are out of balance!.
Any new tyre, balanced should have fixed this.
Richard
|
1524.36 | I got them balanced and it didn't make a difference. | TLE::LEGERLOTZ | When I want your opinion I'll ask for it. | Thu Aug 15 1991 18:02 | 17 |
| RE: Tires out of balance.
Actually, I had them balanced about 3000 miles before I had them replaced. I
had noticed the vibration and wanted to get it taken care of before I went on a
trip from New Hampshire to Indiana (2000 miles round trip).
They rebalanced the tires but said that I didn't do much good and that the only
way to eliminated the vibration was to replace them.
He was right. New tires took care of it.
I typically have the tires balanced every 10,000 miles. It doesn't cost much
and makes the ride of the car better.
-Al
|
1524.37 | page 148 in septembers CAR explains all | YUPPY::ELLAWAY | Martin Ellaway@hhl | Fri Aug 16 1991 18:53 | 1 |
|
|
1524.38 | | SHIPS::ALFORD_J | an elephant is a mouse with an oper. sys. | Mon Aug 19 1991 12:29 | 4 |
| > -< page 148 in septembers CAR explains all >-
...not all of us get CAR, or wish to pay out for one page.
|
1524.39 | National Reading Library. | NEWOA::SAXBY | Trailing Edge Technology | Mon Aug 19 1991 12:32 | 4 |
|
Not got a Smiths in Fareham, Jane?
Mark
|
1524.40 | | SHIPS::ALFORD_J | an elephant is a mouse with an oper. sys. | Mon Aug 19 1991 14:09 | 3 |
| > Not got a Smiths in Fareham, Jane?
Yes, but I still don't want to pay approx �2.00 for 1 page of info.
|
1524.41 | Sort of Borrow | VOGON::MORGAN | J.F.D.I. | Mon Aug 19 1991 14:17 | 8 |
| I think what Mark means is why buy it when you can read it for free in
the shop.
I must admit I read all the car mags in Tesco on a Thursday night as
the wife undertakes her weekly foray into the unknown.
R
|
1524.42 | Test drive of CAR, please. | NEWOA::SAXBY | Trailing Edge Technology | Mon Aug 19 1991 14:26 | 6 |
|
Exactly!
After all, you wouldn't buy a car without driving it first, would you?
Mark
|
1524.43 | ..and remoulds? | CRISPY::GERRYT | | Wed Sep 04 1991 14:01 | 5 |
| Now here's the crux....
"Does it mean we'll get better quality remoulds ???!"
Tim
|
1524.44 | some statistics | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Mon Jan 20 1992 12:23 | 16 |
|
The daily mail has average tread mileage for different cars.....
My guess would be if you're getting average tread, you're not abusing
the tyres.
Ford Granada 2.0i 14,700
Ford Sierra 2.0GSI 19,100 this is RWD
Vauhall cavalier 2.0sri 12,300 this is FWD
Ford escort 1.6xri 16,200
Ford sierra 1.6l and gl 19,000
vauxhall cavalier 1.6l and gl 17,200
Heather
|