T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1493.1 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Dave Kerrell @RDL 899-5279 | Mon Jul 08 1991 14:17 | 3 |
| Shouldn't this be in EF91?
/Dave.
|
1493.2 | | WOTVAX::MEAKINS | Clive Meakins | Mon Jul 08 1991 14:33 | 5 |
| Can't say I noticed Nige being called English except when mention was
made of the new English record - this is an English record for number
of GP wins, not British.
Maybe we should be called Europeans? Definately for EF91 now!
|
1493.3 | | CERRIN::PHILPOTT | Col I F 'Tsingtao Dhum' Philpott | Mon Jul 08 1991 14:43 | 7 |
| Mansell broke Moss' English record for number of wins. However a certain well
known Scot has about 10 more wins, so Mansell has a long way to go to get the
British record.
I suspect most Europeans could care less about sub-national records like Moss'
/. Ian .\
|
1493.4 | | KERNEL::WATTERSON | Escape from Basingstoke | Mon Jul 08 1991 14:44 | 7 |
|
re .0
Didn't I hear Mansell himself say he was proud 'as an Englishman' to
overtake Moss' record ?
Paul (from the Isle of Man)
|
1493.5 | Been there, done that... | HUGS::AND_KISSES | Scott Marshall | Mon Jul 08 1991 14:49 | 12 |
| This is a very old debate...
Sports commentators always do this, almost subconsciously:
English person does well -> (English) commentator says "English"
English person does badly -> commentator says "British"
Scottish/Welsh/NI person does well -> commentator says "British"
Scottish/Welsh/NI person does badly -> commentator says "Scottish/Welsh/NI"
Not fair really...
Scott
|
1493.6 | GOOD, BUT NOT GOOD ENOUGH! | IRNBRU::WILSON | | Mon Jul 08 1991 15:28 | 20 |
|
Being a British citizen, of Scottish nationality, I would love to
see Nigel Mansel "or any Brit", break Jackie Stewarts record for grand
prix wins. Somehow though, I don't think think that old Nigel has the
ability to do it, which is another reason for the English commentators
NOT to put him up on a pedestal too quickly...only to be shot down
again!
As far as I am concerned, he is not in the same class as Stewart, Hill,
Clark and the likes, who's driving abilities helped to shape the world of
grand prix driving. To state facts like" the best English driver" only
belittles Nigel Mansels, and the true great Brits, influence on the British
and world grand prix racing arena.
Yes he is good, but there is a long way from being good to great!!
John.
|
1493.7 | Balkanism | DCC::HAGARTY | Essen, Trinken und Shaggen... | Mon Jul 08 1991 15:47 | 3 |
| Ahhh Gi'day...�
Go directly to Yugoslavia.
|
1493.8 | Another tryer | VIVIAN::C_NICHOLS | | Mon Jul 08 1991 16:03 | 3 |
|
Bring back Eddie "the Eagle" Edwards.......
|
1493.9 | Chin Up Edward Old Chap. | IRNBRU::WILSON | | Mon Jul 08 1991 17:03 | 5 |
| Should it not read Eddie "the English eagle" Edwards....
Rather him than me......I hope he does well next season.
|
1493.10 | Eagle rathole continuation | UNTADH::TOWERS | | Tue Jul 09 1991 08:46 | 8 |
| The last time Eddie put himself in hospital for a few weeks (two
seasons ago?) the skiing authorities introduced new rules to
effectively ban amateurs who when they fly off a big hill can't
guarantee which way up they will land.
So, until he learns how to ski jump properly, no more Eddie the Eagle!
Brian
|
1493.11 | Go for it Edward! | IRNBRU::WILSON | | Tue Jul 09 1991 09:36 | 9 |
| What a pity....could his chin (landing gear) not take the strain?
I bet old Nigel-M could do it though. I've no doubt that 'somebody'
would say that because Nigel tried it, he should be eligible for
another Grand Prix Win, therby taking him over the 'driving' record set by
'David Demon Dixon'....the Derbyshire car thief, THE only guy capable
of evading to cops 17 times!!
|
1493.12 | | HAMPS::LINCOLN_J | Where sheep dare | Tue Jul 09 1991 09:51 | 5 |
| In the post race interview Mansell expressed himself as
being "overcome" at "having made history", so there is at
least one person who thinks it matters.
-John
|
1493.13 | Perhaps there is another reason.... | CEEHER::MCCABE | | Tue Jul 09 1991 11:08 | 6 |
|
Wasn't Moss the driver with the most Grand Prix wins, who had not managed to
win a world championship? Perhaps not a mantle that Mansell would be so happy
to wear.
Terry
|
1493.14 | He re-wrote what history book?? | IRNBRU::WILSON | | Tue Jul 09 1991 11:11 | 9 |
|
Of course it matters to him. I too would be "overcome" if I had driven
to my 17th grand prix win. It is a good personal performance.......but, as
for making "history", it all depends on your definition of history, does it
not?
My budgie lived for 17 years, possibly it too made "history".
|
1493.15 | A Great Englishman | VANGA::KERRELL | Dave Kerrell @RDL 899-5279 | Tue Jul 09 1991 13:36 | 7 |
| I don't know for sure but I would be willing to bet that if you checked through
the results of all moderen GPs and compared the driver results, Mansell would
be amongst the best.
How many GPs did The Shunt win?
/Dave.
|
1493.16 | The hall of fame | IRNBRU::WILSON | | Tue Jul 09 1991 14:00 | 13 |
| For the record: GRAND PRIX WINS
Jackie Stewart (27)
Jim Clark (25)
Nigel Mansel (17)
Rod Stewart (0)
Johnathan Palmer (0) << WHO??????
|
1493.17 | Worralorrafuss | DOOZER::JENKINS | seriously 'ken shabby | Tue Jul 09 1991 14:00 | 13 |
|
Re .14 and before
Why make so much fuss about this? Mansell, an Englishman, broke
an English record. He didn't break the Scottish record, nor did
he break the British record.
In other sports, like athletics, there are English, Scottish,
Welsh AND British records so why not in Motor Racing too?
Richard.
|
1493.18 | hee hee hee | LARVAE::HUTCHINGS_P | I don't make misteaks | Tue Jul 09 1991 14:32 | 5 |
| re .16
:-) :-) :-)
brill..!!!
|
1493.19 | He couldnt do it for FERRARI | NIBLIK::THOMSONS | | Tue Jul 09 1991 14:40 | 3 |
| Perhaps old Nigel was so happy at his new ENGLISH record because he
knows himself that he will never be a World Champion far less a British
record holder.
|
1493.20 | Hit it harder the next time! | IRNBRU::WILSON | | Tue Jul 09 1991 14:48 | 9 |
|
I heard that he was so angry, that he could not get the gearbox in the
Williams to break this time. Apparently he was spotted with a 15lb hammer
just before the race started....interesting!!!!!
Anyhow, he has promised all the fans (all 10 of them), that he will retire
with gearbox trouble at next weeks British GP!
Go for it Nigel...
|
1493.21 | | RUTILE::GUEST | Someone | Tue Jul 09 1991 15:10 | 12 |
| re a number i've read over the few weeks.
I presume you would be happier if he was the traditional 'it's not the
winning but the taking part' type of Englishman wouldn't you.
It's that sort of attitude which first of all led to the decline of the
Empire, and a steady deterioration in Britains standing in the world
during the 50's, 60's and 70's. The attitude of 'someone else can do
it', 'Jobsworth' etc.
Nigel
|
1493.22 | | CHEFS::BRIGGSR | Four Soft Tyres on a Muddy Road | Wed Aug 14 1991 10:54 | 26 |
|
I used to share a house with a Scotsman for 2� years (in the early 70s)
and he made this same observation.
So, we conducted a sort of survey when watching the box for the number
of times any individual or event was (to our knowledge) misrepresented
with regard their/its nationality. This would include the
Scots/English/British thing as well as any others we noticed such as
Canadian/American, Indian/Pakistani, US/English etc.
The only conclusion we came to was that Scotsmen are no more
misrepresented than anyone else. A good example was Pop Groups. Most
non-English speakers used to (and probably still do) think that people
like the Hollies, Who, Herman's Hermits etc were American. In fact I
have known such people think that the Beatles were the ONLY pop group
of the 60s to come out of Britain!
Closer to the conference topic. The other point Scotsmen used to make
was concerning the comparison of roads (the fact that the M6 stopped at
Carlisle). True, but in 1972 I could drive from Ayr to Stirling on dual
carriageway for 90% of the way. I could not identify anywhere in
England where (that wasn't served by motorways, and remember there
wasn't many motorways then!) that you drive a similar distance on such
good roads.
Richard
|
1493.23 | | HUGS::AND_KISSES | Scott Marshall | Wed Aug 14 1991 13:07 | 3 |
| re .22 The other advantage of Scottish roads is that the scenery is nicer...
Scott
|
1493.24 | Hey Yeah, that's interesting man | HAMPS::NISBET_D | Dougie Nisbet | Thu Aug 15 1991 09:13 | 20 |
| On an interesting rambling aside - I've noticed a really wierd sort of
inverted snobbery about living and driving in the South-East. I
sometimes find myself boasting about things which we really should be
ashemed off. For example, on returning home to Edinburgh;
"Call that a traffic jam?! Why, if I don't get on the M25 before 7AM I
might as well just give up and go home. It has millions of lanes, you
know ... None of this 4-lane motorway nonsense. What do you mean, you
don't need more?"
So that proggie on telly last night about Jumbo jets and concorde? I
must admit, its pretty impressive sight when driving along the M4 and
Concorde flies over. Perhaps that should be in the Seen in Passing
note?
Which reminds me, I've always wondered. If Concorde is flying away from
you, at Supersonic speed, does that mean you can't hear it ....
Dougie
|
1493.25 | | NEWOA::SAXBY | Trailing Edge Technology | Thu Aug 15 1991 10:11 | 8 |
|
You can't hear where it is, just where it was! :^)
I think!
Mark
|
1493.26 | | NEWOA::MACMILLAN | So many V****s, so little time | Thu Aug 15 1991 10:28 | 4 |
| But you can never hear something where it is if it's moving (unless
you're in/on it)
Rob
|
1493.27 | :^) | NEWOA::SAXBY | Trailing Edge Technology | Thu Aug 15 1991 10:29 | 5 |
|
What about if you're in front of it? Will you hear it where it's going
to be?
Mark
|
1493.28 | | PUGH::FRENCHS | Semper in excernere | Thu Aug 15 1991 11:12 | 6 |
| just to spoil the current thread, Concord doesn't go supersonic whilst over the
mainland. I believe it does its thing at the end of the Bristol chanel. Can
someone confirm this.
Simon
|
1493.29 | | NEWOA::SAXBY | Trailing Edge Technology | Thu Aug 15 1991 11:13 | 8 |
|
Yep, Concorde is not allowed to go supersonic over land.
Or so I've heard... :^)
Mark
|
1493.30 | Mach 1.4 possible | KETJE::SHASTA::RUTTER | I'd Buy Other Software | Thu Aug 15 1991 13:07 | 13 |
| � Yep, Concorde is not allowed to go supersonic over land.
There was a small article in the paper on Monday which described
a 'DIY supersonic plane' for about �150,000.
This basically consisted of a jet engine, with wings and a pair
of seats connected to it. The all-up weight was designed so that
it can be flown on a Private Pilots License.
In the article it did state that it is against flying regulations
to travel overland at supersonic speeds. That will also apply to Concorde.
J.R.
|
1493.31 | Fun! | NEWOA::SAXBY | Trailing Edge Technology | Thu Aug 15 1991 13:16 | 5 |
|
Errr, how are you supposed to breath in/on this thing at supersonic
speeds?
Mark
|
1493.32 | If anyone buys one, I'll go as a passenger | KETJE::SHASTA::RUTTER | I've Been Out Supping ! | Thu Aug 15 1991 17:56 | 19 |
| � -< Fun! >-
I certainly think it would be...
� Errr, how are you supposed to breath in/on this thing at supersonic
� speeds?
Just open your mouth wide !!!
Actually, there is a body and a canopy. The nose is not dissimilar
to a Hawk (ala Red Arrows) and the wings/tailplanes look like the
Eagle, I think (the Top Gun plane ?).
I can't spare 150 grand, but if you get together a dozen people
(who haven't just bought new houses and/or cars) then maybe it
would be reasonable - just as long as your aren't last in line
to fly the thing...
J.R.
|