[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference terri::cars_uk

Title:Cars in the UK
Notice:Please read new conference charter 1.70
Moderator:COMICS::SHELLEYELD
Created:Sun Mar 06 1994
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2584
Total number of notes:63384

1385.0. "New V6 engine from VW" by NCEIS1::CHEVAUX (Patrick Chevaux, Nice, 828-6995) Fri Mar 15 1991 18:26

    After years of development the new VW V6 makes its debut at the Geneva
    Auto Show on the PASSAT. Rather interesting architecture:
    
    V6 open at 15 degrees (yes like on various Lancias)
    Cast iron block, Aluminium head (one combined head for the 6 cyl)
    DOHC, 2 valves per cyl
    Compression ratio  10:1
    Bore : 81mm     Stroke : 91.3mm    Capacity: 2.8 litres
    Peak power:  174bhp @5800 rpm (128kW)
    Peak torque: 24.5mkg@4200 rpm (240Nm)
    
    Very compact engine installed transversely: 500x520x680mm
    
    The CORRADO is likely to receive the VR6 someday.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1385.1Just love looking at engines.RUTILE::SMITH_ANo-one puts baby in the cornerMon Mar 18 1991 08:0714
    Yep, saw it there in a cut-away display.
    
    >>>     Very compact engine installed transversely: 500x520x680mm
    
    We're talking *very* compact here. I thought it was a straight-four at
    first until you looked into it more closely. Compare this to the size
    of the old Kent 3.0 or current Stuttgart (?) 2.8 from Ford and you'd
    never guess they were the same capacity.
    
    The V-angle is extremely acute.
    
    Lovely bit of motor.
    
    T.
1385.2NCEIS1::CHEVAUXPatrick Chevaux, Nice, 828-6995Mon Mar 18 1991 08:325
    Audi have released another V6 some time ago in the 100. Very different
    architecture (longitudinal, 90 degrees) but same capacity and similar 
    performance figures : same peak power as the VW, higher peak torque at 
    lower rpm. The Audi V6 is basically a chopped V8 (as the PRV, the
    Maserati, ...).
1385.3CHEFS::CLEMENTSDPublic Sector and TelecommsMon Mar 18 1991 12:563
    Minor rathole, but we mihgt as well get it straight...... I hope.
    2996cc of Ford V6 is the ESSEX engine. The replacement 28somethingor
    other is the COLOGNE motor. Or hab=ve i been wrong since 1979?
1385.4Spot the dork...RUTILE::SMITH_ANo-one puts baby in the cornerMon Mar 18 1991 13:2111
    Yep, you're right,
    I'm a plonker.
    
    Monday morning brain fade I suppose.
    
    re .2 - they also had the Audi V6 at the motor-show, with an excellent
    display where the voice-over gave the schpiel about the technical
    wonderment, while a robot arm removed various chunks of a
    what-looked-like-complete engine and gearbox, to reveal all components.
    
    T.
1385.5PRV?DOOZER::PENNEYRichard Penney 830 4114 @RKA 1/19Thu Mar 21 1991 17:457
Other minor rathole (re .2):

>    lower rpm. The Audi V6 is basically a chopped V8 (as the PRV, the
>    Maserati, ...).

What's a PRV - not the V6 that's in various Peugeot/Renault/Volvo is it? (I 
can't think of the corresponding V8)
1385.6ANNECY::MATTHEWSM+M Enterprises. Thats the CATCHFri Mar 22 1991 10:318
What are the main advantages of a V6 like this with such a small angle
of V, apart from having a single block and head ??? 

Is it just to make it compact, and if so, why not make a similar 
style V4, V8 etc etc ???

Is this just the start of a whole new range of engines ???

1385.7V8 became V6NCEIS1::CHEVAUXPatrick Chevaux, Nice, 828-6995Fri Mar 22 1991 14:079
    .5�What's a PRV - not the V6 that's in various Peugeot/Renault/Volvo is it? (I 
    .5�can't think of the corresponding V8)
    
    Correct. It's the Peugeot/Renault/Volvo (and Alfa, ...). Originally
    they had planned a V8, hence the "V8 architecture" (90 degrees). One
    oil crisis forced the CFM (Compagnie Fran�aise de M�canique, joint
    venture set up to build the PRV engine) to drop 2 cylinders. Same thing
    happened to Maserati. The Audi story is different : they have the V8
    and they wanted a V6, guess what they did ...
1385.8NCEIS1::CHEVAUXPatrick Chevaux, Nice, 828-6995Fri Mar 22 1991 14:117
    .6�Is it just to make it compact, and if so, why not make a similar 
    .6�style V4, V8 etc etc ???
    
    Well, yes, the goal was to make a COMPACT 6 cylinder engine. Lancia
    made a similar V4 engine for the Fulvia family a number of years ago. 
    
    I think Ford had a very compact V4 some time in the 60s.
1385.9Wasn't it?AYOV27::ISMITHShould I stay or should I go?Fri Mar 22 1991 15:036
    .8�    I think Ford had a very compact V4 some time in the 60s.
    
    Which was used in a Saab?
    
    
    Ian.
1385.10SHIPS::SAXBY_MSmoke me a kipper...Fri Mar 22 1991 15:106
    
    Re .9
    
    And Marcos! :^)
    
    Mark
1385.11MASALA::IJOHNSTONrally drivers do it sidewaysFri Mar 22 1991 15:286
    Re -2 
    
    Is that the one taht was used in the corsair?? 1700cc??
    
    
    Ian.
1385.12NCEIS1::CHEVAUXPatrick Chevaux, Nice, 828-6995Fri Mar 22 1991 15:313
    .9�    Which was used in a Saab?
    
    and in the Matra 530 in midship position
1385.13SUBURB::PARKERLAST DAY!Fri Mar 22 1991 15:385
    The interesting thing about the Ford V4 is that it was 2/3 of the Essex
    V6. Thus (I believe) pistons, conrods, valves, valve springs, piston
    rings etc. were interchangeable.
    
    Steve
1385.14ANNECY::MATTHEWSM+M Enterprises. Thats the CATCHFri Mar 22 1991 16:466
    But is the Ford V4 of a similar small V angle, with a single
    cylinder head ???

    I though the reason for a V engine, apart from reducing overall
    engine length, was to make the engine smoother. Is this still
    the case with such a small angle of V ???
1385.15If it's 2/3rds Kent, is it a Ken engine ?RUTILE::SMITH_ANo-one puts baby in the cornerMon Mar 25 1991 08:3811
    Nope, the Ford V4 was not a small angle, single head, engine it was a
    traditional double-header.
    
    I hadn't heard of a V configured engine being smoother. I thought that
    was to do with the number of cylinders and the more balanced forces on
    the crank they produce ? So a V6 or V8 may be a smoother engine, but
    this was because of the 6 or 8 cylinders, not the V config. FWIW I
    think i've read somewhere that a straight 6 is the smoothest
    configuration.
    
    AmS.
1385.16Oh no! NOT again!!!!!SHIPS::SAXBY_MSmoke me a kipper...Mon Mar 25 1991 08:4510
    
    Re. 15
    
    Arrrrrrrrggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!
    
    The V6 is an ESSEX!!!!
    
    The Kent is a 4 in-line!!!!!
    
    Mark
1385.17Does that make it an ESS type ?RUTILE::SMITH_ANo-one puts baby in the cornerMon Mar 25 1991 08:521
    Sorry Mark, I just can't get the hang of this.   :-)
1385.18NCEIS1::CHEVAUXPatrick Chevaux, Nice, 828-6995Wed Mar 27 1991 10:4613
    .15�    think i've read somewhere that a straight 6 is the smoothest
    .15�    configuration.
    
    Correct.
    
    The good V12s are really 2 straight 6 cylinder banks mounted together
    at the right (60,120,180 degrees) angle.
    
    The V8 can be smooth too, but only in the "american" form, that is with
    a crankshaft allowing con-rods every 90 degrees. The Cosworth V8 is just
    the opposite as is the Ferrari V8 (flat crankshaft). The Lancia Thema
    8.32 is a very modified Ferrari V8 : same block with "american"
    cranskshaft hence the smoothness.