T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1340.1 | Are UK Tax Levels Higher or Average? | WOTVAX::MEAKINS | Clive Meakins | Mon Jan 14 1991 11:28 | 10 |
| > This fits in with what I found out while living in France. When the
> Rover 200/400 was launched in France the 216GSi went on sale at
> 97,000FF (about 10K sterling), the spec is THE SAME as the UK car which
> is about 11.5-12K.
In making the comparison of prices we need to know the tax rate on cars
in France. In the UK we have Car Tax - anyone know the percentage? -
with VAT at 15% on top (ie a tax on a tax).
So, can someone volunteer the figures for the UK and France?
|
1340.2 | | OVAL::ALFORDJ | Ice a speciality | Mon Jan 14 1991 11:31 | 11 |
|
I suspect this is a case of which came first...chicken or the egg...
One of the reasons for the inception and subsequent growth in the company car
market, was and still is, the cost of cars in Britain to the private buyer.
Companies, couldn't afford to have their employees stuck for hours by the
side of the road with a clapped out, broken down banger, which is what most
of us could afford as a private car.
Don't count on the dealers changing their attitudes to the British public...
|
1340.3 | Company cars - Import??? | HOO78C::DUINHOVEN | Weird scenes inside the colemine... | Mon Jan 14 1991 12:08 | 10 |
| I don't see, what import cars have to do with company cars.
Years ago I saw a lot of banners screaming: "Buy British"
If people (and fleet owners) would have done this in the past,
less cars would be an import car now.
There are lots of reasons, why there are import cars in the U.K.
I think company cars is not one of them.
Eventhough, there (almost) is a british car in every class, for those
who want to drive British.
Hans
|
1340.4 | Blame the Government | WOTVAX::MEAKINS | Clive Meakins | Mon Jan 14 1991 12:10 | 7 |
| > One of the reasons for the inception and subsequent growth in the company car
> market, was and still is, the cost of cars in Britain to the private buyer.
I'm sure there are many reasons, but I believe a major contributor was
government incomes policy in the 70's (or 60's?). No pay rises were
got around by giving cars instead.
|
1340.5 | | SIEVAX::CORNE | Sometimes you get the Elevator, sometimes the Shaft | Mon Jan 14 1991 13:24 | 11 |
| > I'm sure there are many reasons, but I believe a major contributor was
> government incomes policy in the 70's (or 60's?). No pay rises were
> got around by giving cars instead.
Well, we could solve this at a stroke. No rules on pay rises these days!
Give all company car drivers a pay rise to cover the cost of DIY, and let
us go and DI..
I think the UK new car sales figures would plummet even further!
Jc ;-)
|
1340.6 | Quotes from the Economist article. | UKCSSE::PARKERD | | Tue Jan 15 1991 10:38 | 31 |
|
Time to quote from the Economist and get some more debate going
Extracts Reproduced without permission
".......Any foreign manager arriving in Britain is amazed to find that
the permutations of Ford Sierra, Vauxhall Cavalier and the like he must
offer his staff now define the pecking order in British society. He
ignores them at his peril.
The epidemic took hold in the 1970's, when high rates of income tax and
an attempt by successive governments to control pay made the company
car a good way of rewarding people surrepititiously.......
This pattern of car ownership is without parallel in the world.....
Like that other British obsession, houses, the disease is sponsored by
the state.....despite a ten fold increase over the past decade the tax
on company cars is still just a fraction of the true value of the perk.
......Millions of British motorists are driving around in cars more
plush than they would ever choose to own were they handed the extra
money and told to spend it themselves...There is mounting suspicion too
that Britian's market in cars, parts and servicing has been poisoned by
this system. Private car buyers have become second class citizens.
......The company car phenomenon is part of the reason why prices in UK
stay stubbornly above those on the continent. The parallel is with
health insurance in the USA, where companies insure their staff-and
medical bills are out of control....."
BTW I was wrong about equipment levels, ours are the highest in Europe
but the Economist says the manufacturers can add the "goddies" for very
little extra cost and even base models pre-tax prices are 30% higher in
Britian than in Belgium.
Dave
|
1340.7 | Dispelling a myth | GRANPA::63654::NAYLOR | Purring again. | Wed Jan 16 1991 19:33 | 28 |
| >> and the US have never heard of them!
Not really true. There a mega-DECwrecks running around over here, as well as
Big Blue Wagons and so on. The main difference between the US and the UK is
that when you get your Taurus or Chevvy, all you get to choose is the colour
(color?) as all the cars are standard models with radio, a/c, power steering,
automatic fitted.
There is one BIG difference - the attitude of the dealers. When you take your
DECwreck into a dealer here, he's not interested in YOU as a customer because
you didn't buy the car from him. So, your service is not as good as the private
buyer.
FYI, there are 2 schemes running - Plan A and, wait for it, Plan B. Plan A
gives you a company car at a cost of $25 per week and you get to choose a
Ford Taurus (monster Granada) or a Chevrolet Celebrity (big Carlton). The
lease company pays for everything except petrol. Plan B pays $200 per month
into your pay packet (taxable) and you get to buy your own car which has to
adhere pretty much to the same guidelines as the old UK scheme (when you could
run your own car). There's another scheme called Plan D which pays you to slap
Digital stickers all over your pride and joy, but it's limited to certain
functions.
Now, as to saving the economy, I'd suggest the topic title should be changed to:
"Ban company cars!..help fix Digital's economy.
Brian
|