T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
219.37 | Why isn't it in the test? | RDGE44::ALEUC8 | | Thu Jun 25 1992 15:42 | 5 |
| I wonder why reverse parking (a fundamental and frequently required
manouevre) isn't part of the driving test? It is in Australia, where
everyone is therefore moderately competent at it. (If you bump the kerb
or either of the two dummy cars, which are set the length of your car +
4 feet apart, then you fail the test.)
|
219.38 | No ? | SBPEXE::PREECE | That's MISTER Megalomaniac to you.... | Thu Jun 25 1992 15:55 | 8 |
| Isn't it ?
I thought the UK test had recently been changed to include
Parallel Parking (which is what I assume you mean) ?
Anybody taken the test recently?
Ian
|
219.39 | Virtual Reality???? | COMICS::MCSKEANE | The Ice Maiden....? She Melted.... | Thu Jun 25 1992 16:07 | 11 |
|
My girlfriend took her test in February. Parallel parking is part of
the test but you are given a gap roughly equal to two car lengths to do
it in!!!!!!!!!
When do you ever see a parling space like that in real life?????
POL.
|
219.40 | Uh !! | UFHIS::GVIPOND | Teenage Mutant Mouton Cadet | Thu Jun 25 1992 16:30 | 4 |
|
I took my test 17 years ago and it was in the test then, or am i
missing something ?
|
219.41 | Not in mine there weren't | DOOZER::JENKINS | Suitably refreshed | Thu Jun 25 1992 16:31 | 5 |
|
Was that a driving test Garry? or some other kind?
|
219.42 | | UFHIS::GVIPOND | Teenage Mutant Mouton Cadet | Thu Jun 25 1992 17:11 | 6 |
|
Well it warrant a spelliong test wor it. Seriously though, I was asked
to reverse twice; First time round a corner with both wheels ending up
parrallel to the curb and secondly when parking at the end outside the
exam center.
|
219.43 | IOM test | RTOVC0::SUPPORT_PJ | Quocunque Jeceris Stabit | Fri Jun 26 1992 10:16 | 4 |
| In the Isle Of Man there has been parallel (reverse) parking as part of the test
for years. You have to reverse into a space between two hurdles, the distance of
which is x% longer than the length of the test vehicle. I don't remember what
value x% is, but I'm sure its < 100%
|
219.44 | round the bend | WOTVAX::MACDONALDI | Stalybridge Celtic | Fri Jun 26 1992 12:31 | 6 |
|
I remember having to reverse round a corner as part of my driving test.
Reversing into a parking space is a little easier, if not more
advantageous.
mac
|
219.45 | safety issue over here | ULYSSE::CHEVAUX | Patrick Chevaux @VBE, DTN 828-5584 | Fri Jun 26 1992 12:37 | 5 |
| It is mandatory to reverse park in the Valbonne site car parks
(although not everybody does it) for safety reasons. If evacuation of
the site was needed (because of fire or flood) it would take ages to
get everyone out of the danger area. With reverse parking a couple of
traffic cops could empty the site in 10 minutes.
|
219.46 | Don't back in? | WOTVAX::MEAKINS | Clive Meakins | Fri Jun 26 1992 14:09 | 4 |
| It is sometimes advised NOT to reverse into parking spaces as this
renders your car slightly more liable to theft as it takes just a small
amount of time longer to back a car out. I guess this will only apply
if the thief has a good choice to choose from.
|
219.47 | | UPROAR::EVANSG | Gwyn Evans @ IME - Open DECtrade | Fri Jun 26 1992 15:20 | 4 |
| I seem to recall from a holiday in Florida that it's illegal to park
your car reversed in there. As the cars only have numberplates on the
rear and you reverse in, the police can't then check your number plates
as they cruise by!
|
219.48 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Dave Kerrell @REO 830-2279 | Fri Jun 26 1992 16:12 | 3 |
| Surely safety is paramount?
/Dave.
|
219.49 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Mon Jun 29 1992 14:24 | 10 |
|
>Surely safety is paramount?
On the drive and survive course, they recommend that you reverse in -
most of accidents in car-parks occur when people reverse out.
However, if you do this, it's #$@%$^&%&* awkward to load the shopping
in the boot!
Heather
|
219.50 | More secure to drive in ? | LARVAE::DRSD21::PATTISON_M | I will tell you this boy... | Tue Jun 30 1992 13:12 | 8 |
| My dad saw an article last year that said most of the cars stolen from
car parks had been reversed in, so it was easy to make a quick getaway
by driving straight out, rather than having to ponce about reversing
the car out. I don't know if the way the car is parked has any bearing
on it's theiveability, but I have stopped reversing into parking spaces
now.
M:
|
219.51 | :^) | NEWOA::SAXBY | Vote for Perot : He's got $3B! | Tue Jun 30 1992 13:14 | 4 |
|
Presumably Hyenas have trouble reversing?
Mark
|
219.52 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Dave Kerrell @REO 830-2279 | Tue Jun 30 1992 14:47 | 4 |
| How do they know that? I've had three vehicles stolen and the police ask where
it was parked , not how.
/Dave.
|
219.53 | Sequential and Random Access | OPG::CMITCHELL | | Tue Jun 30 1992 18:51 | 18 |
| I find that car parks tend to fill sequentially and empty at
random. A stream of cars entering Decpark car park in the morning will be
able to park very quickly if each driver swings into the next available bay.
But if one joker decides to reverse then the whole queue has to wait whilst
he makes two or three attempts at parking straight. Very few drivers can
make a good job of reversing, especially if there are impatient drivers
waiting for them to finish.
When drivers leave in the evening they arrive at their cars in a random
order and there is plenty of time and space for them to reverse out. On a
similar subject, when I have the choice between swinging into a bay on the
right or the left I always choose the right to avoid colliding with, or delaying
the opening of the driver's door of the car which has parked just before me.
But if that car also has a passenger, I will leave a bay free and park in the
next so that we can all get out of the cars without bumping doors. But there
is always somebody who will immediately try to park in the spare gap...so I
take my time and let them wait.
|
219.54 | WHERE DID HYENA'S COME INTO IT??? | WELCLU::YOUNG | | Wed Jul 01 1992 10:24 | 4 |
|
re:.51
I've not seen too many hyena parks about?
|
219.55 | | LEECHS::hilton | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Wed Jul 01 1992 10:33 | 4 |
| Mark is talking about all the hyenas used in the stop people nicking
your car ads on the TV
Greg
|
219.56 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Dave Kerrell @REO 830-2279 | Wed Jul 01 1992 10:37 | 7 |
| The fact that there are drivers who can not reverse into a parking space is the
strongest argument I can think of for making it compulsary! If they can't
reverse in, how the hell are the supposed to reverse out safely? I think the
scrape and dent in my lease car (curtesy of a fellow DEC Park resident) is
evidence of that!
/Dave.
|
219.57 | moving forwards is inherently more precise. | BIS1::BHD161::HARRISON | International Band Of Smugglers | Wed Jul 01 1992 11:53 | 22 |
|
re: .56
> The fact that there are drivers who can not reverse into a parking space is the
> strongest argument I can think of for making it compulsary! If they can't
> reverse in, how the hell are the supposed to reverse out safely?
The two cases are not the same - reversing IN requires the driver to
line his car up and get correct spacing and position in the parking
bay; reversing out is performed soley as an intermediate operation
prior to driving away (forwards).
Steering a car in a forward direction is much easier to do with
precision than in reverse because in the former case the rear wheels
'follow' the front wheels while in the later case any slight
mis-alignment of the wheels is exagerated as the car moves.
I also agree with a previous 'speaker' that reversing in, just slows
the whole thing down for people waiting.
Mike H.
|
219.58 | they shouldn't be allowed licences...get em off the roads! | MAJORS::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Wed Jul 01 1992 14:06 | 7 |
| > The two cases are not the same - reversing IN requires the driver to
> line his car up and get correct spacing and position in the parking
> bay;
and is this not a very basic skill required by every driver ??????????
sheesh...
|
219.59 | Fermi -dirac statistics | VANTEN::ORTO | | Wed Jul 01 1992 15:16 | 4 |
| Car parks do not fill up perfectly sequentially. They obey a variant of Fermi-
dirac statistics. You can still get someone who parks on the roof. But they are
only hotheads.
|
219.60 | | BELFST::FLANAGAN | Sir your shrubbery attacked me | Wed Jul 01 1992 15:39 | 4 |
| That's another way of getting your car to spontaneously combust I
expect :^)
Gary.
|
219.61 | Assume they're all blind.......... | VOGON::KAPPLER | Spontaneity is fine in it's place.... | Thu Jul 02 1992 09:52 | 7 |
| I thought the ones who parked on the roof (of the car park, not the
car) were the ones with blinds in their windows.......
JK
p.s. Did you see the picture of the car thief who left the second floor
of the multi-store without using the ramp!
|
219.62 | Don't you just hate them?!? | SUBURB::POWELLM | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be! | Tue Aug 25 1992 13:57 | 15 |
| <<< Note 219.61 by VOGON::KAPPLER "Spontaneity is fine in it's
place...." >>>
-< Assume they're all blind.......... >-
>>> p.s. Did you see the picture of the car thief who left the second
>>> floor of the multi-store without using the ramp!
Was he in the car at the time though John? 8^)
The ones I hate are those (many!) who drive into a car park and
just abandon their car someplace!
Malcolm.
|