T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
294.1 | suggest adding 12V detector | BRMUDA::LUNGER | Dave Lunger, 291-7797, MET-1/K2 | Tue Jul 19 1988 16:40 | 10 |
| Your existing smoke detectors are most likely incompatible with your
security system. The hard wired type of smoke detectors runs on 110v AC,
and I would imagine that third (red) wire is either neutral or 110v.
Typical security systems run off 12V DC, generally with a permanent
charger on a 12v battery so that if you lose power, you still have
security. You may want to wire up an additional 12V smoke/fire/etc
detector to your security system that will work even when the power
is out.
|
294.2 | just need a switchable contact | NSSG::FEINSMITH | | Tue Jul 19 1988 16:51 | 9 |
| I've got a wireless system with remote transmitters. As long as
I can build a switching interface of some sort that will give me
a nc/no set of contacts, I'll be able to intergrate the systems.
The alarm has 3 different "channels" for different type of alerts
which can be interrogated by a central station, so that the proper
agency can be notified. As soon as I can get some time, perhaps
a little metering is what's required.
Eric
|
294.3 | Go for a redundant system. | CLOSUS::HOE | Sammy's daddy | Wed Jul 20 1988 14:16 | 16 |
| Eric
Use the test button and a voltmeter connected to the white and
red wires. See what the output voltage is on the smoke detector
closest to your security system. If the on signal is 115VAC
between the red and the white wires, just add a 115VAC relay and
hook the relay's output to a wireless transmitter.
If the red wire carrys a lower voltage, use a relay of that
voltage rating. Also, it might be cheaper (and more reliable to
get a direct connect detector to your alarm system since it's
battery backed. If you have a electrical system failure, the
battery will still protect you.
cal hoe
|
294.4 | the saga goes on | NSSG::FEINSMITH | | Wed Jul 20 1988 14:30 | 9 |
| Thanks Cal Hoe, but a smoke detector that is compatable with my
system are $56 each (they contain a transmitter plus the detector.)and
I currently have detectors on all levels of my house that are tied
together (currently 3, will probably be 4 in the future). I guess
it will be metering this weekend. I had wanted to delete the ones
that came with house and use compatable ones with my system, but
building code required hard wired units!
Eric
|
294.5 | | CLOSUS::HOE | Sammy's daddy | Thu Jul 21 1988 12:34 | 17 |
| < Note 2470.4 by NSSG::FEINSMITH >
-< the saga goes on >-
I currently have detectors on all levels of my house that are tied
together (currently 3, will probably be 4 in the future). I guess
it will be metering this weekend. I had wanted to delete the ones
that came with house and use compatable ones with my system, but
building code required hard wired units!
Eric
What about the suggestion that a simple relay and a remote
transmitter be used with your wireless system. Since the hard
wired system is there and wired to work together, ONE relay and
ONE remote transmitter is all that you need. Si?
cal
|
294.6 | looking for a fire alarm unit | AKOV11::KALINOWSKI | | Thu Jul 21 1988 18:53 | 22 |
| I am in the process of completing an addition to my house. I
have a new room and an attached garage. One of the things I need
to do before my electrical inspection is put in some remote fire
alarms. I have a 110 system that consists of heat sensors in each
room and a smoke detector above the unit with a battery and 110
looking wiring.
I don't trust the original system (appx 15 years old).
Every so often it goes beeping
, usally about 3 in the morning. When I took it out of the wall
the other day, most of the wires had been disconnected.
What I would like to do is install a new unit that can make use
of the heat detectors and two additional smoke detectors. I
went to Somerville lumber, but they do not carry these units.
Can any tell me where I can pick up schematic or other information
on how these things work? I am also looking for a place that sells
these things so I can buy one.
thanks
john
|
294.7 | Why smoke detectors go off for no reason? | TLE::MEIER | Bill Meier - VAX Ada | Wed Jul 27 1988 11:18 | 19 |
| I don't know if this is the right place to ask, but it seemed the
closest notesfile. Anyway ...
Last night my smoke dectector emitted several 1-5 second bursts
for about 30 seconds. Then, silence for the rest of the night. Of
course, I got out of bed, and checked, and nothing out of the ordinary.
I couldn't smell a thing.
Background: House was built 5 years ago, and I have a pair of smoke
detectors wired together (so when one goes off, they both do), and
they run on 120 VAC. Installed by an electrian. Pretty standard
for new construction.
The only other time they went off was when the house did fill with
smoke from the fireplace.
So, any ideas why, seemingly at random, they would go off? If it
matters, the temperatur in the house was about 79�F, and humid,
although it has been hotter and more humid in the past.
|
294.8 | decectors are sensitive to dust, etc. | NSSG::FEINSMITH | | Wed Jul 27 1988 11:21 | 8 |
| Many plug in smoke detectors are photoelectric rather than ionization
type, although either type could be effected by dirt and dust. The
photoelectric ones can also be set off by insects taking a walk
through (don't laugh, I had one that was doing the same thing. When
I took it apart, I found a spider web inside!). Give the vents around
the detector a good vacuuming to clean out any accumulated dust.
Eric
|
294.9 | Deffective unit | TOLKIN::GUERRA | | Wed Jul 27 1988 12:21 | 14 |
| A defective detector can also be the problem. We had three hardwired
detectors and they kept going off all the time. After swearing and
smashing the one in the cellar with a shovel I figured one of them
was not working right. This happened by coincidence when I re-installed
one of them as the only hardwired detector in the house (the other
two replaced by battery operated ones).
If cleaning them doesn't work, disconnect them one at a time and
wait a few days to see if they still go off. When they stop going
off, the one that is disconnected is the culprit. Replacing it with
the same brand should be a matter of calling the manufacturer to
find a source in your area. I don't know if some other brand would
fit the installation. Does anyone know if the wiring is standard
on all of them regardless of manufacturer?
|
294.10 | | CURIE::BBARRY | | Wed Jul 27 1988 13:11 | 7 |
| < was not working right. This happened by coincidence when I re-installed
< one of them as the only hardwired detector in the house (the other
< two replaced by battery operated ones).
You have just commited a NO NO in Massachusetts which will have to
be corrected when you sell your house. I had the same problem as
.1. The spiders love to make nests in the detector in the basement.
|
294.11 | I've got ssssssss steam heat! | HPSTEK::EKOKERNAK | | Wed Jul 27 1988 13:17 | 6 |
| What a coincidence! My system is just like .0 described, except
it goes off if you open up the bathroom door within 10 minutes of
taking a shower! Makes for a great pick-me-up first thing in the
morning!
Elaine
|
294.12 | | MYVAX::DIAMOND | Not one of the Beasty Boys | Wed Jul 27 1988 13:57 | 8 |
|
re .4
Same with mine untill I installed a exhaust fan for the bathroom.
What a difference.
Mike
|
294.13 | Why *steam* ? | BPOV02::MICHAUD | Think about software that thinks! | Wed Jul 27 1988 14:11 | 6 |
|
Boy I'm glad someone else's detector goes off with steam from
the bathroom. I couldn't figure out why a *smoke* detector goes
off with *steam*. Must be some sort of a heat detector also.
John//
|
294.14 | cleaning doesn't help this one... | NSSG::ALFORD | another fine mess.... | Wed Jul 27 1988 14:28 | 0 |
294.15 | Beeeeeeeeep - Your dinner is ready! | CHART::CBUSKY | | Wed Jul 27 1988 14:29 | 0 |
294.16 | | POOL::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Wed Jul 27 1988 14:43 | 17 |
| >< Note 2497.7 by NSSG::ALFORD "another fine mess...." >
> -< cleaning doesn't help this one... >-
> .... can I just snip the wires, and put up
> some other brand?
My understanding of NH law is that new construction must have
hardwired smoke detectors; batery operated ones are no-nos. This
may apply to significan remodeling too. Based on an earlier reply
I suspect the same holds for MA; and I'd bet that most states
requre this. Reason being that many battery operated models have
batteries removed and never replaced, making them useless.
However, I see no reason to prevent you changing brands. If the
one you replace is connected to [an] other[s] so that they all go
off together (as NH now requires!) then you will have to replace
them all, or at least ensure that the replacement is compatable.
|
294.17 | Another thing it could be | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Wed Jul 27 1988 14:47 | 33 |
| The battery-powered smoke detector I have goes off when the battery
is weak or when the dried hot peppers hit the hot oil in the wok
when we have kung pao chicken (of course, most people run out of
the house when I make that anyhow - some day I will install a chemical
vent hood that vents to the outdoors over the wok's burner!). I
don't have a smoke detector downstairs, although I ought to have
one there since that is where the woodstove (which we don't use
since my husband is allergic to smoke) is, as well as other good
things like the gas furnace, the gas water heater, the solar water
panels' control and heat-exchanger, and the workshop.
One possible thing that can set off the kind of wired-in smoke
detectors is anything that causes a burst of current down the line
that connects them. The detectors are not usually designed to be
oblivious to this (although they *should* be! - I get sick of fixing
up problems like this for my neighbors! We are ham radio operators.).
So, the detector might go off if your ham neighbor transmits on
his radio, or if someone drives by while using a CB radio in their
car, or if you have a cordless or mobile telephone. A friend of
ours spent lots of unpleasant hours getting a neighbor's smoke
detectors to not sound off in Morse code whenever he used his radio
equipment. The design of the detectors wasn't his fault, the
manufacturer was less than helpful, and the owner of the noisy
detectors blamed it all on poor Doug (whose own smoke detectors
didn't have this problem). The problem was eventually solved by
installing capacitors across the wiring connecting the detectors,
and I think the manufacturer ended up doing it. (Doug ended up moving;
the neighbor had given him too much grief by this time.) These
were brandnew houses, so the smoke detectors were under warranty.
If the detectors do not given false alarms when the wiring is
disconnected from them, this could be what is happening. Get the
manufacturer to solve it so you don't void the warranty.
|
294.18 | Have some ideas; thanks | TLE::MEIER | Bill Meier - VAX Ada | Wed Jul 27 1988 15:19 | 16 |
| Thanks for the replies so far. Neither of them are in an area near
a bathroom with a shower, so I don't think its steam. Radios? Well,
this is the first time its happened in 5 years, and I don't think
my neighbor is up at 2:30 am playing with his CB!
One of them is near the AC blower outlet, so it gets a lot of air.
That either blows dust into it, or helps blow dust out of it!
Also, I don't know if this is standard or not, but they are wired
to there own separate circuit breaker. This was _very_ handy once
when I had to turn them off (house was full of smoke from the
fireplace), without zapping other random electrical circuits in
the house.
Maybe I'll at least take off the covers, and clean/dust/remove spider
webs!
|
294.19 | I don't have a down payment on it yet. | TOLKIN::GUERRA | | Wed Jul 27 1988 15:43 | 8 |
| re .3
What kind of smoke detectors I use in my house is none of the state's
business for all I care. I use them and keep them operational for
my own and my family's peace of mind. The day I get a down payment
on that house (not anytime in the near future) I will replace all
of them with something else. Right now it is not done since the
manufacturer went out of business. Hence the question, can they
be replaced by another brand without having to rewire?
|
294.20 | | MYVAX::DIAMOND | Not one of the Beasty Boys | Wed Jul 27 1988 16:11 | 13 |
|
re .9
Most states that I know of say the battery operated ones are no-nos.
My consern with this is that if you have an electrical fire and
shorts everything out, your smoke detector won't work. Personally
I'd rather have a battery operated one, or at least one with a battery
backup system
my $.02
Mike
|
294.21 | | NOELLA::NOELLA | Noella_Doiron, 223-8068, PKO1/C2 | Wed Jul 27 1988 16:46 | 5 |
| My detector also goes off after a shower as noted in .4
and will go off if I use my toaster two times in a row (even
though no smoke can be seen by the human eye)
|
294.22 | What's the law in MA? | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Jul 27 1988 16:51 | 5 |
| RE battery-operated detectors:
I just bought a house in Massachusetts. A smoke-detector certificate
was required (and presented by the seller) at the closing. All the
detectors in the house are battery-operated. So what gives?
|
294.23 | Basically... | LITLTN::CAHILL | Jim Cahill | Wed Jul 27 1988 18:37 | 12 |
| The law in MA says if you sell a house, you must get it inspected
by the local fire department, who will issue you a smoke detector
certificate. What's typically required for existing homes is a
smoke detector on each floor. The rules do not require a hard-
wired model, only that there be at least one on each floor.
Rooming houses, apartment houses, nursing homes, public buildings,
new construction, significant alterations to existing structures,
etc., fall under different rules. Contact your local fire department,
which is the final authority as to what is required.
Jim
|
294.24 | streaking | FDCV14::DUNN | Karen Dunn 223-2651 | Thu Jul 28 1988 09:59 | 29 |
|
We used to live in townhouse condos. We abutted interior stairs and
bathroom with The neighbor on one side. There were smoke detectors on
all three floors, one right outside the bathroom.
One day, they're upstairs detector started going off when they would
come out of the shower and open the bathroom door. Of course, this
meant all three would go off. They would have to run downstairs
two floors to the basement and throw the breaker.
So every morning we would hear the detectors go off, and then the wild
running down the stairs. They kept saying they wanted to return it,
but never got around to it.
One morning, he was taking a shower and the phone rang. He hopped out
of the shower and answered it in the bedroom. So he's stark naked,
dripping wet, talking on the phone. He looks up and sees a cloud of
steam heading from the bathroom. Sure enough, it goes off. He drops
the phone, and starts streaking towards the basement. Next thing we
hear is crash in the livingroom as he falls over a chair and then a
string of loud explictives. He continued hobbling down the stairs,
favoring the toe and knee he had just smashed, and threw the breaker.
We had a pretty good idea he had fallen over something, but didn't
know the whole story until he told us later. I still laugh picturing
that.
Anyway, that night they replaced the detector and it has never
happened again.
|
294.25 | Hardwired is better than battery | POOL::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Thu Jul 28 1988 12:01 | 49 |
| RE: vaious
The more-or-less universal code provides that ALL new construction
must have hardwired smoke detectors, and that they must be on a
seperate circuit with nothing else and now switch except the
circuit breaker. Battery operated units are acceptable as
retro-fits in some cases (single family homes,etc.) but in other
cases, particularly commercial construction in some areas, owners
are required to retro-fit hard wired units. But I'm NOT the
authority here; check with your local building inspector and/or
fire department.
So far as this not being the state's business, well, it is.
Building codes are designed to asure that buildings are safe and
don't present a danger to the community. A fire in your home
endangers your neighbors as well as yourself. Knowing failure to
comply with building codes might also invalidate your insurance.
An aside..
In the USA people who are burned out of their home tend to
receive a great deal of sympathy and support from their family
and comunity. I understand that in JAPAN such people receive
little or no sympathy but may be totaly ostracized for
permitting such a danger to occur!
The reason for not allowing battery operated units is primarily
that people remove and don't replace the batteries. Secondarily,
batery units tyically don't provide a method for setting off ALL
units if any ONE unit detects smoke. (Obviously this would require
wiring and if your running wire you might as well run power at the
same time.)
So far as the imagined danger of having the wiring burn out before
the detectors go off -- well, this is possible, but if the
detectors are located according to code it is EXTREMELY unlikely
that you could have enough fire to kill the power before you had
enough smoke to trigger the detectors.
Of course this still leaves the danger of a fire starting when the
power is off -- like from a lightening strike. That is much more
likely, but its also likely that the acompanying thunder will
waken you anyway.
In the final analysis the dangers of a missing battery are greater
than those of an interrupted electric supply. This fact not
withstanding, I would think that detectors should be REQUIRED to
have built-in, automatically recharged battery backup.
Unfortunately it seems that few if any have this.
|
294.26 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Thu Jul 28 1988 12:09 | 13 |
| > The more-or-less universal code provides that ALL new construction
> must have hardwired smoke detectors, and that they must be on a
> seperate circuit with nothing else and now switch except the
> circuit breaker.
What? Everything I've ever heard suggests that smoke detectors should NEVER
be on a separate circuit. They should be on a lighting circuit, preferably one
that is used often. Reason being that if for any reason the circuit breaker on
your smoke detector circuit went off, you'd never ever know about it unless
something that you use every day - like a hallway light - went out at the same
time.
Paul
|
294.27 | | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Thu Jul 28 1988 12:52 | 15 |
|
RE: .19
Your explanation sounds reasonable, but I believe NH *does*
require a separate circuit for the smoke alarms as .18
suggests. I built my house about a year ago and the smoke
detectors *had* to be on a separate circuit, and the elec-
trical panel had to have in writing next to the breaker:
SMOKE DETECTOR - LEAVE ON
This is in Weare, NH. The building inspector is a member of
the fire dept also, so you can imagine the emphasis he put
on fire safety. (didn't look at my plumbing though, hahahaha)
|
294.28 | | ROXIE::DCL | David Larrick | Thu Jul 28 1988 13:33 | 4 |
| .19> ...smoke detectors should ... be on a lighting circuit, preferably one
.19> that is used often.
My understanding is that this is now required for new construction in Mass.
|
294.29 | | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Thu Jul 28 1988 15:26 | 8 |
| The smoke detectors in my last house would turn on and stay on about
once every 3 years. Vacuuming them didn't help - I had to disassemble
them and wipe the plate inside that reflects the light. The things
were thick with dust. From the angles involved it looked more like
the plate reflected light *away* from the detector, which only would
get light if there was dust or smoke to scatter light.
Larry
|
294.30 | thats the way it works | NSSG::FEINSMITH | | Thu Jul 28 1988 15:40 | 5 |
| RE: .22, thats exactly the way the photoelectric smoke detectors
work, by having smoke particles deflect the light toward the detector.
Normally, the light is aimed away from the detector, as you observed.
Eric
|
294.31 | Well, not 5 years ago in MA ... | TLE::MEIER | Bill Meier - VAX Ada | Thu Jul 28 1988 15:43 | 12 |
| I don't know what time-frame "new" refers to, but my house was built
new 5 years ago in MA, and the smoke detectors are on a circuit by
themselves. The electrican was very good, and one who did a lot of
work for the builders of Deck Houses, so I'm say he knew what to
do. But, I haven't seen, nor can quote the "code".
As to labelling of the circuit breaker with the smoke detectors
on it ... I mapped out my whole house's wiring diagram with the
standard trial and error method, and I had this one "unused" breaker.
I never found out what it went to, until the night when the thing
went off, and I just started at the top of the breaker box flipping
breakers until it stopped!
|
294.32 | | WILKIE::DDODA | Hey man, is that Freedom Rock? | Thu Jul 28 1988 17:20 | 5 |
| My 9 year old house in Londonderry NH has the smoke detector on
the same circuit as the hall lights. I asked my friend who is an
about it and he said that's the way they should be wired in NH.
daryll
|
294.33 | A Couple Of Questions Answered | ELWOOD::DUFORT | | Fri Jul 29 1988 08:34 | 21 |
| I asked two of the questions that were mentioned in previous replies
to a licensed electrician in Mass. Question #1, Can smoke detectors
be on a circuit by themselves? The answer is NO. The reason is that
You may have a tendency to turn them off when doing some work that
will trigger them off and forget to turn them back on. If put on
with another circuit,(such as the basement light, like mine is,)
you will eventually remember to turn it back on.
Question #2, Can smoke detector brands be wired together? The answer
to that one is NO also. There is no guarranty that different
manufacturers will work when wired together. I got the same answer
from the electrical supply house I went to to get 4 new ones because
I wanted to add one in my new addition and could not find one to
match my existing ones.
The botom line is this; Would you want to take the chance that they
will go off if a fire occurred while you were sleeping?
Dave Dufort (who's mind is at rest because he changed his smoke
detectors to all the same brand.)
|
294.34 | | POOL::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Fri Jul 29 1988 12:15 | 19 |
| My home in NH has the smoke detectors on a seperate circuit
because the building inspector required me to do it that way. This
home was new construction approximatley 3 years ago. The reason
given was to prevent them from being turned of if you had to turn
off anything else for some reason, including an overloaded
circuit. As I stated earlier this circuit may not be switched
anywhere except at the circuit breaker.
The above sounded reasonable at the time, and still does, but I
must admit that the argument for having them on the same circuit
as some frequently used lights is also a good one. In fact some of
the same arguments as used against battery operated units apply.
If its a seperate circuit and gives trouble, you can turn it of
and forget it. Likewise if the dectors go off because of kitchen
or fireplace smoke.
...then on the other hand with a shared circuit what do you do if
the detectors go off because of kitchen or fireplace smoke?
(Assuming its night and you NEED those lights?)
|
294.35 | More .. | OCTAVE::VIGNEAULT | The Central Scrutinizer | Mon Aug 01 1988 09:43 | 23 |
|
My smoke detectors are wired into the house circuitry. About 1
and 1/2 years ago, the fuse panel in the basement decided to short
out. This caused an immediate power failure in the house, and the
smoke detectors never made a chirp due to the failure. Had we not
been home, or had it occurred during the night, the consequences
would've been tragic. I had a fire extinguisher handy which I had
never used for 3 years, and was able to put out the fire which
had already started burning the floor joist, and part of the wall.
More recently ..
Last night I had the alarms go off three times in approx 15 mins.
Once was just a brief burst, then two more were approx 30-40 seconds.
This happened at 4:00 Am and was quite unnerving to say the least.
We searched the entire house for any sign of smoke, and couldn't
figure out why the alarm went off. It was an extremely humid and
foggy morning, and we had a fan in our window sucking in air from
outside. Is it possible that the fog and humidity could have caused
the alarm to trigger if it's photoelectric ? How can you tell what
type of smoke detector it is - ionization or photoelectric ?
Larry
|
294.36 | Me, too | STAR::KMCDONOUGH | | Mon Aug 01 1988 11:07 | 12 |
| Hi, Larry.
My smoke detectors also went off last night in a big way. In my
case, I had the whole house fan pulling in the cooler outside air.
I found no trace of smoke or heat anywhere in the house and I finally
threw the breaker to shut the alarm off.
There was some fog in the air. Would that be enough to set off
the alarm? Why?
Kevin
|
294.37 | | PSTJTT::TABER | The project killer | Mon Aug 01 1988 11:29 | 16 |
| The ionization detectors that I have seen have a disposal warning on
them. If you remove the cover and look either in the cover or on the
bare material of the detector, you should see numerous cautions,
instructions for use, certifications etc printed. If somewhere in there
it tells you that you must return the unit to the manufacturer for
disposal, it's probably an ionization detector. (They have a small
amount of radioactive substance in them, and so the manufacturer can't
tell you to just toss it in a dumpster, which is undoubtedly what you'll
do.)
re: .-2
Again, I can only speak for the detectors I've seen, but the new
hardwired ones seem to all have some sort of battery backup in them to
protect you when the power goes out.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
294.38 | Beep!, BEEEEEEP! | TRACTR::DOWNS | | Mon Aug 01 1988 13:12 | 6 |
| My have been blowing off also. As noted in an earlier reply, I removed
all three and blew them out with a small compressor. I put them
back together and all was fine for the next two days. Then this
morning (humid, foggy) they started up again. I have the ionization
type and I'm ready to ionize them! The breaker is off and so are
the smoke detectors or should we call them fog/humidity alarms?
|
294.39 | Call the manufacturer! | CIMNET::TOMPKINS | | Mon Aug 15 1988 13:46 | 9 |
| I sympathize with all you folks having smoke detector "false alarms".
My house is now about 5 yrs. old, and I had trouble with false alarms
from the first, especially in hot, humid weather. I tried the
vacuuming routine with little improvement. Finally got fed up and
used a false alarm to isolate the guilty detector. Pulled it down,
called the manufacturer to complain. He muttered something about
"overly sensitive" units, and sent me a new one free of charge.
I installed it, and the problem went away FOR GOOD! No false alarms
in 3 years!
|
294.40 | need brand name and model # | NSSG::FEINSMITH | | Mon Oct 17 1988 16:42 | 11 |
| Hard wired smoke detectors use three wires, two for 110 v power
and one for signaling. The signaling wire is the one which
interconnects them together so if one goes off, all will go off.
What is the brand detector you have installed? The ones I've seen
have a connector which plugs in, but some may be spliced with a
wire nut. As a guess (since I don't know all the color codes), the
black and white wires are generally for power, while the remaining
one is the signal. Since they may differ brand to brand, we'd need
to know what brand yours are to identify the wiring code.
Eric
|
294.41 | HELP!!!! They Still Go Off | CIVIC::WEBER | | Wed Oct 19 1988 10:10 | 31 |
| HI,
On Monday 10-17-88 I entered another note asking for help, but when
I got home Monday night and tested the smoke alarm it worked ok.
Then last night at 12AM and 1AM they went off again. They still
go off this morning. Can anyone help!
Here is what I know. The unit it totally self contained, I can't
figure out how to get inside. It mounts to the ceiling on a bracket.
The base of the unit has 3 holes into which are 3 wires. The wires
are black, white and red. The red wire is inserted into a hole marked
"interconnect". On one of the units I was able to pull out, and
reinsert, the red wire. However, on the other 2 I have been unable
to pull the wire. The units are installed in my basement, 1 & 2
floor hallways, and on the roof in the attic. The attic does have
direct exposure to the outside.
So far I have tried wiping off the base of the units, to remove
dust (on all but the attic--I can't get to that one) and blowing
the hair dryer on it.
One specific question I have is whether there is a way to test,
assuming I can figure out how to test them, the attic one to see
if it's the problem one, without having to get up there. You see
I am afraid of ladders.
Any advice or help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
nancy
|
294.42 | I hate ladders too! 8^) | MISFIT::DEEP | This NOTE's for you! | Wed Oct 19 1988 12:39 | 18 |
|
I would assume that the attic one is connected via the "interconnect wire"
to the one on the 2nd floor. Therefore, if you disconnect that wire,
it should isolate the attic alarm from the rest of the system. If the
other alarms still go off, then I would say the attic one is not the
culprit, and vice versa if the attic one goes off, but the others don't.
If you do this one at a time, you should be able to isolate the problem
unit.
One question though... I assume that at least two of the units have more
than one red wire going into the hole (or a splice in the wire itself.)
Is that a correct assumption. (should be the ones on the 1st and 2nd
floors)
Bob
|
294.43 | Use a bigger hammer | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Wed Oct 19 1988 18:53 | 18 |
| I had smoke alarms that couldn't be taken apart either.
So I took them apart anyway. I had to break off one of
the mounting tabs that were supposed to keep the thing
sealed together, but I avoided breaking the other and so
they fit back together well enough.
The earlier note about dust on the black plastic reflector
was exactly the problem I had. Even with the thing in my
hand, blowing wouldn't dislodge the dust. Nothing but
firm wiping would do it.
So if you can find out which one is setting off the alarms,
I would advise you to buy a replacement. Then go ahead and
see if you can get it open -- if you break it completely,
well, it was already broken & needed replacing anyway.
Luck,
Larry
|
294.44 | Success!!! | CIVIC::WEBER | | Fri Oct 21 1988 09:22 | 18 |
| Success!!
I want to thank everyone for their great assistance. I was able
to isolate the problem detector. When we got it down we were able
to locate a spider web inside. I got the spider web out but when
I tested it it went off again. The next step was to take a very
strong suctioned vacuum to it. It has worked great ever since.
AFter all this I happended to mention to my neighbor my troubles.
She said that when one of theirs had gone off she'd gone to M&M
Hardware (nashua) to replace it. The folks there said that the
company had discontinued that model as they'd had lots of problems
with it. They gave her another brand/model which works great. It
was only $11 and compatible with the othe brand she had.
Thanks again,
nancy
|
294.45 | Small spider, big noise. | LUDWIG::BOURGAULT | I have a story to tell..... | Mon Apr 24 1989 04:39 | 51 |
|
Now that I have stumbled across people with similar
problems, let me tell you my experience:
It was a Thursday evening in late February. About
6:30 the family had dropped what it was doing, washed
up, said grace, and was finally starting to eat supper.
Conversation with the two boys had started (what did
you do in school today?), things were generally
relaxed, when suddenly the smoke detector "right
over our heads" (about 8 feet away, but it sounded
like....) let loose a 3-second scream of alarm.
I just KNEW that it couldn't be from cooking.... we
have "preventing false alarms" down to a routine by now.
When we do something in the oven, the wife calls for me
to remove covers, and slide batteries to "disconnect"
power before she opens the oven. (The covers get put
on the dinner table.... to make SURE we remember to
reverse the process before eating!) We hadn't even
used the oven tonight....
The relaxed atmosphere was gone... even the two boys
were sniffing, expecting smoke. I jumped when the
alarm went off for another couple of seconds... then
made a quick circuit of the house - sniffing, checking
the oil burner (not running), etc. - to see what was
causing it. With the rest of the family still ready
to walk outside, I pulled the cover off the offending
detector, thinking maybe the battery was loose in the
clips, or some similar thing was causing a momentary
loss of power, and the "test" that goes off when you
plug the battery back in.
What I found was a spider. Just a small, whitish spider,
that waved its legs at me... then started to walk. As it
did, it walked across the "detector" part of the smoke
detector. One of its legs went through a slot in the
outer metal piece, and touched something inside....
The detector screamed again, the spider ran, and the alarm
quit. I started laughing..... I don't know if the poor
creature was (electric) shocked, or the sound scared it, but
boy did it move!!
I explained to the family, and everybody relaxed. I replaced
the detector cover, and went back to my meal. There were no
further interruptions.....
- Ed -
|
294.46 | what do you do when there's no OFF switch? | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Mon Apr 24 1989 13:47 | 13 |
| Sort of related...
My detectors are wired into the electrical circuit. Therefore there are no
batteries to disconnect when it goes off by mistake. Removing the cover does't
help either and I have to literally unplug the wiring from it.
So say the least, this is a royal pain, especially since when one goes off all
three go off and if you don't unplug the one that started the whole mess it
doesn't help.
Does anybody else have this problem?
-mark
|
294.47 | | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Mon Apr 24 1989 15:21 | 9 |
| re: .40
Yes. We just throw the circuit breaker. The only times this has
happened to us was when we were first learning how to use the wood
stove, and once from the steam coming out of the bathroom. Since
the same circuit controls the bathroom lights, we don't forget to
turn it back on.
Gary
|
294.48 | Let it all hang out | LDP::BURKHART | Get that out of your mouth | Mon Apr 24 1989 16:42 | 13 |
| RE .40
Yes, we have the same problem but have a pretty good
routine to unplug the kitchen detector. We have a little stool
that sits close by and most of the time just un-twisting the the
detector from the mounting plate and letting it hang down the 6
inches from it's wires will silence the thing. If not the wires
disconnect with a quick disconnect connector about as quick as a
battery connector. The biggest problem I have is reconnecting
it's hard to line up the slots with the prongs on the mounting
plate.
...Dave
|
294.49 | False alarms may show a real problem | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Thu Apr 27 1989 10:19 | 16 |
| I've been having "false alarms" on and off since midwinter. No smoke,
no unusual smells, but the furnace was always on when it happened.
I finally brought my oil man out to check the furnace, and he discovered
that the chimney was full from the bottom up to where the furnace vent
entered it -- about 4 feet. So apparently wind was occasionally causing
a backdraft and pushing fumes out into my basement, where there is a smoke
dector right next to the furnace.
He shoveled out 1/2 a foot or so of the stuff; now I need to get a
chimney sweep to handle the rest -- I could do it myself, but no way
am I going to! That stuff smells *awful*. I suppose an air shredder
would help too, but I don't think it's necessary in this case.
Enjoy,
Larry
|
294.50 | | MEMORY::BROWER | Bob Brower, SHR1-4 | Thu Apr 27 1989 11:47 | 9 |
| re:40
Yes I had it happen about a month ago in the middle of the day.
I pulled them all apart and cleaned them. At 1:30 the next morning
they went off again. I pulled them all and put up a battery one
for now in a central hallway. I'm considering replacing them all
with somthing more up to date as the house is 9 years old and the
hard-wired detectors were put in when the house was built.
bob
|
294.51 | My shower sets mine off sometimes | VICKI::DODIER | | Fri Apr 28 1989 10:42 | 15 |
| I've seen times where cooking has set them off (and times where
my cooking should have set them off :-). If I get enough humidity
(as in steam) it reacts the same way as smoke in some detectors.
The way it was explained to me is that some detectors work by
looking at the output of a infrared sensor that has an infrared light
source (LED) shining at it. If something gets in between the LED and
the sensor (i.e. smoke, steam) the output of the sensor drops and the
alarm goes off.
Cleaning the LED/sensor should help to reduce the number of
false alarms but you may also want to consider the location in the
proximity of the bathroom and oven.
Ray
|
294.52 | | NSSG::FEINSMITH | I'm the NRA | Fri Apr 28 1989 11:08 | 5 |
| Actually, the photoelectric type don't have light on the photocell all
the time. They are looking for light to bounce off the smoke particles
and hit the photocell only when necessary.
Eric
|
294.53 | Steak-Alert!! | WEFXEM::COTE | The fool screams no more... | Fri Apr 28 1989 13:05 | 5 |
| After much experimentation, I've finally found the perfect location
for the smoke detector so it goes off precisely when a 1" steak
hits medium-rare in the broiler...
Edd
|
294.54 | Just think of it as a self-test... | TEKTRM::REITH | Jim Reith DTN 235-8459 HANNAH::REITH | Wed May 03 1989 10:12 | 10 |
| One warm night last year our neighbor called to see if everything was alright
since they had heard out detector go off. We explained that the grill on our
Jenn-Air had just finished our steak for dinner... A week later they presented
us with a refrigerator magnet that says:
"If the smoke detector's going off, dinner must be ready"
Bad placement of the 1st floor detector seems the culprit. We all know which
breaker to throw to stop the noise and it always gets reset since my daughters'
bedroom lights are on the same breaker "DAAAADDDDDY! My lights are off!"
|
294.55 | Blow it off | VICKI::DODIER | | Wed May 03 1989 16:50 | 4 |
| BTW - A quick way to temporarily stop a nuicense alarm is to
blow into the sensor.
Ray
|
294.70 | Lightning Hit effecting smoke detectors | AKOV12::LESHIN | | Mon May 22 1989 10:36 | 10 |
| I took some sort of hit from the lightning this weekend. The problem
is my smoke detectors do not turn off. I have electric smoke detectors
on four levels and I have the to shut the circuit breaker off. The
only other thing on this line is an outside light that has a photo-cell
on it. This light does not shut either. Is it possable that a shorted
photo-cell could turn the smoke detecors on.
Lost my garage door opener also.
Lloyd
|
294.71 | Relax, you're covered - probably | CIMNET::MOCCIA | | Mon May 22 1989 12:56 | 4 |
| Contact your homeowner's insurance agency.
pbm
|
294.72 | | TLE::PATT | | Mon May 22 1989 16:24 | 5 |
|
This happened to me about 4 years ago, and I had to get all three
smoke detectors replaced. In my case, all three got zapped by the
strike.
|
294.73 | Check bulb first | HAMRAD::DONADT | | Wed May 24 1989 13:30 | 8 |
| Make sure that the small bulb in the smoke detector is still good.
If one bulb burns out in my system, all smoke detectors will sound
until turned off at breaker or the bad bulb replaced. These are
long life bulbs and should last 5-6 years so make sure you get the
right replacement. You may have a spare bulb located inside the
detector housing.
Ray
|
294.56 | Can't live with 'em, can't live without 'em | ATSE::GOODWIN | | Wed May 24 1989 14:34 | 15 |
| Blow in its sensor and it'll follow you anywhere.
In one house I had the kind that connect to the AC and are all wired
together -- one upstairs, one down, and one in the basement.
First the one upstairs went off every time someone took a shower then
opened the bathroom door. Wakes you up better than coffee, I'll tell
ya. We had a new detector put in and that problem went away.
Then they started going off at random. We disconnected one at a time,
until they stopped going off for a couple of days, and found that the
one in the basement was the culprit. When I took the cover off, I
found lots of rust inside -- no idea how or when it got wet. Another
replacement solved that problem.
|
294.74 | Isolate them from each other | NRADM::BROUILLET | You can listen as well as you hear | Thu May 25 1989 08:45 | 3 |
| Smoke detectors are usually wired together, so that if one goes off,
they all go sound an alarm. Try disconnecting that wire from each
detector to see if only one is faulty.
|
294.75 | What brand | ELWOOD::MILLAR | | Tue May 30 1989 12:52 | 4 |
| What brand detectors are these??
Any chance they are made by Edwards Co.????? If so it may just be
a blown diode if they are low voltage units..
|
294.76 | Smoke detector on the fritz | VAXWRK::OXENBERG | Apocalyptical Illusion | Wed Aug 23 1989 11:04 | 13 |
|
Hi. I have 3 smoke detectors in my house. At least I believe that's
what they are (maybe they're heat detectors). Anyway, they do not run
on batteries. The other night one of them went off in the middle of
the night with a relatively low volume buzz, as opposed to the loud,
course buzz it normally makes when you press the test button. Does it
need to be replaced? The other two test fine. To stop the noise, I
dropped the plate from the ceiling and disconnected the wire (plug) to
it. Any suggestions?
Thanks.
Phil
|
294.77 | | CLOSUS::HOE | Sammy sit! Dad needs a breath! | Wed Aug 23 1989 11:19 | 8 |
| Phil,
The smoke detectors you mentioned are wired together to trigger
the other alarms to give you the whole house warning. Usually, if
batteries are dying, they chirp at regular intervals. Recommend
replacing them with alkaline batteries.
cal
|
294.78 | They're batteryless! | VAXWRK::OXENBERG | Apocalyptical Illusion | Wed Aug 23 1989 11:50 | 7 |
| Cal,
As I mentioned in base note, these are not batteried powered and
the "faulty" one didn't chirp, but emitted a constant buzz of less
amplitude than one normally hears when it fires off.
Phil
|
294.79 | Try the keyword listing 1111 | OASS::B_RAMSEY | only in a Jeep... | Wed Aug 23 1989 13:19 | 3 |
| Have you looked at the other notes about smoke detectors. They
can be found using the keyword Safety, 1111.86. Try looking at
note 2487 with the title _Why smoke detectors go off for no reason?_
|
294.80 | battery backup | CTOAVX::BALDYGA | | Wed Aug 23 1989 15:07 | 13 |
|
phil,
the hard-wired electric detectors normally have batteries for backup
during power outages. i believe this is what cal was referring
to. try changing the battery, or repositioning the one in there.
if there isn't a battery backup, the detectors may not be up to
code.
i had to replace two in my house in n.h. for that reason.
ed.
|
294.81 | maybe one bad detector | FRSBEE::VISCO | | Wed Aug 23 1989 16:07 | 10 |
| Enviormental polutients used in the house can raise havic with smoke
detectors. I refinished the floors in my house a few years ago.
and from what I am told the fumes from the poliurethane will cause
the detection elements to become erratic in their operation. I had
smoke detectors going off at all hours of the day.
It sounds like you have hardwired units, and they would be wired
in parallel, if one goes off they all go off, you might have one
bad detector in the group. I keep my system in good repair the
one time you might need it you want it to function properly.
|
294.82 | | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | Week 7: Final inspection (but still more to do) | Wed Aug 23 1989 20:04 | 6 |
| I don't recall seeing hardwired detectors with battery backup. I have
seen ones without backup for sale in both MA and NH, and I'm pretty
sure that the MA code requires hardwires detectors without requiring
battery backup.
Gary
|
294.83 | Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz | VAXWRK::OXENBERG | Apocalyptical Illusion | Fri Aug 25 1989 13:23 | 6 |
| re: .5 They appear to be wired in parallel, only one went off and
when I disconnected it, the others still "tested" fine.
re: .6 I haven't seen any batteries in there.
|
294.57 | Defective Units in the Field | TRITON::FERREIRA | | Fri Aug 25 1989 14:09 | 18 |
| I've just built a new Post-n-Beam home and installed interconected
smoke detectors. The wood is still very wet and renders the house
extremely humid. The detectors we used are "BRK Electronics"
Model # 1839WI-12. The chirp at random and process of elimination
points the finger at every one. Just called the company, they are
aware of a batch of the "Overly sensative units" and are sending
out the replacement units, 2-3 week lead time. It's nice that
they are replacing them and would have been nicer with better
QC on there end. Now I'll keep my fingers crossed hoping they
won't be needed. Better yet I'll pick-up a battery unit or two
til the replacements arrive.
BRK Electronics
Div. of Pittway Corp.
780 McClure Rd.
Aurora, Illinois 60504-2495
Customer Service (312) 851-7330
|
294.84 | | HDLITE::HORTON | Ken Horton, KA1GFN | Mon Aug 28 1989 09:09 | 10 |
| My condo unit has hard-wired detectors. The power is wired in parallel but
there is a control line which runs between both of them. If one goes off then
they both will. If you disconnect one of them then it will have no effect on
the other one. Connect them both, press the test button on one and have someone
check if the other one goes off. Also if it has this feature then it would have
to have 3 or more wires connected to each unit.
My smoke detectors do not have a battery back-up but I beleieve the company
does offer a central back-up unit. It has been awhile since I looked at the data
sheet.
|
294.85 | its done w/ mirrors | WEFXEM::DICASTRO | POST NO BILLS HERE | Wed Aug 30 1989 08:26 | 11 |
| Vacuume all (3?) of them. Dust collects in them and can cause false
alarms. I used to work for an alarm co.( 3 yrs)and pressurized air
or a light vaccuming cured most "smoke detector false alarms) I believe
there is a cavity in the detector which has a light source and a
light sensor. Sometimes there is also a mirror (light reflects onto
mirror to sensor) if the mirror gets dusty the sensor sees a diminished
amount of light (like it was smokey in the room).
hope it helps
|
294.86 | Smoke Detectors | USEM::SPENCE | | Thu Oct 26 1989 13:40 | 21 |
|
Some interesting comments on Smoke Detectors
Most of us have battery operated Smoke Detectors, however I bet
most of us feel secure because the alarm will cherp when the batteries
are low or almost dead. Some interesting things I heard is that
most of us are out alot and when your smoke alarm battery goes dead
some of them may only "cherp" an hour or two. Of course we then
come home to think the batteries are fine and could go months before
we find out its dead. I know there's a national campaign to have
people check their batteries the same time we turn our clocks forward
and back during the spring and fall. Interesting thing about alarms
hard-wired to the home can also fail if the fire starts in the fuse
box or some other electrical part of the home. The fire could short
out the whole house and no alarm will sound. They reccomend a battery
operated back-up. They also gave the percentage of homes that have
taken the batteries out so they can cook or take a shower and are
never replaced. I found this article interesting and thought I'd
share it.
|
294.87 | 2497, 3251, 3438 | OASS::B_RAMSEY | half a bubble off plumb | Thu Oct 26 1989 19:39 | 25 |
|
I think this is important information and should be reposted because
of its topic. I have write locked this but have also reposted it.
The standard write lock note follows...
This note has been temporarily write-locked pending approval of the author.
To the author: This subject is already under discussion in this file, under
the topics listed in the title. Please look at these notes; you may find that
your question is already answered, or you may find a note where your question
would be an appropriate continuation of the discussion. Note that since
nearly everyone uses NEXT UNSEEN to read notes, your question will get the
same exposure whether it is a response to a two-year-old note or it is its own
new note. These topics were found using the keyword directory (note 1111), and
you may find other notes relating to this subject by examining the directory
yourself.
We do, however, welcome new notes if they explore a specific aspect of a
problem that may be under general discussion. And this moderator has been
known to make mistakes. :^) So if after examining these notes, you wish to
continue the discussion here, send me mail.
Bruce [Moderator]
|
294.58 | Keep the Batteries Fresh | OASS::B_RAMSEY | half a bubble off plumb | Thu Oct 26 1989 19:43 | 33 |
|
Reposted by the moderator because of possible implications of topic
if not noticed. (Sorry, being a volunteer fireman I have strong
beliefs in this area.)
<<< JOET::DUA1:[000000.NOTES$LIBRARY]HOME_WORK.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Better living through DIY >-
================================================================================
Note 3552.0 Smoke Detectors 1 reply
USEM::SPENCE 21 lines 26-OCT-1989 12:40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some interesting comments on Smoke Detectors
Most of us have battery operated Smoke Detectors, however I bet
most of us feel secure because the alarm will cherp when the batteries
are low or almost dead. Some interesting things I heard is that
most of us are out alot and when your smoke alarm battery goes dead
some of them may only "cherp" an hour or two. Of course we then
come home to think the batteries are fine and could go months before
we find out its dead. I know there's a national campaign to have
people check their batteries the same time we turn our clocks forward
and back during the spring and fall. Interesting thing about alarms
hard-wired to the home can also fail if the fire starts in the fuse
box or some other electrical part of the home. The fire could short
out the whole house and no alarm will sound. They reccomend a battery
operated back-up. They also gave the percentage of homes that have
taken the batteries out so they can cook or take a shower and are
never replaced. I found this article interesting and thought I'd
share it.
|
294.59 | cold weather affects | VWBUG::SCHNEIDER | Joe Schneider | Thu Dec 06 1990 10:34 | 24 |
| Since this note has been quiet for awhile...
I'm not sure what is causing the smoke alarms to go off, but it has been
very early in the morning, like 1AM or 5:30AM, etc.
The system is hardwired and has only been giving me the wake-up call
for about one month. Only four times. I have two in the basement
one on the first and second floors, one in the attic since it has
stairs to an unfinished unheated space, and one in the attached garage.
Town code placed them for us.
I know it wasnt' the furnance, the shower, and they have all been
cleaned. Could it be that the cold, below freezing is setting the
attic or garage to go off ?
The manual says not to use if below 40F. But I haven't been able to
find if there are special detectors for outside/below freezing usage.
Any better info will be appreciated. I dont like having to keep them
turned off. I have a new baby and this is very nerve-racking not
having the smoke detectors operational.
Thanks
JS
|
294.60 | Heat detector vs smoke detector | CIMNET::MOCCIA | | Thu Dec 06 1990 12:07 | 11 |
| Re .53
Our professionally-installed system has smoke detectors only in the
heated living space in the house. In the garage, the only suitable
unit was a temperature detector, since smoke detectors, as you noted,
don't work below 40F. Obviously, I don't know if this is related
to your false alarms, but at least you are now aware that there are
alternatives for cold environments.
pbm
|
294.61 | | TLE::FELDMAN | Larix decidua, var. decify | Thu Dec 06 1990 12:33 | 22 |
| The detector in our unheated addition has never given us problems, even
though I'm reasonably sure it gets below 40 degrees there. In the garage,
we were required to put in a temperature detector. The fire chief, and the
people responsible for our code, know that putting a smoke detector into
a garage is an invitation to disable the entire system, so they don't even
allow that option.
Do you know which detector is tripping? Some brands use the indicator light
to distinguish the detector that tripped because of smoke from the ones that
are sounding because they received a signal from a tripped detector. The next
time they go off on you, look at the lights on all detectors before turning
off the alarm. The one that's different - perhaps blinking, while the others
are on steady, or perhaps on, while the others are off, or whatever - is the
one that tripped. Then, if you can't isolate a cause for it to trip, try
replacing it.
A good electrical supply shop may be of more help than typical hardware or
building supply stores, which tend to focus on the battery powered detectors.
The electrical supply shop may even be able to locate a detector for you
designed to work in colder temperatures.
Gary
|
294.62 | | HYEND::C_DENOPOULOS | Men Are Pigs, And Proud Of It! | Thu Dec 06 1990 12:51 | 4 |
| Since it's winter, cold and dry, you don't have a humidifier running in
your house, do you?
Chris D.
|
294.63 | trouble in river city | CSTVAX::SCHULMAN | SANFORD | Thu Dec 06 1990 13:17 | 7 |
| two step approach.
First take each one down and using a blower (I've used my shop vac)
blow out any dust that might be periodically causing a problem.
If that doesn't work, disconnect one and see if you can isolate the one
having the problem (unless you can run around and see which one is by
the lights). Once you've isolated the culprit, replace it.
Good luck=========SANFORD========
|
294.64 | I had a similar problem. | MARX::SULLIVAN | We have met the enemy, and they is us! | Mon Dec 10 1990 12:37 | 14 |
| I had the same problem. I solved it by cleaning.
I was able to locate the one that was tripping by using the light signals.
The lignt on the one that had tripped stayed on until reset.
My problem was caused by a moth that had wedged itself under the cover and
died. The dust from his body/wings must have set it off. I vacumned it several
times but it still kept going off. I was about to invest in a new one when
I tried one more thing. I used a can of "Dust Off" (compressed air in a can
sold at photography shops for cleaning cameras and lenses) to blast what must
have been the microscopic dust from the unit. It has been working great
ever since (and I have tested it).
Mark
|
294.91 | Smoke detectors going off too easily | BEDAZL::GAZZARA | | Fri Nov 15 1991 10:20 | 22 |
| Hopefully someone out there can help me. I'm having a problem with
the smoke detectors in my home. They go off at all different times
of the day and evening for unknown reasons. They're electric and
we have one on every floor (basement,main, 2nd floor), when one goes
off, they all do.
Interestingly this problem only seems to happen during the year when
we put the heat on, so I tend to think it has something to do with
the furnace exhaust.
My husband and I have cleaned the detectors, switched them around,
and even took the one out of the basement (capped the wires), because
we thought the furnace exhaust my have been setting them off. Our
home is only two years old and we change the filter in the furnace
often... to avoid any unnecessary exhaust.
Does anyone have any suggestions? We're considering replacing all
three, but I don't think the dectectors are defected since the problem
only seems to occur during the heating season.
Thanks in advance.
|
294.92 | Electrical noise? | STAR::DZIEDZIC | | Fri Nov 15 1991 11:49 | 22 |
| For some versions of inter-connected detectors, there is a light
on the detector (usually an LED somewhere) which will light when
THAT detector triggers. You can use this to help determine if
there is a single POSITION (basement, 1st floor, etc.) which is
the point of "failure". (Note that since you've already switched
detectors one would assume "failure" here means "a location which
is prone to false triggering".) There may be air currents or such
which cause a false trigger. Then again, maybe you have a VERY
air-tight house and there is some amount of backdrafting (furnace
exhaust fumes making their way into the house) which triggers a
detector.
Is there a chance the detectors are wired onto the same branch
circuit as the furnace? There may be an electrical spike caused
by the furnace motor starting which could falsely trigger the (a)
detector. (In our house the attic light is on the detector branch;
when I turn the attic light on all the detectors "chirp" - kinda
neat so I can tell if the kids are sneaking up there to play!)
I believe there is a requirement in either the NEC or local
variations which requires detectors to be on a circuit which, if
the breaker tripped, you'd be sure to notice quickly - this is
often the basement lights, but not always.
|
294.93 | | ELWOOD::LANE | | Fri Nov 15 1991 11:50 | 11 |
| Are they on the same electrical circuit as the heater, by any chance? Maybe
noise.
I have the same kind of setup. I had one go bad and start going off at weird
times. Does the brand you have light the indicator when it fires? Mine do.
You can tell which is triggering all the rest - it's light is lit, all the
others still blink.
Anyway, if you can find the bad one, replace just it.
Mickey.
|
294.94 | | BEDAZL::GAZZARA | | Fri Nov 15 1991 13:03 | 42 |
| Thanks for the response so far.
They are not on the same electrical circut as the furnace. They're on
the same circut as kitchen, dinning room and upstairs hall lights.
Good point about checking which LED light is lit, and which ones blink.
I'll watch for that.
Retracing a bit here... I know it's not the basement detector because
as I said in .0 we took that one out and the alarm still went off....
I'd like to rule out the vibration/noise because the problem is
intermittent ... sometimes the detector won't go off for 2 days and
then out of the blue it'll happen. So, the vibration of the furnace
starting would cause it to happen more regularly wouldn't you think?
Interestly, when I walk upstairs to the bedrooms, about 1/2 up I can
usually feel a slight wind/gush. So, it's possible that that's what
setting it off. The dectector is right at the top of the stairs. We
have forced hot air oil heat.
If the dectectors are not defective, I'm still not sure how to solve
the problem. We don't want to buy new dectectors, because if it's a
wind draft, the same situation will continue to happen. I don't like
the idea of removing any of them ... for safety reason. I assume we
could just reposition the one that is setting off, but then would it
be inaffective?
This is causing many unnerving nights... the dectector has been going
off at 2:00 a.m. - waking up to that is awful ... you don't know if
there really is a fire or just the alarm. It's gotten to the point
where the alarm has gone off so many times that the kids are now
sleeping through it.
Since the detector is on the same circut as the kitchen lights, and
even though I haven't seen any problems there ... is it still possible
that there's a short in the wiring? Because now that I think of it,
occassionally the kitchen doorbell doesn't work and that's on the same
circut. Maybe I should just have an electrician check things out.
Anyone recommend a reasonable yet good electrian in the southern NH
area?
Thanks.
|
294.95 | something in the air? | AKOCOA::CWALTERS | | Fri Nov 15 1991 14:21 | 25 |
|
Are these ionisation smoke detectors? If so, the problem could be
caused by particles/fumes that are blown out by the
furnace. Sometimes these detectors are "hair trigger" and will be set off
by airborne particles that you cannot see or smell - even the water
vapour from a shower or boiling kettle.
Change the furnace filter?
Get the furnace checked for clean burn? May be some combustion gases
getting into the circulation side.
Had any other work done such as painting, insulating or
weatherproofing?
Rgards
C.
|
294.96 | It's possible ... | BEDAZL::GAZZARA | | Fri Nov 15 1991 15:28 | 18 |
| The burner has already been serviced. Like I said earlier, we removed
the detector from the basement, so there's no way that the exhaust from
the furnace could be causing this.... the detector would still have to
be installed down there for it to go off.
We did recently paint in the house, however this exact same problem
occured last year at the same time (fall/winter), as soon as we start
turning the heat on. The only difference is that this year it's
happening more frequently.
You're right though...it could be something in the air. Since we
have forced hot air, the house can get really dry and I'm sure
particles of dust move more freely. We run a humidifier, but have not
turned the large one on yet.
Thanks for the input... the more people give their opinions/suggestions
the closer we come to solving this problem. I'm going to try and
troubleshoot the situation with some of the suggestions so far.
|
294.97 | Leaky heat exchanger? | HDECAD::THOMAS | Stop, look and listen | Fri Nov 15 1991 15:41 | 8 |
| It is not uncommon for hot air furnaces to develop leaks allowing
combustion gases to leak into the circulated air. I don't know if there
is a simple way of verifying the integrity of the heat exchanger but I
would be very suspect of it until proven otherwise.
You might consider getting a battery operated smoke detector and see if
it also falses. If so, you almost certainly have a potentially serious
problem with the furnace.
|
294.98 | It doesn't take much | STUDIO::HAMER | complexity=technical immaturity | Fri Nov 22 1991 14:22 | 10 |
| I second the notion of checking the heat exchanger for leaks.
Combustion products can be tricky things and ionization detectors don't
need billowing clouds a acrid smoke to go off.
One of our hotwired smoke detectors was set off repeatedly by the
plumber using his torch to sweat some pipes in another room. There was
no visible smoke, there was no apparent odor, there was no noticeable
draft.
John H.
|
294.99 | Get it checked! | SSDEVO::JACKSON | Jim Jackson | Fri Nov 22 1991 15:27 | 10 |
| The heat exchanger cracked badly on one of my FHA furnaces, and the whole
furnace had to be replaced. The service man showed be the symptom: the
flame sound changes when the blower comes on, to more of a "roar". This is
because of the vacuum caused by the air blowing through the heat exchanger
sucks at the flame (that's a technical description).
We've had one family killed and several families hospitalized here in
Colorado Springs in the past two years due to faulty heat exchangers on
furnaces. If I had the slightest question about my furnace, I'd pop for the
$30 or so to get a professional in to check it.
|
294.100 | Check the furnace now! | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Fri Nov 22 1991 17:32 | 28 |
| I second what .8 said.
I had the chance to meet a woman who had had the misfortune to be
poisoned by carbon monoxide *for ten years!*.
It is a bit of a story, but the short version is that the
neighboring condo owners vent pipe was (intentionally) blocked by workmen
who were working on the neighbors unit. The gasses seeped into my
friends unit and slowly poisoned her. For some reason she got it much
worse than her neighbor. The sicker she got, the more time she spent at
home, etc...
After about ten years of this, the neighbor needed more work done
on her furnace. As a result the blockage was discovered and corrected.
My friend is starting to fell much better, but she lost a big
chunk of her life to being sick.
The moral? Fire and the gasses they produce are not worth screwing
up within your home. If your smoke detectors are going off find out
why. Get your furnace checked out thouroughly. Do the detectors go off
only during heating season? Will they go off on warm days when the
windows are open? If you answered "yes" to the first question and "no"
to the second I'd take a long hard look at the furnace!
regards,
Mark
|
294.101 | | CSC32::GORTMAKER | Whatsa Gort? | Fri Nov 22 1991 19:28 | 13 |
| re.8 &.9
Here in Colorado Springs the Gas Department will inspect your furnace
free of charge by telling them you think you might have a problem and
would like to be checked for CO. Call 520-0100. BTW- if they find you
have a problem they will "red tag" the furnace on the spot I.E. shut it
down and you will need to have repairs made before it can be relit.
I have called them at midnight-thirty after returning home to a gas
smell responce was less than 15 minutes.
-j
|
294.102 | | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Mon Nov 25 1991 12:20 | 2 |
| I am not surprised that they respond so quickly. If they didn't they
would probably loose customers... *literally*!
|
294.65 | | MILPND::J_TOMAO | | Wed Sep 01 1993 09:52 | 19 |
| O.k. - I'v eread all 58 replies and I will try to vacuum mine out - but
I can't get the cover off to clean it.
Tuesday morning my detector went off after I opened the bathroom door -
since I've been living there since April and this was not the first
shower I had taken there, I was wondering why now did it decide to go
off. Since it wouldn't shut off I just unplugged it. I tried plugging
it back in before I left for work but it went off again. When I got
home last night I tried plugging it in again but it was still going off
as soon as I made the connection.
Soooo... I'm sitting here at work holding my CODEONE 2000 smoke alarm
and can't seem to pry the cover off. Did any of you who vacuumed your
detector do it while it was in one piece? What else could be casuing
it to go off? Its not even close to a burner or a kitchen stove - so
what else could it be?
Thanks
Joyce
|
294.66 | Look honey, I made you blackened toast | VICKI::DODIER | Food for thought makes me hungry | Wed Sep 01 1993 10:56 | 18 |
| There is probably a good "theory of operation" example in the
electro_hobby notes file or possibly here even (haven't read all the
notes), but I'll take a wack it. From what I understand, many detectors
work by shining an infra-red light at a sensitive detector. If airborn
particles of anything get between the light and the sensor, the sensor
gets a lower reading. If the reading gets low enough, it triggers the
alarm.
Over time, dust gets in the sensor area which may partially block
the sensor and/or the light. This causes the sensor to get a lower
reading, but not low enough to trip the alarm. At this point, the sensor
is more sensitive to things like steam, which is just airborn particles
of water. This is why the shower or cooking may set it off.
I have never seen one that the cover didn't come off. I have seen
some with tight, hard to remove covers. I suspect that's what you have.
Ray
|
294.67 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Sep 01 1993 11:58 | 5 |
| There are some with non-removable covers. These have the battery in a
drawer that pops out from the side. In this case, just run a vacuum over
the grille.
Steve
|
294.68 | | MACROW::SEVIGNY | Lots of Rules, No Mercy | Wed Sep 01 1993 17:20 | 6 |
|
The steam from the shower sets my smoke detector off, too. I moved it
away from the influence of the shower. I guess steam and smoke look
similar to my detector. :-)
|
294.69 | | MILPND::J_TOMAO | | Thu Sep 02 1993 10:47 | 9 |
| Well even though I couldn't get the cover off the detector I vacuumed
it out - thoroughly and plugged it back in...not a peep all night.
I do remember reading somewhere that while vacuuming your rugs you
should also vacuum behind and under the fridge and the smoke detector -
now I know why.....
Thanks for all the info
Joyce
|
294.88 | line voltage/battery backup/daisy-chained/silencer | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, PATHWORKS for Windows NT | Tue Jan 04 1994 23:44 | 17 |
| Well this seems to be the most generic topic on smoke
detectors so I guess it's as good as any ....
Does anyone know of a brand of smoke detectors that has
all these features:
line voltage
battery backup
can be daisy-chained to all go off together
have a "silencer" button to silence false alarms (in kitchen)
Home Depot in Nashua carries a brand (FireX I believe) that has
the first three (3) features, but not the silencer feature.
And the First Alert brand at Home Depot has one with the silencer
feature but not all the other features.
Thanks!
|
294.89 | Seaman's electrical | BROKE::TAYLOR | Holiday shoppers wear my brakes out | Wed Jan 12 1994 13:02 | 10 |
| Try Seaman's electrical supply on Progress Ave in Nashua. It's just
off exit 5 on the west side of Rt. 3, near the cheap motel right near
the southbound Rt 3 on-ramp, across from Domino's Pizza. They carry the
FireX brand, which does show that functionality of the silencer button
in the info sheets that accompany a new detector, although I'm not
positive about the battery backup being available on the same units.
Seeing the battery backup FireX units at Home Depot makes me wonder if
they do make one with all of those features.
Mike
|
294.90 | Fyronetics | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, PATHWORKS for Windows NT | Wed Jan 12 1994 15:09 | 5 |
| > Try Seaman's electrical supply on Progress Ave in Nashua.
Thanks, good pointer. Turns out FireX doesn't have a model with
all the features, but he has a Fyronetics (sp?) brand which does
and they retail for $14.88.
|
294.103 | Smoke Detector Recall | HDLITE::FLEURY | | Mon Jan 24 1994 07:10 | 73 |
|
I received the following notice from BOCA. I am posting it here
because of its importance. Note: The Firex brand was recalled some
time ago for other problems but there are still many units being used.
Please check any units you currenty are using.
Dan
Defective alarm prompts recall of battery powered smoke detectors
Product: Certain models and date codes of battery operated smoke
detectors manufactured by Seatt Corporation sold after
July 10, 1992 by the following firms:
Black and Decker Walter Kidde Portable Equipment
Safety First Jameson Home Products
Maple Chase Funtech
Problem: The smoke detectors may not sound in the event of a fire.
What to do: If you purchased a smoke detector on or after July 10, 1992,
check the label on the back for the involved models and date
codes. If you have an affected unit, call
1-800-952-1331 for Black and Decker units;
(or return to Black and Decker service center)
1-800-492-4949 for all other brands.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Six brands of battery powered smoke detectors are being recalled
because they may not sound an alarm in hte event of a fire. Today, the
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), in cooperation with
Seatt Corporation, Downers Grove, Il. urged any consumer who purchased
a battery powered smoke detector on or after July 10, 1992 to check the
uniot immediately to see if it is involved in this recall. According
to information provided by Seatt Corporation, the brands and models
affected are listed below.
These battery powered smoke detectors were sold nationwide since July
10, 1992 in major retail and specialty stores. Approximately 120,000
affected smoke detectors are believed to be in use by consumers.
To determine if you have an affected smoke detector, examine the label
on the back of the smoke detector for the model and date codes listed
below. If the smoke detector has been installed remove the smoke
detector from its brackets by twisting the detector counterclockwise to
remove the detector from the wall and expose the label. Only the
listed models having the listed date codes are involved. Other date
codes of these models are NOT involved.
(Smoke detector)
FIRM BRAND MODEL DATE CODE
Black & Decker Slim Line SMK100 9228 to 9246
SMK200
SMK300
Jameson Home Products Inc. CODE 1 2000 Model A 92192 to 92231
Model C
Model D
Walter Kidde Portable Kidde Smoke KSA700 92192 to 92231
Equipment Inc. and Fire Alarm
Safety First Baby's room 244 92192 to 92231
Smoke and Fire Alarm
Funtech Safety's First Model A 92192 to 92231
Maple Chase Firex Model A 92192 to 92231
Model B
|
294.104 | Heat detector connected to smoke alarm?? | SOLVIT::CASEY | | Mon Feb 21 1994 11:58 | 13 |
| I am in the process of putting an adition on my house, there are three
rooms over a two car garage. I have 110V wired smoke detectors that I
can add another to for the living space but I wasted to add a heat
detector to the garage has anyone ever done this. What I would like to
happen is that in the event of a fire in the garage the heat detector
would go off and trigger the smoke detectors to sound. I called the
mfg. of the smoke detector and they indicated that this would violate
UL but did not comment whether it was safe. I am getting ready to do
sheetrock so any help would be great.
Thanks
Tom Casey
|
294.105 | Do it. | ICS::MCDONNELL | | Mon Feb 21 1994 12:37 | 5 |
| I don't know why they said it would violate UL. In Marlborough
the smokes and heat detectors must all be wired in on the same
circuit.
Dave
|
294.106 | residential vs commercial | SOLVIT::CASEY | | Mon Feb 21 1994 12:43 | 4 |
| She indicated that in residential it was a violation but was ok in a
commercial environment.
Tom
|
294.107 | It's done all the time. | MIYATA::LEMIEUX | | Mon Feb 21 1994 13:01 | 22 |
|
It will work and is done all the time. (UL problems would depend on the model)
The heat detector (normally open contacts and rated at 120V) gets placed across
the trigger leg from the smoke detector and the neutral leg from the smoke
detector.
One of the other notes also mentioned that in a lot of Mass. towns this is a
required method for protecting the garage. I've also had to do it for attic
spaces and boiler rooms.
Later
Paul
|
294.108 | question on interconnect wiring | LGP30::FLEISCHER | without vision the people perish (DTN 227-3978, TAY1) | Sat Jan 20 1996 15:23 | 20 |
| My house has 17-year-old Honeywell smoke detectors that are
beginning to act erratically. These are AC-powered units
wired together to sound together.
The problem I have is that the wiring used to support these
seems somewhat different from any detectors I've found on the
market. My Honeywell detectors are wired with a 2-wire AC
circuit plus a twisted pair of low-voltage (thermostat/bell)
wires.
The new detectors I've seen require only three wires. It is
not clear that the third (signal) wire can be low-voltage
wiring -- it would seem that the return path is on the power
neutral line (they are required to be all on the same
circuit).
Anyone know if the signal wire can be handled by unprotected
bell wire?
Bob
|
294.109 | | 19096::BUSKY | | Mon Jan 22 1996 07:41 | 20 |
| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The new detectors I've seen require only three wires. It is
> not clear that the third (signal) wire can be low-voltage
I just bought some new detectors to replace my aging/erratic
detectors as well. The interconnects on these seem to vary from
manufacturer to manufacturer and even between models by the same
manufacturer! For example the Firex brand that I got had a list of
several other Firex brands that it was compatible with BUT
apparently NOT ALL Firex brands!
But, the one that I did get, the instructions did list the specs
of the third signal wire/connection and it was in the low voltage
range. I got them at Home Depot this summer, I'm sure that they
still have them
I'll check one of the saved boxes tonight for the exact model
number and voltage specs if you're interested.
Charly
|
294.110 | | 19096::BUSKY | | Wed Jan 24 1996 08:33 | 26 |
| > Anyone know if the signal wire can be handled by unprotected
> bell wire?
I checked the instructions for the new Firex brand smoke dectors
that I got and YES the interconnect wire can be low voltage bell
wire.
Here's the interconnect section of the instructions for the Firex
brand, Model G Smoke Alarm.
INTERCONNECTING SMOKE ALARMS
IMPORTANT: Only the model G may be interconnected. Model H is a
singl-station smoke alarm.
- Use #18 AWG minimum solid or stranded wire. When intercon-
necting, maximum wire length between any two is 1,500 feet for
#18 AWG or 4,000 feet for #14 AWG (20 OHMS loop resistance).
- Model G smoke alarm may be interconnected with as many as 17
other Model G smoke alarms. DO NOT connect to any other type
or model smoke alarm.
- Connect smoke alarms to a single AC branch circuit. If local codes
do not permit, be sure the neutral wire is common to both phases.
|
294.111 | | LGP30::FLEISCHER | without vision the people perish (DTN 227-3978, TAY1) | Thu Jan 25 1996 13:59 | 7 |
| I also called the customer service number for Fyrnetics and
First Alert, and both of them claim that their interconnect
wire is low voltage (which makes some sense, since these
series interconnect with battery backed-up units, which are
likely to use low voltage signaling).
Bob
|
294.112 | 10 yr detectors? | WMOIS::FLECK_S | Love me, Love my dogs, cats, etc. | Tue Jul 09 1996 12:58 | 8 |
|
Does anyone have an opinion about these new smoke detectors
that are supposed to go 10 yrs. without having to change the
battery? I believe they run off of a lithium(?) battery.
Bradlees have them on sale for $10. Seems like a good price
to me, if they truly work. You'd hate to find out the hard way!
Sue
|
294.113 | | 2082::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Jul 09 1996 14:07 | 3 |
| No reason why they shouldn't work.
Steve
|
294.114 | an ounce of prevention | PCBUOA::TARDIFF | Dave Tardiff | Tue Jul 09 1996 14:14 | 19 |
| You can get wired-in detectors that don't rely on
battery power. Better ones have both - 110 volt line power,
batter backup. Mine are wired together, too - they all sound
if one goes off.
Checking your detectors regularly is a good idea anyway,
so I'm not too keen on the install-and-forget-for-10-years idea.
I had line-power only wired-together ones in my house, and a while
ago I got a few false alarms late at night (frightening, but no fire,
and good practice, I guess...). I probably fixed this by cleaning
them out (bugs and dust), but decided to replace them anyway (nearly
10 years old) and upgrade to the powered models with battery backup.
Even these only cost me $15 each, I think - pretty cheap insurance.
They have a steady green light, signifying 'on' with 110 power, and
a red flash once a minute, signifying battery ok.
Pick your favorite annual holiday, and declare that to be
replace-the-batteries day - start a tradition! And rehearse those
escape routes and meeting points!
|
294.115 | Smoke Detector Wiring Question | TBRY::ACKERLY | | Mon Feb 17 1997 17:18 | 26 |
| I'd like to know if anyone has any ideas to solve what I've run into:
In attempting to change a basement switched ceramic light fixture over
to a receptacle (for a florescent shop light), it appears that upon
disconnecting the wiring I set off a house full of smoke detectors.
I've determined the following:
1) The circuit breaker which runs the smoke detectors and the basement
lights was off so the smoke detectors apparently sense for continuity
in battery backup mode.
2) The smoke detectors are Firex brand and appear to use 3-wire Romex
with the red wire relaying a signal between the detectors and
returning on the white. This 3-wire Romex does not enter the
outlet box for the light fixture, and appears to go directly
from detector to detector.
3) There are 7 ceramic lights on the basement light switch and
I've replaced a different one before without setting off the
smoke detectors.
4) The detectors are not tied into the switch wiring by accident.
What I do not understand is given the above, it appears that the
detector would have to be before the switch in the circuit, effectively
forming their own continuity loop between the red and white wires,
so why does interrupting the switch/light fixture portion of the
circuit send the detectors into alarm?
Any help appreciated.
|
294.116 | the usual setup -did you short one out? | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | A Quinn Martin Production | Tue Feb 18 1997 07:02 | 27 |
| >> lights was off so the smoke detectors apparently sense for continuity
>> in battery backup mode.
The code went back and forth on this - "put them on the same breaker as
lighting so people will know when they are not working" or "isolate them on
their own breaker". I think its the first way (again) these days.
Your description of their wiring is correct. 14/3 RX is used to:
1- provide power (black/white)
2- provide a common trip (red) (ie one goes off, they all go off)
>> detector would have to be before the switch in the circuit, effectively
Yes they must be. Turn the lights off and hit the test button. My guess is
that they will work.
The Firex brand will usually give off a few chirps when they loose power also
but I take it when you said "they went off" you ment "THEY WENT OFF".
If you were doing your changes "live" you may have caused a spike in the line
and shorted out one of the smokes.
Unplug them all, then plug them back in one by one to see if you have a bad
one.
bjm
|