T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
183.1 | Does this sound right? | 5154::MORGAN | | Wed Apr 09 1986 15:27 | 15 |
| I don't have any suggestions regarding Nashua area roofers but we're
having ours stripped and reshingled also.
I do have a question though. A guy came over to look at the roof
this morning and told my wife that if there are currently spaced
boards underneath they'll have to be removed and replaced with plywood.
Something about a new law. Has anyone out there heard of this?
I replaced the porch roof last summer and the underlayment currently
there has spaced boards. Real 1" X 6" stuff. I would think this
is much stronger material compared to 1/2 or 3/4 plywood. Having
to replace this with plywood would obviously add a substantial cost
to our 2800 square foot area!
Steve
|
183.2 | Dunno | AUTHOR::MACDONALD | | Thu Apr 10 1986 09:49 | 8 |
| Spaced boards? Hmmm .. dunno. A call to Town Hall should provide
an answer to that. Did the contractor imply that the boards would
have to be replaced only if they stripped the old asphalt off? I
have plywood on my. Easy enough to tell where ice dams have built
up. Interior portion of the plywood along the edges of the roof
tend to delaminate over time from water.
Paul
|
183.3 | | WHOARU::HARDING | | Thu Apr 10 1986 10:15 | 11 |
| Sounds funny. The only problem I could see is if when nailing
down the new roof that you happen to hit the space between the
boards. I reroofed my porch several years ago. It had spaced
boards. I put down quarter inch plywood over them, then put down
the new roofing.
On an addition I put on I put down a 2 inch board along the edge
before I put down the rest of the plywood. If I have a problem
with rot on the edge, all I have to do is replace the edge board.
dave
|
183.4 | | LATOUR::PERKINS | | Thu Apr 10 1986 14:04 | 6 |
| re .0
Give Fred Noel of Noel Construction a call. I've seen his work
and he's very good. I have him do all my major work.
Steve
|
183.5 | Is he talking about particle board? | SYSENG::MORGAN | | Wed Apr 16 1986 14:47 | 18 |
| Re: .3 Concerning spaced boards
You're right in regard to the theory of putting the plywood over
the spaced boards. My wife mistakenly thought he said something
about it being a law.
I spoke to the contractor about his reasoning for the plywood.
He said that shingles were of different size way back when the spaced
boards were put down. He said that there would be times that they
would hit this space and they'd have to make adjustments. He also
said the finished product with the 1/4 inch covering would be much
better quality. I agreed.
Now I have a couple of questions. He said that they would use 1/4"
esponite (grabs the nail better?). Is this a cheap way out for him?
And is it worth the extra grand (96 - 4X8 sheets) to have this done?
Steve
|
183.6 | No particle board is different then esponite | CADLAC::HARDING | | Wed Apr 16 1986 17:32 | 8 |
| Personally I don't like esponite (I think the spellings wrong),
I used it on the walls of an addition and found it didn't have
the holding power of plywood, but its cheap. You could try
mohoginy_lawn (spellings definately not correct) plywood. Its
about 1/4 inch thick. Last time I got any , two years ago it
was about $10.00 a sheet.
dave
|
183.7 | To answer the rest of your question | CADLAC::HARDING | | Wed Apr 16 1986 17:41 | 12 |
| Particle board is made up of sawdust and glue. Its very heavy and
hard to put a nail in. For buildings its usually used for subflooring
before putting down tiles or carpets.
espnite is made up of wood shavings , like from a plainer, and glue.
Its a little lighter then plywood, easier to nail through. Usually
used as a plywood replacement on the outside walls of buildings.
I don't rate either one good if it gets wet.
dave
|
183.8 | Cut with carbide blades. | FURILO::BLESSLEY | | Thu Apr 24 1986 16:23 | 4 |
| Both materials are tough on saw blades...
-Scott
|
183.9 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | | Thu May 08 1986 14:00 | 11 |
| If you have spaces between the boards (say, greater than 1/2")
then you probably need to put something over them to give support
to the asphalt. If the boards are laid more or less tightly
together and are more or less smooth, then I'd forget it. I've
got to do something like you're talking about on my roof when
I reshingle, because it's rought-sawn slabs (bark on the edges)
with really sizable gaps. It's from the days of wooden shingles
when spaces didn't matter, but asphalt requires a bit better
surface. 1/4" plywood should do it.
Steve
|
183.10 | Vent installer? | HOMBRE::DIGRAZIA | | Mon Dec 29 1986 11:26 | 12 |
|
Getting back to the topic of this note: can anyone recommend
a roofer in the Nashua area?
I need to add ventilation to my roof, probably a ridge vent.
Also, if you're interested in installing a ridge vent on my
house in exchange for $$$, let me know -- a few hours on a
weekend or two, perhaps. (Ridge is about 18' up, two sections
of vent, about 50' long total.)
Regards, Robert.
|
183.11 | shiplap advantage? | TOPDOC::AHERN | Where was George? | Tue Oct 25 1988 08:40 | 11 |
| I'm planning to reroof an old house that was last done before plywood
was invented. I don't expect the rafters to be in the "right" place
anyway for plywood, so I plan to use 1" X 10" unplaned pine. The
local sawmill also carries shiplap and I was wondering if this would
be better on a roof. Shiplap, in case you don't know, looks like
this:
_________________
__| __|
|__________________|
|
183.12 | Shiplap roof | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Tue Oct 25 1988 09:52 | 7 |
| I recommend using plywood, even if you have to cut it. You'll
have less chance of leaking.
Shiplap is ok for the walls, but I wouldn't use it for a roof.
It won't be tight enough to keep water out.
Remember that you can get plywood in longer than 8' sheets if it
will help.
|
183.13 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Oct 25 1988 10:17 | 9 |
| Use regular boards and save a few bucks - you don't need shiplap.
And you don't need plywood. I think boards are much better for
a roof, because they give any condensation that happens to get under
the shingles a way to escape. Plywood, because of the glue, is
waterproof and will rot and/or delaminate. I've re-roofed two old
houses with roughsawn 1x10 pine from the local sawmill, and it
works fine. The shingles, not the roof deck, are supposed to keep
the water out.
|
183.14 | I'd go with the pine ... | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Tue Oct 25 1988 10:29 | 16 |
|
Plywood may be easier, but the pine will last longer.
I've been reroofing a barn/garage, and I can tell you that the tongue
and groove pine boards on the roof (which are very old), held up *much*
better than the plywood (which is much newer). I replaced most of the
plywood, and very little of the pine. Plywood delaminates if it is
exposed to too much water (even exterior grade). If you can afford it,
I think the shiplap is better.
Don't count on either plywood or the shiplap to seal out the leaks.
The shingles and tar paper (or whatever roofing material you use)
should (better!) seal out the water.
-tm
|
183.15 | The rain in Spain stays mainly on the planed? | TOPDOC::AHERN | Where was George? Where is Dan? | Mon Oct 31 1988 13:53 | 5 |
| While we're on the subject, I can't remember whether I used rough
sawn or planed one side last time. Is it worth it spending the
extra for planed to get a smoother surface under the tarpaper?
|
183.16 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Mon Oct 31 1988 15:03 | 11 |
| Planed or not...
I think it depends in part on how good the sawmill is. I wouldn't
worry about it at all as far as smoothness under the shingles is
concerned. Planing probably would be a benefit if the sawmill can't
saw boards the same thickness. In that case, getting one side planed
so the boards are all the same thickness might help. Even a good
sawmill will have some variation in roughsawn thickness. Out of
a couple thousand board feet from Parlee lumber in Littleton, I
found only a couple that were enough "off" to be a problem, and
it generally turned out the house was off enough so the extra thickness
was handy to have someplace else on the roof.
|
183.17 | Who needs a spellchecker ... | DEMING::HLQAR | | Mon Jan 16 1989 02:28 | 4 |
|
RE .6 "Luan" is the proper spelling, I believe.
Frank
|
183.18 | You do. | RUBY::J_MAHON | | Thu Mar 16 1989 14:35 | 3 |
| RE .-1
Try LAUAN.
|
183.19 | 1/2" plywood on roof? | NPSS::WADE | Network Systems Support | Tue Aug 30 1994 18:23 | 38 |
| Just another example of "make sure you ask all the right questions when
you're having a house built".
My father in-law said to make sure that they use 3/4" plywood on the
roof. Well the framer is using 1/2" and all 50-70 sheets of it are
already up laying on the ceiling joists ready to be nailed down.
I was all set to make the change this morning even if it meant that I'd
have to take the day off and lug plywood but the builder talked me out of
it this morning with the following argument:
- time is real tight with my rate lock (17-Oct) and they have to
take the time to lug the 1/2" off the roof, deliver the 3/4" and
lug it up to the roof
- I'd have to pay for the difference and the additional labor. The
framers were ready to nail down the sheathing first thing this
morning so time would be wasted.
- the roof joist are 16" OC and everyone uses 1/2" roof sheathing.
If they were 24" OC I would definitely need 3/4" but "we" make it
16" OC so you won't have any problems.
- you'd be foolish to waste your money on that, spend it on
something else in the house
- "you think someone will look at that roof in 10 years and say
"that's 1/2" sheathing up there" ?"
I think he's right but I'd feel better about the house if I had at
least 5/8" plywood on the roof. If I had asked several weeks prior I
would have not hesitated and said use at least 5/8".
So, talk to people who have been around and ask the right questions!
Bill
|
183.20 | Go with 1/2" | STRATA::CASSIDY | | Wed Aug 31 1994 04:05 | 13 |
| > My father in-law said to make sure that they use 3/4" plywood on the
> roof. Well the framer is using 1/2" and all 50-70 sheets of it are
In laws! Is your FinL a carpenter? Even if he is, I agree with
your builder. There is no justifiable reason to waste the time and
money required to replace those 1/2" sheets with 3/4". The 1/2" may
sag slightly after a few years but it wont be enough to notice. Take
the $200 (not including labor) you'll save and give your FinL a one
way ticket to where ever it will take him!
BTW (nit picking), rafters are the sloped supports for the roof.
joists are the horizontal supports for the floors and/or ceilings.
Tim
|
183.21 | Like maybe 30 year shingles... | VICKI::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Wed Aug 31 1994 10:10 | 9 |
| The 1/2" should be fine. It's more important to make sure you have
adequate ventilation. If you don't already have one, spend the extra on
getting ridge vent and make sure there are plenty of soffit vents.
Had you thought of this sooner in the process, the extra cost would
not have been that much. At this point, I'd have to agree with the
builder. Spend the money else where.
Ray
|
183.22 | | MKOTS3::GELE | ARISE,SHINE,FOR THE LIGHT HAS COME | Thu Sep 01 1994 04:18 | 4 |
| I agree with the 1/2 inch but only if the rafters are 16 inces on
center. If they are 24 inches(raters or trusses) use 3/4 and H clips.
Sylvain
|
183.23 | Next time | TARKIN::HARTWELL | Dave Hartwell | Fri Sep 16 1994 17:09 | 6 |
| Better built homes use 5/8. What a difference in the stiffness of the
roof. This means minimum sag. The 1/2 ply (really 11/32) is not what
is used to be.
/Dave
|
183.24 | You get what you pay for | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, PATHWORKS for Win. NT | Fri Sep 16 1994 17:20 | 5 |
| My roofer bid (and used) 3/8" plywood, but instead of tearing off
the whole roof, he kept the original loosely spaced planks on the
roof. The roofer who bid using 3/4" plywood wanted to do a complete
tear down to the rafters, and while it would of been nice, his
big was $3,500 more :-(
|
183.25 | | UPSAR::WALLACE | Vince Wallace | Mon Sep 19 1994 12:48 | 6 |
| I recently went to a structural engineer for some analysis on my
new house. One of the things he checked was plywood roof sheathing.
1/2 inch plywood is good for up to 40 psf with 24" o.c. rafters.
5/8 is good for up to 50 psf. The design load in Mass. is 35 psf.
So structurally 1/2" is fine. I would be concerned about bowing
with the 1/2" though (at least if using 24" o.c. rafters).
|
183.26 | | NPSS::WADE | Network Systems Support | Mon Sep 19 1994 17:37 | 1 |
| re .23 You mean 1/2 ply (really 15/32). 3/8 is really 11/32. Right?
|