T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
114.1 | | ALIEN::WEISS | | Tue Dec 03 1985 13:38 | 12 |
| I haven't used either, but everything I've read say that red is more durable
than white. But not THAT much more. I've heard advice that the red cedar is
worth it for roofing, but you're almost as well off with white for siding. I
do know that most of the price differential is in shipping costs. Red cedar is
from the west coast, and white is grown locally. I think that they weather to
slightly different colors, so if you are not staining that may be a factor.
You'll probably have an easier time finding non r&r white shingles than red,
since you're closer to the source.
Good Luck
Paul
|
114.2 | | FURILO::JOHNSON | | Wed Dec 04 1985 08:41 | 8 |
| Paul is correct relative to weathering. A big consideration in choosing
white over red is the pigments which will come to the surface in red cedar.
Red cedar cannot weather naturally and look good. The red pigment comes
to the surface in blothcy segments making the shingles look terrible. White,
on the other hand does not suffer from this pigment problem. If you are
going to cover with an opaque stain then this would not be a concern.
peter
|
114.3 | Repairing Shakes | FRSBEE::PAGLIARULO | | Tue Mar 11 1986 08:09 | 15 |
| I have shakes on my house that are in need of some repair.
Some of them are cracked others have curled a bit and still others
seem to have shifted or shrunk to the point where there are now
spaces between them. The cracks and curling are no real problem,
I can repair or replace those but the spaces are another matter.
Most of the smaller spaces I can fill with paint when I reach that
point. Is there a prefered method of handling the larger spaces?
Can you caulk in between the shakes? Under the shakes there is
a felt type of board - for insulation I imagine. If this material
is not exposed by the spaces should I even worry about them? We're
talking spaces of anywhere up to 1/4".
Thanks for the help.
George
|
114.4 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | | Tue Mar 11 1986 10:47 | 9 |
| Spaces between shakes are normal. Your spaces of up to 1/4" are
probably fine. The shakes should be applied so that none of the
cracks of one layer line up with the cracks of the layer above or
below it; if that is done, the overlap will be sufficient that
everything will be weathertight. If you can see through cracks
down to the felt underlayment then you do have a problem, but
otherwise almost certainly no.
Steve
|
114.5 | More info needed | PAUPER::GETTYS | Bob Gettys N1BRM | Tue Mar 11 1986 20:37 | 6 |
| Do you by any chance live in a slab Ranch (possibly
built by Campanelli)?????? If you do, I'll have more to say
later!
/s/ Bob
|
114.6 | | FRSBEE::PAGLIARULO | | Wed Mar 12 1986 08:03 | 2 |
| re .2
Nope. It's a cape built by god knows who.
|
114.7 | New addition needs shingling | DSSDEV::BIBEAULT | Mike Bibeault | Thu Mar 13 1986 08:00 | 5 |
| Speaking of shakes...
Anyone know where I can get new shakes in the Lowell/Nashua area?
-mike
|
114.8 | <Webber's, Grossman's, ...> | NOVA::GIOIELLI | | Fri Mar 14 1986 09:03 | 10 |
| If you're interested in red cedar (I wouldn't recommend white cedar),
you can find them at practically any building supply place. I bought
a "square" of Resquared/Rebutted (#2, I think ?) red cedar shakes
at Webber in No Chelmsford for about $50 on sale last Fall. But,
I believe Grossmans, Friends (in Lowell) and Channel all carry them
and occassionally run sales. Check their circulars in the local
papers. Get the best shakes you can. I've used both White and Red,
and there's a world of difference working with the better shakes.
- mike g.
|
114.9 | Shake Update | FRSBEE::PAGLIARULO | | Mon Mar 17 1986 12:17 | 17 |
| Well, this weekend I checked out the house again and this is the
situation. The spaces are smaller than I thought with the largest
being only an 1/8th inch and most smaller than that. Underneath
the shakes there is a fiber board that runs under each course of
shakes. Understand that the house isn't sheathed in this stuff
and the shakes nailed to the sheathing but instead it seems that
a course of fiberboard was nailed to the sheathing and then a course
of shakes over that, than another course of fiber and shakes etc.
over the entire house. The spaces between the shakes exposes a
small area of this fiberboard to the weather. Is this a problem?
Does anyone know what this material is? Is it common with shakes
as oppossed to shingles? I'm not really worried about it since
it's been there 17 yrs. and seems to be in fairly good shape (dry,
not crumbling). I am curious though since I haven't seen it before.
Again, thanks for the help
|
114.10 | shakes on fiber | SYNAPS::ALLEN | Roger | Mon Mar 17 1986 17:28 | 17 |
| My house has the same outer skins, shakes over fiberboard. I needed to
repair some shakes when I was repainting, but I couldn't fine anyone who
would supply me with a small quantity of shakes that matched, only
available in quantities large enough to do half a wall or so.
What I ended up doing was borrowing a few good shakes from a corner at
the back of the house, where it's quite shaded and there are some rose
bushes there anyway. These I used to replace the damaged ones in various
places around the visible sides of the house. I replaced the borrowed
ones with cedar shingles that were the same size, but slightly different
texture. After the paint job, it's hard to notice a difference from a
few feet away. If I find some shakes that match, it's fairly easy now to
put them up in place of the cedar ones. Then the only problem will be
matching paint; I have some left but I'm sure the house has changed
color already.
- Roger
|
114.11 | Grossmans and Quality??? | 11278::GINGER | | Mon Mar 17 1986 20:01 | 16 |
| Re: .5
The suggestion to buy the best available shakes is a good one, but
to then include the name Grossman's in the same sentence leaves
me dumbfounded. I have never seen a wood item at Grossman's that
I would use as kindling, let alone build a house from (I have built
two major additions for friends that bought from Grossmans). They
are fine for manufactured products with brand names but their lumber
is awfull. I asked a Grossmans salesrep once what the label 'PAD'
meant on their framing lumber- he replied Partially Air Dried, that
means it was cut and milled green and got whatever drying occured
on the truck enroute from the mill to Grossmans. Dont let the stuff
come in contact with the ground, it's likely to sprout roots!
Just my opinion of course,
Ron Ginger
|
114.12 | Let's Make A Deal | FRSBEE::PAGLIARULO | | Tue Mar 18 1986 11:11 | 10 |
| re .7
Roger,
I'm going to need some shakes when I do the house this spring
but I don't think I'm going ot need an entire bundle (I think the
trade term is "square"?). If you still need shakes would you be
interested in splitting a bundle?
George
|
114.13 | can't think of a good title | ELGAR::LEWIS | | Tue Mar 18 1986 12:54 | 18 |
|
I've heard of a place in Chelmsford that has (or had) red cedar butted
and resquared for about $42/square.
Also about buying part of a square...they're usually four bundles
per square and you can buy just a bundle. Not meaning to insult,
but that means you can buy just enough for about 25 square feet.
However, some are sold by the box, which usually covers about 50
square feet.
- Rich, who has gone through about 4 squares - 3 to go,
and who sure as hell wouldn't want to do it
for a living.
P.S. The bundle per square they quote depends on the exposure.
They usually tell you what number they use. Usually they
use 6 inches, but I've heard 7 from some suppliers.
|
114.14 | deal on shakes | SYNAPS::ALLEN | Roger | Tue Mar 18 1986 20:54 | 22 |
| RE: .9
George, if we have the same kind of shakes, I'll take a look at a deal.
It depends a lot on how many you will need, and what price we would have
to pay for a square. I only need a few, but could take a quarter of a
square (one bundle if that's how they package them) and have a goodly few
spares. When I was hunting around, there seemed to be few suppliers who
could get me the kind I needed, and the only one that was certain that
they could was on the west side of Manchester, maybe as far west as to
actually be in Goffstown.
At the time, I was kind of rushed, as there was only a small window of
time when my brother-in-law was in the area. (He's a pro house painter,
and had offered to do most of the painting if we shared the preparation.)
There may be other suppliers that I didn't get to try who can supply
smaller quantities.
Where are you located? We'll need to figure out how to do the
comparison. I live in Merrimack, NH, work in Spitbrook Rd, and visit
Littleton quite a lot.
- Roger
|
114.15 | OOPS! | ELGAR::LEWIS | | Wed Mar 19 1986 08:18 | 5 |
|
Oops! That price I gave in .10 was for a box (not a square), which
covers about a half square. Sorry 'bout that!
- Rich
|
114.16 | extra shakes | PAXVAX::NAYLOR | Mark E. Naylor | Wed Mar 26 1986 23:16 | 14 |
|
RE: .11
Roger,
I bought a square last year to cover up some windows I removed. I have one
bundle left. If they match yours, I'll sell them cheap. I work in the Mill
but got to ZK about once a month. If your interested, let me know and I'll
bring a sample.
Mark
|
114.17 | what's a shake? | STOWMA::ARDINI | From the third plane. | Thu Mar 27 1986 08:28 | 2 |
| What is a shake? Is it some sort of shingle? wood or asbestos?
Jorge'
|
114.18 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | | Thu Mar 27 1986 13:11 | 5 |
| A shake is a split, not sawn, wooden shingle. If you're in the
mill, look above the vending machines outside the cafeteria on 5-4.
That fake roof thing is covered with shakes.
Steve
|
114.19 | shakes or fake-shakes | SYZYGY::ALLEN | Roger | Thu Mar 27 1986 17:24 | 9 |
| Some shakes are fake; fake shakes. Someone just told me that mine may be
some asbestos composition, but I'm not sure. The grain on the surface is
certainly fake, much too uniform. I think it was milled on after some
other manufacturing process. When I was doing repairs, the broken ones
seemed to me to have some real grain within them.
So you folks that have offered to do some kind of sharing, if you have
real wooden shakes with genuine woodgrain, they aren't the same as mine.
You may be able to do some kind of sharing with each other though.
|
114.28 | Sandblast or buy new shingles? | ASTRO::OBRIEN | | Thu Apr 03 1986 09:01 | 16 |
| I am planing an addition to my house and I will be using cedar
shingles on the outside. I want to stain the shingles on the
addition and also stain the rest of the house at the same time.
My problem is this, the rest of the house is shingled but the
previous owner painted them a number of times. I have heard that
I can sand blast the shingles to remove the paint but this sounds
like a very big job. The other option is removing all the old
shingles and replacing them. Has anyone ever done anything like
this? Does anyone know the cost and time differance between these
two options? I will have to rent the sand blaster and buy the sand.
I also can picture having the equivalent of a beach around my house
after I'm done.
Any response is helpful
Mike
|
114.29 | Get it blasted | BEING::WEISS | Forty-Two | Thu Apr 03 1986 09:44 | 9 |
| I would guess offhand that it might be cheaper to have someone come in and do
the sandblasting for you than it would be to buy new shingles. Cedar shingles
aren't cheap! Even if it is slightly more expensive, think of the time it would
take (and the mess it would create) to rip off all the old ones, to say nothing
of the time to reshingle. Sandblasting might also fall into the category of
things that are worth having done by someone else. I'd be interested in hearing
from anyone who has done it themselves.
Paul
|
114.30 | Sandblasting is overkill | ELUDOM::CLARK | Ward Clark | Thu Apr 03 1986 23:32 | 8 |
| If you actually try sandblasting your cedar shingles, you will wind
up reshingling the house. Sandblasting is for stone and metal.
When used on wood, it will almost instanteously vaporize the wood.
Blasting paint off wood can be done using a less abrasive material,
like sawdust.
-- Ward
|
114.31 | Keep vaporisation for the klingons... | SNO78C::MCLAREN | Andrew McLaren | Fri Apr 04 1986 00:02 | 5 |
| Saw an old cedar panelled ceiling a couple of weeks back that had
100 odd years of paint sandblasted off. Definitely gives it a coarse
finish, but looked good.
Andrew M.
|
114.32 | check with the town first! | 11740::JACKSON | You're livin in your own private idaho | Fri Apr 04 1986 16:52 | 8 |
| be careful about blasting. Most towns now have laws about blasting
paint off buildings, especially ones that have lead based paint
on them.
You may find that it can't be done, or the hassle is so high that
the re-shingle is the better bet
-bill
|
114.33 | Reverse angle | 11740::KENT | Peter | Sun Apr 06 1986 10:53 | 1 |
| Can you flip the shingles over without doing too much damage?
|
114.34 | Don't flip 'em! | GROFE::LEWIS | | Mon Apr 07 1986 14:09 | 25 |
| re .5:
Hmmm...let me think of a good way to paraphrase this... The correct
way to apply shingles is so that they are flexed to oppose their natural
curvature.
If a shingle tends to curve more in the vertical direction,
you should put the conCAVE side against the wall (previous course)
so that the natural curvature forces the bottom edge to fit tightly
against the previous course, rather than bending outward. If a shingle
tends to curve more in the horizontal direction, you want to put the
conVEX side against the wall and this will also hold the bottom
edge against the previous course.
So, assuming your shingles were applied correctly to begin with,
you shouldn't flip them over.
BTW, there is an occasional wide shingle that fits in a third
category - the curve reverses direction somewhere in the middle
or something else weird. This kind is a good candidate either for
the trash or to be split in half before using.
Hope this helps!
- Rich
|
114.35 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | | Thu May 08 1986 13:03 | 17 |
| For a look at sandblasted wood, come to the mill in Maynard.
Sandblasting tends to emphasize the grain - a lot - and with
cedar shingles it would take a delicate touch to avoid eating
up the shingles, but I'd say it is certainly feasible. I would
also opt for paying somebody to do it. Sandblasting is a DIRTY
job!!! I've got a little Sears sandblaster, and even with that
the mess is unbelievable. I wear a full-length poncho with hood,
a face mask, face shield, gloves, high boots with jeans pulled
down over them, and sand and dirt still get inside my clothes!
I would guess by the time you rented equipmend big enough to do
the job in a reasonable amount of time, and went thorough the hassle
of actually doing the work, paying somebody to do the work would
look pretty good.
Steve
Steve
|
114.41 | Spruce siding - Good or Bad ? | DAFFY::WHITNEY | Bill Whitney | Tue May 13 1986 14:48 | 17 |
|
I'm looking for some information on the reliability of spuce siding. It will
be used on a cottage on Lake Champlain in VT and finished with at least 2
coats of a good quality oil based semi-transparent stain ( on the roughsawn
side). The builder says it's a good inexpensive alternative to the more
expensive cedar (or fir) siding and that he has had good luck with it. Some
people I've talked to say it's a mistake, the spuce will rot, and that there
is no replacement for cedar as a wood siding material. I'd like to hear from
anyone that can speak from experience. I'd prefer not to have to spend the
extra $$ if at all possible.
Thanks, Bill
|
114.42 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | | Tue May 13 1986 15:22 | 6 |
| My guess is, it will do fine. Especially if you seal the back of
the siding before you put it on, either with stain or Cuprinol or
something similar. If you keep it stained it will almost certainly
last a lot longer than you are likely to care about it.
Steve
|
114.43 | spruce siding | KRYPTN::FINGERHUT | | Wed May 14 1986 08:52 | 4 |
| Some clapboards will split but not so many that you won't
save money in the long-run. It will also help to dip the
clapboards in the cuprinol rather than using a brush.
|
114.44 | Rot from the inside... | JOET::JOET | Just like a penguin in bondage... | Wed May 14 1986 10:47 | 6 |
| re: dipping it
Isn't there something about not sealing every surface of a piece of
wood so water has somewhere to get out?
-joet
|
114.45 | Cuprinol doesn't seal | LATOUR::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Wed May 14 1986 10:55 | 6 |
| > Isn't there something about not sealing every surface of a piece of
> wood so water has somewhere to get out?
Cuprinol and other preservatives or stains don't seal the wood,
so it can still breathe. What you don't want to do is *paint* both
sides.
|
114.20 | How do you stain shakes? | PYRITE::HOFFMAN | Buren Hoffman - Lab Data Products | Thu May 15 1986 14:45 | 8 |
| I have an old house that has been covered with shakes. They have
weathered somewhat ungracefully. So now I have decided I would like to
stain them (opaque). However, just looking at the job, it appears to me
that it will be one bear of a job to get the stain into all those
cracks and rough surfaces. Is there a secret to this? Must I use a
sprayer? Any help/suggestions appreciated.
... Buren
|
114.21 | Forget Spray, get a Pad! | GIGI::GINGER | | Fri May 16 1986 14:59 | 7 |
| We, actually my wife mostly, repainted our shingled house last year.
She went to the hardware store for a brush and the salesperson sold
her a paint pad. IT WAS UNBELIEVABLE! she painted a 2 story colonial
in only 2 or 3 days with the thing. It would cover 2 or 3 sqft from
one dipping, never drip and eaisly filled in all the cracks and
even under the edge. Forget spraying, buy a pad- they are only $4!
|
114.22 | Consider a sprayer | SPAGS::STEBULIS | | Mon May 19 1986 09:58 | 12 |
| I would consider using a sprayer. I did my cape with a dormer in
a weekend with one. I used it with the attached reservior rather
than the long tube into the can (wouldn't suck up the stain nicely).
I would spray a large area then go back with a brush and touch up
the rough areas and some of the cracks. The reservoir held enough
that I didn't feel like I was wasting alot of time refilling and
it allowed me to do the touch up before the stain started drying
too much. I had gotten the sprayer as a gift so I didn't have the
initial outlay for it ($80-$100).
Steve
|
114.46 | ? Staining Clapboards, Pre-installation? | HBO::PENNEY | Common Cents... | Wed Jul 02 1986 08:25 | 26 |
| Anyone out there got any good suggestions for building a vat to dip red
cedar clapboards in for staining before installation? The claboards
are 6 " x random length, up to 12' long.I have a number of ideas, the
best of which seems the 2 x ?. Here's the alternatives, with +/-.
1. Don't stain the siding till it's on the house. ( +:
Eliminates the vat issue. -: Only does one side, doesn't
penetrate as well, messy, time)
2. Stain in the normal manner BEFORE installation. ( +: Gets
both sides, conventional techniques -: Time consuming, sloppy,
doesn't penetrate as well as dipping, stacking )
3. Dip. ( +: Best penetration, easy, fast -: Building the vat,
stacking) For a vat (the siding is up to 12 ' long x 6"), I've
considered: Plastic gutter section (probably too shallow??);
building out of 2 x ? (may have to line it with a non-permeable
coating or other barrier of some sort, else the stain will soak
into the wood of the vat)
Help!
Thanks.
Bill
|
114.47 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | | Wed Jul 02 1986 08:52 | 5 |
| How about some 1x6 or 1x8 stock, lined with fiberglass from your
friendly local auto fixit store? (Why are you considering 2x stock?
How strong does this thing need to be, after all?)
Steve
|
114.48 | Down the tube | ASTRO::OBRIEN | | Wed Jul 02 1986 09:22 | 9 |
| Why not use an 8 inch dia. or larger dia. PVC pipe. Get what
ever length you need, cap the bottom and elevate the open end.
Fill the tube with stain and slide in the clap board. This may
be less messy than a trough and when not using it you can cap
the open end and it's ready to use another day. I know an antique
dealer who dissasembles beds an strips them this way.
Mike O'Brien
|
114.49 | dipping clapboards | AVANTI::FINGERHUT | | Wed Jul 02 1986 09:59 | 15 |
| I used one made of 1x10 shiplap. The frame was made of 2x4's
(Just enough to hold the shiplap together. So it was just 3
14' pieces of shiplap. A sheet of 3 foot wide plastic (the
kind that comes in a roll, usually to be used as a vapor
barrier), lined the inside. After they were dipped, I layed
them on the ground using 2x4's to hold them off the ground.
Remember that the siding is probably going to all have to
be cut (or at least squared) before it is put up. You might
end up with thin vertical (unstained) lines where all the
pieces meet.
Next time, I would only prestain enough to be used at the peaks,
since I don't like high ladders too much.
|
114.50 | Metal tray | MAX::KEVIN | | Wed Jul 02 1986 10:59 | 6 |
| I picked up a section of a demolished metal building at Duane's
Wrecking in Qunicy. It is U-shaped, ~14" wide, ~5" high and ~12'
long. It's made out of galzanized metal. It has open ends that you'd
have to plug. I originally bought it to use as a stripping tank but
never got around to using it.
|
114.51 | Thanks | ESPN::PENNEY | Common Cents... | Thu Jul 03 1986 08:18 | 5 |
| Thanks for all your help. I particularly appreciate (.2), that's
slick!
Bill
|
114.52 | I like .2 | CYGNUS::VHAMBURGER | Vic Hamburger IND-2/B4 262-8261 | Mon Jul 07 1986 13:39 | 13 |
| re:2
That does sound slick...(ask me, I have reclapboarded my house over
the past few years, one side at a time, then stained it.) Watch
out for solids in your stains, they will settle in any tank affair
you build. The cappable tube idea sounds like less evaporation and
ifyou can cap it tightly, you could even "shake your stain" every
so often to be sure of keeping your solids in suspension.
BTW: don't skimp on cheap stain, it isn't worth it. A few dollars
more per gallon of top quality stain will make the job last longer
and look better. All good brands go on sale at some time in the
year so watch for the ads.
|
114.53 | As long as we're on the subject... | HBO::PENNEY | Common Cents... | Tue Jul 08 1986 13:41 | 15 |
| Any suggestions on stains? We want a weathering stain, which is
different from solid, semi-solids, or transparents, as I understand it.
Turns cedar that nice natural weathered gray look in a relatively short
time, if I understand correctly. We've been thinking about Cabot's,
Cuprinol, in particular. Don't know if one manufacturer is better than
another.
What about staging, scaffolding? I'm building some out of plywood, & 2
xs. If I had to do it over, I wouldn't go that route. I'll have the
best home grown staging in Hillsboro County when I get done, but adding
the labor to the lumber cost leads me to believe the project isn't
residing the house, it's building the staging to reside the house ;-(.
Bill
|
114.36 | Use dry ice, followed by stain | WHERE::GEE | | Wed Jul 09 1986 11:45 | 20 |
| There is a blasting method that was devised for cleaning anchor
chains for the US Navy. It uses a machine that manufactures
Dry Ice Pellets and uses them as the abrasive material, rather
than sand. The pellets remove the paint by impact and temperature
change on the paint, while also polishing the surface of the
wood as the pellets disolve. There is no sand debris, as an added
benefit.
There is a firm locally that offers blasting with this method, but
I did not try them since I'd already finished 1/4 of the house with
a heat gun and perspiration. But, if I had it to do over the blasters
would get the contract.
I'm working on only the clapboard of the first story, the remaining
three stories are shingle and are 70 years + old. They were painted
by the previous owner and have subsequently curled due to the paint
preventing water absorbtion, while the humidity and water absorbed
into the inner facing.
Sorry not to remember the dry ice blasting contractor's name, but
found him through the yellow pages after a number of calls for
price quotes, availability, etc.
|
114.37 | COSTS OF SANDBLASTING? | JAWS::AUSTIN | Tom Austin @UPO - Channels Marketing | Wed Jul 09 1986 14:12 | 9 |
| Any estimates on the cost of getting someone in to sandblast (or
dry ice blast or whatever)? How much did it cost for how many square
feet?
I'm looking at my cedar clapboard which has been stained "Mission
Brown", which is a dark, dark brown. I long for a white or, to use
an easy stain, light sand colored house. And I suspect that using
one of the solid color stains of the right tone, it will take umpteen
million coats of stain to hide the dark brown.
|
114.38 | | NOVA::BEYER | Don't Leave Perth Without It | Wed Jul 09 1986 15:47 | 3 |
| Can you sandblast stain? I shouldn't think it would work.
HRB
|
114.54 | -< STAGING>- | JUNIOR::CAMBERLAIN | | Tue Jul 22 1986 15:44 | 7 |
| When it comes to staging for siding do as the pros do! Buy four
sets of "pump up" and some staging planks. Big money yes, but it
is safe and you should be able to sell it for 2/3 of what you payed
for it when your done!
-Mike_
|
114.55 | staging questions... | JOET::JOET | Thela hun ginjeet | Tue Jul 22 1986 17:22 | 6 |
| re: .8
What is "pump up", where would you buy it (them), and how much would
it cost to get about 25' up in the air?
-joet
|
114.56 | Pump Jacks | BRAHMS::LEWIS | Please...no wagering. | Tue Jul 22 1986 19:29 | 16 |
|
I've heard them called pump jacks. They're brackets that you put on a
roughly 4x4 pole and they hold your staging planks. They have a lever
that makes the bracket climb up about 4-6" for each pump, so that you
gradually work your way up...great for wall shingling! Farnsworth in
Shirley has them for about $45 each (not too long ago), including the
bracket for the top of your pole, which you nail near the top of your
wall. For 25 feet, you probably want to use 2x4s face-nailed together
to make almost 4x4's, since it's tough to get a 4x4 to stay straight
at that length. Some cross-bracing wouldn't hurt, too. And have a
ladder handy to climb down on, since you can't lower them with any
weight on them (this is true of the ones I borrowed, anyway).
Enjoy!
- Rich
|
114.57 | More pump jacks | PAXVAX::NAYLOR | Mark E. Naylor | Tue Jul 22 1986 21:01 | 25 |
| I also know them as "pump-jacks". I bought a set two years ago for $110
from Coast Ladder (in Lynn MA, I think). They work great. I needed
to get 20' up, so I made 24' 4x4's by screwing 2x4's together as
mentioned in .9. Since I only weigh 160, the guy said there was no
need to buy "real" oak staging planks. But I did buy rough sawn 2x12
fir - do NOT purchase 2x12 pine. A 16' fir plank spanning about 12' only
gives an inch or two when I walk on it.
The ones I bought move up just about 3" with each pump. I too used
a ladder to get up to the staging. However, to get the pump jack
down when finished, you can bring them back down. You release the
crank, put your one foot on the lower lever, put your other foot
on the plank (keep weight on it), and turn the crank. Each turn
lowers you about 3".
Good luck,
Mark
P.S. I think it is also advisable to spend another $35 for guardrail
brackets. They fit on top of the pumpjack and permit you to
add one or two 2x4 or 2x6 guard rails. Since they are attatched
to the pumpjack, the rails move up as you raise the pumpjack.
|
114.58 | Spruce is IT! | JACOB::GINGER | | Wed Jul 23 1986 00:14 | 8 |
| I think the planks to use are SPRUCE. They are sold specifically
as staging planks, are usually full dimension 2x12 and OHSA sets
standards for grain runout, knots etc. I cant imagine who could
lift an oak plank and fir isnt much lighter.
I use lots of staging planks- but I make Masts, booms, gaffs, and
oars out of them for boats! I last paid about $.60 per bdft for
staging plank, the last 'boat spruce' I saw from Condon was $4.50!
|
114.59 | | BEING::WEISS | Forty-Two | Wed Jul 23 1986 08:38 | 5 |
| Actually, I think most pump jacks are _designed_ to be used with two 2x4s
nailed or screwed together. At least some of them are, I don't think mine
would fit a 4x4. Check before you go and buy your posts.
Paul
|
114.60 | Another staging idea | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | | Wed Jul 23 1986 09:22 | 28 |
| In times past I've rented steel scaffolding. Great stuff, but $$$.
Doing it again, I probably wouldn't unless I really needed an area
4' or so wide to walk on. The pump jacks are probably the best
way to go, all things considered, if you have to get more than a
few feet into the air.
If you just need to go up, say, 6' or so, some gadgets an uncle
of mine made are real handy. He didn't invent them, but has made
several pair of various heights. Basically it's an A-frame with
an arm sticking out at the top (valiant attempt at line-art here:)
front view side view
|| ===============
//\\ A \\
// \\ \\
// \\ \\
//======\\ B\\
// \\ \\
// \\ \\
Angles of legs should be 3:12 ratio on a framing square.
There should be diagonal braces going from point A to point B on
each leg, but I can't figure out how to draw them....
Point A leans up against the house wall, and you put staging planks
across the top. When you want to move, just pick up the frames
and carry them to where you want to be.
Steve
|
114.61 | Used pump jacks bought here... | EUREKA::REG_B | | Wed Jul 23 1986 10:51 | 9 |
|
I will probably be in the market for a set of pump jacks myself
sometime soon. If anyone has a set that "need a new home", or is going
to be getting a set for a one time project, and then disposing of them
please send me mail. I'll take the planks too if they are in good
shape.
Reg
|
114.62 | don't forget the inexpensive route | OLORIN::SEGER | | Wed Jul 23 1986 18:02 | 20 |
| Us modern people have it real easy. When I shingled my house, my father-in-law
built me some staging for a LOT less. We simply bought some long 2X4's, stood
them up and c-clamped them to the house where possible and otherwise nailed
them. Then we simply took boards about 4 or 5 inches wide and cross nailed
them to the 2x4's. Across these we placed a section of an extension ladder
to make the surface for standing on. On top of that plywood or pine keeps you
from falling through. Finally, another 2X4 clamped horizontally about 3 feet
above the plank forms the railing.
When you're done, you simply cut up the 2X4's for your next project.
Sounds to me like I'd get the clamps too, but would stick with the ladder for
the plank.
Whatever you do, be SURE to put up a railing! I tried working without one and
all it took was one brush with death at 20 feet to convince me I needed one.
By the way, my method requires at least 2 extension ladders because you need
at least one just to get on and off the staging and a second for the staging
itself. As I said before, it's crude but CHEAP! As for safety, like a rock!
|
114.63 | Safety Note! | JACOB::GINGER | | Wed Jul 23 1986 18:31 | 7 |
| .16 suggests using a ladder as a staging plank. Every ladder Ive
ever seen had a safety legend on it about it NOT being suitable
for a plank. Ladders are designed to carry most load in compression,
this kind of use puts them in BIG tension load. I'd stick with
'official' staging planks.
Ron
|
114.64 | OSHA is sometimes paranoid (for your own good)! | LYMPH::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Fri Jul 25 1986 10:02 | 21 |
| You certainly raise a valid point and I had to think about it for awhile.
If you knew my father in law, you'd KNOW he never takes chances. The way I
figure it is that OSHA is very careful in watching labelling practices. If
someone were to do as I just said and hauled up a coule hundred pound load of
shingles or even put a second person on there, they're be in for a long drop.
On the other hand, if you look at the strength of 2X4's (I use a wooden ladder,
NEVER aluminum!) what is essentially what the ladder is made of (though I'll bet
the quality of the wood is much better than 2X4's). Look at kids wooden swing
sets. Some of them span more than 10 feet and when fully loaded with kids (or
adults!) can put a much stonger load on that the staging with me on it.
Furthermore, the wood that the wooden swings are made of (southern yellow pine)
is not as strong as a good spruce 2X4 (I know because when I tested a swing set
I built out of the southern yellow pine, I was able to snap some of the timbers
but just sitting on them (which is a possible topic for another note)).
Anyhow, re: .-1, even using staging planks can be very dangerous if you don't
use your head. Like I said before, I still plan to use ladders for staging, BUT
will never load them with more than me...
-mark
|
114.81 | Gap between foundation and siding | CSC32::WATERS | | Thu Aug 21 1986 14:41 | 20 |
| HI,
This notes file is GREAT. There is alot of information that
has come in real handy, as my life of a home owner continues.
But, I do have another type problem I need some suggestions on.
There is a Gap between the foundation and the siding on my house.
This Gap is about 1"+, and you can see the insulation if you look
up it. The siding on the house is a pressed wood type stuff and
the foundation of course in cement. It goes all the way around
the house, except where the patio and brick facing are at.
The house is about 2 1/2 years old and this gap is the way the
house was built, not because of structure damage or the like...
Becuase of winter time heat loss and mice and other creepy crawlers
getting up there, I need to close it off. I don't believe a weather
stripping type material will work, the mice will eat that too.
Any suggestions on how I should close this gap ?
Thanks for the help in the past and the present!! Mark
|
114.82 | Spray Foam (for mine at least). | THORBY::MARRA | All I have to be is what You made me. | Thu Aug 21 1986 15:37 | 14 |
|
I take it that you can't get to the other side of the wall?
I have the same problem, only my basement (of a split) is unfinished,
and the gap is only � inch at most. I am (someday soon) going to
use the foam that comes in a spray can to fill the gap.
Your gap sounds much larger that mine. I think you may have to
nail some wood strips into the area first, then fill the gap with
the spray foam afterwards.
anybody else got any ideas?
.dave.
|
114.83 | Watch out for spray foam! | NACMTW::TOBIN | | Fri Aug 22 1986 09:00 | 6 |
| I tried using that spray foam to fill a gap around the cellar door.
Watch out! It isn't as easy to use as it sounds. Some of the stuff
I used went through the crack to the outside. It was impossible
to remove and quickly turned a yellow-brown color. Only after about
6 months did it harden enough for me to scrape off - and even then
it was a hell of job to get it off.
|
114.84 | Access? | GENRAL::HUNTER | from SUNNY Colorado, Wayne | Fri Aug 22 1986 17:36 | 4 |
| Can you get to the inside of the foundation and wall? If so, you
can face it and grout it full using some anchors and things that
would be much more permanent.
|
114.85 | no inside access at all | CSC32::WATERS | | Tue Aug 26 1986 15:54 | 22 |
| I do not have access to this gap from the inside, only the outside.
This is what it looks like now:
installation
|
V
inside drywall --> | |
concret floor_______|_ | <-- exterier siding
^ | | <-- concret foundation
| |_____ <-- earth, ground, mother nature etc...
The house is a two story house, without a basment or any type of
under ground access. There is about 4" between the ground and the
siding.
I been thinking about placing 2"x2" and painting the showing edges.
But the 2x2 will come out past the outside siding. 2x are too big and
1x are two small, 1x would leave about 1/2 (+-) inch to caulk.
The installation foam is a good idea, but the mice will eat through
that given time. Need somthing a little more solid.
|
114.87 | Repainting Insulite siding | MONET::FERWERDA | Loptson | Tue Aug 26 1986 16:05 | 57 |
| We are in dire need of knowledgeable advice. So far we have been
given contradictory advice and are looking for further information
which can be backed up by experience.
To set the stage:
We live in a home that is three years old. The builder sided the
home with something called Insulite made by Masonite. Insulite is
a composite made of compressed sawdust or something which comes
resembling wood on the top with the primer already applied. The
builder put on a skimpy coat of latex paint over the existing primer.
The paint has peeled badly and where it has peeled in most cases
(on the southern side of the house), it has left us unsure as to
whether any primer still remains on the siding or not. The siding
is not very amenable to scraping (ie it is very easy to leave all
sorts of fibers hanging out if you scrape too deeply). In a few
places, however, we have gotten through to the underlying mystery
material of which the siding is made. This leaves us with 75% latex
paint in okay shape, 24% latex off but uncertain as to whether primer
remains or we're dealing with the top layer of siding, and a final
1% where we have definitely gotten through to siding material.
The dilemma:
Do we cover it all with a thick coat of latex house paint?
Do we cover it with a coat of oil-based primer then the latex house
paint?
Do we use the oil-based primer to just touch up the areas where
we are definitely through to the siding mystery material?
The contradictory advice has tended to follow these lines:
- Cover with oil-based primer over the entire house.
- Don't try to cover oil-based primer with latex paint.
- Don't put oil-based primer (this advice from the can), over
any latex paint at all.
- Cover entire house with two coats of latex and forget the
primer.
As you can see, we are very confused. I'm willing to listen to any
reasonable suggestions but due to the budget crunch the suggestions
must be ones which I can carry out myself before the end of the
decade (ie I don't want to put in 2080 hours painting the house
with an exotic kiwi-juice based paint).
As the house is scraped and virtually caulked and the winter is
nearly upon us, we had hoped to attack the problem this weekend.
Consequently, advice is welcome before then, or even after then
as we don't plan to start painting until we are reasonably sure
that our plans have some chance of working.
Thank you in advance,
Paul
|
114.86 | try styrafoam board | USFHSL::PIEPER | | Tue Aug 26 1986 17:12 | 19 |
| Why not insulate the outside of your concrete foundation with
styrafoam? On my house, my siding was out one inch past my
slab edge because I used one inch tuff-r for sheathing before
putting on the siding. To correct this, I insulated the edges of
the slab with one inch styrafoam and went about 3-4 inches below
the ground level. The styrafoam can tuck up under the siding very
neatly, and since it comes in various thicknesses, I'm sure you
can find a thickness close to the gap that you have. Since the
styrafoam is not very strong (compared to the concrete that used
to be exposed), and since light deteriorates the styrafoam, you
have to put a protective covering over the new exposed edge... But
don't worry...Styrafoam (or whoever makes it) has a coating material
that comes in 5 gallon buckets and does the job quite nicely. You
just mix it up, trowel it on,(I used a putty knife) and then brush
it so that it looks textured.(Brush is provided in 5 gallon kit)
By the way...you just glue the styrafoam board to the concrete
foundation with a good quality construction glue.
After you're finished, you can't tell the difference from the regular
concrete foundation that you started with.
|
114.88 | Oil and Water don't *always* mix | ERLANG::BD | Brian D. Handspicker | Tue Aug 26 1986 18:01 | 21 |
| Akalyd paint is happily compatible with both latex and oil.
If you feel it is necessary to prime (or double coat) the house,
and you want to use oil for your final coat you should use
an alkalyd primer. Combining oil and latex often leads to peeling,
etc.
Unfortunately, alkalyd paint is slightly more expensive than good
quality oil paint. And, go with a good quality paint. Paint
seems to be one of those commodities where "you get what you
pay for".
Don't try to "put on a thick coat" of either latex or oil.
At best you'll end up with a poor paint job (runs, drips, etc.).
At worst you will have problems due to poor "drying".
Fianally, try to find out why the original paint peeled.
Was it simply poor painting? Poor paint quality? Mixing
oil and latex improperly? Or, as has been discussed so often here,
moisture problems?
bd
|
114.89 | Can we play "20 Questions"? | MONET::FERWERDA | Loptson | Tue Aug 26 1986 18:20 | 18 |
| < Note 338.1 by ERLANG::BD "Brian D. Handspicker" >
-< Oil and Water don't *always* mix >-
Brian,
Are you suggesting using the akalyd paint as both primer and
final coat over the existing latex/primer combination and over the
spots where we're down to the siding mystery material?
Do you have any handy-dandy list of questions that I can use
to determine what caused the paint to peel? The peeling seems to
be uniform along the bottom edge of most of the siding. It also
seems to occur in the middle of the lower half of the south-east
side of the house and the middle of the lower half of the south-west
side. North-west and north-east have no peeling but some mildew.
Paul
|
114.90 | | PVAX::DEINNOCENTIS | | Wed Aug 27 1986 17:49 | 10 |
| I owned an insulite clad home for 8 years. It was painted with
Sherwin Williams and never had a paint failure. The north side
was shakes though. Anyhow my only advice is not to paint with
a brush. Either use a pad or spray. Every stroke will show up
with a brush.
Find out why the original paint failed before you invest time and
money in a remedy. Talk to a paint supply person.
good luck
|
114.91 | SOME INFO, SOME SUGGESTIONS | DSTAR::SMICK | Van Smick | Thu Aug 28 1986 10:20 | 50 |
| Paul,
I have a Insulite sided house and have painted sections of Insulite
as a result of adding a deck and wooden chase. There is nothing particularly
unique about the Insulite. The only real difference between Insulite
and Masonite is that the former is primed with a paint which
supposedly seals the wood and adds to the insulation of your walls.
I don't believe the insulation claims but the primer does ease the
painting. If it were not primed, your contractor could not have
gotten away with only one coat of house paint. You can easily tell
when you have scraped below the primer, Insulite is brown under the
gray primer.
I spent a number of summers painting houses for a "old pro" and
his approach was to prime any bare wood (or masonite) with a latex
primer (Muralo makes a good one) and then put on two coats of a
good quality latex house paint. He only used oil based paints where
he was covering areas previously painted with oil paints.
His paint choices were:
Californian (good quality at a good price)
Benjamin Moore (better quality at a inflated price).
I agree with the other replies that you need to find out what caused
the peeling. I know that some of the contractors thin the paint to save
money and make it easier to apply. I wonder if your pealing could be
due to too thin a coat of paint being hit by the heat of the sun from
the southern exposure you mentioned.
If I were in your situation, I would:
1. Talk to my local paint store or contact a painting contractor
(you can usually get them to look at your house and pump them
for info without hiring them!) to try to discover what may have
caused the peeling.
Assuming they say it was just cheap paint or thinned paint,
2. Lightly sand the bare spots to remove any loose masonite-- use
100 or 120 grit paper.
3. Prime the bare spots with a latex primer (such as Muralo) --
feathering the primer out onto the existing painted surface.
4. Put two coats (do not try 1 thick coat) of good quality, latex
house paint on the siding.
BTW: On my house, I used a 4" brush with Californian
Hearthstone (gray) and did not see any brush marks, etc.
Good luck,
VCS
|
114.92 | Thanks for the advice | MONET::FERWERDA | Loptson | Fri Aug 29 1986 11:12 | 12 |
| Well, thanks everyone for the advice. After reading the replies
in this file, talking to some other folks, and talking to paint
places we decided to do essentialy what Van said in the last note.
This morning I purchased some latex primer to touch up spots where
we got down to the base Masonite, and purchased latex paint to go
over that. We ended up buying the paint from the Franklin Paint
factory store and we'll see eventually what kind of quality their
paint really is.
Thanks,
Paul
|
114.93 | if it ain't brushed on it ain't painted | OLORIN::SEGER | | Fri Aug 29 1986 14:16 | 19 |
| Having painted my way though college I couldn't resist in getting in a
comment about spraying or pads. From my experience, virtually every house
I heard of that was sprayed had to be repainted within a couple (or less)
years. The problem being that to spray paint one needs to thin it enough to
get it through the nozzle! If you then put it on too thick it runs. The result
it you MUST put on a very thin coat. Thin coat = no durability = possible
pealing. I think the same probably holds true for a pad.
I always use a brush and have had very good luck. NEVER buy a cheap brush. It
is not unreasonable to spend over $10 for a good 4 incher (unless you go to
SPAGS where they can be had for around $7 ror $8).
Finally, to avoid brush streaks, I always paint in two steps. First apply the
paint in any way necessary to cover what you painting. Then, immediately go
over it a second time in the direction of the grain to smooth out the streaks
(this translates to vertical for shingles/shakes and horizontal for clapboards).
You will not see any streaks when you're through.
-mark
|
114.94 | Busy? How busy were you ...? | ERLANG::BD | Brian D. Handspicker | Thu Sep 04 1986 17:17 | 38 |
| Paul & Folks,
Sorry for not responding to questions in .2. I've been too
busy the last week or so to get into my "play" notebook.
My recommendation was to use akalyd paint as the only as a primer
if you were trying to put oil over the old latex. It should work
just as well over the bare spots as over the old latex. Alkalyd
is nice paint, but it's a bit expensive to suggest using for a top
coat.
Unfortunately I don't have a standard list of questions to ask ....
We went through a similar problem a few years ago. I found paint
contractors to be helpful, but very narrow in their knowledge
of peeling problems ("Well, the *last* time I saw a house peeling
it was because ...."). We talked with 5 different contractors
and got 5 different theories. I found Johnson Paint Co. (corner
of Newbury St. and Mass Ave, Boston) to be extremely knowledgeable.
They covered the 5 scenarios described by our 5 contractors, plus
a few more, and then tolds us how to figure out which was the
problem and what to do about it. Johnson Paint is one of the major
painting contractor supply houses. They know their field.
We also found that the Time-Life book on painting was helpful.
The two problems we settled on (gee, I wish I could be more definitive
about it) were the classic moisture problem compounded by ice
dams backing up and dripping down inside the walls and application
of the last coat of paint (just 2 years previous at the time) on
a hot sunny summer day. Evidently, if you paint in the hot sun,
the paint does not dry properly.
We solved our problems by venting, repairing facia and soffits,
repairing the gutters and repainting on cloudy days ... of course,
this forced us to go to the beach on the sunny days. ;^)
Good luck with your project.
bd
|
114.97 | Staining Vertical Siding | NAAD::GERMANN | | Thu Sep 11 1986 10:00 | 7 |
| I am in need of some advice for staining vertical siding.
The house is 2 story (3 at the peak). Does anyone have
any hints on staining so that there are no overlap marks?
Do I have to stain from top to bottom, meaning lots of
trips up and down the ladder?
Thanks -- Ellen
|
114.98 | | LATOUR::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Thu Sep 11 1986 15:35 | 7 |
|
If you're using a ladder (that is, not staging), working vertically
really doesn't mean extra trips up the ladder. Just do what's in
reach, and then move the ladder down, rather than over. Keep the
current staining area within vertical detail lines, and complete
a vertical slice once you start it, and you shouldn't have a problem
with overlap marks.
|
114.104 | Anybody ever installed cedar shingles? | ALIEN::PETROVIC | Just a willow in the wind... | Fri Sep 12 1986 10:31 | 12 |
| Well, I'm about ready to begin shingling my ~20 year old house. It's got
t-111 siding on it now. I intend to use 18" red cedar R&R shingles that
will be dipped in clear Cuprinol as per the can's directions. All the
trim has been repaired/replaced and repainted. So, I ask:
1. Have any of you done such a project?
2. What helpful hints have you?
Oh, one more thing. I CANNOT remove the rake boards so as to install the
shingles UNDER them. I realize that butting the shingles up against the
rake board isn't the generally accepted method, but I have no choice.
Are there any hints for this situation?
|
114.99 | | NAC::SEGER | | Fri Sep 12 1986 15:42 | 23 |
| Something I've seen done hundreds of times that makes me cringe is people
painting in the sun. Though it probably doesn't hurt the paint (can't be
sure), it certainly makes it dry out quicker. It is painting/staining wet
over dry that is the main cause of lap marks.
re:-1
I agree you really shouldn't have to make many trips up/down the ladder. One
of the big causes of this is many people like to position the base of the ladder
a long way from the foundation making it impossible to reach the wall when you
climb down even a few feet. I had always been taught to keep the ladder as
vertical as possible (within reason!) primarily to take the strain off it (I
always use wooden ladders which are probably not as strong as aluminum) and as
a side product keep you close to the wall. It can get a little scary (I've
worked as high a 30 feet with the base of the ladder probably no further than
5 or 6 feet from the house), but if you're careful it's not all that bad.
If you're not used to spending a lot of time on a ladder you may want to
compromise and move the base out a couple of feet more to a distance where you
feel safe and can still reach a reasonable amount of wall.
-mark
|
114.105 | I've been there! | NAC::SEGER | | Fri Sep 12 1986 15:56 | 39 |
| I put up around 20 squares of hand split cedar shakes around 5 years ago.
Nothing could have ever prepared me for the enormity of the task. Not
difficult, just time consuming. BTW, I don't know about todays prices, but
at Coldwells in Berlin, Ma, I saved around $40 per square.
Anyhow, I assume you'll be working off staging (can't imagine any other way!).
Some tools that I found invaluable:
- shingle hatchet. looks like a regular hatchet only smaller.
has a hammer on one end but I would never dream of using it
since while nailing the blade it aimed right between your
eyes!
- small block plane to square edges after trimming a shingle
with the hatchet
- nail puller. don't know what you call this but you hammer it
under a nail and then pry the nail out. there are always a
couple of shingles that you have to remove for various reasons
- kitchen garbage can (kind that might fit under a sink) - I
pretreated my shingles by filling the can with Cupirnol and
dipping shinges into it. worked real well!
- hot zinc dipped nails - these are really rough and hold real
well
- hammer holster - if you don't have one, these are a must for
shingling
- nail apron - same as hamme holster
- tweezers - for all the splinters you're gonna get!!!
If you want to talk in more detail, feel free to send me some mail.
-mark
|
114.100 | ladder safety | LATOUR::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Sun Sep 14 1986 19:30 | 13 |
| re .-1
It's probably not a very good idea to limit the slope of the ladder
just to save climbing trips, because by doing so you're cutting
down on a margin of safety that can get especially important as
you get tired. Most ladders (thanks to OSHA) nor have a sticker
on them that graphically illustrated the proper slope.
In rough terms, yo should be able to stand up straight on a rung,
extend your arms comfortably, and be able to grasp the sides of the
ladder. Any more lean, and you're putting too much stress on the
ladder and too much horizontal force on its feet; any less, and
you're inviting a tumble from dangerous heights.
|
114.101 | maybe wooden ladders have different guidelines | NAC::SEGER | | Tue Sep 16 1986 13:22 | 16 |
| My comment about limiting the slope certainly sounded like I was intending it
to save trips, but I was really saying it to from a safety perspective. I
have (and always will) use wooden ladders. My ladder is about 30-40 years old
and in top shape. However, if I slope it too much, it will flex under my weight
and this is inviting trouble. I had been told (and it makes sense to me), that
by limiting the slope, ones puts a lot less tension on the ladder itself.
Also, if the slope is too great, the ladder might kick out from under you. This
is especially true is working with a ladder on a smooth surface such as a
sidewalk or driveway.
As to standing vertical on a ladder and extending your arms to the sides,
wouldn't that create a slope in the 30 degree range? If so, someone weighing
a 200 pounds would end up exerting 50-75 (can't remember the equation) pounds
of horizontal thrust!
-mark
|
114.106 | Quality is job one | ANCHOR::LEVESQUE | | Wed Sep 17 1986 13:59 | 12 |
|
Hi Folks, I recently shingled my parents, seven room cape with
a full dormer. It took a few days but with quality shingles the
job was a breeze. I only had to trim the edge shingles. Other than
that they were perfect.
Any place you you butt theshingle up against something you should
seal it with some silicone. I was told to do this around all trim
wood and any place were the shingles met another surface. Hope this
info helps and have fun.
Brian @pk
|
114.107 | When do you apply silicone caulking? | ALIEN::PETROVIC | Just a willow in the wind... | Thu Sep 18 1986 11:13 | 5 |
| > Any place you you butt theshingle up against something you should
> seal it with some silicone. I was told to do this around all trim
> wood and any place were the shingles met another surface.
Do you seal during installation or afterwards?
|
114.108 | caulking is inportant! | ANCHOR::LEVESQUE | | Thu Sep 18 1986 11:52 | 13 |
|
Like say around a window trim put the caulking on first then butt
the shingles up against it. This in effect give it a weather tight
seal. You'd be surprised were rain can get. My parents home hadn't
been done like that originally and the wood around the windows was
really beat. Also the trim boards that run up and down corners of
the house are good places to caulk. I'd have to say around windows
and doors is the most inportant though.
Brian @pk
|
114.102 | slope of a ladder | HARPO::B_HENRY | Bill Henry | Thu Sep 18 1986 15:08 | 14 |
| I don't remember what note it was in, but there was a discussion
elsewhere on the way to properly slope a ladder. It is important
to repeat. As any firefighter can tell you....stand at the base of
the ladder with your toes in line with the bottom of the ladder.
If the ladder is sloped correcty, you should be able to put your
hands out in front of you (while standing upright) and place the
palms of your hands on a rung at somewhere around shoulder level.
Positioning the ladder at that slope give it the best stability and
ease of climb. Any steaper, you may find you and the ladder going
over backwards when you are working near the top. Any shallower,
the bottom WILL be very likely to kick out.
Bill
|
114.103 | ban aluminum ladders | NAC::SEGER | | Mon Sep 22 1986 10:00 | 26 |
| I'm still quite fascinated by this business about extending your hands and
touching a rung. Having thought about it I think I'm convinced it may apply
to the type of the ladder.
I've been on an aluminum ladder once! I recall being about 15 or 20 feet off
the ground and almost getting blown over by a gust of wind! Those suckers are
so light I'm sure one has to go out of their way to stabilize them. As for the
amount of slope, they're strong enough that the amount you're suggesting is
probably safe enough. As I said above, I've been on an aluminum ladder once,
though I had spent 7 summers during college painting houses. Personally I
don't see why OSHA doesn't ban them. For my money they are about the most
dangerous things there are...
Now as for a wooden ladder. I've used ladders as big as 40 footers and if you
slope them too much, they'll bounce as you go up/down them. However, if you
make they fairly vertical they become very rigid. As far as the ladders falling
backwards, they're so heavy (the big one weighs over 100 lbs) you'd have to try
real hard. The other beauty about a wooden ladder is that you can literally
reach at least 4 feet in either direction without any fear of falling, allowing
you do as much as an 8 foot wide stip without having to move the ladder. Again,
the weight allows you to do this. With an aluminum ladder I wouldn't feel safe
doing much more than a 3 or 4 foot wide strip.
[enough flaming, but i just HATE aluminum ladders!]
-mark
|
114.120 | CLAPBOARD OVER ASPHALT SHINGLE | ROLL::CIAVOLA | | Mon Sep 29 1986 15:01 | 17 |
| HAS ANYONE TRIED TO CLAPBOARD OVER ASPHALT SHINGLE? WE HAVE A 75
YEAR OLD BARN THAT HAS ASPHALT SHINGLE ON IT. WE WOULD LIKE TO
SAVE THE TIME OF STRIPPING OFF THE SHINGLE, AND JUST PUT THE PINE
CLAPBOARD OVER IT. DOES ANYONE KNOW OF A REASON WHY WE SHOULDN'T
DO THAT?
PAM C.
|
114.121 | pine is cheap stuff for clapboards | NAC::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Mon Sep 29 1986 17:16 | 8 |
| lowercase, please...
No idea about what problems this would cause other than the fact that pine
is NOT very good stuff to make clapboards out of. It's certainly cheaper
than cedar, but I've seen cases where it has had to be replaced in less than
10 years due to cracking, warping, etc...
-mark
|
114.122 | Pine rots easily | CACHE::BRETSCHNEIDE | | Tue Sep 30 1986 14:24 | 3 |
| White pine also rots easily.
bb
|
114.123 | | SNICKR::PIERPONT | | Wed Oct 01 1986 08:15 | 1 |
| According to Coldwell's the cedar guys are no strike/high tarrif.
|
114.124 | DESPERATELY SEEKING CEDAR CLAPBOARDS | RINGO::FINGERHUT | | Fri Oct 24 1986 09:13 | 6 |
|
Does anyone know where I can get red cedar clapboards? Anywhere
in Massachusetts or NH.
Dave
|
114.125 | | EXODUS::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Fri Oct 24 1986 09:51 | 7 |
| I got some last fall at GV Moores in Ayer (branch in Littleton also).
The Ayer number is 772-0900 (no, i didn't look it up, I just call them a
lot). They are not known for their prices, just their convenience. I
can't remember the price, but since I only bought 3 6 footers, I wasn't
too worried about it.
-mark
|
114.126 | Already tried Moore's | RINGO::FINGERHUT | | Fri Oct 24 1986 09:59 | 5 |
| I already tried them. Basically, I've called all the major
lumberyards in the area. I was just hoping someone might know
of a place hidden away somewhere that has been hoarding it.
I need 3800 linear feet.
|
114.127 | Found: Red Cedar Clapboard! | USMRW1::RKILGUS | | Fri Oct 24 1986 10:01 | 8 |
| Try Lamson's Lumber in Hudson, Mass. - 562-3431. I just sided an
addition I built with some nice 3 1/2 to the weather red cedar claps
that I got from Lamson's. They gave me mostly 16 foot lengths,
usually rare when you order clapboard. Lamson's is competitively
priced on almost all their stock lumber.....best prices in the area
I have found.
ROB
|
114.128 | Coldwells | SNICKR::PIERPONT | | Fri Oct 24 1986 10:06 | 14 |
| There is a new Import Duty starting 11/1. I believe its 28%. I was
told that the manufactures were holding back product in hopes that
the duty will be repealed.
I had to settle on Redwood. At Coldwell's I paid $.90 per surface
foot. I could not get any cedar except finger jointed and that was
in limited qty.
Remember that coverage is Square Footage x 1.5 = Surface boards
needed.
Good luck.
Howard
|
114.129 | Another source.. | BRUTWO::COUTURE | | Fri Oct 24 1986 10:24 | 5 |
| I bought some at Chairtown lumber in Gardner, Ma about a month
ago. Execellent quality but expensive.
Steve
|
114.130 | No Red Cedar Clapboards yet... | RINGO::FINGERHUT | | Fri Oct 24 1986 11:38 | 9 |
| re: .3 Lamson's - They don't have any (or at least said they don't)
re: .4 Redwood clapboards - I might have to go with them, even
though it won't match the rest of my house. Concord Lumber in
Mass offered Cyprus. Anybody know anything about that?
re: .5 Chairtown - They said they only have 3 foot lengths.
|
114.131 | Where I got mine.. | MOSAIC::BOWKER | | Fri Oct 24 1986 12:24 | 15 |
| Try Gerrity lumber in the Boston area. The account rep I used was
named Marshall Adams, working out of Franklin/Foxboro/Attleboro/Mansfield
area. They scouted up over 3K linear feet of bundled 4" x random
length red clapboards for me last year. Beautiful, quality stuff.
You may have to try and get a friendly local contractor to front for
you in purchasing this stuff, but in the quantity you're looking at
it will be worth the effort.
Make sure you use HOT Dipped galvanized nails when you install.
The heads on the electroplated ones have absolutely no meat to them
after one hit of a hammer, starting to rust and and stain almost
immediately.
/roger
|
114.132 | Cedar clapboards | RINGO::FINGERHUT | | Fri Oct 24 1986 12:30 | 7 |
| re: .7 - Gerrity - They don't have any.
I think I've just about given up. Does anybody know how
different redwood looks from Cedar after it's been stained
with semi-transparent dark stain.
I guess I'll try a small piece and find out.
|
114.133 | Hurry, hurry, hurry!!! | SEINE::CJOHNSON | My heart belongs to Daddy! | Fri Oct 24 1986 13:17 | 6 |
|
Try Lancaster/Sterling Lumber in Sterling. I just bought 6200 linear
feet at .49/foot. They just received [Tuesday- 10/21] over 60,000
feet. But hurry it won't last at those prices!!!
Charlie
|
114.134 | ??? | SNICKR::PIERPONT | | Fri Oct 24 1986 13:24 | 3 |
| How are they pricing the siding??
Howard
|
114.135 | But hurry!!!!!! | SEINE::CJOHNSON | My heart belongs to Daddy! | Fri Oct 24 1986 13:43 | 3 |
| They get $.49/linear foot for grade "A".
Charlie
|
114.136 | Price it out... | SNICKR::PIERPONT | | Fri Oct 24 1986 14:14 | 13 |
| O.K. folks lets see how we really figure prices.
I needed to cover 220 sf. Boards are 6" wide with 2" overlap.
So I needed 330 sf surface for the project. I paid $.90 per sf
surface for the boards. So the linear price is only $.45.
It's tough enough tryning to explain to people how to figure their
needs for siding compared to roofing. Then try and price it out.
BTW finger jointed Cedar [must be stained DARK or painted] is $.85
surface sf.
Howard
|
114.137 | Sterling Lumber | RINGO::FINGERHUT | | Fri Oct 24 1986 14:48 | 4 |
| Sterling lumber looks good. I'm going to check it out this
afternoon. I assume pricing is done board/ft just like any other
lumber. For siding, 2 linear feet = 1 board ft.
|
114.138 | Who said math was easy ;)? | SEINE::CJOHNSON | My heart belongs to Daddy! | Fri Oct 24 1986 15:34 | 7 |
| Dave,
That's right that 2 linear feet = 1 board ft., but don't forget
that you will 3 linear feet to cover 1 "square foot" assuming a
4" exposure.
Charlie
|
114.139 | Linear =/= Board ' =/= surface | SNICKR::PIERPONT | | Fri Oct 24 1986 16:04 | 14 |
| RE .13 & .14
A board foot is 12" x 12" x 1" thick or its =.
A 2x6 8' long has 8 board feet
A 1x6 8' long has 4 board feet
Siding is sold either linear or surface square but not board foot
because is is cut on an angle.
{I know there is an engineer out there who can tell me how many
linear feet of siding it would take to make a board foot. Most folks
trying to buy the stuff won't understand.}
Howard
|
114.140 | GV Moores still has some | CADZOO::HARDING | | Mon Oct 27 1986 13:05 | 7 |
| I just purchased 400 sq ft from GV Moores in Littleton last week.
It cost about $600 + . They told me that Cedar siding is becoming
very hard to get. I got 8 inch really 7 1/2 inch wide in mixed lengths
from 5 foot to 16 foot.
dave
|
114.141 | I found it. | RINGO::FINGERHUT | | Mon Oct 27 1986 19:15 | 12 |
| I had tried Moore's in Ayer but not in Littleton.
Anyway, I got the clapboards delivered today from Sterling
Lumber.
Thanks for all the replies.
BTW: while I was there I saw that they have hard (yellow)
T&G pine in various widths. It's $1.25/ board foot. This
might be of interest to people, because it's not always
easy to find.
|
114.566 | Weathering/Color Lightening Stuff | TRACTR::DOWNS | | Mon Nov 03 1986 12:19 | 10 |
| I need some help! I stained my cedar clapboard house alittle darker
then I wanted, or should I say what my wife wanted. Anyways she
has threaten to do me in if I don't do something about the dark
color. I've heard that there is some kind of bleaching oil/stain
that can be used to help lighten and speed weathering of the new
siding. Is there such a product and has oneone used anything like
it.
Any suggestions/opinions would be appreciated. Thanks in advance!
|
114.567 | Restain... but ask your wife FIRST | DRUID::CHACE | | Mon Nov 03 1986 13:15 | 6 |
| Bleaching oil or bleaching stain is ONLY for previosly bare wood.
You could put it on but it would not have the desired effect. Why
not restain with a lighter (one your wife likes) color solid-color
oil stain?
Kenny
|
114.568 | | VINO::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Mon Nov 03 1986 15:00 | 6 |
|
Yes, buy some solid-color stain in the correct shade...
... and give your wife the paint brush.
|
114.569 | I LOVE MY WIFE TOO! | BURREN::WATERSJ | THE LEGEND OF THE LAKES | Mon Nov 03 1986 16:00 | 3 |
| WELL LETS HEAR IT FOR WILD BILL!!! GO HOME TONIGHT AND CUT A NICE
PIECE OF WOOD TO FIT THE PALM OF YOUR WIFES HAND!! IT WILL MAKE
A GREAT SANDING BLOCK!! HAVE FUN HONEY!!;-)
|
114.570 | Looks Like A Waiting Game | TRACTR::DOWNS | | Tue Nov 04 1986 07:26 | 9 |
| Thanks for the earlier suggestions. I considered solid stain but
don't want to completely obscure the grain of the cedar siding.
The existing stain is semi-transparent but is just to dark for our
liking. I was hoping there was a product that would lighten existing
stain or a ccelerate the weathering process, which in turn wouls
lighten the general appearance. Looks like I'll just tell the old
girl to wait around another 5 or 10 years until mother nature lightens
it for us.
|
114.571 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Tue Nov 04 1986 12:50 | 5 |
| You might try writing to the manufacturer and see if they have any
ideas. Chlorox or oxalic acid might work - try a small section -
but I'm doubtful.
Steve
|
114.572 | Hurry, hurry, hurry...step right up m' lad.. | SEINE::CJOHNSON | My heart belongs to Daddy! | Wed Nov 05 1986 07:20 | 8 |
| I recently saw a product at Webbers that claimed to restore
weathered [grey] wood to it's original "wood" color. This was
it's main claim to fame, however it also claimed that it would
remove semi-transparent stain as well. This may only be 20th
century snake oil, but it may be worth checking out prior to the
divorce proceedings ;).
Charlie
|
114.573 | | EXODUS::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Wed Nov 05 1986 12:40 | 12 |
| I recently had to wash my house to get the mildew off before restaining.
I used a mixture of TSP and Bleach! As I washed, I noticed a fair
amount of the previous stain came off. In fact, the house almost looked
like it had been painted.
HOWEVER, these were some of the worst days of my life. It was a
miserable job and I for one wouldn't want to imply it would even
accomplish the desired effect. However, if you're desparate and you
wife is willing to help if might be worth doing a single wall and
checking the results.
-mark
|
114.574 | Oh yah, I almost forgot.... | SEINE::CJOHNSON | My heart belongs to Daddy! | Thu Nov 06 1986 07:52 | 8 |
| One other thing that I forgot to mention in .6 was that this stuff
could be applied with a sprayer attached to your garden hose. Of
course, it will probably also defoliate all your shrubs and turn
your lawn a wonderful shade of black, but your stain will be off.
Hey! You can't have everything, right?
Charlie
|
114.513 | Ship-Lap Pine Question | FRSBEE::PAGLIARULO | | Fri Mar 27 1987 12:37 | 13 |
| I'm putting interior finish in a porch I built last year. After pricing
paneling and ship-lap pine boards, it's cheaper to put in the pine. I've
never used ship lap pine before and have a couple of questions. The studs are
about 18'' on center and I'm using 8'' wide boards. Since there's large windows
all around the longest board willl only be about 25"". Do I need to have a
nailer for support behind each joint (every 8'')? Do the boards get face
nailed or do you nail through the edge overlap? If face nailed, what do you
think of those black nails with the heavy heads that are sometimes used on
floors? Do these rust?
Thanks in advance for the help.
George
|
114.514 | Installing ship lap boards | SEESAW::PILANT | L. Mark Pilant | Fri Mar 27 1987 13:01 | 21 |
| Whether or not a nailer is required would depend on the orientation
of the boards. If you are running the boards perpendicular to the
studs, the you don't need a nailer/strapping. However, if you are
running the boards parallel to the studs, then you will need to
add a nailer. This is particularly true for long boards.
You mention that the longest board is about 25". Is this the distance
from the sill/sole plate to the header (under the window)? If it
is, the you could probably leave out the strapping (when running
parallel).
One more thing to consider. If you do find yourself having to include
a nailer/strapping, remember that this will increase the effective
thickness of the wall. This may require some adjustments of any
window or door frames present in the room.
As for nailing, I prefer to hide the nails rather than have them
exposed. Thus requiring the nails to go through the edge joint
and then followed up with the trusty nail-set.
- Mark
|
114.515 | Another dumb question | KELVIN::RPALMER | Half a bubble off plumb | Fri Mar 27 1987 13:19 | 1 |
| For those of us who are 'wood lingo' dummys, what is ship lap boards?
|
114.516 | | FRSBEE::PAGLIARULO | | Fri Mar 27 1987 13:50 | 7 |
| Ship lap has rabbets along each side like so:
_________________
| |
___| ---
|________________|
|
114.517 | | PLANET::WHITBY | | Fri Mar 27 1987 14:02 | 6 |
| George, I just finished installing knotty pine planking in my breezeway
this winter, wasn't cheap but the end result was nice. Make sure
you stain the boards before putting them up, also you will need
to extend out all electrical boxes, 3/4'' without strapping, 1 1/2''
with. I had to buy electrical box extensions, I got them at Marlboro
Electric supply.
|
114.518 | | FRSBEE::PAGLIARULO | | Fri Mar 27 1987 14:05 | 21 |
| Re: Note 940.1
>> One more thing to consider. If you do find yourself having to include
a nailer/strapping, remember that this will increase the effective
thickness of the wall.
I don't understand why this would be so. I will probably add a
nailer parallel to the floor between the studs this won't increase the
thickness at all. Do you mean nailed across the studs rather than
between them? Is there a benefit to doing it this way?
>> As for nailing, I prefer to hide the nails rather than have them
exposed. Thus requiring the nails to go through the edge joint
and then followed up with the trusty nail-set.
Are pilot holes necessary to keep from splitting the wood when nailing
so close to the edge?
Thanks
|
114.519 | Strapping?? Nailer?? | FRSBEE::PAGLIARULO | | Fri Mar 27 1987 14:11 | 10 |
| < Note 940.4 by PLANET::WHITBY >
>>...also you will need to extend out all electrical boxes, 3/4'' without
strapping, 1 1/2'' with.
As in my response to .1 I guess I'm getting my terms mixed up. What
is considered strapping and what is it's purpose? Does it differ from adding a
"nailer"?
George
|
114.520 | | PLANET::WHITBY | | Fri Mar 27 1987 14:20 | 3 |
| Strapping is 1"x 3" boards nailed horizontally across your 2 x 4's,
needed if you install your boards vertically. Probably the same
thing as the nailer you refer to.
|
114.521 | | SEESAW::PILANT | L. Mark Pilant | Fri Mar 27 1987 15:03 | 31 |
| RE: .5
The reason I mentioned about the thickness is that most people
will find it MUCH easier to nail the strapping across the studs
rather than fit it between the studs.
The family room I'm building has almost a complete redwood (T&G)
interior. Since the planks are parallel to the studs and rafters,
I'd go crazy (more so than I already am) in short order if I had
to fit a nailer between the studs.
So far, I haven't had to use any pilot holes. But then, I'm
putting up 1x6 T&G redwood, so I have a fair amount of wood
through which I can nail. If I were using oak or some other
hardwood, I would probably have to use pilot holes.
RE: Strapping vs nailer
As far as I know, a nailer is simply a piece of wood that is
used to back up another piece that is being nailed. Strapping
(usually 1x3 strips) is simply a specific application of a
nailer.
RE: Outlet extensions
I was faced with this problem also. However, I did not like
the idea of using extensions. Instead, I nailed a 2x4 between
the desired studs, and then screwed the box onto this 2x4 with
pan head screws. Worked out quite well, and they are VERY secure.
- Mark
|
114.522 | here's how I did it | BOEHM::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Fri Mar 27 1987 15:45 | 58 |
| I just did a cellar wall with V-Groove which has all the problems (amd more)
or shiplap.
Not wanting to nail strapping on top of the studs AND not wanting to put blocks
between the studs, I simply cut notches into each stud and set the strapping in
the notches.
Big job you ask? not at all...
tack a piece of strapping to the studs to use as a guide for a
circular saw.
set your circular saw depth to the depth of the strapping
cut across all the studs in one swell foop
lower the strapping and make a second cut such that you define the width
of the strapping
now use the circular saw to make multiple cuts between the two other
cuts
clean up with a chisel
you DO have to cut the notches with a chisel on the end studs
set strapping into notches and nail
It took me no more than 15 minutes to notch about 15 studs in two places.
Also note that this method eliminates the need for strapping at the top and
bottom since the plates now become your nailer.
I don't see how how you can avoid nail holes. with shiplap, only one edge is
ever hidden. if you HAVE to hide nail heads you can use V-Groove and nail it
backwards since the back is NOT grooved.
outside
_____________________________________
___| ___| ___| ___|
|____________|____________|___________|
^ ^ ^
| | |
| | |
nails: notice that only the left side of any board is secure!
If using V-Groove, I wouldn't use anything much wider than 6"-8" because you
won't get a whole lot of holding power on wide boards only nailed at the edges.
If you're top nailing, make them as wide as you like.
-mark
btw - I had to predrill all my holes in the pine because the tongues are only
1/4 thick and split VERY easily. solution -- cut the head off a nail and use
it as a drill
|
114.523 | | FRSBEE::PAGLIARULO | | Fri Mar 27 1987 16:04 | 5 |
| Is the 1X3 strapping used to nail into or just for support? It seems
like it would be too flexible to use to nail the boards to.
George
|
114.524 | More on planking walls | SEESAW::PILANT | L. Mark Pilant | Mon Mar 30 1987 09:59 | 13 |
| RE: .10
I used the 1x3 for both nailing and support. In my case, though,
I am putting the strapping up 12" O.C. (Since the redwood comes
in 1 foot increments.) Coupled with 16" O.C. for the studs,
the whole thing is really very sound.
Actually, the only area that is really 16" O.C. is the roof.
The remainder of the walls have enough windows that there are
only one or two spans on the wall that are a full 16". Most
are around 8" - 12" (because of all the trimmer & jack studs).
- Mark
|
114.525 | yea...I get it...one 'swell foop' | AMULET::YELINEK | | Mon Mar 30 1987 10:49 | 27 |
| RE: -.3 or soooo; Mr. Improvisio...
The idea of notching the studs w/ the circular saw appeals to me.
I've been draggin' my feet in completing my workshop 'cause my
intension is to put rough shiplap or v-groove pine parallel to
the studded wall, thus requiring nailers (or fire stops) mid-way
between the floor and the ceiling. This takes time and isn't a real
glamorous job.......till you sit back at the end of a day with
a beer in hand admiring the finished job. But it takes till the
end of the day to get there.
The idea of nailing the strapping to the otside of the studs saves
time but you loose a little area and the problem w/ the electrical boxes....
The notched stud idea (you really ought to patent this one)
allows you to extend the electrical boxes beyond the studs only
the thickness of the sheetrock + the thickness of the shiplap pine ect.
Since we're here.....What do you think about the rough sawed pine
in a workshop....I mean with saw dust and all. Is the smooth pine
preferred in this type of setting. I'm looking for the cheapest
solution. I realize the appearence is ones own choice...but I'm
wondering weather or not the sawdust gets into the rough stuff over
time...etc. Any comments here?
MArk
|
114.142 | Wood siding comparison | DSSDEV::CHALTAS | and what about Naomi? | Mon Apr 20 1987 10:13 | 12 |
| Anyone care to offer advice on house siding? My requirements
are
1) No vinyl
2) No aluminum
3) NO VINYL
4) no brick or stone veneer
5) NO VINYL!
I.e., I'm wondering about the merits and relative
costs of various kinds of wood siding.
|
114.143 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Tue Apr 21 1987 14:58 | 24 |
| What kind of siding looks good depends a lot on the style of the house. Some
houses just NEED clapboards, or at least shingles. Others BEG for vertical
siding. So part of your decision is probably already made. Also, are you
planning on painting this siding, or leaving it natural?
We sided our house two years ago, and these were the options we looked into.
Prices are only approximate, from memory, for about 3200 sq ft of siding.
Rough sawn pine, board and batten $1100
Rough sawn pine, shiplap $1800
Pine clapboards $2000
Vertical 1x6 t&g knotty redwood, on special $2600 (what we wound up with)
Cedar clapboards $3500
Vertical clear cedar or redwood $10000
I have no idea why vertical clear siding is so expensive, but if anything, it
(and the other cedar prices, including shingles) are probably more because of
the stupid trade war with Canada.
In short pine is cheap, but cedar is better.
Also, try dir/key=siding to find other notes on this subject.
Paul
|
114.149 | Reusing Clapboards | BOEHM::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Tue Apr 21 1987 15:22 | 12 |
| Has anybody had any experience with reusing clapboards? I hate the thought
of going out and buying new ones when the ones I have to remove from my back
wall are in perfect condition.
I've tried prying them off, but the insist on splitting at the nails OR the
nails simply pull through leaving big holes. My next strategy is to try and
saw the nails in half with a hacksaw blade after lifting the clapboard every so
little. I'm not very optimistic that this will work.
Are there any specialty tools made for this particular task?
-mark
|
114.150 | I thought the bad dream was over... | TALLIS::SAMARAS | Advanced Vax Engineering LTN | Tue Apr 21 1987 16:13 | 7 |
| I was going to re-use my clapboards last summer. Good idea, but
I ended up buying new ones. It was just too much work.
BTW, there are non-wood clapboards available. I've had GOOD luck
with them if you keep 'em painted.
....bill
|
114.151 | It can be done. | ULTRA::BUTCHART | | Tue Apr 21 1987 16:45 | 8 |
| I was able to gently remove a bunch of cedar clapboards using a
flat, wide pry bar. If I slid it up gently (well, relatively gently)
from below and got the nail in the notch, I could lift nail and
board together without splits or pull-throughs. It didn't work
on all of them, but I managed to get 80% off in reusable condition.
/Dave
|
114.152 | Another opinion | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Tue Apr 21 1987 16:45 | 15 |
| > BTW, there are non-wood clapboards available. I've had GOOD luck
> with them if you keep 'em painted.
To quote a certain comic-strip cat: Aaackk! Pfftt! Gaaack! O o
�*�
U
My parents have that "stuff" on their house, kept well painted, and it is pure
junk. The house is only 8 years old and already the siding should be replaced.
On a couple of places where the wall meets the roof of another section, they
totally disentegrated.
I wouldn't use 'em to side a dog house.
Paul
|
114.144 | cedar shakes | BOEHM::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Tue Apr 21 1987 17:05 | 10 |
| I sided my last house with hand-cut/resawn cedar shakes. I loved them, though
they were a MAJOR operation to put on. I wouldn't have thought it possible, but
I once timed myself doing a section about 12X6 and it took nearly a full day!
And that was after I had gotten pretty good at it. NOTHING about them is square
and they even vary in thickness, but they look soooo good.
As I recall, I paid around $54 a square (good for around 70 squage feet) but I
suspect they're a lot closer to $80 or $90 by now.
-mark
|
114.153 | | NONODE::JOLLIMORE | | Wed Apr 22 1987 11:52 | 8 |
| re: < Note 1048.2 by ULTRA::BUTCHART >
> If I slid it up gently (well, relatively gently)
> from below and got the nail in the notch, I could lift nail and
> board together without splits or pull-throughs.
Would it work to do the same thing, only instead of prying, tap the pry
bar from the bottom with a hammer to cut the nail???
|
114.154 | It's not that bad...I think! | TRACTR::DOWNS | | Wed Apr 22 1987 12:01 | 10 |
| I've taken down a few and from what I remember, it wasn't bad. I
believe we started from the top by slipping a hacksaw blade under
the next lower row. Cut the nails fairly easily, then after the
top row was off, the rest of the nails could be extracted by normal
methods.
Maybe I just dreamt it was easy! My father dropped a hammer on my
head during that last siding job and my memory hasn't been quite
the same.
|
114.145 | I vote Cedar Clapboard!!! | TRACTR::DOWNS | | Wed Apr 22 1987 12:11 | 1 |
|
|
114.155 | take your time, it's worth it | BOEHM::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Wed Apr 22 1987 13:25 | 17 |
| It worked!!!
Last night I tried slipping the pry bar under the nail and it would indeed
get the nail to come out. The trick is then to gently push the clapboard back
down forcing the nail head above the surface for easy removal. The only real
problem I encountered is that since I had a heavy pigmented stain on them, they
tend to stick to each other. Sometimes I find slipping in a putty knife lifes
the clapboard enough to get the prybar in. Usually you still have to pound it
in with a hammer since the nail MUST sit in the notch, otherwise the clapboard
will split.
Is it worth it? It took me about an hour to remove about 5 or 6 boards! But
they were all between 16 and 20 feet long. As I recall, don't they run
something around 50� a linear foot or so for cedar? At that price I earned
roughly $50/hour! I wonder what the job market is for clapboard removers. 8-)
-mark
|
114.156 | Why do it? | YODA::BARANSKI | 1's & 0's, what could be simpler?! | Wed Apr 22 1987 16:11 | 4 |
| This may seem like a dumb question, but if you have clapboards that are good
enough to be reused, why do you want to take them off?
Jim...
|
114.157 | I'm putting on an addition | BOEHM::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Wed Apr 22 1987 17:38 | 1 |
| -mark
|
114.158 | | MAGIC::HODGES | | Fri Apr 24 1987 09:49 | 13 |
| Dont laugh too hard but...
I removed a whole lot of clapboards in about 20 minutes one day
last summer at a friends house in Vt. The clapboards were about
100 years old, in perfect condition, and we just slipped a the blade
end of a long handled shovel under them and gave a tug. Sure we
broke a couple, but 90% of them came off without a hastle.
Beware, our success may be more related to the quality of the material
that we were removing than the validity of the technique.... I'm
not sure how it would work on knotty pine (ours was clear) or on
cedar.
- Rick
|
114.159 | Refinishing Home Siding | BARNUM::JORGENSEN | | Mon May 11 1987 16:52 | 27 |
|
After numerous $1200 paint jobs I have decided to refinish
the siding on my home right. The siding is cedar strips, about
5 inches wide, and was originally covered with brown Cabots
OVT. (OVT is cabots paint/stain which is really more paint than
stain, and more of a pain in the neck than any thing else) At
any rate the OVT was covered with grey stain about eight years
ago and it has bi anually required recoating because nothing
seems to stick to the OVT. I have had two professionals look
at it and they both concure on this prognosis. At any rate the
question now is what to do with the siding.
1. Sandblast the house
2. Flip the siding
3. Resided the house
The siding on the house is original, and about 30 years old...
but still in good condition. I have no experience with sand-
blasting and would appreciate any info on peoples experiences
with this solution. (one sandblaster estimated the job at $7k)
Is flipping the siding a viable option?? The house is about
3200 square feet and is 2 stories.
/Kevin
|
114.160 | it's NOT the stain | BOEHM::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Tue May 12 1987 09:21 | 22 |
| Hmmm...
I have some Cabots OVT on my house and although I too would prefer real stain,
I can't complain about what I have. It's great stuff. Goes on well, covers
well and is extremely durable.
When I did my house this past summer, I had mildew. This meant I had to scrub
my house (took several full days!) with a mixture of bleach and TSP (tri-sodium
phosphate - available at any hardware store (or SPAGS)).
There was absolutely NO problem with adhesion. If yours isn't sticking and all
the professionals you ask say it's because of the OVT, I'd say:
o get a real professional
o better yet, call CABOTS and ask them (that's what customer
services departments are for)
o there's a paint store in Lincoln that's a CABOT's distributer.
call them (they were very helpful to me)
-mark
|
114.161 | Cabot's | HOW::GILL | Russ Gill - ISTG:: | Tue May 12 1987 11:53 | 12 |
| Regarding Cabot's (OVT ??) - I have an old red barn which I will be improving
this Summer. The North side is to be completely replaced and stained (not red),
and the other 3 will be re-painted/re-stained. I'd like to match the appearance
of the existing sides with that of the new side, and am looking for something
which will cover the paint, and have the characteristics of stain (i.e. doesn't
peel, is absorbed by the wood, etc.).
Will Cabot's cover the existing paint and match the appearance of the stained
side ? If not, are there other products which will ?
Thanks,
Russ
|
114.162 | OVT covers well (at least in 2 coats) | BOEHM::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Tue May 12 1987 12:57 | 12 |
| As mentioned earlier, Cabot's OVT is closer to paint than stain. I'm not
really sure of the difference.
As far as covering, I had a blue-gray house that I restained a very close
shade of gray. I had replaced a couple of clapboards with some used ones from
a neighbor that were dark gray! I fugured if it didn't cover I'd spring the
extra $$$ for new ones. Lo and behold, you cannot tell where they were.
In other words, it does a real nice job of covering, but remember, I did 2
coats.
-mark
|
114.170 | Problems with Red Cedar Shakes | KNOVAX::GIOIELLI | | Thu Jun 18 1987 12:24 | 14 |
|
My problem is this. The front of my house is exposed to extreme
sunlight causing the red cedar shakes to "bleed" through the solid color
stain that I applied 2 years ago. The house now looks dirty from
the cedar oils on the stain.
Is there anything I can do to prevent this from happening again
when I re-stain this year. It's really frustrating to spend all
that time staining only to have it last looking good for a year
or so.
- mike g.
|
114.171 | | BOEHM::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Thu Jun 18 1987 12:53 | 5 |
| I imagine the shakes should be sealed or use a stain that specifically
says it will prevent bleeding.
-mark
|
114.163 | True Grit... | HBO::PENNEY | Now speaking with slight LISP... | Fri Jul 10 1987 08:50 | 33 |
| I had my house in Needham sandblasted (We've since gotten much smarter
and moved to NH ;-}), and it came out fairly well. It was a house
about 40+ years old at the time, and had cedar shingles. The paint on
them was unbelievable! The prior owners had obviously put latex over
oil, and the paint was flaking, chipping, and just a general mess. The
paint buildup was unbelievable! To make matters worse, a part-time
"painter" from the local fire department had "painted" the house, and
used a rotary sander! So there were obvious swirl marks on the
shingles. What was a harried homeowner to do? Blast it!
I left for a visit with my Canadian relatives while it was done. My
long-suffering spouse felt like she was at the beach. The sand got
everywhere! A few of my windows got etched in the corners, but nothing
serious. Even though the crew doing the work was very careful, sand
still came "through the cracks". And, the bottom of the shingles
didn't come clean \
\
--
^
|in here.
Sandblasting creates interesting effects in the wood, depending on
whether the wood is hard or soft in spots.
After I returned, I did the house in Cabot stain, believe I used the
solid. Looked great!
You can do it yourself. But you need the right kind of sand (believe
it's called "Black Beauty"). And, you have to mask everything you
don't want blasted. Be prepared for "true grit" too :-(
Bill
|
114.173 | Prepping/painting grooved shakes | 3D::SULLIVAN | | Tue Jul 14 1987 01:48 | 12 |
|
How do you strip the corrugated type cedar shakes
(the grooved kind) ? My house is about 30 years old,
I bought it 3 years ago. It has at least three coats of
paint on it with the last being latex. The paint is curling
up in the grooves. I'll be 90 before I could route each groove
with a knife, I can't afford sand blasting. Someone said I
can rent a water blaster that might work, any ideas ?
Has anyone else prepped this type of shake before ?
Any advice on priming ?
Mike
|
114.174 | it's a lot of work but..... | CSMADM::PILOTTE | Dr. Cycle & Mr. Ride | Tue Jul 14 1987 10:30 | 12 |
|
Try using a good stiff steel brush. It's a lot of work but
this is the method that I have always used and I have seemed to
get good results. The secret is that the little metal bristles
can get into each groove without damaging the cedar shakes.
For a primer, I have always used an oil base primer and if you
buy it from a respectable paint store they can tint the primer so
that it is almost the same shade as your finish coat.
mark
|
114.175 | prepping/priming shingles/shakes | 3D::WHITE | Randy White, 3D::White, DTN 296-6674, EXT (617)480-6674 | Tue Jul 14 1987 15:04 | 57 |
| < Note 1323.0 by 3D::SULLIVAN >
-< Prepping/painting grooved shakes >-
Re: .0
My parents had corrugated shakes about the same vintage as your
house, which I had the dubious job of prepping some years ago.
I am also in the process of painting my house which is approximately
60 year old cedar shingle.
So to put my 2 cents in...A Heavy wire hand brush for tight corners
preferably with a scraper blade to get in by mouldings is a must.
A technique which I have just tried and worked very well was to get
a 6 inch COARSE wire wheel and chuck it in my drill. Working across
the shingles with the wheel held at a forty-five degree angle did
a very satisfactory job of removing the loose paint. I would think
that this would also work very well for shakes. I had considered
using one of those wire flap type paint removers but was afraid that
I would end up removing too much of the wood as well. Total investment
about $6.50 for the wheel and $3.00 for the arbor, had the drill,
about 16 hours of time to strip approximately 1200 square feet of
shingles (two sides of the house were REAL badly alligatored) your
time will depend on condition also.
On the point of safety: Wire wheels will loose some of their wires
during use and the paint chips and just can be an aggravation too.
Purchase a full face shield instead of using goggles. You can probably
get by without a dust mask using the shield, I did. The advantages
are you are pretty completely protected and the face shield won't
steam up on you like goggles do. I'm also not wild about eating paint
which I didn't with this method. There is some room at the side so
if you do anything directly overhead be extra careful.
You don't mention how bad the current paint is or how old. My house
hadn't been painted in approximately 20 years. I opted to prime the
whole thing first so I would have a good solid base coat. I have
been very happy with Glidden paints. Glidden makes an oil base
primer that is specifically designed to work with either latex or
oil base topcoats. I like the idea of an oil base paint for a
primer especially where bare wood or new wood is concerned. Two
walls of my garage are primer only (hope to finish soon) and have
stood up to the past two New England winters and hurricane with no
problems! Also where they have been topcoatd (Glidden latex, after
all I'm not completely a masochist) they have stood up with no
problems. Incidentally I also brush the primer and first topcoat
on, following coats are sprayed. If you decide to spray the primer
I would recommend two coats instead of one, I tried spraying the
garage and although it worked satisfactorily it did have to have two
coats. Then again it was new wood.
One more thing before I get off my soap box. When you prime be
absolutely sure the wood is dry and its not to humid, latex is
somewhat tolerant to this but oil is very susceptible.
No I don't work for Glidden paints...
Good Luck - Randy
|
114.177 | cracks in pine siding? | INANNA::SUSEL | | Mon Aug 10 1987 09:52 | 6 |
| I have a house that has 1" pine board for siding. There are some
cracks in some of the boards, and I would like to fix them before
winter arrives. Does anyone have any experience with any outdoor
puttys for this reason?
Thanks,
|
114.178 | external spackling compound | LEDS3::TATE | | Tue Aug 11 1987 14:24 | 14 |
| I recently painted my house, and also fixed some cracks in the
6" clapboards. I was too lazy to replace the clapboards, and
afterwards realized I should have replaced some of them. Anyways,
I used external spackling compound (about $3 a can at Spags), and
just sanded it after drying. It worked real well on nail holes,
and gouged areas to fill them up, but tended to "bleed" through
the paint (primer + overcoat) a few days later. I'm not sure why
this happened, because the spackling dried several days before
being painted.
Other than that, the stuff is easy to work with, and sands real
smooth with minimal effort
Scott
|
114.180 | | WELFAR::PGRANSEWICZ | | Wed Aug 12 1987 13:49 | 5 |
| How about that spray foam insulation? It claims to be paintable
after it cures. Spray it in, let in cure, trim with a razor and
paint it. Sounds too easy. Something must wrong.
Phil
|
114.182 | Caulking Gun...easy to use, no sanding | NRADM3::MITCHELL | george..ya snooze - ya lose | Thu Aug 13 1987 17:45 | 8 |
|
I've used the DAP Latex caulk to seal cracks...can paint right
over it...even when its wet, providing you're using Latex paint.
...nothin' is permanent tho, cause the wood "works"
___GM___
|
114.183 | Comments solicited for Clapboard | CSCMA::KNORR | The Victory Bell has cobwebs! | Wed Aug 26 1987 21:48 | 12 |
| Anyone out there have any experience with clapboard? I checked
the stuff out at SL and it looks nice.
Specifically, how does it look (compared to paneling)? How difficult
was it to put up? Are there any tricks? What kind of nails did
you use?
Any suggestions/comments are appreciated!
- Chris
|
114.176 | Almost done. | 3D::SULLIVAN | | Thu Aug 27 1987 02:17 | 64 |
| Well... I'm just about done with the house painting and thought that I would
share my experiences with anyone who cares (or Randy won't give me any more
tips).
I rented the pressure washer from Taylor rental for about $70. It has a large
single cylinder gas engine and a hydraulic pump that puts out about 2200 psi !
It has a 50 foot high pressure hose with a gun and trigger business end.
You plug in your garden hose and WATCH OUT !
It comes with 4 spray tips ranging from 0 to 30 degrees, the 0 degree tip can
cut concrete, the 15 or 20 seems more useful. The system is best for washing
the house and removing LOOSE paint. It can remove all the paint but you will
damage the wood and or drown the house, it will chew gouges in the shingles if
you are not careful. There is a separate attachment that allows you to spray a
mix of TCP from a pale that will feed into the main stream but you have
to do this as a separate pass as it uses a different low pressure tip.
It will do most of the work but you still have to go back and scrape the loose
edges.
If you get one you will need a large station wagon or a truck. It's on wheels
and takes two people to load/unload it (or just one if your wife is mad at you
and you want to get a hernia to make her feel bad).
Watch out when using it on a ladder as it has about a 20 pound kick (I nearly
fell off !). Also, you and the house will get very wet.
I did a lot of caulking with GE II paintable silicone... great stuff but the
paintable stuff shed the paint just as well as the regular stuff. I think it
worked a little better when I primed just after applying it (still mushy). I
paid $5 a pop for about 8 plugs a week before it was on sale at Rich's for
$2.99 with a $2 rebate (&%$#^%&^^).
I had hoped to do the house with a single airless sprayer coat, but alas
the sprayer doesn't really work in the paint like a brush does. So I
decided to bush in a prime coat and then spray on the finish coat
I used a Wagner pro 200 and it worked just fine.
It's very fast and accurate and you get used to the weight (I can now crush
volkswagons in my right hand) if you break up the job over a few days or take
breaks every half hour (it won't clog up if not used for 20 min or so).
Other people have said that airless sprayers put down less paint and need
more coats, I found the opposite, if you use the recommended cross hatch
technique it puts down a lot of paint and one coat is fine.
For eaves and hard to get at stuff it's super. As to spattering, 1) don't let
the paint can get less than half full 2) replace the atomizer thingy every few
gallons or when it starts to spatter for no apparent reason.
The clean up is a pain in the bum, but once you get the knack it can be done in
15 min. I would not want to try the clean up with oil paint, when cleaning up
latex I used LOTS of water to flush the tube and other parts.
Make sure that everything is all ready to paint so you don't have to stop for
more than a few short breaks or you will have to clean the gun.
I bought the 0.8 mm latex tip and thinned each gallon with about one cup of
water and a turbo attachment on my drill to mix it (best $2 I ever spent).
OK Randy ?
Mike
|
114.184 | I clapboarded my house=instant expert! | CYGNUS::VHAMBURGER | Vic Hamburger IND-2/B4 262-8261 | Thu Aug 27 1987 10:01 | 30 |
|
> Anyone out there have any experience with clapboard? I checked
> the stuff out at SL and it looks nice.
> Specifically, how does it look (compared to paneling)? How difficult
> was it to put up? Are there any tricks? What kind of nails did
> you use?
I'm not sure what kind of paneling you are referring to when you want to
compare it to clapboards. I have re-clapboarded my entire house and have
*lots* of experience with clapboards for outside application, including how
to hang a 12-14' clapboard all by myself while up on the ladder. Will be
happy to expound/expand further if exterior clapboard is what you are
doing.
Difficulty of application is not bad. you are not dealing with much weight,
just some fine fitting and sometimes some long pieces. Basic tools were a
fine tooth backsaw for trimming, a block plane set fine and razor sharp, a
good 16 oz hammer, level, homemade guage to set each board with the same
amount of exposure as the others, and _lots_ of patience......8^)
Nails were generally 7d box, galvanized. Get GOOD galvanized nails, if they
ain't rough and sharp, they are just plated and will not last. Slumberville
has only the poorly galvanized nails from what I have ever found. I got the
better grade of nails at my local lumber yard.
If you want comments on all my tricks and short cuts, please reply and I
will enter it here.
Vic
|
114.185 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Thu Aug 27 1987 11:14 | 6 |
| Re: .1
Sure! Let us know how you did it. About the only thing I know
about putting up clapboards is that you're supposed to pre-measure
the side of the house so you get convenient alignment at the tops
and bottoms of window frames, and don't end up needing skinny strips
to fill in.
|
114.186 | Thinking of using clapboard INSIDE | CSCMA::KNORR | The Victory Bell has cobwebs! | Thu Aug 27 1987 12:43 | 12 |
| Re: .1
Thanks for the info! Any additional insights would be appreciated.
Maybe I'm way off base here, but I was going to clapboard an *inside*
room. I'd heard (or thought I'd heard!) someone telling me they
either did or were going to use clapboard for a den. (Unfortunately
I can't remember where I heard it ...)
Again, thanks for the reply.
- Chris
|
114.187 | T&G red cedar...close? | SEESAW::PILANT | L. Mark Pilant | Thu Aug 27 1987 12:46 | 7 |
| RE: .3
I'm doing up the inside of a family room I'm building with T&G
red cedar. A little different, but not much. I'll be happy
to answer any questions I can.
-Mark
|
114.188 | cedar siding inside walls | MPGS::ROGUSKA | | Thu Aug 27 1987 18:34 | 12 |
| My parents have cedar siding on the inside walls of there house,
entry way, living room (only one wall), and dining room (again only
one wall). I think it looks great. I think a lot of it has to
do with the house having a very open floor plan, but in a large
room it can look great.
The only maintenance that I know of that my father has done since
it was installed was that he waxed it a few years ago (not shiney,
just enough to brighten it up.) BTW, it was installed some 31 odd
years ago!
|
114.189 | Down with sheetrock! | STAR::SWIST | Jim Swist ZKO1-1/D42 381-1264 | Fri Aug 28 1987 09:43 | 15 |
| I have a house where *all* interior walls are red cedar 1x8 T&G,
including closet interiors.
I did it out of spite and frustration over many years of trying
to do decent sheetrock jobs of various types, and never being satisfied
with the results.
It takes a while to put up, but when it's up, it's finished. No
taping, no goop, no sanding, no painting, no wallpapering, no staining.
Also happy to answer any questions about application, hints, tricks,
etc.
Jim
|
114.190 | Hints on Clapboards. | CYGNUS::VHAMBURGER | Vic Hamburger IND-2/B4 262-8261 | Fri Aug 28 1987 10:31 | 61 |
|
> Thanks for the info! Any additional insights would be appreciated.
> Maybe I'm way off base here, but I was going to clapboard an *inside*
> room.
Ok, that is what I read between the lines of your initial request, but I
just had not ever seen it done or thought about clapboarding an inside
room. So, here are my comments now that I understand the game plan.
First, I would have reservations about doing it because of the fine
splinters in the clapboards. You can buy them smooth, or use the "aye"
grade, whatever the heck that is, with the smooth side out, but be careful
that all the edges are smooth. I can't say the SL stuff was smooth enough
for that kind of application, even on the smooth side. the edges were still
splintery. These splinters are painful and hard to get out because the wood
is fine and soft once under your skin. (Maybe I just have baby smooth
skin?)
General comments on hanging the stuff on any wall, inside or out.
1. cut your angles first, then square your other end and hang that board
first. I have a gambrel house and had lots of angles on the ends to cut
first.
2. Assume the ends of the boards are not square. they are not and you will
end up squareing each one. I used a fine backsaw and a benchook setup to do
it, rather than a circular saw. (Glutton for punishment. but I didn't want
to drag the table saw out of cellar to garage. Small 8" portable may help
with this if you havea fine tooth blade.)
3. if you are working by yourself, start from top edge and work down.
Totally backwards from conventional thinking but you use the top board as a
full length clamp to hold your next board in place. You can then adjust the
exposure of the board to match the rest, level it, and nail at your
leisure. Otherwise, assume 3-4 hands on two ladders to hang anything over
6-8' lengths.
4. use a bench knife for marking your cuts. much finer line and you can get
a better fit.
5. cut your board about 1/32" longer than you need and press fit it for a
really tight fit. (sounds good in theory, I had a heck of a time getting it
right!)
6. You will make an average of three trips up/down the ladder for each
board hung. thats the bad news...... the good news is, you will never again
be bothered by ladder work because you will get so used to it! 8^)
7. get a set of ladder extenders for the top of your ladder. these are the
things that area giant U for the top that extend the width of the resting
points to 4' instead of 18". They REALLY give you a steady ladder and make
things work easier. Also excellent for painting, working on gutters,
anywhere that your ladder is unsteady. (mine is unsteady everywhere except
laying on its side in the garage...)
That is about all I have for pearls of wisdom. If I think of any more I
will pass them on.
Good luck.
Vic H
|
114.191 | | BPOV09::RATTEY | | Tue Sep 01 1987 09:51 | 20 |
|
1) a question for the author of .6 - who has done all interrior
with ceder rather than sheetrock-
The cost. How did it compare to what it would have cost using
sheetrock? ( sheetrock, tape, joint compound, paint..etc.)
Was it still nessesary to put up moldings ?
2) Could somebody give me there opinions of the different grades
of exterior red cedar clapboards.
Should I spend the extra money on grade A or would I be wiser
to buy the lower grades and cut out the nots and imperfections?
|
114.192 | Info on cedar interiors | STAR::SWIST | Jim Swist ZKO1-1/D42 381-1264 | Tue Sep 01 1987 10:12 | 0 |
114.575 | advise needed - red cedar sidding | BPOV09::RATTEY | | Tue Sep 08 1987 11:31 | 21 |
|
-< Grade A vrs. grade C >-
I will soon be installing red cedar clapboard sidding on
my house and would like some advise on how to select the sidding.
I've been told that there are differant grades of sidding
(A,B,C) which also reflects the price paid for it.
Is it reccommended to go with the best grade or should I go with
a lesser grade and cut out the imperfections?
Would a installing a lesser grade effect the end results?
Any advise?
|
114.576 | Cedar Siding | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Tue Sep 08 1987 11:43 | 9 |
| Will you be applying it rough side out? If so you can use the B
or C grade. Siding is graded on the smooth side. They don't look at
the rough side at all to grade it.
B grade has some, but very few knots. With B grad, it's possible to
cut out the knots with very little wasted wood. A grade has very few
imperfections on the smooth side. If you're going to apply it smooth
side out, but stain it dark, you still don't need grade A. The dark
stain would hide the imperfections anyway.
|
114.577 | vertical vs. horizontal? | YODA::BARANSKI | If I were a realist, I'd be dead. | Tue Sep 08 1987 12:45 | 4 |
| With siding in general, what are the advantages and disadvantages of vertical
vs. horizontal siding?
Jim.
|
114.578 | horizontal is easier | JENEVR::GRISE | Tony Grise | Tue Sep 08 1987 14:08 | 11 |
|
re .2
Horizontal siding is easier to install. You can use clap board
and work your way up the side of the house. Vertical siding
usually requires using a V-groove siding which is more $$,
it is also harder to install because you cannot work your
way evenly up the side of the house.
Tony/
|
114.579 | | BPOV09::RATTEY | | Tue Sep 08 1987 14:15 | 46 |
|
re .1
Yes I will be applying the rough side out. The stain I intend on using
is a clear stain/preserve.
So I guess the Grade B might be my best bet. You think Grade C may
have too much waste?
re .2
< With siding in general, what are the advantages and disadvantages of >
vertical vs. horizontal siding? >
I have ship lap pine siding(vertical) on my present home, I'm
building an addition which will be done in red cedar clapboards. Eventually
I will be replacing the ship lap with cedar. The pine looks good but my
personal preference is for the cedar.
If you intend to install pine siding I would suggest that you shellac
all the knots before applying your finish.
This appearently wasn't done on my house and after a year or two the knots
blead through the stain.
By vertical siding I assume you mean pine, either ship lap or
pine boards with bats, and horizontal being cedar ?
Vertical (pine)
- cheaper,
- easier to install, seeing these are generally wider
than the cedar installation should be easier and take less
time.
Horozontial (cedar)
- life expectantcy is probably longer than pine
- increased resale value of home
Appearence of the two is a consideration. the vertical sidding may
look great on a contemporary home but may not do justice to an older
colonial home. I guess it's just a mater of personal preference.
|
114.580 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Tue Sep 08 1987 14:16 | 8 |
| Re: .2
In general, I'd say horizontal is more weatherproof. Because of
the overlap, water has to run UP to get in. With vertical siding,
the water only has to run sideways to get in a joint, which it can
do if there is a strong wind.
From an aesthetic standpoint, I think vertical siding looks terrible
compared to horizontal clapboards, but that's purely personal opinion.
|
114.581 | Horizontal forever | NISYSG::MOCCIA | | Tue Sep 08 1987 16:30 | 8 |
| Our last home had shiplap vertical siding, our new one has clapboards.
The only "advantage" to vertical is that is cheaper. Besides being
less resistant to wind and rain, it warps along the vertical axis
and exposes the underlayer of [whatever]. It also serves as an
interstate highway for ants and all other forms of vermin.
pbm
|
114.582 | Red cedar & clear coat don't go together | CASSAN::JOHNSON | Peter c/o Marlboro Computer Co. | Wed Sep 09 1987 10:39 | 11 |
| re: 4
DO NOT USE A CLEAR PRESERVATIVE for red cedar. Red cedar "bleeds" and with
a clear preservative you will get ulgy red blotches. If you want to use
red cedar you must use at least a semi-transparent stain to cover the bleeding
which will occur.
White cedar does not bleed and therefore can be stained with just a preservative
to maintain that natural wood texture and color.
-peter
|
114.205 | Why not oil red cedar siding? | BPOV09::JMICHAUD | Think about software that thinks! | Wed Sep 16 1987 14:14 | 10 |
|
With all the talk about finishes over western red cedar siding,
not once was linseed oiled mentioned. Is there a problem with
oil on cedar? I think it darkens the wood a bit, but the
results I imagine would be more consistent in color. I know
of a house which has been done in oil (not red cedar, but dark
brown in color shakes) and it always comes out great. Anyone
out there oil their cedar siding?
John//
|
114.209 | Source for 10" clapboards? | VICKI::ESONIS | What now? | Sun Sep 20 1987 08:58 | 18 |
| Does anyone know where I could find some 10" pine clapboards?
I'll be removing a door, replacing it with a window, and i'll need
a small quantity to patch the siding. pine would be acceptable,
I'd think, since it will be covered with solid stain.
The only thing I've been able to find locally (Concord, N.H.) is
redwood,at 1.62 per linear foot, which is much too expensive for
me. According to the guy who owns the place across the street from
me which manufactures clapboards, the damand for this size is so
small, it isn't worth it for him to mill them. Apparently everyone
else thinks this way also, since a local contractor i spoke with
said he and his customer called every place within a 40 mile radius
of concord without success when faced with the same problem.
Any pointer towards a source would be appreciated.
Steve.
|
114.214 | Cypress wood siding | AKA::SUNG | In search of a personal name | Mon Sep 21 1987 11:33 | 12 |
| I was just looking at a new house and the spec sheet said it
had Cypress siding rather than Cedar (or Fir). I asked the builder
why and he said recently it has been very difficult to get Cedar
or that it was extremely expensively as of late.
He said Cypress is comparable to Cedar but probably not as good.
I've seen Cypress used in the south alot but never around here (New
England).
Anyone ever heard of it? How well would it hold up in New England?
-al
|
114.215 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Mon Sep 21 1987 13:33 | 2 |
| I've heard they use cypress for greenhouses, and that it's very
rot-resistant. Otherwise, I don't know much about it.
|
114.216 | | EXODUS::MOLLICA | | Mon Sep 21 1987 13:43 | 7 |
| You were informed correctly.....
Cedar comes mostly from Canada...I hear...and strikes within the
past year or two have driven its price up or in some cases made
cedar unavailable. Cypress is a close substitute.
john mollica
|
114.217 | I thought cypress was really hard to find | STAR::SWIST | Jim Swist ZKO1-1/D42 381-1264 | Mon Sep 21 1987 16:55 | 5 |
| Lots of old houses used cypress for ground-contact purposes in the
years before pressure-treated lumber. It is also used for framing
in some old places - I believe it is much stronger than cedar (which
isn't particularly relevant for siding purposes).
|
114.218 | | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | the Gort | Tue Sep 22 1987 00:16 | 6 |
| Cypress is also harder than cedar which should make it more durable.
It is used alot where resistance to rot is required and I seem to
remember it is more rot resistant than redwood.
-j
|
114.206 | Why Not?? | AKOV01::WEISS | | Tue Sep 22 1987 17:20 | 11 |
| The previous owner of my house soaked all the red cedar shingles
in Cuprinol for 24 hours before installing them and, other then
darkening somewhat, have remained in excellent condition. This
was done about 7-8 years ago. Any inconsistency in color is due
to exposure; that is, the west side of my house is lighter than
the north side.
I think oiling is great - no painting!!!
Sue
|
114.207 | | RGB::MCGRATH | | Fri Sep 25 1987 14:15 | 14 |
|
Don't use straight linseed oil.
A neighbor of mine did this once. It looked absolutely beautiful
for about a year or two-then the mildew came and came and came.
They had someone come out and bleach off the mildew with some
success and then re-"oiled" it with Cuprinol or some such.
If you're going to use linseed oil then add a mildewcide to it
(available in your better paint stores). Simpler is to use
Cuprinol or the like which is a mixture of oils and has mildewcide
already in it.
|
114.210 | Try Hirsch lunber | CNTROL::DFORTUNE | | Mon Sep 28 1987 12:49 | 4 |
| Try Hirsch Lunber Townsend Ma. They carry alot of odd pine stuff.
Good luck
|
114.219 | good for underwater homes, as well? | Q::ROSENBAUM | Rich Rosenbaum;mail->Boehm::Rosenbaum | Tue Sep 29 1987 22:15 | 6 |
| I have also heard that cypress ia hard to find - at least old cypress.
I read an article a while back that said that people were dredging
up (large) old cypress trees from swamps in the south and selling
the wood for big bucks. Talk about rot resistance.
Rich
|
114.220 | there is "lots" of it in Fla. | WFOVX3::KOEHLER | Nobody knows I was there | Wed Sep 30 1987 08:27 | 11 |
| My brother built his A frame using cypress. He lives in Fla. and
bought cypress that was growing in a swamp. He and his sons cut the
wood from the swamp. (nice to have the equipment) After the wood
was dried (well sort of) they cut and milled it to spec. and built
the house. I was told that it should not rot for several generations.
Now if I could only get him to bring a few loads up North, I'll use
our shingle machine and make a bundle (pardon the pun).
Jim who's jealous of his 29' ceiling and 85'porch/w
hot tub.
|
114.211 | You've got to be kidding!!! | MKFSA::STEVENS | | Fri Oct 02 1987 22:00 | 17 |
|
Who ever heard of anyone replacing a door with a window? Don't
you think it's going to be a wee bit harder getting in and out
of the house? Well, if you insist on making all this extra work
for yourself, then I'd like to suggest going to SPAGS. That's
right, Spags, they have enormous shutters that will cover any
inperfections you may inflict upon your home. They also sell
exterior spackle in 50 gallon drums so you can form your own
clapboards of any size.
On a more serious note... Have you checked into pressboard clapboards?
I'm not sure about the availability but they would definately be
cheaper.
Good Luck Hoser,
Dave
|
114.212 | un-real | VICKI::ESONIS | What now? | Mon Oct 05 1987 08:24 | 25 |
|
> Who ever heard of anyone replacing a door with a window? Don't
> you think it's going to be a wee bit harder getting in and out
> of the house?
Who said we wanted to get out of the house?
> On a more serious note...
uhuh...
> Have you checked into pressboard clapboards?
shortly after i entered this not, i discovered that i can purchase
12" masonite clapboards at a place in manchester... since i have
solid color stain on the outside of the house, this will probably
look ok, but i still "shutter" at the thought of not using real
wood. ( insert smiley face here )
|
114.213 | Paper-mach� siding - YUK! | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Mon Oct 05 1987 12:27 | 19 |
| > > Have you checked into pressboard clapboards?
>
>
> shortly after i entered this not, i discovered that i can purchase
> 12" masonite clapboards at a place in manchester... since i have
> solid color stain on the outside of the house, this will probably
> look ok, but i still "shutter" at the thought of not using real
> wood. ( insert smiley face here )
DON'T BUY PRESSBOARD CLAPBOARDS. You'd do almost as well to side your house
with cardboard refridgerator cartons. My parent's had a house built 8 years
ago with that siding, and they've already had to replace several sections, and
the rest of it needs replacing.
If you're REAL lucky, the stuff might last 15 years. Spend the money to buy
some real wood siding, even pine clapboards are vastly superior to the
pressboard junk.
Paul
|
114.221 | Cleaning Egg off of Cedar Shakes | VIA::ASCHNEIDER | Andy Schneider - DTN 381-2475 | Wed Nov 11 1987 09:23 | 26 |
| I looked thru 1111.* to find a similar topic, but there wasn't an
obvious one. Since possible answers to my question may be helpful to
others out there, I thought I'd post the question here....
Last night, my wife heard a couple of loud BANGs outside the house.
I looked but couldn't find anything in the dark, so I went to bed.
This morning, I went outside to clear the snow out of the driveway
and I saw what made the noise. Some of the find juveniles in our
town tossed a couple of eggs against the side of the house (and
I thought halloween was a couple of weeks ago).
Anyhow, I need to get the egg junk off of the house. of course,
it had already dried on the house by the time I got to it. The
siding is made up of very rough-surfaced cedar shakes. They have
a layer of semi-transparent stain on them which was applied by a
sprayer (i.e. not absorbed too deeply into the shake). Any ideas
on how to get the egg stuff off without rubbing the shakes down
so a lot of the stain goes away with it? Anyone used a method
of spraying them off without rubbing?? I had thought about just
going up there and trying some things myself, but if I can find
a couple of ideas to try before making any "grave" cosmetic mistakes
to the house, I'd rather do that.
Thanks for any help you could offer
andy
|
114.222 | Whatever you do, do it quick! | WELFAR::PGRANSEWICZ | Auhhhhh, I've been slimed! | Wed Nov 11 1987 12:20 | 10 |
| Hi Andy!
Time is of the essence here! I would not let that stuff sit on
the shingles 1 second longer than necessary. Hopefully its frozen
on there right now and not soaked in. I would suggest a bucket
of hot water, TSP (Tri-sodium Phosphate), rubber gloves and a stiff
bristle hand brush. Try to test it on an inconspicuous place first
if possible. I don't think just hosing it down will get it off.
Phil
|
114.193 | a thanks, and a couple more tips | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Thu Nov 12 1987 15:06 | 18 |
| I just felt I had to reply to this one. I have to thank VIC for his tip on
going from the top to the bottom. Makes it a piece of cake. One other tip I
have (which I devised by experimentation), is if you're siding up against a
sloping roof you have to measure each board, right? Wrong! All you have to do
is cut the first board and then use the bottom of it to define the top of the
exposed part of the next board. All this assumes you're going from top down.
One idea I came up with is to snap a line over each stud. Then when you nail up
the clapboards you can use the line to line up your nails. The reason you can
use the nailheads in the sheathing is that I'm assuming its covered with Tyvek
or some such stuff.
-mark
btw - now I know why builders use clapboards. they've got to be about the
easiest thing there is. when I shingled my last house it took many
hours to do the smallest of sections. I sided a section around 10X15
in a couple of hours.
|
114.194 | Tops - Down | USMRM1::GFALVELLA | | Thu Dec 03 1987 10:35 | 7 |
| Vic or Mark, I'm very interested in the TOPS-DOWN method as I envision
doing my siding job alone. When you nail your first board down
is it left with enough flexibility to slide the next board underneath,
or do you hold back on the hammering until the second board is in
place?
Any other info would also be appreciated.
|
114.195 | | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Fri Dec 04 1987 08:17 | 15 |
| I simply threw a couple of nails in the first one to keep it from sliding. When
the next one goes in, you nail the bottom of the top one. This in turn snugs up
the second one. It's tight, but not too tight to slide the third one in.
One thing I discovered after awhile (and I'm surprized I didin't think otf it
right away) is it's not enough to maintain equal spacing between each board
since even a slight error magnifies itself as you move down (or even up) the
wall. Therefore, I will fairly frequently use a level and/or measure the new
board to a fixed reference point.
One potential MAJOR negative doing it this way is that if you screw up a board,
it's extremely difficult to remove since there is a good board nailed to it. So
far I haven't had to deal with this and I hope I never do...
-mark
|
114.208 | Beauty is in the eye of the homeowner | CADSE::BAUGHMAN | | Fri Dec 04 1987 10:06 | 11 |
| One consideration with red cedar is the way it looks. It tends
to become very streaky and splotchy. Some people hate it, others
don't mind. My house was in this state between being sandblasted
and stained, and I didn't think it looked too bad, but it was a
little informal for a colonial. I know this was discussed early in
this conference; you can locate the earlier discussions by checking
note 1111, which groups notes by keywords, in this case probably
SIDING. The oil might darken the shingles, but it might darken
the dark and light streaks the same amount, so the contrast would
stay the same - just as streaky.
|
114.223 | Sandblasting paint from shingles | JOKUR::IRELAND | | Tue Apr 19 1988 13:47 | 3 |
| Has anyone had experience with sandblasting to remove paint from
shingles? Do they look like new when you are done or do they need
to be stained or painted?
|
114.224 | Another person with peeling paint wants info | PALMER::PALMER | half a bubble off plumb | Wed Apr 20 1988 10:01 | 4 |
| Karen,
Would you mind posting how much the estimate was and the size
of the job?
=Ralph=
|
114.225 | Ditto | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Wed Apr 20 1988 10:37 | 7 |
|
Yes, and could you tell us what you learned about the
"walnut" and water-blasting methods?
-tm
|
114.226 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Wed Apr 20 1988 10:39 | 9 |
| Sandblasting shingles will probably make the grain more pronounced.
Since shingles already have somewhat of a grain texture anyway,
my guess is that the appearance will be acceptable, probably an
exaggeration of what you already have. You'll definitely want
to stain or paint them, just as you'd want to stain or paint new
shingles or any other wood exposed to the weather.
I had good luck with BC Industries in Worcester, Mass. for sandblasting
a couple of radiators. I don't know if they do houses or not.
|
114.227 | Masonite/press board siding problems | RANGLY::OSULLIVAN_KE | | Thu Apr 21 1988 19:42 | 10 |
|
The siding on my 13 year-old house is a Monsanto product called
"Colorlok" (that's what's printed on the back side). It's now
a pretty faded yellow, and looks to be in need of painting.
A paint store salesman recognized it, called it "masonite," said it
was used extensively 10-15 years ago, and said it could be painted
successfully using any "good quality flat latex." Any opinions
or experiences out there?
Thanks.
|
114.228 | Was nice when new (cheap) | AKOV68::CRAMER | | Fri Apr 22 1988 15:31 | 7 |
| I was a carpenter 10-15 years ago and saw a fair amount of that
stuff being put on. It looks like clapboards when up, and painted
very nicely. My only reservation was its durability, cause your
paint store salesman is right, it is masonite (or very similar)
and I wondered what prolonged dampness would do to it.
Alan
|
114.229 | Masonite | MCIS2::CHIN | | Fri Apr 22 1988 16:54 | 8 |
| We have masonite on our 14 year old house. The north side of the
house is in good condition. The other sides are not doing well.
Every place where there is a nail holding the masonite boards on,
water has gotten in and swelled the board. In some spots the boards
are disintegrating. The person who owned the house before us caulked
all the nails to prolong the life of the masonite. We are vinyl
siding the house this summer. We do not think much of masonite.
|
114.230 | What's "Abitibi"? | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | | Fri Apr 22 1988 17:04 | 5 |
| Is this just a past incarnation of "Abitibi" which is in current
vogue? Anybody know about the durability of this stuff? (Guess
why I am concerned.)
Stan
|
114.231 | Abitibi does not hold up. | FREDW::MATTHES | | Sat Apr 23 1988 10:22 | 3 |
| We have Abitibi in our bath. We are about to replace it.
It does not hold up well in moisture areas.
It's probably abpout 10 years old and is now disintegrating.
|
114.232 | Abitibi answers | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | | Mon Apr 25 1988 09:43 | 9 |
| I answered my own question this weekend. I was talking to an
ex-painting contractor. He said that Abitibi is a masonite product.
The manufacturer recommends that one coat of oil base paint be used
on the material before latex paint is applied to seal the nail holes.
If this isn't done, the material will expand where the nails go
through due to water degrading the material. Oh well. Time to
consider suing the builder again for another reason.
Stan
|
114.233 | "Insulite" | FSLENG::LEVESQUE | SET/HINDSIGHT = 20/20 | Mon Apr 25 1988 12:16 | 25 |
| RE: Masonite
We have a similar siding on our house called "Insulite". We have
noticed the "nail-hole" problem described in another note. Since
my neighbor is the person who helped build our house, the contractor
has become more experienced in dealing with this product. We built
a detached garage 3 years ago and used the same siding.
The key is to not drive the nail head flush with the siding. The
natural "weathering" of the product will eventually result in a
better finished appearance. The flush nail heads also made for
dimples in the siding. Not a big deal when new, but the water does
find its way in there. The garage looks much better, and the nails
do not protrude to the point that they are noticeable.
We just brush painted the house & garage last fall with California
latex, and it looks good. So we initially had almost 8 years with
the original paint (which was sprayed on). I don't consider that
too bad.
In another 5-6 years, it might be a good idea to replace the siding.
The garage won't need it then, but everything should be done at
the same time.
Ted
|
114.95 | What does old oil/latex look like? | YODA::MEIER | Steve Meier | Fri Jun 03 1988 11:36 | 11 |
| I have a related painting question. If you can not paint oil over latex
or vice versa, how do you tell what you've got? I recently purchased
a home, and the shed out back was peeling (I presemue due to age) badly.
So far, I have scraped the worst side leaving about half of the wood
exposed. How do I determine what type the existing paint was, and in
either case, what should I do? One more broad and ignorant question:
What are the pro's and con's of latex vs. oil.
Thanks,
Steve
|
114.96 | re .8 ("how do I determine what kind of paint I've got") | LITLTN::CAHILL | Jim Cahill | Fri Jun 03 1988 13:48 | 13 |
| <<< JOET::DUA1:[000000.NOTES$LIBRARY]HOME_WORK.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Better living through DIY >-
================================================================================
Note 1225.8 ?? oil |/_ latex 8 of 8
SONATA::HERCHEK 5 lines 5-AUG-1987 12:17
-< tip on testing oil/latex >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A quick tip in testing for oil or latex. Take a cotton swab and
dip it in alcohol. Rub against paint. If the paint comes off you
have latex paint otherwise you have oil.
Gary
|
114.23 | replacing single shakes | HYDRA::JACOBS | Live Free and Prosper | Mon Jun 06 1988 09:59 | 12 |
| I need to replace a few rotted shakes around my front porch. Is
there a preferred method of removing the old ones, and nailing in
new ones so that the nails won't show? I imagine that the nails
from several courses will be in the way when trying to shove a new
shake into the slot left when the old shake was removed. It seems
like it would be extremely difficult to replace a single shake without
hacking it to bits, but I've seen houses where miscellaneous shakes
have been replaced. What's the trick?
Adv(thanks)ance;
Steve
|
114.24 | There's a special tool for doing that | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Mon Jun 06 1988 11:19 | 22 |
| There's a special tool for removing nails from under shingles or shakes. It
looks like this:
From the side: Detail of top (from the front):
|<-----2"------>|
_ _________________
^ | | |
| | | |
| | | /| |\ |
18" | |/ | | \|
| | / \
| __| / \
v | / \
_ | | |
You pound or push the tool up under the shakes, and hook a nail using the hooks
on the end of the bar. Then you pound down on the flat part next to the handle
to pull the nail out from underneath. You might be able to rent them, but if
you live near Nashua, I saw them in JR's discount the other day, and I imagine
they're under $20.
Paul
|
114.25 | Special tool -- $10-15 | AMUSE::QUIMBY | | Mon Jun 06 1988 11:23 | 12 |
| You can get a tool (Brookstone, full-range hardware stores) that
slides up under a shake or shingle, catches around a nail, and
(theoretically) allows you to cut the nail by whacking the free
and with a hammer. In practice, it doesn't work that neatly for
me (end up pulling out doubled-over nails instead) but it does
work. You can then cut a new shake/single to size and insert it.
You won't be able to invisibly nail the replacement (at least,
I don't know how!), so nail neatly and use HD galvanized shingle/
shake nails or possibly aluminum nails to avoid rust tracks.
dq
|
114.26 | Hidden nails | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Mon Jun 06 1988 11:50 | 17 |
| re .22
You won't be able to invisibly nail the replacement (at least,
I don't know how!), so nail neatly and use HD galvanized shingle/
shake nails or possibly aluminum nails to avoid rust tracks.
I read a book this weekend that gave a way to hide the nailheads -
I've no idea if it really works, as I've never done anything like this.
What they said to do was to insert the shake 1/4" farther out than the
other shakes, then nail them in just under the edge of the next higher
course. Finally, use a rubber mallet to pound the replacement shake in
until it lines up, and the nailhead disappears under the course above.
It'd be interesting to know if this really works.
Larry
|
114.27 | | SEINE::CE_JOHNSON | Stand fast in liberty. | Mon Jun 06 1988 12:41 | 7 |
| RE: .23
Yup. I've used this method very successfully many times. The smaller
galvanized nail bend quite nicely up under the next course, never
to be seen again. ;)
Charlie
|
114.245 | Clean clapboards before painting? | KYOA::YATES | | Thu Jun 23 1988 18:29 | 20 |
|
Hi
The wooden part of my house needs to be painted pretty
bad, so I'm finally getting around to it.
Scraping the pealing paint is no problem (except that
its a pain).
My question is - The clapboards are pretty dirty - they
havent been painted in what looks like 10 years. I tryed
scrubbing them with little success and lots of work.
Do I need to clean them (its really just MANY layers of
dust), or will paint seal the dirt in?
Thanks in advance?
tom
|
114.246 | Clapboard washing | CHOVAX::GILSON | | Fri Jun 24 1988 17:36 | 6 |
| If you clean them first, you will get a smoother paint job. The
high-pressure hoses sold at most hardware/DIY stores did a sufficient
job for us. We did this after scraping to blow away all the little
particles scraping leaves behind. Because we made an effort not
to soak the wood, just clean it of debris, we were able to prime
the bare spots the same day.
|
114.247 | TSP (not TCP) | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Mon Jun 27 1988 23:35 | 7 |
| discussed elsewhere for mildew, a mixture of TCP and bleach (or TCP alone if
there's no mildew) will produce the cleanest surface.
you can certainly paint directly over dirt, but I wouldn't take bets as to
when it will start to peal.
-mark
|
114.248 | Peal/Peel Nit | NAC::HUGHES | TANSTAAFL | Sat Jul 02 1988 01:38 | 7 |
| Ask not for whom the bell tolls, it peals for you! I on the other
hand intend to sit on my front stoop, amidst the apple peels and
watch my paint peel.
Sorry, I tried but I couldn't help myself.
Mike H
|
114.255 | Size of edging boards for 6" clapboards | CSMADM::SCHWABE | | Wed Aug 03 1988 12:15 | 6 |
| I am getting ready to install 6" cedar siding on my house and am
wondering how thick (1x?, or 5/4x?) the vertical boards at the
corners of the house should be.
Anybody have any thoughts on the subject?
DS
|
114.256 | 5/4 | PAMOLA::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Wed Aug 03 1988 13:02 | 14 |
| If we ever get around to it, the guy who's going to frame our house says
he has a special interest in "authentic" capes and other styles of 100 years
or so ago. He says it's gotta be 5/4. Not sure about the other dimension tho.
Even if authenticity isn't an issue, I'd think it would look better anyway,
extending past the fattest part of the siding, as in this side view:
5/4 1x
| / | | / |
| / | |/ |
| /___| /___|
| / | | / |
| / | |/ |
| /___| /___|
|
114.257 | Are you sure? | STAR::SWIST | Jim Swist ZKO3-4/U14 381-1264 | Wed Aug 03 1988 14:12 | 12 |
| Re: .-1
The 6" clapboards I've installed are more like 1/2" nominal thickness
at the thick end. So the edges will not project past 1x corner
boards either, or am I missing something?
Assuming you want #1 lumber, you'll find 5/4x4 or 5/4x6 to be VERY
expensive (much more so than the simple proportional board-ft
increment).
Perhaps the guy with the interest in "authentic" capes is also talking
about clapboards that aren't paper-thin like they are today.
|
114.258 | related questions | CSMADM::SCHWABE | | Wed Aug 03 1988 14:32 | 31 |
|
A related question:
Some people recommend staining both sides of the cedar siding. What
would be the reason for this? I'd rather not double the work if
I don't have to.
When nailing cedar siding on I was told only to nail through one
piece and not through 2 layers of siding where they overlap. What
is the reason for this? See picture below:
_ |
put nail here| / /|
V / / |
|----/ /_ |
|----/_// /|
^ / / |
| / / |
| /_/
not here
Is there 5/4 inch wide red cedar available?
Reply to .2
Remember, the 1/2" siding will sit on top of the piece below it
adding to the total thickness. And a 1 x whatever edging board
has a finished thickness of 3/4". It might not overlap as in .1
but it will be pretty close. I think I would prefer the 5/4" look.
DS
|
114.259 | Trim Stock for Clapboards | OBLIO::MILLER | | Wed Aug 03 1988 15:05 | 17 |
| I am in the planning process to do that you describe.
The reason for the stain on both sides is to minimize cupping.
It is called out by some DYI books but not by the Western Red Cedar
association. I have the US and Canadian standards if you would
like to view them (location BXB).
I plan to use 5/4 stock and am in the process of ordering from the
west coast. The firm is Bear Creek Lumber Winthrop WA. Price $1.50
per Board foot. There is no reason you can not use 1 inch stock
as the trim can be shimmed out from the sheathing. I would use
2 inch stock if I had to do it again but on the current project
I do not have the space.
The nail pattern is used to avoid splitting of the clapboards in
dry weather. This pattern is also called out in the Western Red
Cedar association Standard.
|
114.260 | | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Wed Aug 03 1988 17:46 | 4 |
|
I used 1x stock on my house and the clapboards do not go
beyond the stock. They are close to even but probably
about 1/16 to 1/8 below.
|
114.261 | | CURIE::BBARRY | | Thu Aug 04 1988 14:46 | 20 |
| For depth I would recommend testing for yourself. Get a few shingles
and lay them on a flat surface with the correct exposure next to a
1x and see if the points stickout. If they do use a 5/4x. The depth
of the shingles will be dependent on the exposure.
The width of the corner boards depends on the height of the house
and the period that you are trying to emulate. Nominal 6", which
has a finished width of 5 3/8", boards will work on most applications.
For three story and tall two story wider boards seem to be the
preference, but they tend to warp more. Colonial Period houses seem
to have narrower corner boards, but also do not use contrasting trim
paint. The best thing to do is find an old house similar to yours
that you like the corner boards on and measure them.
The reason a nominal 6" board will be 5 3/8" not 5 1/2" is that the
corners should be resquared on a disk sander or planer by knocking 1/16"
off each edge to correct for rounding in the manufacturing and
shipping process.
Brian
|
114.262 | | SMURF::HODGES | | Fri Aug 05 1988 16:36 | 8 |
| I used 5/4 on my house (just nearing completion in New Boston NH.
You are welcome to come and have a look. Since john (smurf::wallace)
is just down the road in Weare, maybe you could arrange for an
afternoon of house-seeing in NH and after looking at 4/5 and 1",
decide for yourself!
- rick
|
114.263 | | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Wed Aug 17 1988 13:40 | 17 |
| re: only nailing through 1 board
I don't see how this is possible. Even if you expose 4-1/2" (which I think is
too much), you'd have to drive your nail over 1" from the bottom. I would
expect this to result in more cupping.
re: 5/4
I too have found that 4/4 does an adequate job. Oddly enough, I had a spot
where I had to do some strange shimming and wound up building one side out of
a 2/4 nailed on top of a 4/4 and when I put in the clapboards, they indeed
looked nicer. However, with most things, it's only YOU who ever really notices.
btw - remember to install your clapboards from the top down (discussed
elsewhere). This will dramatically reduce installation time.
-mark
|
114.271 | Install clapboards rough side out, or buy rough clapboards? | CSMADM::SCHWABE | | Mon Oct 03 1988 21:00 | 16 |
|
I recently purchased 6" cedar siding for my house. Initially we
wanted smooth siding (this is what we purchased), but after looking
at a few homes, have decided to go with a rougher surface.
The smooth siding purchased could probably be just turned around
so the rough side faces out, but it is obvious from the taper on
the clapboard that the smmoth side was meant to face out.
I heard that this is what you would do to get a rougher surface
(just turn the clapboard around). This doesn't seem right. before
I waste my money and time installing smooth cedar siding backwards,
are there different grades of cedar siding available? If there is
would anyone know the approximate price differences?
DS
|
114.272 | both sides should be usable | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Mon Oct 03 1988 21:58 | 6 |
| I have never heard of what you described. I just put up some clapboards rough
side out to match the rest of the house. It really felt like a crime since the
smooth side was so nice. I can't imagine what you saw to make you think only
one side was usable.
-mark
|
114.273 | | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Wed Oct 05 1988 10:38 | 19 |
|
I have seen it. My first batch of cedar siding was usable on
both sides, but of course the smooth side is the *only* way to go.
:-) :-)
I had to buy another 200 lineal feet to finish the house though,
and the second batch I got was from a different company. This batch
was cut sort of tapered from front to back (smooth to rough) at
the thick end. I don't think it would have looked very good if
it had been used rough side out since the taper would look like
it was going the wrong way.
Cedar siding does come in different roughnesses, and I believe
the smoothest is referred to as "vertical grain". Prices vary at
around a nickel per lineal foot between them. Have you looked
into redwood siding? The stuff I looked at was rougher than
cedar, about the same color (maybe a little redder), and had a
pre-made rabbitt that allowed easy and consitent gauging. It
was real nice looking siding, it may be what your looking for.
|
114.274 | Rough side for staining | 3D::BLAKE | | Wed Oct 05 1988 22:58 | 3 |
| I used the rough side for staining and the smooth side for painting.
The stain didn't take well to the smooth side. Mine were pine
clapboards but that shouldn't matter.
|
114.275 | Cedar siding | 56738::FINGERHUT | | Thu Oct 06 1988 10:08 | 6 |
| Cedar siding is graded by the smooth side. They don't look at the
rough side. If there are any visible knots on the smooth side, it's
B grade.
If you plan to use the rough side out, you probably should get B
grade.
|
114.276 | Look at the way it's packed | SAGE::DERAMO | | Thu Oct 06 1988 13:11 | 12 |
| When I bought some clapboard this summer, the lumberyard person
told me that the packages of clapboard are packed differently, based
on the side recommended for use. Clapboard intended for smooth side
use is packaged with the rough side exposed; clapboard intended
for rough side use is packaged with the smooth side exposed.
Bu the way, P.F. O'Connor in Revere and Wilmington (I think) MA has a sale
this week on clapboard. Western red cedar "aye and better" is $.38 per
lineal foot. I paid $.44 this past summer.
|
114.296 | Buying/measuring clapboards | JOKUR::MCCONNEY | I'm an M.D. = Music Director | Mon Nov 21 1988 13:14 | 8 |
| Regarding 1/2 X 6 clapboard siding; Does anyone know the formula
for converting square footage to linear feet? Building supply
stores sell/calculate it both ways. I could'nt find this under
any other previous note regarding siding.
Thanks,
Chip
|
114.297 | Cedar siding | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Mon Nov 21 1988 13:19 | 6 |
| > Regarding 1/2 X 6 clapboard siding; Does anyone know the formula
> for converting square footage to linear feet?
3 linear feet = 1 square foot.
|
114.298 | Figure this Out | JOKUR::MCCONNEY | I'm an M.D. = Music Director | Mon Nov 21 1988 13:37 | 8 |
| So, the same applies for calculating price? For example, if a store
quotes me .36 a linear foot, then essentially he's selling it to
me for 1.08 a square foot (3 X .36)? Someone told me the formula
for calculating price was:
linear foot price X 2.667 = sq footage price
What's 2.667???
|
114.299 | any answers to this one? | CSMADM::SCHWABE | | Mon Nov 21 1988 13:59 | 10 |
|
Based on the previous replies consider this:
I recently purchased 2200 sq ft of 1/2 x 6 siding for $.98 a sq
ft. What was delivered was 440 bundle ft (10 pieces per bundle)
for a total of 4400 linear ft.
Was I shortchanged? Should I have gotten 6600 linear ft of siding?
Don
|
114.300 | further explanation | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Mon Nov 21 1988 14:12 | 6 |
| When I said 3 linear feet = 1 square foot, I was talking about
coverage.
If a place sells it by the square foot, they're talking about 2
linear feet.
|
114.301 | Suppliers figure on 0% waste | SEESAW::PILANT | L. Mark Pilant | Mon Nov 21 1988 14:28 | 17 |
| I'll second .4. Many places which sell siding by the square foot
use the nominal dimensions instead of the actual dimensions when
calculating the coverage needed. (I.e., two 1 foot long 1x6 pieces
of limber will over 1 squate foot; with overlap, it is really three.)
I ran into this when I ordered the 1x6 T&G red cedar for my family
room.
Another thing to look out for. If you do wind up having to order
more siding, make sure what you get it from the same manufacturer.
The first lot of (1x6) T&G cedar I ordered had a 5" exposure, the
second lot has a 5-1/4" exposure. (By exposure I mean the visible
face of the wood, it does not include the tongue and groove.)
Nothing like stating the obvious, but maybe it'll help someone else
avoid this problem :-}
- Mark
|
114.302 | The only thing clear is my cedar | JOKUR::MCCONNEY | I'm an M.D. = Music Director | Mon Nov 21 1988 14:44 | 4 |
| Ok, .4 is all set. I'm still not clear on price.
Does anyone know how to convert price per linear foot to price per
square foot?
|
114.303 | | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Mon Nov 21 1988 14:55 | 10 |
| > Does anyone know how to convert price per linear foot to price per
> square foot?
How come you don't ask the store since there are several ways you
can calculate it?
If someone says that linear foot price x 2.667 = square foot price,
they're talking about coverage where 4�" of the siding shows.
2.667 x 4.5 = 12
|
114.304 | is this the formula? | CSMADM::SCHWABE | | Mon Nov 21 1988 14:57 | 9 |
|
I seem to recall that to convert sq footage of house surface area
to linear footage you do something like the following:
sq footage of area to be covered x 2.667 = linear footage
I'm not sure about the 2.667 (it was in an earlier reply)
Don
|
114.305 | No *ONE* formula! | MISFIT::DEEP | The moving hand NOTEs, then having nit... | Mon Nov 21 1988 15:39 | 24 |
|
There is no single formula that will convert square feet to linear feet,
since 1 square foot is, by definition, a unit of area that is 12" x 12"
square.
A linear foot is of unspecified width, and 12" in length.
Thus, if the material is 6" wide, 1 square ft = 2 linear ft
if the material is 12" wide, 1 square ft = 1 linear ft
if the material is 4" wide, 1 square ft = 3 linear ft, etc
Get the idea?
Now as for *coverage*, like .-2 says, it depends on how much of the width
actually contributes to coverage, and how much is lost to overlap, or
jointing.
Bottom line is that there can be many different formulas, and its best to
find out, up front, which one is in use, before buying.
Bob
|
114.306 | How to remove pieces of split siding? | LEDS::GRAY | | Mon Mar 13 1989 05:13 | 7 |
| What is the best technique for removing individual pieces of cedar
siding that have split? How do you get the nails out of the board
above without damaging it too?
I'm going to be repainting this Spring and a number of boards have
splait and I'd like to replace them. Are there special tools for
this sort of thing?
|
114.307 | Cut them, or carefully pry them | PAMOLA::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Mon Mar 13 1989 07:18 | 13 |
| Not that I've done it, but when I did a similar project, a book I read said:
Cut the nail with a hacksaw blade: slide it up between the good clapboard
and the split one, and cut the nail. (Sounds rather labor intensive to me.)
You may want to take the widest chisel you have (3/4" is probably good enough,
if that's all you have) and split the already-split one into enough pieces to
enable you to take it all down. This should give easier access to the good
board's nails.
I've successfully and _c_a_r_e_f_u_l_l_y pried up good boards just enough to
pull its nails out enough to get a hammer's prying-thingamajigs under the nail
head.
|
114.308 | Use a nail puller | MAKITA::MCCABE | | Wed Mar 15 1989 17:41 | 31 |
| There is a tool made for what you want to do. It is a long flat
bar with a T shaped head that has two slots to hook the nails
you push it up, slide it over the nail, and pull down. The handle
is offset, so you can hit it with a hammer. Spags has them.
Vt100 graphics to follow:
____________
| |
|/\-| |-/\|
| |
| | \-- Nails grabbed here
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|--| offset handle
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|__|
Chris
|
114.314 | Installing clapboards in gable-end fan design | JOKUR::MCCONNEY | I'm a M.D. = Music Director | Fri Mar 17 1989 10:29 | 27 |
| I searched for information regarding application of siding but didn't
find anything this specific:
I'm interested in applying clapboard to the peak area of the gable
end of my house using the "fan design". Actually, I'm not even sure
if it's clapboard being used. I examined a home in the neighborhood
that had this design and it didn't look like clapboard to me mainly
because the slabs of wood were butted against each other (not overlapping
like clapboard) and the wood didn't have the wedge appearance
(like clapboard).
The top window located near the peak of my roof has a half-round moon
on top of it. The bottom of the fan design will circle around this
half-moon.
I would like to know:
1. Is this clapboard, a kit, or just flat pieces of wood?
2. Does anyone have experience doing this? If so, any suggestions
would be greatly appreciated.
3. Are there any magazines or books that may help me with this
design?
Thank you,
Chip
|
114.315 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Fri Mar 17 1989 11:31 | 5 |
| I think there's an article within the past year on this in Fine Homebuilding.
I'll look for it, but I wouldn't count on me to remember to find it, if I were
you. Try a library.
Paul
|
114.316 | I just read about it last night | LEDS::MCGARRAH | DSSI - Catch the wave | Fri Mar 17 1989 13:06 | 5 |
| In the latest issue of Fine Homebuilding (February/March #51) someone
from Northborough, MA asked the same question. The question and its
corresponding answer are on page 14.
Pat
|
114.317 | Much Brighter Now | JOKUR::MCCONNEY | I'm a M.D. = Music Director | Mon Mar 20 1989 08:41 | 11 |
| The timing could not have been better!
I must say, Fine Homebuilding is very difficult to find in stores;
thank goodness for libraries. The first thing I learned about this
technique is the correct terminology for this design;
"Clapboard Sunburst" not "Fan" :-)
Thank you for pointing that article out!
Chip
|
114.318 | | CHART::CBUSKY | | Mon Mar 20 1989 09:08 | 8 |
| > I must say, Fine Homebuilding is very difficult to find in stores;
I seen both Fine Homebuilding and Fine Woodworking at "real" lumber
stores such as Coldwels in Berlin and Sterling/Lancaster lumber in
Sterling. Others may have them too, but those are the two stores that
I frequent.
Charly
|
114.319 | Under construction in W.Acton MA | SELECT::REINSCHMIDT | DLB12-2/D8, DTN 291-8114 | Mon Mar 20 1989 12:56 | 11 |
| I noticed just what you're describing currently being done in West
Acton MA. A new, small entrance to a cape is being added with a
sunburst above the door frame.
It's on the left of <Central Street?> as you are going south after
Idlewild Farms. Or on the right as you are going north in a group
of homes right after the West Acton Center nightmare intersection.
Looks nice. Hope you can do it too.
Marlene
|
114.320 | | JOKUR::MCCONNEY | I'm a M.D. = Music Director | Mon Mar 20 1989 13:50 | 13 |
| It is a very nice touch; I hope I can do it too!
The article was somewhat complicated but after reading it 20,000
times, I think I have it figured out. I liked the suggestion,
"draw the gable full scale somewhere else - on the floor of your barn,
perhaps - to work out the pattern." (the guy from Northboro, Ma. was
doing this on his barn) I think I'll go this route since It may be
easier than figuring it out while being 30 feet in the air.
Chip
|
114.328 | Clapboard over T1-11?? | LDYBUG::ARRAJ | | Mon Mar 20 1989 14:07 | 10 |
| I checked the topics out under the "Siding - Wood" heading and none
answered my question, which is:
Can you put clapboard over T1-11?
If so should there be anything (e.g. building paper) between the
T1-11 and the clapboard?
Thanks in advance,
Valerie
|
114.309 | clapboards or shingles? - they're both siding | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Tue Mar 21 1989 13:28 | 23 |
| Before correctly answering your question, I need to know what kind of siding
you have. Is it shingles or clapboard.
.-1 will certainly work on shingles (I know because I have one) but will not
work on clapboards.
The way I removed close to 1000 feet of siding was as follows
use a pry-bar (sometimes called a WonderBar) to do the lifting
BUT be sure to put it directly under the nail you want to remove and
tap it up against the nail to seat it. If you don't, you'll split the
siding when you try prying.
Remember you have 2 rows of nails holding one piece of siding.
As for the hack saw method, I've tried this and was unsuccessful. Remember that
a clapboard is nailed both on top and bottom and you simply can't get the hack
say up 6 inches or more to cut the upper nail (at least I couldn't).
If you need more clarity, feel free to give me a call or drop me some mail.
-mark
|
114.321 | I did it - sort of... | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Tue Mar 21 1989 19:29 | 8 |
| I never read the article but I did something like this. I put clapboards
around a round top horizontally. I assume the issue is cutting the ends to but
against the trim and not how to arrange the pattern.
I ending up making my own trip for the round top so I simply used the scrap
as a template to mark the clapboards - worked like a champ.
-mark
|
114.334 | Wood siding for log home? | POBOX::KOCH | No matter where you go, there you are. | Wed Mar 22 1989 16:04 | 6 |
| Anybody have any suggestions on re-siding a vertical log home with
vertical cedar siding? I assume some type of framework or furring
strips would have to be installed. I also want to add additional
insulation with a couple of inches of blue foamboard. Reason for
siding is water damage to logs from lack of guttering. I'll patch
where necessary and then re-side if possible. Help!
|
114.329 | I dont see any problems | OASS::B_RAMSEY | My hovercraft is filled with eels. | Wed Mar 22 1989 19:28 | 21 |
| Since no one else attempted...
There is no reason I can think of that you could not put clapboard
over T1-11. The T1-11 is providing any needed protection to the
existing house and the clapboards will protect the T1-11 and will
provide the look you no doubt want. It is an opportunity to put
some rigid foam insulation between the outside world and the inside
but will require that you use even longer nails.
I cant imagine why you would need anything between the T1-11 and
the clapboards. A vapor barrier would only serve to encourage rot
in the T1-11 since it will now contains moisture and will store that
moisture and rot. Building paper would reduce the squeaks if the
clapboard moved in relation to the T1-11 but I don't think that
would ever be a problem.
The only problem I can see is that you will have to buy longer nails
to go through the clapboard and the width of the T1-11 will make
the clapboard and trim standout a little from about windows/doors.
You layer up when it gets cold, why not your house ;^)
|
114.335 | :-) | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Wed Mar 22 1989 21:02 | 3 |
| A vertical log home??!!!
Excuse me, but you want the FORTS_AND_TEEPEE notes file!
|
114.330 | Bugs etc | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Wed Mar 22 1989 21:06 | 5 |
| A small problem might be that you will be creating dozens of nice
dark tunnels. If your T1-11 is applied vertically (like it usually
is) and the bottom is open (i.e., doesn't but up against a piece
of trim), all kinds of things can crawl in there. Caulk would probably
solve the problem.
|
114.331 | I don't see any problem | WORDS::DUKE | | Thu Mar 23 1989 07:25 | 12 |
| I fully agree with .1 and .2
There are lot of Tyvec (sp) type products that breathe which
probably could be used over the T111. If the clap board is
installed well the seal everywhere should be pretty tight.
Hadn't considered the vetical 'bug tunnels'. Blocking them
as .2 suggests and prehaps a couple other times in the height
if the building ought to dicourage little crawly critters.
Peter Duke
|
114.336 | Try the log homes conference | RITA::HYDE | Have Rdb Manuals -- Will Travel | Thu Mar 23 1989 10:12 | 7 |
| >> Anybody have any suggestions on re-siding a vertical log home with
>> vertical cedar siding?
Try note 49 on sushi::log_homes.
Kurt
|
114.332 | re .1: vapor barrier? | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Thu Mar 23 1989 15:49 | 10 |
| > A vapor barrier would only serve to encourage rot in the T1-11 since
> it will now contains moisture and will store that moisture and rot.
> Building paper would reduce the squeaks if the clapboard moved in
> relation to the T1-11 but I don't think that would ever be a problem.
I thought that tar paper would act as a pretty good vapor barrier.
Doesn't it?
Thanks,
Larry
|
114.337 | Adding keypad 7 | OASS::B_RAMSEY | My hovercraft is filled with eels. | Thu Mar 23 1989 16:21 | 4 |
| Tried to add the keypad 7 stuff to the last reply but was not priv'd
enuf.
Hit keypad 7 to add sushi::log_homes to your notebook.
|
114.333 | | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Thu Mar 23 1989 21:12 | 4 |
| re .-1
Absolutely not. Building paper is vapor-permeable. Exactly why
it's used on the OUTSIDE of sheathing.
|
114.583 | sealing siding at edges ? | ISLNDS::BELKIN | though I cannot explain that in rhyme | Tue Apr 25 1989 14:25 | 14 |
|
I am about to buy a new-construction townhouse (heellllpppp!!!! :-).
It has cedar siding, which, the Paul Cornell the well_recommended_
home_inspector tell me, has not been caulked at all the edges
where the siding meets vertical facia. He says it need to be
caulked to be properly water-tight (sounds reasonable to me).
Problem is, I think the builder (Guy Donell - Ayer) wouldn't go for
this, the building is nearly complete. How important is this
- how much should I try to fight for this ?
thanks, Josh Belkin
PS. anyone know anything about Guy Donell?
|
114.584 | DIY | TASMAN::EKOKERNAK | | Tue Apr 25 1989 14:44 | 9 |
| It's easy to do yourself. All you need is a caulk gun and some
clear caulking. So, go ahead and ask the guy, and if he refuses,
just do it yourself.
I'd personally do it myself, then I'd know it was done to my own
satisfaction.
Elaine
|
114.585 | besides, I'm afraid of heights! | ISLNDS::BELKIN | though I cannot explain that in rhyme | Tue Apr 25 1989 15:29 | 16 |
|
Sure, but :
The entire building needs it. 4 townhouses, 3 story building.
Something the Condo Ass. (when it gets set up) would have contracted
to do. Anything on the outside of the building needs approval
of the condo ass. If and when I buy this place, and I am the
first buyer there, the condo ass. will consist of 1 part me,
and 3 parts Guy Donell (the builder). I am concerned that
he will stick me with this once I buy. (also possibly stick me
me with gutters, and trimming overhanging trees.)
Josh
ps. where in here, or in REAL_ESTATE, are there any notes on
"tips for new-construction buyers" or some such?
|
114.586 | Oops | HPSTEK::EKOKERNAK | | Tue Apr 25 1989 15:31 | 4 |
| Sorry, I didn't notice that it's a multi-story townhouse. Good
luck.
Elaine
|
114.587 | | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Wed Apr 26 1989 09:39 | 0 |
114.338 | Tar paper before siding? | GIAMEM::MICHAUD | Think about software that thinks! | Mon May 08 1989 09:32 | 18 |
|
I've tried searching everywhere in this file for the answer to my
question with little luck. If the topic is opened elsewhere, would
someone point me in the right direction? Anyway here goes....I am
about to install red cedar shingles on the upper half of my split
entrance and the question is...do I need to paper the T111 before
I install the shingles? What is the advantage of adding paper? The
house was built in the following way from the inside out.
T111/ 2*4 studs/ insulation / plastic barrier / sheet rock
Doesn't this mean that I already have a vapor barrier? If I paper
the outside, wouldn't I be trapping the moisture within the walls?
thanks for the help!
john
|
114.339 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Mon May 08 1989 09:43 | 3 |
| See also note 738 for some similar information.
Paul
|
114.340 | use it | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Mon May 08 1989 10:26 | 4 |
| Building paper is vapor-permeaable (so is Tyvek). So it's OK to
use on a wall that already has a vapor barrier on the other side.
You will not be trapping moisture.
|
114.341 | Tyvek! | MISFIT::DEEP | Are you suggesting coconuts migrate? | Mon May 08 1989 15:04 | 7 |
|
Since you're doing it, do it right... use the Tyvek...
Best money you'll ever spend.
Bob
|
114.109 | square cedar shingles??? | HPSCAD::WHITMAN | Acid rain burns my BASS | Tue May 30 1989 14:04 | 16 |
| After reading the various notes related to the subject I think I can
guess the answer to my question, but here goes.....
Are all cedar shingles non-square???
It seems like such a pain to have to square both edges of each shingle. I am
putting up 'clear' grade white cedar shingles and I expected them to be square
enough so I could butt them together without getting significant V's between
the shingles... no such luck. The first couple bundles I've squared with a
radial-arm saw, but there must be a better way.
What are the differences bewteen 'clear' grade and 'extra' grade shakes?
Al Now_I_know_why_I_play_with_computers_instead_of_installing_siding
|
114.110 | No problem? | MCNALY::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Tue May 30 1989 16:33 | 14 |
| > Are all cedar shingles non-square???
> ... butt them together without getting significant V's between the shingles...
I think V-less gaps are both inevitable and nothing to worry about. The
shingles I replaced (just a couple bundles worth) overlapped each other quite
a bit. The bottom of one shingle was directly on top of two (or more?) others,
in various stages of "reveal". A gap between any two shingles (except at the
very bottom or top) is a gap protected by two lower layers of shingles.
The only hassle with the gaps that I found was painting - it was hard to paint
in the gaps. Pre-treating the shingles (as in .1?) would fix this problem.
(My shingles were 17" (can't remember exactly) tall, and my reveal was only,
I dunno, 4" - 5"?)
|
114.111 | Shingles expand...don't square them | LANDO::RAYMOND | | Wed May 31 1989 13:44 | 7 |
| re .5 >Are all cedar shingles non-square???
Yes, the gaps are required to allow for the expansion of the wood. If
you square the shingle and butt them together you will end up with
shingles buckling and splitting.
Ric
|
114.112 | Look for another brand | MAKITA::MCCABE | | Wed May 31 1989 14:20 | 15 |
| Ref -1
I disagree, you can get red cedar shingled but and rebut, which
will give you a square edge. Different brands of white cedar shingles
also have square edges, a brand I have used with very good sucess
is Maybeck extra's, they are from Canada. I have gotten some very
poor white cedar shingles and ended up re-squaring them myself.
Then I looked around for a better brand of shingle. I usually but
the shingles right up next to each other and have never had a shingle
buckle. The gaps always widen with time, if you leave a big gap,
it will be bigger in a year. Don't force the shingles together let
them rest naturally on the ledger board.
Chris
|
114.113 | A couple more tips to the shingler | BEING::PETROVIC | Looking for a simpler place & time... | Wed May 31 1989 16:11 | 60 |
| Since originally posting this note three seasons ago, I have
finally completed the job. There are a couple of things worth
noting, especially in the areas of spacing between adjacent
shingles. I used my eye most of the time towards the end of
the job, but using a nail at the butt end usually provided a
simple and repeating gap to forestall any possibility of
buckling.
I used 18" shingles whose manufacturer (Teal from Canada)
recommended no more than 7" exposure. My place turned out to
need about 6" exposure to ensure that the courses ended/started
at the window sills. This means that you may have to adjust the
course-to-course spacing a little, however, you can easily vary
that by as much as 1/2"-5/8" without being obvious.
Where you put the final course, say, under a window,
predrilling the nail holes will prevent splitting. Use a drill
you make from the nails you use. Predrill the nail holes at the
rake ends too. It will poke a hole just a shade larger than the
nail, but still provide adequate holding power. I used a 3d hot
dip galvanized box nails. These nails have a rather large head
in comparison to the shank diameter and are recommended by the
manufacturer. To finish under the windows, I used 1-1/4" stop
molding well cuprinoled and stained to match the natural cedar,
covering the nail holes with a matching color wax pencil. The
last course under the soffits was also finished off with the
stop molding.
Rent a pair of pumpjacks and set up a scaffold. It will make
the job go much faster on the gable ends if you don't have to
climb up/down the ladder for shingles and when cutting/fitting
shingles. If you can't do that, invest in a good pair of
steel-shanked workboots. It'll save your feet. Don't get
too worked up over the sheer size of the job. I was concerned
about waiting 'till the end of the summer, however, after I got
started, things went rather quickly. I began the project when
my wife was pregnant with our #2 yard_ape and she was able to
knock up a course or two before she needed to climb a ladder.
Overall, it's a pretty straigtforward project.
To ensure that the courses were straight, I drywall-screwed 1X2
furring strips, making sure they were level, to the wall. As I
moved up the wall, I tried to get the screws to fall between
shingles so you can't see the screw holes in many places. Even
those that didn't eventually closed up. Only close scrutiny
will reveal them. I used a utility knife to cut all but the
thickest shingles and those which went under the windows. There
were just too many of them, so I used the shop saw in the
cellar, predrilling downstairs then nailing them up. I used a
coping saw when I needed special cuts around some triangular
windows in our family room. A block plane will handle fine
fitting and shaving a little off here and there.
Would I do it again? Yes, but I'd get the pumpjacks AND the
steel boots.
Chris
|
114.342 | Tyvek it is! | GIAMEM::MICHAUD | Think about software that thinks! | Thu Jun 01 1989 09:26 | 6 |
|
Guess what folks.........I used the Tyvek!
thanks,
John
|
114.343 | Decorative Shingles | PMROAD::CALDERA | | Fri Jul 07 1989 16:20 | 9 |
| I am restoring an Old Ginger Bread house on the Cape and would
like to know if any one knows where I can buy pre-cut decorative
cedar shingles. Or how to cut regular shingles if you have any
experience at this type work.
Thanks,
Paul
|
114.344 | | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Fri Jul 07 1989 17:10 | 3 |
| what is a pre-cut decorative shingle?
-mark
|
114.345 | | PMROAD::CALDERA | | Fri Jul 07 1989 17:35 | 5 |
| The exposed part of the shingle is cut in various shapes, giving
a pattern when they are all up. There are Fish scale, Octagon, Diamond,
Round and some very intricate ones.
Paul
|
114.346 | OHJ | HANNAH::DCL | David Larrick | Sat Jul 08 1989 11:29 | 66 |
| I've seen these shingles described by the colorful term "fancy-butt".
Very common on Victorian houses.
Note that almost all of the listings below are out west; the proportion
of Victorian houses out there is much greater than it is here in the
east, since until Victorian times everyone out there was living in log
cabins and teepees. I've put the one Massachusetts listing first; it's
also the only listing east of the Mississippi.
[From 1982 Old-House Journal Catalog (buyer's guide):]
Shingle Mill
6 Cote Ave., Dept. OHJ
S. Ashburnham, MA 01466
(617) 827-4889 [May be (508) by now!]
(write or call for information)
Kingsway
4723 Chromium Drive, Dept. OHJ
Colorado Springs, CO 80918
(303) 599-4512
(Catalogue, $2.50)
Mad River Wood Works
P.O. Box 163, Dept. OHJ
Arcata, CA 95521
(707) 826-0629
Old'N Ornate Wooden Reproductions
1121 Bailey Hill Rd., Dept. OHJ
Eugene, OR 97402
(503) 344-6817
[The listing specifically mentions red cedar fancy-butt shingles]
Puget Sound Shake Brokers
12301 218th Pl. SE Suite 711, Dept. OHJ
Snohomish, WA 98290
(206) 568-6642
[Also specifically mentions red cedar fancy-butt shingles in many
shapes]
San Francisco Victoriana
2245 Palou Avenue, Dept. OHJ
San Francisco, CA 94124
(415) 648-0313
Shakertown Corporation
P.O. Box 400, Dept. OHJ
Winlock, WA 98596
(206) 785-3501
[Again, red cedar fancy-butt shingles are called out as a specialty]
[From ads in Jan/Feb '89 OHJ:]
Vintage Wood Works
513 South Adams, #1379
Fredericksburg, TX 78624
(send $2 for catalogue)
Cedar Guild
51579 Gates Bridge East
Gates, OR 97346
(503) 897-2541
(write or call for information and prices)
|
114.347 | Suppliers & info in Fine Homebuilding | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Sat Jul 08 1989 15:01 | 14 |
| You might want to consider cutting them yourself. If so, check out the
June/July 1989 Fine Homebuilding (still available at "better" hardware
stores). Pages 42 - 45 show shingle shapes & how to put them together to
form wall patterns. They also list a mostly different set of suppliers:
3 on the west coast, one in British Columbia (Canada), and one in R.I.:
South Country Post and Beam
P.O. Box 432
W. Kingston, R.I. 02892
The only repeat between their list and .-1 is Shakertown Corporation.
Enjoy,
Larry
|
114.348 | CEDAR SIDING and OIL STAIN | RAIN::ZELISKO | | Mon Jul 17 1989 13:27 | 18 |
|
I am having a problem with my Cedar siding. My home is only 7
years old and I have restained it three times already. The problem
is that the stain doesn't appear to last. I have used Olympic oil
stain and after staining the house last year the house looks like it
requires it again this year. That is instead of the redwood color,
I now have the boards looking "white" or sun bleached.
I have two questions, first is the condition described above
common to stained vs painted cedar or is it the quality of the stain.
And second is there a CLEAR stain that I could reapply so that I don't
darken the color of the wood. Is there a product that is just the
Linseed Oil without the coloring pigments.
Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.
> Ed <
|
114.349 | Brightener? | ALLVAX::MCDONALD | Teetering on the brink... | Mon Jul 17 1989 13:51 | 14 |
|
Have you tried using any "brightener" products (e.g. DECK AND WOOD
BRIGHTENER)?
I just used Deck/Wood Brightener on my 1 year old p.t. deck followed
by a clear sealer and the results were amazing! I didn't expect
much since the can stated that it couldn't bring back the original
wood look of the p.t. due to the treating process, but wow!
Unfortunately I splashed some of both products on my redwood house
(also 1 year old) where the deck butts up against it and... those
spots look so great I'll have to do the whole house now!
* MAC *
|
114.350 | | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | Week 3: Raising the Roof | Mon Jul 17 1989 14:41 | 6 |
| The instructions on Olympic oil solid stains say to only use it on bare
wood. They recommend their latex solid stain for previously stained wood.
I'm not sure whether that also applies to their semi-transparent
stains.
Gary
|
114.351 | 1028,1510,1533 | ALIEN::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Mon Jul 17 1989 16:18 | 18 |
| This note has been temporarily write-locked pending approval of the author.
To the author: This subject is already under discussion in this file, under the
topics listed in the title. Please look at these notes; you may find that your
question is already answered, or you may find a note where your question would
be an appropriate continuation of the discussion. Note that since nearly
everyone uses NEXT UNSEEN to read notes, your question will get the same
exposure whether it is a response to a two-year-old note or it is its own new
note. These topics were found using the keyword directory (note 1111), and you
may find other notes relating to this subject by examining the directory
yourself.
We do, however, welcome new notes if they explore a specific aspect of a
problem that may be under general discussion. And this moderator has been
known to make mistakes. :^) So if after examining these notes, you wish to
continue the discussion here, send me mail.
Paul [Moderator]
|
114.164 | Chemical Stripping: Ongoing saga | CIMAMT::KELLY | Feelin' a little edgy | Mon Jul 31 1989 14:56 | 97 |
| Like many others who have decided to refinish the exterior of their
house, I've read every note I can find about the various techniques.
Here's my (ongoing) story:
I've got a small cape with cedar shingles. There are at least five
coats of white paint, dating from '53, when the house was built. In
general, the house was well maintained, although the paint was allowed
to deteriorate in the two years prior to me purchasing the place. The
shingles are uniformly in excellent condition.
I originally considered sand blasting, as a neighbor had good luck with
the process (although MUCH sand was left behind!). However, the vendor
my neighbor used has since dropped residences because the town ordinances
vary so much, and the post-cleanup mess. From what I've been able to
gather, you'd better have understanding neighbors if you can find some-
one to do the blasting. One vendor quoted $4500 over the phone...I do
the cleanup...no guarantee on window etching; this did not give me a
warm feeling about the vendor or the process.
Re-shingleing was out, not so much for the expense, but it seemed
criminal to waste the good shingles on there now. Besides, there's
all that work to take them down!
Heat guns were out, due to the fire hazard.
Vinyl siding was not an option.
So, I bought a good scraper (Sandvik makes one with replaceable tungsten
blades for about $15.00) and some '5f5' stripper and went to work.
This method is painfully slow, but you can do a good job. There are four
steps in the process I'm using: Steps 1 and 2 involve using the stripper,
followed by scraping. Step 3 is sanding with a rotary sander and fine
sandpaper. Step 4 is sanding with a finish (orbital) sander with medium
sandpaper. One can remove every trace of paint with this technique,
although I really struggle with the paint on the bottom edge of each
shingle: the combination of the shingle end grain (tough to scrape) and
the buildup of paint make it difficult.
Step 1 has since been replaced with another process: Peel-Away. This
product is basically a chemical stripping system; here's how it works:
1. Apply Peel-Away in a thin layer (it has the consistency of toothpaste,
or spackling compound) over an area roughly three ft wide by four feet
high.
2. Apply the special paper Peel Away gives you; it's an absorbent layer
backed with plastic sheeting.
3. Twenty four hours later, remove the paper and the vast majority of the
paint comes with it. Judicious application of a spatula or putty
knife helps here.
4. Hose down the freshly stripped surface with high-pressure (nothing
fancy...just my garden hose at max pressure) to remove more.
This stuff is expensive: the best price I found was approx. $18/gallon.
A gallon is probably good for 50 - 100 sq.ft. The amount of special
paper you get does not match the 'area capability' of the gallon of
P/A, so I found almost the same material in a disposable drop cloth for
$3 for approx. 30 sq.ft...works just as well. I wouldn't be surprised if
doing my entire house cost $800 - $1000 in chemicals alone; maybe more.
One BIG PLUS is this stuff is not noxious to work with. It doesn't
use the same chemicals as '5f5' or equivalent. I use gloves when applying
it, but I could get away without using them. I use a section of
gutter as a paint catch basin:
|
siding |
---------------+
|
block |
wall |
|[_] gutter here
---------------------grade--------
I'm after one wall at a time (starting in back to get my chops down
before I let the nighbors see what I'm up to!). I've got the first wall
about one-third through the four steps I outlined above in 40 hours of
work. I expect my productivity to go up from here on out, since I've
learned a lot since I began.
Peel Away is made by Dumond Chemical in Long Island and is available
from Sherwin Williams dealers. Apparently Dumond makes other, faster
acting varieties of the same stuff, but the current 24 hour wait isn't
a problem. I don't know if the other flavors are better or worse at
pulling off paint.
I'll keep stats on what I'm doing, so that at least one data point will
be available. I'll be glad to demo the process to anyone with an
interest...I live in Maynard, MA.,...you've heard of Tom Sawyer, right?
;^)
Regards,
John Kelly
|
114.165 | | VMSSG::NICHOLS | Herb - CSSE support for VMS | Wed Aug 02 1989 11:34 | 7 |
| Sure do appreciate this blow by blow description John
thankyou
herb
|
114.352 | Wanted: Shake siding retailers | EUCLID::TOWNLEY | | Thu Aug 10 1989 12:31 | 5 |
| I'm looking to buy shakes for siding on my house, where
can I find a good selection and price. I saw grey shakes
at Somerville that look OK for $100/sq. I want more of a selection
and lower price, can anyone help?
Thanks.
|
114.353 | Do you really want shakes? | SALEM::PAGLIARULO_G | | Thu Aug 10 1989 13:16 | 15 |
| To each his own but if you're looking for shakes to totally redo
your house rather than for just repairing areas, I'd think twice about
using them. I have them on my house and at painting time they are
a nightmare. Especially if I have to repair an area with new shakes.
They soak up the paint like a sponge. It's like someone took a
perfectly good shingle and said, now how can we screw this up - I
know, let's put grooves in it! They are more expensive also.
Next time, rather than paint I think I'm gonna rip these damn
things off.
By the way, is there a logical reason for the grooves in shakes?
George
|
114.354 | | SALEM::PAGLIARULO_G | | Thu Aug 10 1989 13:19 | 6 |
| Also, I think they only come in grey. The grey is a primer. If
you want another color it's DIY. I've never seen unprimed ones.
You might give Chagnon Lumber a call in Nashua if it's in your area of
interest.
George
|
114.355 | Shakes to match asbestos | EUCLID::TOWNLEY | | Thu Aug 10 1989 14:24 | 8 |
| The shakes are for my addition, the rest of the house is asbestos
and the shakes seem to match the best. Also alot of the houses
around have some type of shake that looks pretty good, one neighbor
said that his came pieced together in 3ft lenghts 20yrs ago.
Thanks for letting me know that they only come in 1` color, my abestos
shingles are gray so thats another reason why I'm considering them.
The other alternative is to use vinyl siding.
|
114.356 | Moores has em... | BEACHS::LAFOSSE | | Thu Aug 10 1989 14:28 | 8 |
| I just picked up a pkg, $109 for primed shakes for some repair work,
they had unprimed red ceder that were cheaper, but i did'nt feel
like priming them myself. They definately look like their gonna be
a nightmare to paint.
Got em at Moores in Leominster
Fra
|
114.322 | Goldplated clapboard sunburst | CLOSET::T_PARMENTER | No brain no pain | Fri Aug 25 1989 10:09 | 6 |
| I have a clapboard sunburst over my front door and it is my fancy that
it would look wonderful done in gold leaf. My painter said the gold
leaf would cost about $250 plus application. I know people put gold
leaf on picture frames and the like without busting their budgets, but
I was hoping I could inspire some comments on the idea, the technique,
the cost, longevity, tackiness quotient, etc.
|
114.323 | Gold Leaf from memory | OASS::B_RAMSEY | only in a Jeep... | Fri Aug 25 1989 21:28 | 28 |
| This should really be a new note topic about applying GOLD LEAF..
... and should probably by in a hobby or crafts conference but....
From what I have read, you apply a paint or glue to the surface
to be gilded. Take an artists paint brush, pick up the gold leaf
with the brush, and apply the leaf to the paint/glue. Press the
leaf to the paint/glue with the brush. Allow to dry. When dry
the gold leaf that was outside the paint/glue area, is wiped away
as excess.
It is my understanding that gold leaf is sold in packets much like
a book. Even numbered pages are gold leaf with odd numbered pages
a tissue like paper to separate the gold leaf. The books I have
seen in my reading and hobby shops are about 4x6 inches square.
Once applied it would need a clear coat of finish to protect it
from outside weather. I read an article about applying gold leaf
as a form of lettering on a car and this all based on what I recall
from that article.
As to tackiness quotient, If you have a brass door kick plate, brass
door handle and a brass knocker on the door to pick up the gold tone,
it might kind of all blend together. Even so, I think it would score
real high on the tacky scale.
p.s. Mr Moderator, maybe you would like to start a new topic and
move these replies there? Or would this be better discussed in
another conference?
|
114.324 | It belongs here, IMO | AKOV13::FULTZ | ED FULTZ | Mon Aug 28 1989 10:31 | 17 |
| This gold leaf discussion might warrant a new topic. But I believe it
is appropriate for this conference. After all, the guy is asking about
putting this leaf on his house for accent. This would seem no
different than asking about using oil to paint the house, or what type
of paint to use for the trim on his windows.
As for tacky, if the guy likes it, and is willing to pay the price to
put it on, then I guess he is entitled to do it. I can't really
visualize what it would look like. I think I would almost have to see
it to have a feel for how it would look. I think maybe this is an area
that imaging computers would be great for. Then, we could see the
results of our efforts before we begin. This would help to avoid
costly errors in design or whatever. It would definitely help on color
designs and kitchen designs.
Ed..
|
114.325 | regarding the aethetics of gilding | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Mon Aug 28 1989 12:46 | 7 |
|
RE: .8
Is it a Victorian? If so, it's definitely in keeping with the
Victorian mindset. If it's a 18th century colonial, then I
definitely wouldn't do it.
|
114.326 | REAL gold leaf is much different to use | CARTUN::VHAMBURGER | Woodcarvers are sharp people! | Mon Aug 28 1989 13:51 | 41 |
| <<< Note 3100.9 by OASS::B_RAMSEY "only in a Jeep..." >>>
> From what I have read, you apply a paint or glue to the surface
> to be gilded. Take an artists paint brush, pick up the gold leaf
> with the brush, and apply the leaf to the paint/glue. Press the
> leaf to the paint/glue with the brush. Allow to dry. When dry
> the gold leaf that was outside the paint/glue area, is wiped away
> as excess.
Yup, that is close to the right approach.....but there is a lot more to it.
the Glue needed is called sizing, and takes up to 6 hours to set up
properly before the leaf is applied. The artists paint brush to pickup the
leaf is a special brush, and is a sable variety. Of course, this has to be
applied with no wind to blow stuff into the sizing, and requires all kinds
of specialized talents to handle the leaf....it is so fragile that the
thickness is not measurable by ordinary machinists devices.....it literally
disintergrates if you touch it or pick it up incorrectly. This is nota job
for amateurs. If you really want to learn how to do it, try gold leafing
picture frames for a while, first, then graduate to bigger stuff.
> It is my understanding that gold leaf is sold in packets much like
> a book. Even numbered pages are gold leaf with odd numbered pages
> a tissue like paper to separate the gold leaf. The books I have
> seen in my reading and hobby shops are about 4x6 inches square.
What you have seen is imitation gold leaf books. Sold by several companies,
it is intended for interior use only, although they may claim differently.
It is much cheaper than the real stuff, and much easier to use. Real gold
leaf books are (Last time I priced them) in the range of $28.00 per book,
anda book covers about 2 sq. ft.....(think of that next time you see the
Massachusetts state house dome...it is *REAL* gold leaf!) It is priced
based on the market value of gold.....
> Once applied it would need a clear coat of finish to protect it
> from outside weather.
Real leaf does not require a clear coat.....in fact, that would reduce its
brilliance and luster.
Vic H
|
114.327 | More on leaf | GEMVAX::RICE | | Mon Aug 28 1989 17:41 | 18 |
| For outdoor work, you may want to use what is called "patent leaf"
which is gold leaf on a type of wax paper. You cannot work with
loose gold leaf outdoors, due to the wind, as mentioned in a previous
note. For outdoor work, such as domes, etc., the adhesive is a type
of varnish. Having the gold leaf on the wax paper allows it to be
placed against the tacky varnish, and the paper peels off. Real
gold leaf is incredibly delicate to handle, as previously noted,
and I have ruined sheets of it by sneezing while I worked. As far
as real versus imitation (or Dutch metal, as it is sometimes called),
you have to go by what it is worth to you. For antique work, I would
only use real gold. For other applications, the imitation can be
quite suitable. Note that the imitation must be sealed to prevent
discoloration. Leaf is also available in silver, aluminum, copper,
palladium, as well as different karats of gold, which go from pale
yellow to rich gold. Many light (or lemon) gold items are leafed
with silver that has been covered with a tinted shellac.
Joseph
|
114.500 | Staining T-111 - do it before installation? | PRGMUM::FRIDAY | Patience averts the severe decree | Tue Sep 12 1989 14:24 | 15 |
| We are in the midst of planning an addition for our
home. Along with the addition, the contractor is going to
reside our home, and we're probably going to choose T111
plywood.
I want to stain the plywood before it's installed. That is,
the contractor will deliver the plywood, I'll stain the sheets,
and he'll work with the pre-stained wood, thereby avoiding
having to find and pay a house-painter.
Has anyone done this?
What are the mechanics of dealing with a large number
of sheets of plywood, such that staining and stacking
them can be managed in a somewhat efficient manner?
|
114.501 | I'd reconsider this | ALLVAX::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Tue Sep 12 1989 15:11 | 13 |
|
You're residing your house with plywood???? Oh well.
I think it's a DUMB idea to stain the "plywood" before the contractor
puts it up. How is he going to keep from marking up the "plywood"
while he's putting it up???? What's he going to do hammer very lightly
8*). Secondly it's easier to stain the wood once it's on the house.
You don't have to worry about making marks on the wood when you
move it around.
Mike
|
114.502 | Nahh | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Wed Sep 13 1989 11:12 | 7 |
| I agree with .-1. Prestaining is a bad idea. Not only hammering
and general handling will mess it up, but presumably some of the
sheets have to be cut - that will also make a mess.
Prestaining is normally only done on the BACK (unexposed) side of trim
pieces to protect them against any water which creps in after
they're up.
|
114.503 | It is NOT a bad idea | AKOV13::FULTZ | ED FULTZ | Wed Sep 13 1989 13:23 | 20 |
| As a contrast to the previous two replies, I think you are smart to
prestain the T-111. As a clarification, T-111 is not JUST plywood. It
is an honest, acceptable siding which is used on many application. We
used it on a barn we built. We did both methods - stain before and
after putting it up. We noted a couple of things
1) If you stain before you put it up, you have to be cautious when
setting the nails. You may want to emphasize this to the
contractor. He will want to avoid hammer marks (which he SHOULD
be avoiding anyway).
2) If you stain after you put it up, it is a very messy job which
should not be done on a windy day. We wore as much as we put
on the wall.
One major recommendation would be to use a spray painter like the
Wagner power painter. It will make the job go faster.
Ed..
|
114.504 | Go fo it ! | BAGELS::RIOPELLE | | Thu Sep 14 1989 10:54 | 17 |
|
Based on my experience this past spring painting T111 it might be
smart to pre-stain the sheets before you put them up. I primed the
T111 with a oil base primer and then painted it with California
Latex. I tried to use a brush, and even a roller, takes too long.
So I switched to my sprayer, and finished a 10x16 shed in 1 hour
for the primer and 1 hour for the latex plus 1/2 hour to go back
and re-spray the groves in the T111, it hard to get that paint in
there.
I'd lay the sheets on a large sheet of plastic and go wild sparying
them. Don't worry about the contractors cuts and nails. It'll be
alot easier to go back and touch up those kinds of things
|
114.505 | Ideal Pad Job | IAMOK::DELUCO | Jim DeLuco, Corp VTX Program | Thu Sep 14 1989 14:08 | 16 |
| I do recomend pre-staining. I did this for an interior job and the
results were very pleasing. There was very little touch up work
necessary as a result of the construction. I don't recommend spraying,
especially for wood that will be on the exterior. Sprayed paint or
stain will not last nearly as long as paint applied with a brush or
pad.
My recommendation is to use a pad. You will use much more stain than
spraying, but that's good. The T111 will suck up the stain like a
sponge but it will go on very quickly. I layed the sheets out over a
couple of saw horses and put the stain in a roller tray. I stained 11
sheets in less than two hours.
I have used pads for stain and paint and would use nothing else. I've
done a house with pads and the time and effort saved (vs brush) is
considerable.
|
114.506 | Consider resale value also | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Thu Sep 14 1989 14:16 | 9 |
| To reiterate something that was said in .1, although not elaborated on, you
might want to reconsider re-siding with T-111. You will save some money over
having it resided with vinyl or aluminum or with the nicer cedar, but you will
most likely lose more than you save in the resale value of the house. If
you're planning on living there a long time, this may not matter, but otherwise
the T-111 may actually cost you a considerable sum of money rather than saving
any.
Paul
|
114.507 | looks great on many contemporaries... | TEKVAX::KOPEC | I'm not. | Thu Sep 14 1989 14:22 | 4 |
| Actually, some houses look quite nice in T-111... I guess it depends
on the design and the environment..
...tom
|
114.508 | What to do with wet sheets of T-111? | PRGMUM::FRIDAY | Patience averts the severe decree | Thu Sep 14 1989 15:28 | 18 |
| Someone recommended using a pad instead of a brush or sprayer, so
I'll probably try that. I had been considering using a sprayer,
but apparently a pad will allow me to get a much better coat.
But, what do you do about the wet sheets? Do you leave them laying
flat, all spread out in the yard until they're dry? Do you stack
them with separators so they can dry?
Also, what kind of coverage can one expect (yes, I know this is
VERY dependent on the stain used, and other parameters)?
For those of you suggesting that T-111 is not the best siding,
I agree. But we can't conceive of our house with anything other
than the "vertical" look, and T-111 is probably going to be what
we have to go with because of cost constraints (sigh).
Thanks,
Rich
|
114.509 | Estimates... | 5THAVE::SERV | D.S. - Yelling is good for you. | Thu Sep 14 1989 15:49 | 13 |
| I just painted my mother-in-law's shed two weeks ago. It was a
10 x 12 shed done with T-111. There were two of us painting with
paint pads. It took two gallons of primer and two gallons of latex
paint to cover the shed. Each coat took approx. 2 hours to apply.
It was a dry and breezy day and each coat was dry to the touch within
an hour.
Hope this info helps.
BTW my shed is also T-111 and we painted it using brushes and
rollers...NEVER AGAIN!
Serv
|
114.510 | try using strapping w/nails as spacers | TRITON::FERREIRA | | Fri Sep 15 1989 07:35 | 15 |
| I would use 4 pieces of strapping, a couple of handfulls of common nails,
(whatever's handy) and a convienient wall. Drive the nails "partially" thru
each piece of the strapping at say at ~1 inch intervals. Use two of these
spiney strappings on the ground, nail heads up, to keep the stained sheets
off the ground and keep the bottoms from sliding out and the other two on the
top to keep the sheets separated until they dry. Find a sheltered wall, I
would hate to see t-111 kites sailing thru the air or a domino affect should
your sheets be accidently pushed over.
I would keep away from placing sticks between the sheets. Those sticks may
act a sponges and absorb some of the stain leaving stripes. experience ;^)
Hope this helps
Frank
|
114.511 | IF you can wait a bit... | VOLKS::JACKSON | KEN | Fri Sep 15 1989 13:51 | 12 |
|
We built a 10 X 12 shed the latter part of the summer, two years
ago. We used T-111. Spring of the followin year we restained
our house. It was at this time we stained the shed. (The house
is another story.) The shed was a breeze. Not just because of
the smaller size but because the T-111 had had a chance to season.
It took my wife and I a couple of hours using brushes only to do one
coat of quality stain. Its been a year and a half with no sign of
fading, etc.
Ken
|
114.512 | | NSSG::FEINSMITH | I'm the NRA | Fri Sep 15 1989 14:32 | 6 |
| I did a 9 x 10 shed this summer and used a "staining brush" to do the
T1-11 and it went very easy. The brush is wider and has a different
bristle than a regular buush, but holds more stain and doesn't splatter
as badly.
Ertic
|
114.166 | Peel Away: The saga continues... | CIMAMT::KELLY | Feelin' a little edgy | Mon Nov 06 1989 16:29 | 64 |
| Here's an update on the .5 note:
As I hoped, I walked up the learning curve on Peel Away, so I was able to
complete one side of my cape in 62 hours of work, including two coats of
stain. Given that I have roughly 460 ft^2 of shingles, that works out
to about 7.5 ft^2/hour. I'd be inclined to use 10ft^2/hour as an estimator
from here on out.
Although I would have liked to use a transparent stain, the Peel Away
left some areas of darker wood which would have showed through a
transparent stain. I wound up using Pratt & Lambert oil-based opaque
stain, getting about 300 ft^2 coverage/gallon on the first coat and
something like 450ft^2/gallon for the second coat. The first coat
_almost_ covered completely.
A few additional steps that I left out of note .5:
I've deduced that Peel Away is a caustic, basic chemical, because
they include a mild acid which one sprays on after removing the paint.
All of these chemicals are _very_ weak when compared to the stuff
I used to use to strip paint, so I would emphasize there's nothing
scary about 'em.
I purchased a rotary sander that I use to remove the approximately 5%
of paint that resists the Peel Away. I could certainly apply another
coat of P/A, but the sanding is pretty quick. I use 50grit discs and
exercise _extreme_ caution when using the sander, because it can remove
material more quickly than you can believe.
The rotary sanding leaves swirl marks, so I use a monster orbital
finishing sander with 40grit to remove those. Although this might
sound like overkill, the orbital sanding takes practically no time and
really helps the surface finish.
Just to re-cap, here's the updated list of steps:
a. Peel Away applied, sit 24 hours.
b. Putty knife the Peel Away off...about 80-85% of the paint will come
off.
c. Water wash and scrub brush the surface to remove the paint remnants.
Another 10% of the paint will come off in this step.
d. Neutralize the P/A by spraying on the mild acid. Test the pH
(neutrality) of the siding with a pH test kit included in the
P/A. One application was sufficient for my house.
e. After waiting for things to dry, rotary sand to remove remnants.
f. Finish sand with _monster_ orbital (sucker's heavy!)
g. Two coats of stain.
Scrapers and such are still required for the margins between window
casings and shingles and other similar places.
I'll let you know how the stain holds up over the winter.
Regards,
John Kelly
|
114.65 | To pre-dip or not? | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Sun Nov 19 1989 22:59 | 10 |
| Getting back to the base note... why pre-dip? Is that dramatically better
than staining them after they are up? In my case, I'm paying someone to
install them but I'm going to be staining them myself. So it is very
much simpler (in terms of scheduling, at least) to stain them after
installation. Sure, staining both sides would be some improvement, but
is it enough that I ought to try to dip them between delivery and when
my contractor puts them up?
Thanks,
Larry
|
114.66 | Reference on pre-dipping | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Sun Nov 19 1989 23:12 | 7 |
| I found a reference -- note 2521.3 says that pre-dipping reduces cupping.
But does it reduce it enough to be worth some pain to make it happen?
Or is this something for perfectionists only? Perhaps I should mention
that the building I am siding will not get much direct sun.
Thanks,
Larry
|
114.357 | Does semi-transparent stain on cedar clapboards=mildew? | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Sun Nov 19 1989 23:19 | 21 |
| I plan to put cedar clapboards on a garage I am building, which won't
get very much direct sun. I would like to use a semi-transparent stain.
I live in central MA.
A friend in Rhode Island says that several people she knows who have done
this have to steam clean mildew off their clapboards every few years.
Actually, everyone she knows with semi-transparent stained clapboards
has this problem on at least some sides of their houses, but not the ones
with solid stain.
My question is: is this experience more general, and if so, what can be
done to stop the mildew? Am I stuck with solid stains, or are there brands
of semi-transparent stains with effective mildew inhibitors? Anyone have
experience with this problem?
Thanks,
Larry
PS -- I couldn't find a SIDING-WOOD note that discussed mildew, and the
closest MOLD-MILDEW note (247) is about removing mildew odor from
some kitchen cabinets, not how to prevent it on the outside of a house.
|
114.358 | bleach it first! | QBUS::MULLINS | | Mon Nov 20 1989 08:43 | 12 |
|
QUICKLY! Before it gets write locked!
I would siggest a mild solution of bleach and water which should
than be allowed to dry before applying the stain. This will help
remove any mildew if any already exist and it will also help prevent
the growth of such.
Hope this helps!
Drew.
|
114.67 | To dip or not to dip ... | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Tue Nov 21 1989 16:27 | 16 |
|
I can't speak about dipping clapboards specifically, however
my parents, soaked their rough wood fencing (not cedar or pressure
treated) in thinned oil paint before the fence was built about
15 years ago, and it has never peeled. It has faded now, and could
use another coat, but the wood seems to be in good condition.
I suspect that pre-dipping in a stain would significantly improve
the life of the wood and the stain if you are able to "soak" them
for a period of time, rather than quickly dip them. If you go
the soaking route, you probably want to thin out the stain.
By the way, I assume we are talking about oil-based stain, I
wouldn't advice this with latex.
-tm
|
114.359 | One example..... | UFP::LARUE | Jeff LaRue - MAA Senior Network Consultant | Thu Dec 07 1989 10:47 | 9 |
|
FWIW, I have a semi-transparent stain on the cedar siding of our house
and have not seen any evidence of mildew. This is a house in the D.C.
area....with all of that nasty humid weather in the summer!!!!!
(we do get _lots_ of mildew in the basement.......or at least did until
I finally turned the dehumidifier on!)
-Jeff
|
114.360 | Real life experiences, cont'd | CIMNET::MOCCIA | | Mon Dec 11 1989 14:16 | 14 |
| FWIW, our house has cedar clapboards and Cuprinol semi-transparent
stain, the older oil-based stuff (white can), and it is loaded
with mildew on all the shady areas.
EXCEPT for a small section where, in 1987, I ripped off some
deteriorated and split clapboards, and restained by brushing on
three heavy coats of the same stuff used elsewhere on the house.
That section has not mildewed, although the adjacent areas, spray-
stained the year before, look like somebody threw black pepper at
them. Perhaps it has as much to do with the process as with the
product?
pbm
|
114.361 | | BRAT::DUTHIE | | Tue Dec 12 1989 15:25 | 7 |
| Try a semi-transparent stain with mildewcide and insecticide. I
used Glidden on my house, about three years ago they stopped making
the regular stain and now only sell it with mildewcide and insecticide.
(part of my house has the old stuff, and part has the new. I can't
see any difference in them yet.)
Jim D.
|
114.362 | OLYMPIC stain: NO BETTER | ENOVAX::ZELISKO | | Tue Dec 19 1989 13:04 | 7 |
|
For what it's worth Olympic semi-transparent does the same thing. I
was told in another note to use "CALIFORNIA STAIN" as opposed to
Cuprinol or Olympic. Anyone have any experience with this manufacturer?
Ed
|
114.363 | I used California stains | SMURF::COHEN | | Wed Dec 20 1989 12:25 | 7 |
| We used California on our new Cedar Clapboards. Stained once on the inside
and twice on the exposed side. California was recommended to us
by Nashua Paint and Wallpaper.
First coat was in the spring the second coat was near the end of summer.
So far no problems.
-Larry
|
114.588 | Parts for Sear's Siding Ventilation Drill | STEREO::HO | | Thu Feb 22 1990 16:29 | 28 |
| For the last year or so I had been plagued by a problem with paint
peeling on the exterior wall of my breezeway. During rains and damp
periods moisture would visibly leach out of the clapboards. There was
no readily apparent source for the moisture. I caulked the overhang
above and made sure the drip edges and gutters were working correctly.
No change. The problem occurs only on a 6' X 4' section of exterior
wall.
I mentioned the situation to a co-worker who loaned me his Sear's
SIDING VENTILATION DRILL. This is a jig that allows a 3/8" hole to be
drilled from the bottom of the clapboard parallel to and just below the
surface. A plastic sleeve with a screen in it is then inserted into
the hole to keep insects out. After drilling 72 holes in the affected
area, the leaching seems to have stopped. I'm sure the moisture is
still present but now it at least has a place to go. Not an elegant
solution but I had to do something.
There are a few other places on the house where this treatment may be
useful. But I run out of the screened inserts that are used to plug
the holes made by the drill. This contraption is at least 20 years old
and is no longer listed in the Sear's catalog. When I took it in to a
Sears store and showed it to a salesperson he said he had never seen
one before. Does anyone know where I can get more of the inserts? Is
there a newer technology/device/contraption that has evolved in the
intervening 20 years since this this tool was available that addresses
this problem?
- gene
|
114.589 | | CAMRY::DCOX | | Fri Feb 23 1990 08:51 | 6 |
| Call a Sears Parts/Repair facility; should be listed in your local telephone
book. It's a good bet they will have a parts list on a 'fiche - even for
something that old. They may even have some left in inventory.
Luck,
Dave
|
114.590 | Try specialized catalog | VINO::DZIEDZIC | | Mon Feb 26 1990 10:18 | 4 |
| You might look at one of the Sears specialized catalogs (specialogs)
dealing with Home Improvement. The last time I saw the tool listed
(a few years back) it was in the specialog but NOT the regular
catalog.
|
114.277 | Is Rough Side Out Better When Staining Clapboards? | WSINT::HOUSE | Kenny House - MLO5-2/B6 - 223-6720 | Sun Mar 11 1990 14:16 | 11 |
| I'm replacing my siding with red cedar clapboards. Both sides of the
clapboard will be stained before it goes up -- maybe brushed or rolled
on, maybe dipped. I'd heard (and .3 corroborates) that stain holds
best on the rough side. I'd prefer the smooth side out, so my question
is:
Is it really better to expose the rough side? Is there a
difference in ease of application? In durability? Is there that
much a difference in appearance?
-- Kenny House
|
114.278 | prefer smooth out and stainless nails | SOLAR1::FERREIRA | | Mon Mar 12 1990 08:07 | 12 |
| Hi Kenny, I also much prefer the smooth side out..... the rough side will more
readily absorb the stain and will generally render a darker appearance when
using the same color stain. That's your personal choice, try a couple of
samples before staining everything. I beleive the smooth side out would last
longer, perhaps a more experienced noter will pipe in here. My perspective is,
the rough side will also collect for airboure dust, dirt, pollen, etc. Another
consideration, is the choice of nails. Even galvinized nails will soon leave
runny dark streaks and transparent and semi-transparent stains. I've been told
to use stainless nails but haven't ever looked for them. Any other noters have
suggestions?
Good luck Frank
|
114.279 | | CAMRY::DCOX | | Mon Mar 12 1990 08:26 | 6 |
| Thinking ahead, rough side out clapboards are a real chore to re-stain compared
to smooth side out. However, if you are going to let the siding weather
naturally, then the rough side out is better. Smooth side out shows the
ravages of time and weather (cracks, warping, etc.) more than rough.
Dave
|
114.280 | may save money to use rough side out | VIA::GLANTZ | Mike, DTN 381-1253 | Mon Mar 12 1990 09:23 | 14 |
| Both the siding people and the painters we hired to stain our cedar
clapboard recommended rough side out.
The painters said it didn't make any difference to them as far as
difficulty (and we paid them to hand-brush it, not spray), and it
would look better.
The siding guys said that if you're staining, rather than painting,
then you need the very top grade of siding if you're doing smooth side
out or it will look terrible. We were able to use something like grade
AA clear (or whatever it was called, I forget), which sounds fancy,
but isn't the top grade. It's inexpensive compared to the higher grade
needed if we had wanted smooth side out. We used a Cabot semi-solid
stain and it looks great.
|
114.281 | one vote for rough side out. | SMURF::COHEN | | Mon Mar 12 1990 10:00 | 8 |
| We did ours rough side out. We stained both sides also.
The smooth side coat could bearly hold the stain and runs alot.
The rough side soaked up the stain nicely and looked good when installed.
We used California semi-transparent stains. One coat on the inside and
two on the outside. The outside finish almost looks like it has a light
sheen to it almost like a thin coat of varnish. I think it will last
a long time. We are very happy with the results.
-Larry Cohen
|
114.282 | GLOBE's Handyman Agrees | WSINT::HOUSE | Kenny House - MLO5-2/B6 - 223-6720 | Mon Mar 12 1990 11:46 | 17 |
| Thanks for the quick replies. I guess I shouldn't have come in to work
on Sunday (when I first raised the issue), 'cause the BOSTON GLOBE'S
"Handyman on Call" column had this item.
Q: For my new house, should I put the cedar clapboards on smooth- or
rough-side showing? I plan to apply a solid stain.
A: Either side is accceptable. The rough side will give a rustic look
but also is appropriate for a contemporary look. The stain will hold
better on the rough side. On either side, apply a coat of exterior oil
primer before staining to prevent cedar bleed, the color of the wood
staining the finish. Do not use the primer if you use a semitransparent
stain.
My thanks to Peter Hotton.
-- Kenny House
|
114.283 | | TLE::FELDMAN | Digital Designs with PDF | Mon Mar 12 1990 12:35 | 8 |
| re: .11
I saw that too, and was surprised. There are a number of notes here that
suggest you don't need a primer with a solid stain, at least on cedar (knots
in pine are another story). Conversely, there are notes that suggest you
shouldn't use a semitransparent on cedar at all.
Gary
|
114.167 | P-C 303 Paint Remover? | CRBOSS::CARDINAL | | Fri Apr 06 1990 14:02 | 9 |
| Porter Cable sells a model 303 Paint Remover that is essentially a disk
sander with a carbide grit wheel that has a frame around it and you can
set up the frame to the clapboards on your house (guidebars, etc).
Does anyone have one of these and how well does it work. I know it's
pretty heavy (builds up the arms, don't you know) but before I pay
149.00 I'd like to know this is going to do the bulk of the job. If
anyone has any experience with this tool, please comment....
ken
|
114.168 | I'd like to see this tool | NAVIER::CASEY | | Mon Apr 23 1990 08:58 | 10 |
|
re. -1
Where did you see this tool? I'd like to check it out.
Has anyone ever considered using a hand held power planer to remove
paint from clapboards?
Mark
|
114.169 | | CRBOSS::CARDINAL | | Tue Apr 24 1990 11:15 | 1 |
| SPag's and Tool Warehouse in Worc. Price is mailorder though. kc
|
114.377 | Wash House Siding before Painting/Staining? | IAMOK::DELUCO | Place clever phrase here | Wed May 02 1990 13:53 | 6 |
| In preparing to paint my house exterior is it a good idea to wash the
house (painted cedar shingles). If so are there any suggestions on
what to use and how to use it. For example, is there a pre-bottled
house wash that you can connect to your hose and just spray it on?
|
114.378 | No Related Topics | IAMOK::DELUCO | Place clever phrase here | Wed May 02 1990 13:55 | 6 |
| ps., dear moderator,
To save you some time, I did a DIR/TITLE=HOUSE and WASH and PAINT
and could not find a related topic.
Thank's.
|
114.379 | Didn't title "paint" turn up note 2415? | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Wed May 02 1990 14:20 | 18 |
| This note has been temporarily write-locked pending approval of the author.
To the author: This subject is already under discussion in this file, under the
topics listed in the title. Please look at these notes; you may find that your
question is already answered, or you may find a note where your question would
be an appropriate continuation of the discussion. Note that since nearly
everyone uses NEXT UNSEEN to read notes, your question will get the same
exposure whether it is a response to a two-year-old note or it is its own new
note. These topics were found using the keyword directory (note 1111), and you
may find other notes relating to this subject by examining the directory
yourself.
We do, however, welcome new notes if they explore a specific aspect of a
problem that may be under general discussion. And this moderator has been
known to make mistakes. :^) So if after examining these notes, you wish to
continue the discussion here, send me mail.
Paul [Moderator]
|
114.68 | primer for stain ? | WSINT::HOUSE | Kenny House - MLO5-2/B6 - 223-6720 | Wed May 09 1990 10:29 | 21 |
| My decorator / stain-supplier is trying to convince me, my contractor
and my painter that the initial, pre-installation coat for red cedar
clapboards should be a primer, not the same as the final stain. The
rest of us figure to go with the real thing for both the
pre-installation coat and the next (can't really say "final," can I?)
coat. The decorator says her stain supplier (Fuller-O'Brien)
recommends the primer. I assume that she's talking about a stain
primer, rather than paint, but ya never know.
We want to end up with a solid, oil-based stain in what F-O'B calls
Spruce Green (dark green).
Does anyone have experience with a primer for stain? Am I on solid
ground demanding two coats of the real stain?
I won't bore you with the story of my decorator's selecting a color for
the siding that comes only in paint -- now she's busy adding enough
magenta tint to the Hunter Green to make it look *almost* like Spruce
Green.
-- Kenny House
|
114.69 | | VIA::GLANTZ | Mike, DTN 381-1253 | Wed May 09 1990 11:13 | 12 |
| When in doubt, read the instructions. We used a Cabot "semi-solid"
stain, which didn't require a prime coat, and we used two coats. Other
manufacturers probably have different recommendations about whether to
use a prime coat or not, and yes, it would be a clear coat, not a
paint primer.
On new wood, I would definitely recommend two coats of the stain, even
if you use a primer, especially with the color you've picked. We used
a similar color (Cabot's "spruce blue"), and on some of the rougher
spots, a touch of the cedar color shows through. It wouldn't have hurt
to use three coats -- or maybe a primer and two coats. One coat of
stain would, in my opinion, be unacceptable.
|
114.114 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | How do you get this car out of second gear? | Tue Jul 10 1990 18:08 | 8 |
| I would like to remove some rotting clapboards from my house, upgrade the
insulation by adding a layer of Celotex type insulation, and finally siding
with cedar shingles.
What, if anything, should I put between the Celotex insulatioon and the cedar
shingles?
-Mike
|
114.115 | | VMSDEV::PAULKM::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Wed Jul 11 1990 11:05 | 10 |
| Depending on how thick the celotex is, you're likely to need something. It's
difficult to find nails long enough to anchor the shingles through the celotex
and thin enough not to split the shingles.
You also don't want to do this unless you're sure the house has a good vapor
barrier on the inside of the wall. Celotex (with its foil covering) makes an
excellent vapor barrier, and a good barrier on the outside matched with a poor
barrier inside is an invitation to rot.
Paul
|
114.116 | Removing "MID-COURSE" Shingles | EBISVX::HQCONSOL | | Mon Jul 23 1990 15:53 | 7 |
| Is there a "trick" or special tool used to remove a cedar shingle
and replacing it without having to remove/replace all the UPPER
COURSES of shingles?
I was thinking of trying to slip a hack-saw blade underneath the
shingle to be removed and cutting the 2-3 nails fasting it. Any
comments/suggestions?
|
114.117 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Jul 24 1990 10:49 | 15 |
| Yes, there's a special tool:
+------------+
| | It slips up under the shingles to cut
| | the nails. The lower end (not drawn)
| | has a handle and a place you can hit
| | with a hammer.
| /| |\ |
|/ | | \|
| |
| |
| |
...
handle down here
|
114.196 | pine clapboards and knots | DOJO::JORDAN | | Thu Oct 04 1990 15:50 | 31 |
|
Hi everybody,
I just replaced old clapboards on my house with pine clapboards. The
reason I used pine as opposed to cedar was cost (pine was half the price).
The guy at the hardware store seemed knowledgeable about clapboards and
told me that if I wanted to use the pine, I would first have to shellac
over the knots so that they would not bleed thru the paint. After using
the shellac I primed and put 2 coats of Sears Best Latex on. About a
week later I noticed the paint was bubbling in spots where I shellac'd.
Not all the shellac'd spots, but a good number of them. The rest of the
paint looked good.
One of my friends thought that maybe the wood was still drying out, but I
find it highly coincidental that only the shellac'd spots were bubbling.
In the mean time, to get rid of the bubbles I rub them with my finger (to
pop them) then paint over. Seems to fix the problem, but slowly more
bubbles are appearing elsewhere. I don't know how long this will go
on. Any ideas?
Also, the clapboards have changed size over time (1 month). Where the
boards overlap eachother, the paint seal broke. I kind of expected that
to happen and so went back a couple of weeks after the paint job and
painted those areas. Now, 2 weeks later, it's happening again. Should I
seal the overlapping of the clapboards or just wait till next spring for
the wood to completely dry? More ideas?
thanks,
tj.
|
114.526 | question on applying a sealant to the back side | DATABS::LAVASH | Same as it ever was... | Thu Nov 01 1990 09:27 | 16 |
| Well, this isn't about pine, but it seemed like the best place to
put this. It was either here or under buying wainscoating....
I'm going to be putting up some 1X6 v-groove cedar in my 3 season porch.
I know I should stain/poly the tongue before installing, but should I
put poly on both sides of the wood?
I already have a hot tub with a similar cedar skirt, in the room. I
finished that with a coat of Thomson's then 3 coats of poly. Just
wondering if Thomsons on the back side of the cedar would be enough to
seal it and reduce shrinkage. Or should I just hit it with a coat of
poly, or should the back side be left unsealed?
Thanks,
George
|
114.527 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Thu Nov 01 1990 09:43 | 7 |
| re: .13
If the cedar isn't dry to begin with, it is *going* to shrink as
is dries, no matter what you put on it. The question is just
how long it is going to take: 6 months, 1 year, or 5 years.
I suppose you could embed the wood in a Lucite block and
it wouldn't shrink, but otherwise I think you're going to get
shrinkage, eventually.
|
114.528 | V-Groove questions | R2ME2::BENNISON | Victor L. Bennison DTN 381-2156 ZK2-3/R56 | Fri Jan 04 1991 09:43 | 17 |
| I'm about to purchase V-groove to do my back porch. What are
intelligent questions to ask? I called around and the prices vary
dramatically from place to place. Why?
How do you do V-groove? If you start in a corner, do you face the
tongue out from the corner? If so then I assume that you nail in at
the base of the tongue at an angle toward the back. Is that correct?
What size finishing nails should I use? Is there a good trick for
matching up the pieces above a window with those below the window
(I'm installing the V-groove vertically) so that when you
get to the other side of the window the full pieces start matching up
again? I'm going to poly them before putting them up. Any other
hints? I have 1/4 plywood backing all the way around and plan to glue
as well as nail. What kind of glue? Liquid nails?
Thanks. - Vick
|
114.529 | | ODIXIE::RAMSEY | Take this job and Love it! | Fri Jan 04 1991 10:10 | 33 |
| Scribe the first board to the wall along the groove side. Nail thru the
tongue side at an angle. You might try a floor nailer to get the right
angle and speed nailing. The drawback is it may be heavy to hold in
place and bang the nail. Use a plumb bob or level and mark vertical
reference lines on your backing to line up the boards, kinda like
installing wallpaper. Small gaps of 1/8 do not show up so you can
adjust the boards a tad to make then vertical. When going around
windows you can use the vertical reference lines to keep things lined
up.
The edge for the "last" board on a wall should also be scribed to meet
the corner. When making the cut along the scribed line, make the cut
slightly back angled. This will give you a thinner edge to fit up
against the corner and will be easer to plane if you missed your cut
line. It will also help eleviate stress when you wedge it into place.
Ideally I guess you should try to center the boards on the wall so that
the two boards which are in the corner are about equal width. Kinda
like when installing tile, you start from the middle and work out. We
have vertical groove paneling in our home and they just started with a
full board and the last board was cut to fit. Visually no one notices.
The only problem I forsee is if the last board needs to be less than
1 inch. There will not be enough to cover the groove and scribe and
nail.
Our paneling was put up when the house was built in '58. I have done
some remodeling in that room and it looks like they used an axe or
hatchet to make the vertical cuts to fit around the doorways. It gets
covered with moulding so the cuts don't show but it seems like a crude
method. Maybe they were using the grain of the wood to split the
boards and the roughing up with axe for speed reasons. Anyway the trim
covers this mystery.
|
114.530 | | R2ME2::BENNISON | Victor L. Bennison DTN 381-2156 ZK2-3/R56 | Fri Jan 04 1991 10:56 | 10 |
| Wait! So do I "start in the middle and work out", or do I "Scribe
the first board to the wall along the groove side"?
>The only problem I forsee is if the last board needs to be less than
>1 inch. There will not be enough to cover the groove and scribe and
>nail.
I don't understand what you mean here.
- Vick
|
114.531 | Maybe this will make better sense | ODIXIE::RAMSEY | Take this job and Love it! | Fri Jan 04 1991 14:00 | 31 |
|
> Do I "start in the middle and work out" or do I "Scribe the first
> board to the wall along the groove side"?
If it were me I would "scribe the first board to the wall along the
groove side" and work my way across the wall. One reason being that
you would not be able to nail the tongues when you worked "backwards"
from the middle.
>The only problem I forsee is if the last board needs to be less than 1
>inch. There will not be enough to cover the groove and scribe and
>nail.
I would put a few boards together and them measure the space it takes
up. 6" boards when tongued and grooved are not necessarily 6" and
when you put several together, space between boards will be introduced.
Once I had figured out just how much real space each board takes up, I
would measure the wall and determine if I will end on a full board or a
partial board. If the the partial board is less than 2", I would trim
2" off the *first* board.
My reasoning here is that I want the last board that I put up to be at
least 2" wide so that there is a groove and some board left to scribe
to fit the corner. Less than 2" wide and the ability to shape that
board to fit the space will be more difficult.
What I am doing is making the first board and the last board both
partial boards so that the last board is wide enough so that it is easy
to work with. This is in effect "centering" the middle vertical board.
Does that make more sense or did I just confuse you more?
|
114.532 | | SALEM::PAGLIARULO_G | Reality is a cosmic hunch | Fri Jan 04 1991 21:24 | 10 |
| I put V-groove up in my porch, started from one end, and didn't have any
problems in lining up the boards above and below the windows. The
porch has 12 4'X4' windows. The piece over the window and the
corresponding piece below the window were cut from the same board so
that at the other side they were always lined up. You will probably have
to scribe full length boards to fit around the sides of the window frames.
I didn't worry about figuring it out so that the side boards were scribed
the same around each window. I've got enough things to drive me nuts.
George
|
114.533 | | R2ME2::BENNISON | Victor L. Bennison DTN 381-2156 ZK2-3/R56 | Sun Jan 06 1991 19:20 | 1 |
| re: .18 Yeah, thanks, that makes sense. - Vick
|
114.380 | clapboards, how to remove | BUFFER::RACINE | | Tue Apr 09 1991 12:27 | 18 |
| I am going to put a deck on the side of my old victorian.
Am going to try to duplicate a front porch (without the
roof) don't want to detract from the victorian theme.
Anyway I know I have to remove a few rows of clapboards
to get to the wood that I will be bolting into.
My question: How do you get the damn things off!!At which
line do I start to take them off. I tried to pry them off
last night, started at the bottom of the house, and found
that they didnt move. Do I have to start up three courses
because of the overlap?
This is my first carpentry project so bear with me.
Carol
buffer::racine
|
114.381 | Very carefully (-: | WORDS::DUKE | | Wed Apr 10 1991 08:22 | 12 |
|
> My question: How do you get the damn things off!!
A flat bar (Stanley Wonder Bar or equiv), a hammer, and a
lot of patience. You will have to start above where you need
to remove the clapboards. If you can see where the nails
are, drive the flat bar under the clapboard at the that point
and pry gently. Repeat for all the nails in that board.
Once the board is pried up a bit you should be able pop the
nails so they can be pulled by rapping the board close to
each nail. I'm sure you will get that hang of it. If you
need to save the clapboards, time and patience are the key.
|
114.382 | couple more tools to try | SENIOR::HAMBURGER | Whittlers chip away at life | Wed Apr 10 1991 09:56 | 35 |
| <<< Note 4184.0 by BUFFER::RACINE >>>
-< clapboards, how to remove >-
> My question: How do you get the damn things off!!At which
> line do I start to take them off. I tried to pry them off
> last night, started at the bottom of the house, and found
> that they didnt move. Do I have to start up three courses
> because of the overlap?
Carol,
Instead of the flatbar mentioned in .1, you might also want to consider a
tool called a "cats paw". it will allow you to hammer the "paw" under the
nailhead to pull the nail without trying to bend the whole clapboard up at
once. You may even find you use both bars to get the boards off without a
lot of splitting of the wood. Ask your local tool purveyor to show you both
tools, he/she should know what a cats paw is.
You may want to save the boards of you can, just for fill ins anywhere you
need to replace a clap board.
Another useful tool is the Stanley reciprocal blade holder. This holds the
saw blades used in reciprocal saws and is a cheap tool for all the uses it
has. With a metal cutting blade, you can slide it under a clapboard and saw
thru a hidden nail to remove a board without damaging the board that
overlaps it. Again, your local toy, er tool shop will probably have these
around. Buy a variety of 2-3 blades. I use mine for a hacksaw, rough wood
saw, pruning tool when I need to beat a tree limb into submission,etc...
Somewhere many notes back in a reply is hidden the reason I know all about
residing a house..... 8^(
Good luck!
Vic
|
114.383 | removed aluminum, preparing cedar shingles | FSTVAX::ROTHBERG | | Mon May 20 1991 13:29 | 20 |
| I have a house that was built in 1920. It was sided with cedar
shingles. Sometime in the 50's or 60's, aluminum siding was put up.
Since I never liked the look of the AL, I decided that I was going to
find out the condition of the cedar underneath. (brave or stupid, you
choose!), so after ripping off a small section, I found that It was
in very good condition and it had never been painted!. This weekend
I took all the siding off the back side (2 story, very high, very
scary) So I have a few questions....
- I plan on staining with a solid stain, is there any particular
surface prep since the shingles are so old? (I'm having the whole house
power washed with TSP)
- there are some holes where the AL was nailed up, what should I use to
fill in these holes?
Any thing you can tell me about this would be much appreciated.
thanx,
Marc
|
114.384 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue May 21 1991 09:10 | 2 |
| Just one aside - take the old aluminum siding to a scrap metal dealer.
I think you will discover that it will be *VERY* worth your while.....
|
114.385 | | OAW::MILLER | James' and ??? Daddy� | Wed May 22 1991 17:05 | 2 |
| I agree with -1. You may make more money than what the siding was
worth when it was installed... *8)----------))))))))
|
114.386 | Does it need stain at all? | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Wed May 22 1991 21:53 | 5 |
| Do you need to stain the cedar? I like the look of weathered
cedar, so I intend to not treat the cedar shed we just put up. Am
I missing something?
--David
|
114.387 | so much AL, so little cash! | FSTTOO::ROTHBERG | | Thu May 23 1991 12:04 | 11 |
| The reason that I am staining is because I will need to replace some of
the old shingles and it would look funny with scattered new shingles.
I called a scrapyard the other day and they told me that they would
give me 18 to 20 cents a pound, I was hoping it would be more :~(
This leads me to my next question, where can I get ahold of shingles
that have NOT been rebutted or resquared ??????.
Thanx
Marc
|
114.388 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Thu May 23 1991 12:20 | 8 |
| You ought to be able to get non-rebutted/resquared shingles at
any lumberyard, I expect. I know Coldwell's in Berlin, Mass.
has them, or did the last time I checked.
You may be surprised at how many pounds of aluminum you have, and
even at 18 cents a pound it may add up to considerable $.
Try another scrapyard? I expect they'll all be in the same range,
but you never know.
|
114.389 | in stock at coldwells | FSTTOO::ROTHBERG | | Thu May 23 1991 13:46 | 6 |
| Thanks Steve, I just called Coldwells and they have them in stock.
$32 for 16" and $35 for 18". The guy said this should cover 25 sq. ft.
with 5" to the weather. (price is per bundle).
Thanx,
Marc
|
114.390 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Thu May 23 1991 16:18 | 6 |
| You may want to investigate the different grades. Seems to me that
even the poorer grades haves names that would make one think they
were pretty good. I don't recall what the grades are, but "Grade A"
shingles might in fact be pretty bad; the really good shingles may
be called "special select" or something. Check what you're getting.
|
114.70 | How do I stack??? | JUPITR::FEE | | Fri May 31 1991 12:16 | 9 |
|
I am about to start pre-staining the siding that is going to go on our
house and I'm not sure what to do with the siding after it is stained.
Should I build some king of a rack? Should I stack them with spacers
between each row? I am also thinking of running some kind of rope/wire
across the inside of the unfinished rooms.
What do you think is the best way to dry them.
Tom
|
114.71 | Put them where they go | SMURF::AMBER | | Fri May 31 1991 12:56 | 4 |
| With vertical siding, lean em against the house. With clapboards,
make piles on sawhorses using 8 or 10 foot boards to extend the horse
width.
|
114.72 | | JUPITR::FEE | | Fri May 31 1991 13:09 | 4 |
|
I'm using clapboards. Do I stack the wet clapboards on top of each
other? Should I put spacers between the rows? Will the spacers leave
marks on the clapboards?
|
114.391 | See 745.* for scrap dealers | GOLF::OSBORN | Sally's VAXNotes Vanity Plate | Fri May 31 1991 17:01 | 0 |
114.392 | red cedar vs. white | FSTTOO::ROTHBERG | | Mon Jun 03 1991 10:08 | 8 |
| I have another question about my siding job. Since I will be using a
solid stain, is there a problem with using white cedar instead of red.
The white cedar is almost half the price and I figured since the stain
is solid, you couldn't tell the difference once the job is finished.
so what do you think?
Marc
|
114.73 | Build a rack | 57133::BUCK | What's an impersonal name? | Mon Jun 03 1991 16:25 | 6 |
| I wouldn't stack the clapboards sith spacers. The spacers will
mar the wet stain. I built a rack for the clapboards. Take a scrap
board and nail a nail every inch leaving about an inch of the nail
showing. Build a bunch of these into a rack using a rail of nails for
each 8 feet of clapboard length.
|
114.74 | prime and stain twice? | JUPITR::FEE | | Tue Jun 04 1991 10:11 | 8 |
|
I talked with someone from Edwards paint in Worcester and he said that
I should seal the clapboards on both sides before I stain them. Do you
think that I seal them I can get away with only one coat of stain after
they are up, or should I seal and stain before they are installed and do
a second coat after they are up?
Tom
|
114.75 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-04/S23 -- dtn 381-2684 | Tue Jun 04 1991 18:02 | 21 |
| I reccommend that you use the same stain on both sides of the
clapboards. For drying, get enough firing strips (or scraps of
wood) to lay out about 30-40 clapboards at a time. You'll need a
strip every 3-4 feet of clapboard.
Lay out about 4-6 at a time with the side that'll be against the
house up. Stain that side, then turn them over. Yes, the
stickers will mark the unfinished side, but so what? Its
protected and since you'll never see it the cosmetic
considerations are nil! Then stain the good side. Leave these
and move on to the next batch.
By the time you've done 30-40 the first batch will be dry enough
to be stacked. Stack them with good sides together.
When you instal the clapboards have a can of stain handy and touch
up all the ends you cut as you work. This should give you a
prety good looking wall, but I recommend a second coat of stain
after installation. If you don't do it right away, you'll need it
in a year or so -- it may be convieneint to put it of for a few
months?
|
114.234 | Is this masonite? | SIETTG::CURRIER | Matt DTN 285-3820 | Thu Jul 11 1991 13:21 | 7 |
| Hi,
Is this type of siding still available? There are spots which need
to be replaced. Also, the stuff on this house is 12" wide. Is it
the same as masonite?
Thanks,
Matt
|
114.197 | masonite question?? | JUPITR::BUSWELL | We're all temporary | Tue Aug 20 1991 13:15 | 11 |
|
Question on masonite siding?
can I use felt paper/90 weight under my 8"X 1/2"
clapboard masonite siding?
I would like to,
but I hear it might work to break down the masonite.
Thanks for any help
buzz
|
114.198 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Aug 20 1991 14:23 | 9 |
| Excuse me for asking. Why on earth would you want to use 90# paper
under siding?
I see one major problem with the idea, aside from it being a
waste of money. If you do it you'll have a very solid vapor barrier
just where it should not be - on the cold side of your wall. You
need something that is permeable to water vapor. These days they
use Tyvek; in the old days they used rosin-coated "building paper".
Sometimes they used 15# felt, which basically is not good either
because of the vapor barrier issue.
|
114.118 | replacement for rotting cedar shingles | BRANDX::SULLIVAN | brake for moose. it could save your life. | Mon Aug 26 1991 16:31 | 40 |
| My front porch, which is a concrete slab, spans the doorway (thank goodness),
as well as about 4 feet of siding on either side. The slab is about 2 inches
higher than the sill plate. When the house was initially built (27 years ago),
the first row of shingles went below the top of the slab - without any caulking
or flashing.
current (side view):
||
||
||
||
+---------------------+||->shingles extend below the slab
| slab |||
+---------------------+
I'm in the process of replacing the rotting area now, and would
like input on what I'm considering. I think I should do the following:
1-extend the pine fascia that is currently under the door only to the
end of the porch.
2-place flashing on top of the fascia.
3-place shingles on top of the flashing.
4-caulk the fascia where it meets the concrete slab.
proposed:
||
||
||->remaining rows of shingles
||
+---> flashing between fascia and shingles
."||-> caulking where the "." is
+---------------------+||-> fascia board below slab, even with one below
| slab ||| front door.
+---------------------+
|
114.264 | Nailing 6" clapboards with narrow exposure | CRLVMS::BLACK | Andrew P. Black | Mon Aug 26 1991 16:55 | 34 |
| This is a question on nailing patterns. Although it isn't reflected in
the title to this note, there is a discusssion of nailing siding here
already, so Ithoiught that I'ld continue it. However, other references
are welcome!
I'm just finishing residing part of my house, having installed a new
bow window where sliders used to be. The house was orignially sided in
5" pine bevel siding, (that's 4 1/2" net) nailed up with 3 1/2"
exposure. The nails were driven at the bottom of each clapboard, so
that each nail went through two pieces of siding and each strip of
siding had two nail holes.
Well, you can't buy 5" siding, and when I finally found a place to mill
it for me, they wanted $2 / ft for Cedar. So I'm residing with 6" red
cedar bevel siding from Somerville Lumber. The instructions that came
with the siding, and various books that I've read, all say not to nail
through more than one board at a time, so that is what I've done.
Of course, I'm installing the new siding with the same exposure (3
1/2") as the old, so I have 2" of overlap. Thus, my nails are 2 1/8" or
2 1/4" from the bottom of the boards.
Along came Hurricane Bob, and gave the whole (still unfinished) job a
good soaking. The boards have cupped, quite badly.
Thanks to this note, I now understand the rationale for not putting in
more than one nail per board. But what should I do to minimize further
cupping?
[OK, if the answer is that I should remove all of the siding that I've
just put up and rip off an inch from each clapboard, tell me. Just
don't expect me to do it. I doubt if I could anyway, since the
stainless steel ring-nails won't come out.]
|
114.265 | 3 years later and I haven't changed my mind | ASDS::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Tue Aug 27 1991 09:46 | 12 |
| I was surprised when you said earlier notes (and manufactures) recommended
only driving nails though one board so I reread all the replies (including one
I wrote 3 years ago) and still say that sounds wrong to me. In fact, I don't
think I've ever seen siding put up any other way. Could it be someone
misunderstood? Perhaps the recommendation was not to put 2 nails in one board
(vertically that is)....
Also, if you try to put in one nail above the underlying board, when you hit it
the final blow there's a high chance of splitting the clapboard since there's
nothing under it to support it.
-mark
|
114.266 | nail through 2 boards = 2 nails per board | CRLVMS::BLACK | Andrew P. Black | Tue Aug 27 1991 11:42 | 44 |
| > I was surprised when you said earlier notes (and manufactures) recommended
> only driving nails though one board so I reread all the replies (including
> one I wrote 3 years ago) and still say that sounds wrong to me. In fact, I
> don't think I've ever seen siding put up any other way. Could it be
> someone misunderstood? Perhaps the recommendation was not to put 2 nails
> in one board (vertically that is)....
I was surprised too. What I got out of reading the previous replies to
this note is that, assuming one nails every board
nailing through two pieces of siding == putting two nails in each board,
one above the other
Let's try the diagram.
|----/_// /|
/ / |
/ /_ |
|----/_// /|
/ / |
/ /_ |
|----/_// /|
/ / |
/ / |
/_/ |
It makes sense to me that this will promote splitting, since the width of
the board changes as it absorbs moisture, while the distance between the
nails stays the same.
But it also makes sense that doing what I've done, and nailing through the
center of the boards, promotes cupping.
> Also, if you try to put in one nail above the underlying board, when you
> hit it the final blow there's a high chance of splitting the clapboard
> since there's nothing under it to support it.
Yes, I noticed this too.
So, now that we understand the problem -- what's the solution
Andrew
|
114.267 | | ASDS::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Tue Aug 27 1991 15:40 | 5 |
| If you're looking for a solution to the existing situation, I don't have one
unless you consider pulling out the old nail, filling in the holes and
renailing. ugh...
-mark
|
114.268 | Renailing *how* ? | CRLVMS::BLACK | Andrew P. Black | Wed Aug 28 1991 10:32 | 9 |
|
> ... filling in the holes and renailing. ...
Renailing *how* ? With two nails per board? Why will that be better
than renailing with *three* nails per board, which I could do just by
*adding* another nail?
Andrew
|
114.269 | | FLOWER::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Tue Sep 03 1991 16:04 | 9 |
| My suggestion......nail with 5P Hot Dipped Galvenized nails ;1 inch
up from the bottom of the board into each stud. Nails on end, 1 inch in.
Re-nail boards that you have installed,and hope for the best OR remove
the stuff and start over.
Marc H.
|
114.270 | | FLOWER::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Tue Sep 03 1991 16:05 | 5 |
| Re: .14
Those are box nails...by the way.
Marc H.
|
114.534 | | R2ME2::BENNISON | Victor L. Bennison DTN 381-2156 ZK2-3/R56 | Mon Sep 09 1991 14:15 | 4 |
| I'm putting V-grove up on my sloped porch ceiling, horizontally. Does
it matter if the tongues point up the slope or down the slope?
- Vick
|
114.535 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Mon Sep 09 1991 15:10 | 4 |
| Practically speaking, I doubt it. In theory at least I'd guess the
tongues ought to be uphill, so any water that leaks in will not get
caught in the grooves (though of course your roof will never leak!).
|
114.536 | Start at the bottom | REGENT::BENDEL | | Mon Sep 09 1991 15:35 | 5 |
| It's easier to start at the bottom of the pitch, with the tongue
pointing up, and then install row after row working up. This way
your sliding the groove over the previous tongue, and the boards will
lay in place better while you nail. Does it matter ? Shouldn't, because
it's all inside anyway, right ?
|
114.537 | | R2ME2::BENNISON | Victor L. Bennison DTN 381-2156 ZK2-3/R56 | Mon Sep 09 1991 17:03 | 9 |
| Unfortunately, because there is a brickwork chimney at the top of the
slope, I think I will have to start there and work down. Or maybe it's
just my inexperience that's making me say that. When I get to the last
board, will I be able to scribe it and fit it in? It would have to be
scribed, as otherwise the tongue would show. It wouldn't actually be the
last board, either, as I need to carry the boards around the corners of
the chimney, if you understand what I'm saying.
- Vick
|
114.538 | | SALEM::PAGLIARULO_G | Reality is a cosmic hunch | Tue Sep 10 1991 09:41 | 27 |
| re .23
Why does it matter whether you start at the bottom or top? Either
way you can have the tongue exposed. Or am I missing something?
Whether you start at the top or bottom there are different
concerns. Either way, unless you're real lucky, the last board is going
to have to be scribed and cut. It might be less noticable at the top of
the slope rather than at the bottom. If you do start at the bottom figure
out beforehand the space you'll be left with when you get to the chimney.
If you're left with a 3/4" space between the board and the chimney it
doesn't leave you a lot of room to scribe anything. If there's not
enough space then you probably will have to scribe the first board to
give you a larger space at the chimney.
_________________________________________
| |make sure there is enough space here
| chimney |to scribe the next board
|___________|V
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
George
|
114.539 | Either way will work! | REGENT::BENDEL | | Tue Sep 10 1991 10:30 | 31 |
| re .25 why do you have to start at the bottom
As I said earlier, you don't have too, but "I think" it's easier. An
exagerated (ooh, sp?) example of the point I was trying to make
would be sheathing a roof with a steep pitch. It would be much easier
(to me) to nail down the lowest board first (plywood, whatever), then
when you set the next one on top it will slide into place and sit there
easier then if you had to push it up against a higher board ? (did I
explain that at all or confuse you ?) But you're right, you can work
either way. I just did the upstairs of a cabin the same way that is
being asked about here, and by working bottom up my wife could easily
hold one end of the board in place, while I snugged and nailed from the
other end. I doubt if she could have "pushed it into position and held
it ther without some trouble.
As far as having to work top down because of the obstacles, you
would only have to cut back about an extra 3/8" (notch deeper, where
you're fitting around the obstacle), and you'll be able to slide the
board in. But you may be able to or even want to apply trim boards
around the edges of the job to conceal any cracks or imperfect fits,
so the fit may not have to be "perfect". In case you haven't thought
about it, you'll have to leave a little clearance on the last board
so that you will have room to get it on the tongue, so a molding may
be best.
One thing I did, I tried to cut the first board so that the last
board would end close to the same width as the first. I also cut
45 degree bevels on the ends where two boards would overlap, so that
if they dried/shrunk I wouldn't be looking at my insulation.
Enjoy, I think it's a fun job, and it'll look good I'm sure !
Steve
|
114.540 | | ELWOOD::LANE | | Tue Sep 10 1991 13:47 | 7 |
| I'd start at the bottom and let gravity help rather than hinder. Point the
tongues up. When you get to the top at either the ceiling or the fireplace,
cut the back part of the grove away so the board just lays in place instead
of being fitted over the tongue of the preceeding board. Use an extra nail
or two to hold it there.
Mickey.
|
114.541 | | R2ME2::BENNISON | Victor L. Bennison DTN 381-2156 ZK2-3/R56 | Tue Sep 10 1991 14:48 | 6 |
| Thanks, everyone, for all the good tips. I think I have a plan now.
- Vick
P.S. I think I asked my first question about finishing this porch
about three years ago in this notesfile. Slow but steady. :^)
Well, mostly just slow. :^)
|
114.542 | | SALEM::PAGLIARULO_G | Reality is a cosmic hunch | Tue Sep 10 1991 18:37 | 7 |
| re .26
Ahha, got it. The way I read your reply I thought you were saying
that the only way to have the tongue exposed was to start at the
bottom. That's why it didn't make sense to me.
George
|
114.199 | Clapboard alignment? | HDECAD::THOMAS | Stop, look and listen | Tue Nov 12 1991 11:50 | 8 |
| My house is in the process of being resided with red cedar clapboards.
After 15 years, the old masonite siding was rotting badly. Anyway, my
question is this. Should the clapboards on each side of the house line
up with one another? I noticed that on my garage, the contractor did
not get good alignment between the front and the side. That is to say
the bottom edges of the clapboards on the front don't line up perfectly
with those on the side. Is this normal or is it a sign of poor
workmanship?
|
114.200 | Make 'em do it right | ELWOOD::LANE | | Tue Nov 12 1991 11:58 | 5 |
| I'd say that they should line up at the corners. It's not that hard to do
unless you are working on such a small section that the "adjustments" look
worse than the mismatched corners.
Mickey.
|
114.201 | | FLOWER::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Tue Nov 12 1991 12:44 | 5 |
| I'll also vote for the "line up around the corner". When I put
clapboards on my addition,I used a 1x3 furring board to help transfer
the dimensions from one side to another(also called "story board").
Marc H.
|
114.202 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Nov 12 1991 14:21 | 1 |
| Of course they ought to line up at the corners!
|
114.203 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-04/S23 -- dtn 381-2684 | Mon Dec 09 1991 15:16 | 21 |
| > ... Should the clapboards on each side of the house line
> up with one another? ...
Functionally it makes no difference.
Aesthetically some will never notice and others will think it is
obvious and looks terrible.
If you're using wood siding it is common to vary the spacing
slightly to match up with the tops and bottoms of doors and
windows. (This can make for a better, more weathertight job of
flashing these openings.) So if different sides of the house have
different height doors and windows it might be hard to line up the
siding on all sides.
Other than that, I'd say that failure to line up at corners is a
pretty good indication of sloppy workmanship. I'd worry that it
might indicate other, functional problems with the installation.
For [most?] aluminum and vinyl siding the spacing doesn't vary, so
if the bottom course is at the same level on all sides the all the
courses should always line up.
|
114.204 | use a guage to space your clapboards. | SENIOR::HAMBURGER | No, no! The OTHER reverse! | Tue Dec 10 1991 15:05 | 21 |
|
If you're using wood siding it is common to vary the spacing
slightly to match up with the tops and bottoms of doors and
windows. (This can make for a better, more weathertight job of
flashing these openings.) So if different sides of the house have
different height doors and windows it might be hard to line up the
siding on all sides.
>>>One trick to hanging clapboards is to make a guage that is scrap 1x4
pine, about 8-10" long. Cut notches in one edge to match up with the exact
exposure you want the clapboards to have. As you hang them, you hold the
guage under the previous board and drop the next into the notch to give you
exactly the same exposure as the last. If you lined up the bottom of the
boards around the corner with the side you are working on, then you should
keep even with the boards all the way up, although you should check every
2-3 layers.
Another hint, keep using your level every 2-3 layers even with the guage.
Otherwise you will end up with boards that are not level.
Vic
|
114.119 | 'pends which side ya mean... | ESKIMO::CASSIDY | Mission: Repair with care. | Wed Dec 11 1991 05:41 | 14 |
|
This was over a year ago, but there was discussion about
cedar shingles expanding or shrinking. The answer is simple...
both. The shingles on the north side, which never see the sun,
will expand. All the other sides (three, usually) will shrink.
I was also told that you should always use exactly TWO
nails per shingle. That's for every shingle, small or large,
except the one that goes at the peak. For there, you are only
allowed to use one. Can't say as I know why this is important
but the inspector who told me this was very firm about this
point.
Tim
|
114.393 | Quarter size hole in cedar clapboards | FDCV06::BAKSTRAN | | Mon Feb 17 1992 11:20 | 6 |
| Our house is not even a year old, and we've noticed a quarter
size hole, in one of the cedar clapboards on the outside of
our house. We called an exterminator to look at it today, but
I wondered if anyone had any ideas?
|
114.394 | Woodpeckers? | NEST::JRYAN | | Mon Feb 17 1992 11:46 | 6 |
| I found that woodpeckers are responsible for two quarter-to half dollar
size holes in the trim boards of my house. Have you ever answered the
knock at the door and found no one there?
:')
JR
|
114.395 | hahaha | FDCV07::BAKSTRAN | | Mon Feb 17 1992 13:43 | 5 |
| :-)....hahah. I thought of that, but I don't remember hearing
any noise. Would they be out in the winter? Weirdest thing!
I'll have to keep my eyes peeled for "woody the woodpecker".
|
114.396 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Mon Feb 17 1992 14:38 | 1 |
| I heard a woodpecker on Saturday, so they're definitely around in the winter.
|
114.397 | Fly away birdies | FDCV07::BAKSTRAN | | Mon Feb 17 1992 15:24 | 3 |
| How do you get rid of them... I mean other than the obvious, rifle!
|
114.398 | STARLING also | REFDV1::CALDERA | | Mon Feb 17 1992 15:27 | 10 |
| STARLING are also house attackers, it was the crazyest think, why they
chose to peck where they did, just on th eside of the house not in
corner, or a peak but 4 feet from anything, just started digging away.
They could be telling us of a bigger problem "BUGS" in the wood. Why
else would they attack a flat wall of wood.
Paul
|
114.399 | simple test | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Mon Feb 17 1992 15:28 | 6 |
| try stuffing something (old newspaper, etc...) into the hole. If it is
gone the next day you will know that you have tenants. Of course you
may need to wait until hibernation season is over.
If there are no tenents seal the hole permanently. If ther are
tenants make sure that you evict them first, (unless you like the musty
smell of small rodents decaying in your walls.)
|
114.400 | New House | FDCV07::BAKSTRAN | | Mon Feb 17 1992 16:07 | 5 |
| The strange part is its a brand new house, not even a year old yet.
That's why the thought of bugs in the wood seems so odd.
We'll see what the exterminator says.
|
114.401 | Carpenter bees | CSOA1::MCCULLOUGH | | Tue Feb 18 1992 09:30 | 21 |
| Carepnter Bees will eat holes in cedar. We found several last year.
You will probably find sawdust directly beneath the hole. The holes are
perfectly round.
Usually the Cedar siding is finished with some type of preserver which
the bees don't seem to like.
If you have a bee inside you might be able to hear it eating, kind of a
crunching sound.
I sprayed some of the Wasp/Hornet spray into a hole and a few minutes
later one rather large and somewhat dazed bee cvame out to meet his
doom.
Good luck
Mike
|
114.402 | I'll ask a dumb question | VSSCAD::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie | Tue Feb 18 1992 12:39 | 9 |
| I'm interested in the fact that this is a new house. In new construction, with
kiln-dried wood, you shouldn't have an infestation so fast, unless you had a
colossal leak causing a wet area behind the siding, or the siding was garbage to
begin with (i.e. already rotting or buggy).
I confess I don't know much about cedar clapboards, but could it be a knot that
has popped out?
Elaine
|
114.403 | Hemlock or Cedar siding? | DATABS::ROYAL | | Thu Mar 19 1992 13:37 | 13 |
|
I'm currently in the early stages of building a home and am trying to
make the decision to go with hemlock or cedar siding. In either case
it seems clear that the siding should be installed rough side out to
hold the paint better. The advantages that I've heard with hemlock
are that it's a bit cheaper and it won't bleed tanic acid (hence I
won't have to paint it in 3 years). Are there any advantages of cedar
over hemlock?
Thanks in advance.
-- Phil
|
114.404 | Cedar is much better | MSEE::TOWLE | Corky | Wed Mar 25 1992 10:57 | 10 |
| RE: .0
Hemlock shrinks, splits, warps, the knots fall out and it has quite a
proclivity to loosen any nail used to try and hold it in place provided you
don't split it in the first place when trying to drive the nail.
Hemlock also does not last and weather as well as Cedar.
Spend the money and get cedar. The clearer the better and you'll never have
to worry about it.
|
114.146 | CVG clapboard siding info needed | DATABS::ROYAL | | Fri Jun 26 1992 11:35 | 17 |
| Moved to here.
================================================================================
Note 4669.0 CVG clapboard siding info needed 1 reply
DATABS::ROYAL 12 lines 24-JUN-1992 12:10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm in the process of having a house built. Today a bunch of exterior
siding appeared on the job site. The label on each "bunch" of siding
said "Western Red Cedar Grade V" I guess I expected to read something
like "Red Cedar Grade A". It finally hit me that the "V" means
vertical (for vertical grain) and since the siding is clear (no knots)
that it must be clear vertical grain (or CVG). Does anyone know how
this compares to your standard Grade A red cedar siding?
Thanks in advance.
-- Phil
|
114.235 | Pressed Wood Siding help needed | BERTNI::HOWARD | | Wed Sep 02 1992 18:47 | 25 |
|
My home, and the exterior siding, is about 22 years old. The builders
user some sort of siding material that is made of pressed wood. Each
"clapboard" is about 10 inches wide and a half inch thick. Apparently
it is a popular building material as it is fast and cheap.
The trouble is that on one side of the house moisture seems to have
gotten in around the nail heads, and the siding is slowly expanding
(like a sponge) as the water enters.
The paint at the points where this is happening is starting to crack
allowing more moisure to enter. In a few places close to the ground
the siding is disintegrating.
I would like to avoid re-siding (or adding vinyl siding) now, and put it
off a couple years until I have the money to re-side (or vinyl side) the
whole house.
Has anyone worked with this pressed wood siding before? Is there a way
to preserve it longer with wood preservative and paint? What should I
patch the exposed points with?
Any suggestions would be appreciated!
John
|
114.236 | Why do they use that? | 16BITS::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Wed Sep 02 1992 21:36 | 6 |
| Sounds like that Masonite siding junk. Too bad.
Try any waterproof sealer and best of luck.
-Jack
|
114.76 | Another re-siding planning experience | STAR::FLIPIT::Philpott | Rob Philpott, DTN:381-1285, 603-881-1285, ZKO3-2/T16 | Thu Sep 03 1992 10:35 | 49 |
| Well, this note is a little old, but since I'm about to have my house
re-sided, I thought I'd throw in a couple of comments/questions. Earlier
replies suggest building a trough for stain dipping or using a PVC pipe.
The contracter I've lined up suggested something he saw on TOH. Buy 2 10'
sections of vinyl or aluminum gutter, join them together and cap the ends.
You're ready to dip. Since they're probably only about 4" deep, you have to
dip one edge, flip it over and dip the other side, But it'll be cheaper
than that length of PVC pipe. Plus, when you're done, if you need gutters
on the house...
Next comment... Reading all of the notes in here that have anything to do
with staining new siding was not as informative as I had hoped and left me
a bit uncertain what I wanted to do. Advice/opinions vary quite a bit
based on personal preferences and individual circumstances. But that's
okay - the info at least led me to ask more questions than I would have
thought of on my own. I'm still not sure whether to go with semi-solid or
solid stain. I'm told that after a couple of coats, solid stain CAN crack
and peel like latex paint - and I've seen this on my neighbor's house. But
it sounds like semi-solid doesn't last all that long, and I'm not really up
for re-staining every 3-4 years. My wife wants to consider a bleaching
oil/wood preservative...I've got to do more investigating on this topic.
As for the re-siding, we'll be going with A-Grade Rustic cedar (he claims
there will be NO knots), 4" exposure, nailing through both courses of
siding with stainless steel nails. Corner boards will be replaced as
needed with matching pine stock. I considered replacing trim with 5/4",
but since I'd have to get the power company to come out and disconnect the
power in order to replace one of the corner boards where the line connects
to the house, I dropped that idea fast.
I was quite shocked at the very wide range of estimates I received. After
asking a lot of questions to ensure apples-to-apples comparison, I still
could not account for the drastic differences. I guess some folks were
just a lot hungrier for business. The estimates I obtained were $7200,
$11,000, and $13,000! The low bid included replacing a kitchen window,
removing/repairing/re-installing a large family room window (sill rot), and
re-flashing a cricket where I have a water leak.
The $13000 bid did not include ANY of these things. It did include
back-priming, which accounted for about $1500 and it specified regular
A-grade (not "rustic"). He claims that's about $.02 to $.03 per linear
foot difference. At about 6600 ft for the job, that's only a couple hundred
bucks. The middle bid specified 4-1/2" exposure and a few other things
that made me question the quality of the work.
I've got references I trust on both the low and high bidder regarding their
work quality, so I'm taking the chance and going with the low bidder.
Anyone got any thoughts on other things that might cause the wide range of
estimates?
|
114.77 | you spec it | AKOCOA::CWALTERS | | Thu Sep 03 1992 11:11 | 28 |
|
Why don't *you* write a single specification and ask for bids
to the spec? It sounds like you're getting a wide range of prices
because you are asking builders to write/work to their own materials
& finish spec.
knowing nothing abuit US building methods, I bought a book called
"Building Wood Houses" (published by Sterling, $12-95) in Trendlines.
It's based on national codes and simply sets out the optimum materials
grades and applications for varying budgets. It tells you about
the different finish options, and I *think* it said something
about exterior solid stain lasting 8-10 years.
(I've found it almost as useful as the info in this file.)
Regards,
Colin
PS - just had a complete repaint after the original job 8 years ago.
The original material was Olympic solid stain. There was very little
cracking and peeling even on the extreme weather exposure. I reckon
if you went with primer & 2 topcoats over sawn siding you would
not need to repaint for many years.
|
114.405 | Masonite Siding???? | VIDEO::CIANCIOLO | | Wed Jan 13 1993 14:34 | 11 |
|
I am looking at a new house which has Masonite siding. Is this the
same as Insulite? I have seen other discussions of Insulite but
nothing on Masonite.
The builder says he has used it for twenty years now. Does anyone
have a house with Masonite or know of it's reputation?
Thanks for any help you can offer!
Chris
|
114.406 | Expect 15 years +/- for Masonite siding | ASD::GUDITZ | | Wed Jan 13 1993 15:36 | 12 |
| Most of the houses on my street originally had masonite siding. It's
an inexpensive siding. However, the useful life is about 15 years if
properly maintained to keep the moisture out(read frequent painting).
Once the moisture gets in, usually through the unpainted back side, the
masonite starts to delaminate and decompose. It will start to tear,
buckle, and bubble on the front surface. At this point it will be very
attractive to carpenter ants. Almost all of the houses on my street
have been resided with cedar or vinyl. The north and south sides seem
to wear the fastest. I resided mine with cedar at 16 years although it
should have been at about 12 years because it had not been maintained
before I bought it.
|
114.407 | paper sponge | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Thu Jan 14 1993 06:39 | 11 |
|
..DITO... Thats what was on my house. When I opened up the walls
I found several ant nests. The Masonite was starting to swell
from moisture and decompose. Under that was another sheet of a
black type fiber used for insulation. Needless to say I took it
down to the studs. Myself, I tend to stay away from it.
I'd go vinyl before Masonite.
JD
|
114.408 | So take care of it Properly!! | APACHE::DFIELD | | Thu Jan 14 1993 08:52 | 16 |
|
I have it on my new house. I have only had the house 9 months, so
I am not a good reference for long term performance. However, I
disagree with the previous notes. Cedar must be painted as often
if not more often than masonite to keep its color and protection.
Vinyl is more durable, but make sure you get someone to install it
correctly or it will buckle. Besides I hate the look of vinyl.
Cedar is much more costly than masonite and if you take care of
masonite it should not be a problem. My fathers apartment building
has had maasonite for 20+ years (Painted twice) with no problems.
Just my $ 0.02...
|
114.409 | add 2c more | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Fri Jan 15 1993 06:44 | 10 |
|
Rep:3
....most things will last some time if proper care is used....
FYI, the house was close to 20years old. I guess it lasted
good considering the original owner didnt do a thing to it...
I like Cedar myself, but DYI some times has a drawback on time so
I went with 5/8 T1-11 and stained it....
JD
|
114.410 | | VIDEO::CIANCIOLO | | Fri Jan 15 1993 17:19 | 9 |
|
Well, thanks for the information. I'm still not sure what I'm going
to do but it gives me alot of useful experience.
Thanks,
Chris
|
114.411 | | SOLVIT::REDZIN::DCOX | | Sat Jan 16 1993 07:13 | 50 |
| A horror story with a slightly different twist.....
About 12 years ago, my Sister had a new home built; they used Masonite
clapboard siding. It was new and touted as an inexpensive, but good
quality alternative to pine or cedar clapboards. Since her husband was
"in the trades", the resulting house was very well built; his father is
a contractor and they knew the builder to be a concientious person.
Her husband also is a stickler for keeping trim and siding well
protected with paint and caulking.
A slight, but important, tangent.....
Their boys developed allergies that seemed to get worse as they
grew older. Visits (many $$$) to allergists confirmed that mold was
the villian. The recommended fix, assuming they did not want to move
to a desert climate, was to spray the walls and carpets with a
"de-molder" (more $$$). The boys always felt better after each
time the house was treated, but it did not last long.
A few years ago, her husband noticed that one of the clapboards seemed
to be cracking along a grain. Since Masonite is essentially pressed
paper, it does not lend itself to cracking in ways that look like
grains. So, he pulled that one piece off. What he found was that the
BACK side of the Masonite was "mush". So he kept pulling off
clapboards and finding that the back sides of them were all mush. Keep
in mind that, from the outside, these clapboards looked virtually new.
He wound up taking all of the clapboards off the one side of the house
that is in shade 100% of the time.
Parenthetically, they insisted on putting CDX plywood instead of
particle board on the house before applying the clapboards. If
particle board had been under the rotted clapboards, it would also have
been "mush". Not surprisingly, the underlying plywood was coated with
mold. And, as you probably have guessed by now, that side of the house
is where the boys' bedrooms are.
They tried various methods of killing the mold. Bleach did about the
best, but not complete. It took over 2 years of exposure (rain, light,
air, whatever) after bleaching to kill off all the mold. Also not
surprisingly, the boys' allergies improved after the bleaching and
continued to diminish throughout the two years that the plywood siding
was exposed to the elements.
They now have pine clapboards.
Just a first hand, true story. You'll have to come to your own
conclusions about Masonite siding.
As always, FWIW
Dave
|
114.412 | | SAMUEL::MARRA | | Tue Jan 19 1993 12:13 | 15 |
| re .0 you didn't mention if the house was built yet or not. so...
We had the choice of Masonite, Cedar, or some relatively new material,
made by Luisianna Pacific. This new stuff looks like the chip board
that is used for siding, only it's wrapped in fibreglass and primed at
the factory. It is also given a finish that appears to look like
Cedar, only doesn't have the unevenness of cedar. It is also more
rigid and only requires blind nailing.
This stuff is great. I can get more information about it if anyone is
interested, I kept one of the installation sheets when it was
delivered.
.dave.
|
114.413 | Installing Cedar shakes over old shakes..... | EMDS::FRANKOSKY | | Tue May 18 1993 16:44 | 9 |
| I want to reside a house with new white cedar shakes. It already has an old
single layer of painted cedar shakes on it but these are worn and several
recent renovations have left several patched areas where doors and windows
used to be.
Is it necessary to remove the layer of old singles or can I lay a new layer
over them?????? If I can layer over, is there a best way of doing this????
thanks for the help.
|
114.414 | 1111.* | ESKIMO::CASSIDY | | Wed May 19 1993 02:18 | 6 |
| >>> is there a best way of doing this????
Perhaps the first place you could look is in the (really
convenient) directory this conference uses. Type DIR 1111.*
to view it.
Tim
|
114.415 | An experience | MPGS::MASSICOTTE | | Wed May 19 1993 08:51 | 22 |
|
Back a few years a siding contractor from the springfield area
did a few houses in my old neighborhood. The houses were low
cost ones put up during the Korean conflict. Mine had cedar
shakes.
Anyway, this guy came in and we listened to his song'n dance
routine and got a price to cover the shakes. After he'd
left, I called a bldg contractor friend, told him the story
and he said "Hell, that's no bargain, I can do that for you."
The asked, "What kind of siding do you have now?" Told him
and his reply was: "You want to cover up CEDAR?" That's outlast
the rest of the house! Have the old paint "high pressure" vapor
blasted off and re-paint or stain it."
There wasn't but maybe 3 coats of paint on it anyway, so we
elected to paint it one more time and sold the place a year later.
But that's what "A friend" in the business, said.
Fred
|
114.147 | Finger jointed pine clapboards | KEPNUT::GAGNON | | Mon Aug 16 1993 17:18 | 22 |
|
In trying to reduce the price of building a house, the builder has
suggested using pine clapboards instead of cedar. He showed me
some sample pieces, and showed me that each board was made up of
many short (10 inches or so) pieces of finger jointed pine.
He claims that because of this, the pine will not tend to "cup"
as it would with just one long piece. I guess the theory is that
the direction of the grain can change every 10".
Has enyone used this product ??
Is it new to the market, or has it been around long ??
Does it hold up as well as cedar...or at least better than
regular pine or hemlock ??
I'd hate to save money now, and re-side in 5 years.
Thanks, Ken Gagnon
|
114.148 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Tue Aug 17 1993 10:35 | 10 |
| Re: .5
I would use cedar...period. Penny wise/pound foolish is approriate
here.
With the cost of labor high, why fool around?
By the way, good quality cedar does not cup.
Marc H.
|
114.416 | Caulking under clapboards... | VMSNET::G_CHANG | TheFaceOfADragonFlyIsNothingButEyes! | Thu Sep 09 1993 09:49 | 18 |
| Need some quick advice:
Live in Atlanta, GA area...my brother is painting his house. It has
wood siding (clapboards or whatever).
Someone told him to caulk under all the clapboards if the builder
didn't do it when the house was built. I don't know if this is for
insulation or termite infestation prevention. He is about half way
done and someone else told him No don't do that! Something with
the house and breathing and humidity.
Do any of you know anything about caulking between the wood siding of
your house? Is it done or not and why?
Thanks!
--Gina
|
114.417 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Sep 09 1993 09:53 | 7 |
| Don't do that! This will greatly accellerate the rotting of the siding and
perhaps even the sheathing and other structural members. If the clapboards
are installed properly, they will be weathertight.
Caulking around doors and windows is a good idea.
Steve
|
114.418 | Some houses have had holes *drilled* under clapbds | SOLVIT::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Thu Sep 09 1993 09:58 | 10 |
| Yes Gina, there is no way that the clapboards should be caulked
underneath. It is imperative that any water vapor that finds its way out
that far from inside the house be able to escape. If not, you'll have
terrible paint peeling problems or at worst, wood damage. The
clapboards will keep the water out of your house just fine the way
they were installed. Remember, the ONLY vapor barrier that you should
have should be as close to the inside of the house as possible. Any
vapor that makes it inside the wall *needs* to be able to get out!
Kenny
|
114.419 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Thu Sep 09 1993 11:16 | 6 |
| RE: .1
Agreed...this makes *NO* sense at all. Remove the caulk or you will
have future problems.
Marc H.
|
114.420 | | 16BITS::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Thu Sep 09 1993 13:37 | 5 |
| re: .0
How many "Don't do it"s would you like?
-Jack
|
114.421 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 | Thu Sep 09 1993 15:39 | 5 |
| I suspect somebody may have been suggesting, "caulk under the BOTTOM
clapboard, at the top of the foundation" and it got misunderstood
somewhere along the line as "caulk under all the clapboards."
As said before...how many "NO!" responses do you want?
|
114.364 | Go Latex right from the Start? | AIMHI::LONGLAND | | Thu Sep 09 1993 17:13 | 16 |
|
Since the title of the base note really reflects my concern, I will
enter this inquiry here.
I am in need of 'applying some finish' to our red cedar clapboards
now that they have been on the house about 1 1/2 years. I am hearing
that linseed oil [semi-transparent] stains often have problems with
mildew. As much as I would like to keep the color as close to natural
as possible, I see my plans fading from CWF to Semi-Transparent, to
Semi-Solid to..well, you see where we're headed. Should I go with a
Latex Solid stain right off the bat?
I figure the folks who stained a few years back might have some
thoughts. Any ideas appreciated.
Steve
|
114.422 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Sep 09 1993 22:04 | 5 |
| I've seen this question asked in advice columns from time to time
(always with the same "No!" response), so it does seem to be an
idea that pops up with some frequency.
Steve
|
114.365 | Red cedar tone or other? | MPGS::MASSICOTTE | | Fri Sep 10 1993 08:14 | 4 |
|
What do you wish to obtain after the stain is applied?
Fred
|
114.366 | Once latex, always latex | VICKI::DODIER | Food for thought makes me hungry | Fri Sep 10 1993 09:38 | 10 |
| I painter I knew said he preferred oil finishes over latex ones. He
said they typically went on easier and lasted longer. In this
particular case he was talking about paint though, so I don't know if
the same applies to stain.
One thing I do know, once you go with latex you cannot go back to
oil (i.e. cannot cover latex with oil). You can however cover an oil
finish with latex.
Ray
|
114.423 | Oh !@$# | VMSNET::G_CHANG | TheFaceOfADragonFlyIsNothingButEyes! | Fri Sep 10 1993 10:56 | 13 |
| Thank you all for the resounding NO!
I will pass the info on to my brother, he'll be bummed. This makes
sense, and I think that one of the responses was correct in thinking
that "Caulk the BOTTOM board only" got translated to something else.
My brother says he was going on the advice he got from HOME DEPOT.
Hmmmm wonder if they needed to move their inventory of caulk that day
or something.
Thanks again!
--Gina
|
114.367 | Can I have my cake & eat it too?? | AIMHI::LONGLAND | | Fri Sep 10 1993 11:33 | 7 |
|
I guess what I am looking for is: 1) Retain the color as best I can
2) Have it still look like wood (which I guess means, let some degree
of grain (along with imperfections and color variations) sho through.
BUT, I do not want to [temporarily] achieve this at the expense of
having to steam-clean mildew and restain/paint in 2 or 3 years.
|
114.424 | | SOLVIT::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Fri Sep 10 1993 12:01 | 10 |
|
I always have to laugh at 'advice' given out in places like lumber
stores, hardware stores, auto parts stores, etc. Of course these people
are NOT trained in applying the profession they are selling items for.
So you have to figure that asking them *what* to do is no better than
asking anybody else. Now, if you want to ask them *about* what they are
selling, that may be different. (one would assume at least *some*
knowledge about the product they sell - but again, not necessarily)
Kenny
|
114.368 | Go with oil stain. Latex stain can actually PEEL! | SOLVIT::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Fri Sep 10 1993 12:07 | 18 |
| .10 is right about what can go over what. However, if you use latex
*anything* over red cedar, the red oils in the cedar wood *will* bleed
through the latex. This is not a problem with oil.
With stains, you definitely want an oil based one. Thompsons or
Olympic are both good, but there are many others. Almost all paints and
stains of ANY quality have anti-mildew additives in them and it will
say so right on the can. There is little or no difference in the
inherent ability of oil or latex based paints or stains to resist
mildew.
So my suggestion is to go with an oil based stain in semi transparent
unles you wish to change the color drastically (Especially to a much
lighter shade than the wood is now). Most of the oil based stains out
now can be cleaned with soap and water until they dry. (They have a water
emulsifier in them)
Kenny
|
114.369 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | DENVER A Long Way | Fri Sep 10 1993 12:52 | 9 |
| I've used Pratt & Lambert semi-transparent stains and never had any
mildew problems ... It mentions that it contains fungicides for mildew
resistance.
As to the latex over oil / oil over latex ... as I understand it, with
modern paints and stains, as long as you've done good surface prep, it
hardly matters any more.
Stuart
|
114.425 | | REFINE::MCDONALD | shh! | Fri Sep 10 1993 13:51 | 9 |
|
... which actually isn't the "usual" case for Home Depot. They
employ many professionals per store and provide frequent training
for professionals and non-professionals.
... which is one of the reasons they have a habit of putting places
like HQ and Builder's Square out of business.
|
114.426 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | DENVER A Long Way | Fri Sep 10 1993 14:30 | 6 |
| Even the caulking the bottom clapboard is incorrect ... that will guarantee
a rotten lower clapboard. You've got to caulk the wall to foundation joint
which may be under or concealed by the bottom clapboard. It is common
to caulk that joint on the INSIDE.
Stuart
|
114.370 | all in the mix | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Mon Sep 13 1993 08:17 | 14 |
|
rep:-
"good surface prep, it harly matters any more."
Wellllll...... I'd like to say yes....but I'd hate to find out
you've done the entire house and next year find it pealing because
the "prep", wasnt correct....:)
I used Thompson's on my T1-11 and havnt see any problems. A slight
discoloration where the water has been hitting, but no mold. Even on
the North side where its damp.. Next year i'll give it a quick shot
of clear.
JD
|
114.371 | | AIMHI::BOWLES | | Mon Sep 13 1993 09:58 | 10 |
| Our house is cedar clapboards. The trim is spruce. All was "painted"
with oil-based stain (Cabot's).
We have a slight bit of mildew where the water splashes up from the
deck. The rest of the house is above grade, so we get no splashing
there at all. The mildew is barely noticable, and only on the white
stain. Since the rest of the house is stained with grey, we wouldn't
see it anyway!
Chet
|
114.372 | | RCFLYR::CAVANAGH | Jim Cavanagh SHR1-3/R20 237-2252 | Tue Sep 14 1993 10:04 | 6 |
|
You can also buy a mildewcide additive at most paint/hardware stores. You
just add this little bottle to a gallon of paint/stain (about $2.50 a bottle)
and mix it in. I used it on my house this summer when I repainted with
California Storm stain (oil based).
|
114.373 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Sep 14 1993 10:15 | 6 |
| Re: .16
That's a waste of money, in most cases, as paints and stains have
mildewicide added by the manufacturer.
Steve
|
114.374 | | RCFLYR::CAVANAGH | Jim Cavanagh SHR1-3/R20 237-2252 | Tue Sep 14 1993 12:24 | 13 |
| >>That's a waste of money, in most cases, as paints and stains have
>>mildewicide added by the manufacturer.
In most cases, but not mine. My house had a pretty bad case of mildew on
the north and west (heavily shaded) sides. I used a stuff called Jomax to
clean the house (what a difference that made!!) and then stained with the
addition of the mildewcide.
I'll let you know how well it works/worked....next year! :^)
|
114.375 | "Life's a Bleach" | CADSYS::FLEECE::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie | Tue Sep 14 1993 12:34 | 15 |
| Mildewcide can't prevent growth of mildew in an extremely wet area. If your
house is shaded by tall trees, if plants and shrubs are too close to the house,
or if you have an internal moisture problem in the house, there isn't much you
can do to prevent mildew from re-appearing, even with the use of added
mildewcide. (Don't ask me how I know this).
Some problems can be fixed by thinning tall trees, moving plantings away from
the siding.
If you are in a really damp area, you might want to look into the high quality
wood finishes developed for log homes (LANDO::LOG_HOMES). As was mentioned
elsewhere in this conference, they are expensive, but they will protect your
home.
Elaine
|
114.376 | It's not moisture...it's just water! :^) | RCFLYR::CAVANAGH | Jim Cavanagh SHR1-3/R20 237-2252 | Wed Sep 15 1993 11:48 | 11 |
|
Thanks for the input. I don't have any trees or shrubs next to the house,
the closest is about 15 feet away. I do however live next to a swamp! Gee...
do you think *that* could cause some dampness?? :^)
I'll wait and see how well this stuff works, and if it doesn't...well, then
I'll look into the $$$ alternatives!
|
114.427 | New exterior clapboard siding (woodchips)? | NPSS::WADE | Network Systems Support | Wed Mar 23 1994 12:47 | 13 |
|
Has anyone had experience with a wood product clapboard siding made by
Georgia Pacific? Its been out for about 2 years and is called LP
inner seal lap siding. Its made from wood chips and an epoxy resin, is
pre-primed and it has a 25 year warranty.
The builder states that red cedar is a thing of the past and this is
the greatest thing since ....
|
114.428 | old foogie! | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Wed Mar 23 1994 14:32 | 7 |
| Old school of thought......
wood and glue left out in the rain melts....
....and for 25yrs???
|
114.429 | Red cedar a thing of the past? Yup! Future too! | MPGS::MASSICOTTE | | Wed Mar 23 1994 15:20 | 8 |
|
Quoting the "Lindal Cedar Homes" catalog, there are cedar structures
still standing after 1000 years. If I think of it tonite, I'll
get the exact quote.
Fred
|
114.430 | Cedar is great! | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Thu Mar 24 1994 06:37 | 4 |
|
The Cedar yes...but the glue I dont know.........
JD
|
114.431 | | TOOK::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Thu Mar 24 1994 09:39 | 6 |
| What would be the point of installing a manmade product warranted for 25 years
when you could use a natural wood product with a lifetime which is virtually
immeasureable?
-Jack
|
114.432 | | NPSS::WADE | Network Systems Support | Thu Mar 24 1994 09:53 | 17 |
|
The main reason is $$$$ but I don't want to put garbage on the side my
new house that's why I'm asking here. I did some more checking and its
basically pine chips that are epoxied together. When you give it more
thought, why would anyone do this, plain pine clapboards would be
better and would probably be about the same price?
We're checking with the builder to get the price differential on the
red cedar clear/smooth clapboard. And, we'll eliminate some extras if
we have to inorder to get the cedar.
I checked at Sommerville lumber and they quoted $.50/foot and they give
you the option of pre-priming for an extra charge. I'm checking the
price to keep the builder honest. Anyone have coverage numbers for
figuring approximate linear feet of clapboard per sq foot house side?
Thanks
|
114.433 | some info sources | SMURF::WALTERS | | Thu Mar 24 1994 10:41 | 25 |
|
I guess it can depend if you don't plan to live there for more than a
few years - it could be a big initial cost saver. The warranty is only
any good if it covers both replacement *and* reinstallation.
As a big part of the cost of siding is installation, a longer-lasting
product would save you a lot of money if you plan to live there the
rest of your life. Like the previous notes say, well-maintained cedar
can last for a long time.
If you decide to save the money, what you may want to do is check
whether this product has a Forest Products Laboratory certification.
They test the products under extreme conditions that would accelerate
normal deterioration. This would include things like UV light
deterioration, which is one of the big problems with resin-based
products.
Another thing to look into is how well this product "breathes". I've
read that for some manufactured siding, vapor doesn't travel
out of the wall easily and can reduce the efficiency of the insulation.
The FHA publishes some information about the properties of various
manufactured systems.
Colin
|
114.434 | | REDZIN::COX | | Thu Mar 24 1994 12:42 | 21 |
| Twenty years ago, Epoxy Glue Partical/Chip Board under Masonite clapboards was
touted as the way to go; low price, etc, etc. Against the advice of his
father_the_contractor, my brother-in-law had that combination installed on his
new house, primarily to save money. Over the years, water had swollen the
masonite and broken down the glue binding together the chips in the partical
board. The resulting mold was so severe that the family was suffering from
severe allergy reactions whenever anyone slept in the rooms at the side of the
house. After 15 years, one side (perpetually shady side) of the house had to
have all clapboard and partical boards removed; cut down trees so sunlight
could get in and help kill all of the mold (bleach, etc, was not enough). It
just was not worth it.
From a first hand perspective, I used the epoxy chip board as a raised floor (
not in contact with the ground) a lawn shed. About 5 years later, it was
rotting from underneath.
I would not use partical/chip board nor Masonite.
But then, Just My Opinion.....
Dave
|
114.78 | | NPSS::WADE | Network Systems Support | Thu Mar 24 1994 13:11 | 9 |
| I'll be using red cedar clapboard on my new house. Sommerville lumber
quoted me a price of $.50/linear foot for 6" clear red cedar. They
also suggested pre-installation priming option that they have
available. My plan is to go this route with hot dipped galvanized nails
and save on the staining by doing it myself next spring.
Any problems going this route?
|
114.79 | Galvanized nails do bleed | BOBSBX::CHIQUOINE | Who audits the IRS? | Thu Mar 24 1994 13:28 | 7 |
| re .32
You may want to consider stainless steel nails if you're using
a non-solid stain. The galvanized nails will eventually bleed
black.
Ken
|
114.80 | Stainless Nails won't Rust | N6331A::STLAURENT | | Thu Mar 24 1994 13:44 | 13 |
| Save yourself some grief and install with stainless ring-shank
nails, they're expensive ($4-5 lb.) but will never rust. This is a must
on a clear finish, not so sure if you go with a solid color. Anyone else
have experience with nail rust on solid color stains. I'd guess it would
depend on the quality of the stain and the coverage.
Galvanized nails have good holding power but you damage the finish
banging them in and rust is inevitable when they're exposed to the
elements. Stainless is a small price to pay for peace of mind.
/Jim
|
114.435 | three years later and my fears may be coming true | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | Back to BASICs | Fri Mar 25 1994 05:52 | 15 |
| >>I would not use partical/chip board nor Masonite.
A LOT of the new houses around here (Nashua/Merrimack NH) are using the Masonite
siding. My house has it and I can see several places where it appears water
has already swelled the edges. I can also see mold on a few damp areas.
This spring I will be doing a more extensive exam of these areas and see what
is going on. The house is three years old.
I questions the builder (Ashwood Homes) on the use of this and they came back
with "oh its much better than the cedar siding you get these days". I recall
asking "how much more for real wood siding?" and being very surprized when they
told me (don't recall the number though).
bjm
|
114.436 | | HDLITE::FLEURY | | Fri Mar 25 1994 06:55 | 9 |
| re: .5
You will need at least 3 linear feet of ceder for each square foot of
coverage. This leaves the usual 4" exposure. Depending upon the
amount of total square footage you need, and whether you want the
"rustic A" look, you shoul dbe able to get ceder between $.41 and $.45
per linear foot.
Dan
|
114.437 | | FREBRD::POEGEL | Garry Poegel | Fri Mar 25 1994 08:40 | 11 |
|
My 3.5 year old house with masonite siding is also showing signs of
swelling on the edges. It's only on the back of the house where it
gets the lease amount of sun. I did have some ice dam problems this
year and some water did get behind the siding. I wish I went with
cedar.
Home Depot is selling pre-primed cedar for $.59 a linear foot. I figured
it would cost about $1000 for 1 side of my house (34' long, 2 stories ).
Garry
|
114.438 | diff to masonite? | SMURF::WALTERS | | Fri Mar 25 1994 08:59 | 2 |
| I though Masonite was a different material to the woodchip/epoxy
material mentioned in .0?
|
114.439 | Masonite is different. | HDLITE::FLEURY | | Fri Mar 25 1994 11:42 | 7 |
| re: .11
Masonite is not the same as the composite material originally
mentioned. Masonite is essentially pressed paper and has very little
adhesive content.
Dan
|
114.440 | .45 l/f unprimed at HD | WMOIS::ECMO::SANTORO | Greg Santoro | Fri Mar 25 1994 12:40 | 40 |
| Home depot has primed cedar for .59 l/f but also has unprimed in bundles
8' bundel of ten = $36.00
12'bundle of ten = 54.00
that equals about .45 l/f (they also have other lengths)
I am in a similar situation. I have a 19 year old home that has pressboard
siding (essentially it is glorified particle board). The back of the house
that gets all the sun is peeling everywhere and needs a complete overhall.
On the left side of the house, almost every board is swollen so bad you can
see the waves. Front is actually in very good shape. Given the
composition of this stuff I'm surprised it lasted this long. The blue jays
even love it...they peck the hell out of it.
Every house on our block had it and I think I'm the last to consider
getting rid of it. We bought the house last year, it was built in '75.
If it is taken care of (ends sealed with water seal, board fully primed,
the proper sheathing, etc) I'm told it will last about 20 years...which is
about right considering our neighbors experience. I would have said that
if you were not planning to stay in the house you might get away with it
but after hearing the last few noters complain of problems after 2-3 years,
I'd be wary. However it might not be the same stuff.
My problem is that I will be in the house at most 5-7 years which is about
the limit 3 different painters told me the current siding might last with a
lot of repair/prep work and 2 coats of paint.
My question is...would you bite the bullet and do
1 - full cedar replacement (which we really can't afford),
2 - replace the bad sides with the same stuff and paint, or
3 - replace the bad sides with cedar and paint full
I'm consider 3 for now, with the only problem with mixing the cedar with
current is the exposure would be different, current is 5" and I'm told 4"
is max on cedar. Any thoughts?
Also, if anyone would like to trade off on a do-it-yourself job let me
know.
-Greg
|
114.441 | the real thing | JLOCKE::CALDERA | | Fri Mar 25 1994 13:06 | 12 |
| Use the real thing, it will be cheaper in the long run. I am in the
market for a house now and would facter in replacing all the siding
on a house before making an offer, if I knew it had pressed, compressed
glued whatever for siding. I have several houses on Cape Cod (a damp
climit) 2 of them are over 100 yr. old and the real wood is still holding
up. My brother has one with partical board 5 years old and everything
is swelling. Dampness and the elements are relentless in their attack
on wood, that is why glues finally break down.
Good luck,
paul
|
114.442 | | LEZAH::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Fri Mar 25 1994 13:27 | 4 |
| re: .13
You can (or could) get cedar siding in wider widths that would allow
5" to the weather. Of course, the wider stuff may cost more....
|
114.457 | Pine Clapboards - Preventative Maintenance? | GROOVE::DADDIECO | That's Just The Way It Is ..... | Fri Apr 22 1994 11:46 | 16 |
114.458 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Apr 22 1994 13:03 | 11 |
| You can do this, but make sure the sealer you use allows a finish on top of
it. Standard "Thompson's Water Seal" doesn't. I was at Home Depot this
morning looking at various clear sealer products and noted that Behr's
clear sealer specifically noted that it could be used to treat wood prior to
staining or painting and that it would aid adhesion. It waterproofs plus
resists fungus, rot and termites. Cuprinol and Olympic's products did not
appear to allow for paint/stain over and did not have the fungus or insect
preventative qualities. I didn't spot a Thompson's product to see what they
claimed.
Steve
|
114.459 | Dip don't Paint | HOCUS::RHODES | | Fri Apr 22 1994 14:39 | 4 |
| re -.1 I agree, Behr's is a good product. Instead of wasting time
painting the sealer, put it in a bucket large enough that you can dip
the shingles then flip them into a pile to air dry. Goes fast and
works great.
|
114.460 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Fri Apr 22 1994 14:42 | 3 |
| re .2:
He's using clapboards, not shingles.
|
114.461 | Sorry | HOCUS::RHODES | | Fri Apr 22 1994 14:44 | 3 |
| re: -.1 & -.2 Sorry read fast and make mistakes.
|
114.462 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Apr 22 1994 16:41 | 5 |
| Behr recommends dipping if possible (you could have a large trough, I
suppose) or "flood spraying" which is probably more practical. Be sure to
get the ends and edges as well.
Steve
|
114.463 | emporary trough | SMURF::WALTERS | | Fri Apr 22 1994 17:23 | 9 |
|
Depends on the length of the siding, but you can make a temporary
trough out of a couple of lengths of timber G-clamped across two
sawhorses.
Use a thick plastic sheet as the trough, stapled to the timbers
(Make sure the sheet rests on the ground). You can either pour in the
preservative or spray with a deck spray.
|
114.464 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Fri Apr 22 1994 17:27 | 2 |
| You might also be able to use plastic gutter, though it may be a little small
(i.e. you'll have to turn the clapboard it to get the whole thing).
|
114.465 | Spraying May be the Way to Go! | GROOVE::DADDIECO | That's Just The Way It Is ..... | Mon Apr 25 1994 13:27 | 12 |
114.466 | oil primer and good latex | ISLNDS::CARLBERG | | Mon Apr 25 1994 13:30 | 3 |
| I would just use an oil primer and paint with a good quality latex. We
did an old house with pine boards and it still looks good.
Mike
|
114.467 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Apr 25 1994 14:09 | 9 |
| Be sure to thoroughly wet all sides and edges of the siding. You may find it
best to lay out a big plastic sheet, lay the boards on that, and spray several
at a time, then flip them over and spray the other side. Wear skin and
eye protection (and, ideally, breathing protection) while you're doing this.
I'll be using the Behr sealer on a new cedar fence I'm having installed. I'll
soak the caps in it too.
Steve
|
114.468 | How to install new siding?? | SOLVIT::CASEY | | Fri Apr 29 1994 13:11 | 29 |
| I am planning on installing new cedar siding on my house however I
have some questions before I begin. I have checked other notes but I
have not found the answers.
1. With 6" siding what is the common exposure?? 4"? 3"?
2. When you start the first coarse I know you have to put some thing
under it so it looks like the rest of the siding what do you typically
use?? strips of � plywood??
3. I will have corner boards so to give the appropriate look I plan on
using 1x3" on one side and 1x4" on the other side so that when they
over lap both sides appear to be the same exposure and I plan on using
pine boards because I will be painting the house. Is this the correct
way of doing this?
4. When you have a joint with do boards should I do a bevel joint ie
|\| or just but them together??
5. When the siding meets the roof (for a dormer) should it just but
into it or is there a better way to do it.
6. What should I do for inside corners?? I have heard that you run a
piece of board in the corner and but the siding into it. Is this the
way to go?? how big should the boards be??
Thanks in advance
Tom Casey
|
114.469 | | LEZAH::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Fri Apr 29 1994 14:14 | 37 |
| Typically I think you'd do 4" exposure with 6" siding.
I'm not sure you need anything under the first course of siding.
I guess you could use a strip of 1/4" plywood or so, if you
want.
Your description of corners sounds okay to me. I might choose to
use slightly wider boards (1x5 and 1x6) but that's just personal
perference and what look you want.
Joints in the clapboards: doing a bevel joint with as much taper and
you can manage would definitely be the elegant way to do it.
For the sides of dormers, you'll want to leave a bit of space (1/2"?)
between the ends of the clapboards and the shingles. Step flashing for
the shingles has to go up under the clapboards. I'm not sure how
it's "supposed" to be done, but I'd be inclined to be sure I didn't
nail through the clapboards within, say, 4" of the roof so there would
be no problem inserting and removing flashing from under the edge of
the clapboards. I might even leave 1" space between the ends of the
clapboards and the roof to give more working room for inserting and/or
removing the step flashing at (re)roofing time.
For inside corners, get a square piece of 5/4 stock (i.e. a true 1"
square), put it in the corner, and butt the clapboards up to it from
both sides. I think 3/4" square would prove to be a little small, but
you could try it and see. For both inside and outside corners, put
some 15# felt paper around the corners so it's under the
cornerboard-to-clapboard joints, in case a little water gets
through.
Before you begin, lay out the whole wall from top to bottom, find
where the clapboard edges will come relative to the tops and bottoms
of windows and doors, and fudge the clapboard spacing so you don't
end up with inconvenient little strips, e.g. try to arrange it
so you can put a full clapboard right across the tops of the windows,
for instance, without notching. It will be easier, and look better.
|
114.545 | Using Shiplap outdoors | STRATA::SZEWCZYK | | Mon May 02 1994 21:58 | 5 |
| Does anyone know something about using rough cut shiplap outdoors?
I want to use it to make my pool deck a little more private.
It's a lot cheaper then pressure treated if you buy it from a mill.
Thanks,,,,,,,,,,,,Vic
|
114.546 | Spraying would be a good way to apply | TOOK::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Mon May 02 1994 22:09 | 11 |
| As it's rough cut, I'd use a good penetrating sealer on it first, and then
whatever you want for a final finish - paint, stain, whatever. You're going
to have to treat it somehow to weatherproof it and protect it from mold
and insects. While the above should do it, I wouldn't be adverse to giving
it a good treatment with Cuprinol or the like to start with.
The main thing is to use something very thin and penetrating at first so you
make sure you get all the exposed wood of the rough surface saturated with the
base product.
-Jack
|
114.547 | open to the air | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Tue May 03 1994 08:19 | 6 |
|
pretreating before installing is advised.....
You might consider putting a cap on the fence or wall you build also..
JD
|
114.470 | Cedar vs. Pine Clapboards | DOCTP::DOCTP::DIROCCO | | Thu May 05 1994 10:41 | 14 |
|
Cedar vs. Pine = ?$$$?
When re-clapboarding a house, what is best to use, pine or
cedar?? It will be painted, so I'm thinking since pine is
cheaper, that's the better route to go. Actually, we're not
doing the whole house just some sections.
??
Thanks,
Deb
|
114.471 | | MIYATA::LEMIEUX | | Thu May 05 1994 11:50 | 15 |
|
Whats on the house now?
If you re-side spend the money for the cedar you won't be sorry. I went
the cheapo pine route 12 years ago when I built my house. I have hated that pine
siding ever since the second year. (I even knew better but figured I didn't have
room in the budget) It's terrible stuff. Cedar is much more stable and is much
more resistant to the weather.
If you're patching, I suggest using the same material as the existing. If you
are going to do a whole side go with cedar or whatever.
Have fun!
Paul
|
114.472 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu May 05 1994 11:56 | 4 |
| Cedar is better. Properly maintained, it will last "forever". It also
looks nicer, even painted.
Steve
|
114.473 | We're gonna paint em... | DOCTP::DOCTP::DIROCCO | | Thu May 05 1994 14:15 | 12 |
|
We are going to paint. The house is old, and has probably been
'patched' here and there over the years, but I don't know what was
used before.
I guess I'll have to compare the costs. I saw bundles (10 per bundle)
at HD that were 6" x 6' for $27.00, that's roughly .45 cents per foot.
Hmmmm. I didn't check pine.
|
114.474 | check the grade | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Fri May 06 1994 08:09 | 4 |
|
keep in mind that there are different grades of ceader too.........
|
114.475 | Cedar, by all means | TOOK::ALBRIGHT | Born to DECserver | Fri May 06 1994 16:08 | 4 |
| Having owned both I vote CEDAR. Pine warps, splits, the knots tend to
ozze forever, yuk. Cedar is more uniform and has a better finish.
Loren
|
114.476 | | JOKUR::CRAMTB::MCCONNEY | I'm a M.D. = Music Director | Mon May 09 1994 13:42 | 4 |
| Whichever one you choose, be sure to paint BOTH sides. It protects
the wood from "cuping" if moisture gets underneath.
Chip
|
114.477 | dip 'em | CSLALL::NASEAM::READIO | A Smith & Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman Locks | Mon May 09 1994 13:51 | 16 |
|
Pick up a cheap plastic gutter (2 if you're using clapboards over 10' long)
and a couple of end caps.
They make great clapboard dipping trays. I did my whole house with 3" to
the weather cedar clapboards that I'd stained that way. (also had enough
to do the garage) I went through 20 gallons of stain if that gives you an
idea of how many clapboards I did.
I made a drying rack out of 4 2X4s laying against a wall. Every 1" there
was a finish nail for the clapboards to rest on.
Lay the clapboards face up on the nails to dry.
I was staining up to 20' clapboards that way.
|
114.478 | | GOOEY::WWALKER | hoonamana me bwango | Wed May 11 1994 10:28 | 14 |
| I recently went through the painful process of house hunting. The
pine siding on the houses we saw had cupped, warped, and checked after
10 years. The houses that had clear vertical grain cedar still looked
fine.
There are some acceptions to the rule, though. One house had pine
siding that was still in good shape, but it was obvious the owners had
done quite a bit of work to keep it that way. Another house with CVG
cedar was having some problems, though it was obvious the owners had
neglected it.
My 2 cents from my relatively small experience with the stuff,
Will
|
114.479 | | SMAUG::MENDEL | Welcome to the next baselevel | Wed May 11 1994 14:26 | 5 |
| Can anyone explain the concept of why putting the cedar "rough side up"
is better? I ask because this seems related, and I always wondered why
builders think that's better.
Kevin
|
114.480 | Rough Side = Better Surface to Apply Paint/Stain | GROOVE::DADDIECO | That's Just The Way It Is ..... | Wed May 11 1994 14:38 | 5 |
114.249 | Pressure washing exterior of House before re-staining | VMSSPT::PAGLIARULO | | Wed May 18 1994 08:53 | 12 |
| I need to re-stain my house. It has a solid color stain on it now that
is peeling. We just bought this house and when the inspector was going over it
(Paul Cornell) he mentioned that instead of scraping I could use a pressure wash
to remove the loose paint. Has anyone else done this? Does it work for paint
removal rather than just cleaning? I believe that it will blow off the loose
paint but what I'm concerned about is what the surface will look like
afterwards. Will the pressure wash also wear down the edges of the paint so
that I'm not left with ridges between the peeled and unpeeled areas?
Thanks,
George
|
114.250 | go for it | WIDGET::KLEIN | | Wed May 18 1994 11:53 | 5 |
| Pressure washing works great. I highly recommend it, especially before
re-staining. If you are worried, try it on a small area and decide whether
or not to continue.
-steve-
|
114.251 | power wash won't do | TUXEDO::MOLSON | Margaret Olson | Wed May 18 1994 11:59 | 9 |
| Oh, peeling exterior stain, what a pain. I know all about it.
You need to scrape, and scrape thoroughly. If you just power
wash, you are going to be doing it again next year, and the
year after, and the year after. You need to get every bit
of loose or slighly loose stain off. Then wash & prime &
restain.
Margaret.
|
114.252 | | VMSSPT::PAGLIARULO | | Wed May 18 1994 13:34 | 1 |
| ah....anyone want to break the tie? :-)
|
114.253 | scrape | TUXEDO::MOLSON | Margaret Olson | Wed May 18 1994 14:04 | 4 |
| The scraping doesn't remove the necessity to do wash - although if
you scrape a powerwash is overkill. My experience is that a
powerwash isn't sufficient if there is a peeling problem.
|
114.254 | Scraping rough side of Clapboards? | VMSSPT::PAGLIARULO | | Fri May 20 1994 09:13 | 10 |
| Don't know if this is a dumb question but it makes sense to me - then again it's
Friday.
The clapboards that I need to scape and restain are nailed with the
rough side out. It seems that scraping the clapboards could cause the scrapped
areas to be smoother than the non-scrapped areas. The rough vs. smooth
difference would telegraph through the stain (a solid stain) and look pretty
terrible. Anyone have experience with this? Is it a "problem"?
George
|
114.172 | time to paint | PIET09::TRUDEAU | | Fri May 20 1994 12:10 | 12 |
| hi,
i need to paint my house again. it is sided with shakes. the problem
is, some of the shakes have blistered leaving areas where there is
paint on part of the shake and not on the rest. i imagine that painting
the shake would leave an outline of where the stripped paint was.
with regular shingles i understand the proper method of avoiding such
a seam would be to sand the paint edge down so as not to be noticeable.
i don't think that's feasible with shakes. can anyone recommend an
alternate solution? perhaps a wirebrush along the grooves? hmmmmm.
thanks for any thoughts
|
114.39 | More painted shingles to be cleaned | TPSYS::WEST | | Mon Jun 13 1994 14:52 | 16 |
|
I am looking at a ranch house, about 24 x 38, single story, which
has cedar shingles on its walls, but they have been painted.
Does anyone have an update on using sand, walnut shells, or whatever
to clean them down to bare wood, so we can stain them.
I have a lot of windows (17) all around the ranch, so the SF to be done
is fairly small.
Any leads or experiences are appreciated.
Bob
|
114.40 | And they'd look better... | STRATA::CASSIDY | | Tue Jun 14 1994 01:39 | 7 |
|
I'd opt for new shingles. It doesn't take too much work or time
to strip the old ones. Just peel them off with a pitch fork. You
can do just one wall at a time. Snap a line to keep them straight.
I found a table saw can be a big help.
Tim
|
114.481 | Painting Prep of cedar siding | WASHDC::PAGANO | Russ Pagano|DoD Workstation Sales | Fri Jul 08 1994 00:30 | 32 |
| I just finished painting the front of my cedar sided house and I am
having some second thoughs on my prep work. I'm going to knock off
till the fall due to heat/humity but before I paint the rest...
The is the first painting since the builder sprayed or should I say
lightly dusted with an acrylic latex paint on outside of boards only.
It's very rough cedar about 5 years old. It's installed horizontally
and butts into vertical pine trim on edges of house and by doors/
windows. Lots of horizontal splits, splits from nail holes, and knot
hole pops-no warping or buckling to speak of. Many rotted trim pieces.
Caulk is found only around windows doors.
My approach:
Replace any rotted trim.
Tap each board down and set nails or replace nails which missed studs.
Apply acrylic latex caulk to splits, nail holes, where siding
meets trim (I assume this is the cause of the trim rot), and
where 2 pieces of siding butt. Re-caulk as needed around windows.
Brush on 2 coats of acrylic latex paint (same color/brand as builder)
I'm wondering if caulk applied to the splits and nail set holes in
cedar is going to come back to bite me later. The builder used
caulk on some splits when the house was new and it seems to have
held up OK.
Boy have I gone through some caulk. I'm thinking of posting a sign
on the local highway advertising "Come see the amazing house of
caulk ...5miles (ala Dave Barry's amazing house of spackle")
I'm in Maryland so there's not too much local experience. Can one
of you hardy New Englander's help (with advise not painting that is)?
|
114.482 | | MKOTS3::GELE | ARISE,SHINE,FOR THE LIGHT HAS COME | Fri Jul 08 1994 05:39 | 9 |
| I was self employed for 6 years and wood siding is all I did. As far as
caulking goes,I used it occassionally. I prefered latex caulk that had
some silicone in it(all silicone cant be painted). Anyway, you should
be fine and definately much better than if you didnt use anything at
all.However, I would recommend you paint your house every 2-3 years
because the caulk will crack,dry,and fall out. Besides that when the
paint begins to fade the caulking will be mor noticeable.
Sylvain
|
114.558 | Best Exterior question | 58323::JEEVES | | Tue Jul 12 1994 11:18 | 19 |
|
I have a question on what exterior is best for a house. We are about to
build a new home and the contractor asked us what type of exterior we
wanted. Or last house had cedar clapboards, but they of course need
painting every four or five years. I thought that vinyl siding would
be best from a maintenance point of view, but it doesn't feel very
traditional and my wife wants a "traditional colonial" looking house.
A third option, which I've had no experience with, is staining. Is
staining less work than painting?
I'd welcome your opinions on which type of exterior siding you would put on
a new home. The home by the way is being built in Salem, NH.
Regards,
Bill Jeeves
DTN 276-9400
STOWOA::JEEVES
|
114.559 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Jul 12 1994 12:07 | 16 |
| It depends on the style of the house. What looks good on a Cape would look
awful on a Contemporary, and vice versa.
If you're willing to spend a bit up front, you can get a vinyl siding which
looks almost exactly like cedar shakes or clapboards. The product I've
looked most closely at is made by Certainteed. It's much more expensive than
standard "plastic wrap" (my term for vinyl siding), but once its up it's
essentially maintenance-free and it looks very good. It comes in a variety
of styles and colors.
Staining is less work than painting in that you don't have to worry about
scraping and sanding, as long as you're using a transparent or semi-transparent
stain. But you'll be applying it more often than paint (a good paint job should
last more than 4-5 years).
Steve
|
114.560 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue Jul 12 1994 12:25 | 1 |
| See note 1028 (especially 1028.1) for a no-maintenance no-vinyl solution.
|
114.561 | Siding question | CSLALL::RIZZO | | Tue Jul 12 1994 13:44 | 15 |
|
Bill,
I just built a colonial with cedar clapboard siding. After
extensive research, we decided to use an oil base stain. We used
a solid linseed oill based stain with one coat on the interior(smooth
side in) and two coats on the exterior. Siding was cedar Aye and
better. Also made a decision to purchase the clapboards already
stained with the color and manufacturer of your choice. Cost was
approx. eight hundred dollars, but worth the quality of the job
Additionally, make sure that your contractor uses stainless steel nails
on the exterior, as galvanized will eventually rust and bleed through,
even if they are dipped in stain.
Charlie
|
114.562 | I like vinyl siding | TLE::PERIQUET | Dennis Periquet | Tue Jul 12 1994 14:20 | 7 |
|
I just had a colonial built with vinyl siding and it looks very
traditional, is virtually maintenance free (I spray it with the hose
when dirty), and looks great.
Dennis
|
114.483 | polyurethane caulk is best | NOVA::ABBOTT | Robert Abbott | Wed Jul 13 1994 10:14 | 24 |
| The best type of caulk for an exterior application is
polyurethane caulk. This caulk is completely paintable
(unlike 100% silicone) and will not dry and crack as
it ages (unlike latex). This type is recommended by
house restoration experts (Old House Journal) and the
Society for the Preservation of New England Antiquities,
SPNEA.
The negatives are convenience and cost. Polyurethane caulk
is almost completely unavailable at retail outlets.
(Exception, Hammer Hardware in Nashua but at a ripoff price.)
So you have to buy it from a wholesale distributor.
I buy Precora's Dynatrol 1 from Sterling Insulation in Waltham
for about $3 per tube. (Not everyone sells individual
tubes.)
I found the caulk to be harder to apply than latex. It's
much more viscous out of the tube. Polyurethane caulk
requires 3-5 days to cure before painting. It also has
a short shelf life. You should use a tube within 6 months
of purchase.
robert
|
114.563 | Thanks.... | 58323::JEEVES | | Wed Jul 13 1994 13:27 | 7 |
|
Thanks for all the advice. The type of house we are building is a
colonial. I'm leaning towards a "good" vinyl or stain.
Thanks again!
Bill
|
114.564 | From a skeptic - Good-looking vinyl does exist | WMOIS::ECMO::SANTORO | Greg Santoro | Wed Jul 13 1994 14:18 | 20 |
| We also couldn't stand the idea of putting vinyl on a house but since it
provided a most cost effect solution vs cedar we spent a lot of time trying
to find the most natural looking type. Steve is correct...we found
Certainteed to be very good as well as Wolverine. We looked for a good
"flat" look rather than the "wood grain" which in almost all situtations
looks fake (to us). Certainteed had the best grain and color intensity and
Wolverine the best flat look.
Although both are high quality I disagree they cost all that much more. Of
the five estimates we got on our house, only the (2) contractors who didn't
do any significant work in those brands gave a higher price for them...and
it was only a couple hundred. A good contractor that uses any good brand
on a regular basis can match price if pushed. Of course any decent brand
WILL cost more than GP or other lower-end junk.
BTW, after all this effort we decided we couldn't afford new siding now and
will repair and paint the current masonite siding we have until such time
that we win the lottery or Digital lifts the salary freeze.
-G
|
114.565 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Jul 13 1994 21:24 | 12 |
| I goofed - the product I was thinking of is by Nailite; Certainteed
has a similar product called "Cedar Impressions". Unlike standard
vinyl siding, these attempt to mimic the appearance of actual cedar
shakes or clapboards. Both of these lines are injection molded;
Certainteed says theirs are based on molds made from actual cedar
shakes. Nailite has two lines; "Perfection" looks like cedar shingles,
"Hand-Split" looks like shakes. They are VERY convincing until you
get right up to them. (Nailite also has a "stone" and "brick" line.)
Nailite's number is 800-328-9018.
Steve
|
114.284 | Plan for review | NPSS::WADE | | Thu Aug 04 1994 14:36 | 20 |
| I plan on using red cedar clapboards on my new house. The plan is to
use stainless steel nails (5p 1.75" ring shank coil nails using a
power gun) and nail so that only one clapboard is penetrated per nail.
Solid stain with rough side exposed.
Being that I won't need the smooth side I plan on saving a few bucks by
buying the rough grade. Any problems with this? Can I get it with no
knots?
Also there appear to be differing opinions on pre-priming when using a
solid stain. If I could I'd like to save about $.20/foot, or my own
labor, by putting them up with no pre-staining/priming. Anyone have a
good experience with no pre-priming and solid staining after they are
up? I see lots of new houses with red cedar that has only been
stained post installation and the clapboards look fine with no bleeding
or cupping so I'd like to go this route as long as I won't get burnt.
Thanks,
Bill
|
114.285 | shortcuts kill | 18463::DYMON | | Fri Aug 05 1994 07:53 | 15 |
|
"Pay me now or pay me later!"
Builders take shortcuts in order to increase their profit margins
and inrich their quotes to sound cheep! If the house falls apart
a few years down the road. Most builders are gone!
Spend the extra and dip the claps. They'll last longer and save
you extra work.
PS.... I think there was a vinyl product mentioned somewhere that
looked like clapboard.......
JD
|
114.286 | | 2082::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Aug 05 1994 10:43 | 8 |
| Re: .14
> PS.... I think there was a vinyl product mentioned somewhere that
> looked like clapboard.......
Nailite is one, Certainteed has another.
Steve
|
114.287 | | MKOTS3::GELE | ARISE,SHINE,FOR THE LIGHT HAS COME | Sun Aug 07 1994 16:55 | 8 |
| I agree, dip em before you put it up, some of the other houses you have
seen may look good, but in the long run it is what you do now that
matters. Maybe the other house get restained everyother year.
As far as the vinyl siding goes. Excellent product,looks great and has
the cedar texture too. The cedar colored vinyl is very, very impressive
looking, however you can expect to pay around $20 more a square for it.
(roughly, not sure)
|
114.288 | Don't double whaaaat? | NPSS::WADE | Network Systems Support | Tue Sep 13 1994 17:48 | 43 |
| I just wanted to put a note in here about double nailing red cedar
clapboards. The installers just started putting the cedar on our new
house yesterday. I went to the extra expense of pre-priming and using
stainless steel nails so I wanted to be sure that they didn't double
nail.
When I described how I wanted them installed they looked at me like I
had two heads. The foreman stated that he had been installing red
cedar for 17 years and he never heard of this and could not guarantee
the job if done in that way. He mentioned cupping and cracking due to
no support behind the nailed board. After a lengthy discussion I
agreed that they would install them by double nailing.
I have to admit that I've looked at lots of new and not so new houses
and they are all double nailed with no evidence of cracking caused by
drying and shrinking. Like this:
/
/
/
/
|-----/ /
/ /
/
/
|-----/ /
/ /
/
/
/
/
The packaging on the bundles clearly state "do not double nail" and the
red cedar association literature states the same but in the real world
they've been doing it like this forever and that's just the way it is.
The builder contacted Larkin lumber in Hudson, Ma and they had a hard
time believing it to the extend of calling the manufacture. Quite an
uproar when I stopped at Larkins at the end of the day.
Just my experience,
Bill
|
114.289 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Sep 13 1994 17:53 | 4 |
| News to me. I've never seen any NOT double-nailed. My house is done that
way and I've had no problems (house is 28 years old).
Steve
|
114.290 | | MKOTS3::GELE | ARISE,SHINE,FOR THE LIGHT HAS COME | Wed Sep 14 1994 05:46 | 7 |
| Same here, I was a self employed siding contractor for several
years(wood only) always double nailed it. The only way I can see where
it wouldt be considered "double nailing" is if you nailed it about 2
inches up from the bottom in order to avoid nailing the top of the one
underneath and then you would absolutely have "curling" siding.
Sylvain
|
114.291 | | WMOIS::ECMO::SANTORO | Greg Santoro | Wed Sep 14 1994 14:03 | 6 |
| I'm siding with cedar now and I can't understand how you could not double
nail and keep the boards from lifting or cuping. I'm even doing a 4.5"
exposure. (every .5" counts when you are working with cedar)
-Greg
|
114.292 | | NPSS::WADE | Network Systems Support | Wed Sep 14 1994 14:18 | 8 |
| re .-1
That's what everyone says that I've talked to but, I've seen pictures in
red cedar literature that shows how to nail and it states "do not double
nail" and the bundles say the same. I guess it doesn't matter as every
installation I've seen is double nailed and they look fine.
|
114.293 | | WRKSYS::DLEBLANC | | Wed Sep 14 1994 15:46 | 27 |
| Four problems I see with NOT double nailing.
1) by extending the exposed surface, the butt ends
offer no protection underneith, exposing the
Tyvek to UV and the sheating to moisture.
2) The top edge of clapboard is not perfect,
In fact, often times it has strap indents
from the bundle straps or just splintered.
3) I agree on the cupping and spliting as a likely outcome.
I can point to my house at a few placed I nailed too
high.
4) Having that 2nd layer of board underneith offers
some protection from rain wicking into the sheating
through the nails. It does anyway as I removed some
of my clapboard for an addition and the sheating had stains on it.
From one who has done 50 squares of clapboard siding.
I think stanless steel nails is overkill and you'll get
a sparkle to the house until they fade (maybe). Galvonized
nails are fine. The old Brosco book has a beatifull house
with dark nails highlighted on clapboard.
Dan
|
114.294 | | MKOTS3::GELE | ARISE,SHINE,FOR THE LIGHT HAS COME | Thu Sep 15 1994 06:52 | 6 |
| Im going to have to sisagree with you Dan on the nails. Galvanized
nails will bleed although they are not supposed to. I speaking from
experience and dealing with painters. If you can afford the extra
dollars go with the stainless steel.
Sylvain
|
114.295 | CRAFTSMANSHIP, A dying art | CSLALL::NASEAM::READIO | A Smith & Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman Locks | Thu Sep 15 1994 14:39 | 30 |
|
I just ripped the cedar clapboards off my garage. They've been on there
for at least 40 years according to the lady across the street.
NONE of them were double nailed.
^^^^
****
^^^^
The nails were flush with the top edges of the lower clapboards.
I guess carpenters were a bit more particular in the old days. FWIW, they
were galvanized nails, too. There wasn't any bleeding through of the nails
. The biggest reason I re-sided the garage was to go from 4.5" to 3" so as
to match the house (that used to have asbestos shingles over the original
clapboards.
Come to think of it, those clapboards weren't double nailed, either.
_/___
/ /
/
_/___
/ /
/
_/___
/ /
/
/
...and he clapboards weren't cupped anywhere, either
|
114.484 | misc ramblings on paint/staining your house | HELIX::LUNGER | | Thu Oct 20 1994 14:07 | 16 |
| just a few ramblings while in the midst of doing some exterior staining
that I've not seen elsewhere:
how do you deal with downspouts? if brushing, do you poke the bristles
behind; or do you temporarily remove the downspout?
assume you are using a ladder; do you have a favorite direction to
move in (right or left? are you a righty or lefty?)?
do you paint/stain on both sides of the ladder? if so, what do you
do where the ladder leans on the house? do you do the
"ladder-two-step" 30' into the air to move the ladder shadow a few
inches? or do you just paint above where the ladder leans on the house?
|
114.485 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Oct 20 1994 14:20 | 14 |
| Remove the downspouts if possible, otherwise remove what brackets you can and
swing it out of the way while painting.
I painted on both sides of the ladder and did as far "inside" the ladder as
I could reasonably get. I figured I'd get that part on the next pass at a
lower elevation. NEVER, EVER do the "ladder-two-step". I used a ladder
stabilizer which gave me a bit more distance from the siding.
I tended to move from right to left, possibly because it was easier for me
(being right-handed) to stretch a bit more to the right to get the overlap.
But I was always mindful of the rule which says to keep your belt buckle
between the ladder rails.
Steve
|
114.237 | removing Masonite? | SALEM::MUNROER | Becca Munroe | Wed Mar 29 1995 17:09 | 15 |
| New Question--
My house is sided with masonite, which is now beginning to
blister/buckle/etc. I am going to rip off all the Masonite and re-side
with cedar shingles.
Does anybody have a really good technique for ripping the masonite off?
The "boards" are nailed close to the edge (about .5"). and the boards
are swollen around the nails. We tried hammering a crow-bar up under
the boards near the nails, but this took a while because the paint was
so thick on the bottom edges of the boards. We are going to try a
sharper, thinner crow-bar. Are there any tricks?
Thanks in advance!!!
-Becca
|
114.238 | got it on my house (4+ years old now...) | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | Disabled Service Button | Wed Mar 29 1995 21:37 | 4 |
| just wondering, how old is the house and was it kept up (painted once in a
while...)?
bjm
|
114.239 | 20 years old | SALEM::MUNROER | Becca Munroe | Thu Mar 30 1995 09:12 | 12 |
| It's 20 years old (I think). I think it was painted once in a while,
but I don't know for certain (I bought the house a few months back--
knowing I'd rip down the masonite).
Last Saturday it took quite a bit of effort to rip off one board, and
there were many black ants. I think there were so many because the it
was not very well caulked next to the electric meter. There was no
plywood damage that I could see.
I have received several recommendations to use the "wonderbar", a
flat-sided crowbar with a sharp end. Will see how well it works.
|
114.240 | Leaf Spring = Wide Pry-Bar | ACADPE::STLAURENT | | Thu Mar 30 1995 13:43 | 22 |
| My favorite prying tool is made from a broken leaf spring. It's about
half a spring that fell off a pickup truck Grind it sharp on one end
and round the corners a little. This thing works real well without doing
damage to the trim or walls. It's wide 2+ inches and the built in curve
works well when prying.
And just a friendly reminder to wear safety glasses and work gloves.
I wonder if maybe, the built up paint layers have created a very
effective vapor barrier and are trapping condensation and the dampness
has invited the ants. If this is what's happening, you should see the
ants around walls where high moisture is produced, like bath room, wash
room and kitchen area. This could be why the siding is failing as well?
This is something I've suspected would happen to house covered with
multiple heavy coats of paint, where all the seams in the siding are
closed.
Anyone got any comments,ideas or first hand experiences to share on this
exterior vapor barrier theory?
/Jim
|
114.241 | | WMOIS::ECMO::SANTORO | Greg Santoro | Thu Mar 30 1995 14:32 | 8 |
| I am in the process of a 2 year project to replace my siding (from
hardboard) to cedar. I used a wonderbar to get under and loosen one board
and then use the crowbar up underneath to rip up 3-4 at a time going
across the wall. Works fairly well and you have to be very careful at the
higher levels. Before I figured out this method, I just used a wonderbar
and a 20oz hammer. pound the curved claw up under the nail and loosen.
Then turn the bar around and pull till the nail pops. Repeat for each
nail across the length of the board.
|
114.443 | Why will a builder not upgrade siding? | SMURF::WALTERS | | Thu Apr 13 1995 17:55 | 21 |
|
We recently looked at a new development by Ashwood Homes in Nashua. The
siding contractor was there putting siding on one shell (OSB sheathing,
no housewrap). The material looked like it was moulded hardboard,
pre-primed and given one topcoat. There was no paint or primer on the
back surface. Very dense and hard, but definitely pressed wood fibre.
According to the the selling agent, the builders would make layout
changes, pour additional deck footings, etc. and they were amenable to
most requests. The one thing they would not budge on was a request to
upgrade the siding to stainless steel-nailed cedar.
We have cedar siding right now, and we know that it would cost a chunk
of change for the upgrade. Any thoughts on why they would not want to
do a siding upgrade?
Regards,
Colin
|
114.444 | Kickbacks!!! | STRATA::CASSIDY | Tim Cassidy, #365 | Fri Apr 14 1995 06:16 | 9 |
| > Any thoughts on why they would not want to do a siding upgrade?
Maybe they don't know how to do anything else. Or maybe their
brother in law does the siding. Call me aracist, but I don't
trust builders.
Tim
|
114.445 | | CMEM3::GOODWIN | Paul Goodwin (dtn)223-6581 | Fri Apr 14 1995 07:42 | 9 |
|
That type of siding is not uncommon and will last a long time
if you keep it painted. Moisture is a big problem so it is not
recommended on the north side of houses and where the house
doesn't get much sunlight to dry it out. I wouldn't be that
concerned about the housewrap but a good vapor barrier is a must.
Paul
|
114.446 | the builder wants no part of it | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | Disabled Service Button | Fri Apr 14 1995 08:03 | 22 |
| >> We recently looked at a new development by Ashwood Homes in Nashua. The
Ashwood Homes is the problem.
From experence, they only like very simple changes that they can easily plan
for and that either end up saving them money or cost no more money. Asking
them to tell one of their contractors to go out and buy cedar and use SS nails
would do two things:
1) cost you much more than it was worth
2) most likly get you a poorly sided home (so used to putting up the masonite)
I do think you can get them to wrap the house though (if you want). One of the
two houses that I saw them put up near me was wrapped. I assume that the owner
paid more for it.
As .18 mentions though, the Masonite (maybe a brand name) is getting to be very
common - even on "upper class" houses. Keep it painted (ie keep the water
out!) and it should last just as long as cedar.
Brian J. - owner of a Asswood Homes house (oh, sorry about that type-o, but my
backspace key is broken and I can't fix it :-) )
|
114.447 | oh well, | SMURF::WALTERS | | Fri Apr 14 1995 11:00 | 17 |
| Thanks,
My suspicious mind thought that they just wouldn't want one
house in the development where the siding didn't fall off in 10 years
time. ;-)
Apart from the siding, the general construction seemd to be much better
than the Stabile home that we have. PT sole plates bolted down, good
carpentry, and quality materials.
Unfortunately, the only decent-size lots have an easement for right of
way that runs smack through the back yards. Time to review the
"be your own general contractor notes" I guess.
Regards,
Colin
|
114.448 | they used to do it | TLE::WENDYL::BLATT | | Fri Apr 14 1995 11:41 | 17 |
| I came close to purcasing an Ashwood home a couple of years ago and
I was quoted a price for upgrading to cedar siding. (I think it was
$5K but not sure). We never got to P&S so I don't know if they would
have re-negged later, but at the time they were very amenable to
lots of spec changes. After reading this notes conference, I had *LOTS*
of quality issues to address and they were great about it.
Maybe it's because we were at the tail end of the recession (spring/summer 92)
and now the supply/demand is switching? Maybe it's because they were
anxious to sell lots in an upcoming new development.
Another interesting note on Ashwood and siding is that the above
house was in Nashua. I later was house-hunting in Pepperell/Groton
area and they had a listing for a to-be-built and the siding was
listed as "cedar"!!! regional marketing???
|
114.449 | | NOVA::FISHER | now |a|n|a|l|o|g| | Sat Apr 15 1995 12:26 | 6 |
| My understanding is Masonite's cheapest, then vinyl, then cedar. The
builder's just lazy, or knows his crews would screw up a cedar job.
"better than the Stabile home ..." that's easy :-)
ed
|
114.450 | IMHO | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | Disabled Service Button | Sat Apr 15 1995 12:31 | 5 |
| >> builder's just lazy, or knows his crews would screw up a cedar job.
I don't think this builder would care if the crew screwed up the job :-)
bjm
|
114.452 | | CMEM3::GOODWIN | Paul Goodwin (dtn)223-6581 | Tue Apr 18 1995 08:54 | 9 |
|
re:. 24
Cedar Clapboards with scarf joints should not cost any more than
butt joints no matter what a builder may tell you. The only difference
is that the cutoff saw is set for a 45 degree bevel instead of a
90 degree bevel.
Paul
|
114.310 | repair split clapboards? | SMURF::WALTERS | | Tue Apr 18 1995 09:51 | 14 |
|
Is it possible to repair split cedar clapboards by filling them in some
way?
Also, I have a couple of spare lengths that have been in the basement
for about 2 years. They seem to have warped into a curve (cupped?)
and I suspect that they would also split if I attempted to use them.
Can I wet them and weight them down to flatten out the warp. Or
will they curl up again when dry?
Regards,
Colin
|
114.311 | Bring Back A Cupped Board | ACADPE::STLAURENT | | Tue Apr 18 1995 13:46 | 22 |
| Colin,
If the siding is a solid color, you could try a latex caulking to fill the
crack before re-painting/staining. Try an inconspicuous location first,
just in case you don't like the results. Caulking is available in multitude
of colors, mostly earth tones, try something close to final color.
As for a cupped board, try laying it out in the morning dew, with the
crown up. Keep an eye on it once the sun is out and it should
straighten itself out in a few hour hours. What you'll be doing is
drying the side with high moisture and and adding moisture to the dry
side. You need to play games if the cup isn't uniform the whole length
of the board, by protecting the good section on the underside or
wetting a section which is worse than the rest. Thicker boards can be
brought back this way as well, but you may need to re-soak the ground
once or twice. If you're not ready to install it right away store it in a
dry location, like the attic and weight it down as well. Otherwise work it
and seal it completely when it dries to the touch.
/Jim
|
114.312 | I'll give that a try | SMURF::WALTERS | | Tue Apr 18 1995 14:16 | 4 |
|
.5
Great - thanks for the tips
|
114.453 | Concern with cedar "bleed through?" | MILKWY::JSIEGEL | | Fri Apr 21 1995 14:41 | 6 |
| If they were concerned with future customer satisfaction or having to
repaint, they may have wanted to be sure they didn't have to deal with
"bleeding" in a year or two. Cedar often bleeds or stains through the
paint unless very thoroughly pretreated. White paint seems to be
especially prone to show bleed-throughs. I've seen a house painted 2
times, and still more stains came through.
|
114.454 | | OOTOOL::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Fri Apr 21 1995 15:08 | 11 |
| A recent building magazine showed an "Earth-friendly" house. One of
the products it used was orient strand board (OSB). It's made of wood
remnants held together with a waterproof resin. It's layered in
alternating directions (like plywood) for strength. They didn't give
any details about durability or whatever.
I just had my house painted -- Masonite siding. Unfortunately, it had
needed painting for the last two years or so, and now the siding's
coming apart and needs to be replaced within the next five years or so.
On the other hand, the house is some 25 years old. The lesson is that
Masonite is okay IFF you keep it protected with regular maintenance.
|
114.455 | | CONSLT::MCBRIDE | Reformatted to fit your screen | Fri Apr 21 1995 16:07 | 7 |
| OSB has many advantages over plywood like it will not delaminate as
readily, is stronger per given thickness etc. It is also heavier so
consideration must be given if using for roofing that the roof system
can take the loads. OSB has been around for a long time BTW and is
cheaper than a comparable thickness of plywood.
Brian
|
114.456 | comparative shopping | SMURF::WALTERS | | Tue May 16 1995 22:26 | 19 |
|
We've now had a chance to look at houses ranging from 0 to 25
years with all kinds of different siding. Even the denser
"post masonite" stuff really suffers if not repainted right after
the builders finish. I guess that unless you specify a primer
and two topcoats, most builders get away with a single coat.
Kind of odd seeing a 10-yr-old house that is immaculate inside
yet has the siding rotting off the outside.
It seems that even with the problems of wood clapboard splitting
it's a lot more resilient than the man-made stuff. It's also
more forgiving if you leave painting a little later than you should.
Try that with the pressed fibre siding and as soon as the first flake
of paint hits the ground the siding is sucking up water like
a trans-saraha camel.
Regards,
Colin
|
114.242 | I'm making progress | SALEM::MUNROER | Becca Munroe | Tue Jun 13 1995 12:08 | 13 |
| Well, It's going pretty well. Have about a third (or that's how many
squares of shingles I've put up :)) done so far. I rip sections down
and re-side up. Easiest to rip from the top down-- can pull 10'-15'
sections down from the top of each "board".
Question: any danger of asbestos in the masonite? I called a number
listed in here for the EPA in Boston, and they said 30 years old is the
rough cutoff (house is 20 years old). "Probably less than 1%
asbestos". Should I be worried?
Regards,
Becca
|
114.243 | | OOTOOL::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Tue Jun 13 1995 16:49 | 2 |
| Wear a mask (buy one or tie a handkerchief around your face). It's
probably kinda dusty work, anyway.
|
114.244 | simple measures | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | Stunt babies on closed course. | Wed Jun 14 1995 07:51 | 11 |
| >> asbestos". Should I be worried?
I kind of go along the lines of "everything in moderation". I think the threat
of asbestos is over-blown. Sure I'd have a mask on but I sure as hell would
not call the heath department down to "check it out". For all I know they
would end up saying the house would have to be wrapped in plastic and you would
have to dress up in the white suits before entering every day, not to mention
what it would then cost me to dispose of the "toxic waste covering my house"
:-)
bjm
|
114.313 | cut in place? | STOWOA::RYAN_J | | Fri Jun 23 1995 12:10 | 8 |
| I have a piece that is solid execpt for about three feet on the end.
How (if I can) can I cut the piece to just replace the split end?
Do I remove the whole piece?
The other notes have helped in how to remove the nails and boards.
JR
|
114.486 | Need Help for Siding With Cedar Shingles | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Mon Jun 26 1995 16:29 | 16 |
| Hi,
I want to side my house with cedar shingles and I will
need to do it myself. I'm just wondering if anyone can
offer any inputs on how to find out how to do the job.
Its a 2 story house so I'll need to make a scaffolding
as well.
I have masonite on there now which I consider to be
not worth having.
Any inouts welcome including where to get some literature
on how best to do the job.
Tony
|
114.487 | in progress...still | SALEM::MUNROER | Becca Munroe | Mon Jun 26 1995 19:40 | 13 |
| Hi Tony,
I'm halfway (yeah!!!) done this and have entered notes on it. Check
out the masonite notes and shingle notes. I'm ripping 10' sections of
the masonite off myself and shingling up (leaving 1/2" to 3/4" of lap).
Had a heck of a time getting rid of the masonite.
Pumpjacks work well for me, once I figured them out. I have 15' 2x4's
for the vertical supports. I don't have too much trouble moving them
myself-- you find all the little tricks as you go.
Regards,
Becca
|
114.488 | | HELIX::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Tue Jun 27 1995 08:53 | 17 |
| A couple of things that will help out:
Lay out the vertical spacing of the rows ahead of time, so rows line
up at the bottoms and tops of windows and doors; that way you don't
end up with having to put in a 3/4" high row that looks weird.
Get yourself a long, straight 1x3 and staple a couple 2"x10" strips
of aluminum flashing to it, wrapping it around the bottom edge. Then,
with a single staple using one leg of the staple only, staple the
top of the flashing to the wall such that the top of the board lines
up with the shingle line. You can then just set the shingles on the
board to line them up for nailing. When you're done, knock the board
loose with a hammer; the aluminum flashing will tear loose from the
single staple (now covered up by shingles) and you can just pull the
flashing out...you have to be careful not to nail through the flashing
when you put the shingles on, of course.....
|
114.489 | Thanks | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Wed Jun 28 1995 12:36 | 14 |
| Thanks!
Ya know...every time I've discussed wanting to put up cedar
shingles with contractors, they always seem to push vinyl.
Must be a high profit margin with vinyl (and of course low
labor).
I'd rather go more natural though I suspect it will be a lot
of work.
Becca...that masonite's a bunch of crap, huh???!
Tony
|
114.490 | no vinyl for me | SALEM::MUNROER | Becca Munroe | Wed Jun 28 1995 13:44 | 5 |
| Vinyl's quick. I have a gag reflex with vinyl. I *love* the cedar!
A lot of people just vinyl over the masonite-- but I've found lots
of bugs/ants/insects living in the gaps under the masonite (the boards
aren't tapered!!!! Yuck!).
|
114.491 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Jun 28 1995 13:50 | 1 |
| I'm curious. Why shingles instead of clapboards?
|
114.492 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Jun 28 1995 14:31 | 5 |
| Shingles give a different look. On some house styles shingles look better,
on others clapboards do. I happen to like the irregularity of shingles -
at least on a Cape-style house like mine.
Steve
|
114.493 | lovely. | SMURF::WALTERS | | Wed Jun 28 1995 14:39 | 5 |
|
How about the worst of both worlds? Mother-in-law's house is
sided with fake vinyl shingles......shudder.
C.
|
114.494 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Jun 28 1995 14:53 | 6 |
| Some of them look ok - I've seriously considered the Nailite and
Certainteed vinyl siding which is moulded to look like shingles. The biggest
problem I have with it is the limited color selection. I agree that the
majority of vinyl siding looks awful.
Steve
|
114.495 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Jun 28 1995 16:06 | 2 |
| Am I correct in assuming that shingles cost less for materials than clapboards
but require more labor?
|
114.496 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Jun 28 1995 16:34 | 3 |
| I suppose so - never really looked at the cost difference.
Steve
|
114.497 | shingles | SALEM::MUNROER | Becca Munroe | Thu Jun 29 1995 09:15 | 6 |
| When I priced them, shingles and clapboards seemed about comparable.
It was a toss-up for me at first. But, I decided I wanted a more
Cape-Cod weathered look (and I wanted a semi-transparent grey stain).
The look, combined with the ease of one-person job (I'm doing this
after work), and the choice was shingles. My house less than 1100 SF,
so the shingles seem more in scale to me.
|
114.498 | How much per sq ft | USCTR1::LAJEUNESSE | | Thu Jun 29 1995 16:44 | 21 |
| Hi,
I have a 40 year old gambrel cape. The only problem is that the
previous owner vinyl sided it. I want to do the sides in Shingles
and the front and back in clapboards.
Any guess on what this would cost? Do you figure it by square foot?
I'd be doing the work myself. It has about 2700 sq ft of living space.
Right now, under the vinyl is all shingles in a real dark brown. I
guess I could keep those on the sides and sand blast them right?
The other thing I'm afraid of is vinyl covers a lot of sins. I am
scared of what I might find under there!
Thanks,
Mark
|
114.499 | | HELIX::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Fri Jun 30 1995 10:00 | 8 |
| You may have trouble keeping the shingles that are under the
vinyl because of all the nail holes. I stronly suspect you'll
need to tear everything off and start over.
You *can* do it in stages though; do the ends one year, and the
front and back the next year, or whenever you have enough money.
|
114.548 | Shiplap | RANGLY::DEROSA | the mill is gone | Tue Sep 12 1995 13:23 | 7 |
| I just finished off the inside of our 3-season porch with 1x8 knotty-pine
shiplap. Came out great. I want clear coat it with something to preserve
it. I assume it should be an external clear coat. Anyone have any
suggestions. I thought about external polyurethane.
Thanks in advance
/BD
|
114.549 | See topic 940 (?) | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, That Group | Tue Sep 12 1995 13:27 | 2 |
| 940 FRSBEE::PAGLIARULO 27-MAR-1987 29 Ship-Lap Pine Question
1751 BPOV09::JMICHAUD 30-NOV-1987 18 Advice on shiplap floor.
|
114.543 | Shiplap done, next? | BIGQ::BERNIER | | Tue Sep 12 1995 14:08 | 13 |
|
I just finished my porch interior with 8" shiplap. I stained it
with Minwax 'Natural' stain prior to installation. It did not
change the color but brings out the knots a bit more. I
countersunk the nails and puttied them.
It was suggested I use a 'sanding sealer' next. Is this correct?
What are my other options or should I use this as well as a clear.
Or should I use oil?
Rgds,
/andy
|
114.550 | | STAR::MWOLINSKI | uCoder sans Frontieres | Tue Sep 12 1995 14:57 | 17 |
|
Rep .0 BD
>>>I just finished off the inside of our 3-season porch with 1x8
knotty-pine shiplap. Came out great. I want clear coat it with
something to preserve it. I assume it should be an external
clear coat. Anyone have any suggestions. I thought about
external polyurethane.
I just finished a doing the same thing on my three season porch
and I just used Thompson's Water Seal. It worked great, brought out
the grain in the wood and give it a nice light hiney color.
-mike
|
114.551 | Preference | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Tue Sep 12 1995 16:30 | 8 |
| re:2
> and give it a nice light hiney color.
I sort of prefer a nice tanned hiney color, but to each their own I
guess ;-)
Ray
|
114.552 | | STAR::MWOLINSKI | uCoder sans Frontieres | Wed Sep 13 1995 10:14 | 11 |
|
Rep .2 Ray
>>>> and give it a nice light hiney color.
oops, typo or maybe a freudian slip of the fingers!!! ;-)
-mike
|
114.553 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | sunlight held together by water | Wed Sep 13 1995 12:02 | 3 |
| >a nice light hiney color
That would be, er, buff, wouldn't it? :-)
|
114.554 | | TP011::KENAH | Do we have any peanut butter? | Wed Sep 13 1995 12:13 | 6 |
| >>a nice light hiney color
>
> That would be, er, buff, wouldn't it? :-)
Nope, more of a coppertone.
|
114.555 | poly is good !! | ANGST::DWORSACK | | Wed Sep 13 1995 15:15 | 5 |
| yes, i used external polyurethane. before the clear poly i also
put a light coat of stain (to preference)...
the poly gives good protection. you wont have to worry about
ocasional water if it happens...
|
114.544 | poly once again | ANGST::DWORSACK | | Wed Sep 13 1995 15:21 | 16 |
| again, as i said i another note, exterior poly is good too.
but i didnt say earlier, that i mixed gloss with semi gloss.
i wanted a just a slight gloss look....
it did take a little testing before i mixed a whole batch...
yes the minwax natural will bring out the look of the wood, but
will not seal the grain. youll need to either use some type of
poly or sanding sanding sealer if you wish. i went with the poly
to really seal the grain, so water drops from big storms or
when i hose off the deck it will just wipe off...
good luck,
jim
|
114.556 | The old way | STRATA::CASSIDY | Tim Cassidy, #365 | Sat Sep 16 1995 00:45 | 4 |
| You could use boiled linseed oil. It darkens the wood slightly.
I used it on my porch. It looks very natural.
Tim
|
114.557 | | VMSSPT::PAGLIARULO | | Mon Sep 18 1995 08:07 | 6 |
| If your porch is going to get a lot of water from rain coming in the
screens I wouldn't recommend the boiled linseed oil, unless you are willing to
reapply it every year or two. I used it in my porch and wasn't real pleased
with the water protection it gave. It also gives the wood a blonde color.
George
|
114.591 | Masonite Hardboard Siding class action lawsuit | STAR::DZIEDZIC | Tony Dziedzic - DTN 381-2438 | Thu Apr 18 1996 08:40 | 20 |
| This probably belongs in the "Wood by-Product Siding" note, but
since there isn't one, I guess this is a reasonable place.
Last night I read an ad (in TV Guide) about a class action lawsuit
filed against the company which makes Masonite brand hardboard
siding. A recorded message containing instructions on how to obtain
further details on the suit or to exclude oneself from the class
may be heard by calling (800) 330-2722. Those calling are advised
to write to
Masonite Siding Litigation
P.O. Box 2487
Mobile, AL 36652
to obtain more information, join the class, or exclude oneself
from the class.
I saw a similar notice for Georgia-Pacific's product about two or
three months ago. Unfortunately, I don't have any additional
information.
|
114.592 | on the web where else | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | A Quinn Martin Production | Thu Apr 18 1996 13:53 | 5 |
| and the web page:
http://www.kinsella.com
describes the class action suite also.
|
114.593 | Cracks in Siding | KOALA::MORRIS | | Fri Aug 30 1996 12:16 | 11 |
114.593 | Water leaking through the siding...? HELP! | LESREG::JACKSON | | Mon Oct 21 1996 14:05 | 49 |
114.594 | | SHRMSG::BUSKY | | Mon Oct 21 1996 15:45 | 6 |
114.595 | water, water everywhere.... | PCBUOA::TARDIFF | Dave Tardiff | Mon Oct 21 1996 16:47 | 61 |
114.596 | some leaks can be found and fixed | CPEEDY::BRADLEY | Chuck Bradley | Mon Oct 21 1996 18:30 | 13 |
114.597 | when is a basement leak a basement leak? | TLE::PACKED::BLATT | | Tue Oct 22 1996 17:47 | 19 |
114.598 | | WLDBIL::KILGORE | How serious is this? | Wed Oct 23 1996 08:21 | 15 |
114.599 | | HYLNDR::BROWN | | Wed Oct 23 1996 10:22 | 21 |
114.600 | | PCBUOA::TARDIFF | Dave Tardiff | Wed Oct 23 1996 12:48 | 15 |
114.601 | Thanks for the replies | LESREG::JACKSON | | Wed Oct 23 1996 13:47 | 33 |
114.602 | might be a general install problem, too. | DYPSS1::SCHAFER | Character matters. | Tue Oct 29 1996 23:13 | 7 |
114.603 | | HYLNDR::BROWN | | Wed Oct 30 1996 12:21 | 23 |
114.604 | | PCBUOA::TARDIFF | Dave Tardiff | Wed Oct 30 1996 13:05 | 11 |
114.605 | RE: .604 - what's wrong with OSB? | LANDO::NIEMI | | Wed Oct 30 1996 13:32 | 16 |
114.606 | giant trees? I want deck chairs! | PCBUOA::TARDIFF | Dave Tardiff | Thu Oct 31 1996 09:55 | 38 |
114.607 | | CONSLT::MCBRIDE | Idleness, the holiday of fools | Thu Oct 31 1996 11:17 | 16 |
114.608 | | HYLNDR::BROWN | | Thu Oct 31 1996 12:46 | 35 |
114.609 | hates nail guns | DYPSS1::SCHAFER | Character matters. | Wed Nov 06 1996 22:48 | 15 |
114.610 | like any tool, use it correctly and get good results | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | A Quinn Martin Production | Thu Nov 07 1996 06:11 | 13 |
114.611 | | BGSDEV::POEGEL | | Thu Nov 07 1996 07:38 | 15 |
114.612 | don't think so | DYPSS1::SCHAFER | Character matters. | Fri Nov 08 1996 00:29 | 13 |
114.613 | changing codes? | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | A Quinn Martin Production | Fri Nov 08 1996 07:21 | 8
|