Username | Total Posts | First Post | Last Post | Most Used Personal Name |
---|---|---|---|---|
2816::GLOSSOP | 19 | Sat May 21 1994 | Thu Aug 24 1995 | Low volume == Endangered species |
2816::SMOP::glossop | 2 | Mon Mar 13 1995 | Mon Mar 13 1995 | Low volume == Endangered species |
GEMGRP::GLOSSOP | 269 | Thu Jan 20 1994 | Fri Jan 10 1997 | Low volume == Endangered species |
smop.zko.dec.com::glossop | 11 | Mon Dec 12 1994 | Thu Mar 09 1995 | Low volume == Endangered species |
SMOP::glossop | 114 | Tue Mar 01 1994 | Thu Apr 06 1995 | Kent Glossop |
gemevn.zko.dec.com::GLOSSOP | 68 | Thu Jan 11 1996 | Tue Jun 03 1997 | Alpha: Voluminously challenged |
GEMEVN::GLOSSOP | 165 | Thu Jan 11 1996 | Sun Jun 01 1997 | Alpha: Voluminously challenged |
Conference | Total Posts | Conference Title |
---|---|---|
turris::decc | 13 | DECC |
turris::alpha_callstd | 10 | ALPHA Calling Standard |
7.286::digital | 9 | The Digital way of working |
turris::decc_bugs | 7 | DEC C Problem Reporting Forum |
turris::dec_fortran_alpha | 6 | DEC Fortran on ALPHA |
turris::alpha_l | 4 | Alpha_L |
turris::evax_bliss | 1 | BLISS compilers for Alpha AXP -- ** DIGITAL CONFIDENTIAL ** |
turris::evax_bliss | 1 | BLISS compilers for Alpha AXP -- ** DIGITAL CONFIDENTIAL ** |
TOPIC | 3520.0 | Alpha migration rate? | ||
3520.69 | Wed Dec 28 1994 08:43 | 41 lines | ||
TOPIC | 3539.0 | SAVE PLAN | ||
3539.131 | Fri Mar 17 1995 11:43 | Hey, at least you'll get more from SS than you put in... | 7 lines | |
TOPIC | 3591.0 | Just Say NO! | ||
3591.2 | Tue Dec 20 1994 09:12 | Lots of processes needing improvement... | 28 lines | |
3591.42 | Mon Dec 26 1994 23:29 | 77 lines | ||
TOPIC | 3609.0 | Keep Alpha Notebook Alive | ||
3609.7 | Wed Jan 04 1995 21:40 | RE: .3/.5 | 15 lines | |
TOPIC | 3736.0 | Gov. Weld's visit to India: Who was on DEC team? | ||
3736.41 | Thu Mar 23 1995 11:45 | Competitiveness requires investment... | 17 lines | |
3736.46 | Sun Mar 26 1995 23:18 | 10 lines | ||
TOPIC | 3760.0 | Home Office | ||
3760.1 | Thu Mar 23 1995 19:00 | Are you counting both sides of the equation? | 48 lines | |
TOPIC | 3779.0 | Digital UNIX advert. | ||
3779.31 | Mon Apr 03 1995 16:58 | 43 lines |
TOPIC | 1904.0 | unresolved symbol for f77 program | ||
1904.11 | Mon Mar 06 1995 23:22 | 10 lines | ||
TOPIC | 2012.0 | UNAVOLACC/granularity/atomicity/volatile issues; feedback requested for customer | ||
2012.5 | Mon Feb 20 1995 09:40 | 6 lines | ||
TOPIC | 2093.0 | Is 0.0**0 defined? | ||
2093.15 | Thu Apr 27 1995 11:28 | Maybe check, but only if the user asks... | 2 lines | |
TOPIC | 2150.0 | VOLATILE and /GRANULARITY | ||
2150.1 | Wed May 17 1995 14:56 | Does this help? | 17 lines | |
2150.6 | Fri May 26 1995 10:58 | 35 lines | ||
TOPIC | 2153.0 | traceback line number inaccurate | ||
2153.3 | Sun May 21 1995 23:46 | Noted... | 2 lines |
TOPIC | 1218.0 | Status of EV5 C compiler support | ||
1218.1 | Wed Apr 12 1995 21:25 | 1 lines | ||
TOPIC | 1224.0 | urgent: -om problem, please help. | ||
1224.1 | Fri Apr 14 1995 20:26 | 3 lines | ||
TOPIC | 1240.0 | too many load/store | ||
1240.3 | Mon May 08 1995 15:35 | 3 lines | ||
1240.4 | Mon May 08 1995 17:42 | 2 lines | ||
TOPIC | 1316.0 | swap(a,b,len) | ||
1316.2 | Fri Jun 16 1995 02:53 | 4*size memrefs preferable to 6*size memrefs... | 3 lines | |
1316.5 | Fri Jun 16 1995 22:32 | BTW... :-) | 7 lines | |
TOPIC | 1335.0 | Question on intrinsic functions - ASMs | ||
1335.1 | Mon Jun 26 1995 19:27 | 9 lines | ||
1335.3 | Mon Jun 26 1995 20:01 | 37 lines | ||
TOPIC | 1343.0 | CC-W-UNAVOLACC on AXP (VMS) | ||
1343.1 | Wed Jul 05 1995 13:01 | An attempt at an explanation... | 37 lines | |
TOPIC | 1375.0 | Support for Bit Fields Greater Than 32 Bits | ||
1375.1 | Tue Jul 25 1995 15:46 | 2 lines | ||
1375.2 | Tue Jul 25 1995 15:50 | 39 lines | ||
1375.5 | Tue Jul 25 1995 17:22 | Is the problem the field or the large literal? | 7 lines | |
TOPIC | 1388.0 | Where to find Digital Unix BL30 GEM??? | ||
1388.1 | Sat Jul 29 1995 12:24 | 3 lines |
TOPIC | 921.0 | DEC C T5.0 optimizing despite /NOOPT | ||
921.1 | Thu Apr 27 1995 18:57 | 3 lines | ||
TOPIC | 949.0 | return statement does not expand to int | ||
949.16 | Fri Jun 16 1995 02:56 | 4 lines | ||
TOPIC | 966.0 | EV5 code scheduling | ||
966.1 | Fri Jul 21 1995 01:00 | "Not a software problem"... | 37 lines | |
966.3 | Sat Jul 22 1995 20:39 | 77 lines | ||
TOPIC | 967.0 | integer-divide-intensive applications | ||
967.1 | Tue Jul 25 1995 01:15 | 29 lines | ||
967.4 | Tue Jul 25 1995 15:56 | 13 lines | ||
967.6 | Tue Jul 25 1995 18:20 | 54 lines |
TOPIC | 92.0 | AVMS ENTRY_LENGTH revisited et al | ||
92.10 | Tue Feb 21 1995 19:43 | Note that we already share code in some cases | 51 lines | |
TOPIC | 96.0 | Mon Mar 20 1995 15:07 | Entry/exit calling standard questions | 2 lines |
96.1 | Mon Mar 20 1995 16:15 | 82 lines | ||
TOPIC | 99.0 | Is this optimization allowed by the call standard? | ||
99.1 | Fri Apr 14 1995 20:33 | 5 lines | ||
99.3 | Mon Apr 17 1995 12:00 | 49 lines | ||
99.5 | Mon Apr 17 1995 12:36 | 18 lines | ||
99.7 | Mon Apr 17 1995 20:08 | I overstated a bit, but the problem is limited | 5 lines | |
99.9 | Tue Apr 18 1995 14:09 | 5 lines | ||
TOPIC | 105.0 | R28 is unpredictable after (external?) transfer | ||
105.18 | Thu Oct 31 1996 00:13 | 124 lines | ||
105.19 | Thu Oct 31 1996 00:22 | Any transfer, but not specified where | 17 lines |
TOPIC | 45.0 | Is having to say "long pointers" twice really customer-friendly? | ||
45.1 | Tue Aug 22 1995 17:05 | Having just been burned (again), I still think this is broken | 6 lines | |
45.4 | Tue Aug 22 1995 21:44 | This isn't enabled for GEM yet because it generates too many messages... | 4 lines | |
45.5 | Thu Aug 24 1995 12:11 | 5 lines | ||
TOPIC | 53.0 | -arch proposal for Unix (cross posted in SWAT) | ||
53.4 | Fri Jun 16 1995 22:07 | 64 lines |
TOPIC | 302.0 | UNAVOLACC on fetch from quadword-aligned element | ||
302.1 | Tue Oct 17 1995 17:11 | Is the USG$L_SERIALNUM field aligned? | 10 lines |
TOPIC | 302.0 | UNAVOLACC on fetch from quadword-aligned element | ||
302.1 | Tue Oct 17 1995 17:11 | Is the USG$L_SERIALNUM field aligned? | 10 lines |
First Post: | Tue Dec 20 1994 |
Last Post: | Thu Oct 31 1996 |
# Topics: | 1 |
# Replies: | 50 |
# We have note bodies for: | 9 |