TOPIC | 1681.0 | VAX COBOL T4.4 net kit available! |
| 1681.5 | Thu Nov 15 1990 10:33 | Try VTX PAK | 6 lines |
TOPIC | 1793.0 | truncation of comp on divide without /truncate |
| 1793.1 | Tue Mar 19 1991 09:57 | looks like size error to me | 14 lines |
TOPIC | 1938.0 | Different results with NODECIMAL vs DECIMAL |
| 1938.2 | Tue Sep 03 1991 17:32 | not just a difference, its a bug! | 14 lines |
TOPIC | 1943.0 | Accvio on compute when compiling /INSTRUCT=NODECIMAL |
| 1943.1 | Wed Sep 04 1991 16:03 | readying new COBRTL as we write | 3 lines |
TOPIC | 1977.0 | /NODEC does not help much |
| 1977.10 | Thu Oct 10 1991 11:39 | engineering's response | 146 lines |
TOPIC | 1992.0 | COMPUTE fails with /INST=NODEC on COBOL V4.4 |
| 1992.2 | Wed Oct 30 1991 16:21 | maybe I'm missing something | 5 lines |
TOPIC | 1995.0 | 50% increase in CPU time after upgrade from COBOL V4.3 to V4.4 |
| 1995.1 | Tue Nov 05 1991 09:27 | need more information | 20 lines |
| 1995.3 | Tue Nov 05 1991 12:20 | maybe take this off-line for faster turnaround? | 19 lines |
TOPIC | 2000.0 | Another COMPUTE with ROUNDED, /INST=NODECIMAL question |
| 2000.2 | Thu Nov 07 1991 10:54 | its a bug... | 18 lines |
TOPIC | 2011.0 | add to consecutive receiving fields generates incorrect results |
| 2011.4 | Thu Dec 05 1991 11:23 | been a bug since V4.2 | 6 lines |
TOPIC | 2017.0 | performanca on idexes with cobol 4.4 |
| 2017.1 | Wed Dec 04 1991 10:00 | need clarification | 10 lines |
TOPIC | 2022.0 | What is the best replacement for packed decimal code? |
| 2022.4 | Thu Dec 05 1991 12:59 | please use /INST=NODEC with COMP datatype | 5 lines |