TOPIC | 173.0 | Why are X/DECwindows/Motif headers not C++-palatable? |
| 173.31 | Fri Jul 10 1992 18:40 | Re: Compilation errors in Xlib.h? | 46 lines |
TOPIC | 210.0 | C++ initialization and call-in library interfaces |
| 210.11 | Mon Jan 06 1992 15:12 | Re: C++ initialization and call-in library interfaces | 15 lines |
TOPIC | 491.0 | C++ with WINDOWS |
| 491.12 | Wed Jan 08 1992 15:22 | Re: C++ with WINDOWS | 21 lines |
TOPIC | 500.0 | Some template bugs |
| 500.2 | Wed Nov 20 1991 03:21 | Re: Some template bugs | 20 lines |
TOPIC | 507.0 | SEGV in malloc. |
| 507.2 | Wed Nov 27 1991 19:51 | You're probably stepping on malloc's data | 30 lines |
TOPIC | 513.0 | NIHCL and Interviews for DEC C++ |
| 513.11 | Thu Dec 05 1991 15:41 | Re: NIHCL and Interviews for DEC C++ | 28 lines |
TOPIC | 520.0 | Pointer to member "referenced without an object" |
| 520.10 | Wed Dec 11 1991 15:41 | Re: pointer to class member functions? | 92 lines |
TOPIC | 528.0 | Can we get an emacs lisp ladbx.el? |
| 528.2 | Tue Dec 17 1991 17:31 | Need more details | 10 lines |
TOPIC | 543.0 | Calling C++ Library from 'CC' ? |
| 543.4 | Tue Jan 07 1992 14:42 | Use cxx to link the binary | 17 lines |
TOPIC | 544.0 | << streams fails |
| 544.1 | Tue Jan 07 1992 14:52 | This is a feature of AT&T iostream | 12 lines |
TOPIC | 561.0 | strange ladebug error message |
| 561.1 | Fri Jan 24 1992 21:21 | Re: strange ladebug error message | 25 lines |
TOPIC | 566.0 | lex & ladebug |
| 566.1 | Tue Jan 28 1992 14:02 | Re: lex & ladebug | 33 lines |
TOPIC | 570.0 | Help wanted with ladbx and InterViews. |
| 570.1 | Thu Jan 30 1992 15:51 | Re: Help wanted with ladbx and InterViews. | 20 lines |
TOPIC | 572.0 | Code optimization/generation questions... |
| 572.4 | Thu Jan 30 1992 18:11 | Re: Code optimization/generation questions... | 28 lines |
TOPIC | 573.0 | Template-name rejected as type-specifier within template class |
| 573.3 | Sat Feb 01 1992 09:31 | Re: Templates problem | 32 lines |
TOPIC | 603.0 | exit() and nothing happens ? |
| 603.2 | Thu Feb 27 1992 18:41 | Re: exit() and nothing happens ? | 22 lines |
TOPIC | 666.0 | Portable method to copy files |
| 666.2 | Tue Apr 14 1992 01:11 | Re: Portable method to copy files | 26 lines |
| 666.10 | Mon Nov 30 1992 20:01 | You can dump streambuf to ostream | 17 lines |
TOPIC | 671.0 | atomic bit set operation? |
| 671.2 | Thu Apr 16 1992 12:10 | Re: atomic bit set operation? | 23 lines |
TOPIC | 684.0 | answer: probably no |
| 684.2 | Fri Apr 24 1992 18:30 | Re: answer: probably no | 36 lines |
TOPIC | 697.0 | Wildcards don't work when system() called from cxx |
| 697.3 | Thu May 21 1992 19:00 | POSIX is to blame | 14 lines |
TOPIC | 715.0 | DEC C++ rejects template type-arguments as class-names |
| 715.1 | Wed May 06 1992 18:40 | template foo<class x> could still accept foo<int> | 18 lines |
| 715.6 | Thu May 07 1992 15:20 | see 715.1 | 15 lines |
TOPIC | 723.0 | No global space, -G 0 exhausted??! |
| 723.3 | Wed Jun 17 1992 16:20 | Looks like misinterpretation of _pctype | 26 lines |
TOPIC | 733.0 | Constructors, default values, extensibility[, and sharable images] |
| 733.14 | Wed May 27 1992 23:00 | Re: Constructors, default values, and extensibility | 48 lines |
| 733.18 | Thu May 28 1992 18:50 | DSO factoids | 32 lines |
TOPIC | 845.0 | Ladbx & Fortran & C++ |
| 845.2 | Thu Aug 06 1992 04:30 | Well it supports Fortran better than dbx does DEC C++ | 12 lines |
| 845.5 | Wed Sep 09 1992 13:11 | Re: Ladbx & Fortran & C++ | 17 lines |
| 845.7 | Thu Sep 10 1992 16:51 | If we told you the strategy then we'd have to kill you :-) | 11 lines |
TOPIC | 871.0 | machine-level debugging |
| 871.1 | Thu Aug 20 1992 20:21 | Use help m in ladbx | 18 lines |
TOPIC | 874.0 | Dangling Pointers Interacting with LADBX |
| 874.3 | Tue Aug 25 1992 23:31 | What does the core file point at? | 17 lines |
TOPIC | 880.0 | What does DEC C++ not support from ARM? |
| 880.1 | Fri Aug 28 1992 00:41 | Re: What does DEC C++ not support from ARM? | 14 lines |
TOPIC | 1833.0 | How do I set a watchpoint in ladebug? |
| 1833.2 | Tue Dec 17 1991 02:51 | Re: ladebug & cmd line parameters | 26 lines |
TOPIC | 23.0 | Cannot ladbx DEC C++ server |
| 23.2 | Mon Feb 24 1992 18:31 | Re: Cannot ladbx DEC C++ server | 16 lines |
TOPIC | 24.0 | memory problem |
| 24.2 | Sat Feb 29 1992 09:11 | Re: memory problem | 15 lines |
TOPIC | 41.0 | Using ladbx to introduce faults into a class. |
| 41.1 | Mon Apr 06 1992 18:51 | Re: Using ladbx to introduce faults into a class. | 24 lines |
TOPIC | 42.0 | const initialization |
| 42.2 | Tue Apr 07 1992 20:01 | Re: const initialization | 27 lines |
TOPIC | 67.0 | To wrecklessly go where no would dare: C++ in the kernel |
| 67.1 | Thu Jun 11 1992 00:01 | Just a few gotcha's | 28 lines |
TOPIC | 68.0 | static members which are pointers |
| 68.1 | Wed Jun 10 1992 22:51 | ::* doesn't mean what you think it means. | 13 lines |
TOPIC | 72.0 | Problems converting from ATT C++ |
| 72.2 | Mon Jun 15 1992 18:51 | Wrong suffix! | 12 lines |
TOPIC | 76.0 | ladbx and fork() |
| 76.1 | Fri Jun 19 1992 19:01 | Looks like V1.2 bug. Please QAR | 8 lines |
TOPIC | 82.0 | CXX compiler dies in ugen & as(1)? |
| 82.4 | Wed Jul 15 1992 17:41 | Submit a QAR | 10 lines |
TOPIC | 92.0 | <opaque> in ladbx |
| 92.1 | Tue Aug 04 1992 16:51 | Re: <opaque> in ladbx | 22 lines |
TOPIC | 98.0 | linker leaves partial executable |
| 98.1 | Thu Aug 13 1992 15:01 | Kinda sorta a feature | 9 lines |
| 98.4 | Fri Aug 14 1992 17:41 | This feature seems to have bit-rotted | 23 lines |
TOPIC | 151.0 | ladbx(1) suggestions/comments |
| 151.1 | Fri Oct 23 1992 14:51 | Yes, enter a qar/spr | 6 lines |
TOPIC | 158.0 | ladbx calling overloaded functions |
| 158.1 | Wed Oct 28 1992 13:41 | Re: ladbx calling overloaded functions | 25 lines |
TOPIC | 172.0 | 4.2 or 4.3 linker ?? |
| 172.4 | Thu Nov 12 1992 11:51 | Looks like no symbolic information for that address | 15 lines |
TOPIC | 1994.0 | SunOS - ULTRIX Exec Sizes |
| 1994.7 | Thu Dec 19 1991 11:30 | High calorie symbol tables | 18 lines |
TOPIC | 7265.0 | Utility or routine todump call stack? |
| 7265.4 | Wed Nov 27 1991 17:30 | Not too hard -- but not guaranteed to work with shared libraries | 36 lines |
TOPIC | 7541.0 | gp relocation out-of-range again |
| 7541.4 | Mon Dec 30 1991 15:00 | -G 0 should work | 14 lines |
TOPIC | 7832.0 | f77 or c89 switch for crt0.o vs pcrt0.o |
| 7832.1 | Fri Jan 31 1992 03:30 | Re: f77 or c89 switch for crt0.o vs pcrt0.o | 18 lines |
TOPIC | 8435.0 | as1: macro instr.used $at ? |
| 8435.1 | Wed Apr 01 1992 23:49 | Re: as1: macro instr.used $at ? | 18 lines |
TOPIC | 9161.0 | ld -A fails on V4.2, does it work? |
| 9161.1 | Fri Jun 19 1992 22:19 | Re: ld -A fails on V4.2, does it work? | 20 lines |