Conference | Total Posts | Conference Title |
---|---|---|
turris::decladebug | 9 | Digital Ladebug debugger |
turris::digital_unix | 6 | DIGITAL UNIX (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DEC OSF/1) |
turris::alpha_l | 6 | Alpha_L |
turris::decc | 2 | DECC |
turris::decc_bugs | 2 | DEC C Problem Reporting Forum |
turris::dec_fortran_alpha | 1 | DEC Fortran on ALPHA |
turris::fortran | 1 | Digital Fortran |
TOPIC | 2159.0 | assembly code from source code....? | ||
2159.2 | Wed May 31 1995 13:06 | is this what you wanted | 4 lines |
TOPIC | 894.0 | cc has trouble with sequence of evaluating the following expression | ||
894.12 | Thu Jun 15 1995 17:28 | interesting legalese, but what is the more intuitive result? | 26 lines | |
TOPIC | 1021.0 | asm() and test-and-set | ||
1021.8 | Mon Jul 17 1995 18:43 | response to .1 and .2 | 61 lines | |
1021.9 | Mon Jul 17 1995 18:55 | correct examples for c_asm.h | 118 lines | |
1021.11 | Tue Jul 18 1995 19:50 | Thanks for catching this | 2 lines | |
TOPIC | 1056.0 | can we run a C executable of osf3.0 on osf 2.0 ? | ||
1056.2 | Thu Jun 15 1995 16:48 | how does this affect sales of new versions | 2 lines | |
TOPIC | 6920.0 | CSH/cd logs out on error | ||
6920.4 | Thu Oct 10 1996 16:52 | a consise example | 13 lines |
TOPIC | 1240.0 | too many load/store | ||
1240.5 | Tue May 09 1995 12:21 | a .i file (generated with -P) would be ideal | 0 lines | |
TOPIC | 1444.0 | %CC-W-UNKMSGID, Unknown message id or group "ASMRAWREG" is ignored. | ||
1444.8 | Thu Sep 21 1995 11:01 | why this message is important | 49 lines |
TOPIC | 902.0 | Can't disable another new compiler warning | ||
902.4 | Wed Apr 26 1995 12:17 | Pay attention to the warning | 4 lines | |
TOPIC | 1022.0 | Thu Oct 05 1995 11:28 | plus list alignment faults in BL32h-based DECC | 37 lines |
TOPIC | 241.0 | Tue May 23 1995 15:53 | differences between decladebug and dbx regarding file scope | 142 lines |
241.1 | Tue May 23 1995 16:12 | more info | 11 lines | |
241.3 | Tue Sep 19 1995 15:49 | How about BLISS | 11 lines | |
241.12 | Wed Sep 27 1995 13:54 | This is great! | 10 lines | |
241.13 | Mon Oct 09 1995 18:56 | Can I have a date | 15 lines | |
241.15 | Wed Oct 11 1995 11:59 | Thanks, I've pulled it over | 2 lines | |
TOPIC | 288.0 | Fri Aug 18 1995 14:00 | Some anomalies concerning typedef information in stabs | 286 lines |
288.2 | Wed Sep 27 1995 13:59 | Paul WInalski's email reply | 48 lines | |
TOPIC | 322.0 | Thu Oct 12 1995 15:33 | decladebug cannot set a breakpoint in main() if it was compiled -g0 | 25 lines |
TOPIC | 1190.0 | f77 -S = no local symbols? | ||
1190.5 | Sun Feb 23 1997 10:17 | feature, not a bug (although a front-end improvement would help) | 37 lines |
TOPIC | 33.0 | Shared Libraries and Symbol Premption | ||
33.1 | Wed Feb 15 1995 10:29 | Competetive analysis of -O level/symbol preemption interaction | 136 lines | |
33.2 | Wed Feb 22 1995 13:55 | More competive analysis: -O without a level | 7 lines | |
33.3 | Wed Feb 22 1995 13:59 | more competitive analysis: SGI and acc results | 37 lines | |
TOPIC | 50.0 | OSF Platinum: cc -x generates .o files with locally stripped symtab | ||
50.4 | Fri Dec 09 1994 15:58 | ersatz meeting minutes | 44 lines | |
TOPIC | 51.0 | Wed Feb 22 1995 14:19 | Competitive analysis of -O levels offered (and other optimization controls) | 377 lines |
51.1 | Wed Feb 22 1995 14:23 | more on-line documentation on HP's optimizations | 536 lines |
First Post: | Fri Dec 09 1994 |
Last Post: | Sun Feb 23 1997 |
# Topics: | 5 |
# Replies: | 22 |
# We have note bodies for: | 1 |