TOPIC | 20.0 | LOCATION of Phase V General Description |
| 20.25 | Tue May 24 1988 18:42 | | 1 lines |
TOPIC | 45.0 | Class II LLC? |
| 45.1 | Wed Mar 16 1988 10:19 | Probably never | 3 lines |
| 45.4 | Wed Mar 16 1988 12:58 | ...what evil lurks in the heart of standards committees? | 12 lines |
TOPIC | 98.0 | Is It a PhaseV or PhaseIV Frame |
| 98.1 | Mon Mar 20 1989 17:54 | I may have even gotten it right! | 23 lines |
TOPIC | 101.0 | NSAP changes, autoconfiguration |
| 101.2 | Wed Mar 29 1989 10:42 | It is a requirement | 20 lines |
| 101.5 | Thu Mar 30 1989 10:32 | Anything can be mismanaged | 3 lines |
TOPIC | 126.0 | Phase V Protocol Towers. |
| 126.3 | Mon Jun 19 1989 16:20 | It probably *is* suitable for what you want... | 33 lines |
TOPIC | 222.0 | Cross-posting from DNS_PROGRAM conference |
| 222.1 | Thu Feb 22 1990 09:11 | Falsification of DNS node object attributes. | 19 lines |
TOPIC | 297.0 | Use of DNS questions |
| 297.1 | Mon Jun 18 1990 16:30 | Not exactly. | 38 lines |
| 297.2 | Mon Jun 18 1990 17:10 | P.S. The directory name is "DNA_BackTranslation" | 0 lines |
| 297.5 | Tue Jun 19 1990 13:46 | Yes. | 4 lines |
TOPIC | 1.0 | Welcome |
| 1.10 | Mon Oct 16 1989 19:14 | FIles::Net$Arch:[Approved] | 0 lines |
| 1.12 | Tue Oct 17 1989 10:25 | Somebody should teach that guy how to type. | 6 lines |
| 1.13 | Tue Oct 17 1989 10:33 | Order no. | 4 lines |
TOPIC | 56.0 | datagrams for decnet |
| 56.10 | Thu May 18 1989 18:34 | Important assumptions were not stated | 40 lines |
| 56.15 | Fri May 19 1989 11:59 | Additional services useful, but... | 55 lines |
TOPIC | 99.0 | In memory corruptions... |
| 99.4 | Mon May 02 1988 11:09 | | 20 lines |
| 99.6 | Mon May 02 1988 13:34 | | 12 lines |
TOPIC | 108.0 | Routers overloaded listening to end node hellos |
| 108.1 | Thu May 26 1988 10:49 | Multicast doesn't scale | 8 lines |
TOPIC | 133.0 | Multicasting |
| 133.1 | Tue Dec 06 1988 09:41 | | 35 lines |
TOPIC | 137.0 | SNAP user data len |
| 137.1 | Thu Dec 22 1988 15:31 | you are | 2 lines |
TOPIC | 139.0 | SNAP xid/test response |
| 139.1 | Mon Jan 09 1989 12:28 | | 20 lines |
TOPIC | 171.0 | GSAPS in LLC class 1? |
| 171.2 | Fri Jul 14 1989 16:01 | They don't call them SAPs for nothing. | 10 lines |
TOPIC | 205.0 | discrepancy in NSP doc. |
| 205.1 | Mon Apr 30 1990 10:19 | "New" in number only | 4 lines |
| 205.3 | Mon Apr 30 1990 11:22 | 4.0.1 corresponds to the implementations (except for version number) | 0 lines |
TOPIC | 214.0 | DDCMP message processing ? |
| 214.1 | Mon Jul 30 1990 18:47 | Are you sure about the message sequence? | 6 lines |
| 214.3 | Tue Jul 31 1990 11:41 | That explains it. | 5 lines |
TOPIC | 219.0 | DNA Functional Specs |
| 219.1 | Wed Sep 26 1990 13:57 | See topic 1 | 0 lines |
TOPIC | 4.0 | Who are we? |
| 4.8 | Mon Mar 07 1988 10:27 | | 12 lines |
TOPIC | 8.0 | What is NSP's end-to-end timeout policy ? |
| 8.1 | Mon Mar 07 1988 11:01 | Very interesting | 30 lines |
TOPIC | 9.0 | Cross sub-channel ACKs |
| 9.2 | Wed Apr 20 1988 20:28 | cross-sub-channel-intra-pseudo-pre-layer ack | 28 lines |
TOPIC | 13.0 | credit vs. on/off flow control |
| 13.2 | Mon May 09 1988 15:12 | Each has its merits | 26 lines |
| 13.4 | Mon May 09 1988 16:39 | | 9 lines |
| 13.6 | Wed May 11 1988 15:03 | Too difficult for me! | 21 lines |
TOPIC | 14.0 | NSP Interrupt Channel can be hogged |
| 14.4 | Fri Jul 01 1988 16:09 | | 11 lines |
TOPIC | 15.0 | Can NCL delete TP Ports ? |
| 15.3 | Tue Jul 12 1988 15:52 | Sounds like an architecture issue | 5 lines |
| 15.6 | Mon Nov 14 1988 10:08 | | 3 lines |
| 15.9 | Mon Nov 14 1988 13:00 | I was hoping nobody would notice... | 5 lines |
| 15.11 | Mon Nov 14 1988 17:45 | Yes | 3 lines |
TOPIC | 17.0 | NSP and Tinygrams |
| 17.1 | Wed Jul 20 1988 11:16 | Belongs in the application | 23 lines |
| 17.4 | Thu Jul 21 1988 12:32 | Not quite | 13 lines |
| 17.9 | Fri Jul 22 1988 11:15 | Assorted comments | 24 lines |
| 17.18 | Mon Jul 25 1988 11:18 | In general | 33 lines |
TOPIC | 23.0 | Lost "confidence", question |
| 23.3 | Wed Feb 22 1989 18:10 | Yes | 11 lines |
| 23.5 | Fri Feb 24 1989 09:22 | | 53 lines |
| 23.7 | Fri Feb 24 1989 10:38 | I agree | 3 lines |
TOPIC | 24.0 | NSP: On a returned CI.... |
| 24.1 | Fri Feb 24 1989 09:02 | | 8 lines |
TOPIC | 26.0 | NSP Entities are changing? |
| 26.1 | Thu May 18 1989 18:57 | | 8 lines |
| 26.3 | Fri May 19 1989 12:14 | Is this a realistic network? | 6 lines |
TOPIC | 28.0 | NSP Congestion Detection is Faulty |
| 28.5 | Mon May 14 1990 10:12 | Trickier than it looks | 20 lines |
TOPIC | 29.0 | XOFF should cause window adjustment |
| 29.7 | Fri Jul 14 1989 13:10 | But what is the correct recommendation? | 10 lines |
TOPIC | 30.0 | T4.2.0 nits and questions |
| 30.3 | Fri Jul 14 1989 14:53 | | 74 lines |
TOPIC | 33.0 | Xoff or not Xoff ? |
| 33.3 | Fri Jul 14 1989 15:07 | | 3 lines |
TOPIC | 35.0 | NSPdelay (delay factor) question |
| 35.12 | Fri Dec 01 1989 10:30 | | 3 lines |
TOPIC | 37.0 | Comments on Phase V NSP spec (since "implementors hang out here") |
| 37.8 | Tue May 01 1990 15:34 | Here is a draft
| 939 lines |
| 37.11 | Mon May 07 1990 10:51 | Bug. | 2 lines |
| 37.12 | Tue May 08 1990 12:33 | Here's an updated version | 947 lines |
| 37.15 | Wed May 09 1990 11:42 | Management issues | 114 lines |
| 37.16 | Thu May 10 1990 17:12 | Here's another try. | 953 lines |
| 37.20 | Mon May 14 1990 09:59 | Consequence of Max. NSAPs = 0 | 21 lines |
| 37.23 | Thu May 17 1990 09:01 | The whys | 5 lines |
| 37.25 | Thu May 17 1990 11:01 | Why? | 3 lines |
| 37.27 | Fri May 18 1990 09:27 | Okay. (But I can't resist putting in one more comment.) | 18 lines |
TOPIC | 38.0 | Error in NSP T4.2.0 |
| 38.1 | Tue Feb 13 1990 11:23 | That's an implementation bug. However, if everyone agrees to the change... | 10 lines |
TOPIC | 39.0 | Wed Aug 01 1990 13:22 | NSP version T4.2.1 | 71 lines |
| 39.3 | Thu Oct 04 1990 10:07 | Didn't Bush say, "No new taxes and management parameters!" | 35 lines |
TOPIC | 40.0 | Link service XON/XOFF changed in same segment |
| 40.1 | Tue Aug 07 1990 19:23 | No way. | 6 lines |
| 40.8 | Thu Aug 09 1990 18:48 | Performance is likely to go down, not up. | 17 lines |
TOPIC | 41.0 | NSP Port State should show through to NETMAN |
| 41.1 | Fri Oct 05 1990 09:08 | Why don't you look at the Session Control ports? | 4 lines |