| TOPIC | 635.0 | Modify vs erase to improve performance |
| 635.5 | Thu Feb 22 1990 10:52 | You are right. | 22 lines |
| TOPIC | 849.0 | RDO vs RDML/PASCAL in time and BLR need expl.. |
| 849.16 | Tue Feb 20 1990 11:39 | And a performance proposal as well. | 4 lines |
| TOPIC | 906.0 | Database Obsolete after RMU/CONVERT |
| 906.6 | Tue Feb 20 1990 10:59 | Yep, thats the case. | 5 lines |
| TOPIC | 934.0 | Fldnotcrs, ... from union + order by? |
| 934.2 | Tue Feb 20 1990 11:08 | Shouldn't really be allowed at all. | 25 lines |
| TOPIC | 938.0 | DB physical design issues ... |
| 938.2 | Tue Feb 20 1990 11:26 | But beware of under estimates. | 16 lines |
| 938.4 | Wed Feb 21 1990 10:57 | From me. | 13 lines |
| TOPIC | 942.0 | VMS and RDB versions |
| 942.6 | Tue Feb 20 1990 11:35 | If view then convert to base table. | 9 lines |
| TOPIC | 944.0 | Another possible RMU/CONVERT problem |
| 944.1 | Tue Feb 20 1990 11:46 | One more observation. | 11 lines |
| TOPIC | 950.0 | Performance questions |
| 950.5 | Wed Feb 21 1990 11:04 | Highwatermark also negligable !? | 8 lines |
| TOPIC | 956.0 | RMU/SHOW stat not working |
| 956.4 | Wed Feb 21 1990 11:16 | How do you spell MOVE (COPY or Export). | 8 lines |
| TOPIC | 971.0 | possible with a trigger? |
| 971.4 | Fri Feb 23 1990 09:49 | Maybe try RDO definition instead. | 33 lines |
| TOPIC | 973.0 | flush out buffers?? |
| 973.5 | Fri Feb 23 1990 09:58 | Make sure to absorb overhead first. | 25 lines |
| TOPIC | 974.0 | constraints optimisation on erase ? |
| 974.1 | Fri Feb 23 1990 10:05 | Constraints ok but triggers are better. | 39 lines |
| TOPIC | 978.0 | How to interpret RMU/ANA/AREA=/OPTION=FULL |
| 978.1 | Fri Feb 23 1990 10:16 | Ignore the first diagram. | 32 lines |