TOPIC | 2954.0 | Is VAX C callable? |
| 2954.5 | Fri Jun 15 1990 15:01 | I was hoping for something like VAXC$COMPILE(file, argvector) | 9 lines |
TOPIC | 3136.0 | behavior of '\' continuation character |
| 3136.3 | Mon Sep 10 1990 12:55 | yeah, but that makes life tougher for no reason | 15 lines |
TOPIC | 3424.0 | VAX C/VMS V3.2 is now available |
| 3424.15 | Fri Nov 22 1991 10:46 | Any inlining bugs in V3.2? | 10 lines |
TOPIC | 3910.0 | Is ppl$read_semaphore documentation wrong? |
| 3910.2 | Wed Aug 14 1991 10:03 | an answer anyway | 15 lines |
TOPIC | 3951.0 | Help scare a customer |
| 3951.2 | Thu Aug 29 1991 12:58 | | 3 lines |
| 3951.9 | Fri Aug 30 1991 16:36 | not so brilliant | 23 lines |
TOPIC | 3979.0 | DEC C RTL T5.X Field Test Now Available |
| 3979.12 | Wed Sep 18 1991 17:42 | can see both sides | 10 lines |
TOPIC | 4001.0 | malloc() and friends in DEC C RTL/VMS V5.x |
| 4001.6 | Thu Sep 26 1991 14:09 | quadword = 8 bytes | 13 lines |
TOPIC | 4034.0 | Operator Precedense for && and || |
| 4034.1 | Fri Oct 11 1991 18:42 | misinterpretation | 15 lines |
TOPIC | 4124.0 | Wed Nov 20 1991 14:52 | inlining optimization bug fixed in VAX C V3.2 ?? | 26 lines |
TOPIC | 4129.0 | perror giving a EBUSY occasionally on an fwrite. |
| 4129.2 | Wed Nov 27 1991 10:58 | using ASTs maybe? | 5 lines |
TOPIC | 4254.0 | string to upper (/lower) routine? |
| 4254.8 | Wed Feb 12 1992 13:23 | _toupper and _tolower assume: | 10 lines |
TOPIC | 371.0 | Proposed DCL syntax for NIDL compiler (DEC RPC V2.0) |
| 371.2 | Thu Aug 09 1990 09:45 | | 55 lines |
| 371.3 | Thu Aug 09 1990 10:10 | clarification (I think) | 41 lines |
| 371.7 | Thu Aug 16 1990 19:24 | some more info | 38 lines |
| 371.12 | Wed Sep 05 1990 12:44 | | 34 lines |
TOPIC | 382.0 | Proposed DCL syntax for UUID utility (DEC RPC V2.0) |
| 382.2 | Fri Sep 21 1990 14:46 | a different RPC, I believe | 11 lines |
| 382.6 | Wed Sep 26 1990 15:43 | We want to keep NIDL and UUID as verbs | 57 lines |
| 382.8 | Fri Oct 05 1990 12:17 | **friendly** discussion on DCL conventions | 59 lines |
| 382.12 | Mon Nov 19 1990 10:39 | IDENTIFIER preferred over GENERATE | 13 lines |
| 382.13 | Mon Nov 19 1990 10:53 | Modified proposal for IDENTIFIER verb for DRB consideration | 54 lines |
| 382.15 | Tue Nov 20 1990 15:47 | advantage in default behavior | 13 lines |
TOPIC | 473.0 | Thu Sep 12 1991 09:37 | request reopening #371: verb change from NIDL to IDL | 16 lines |
| 473.2 | Fri Sep 13 1991 12:50 | thanks | 8 lines |
TOPIC | 474.0 | Thu Sep 12 1991 09:49 | request reopening #382: keyword change from NIDL to IDL | 12 lines |
| 474.1 | Thu Sep 12 1991 09:53 | resubmission with NIDL to IDL change | 53 lines |
TOPIC | 478.0 | Fri Sep 13 1991 18:22 | should "NIDL_TO_IDL" have a DCL syntax? | 32 lines |
| 478.3 | Mon Sep 16 1991 17:04 | IDL/CONVERT it is | 14 lines |
TOPIC | 479.0 | Mon Sep 16 1991 18:37 | proposed IDL/CONVERT syntax | 31 lines |
| 479.3 | Tue Sep 17 1991 09:49 | ACF file qualifier issues | 19 lines |
TOPIC | 117.0 | Limits on identifier lengths |
| 117.11 | Fri Sep 28 1990 17:43 | NIDL would catch this problem | 42 lines |
| 117.13 | Tue Oct 02 1990 15:36 | dependency on C compiler for now | 22 lines |
| 117.14 | Tue Oct 02 1990 15:42 | not limiting people | 16 lines |
| 117.16 | Thu Oct 04 1990 16:18 | How many shops won't already have C? | 33 lines |
TOPIC | 136.0 | Binop_fw example - syntax errors w/NIDL |
| 136.3 | Wed Nov 21 1990 10:58 | two problems | 11 lines |
TOPIC | 145.0 | Pool of synch servers? |
| 145.1 | Thu Nov 29 1990 11:50 | here's one shot at it | 22 lines |
TOPIC | 151.0 | DECrpc V2.0 Packaging |
| 151.1 | Mon Dec 17 1990 09:58 | depends on what you're looking for, FT or released version | 6 lines |
TOPIC | 162.0 | Presentation layer services (like XDR) available? |
| 162.10 | Wed Mar 13 1991 11:14 | NDR data not self describing | 8 lines |
TOPIC | 164.0 | RPCs for Message Passing? |
| 164.4 | Tue Jan 22 1991 11:55 | asynchrony = threads | 11 lines |
TOPIC | 172.0 | NIDL produces lines longer than VAXC accepts |
| 172.1 | Tue Feb 05 1991 15:37 | supposed to be fixed | 5 lines |
TOPIC | 182.0 | Optimization Clarification, please |
| 182.1 | Wed Mar 13 1991 15:32 | data conversions a small part of the potential reduction | 24 lines |
| 182.6 | Thu Mar 14 1991 11:38 | I'd suggest trying DECRPC and see if performance is acceptable | 39 lines |
TOPIC | 184.0 | Examples for variable length arrays |
| 184.7 | Fri Oct 04 1991 12:10 | clarification, maybe | 59 lines |
| 184.8 | Fri Oct 04 1991 12:16 | good ole C syntax | 28 lines |
| 184.11 | Mon Oct 07 1991 10:55 | got me | 20 lines |
| 184.13 | Tue Oct 08 1991 14:29 | seeing the light | 25 lines |
| 184.15 | Wed Oct 09 1991 14:15 | | 2 lines |
| 184.20 | Tue Apr 28 1992 15:38 | C accepts the same def as IDL (minus attrs, of course) | 39 lines |
| 184.22 | Wed Apr 29 1992 09:48 | yes, very | 8 lines |
| 184.23 | Wed Apr 29 1992 15:26 | Incorrect syntax for pointer to conformant array | 14 lines |
TOPIC | 189.0 | NIDL: 2 code bugs |
| 189.2 | Wed Mar 27 1991 13:21 | V1 => different support channels | 5 lines |
TOPIC | 203.0 | Question for IDL programmers
|
| 203.1 | Wed May 08 1991 12:21 | import "common.idl"; | 18 lines |
TOPIC | 243.0 | Uniqueness of procedure names |
| 243.2 | Tue Sep 03 1991 14:55 | IDL compiler change is necessary | 39 lines |
TOPIC | 281.0 | Mystery error |
| 281.3 | Wed Nov 06 1991 11:32 | default behavior might differ across components | 8 lines |
TOPIC | 287.0 | NIDL ERROR.Am i doing something silly. |
| 287.2 | Mon Nov 18 1991 13:23 | wrong symbol definition, maybe? | 8 lines |
TOPIC | 290.0 | DECrpc or DaSL |
| 290.13 | Wed Apr 08 1992 16:29 | what chunk size? | 9 lines |
| 290.15 | Fri Apr 10 1992 12:47 | there is a "magic number" | 18 lines |
TOPIC | 297.0 | default in a union doesn't work. |
| 297.1 | Fri Dec 06 1991 12:33 | wrong conference | 6 lines |
TOPIC | 306.0 | context rundown procedure questions ? |
| 306.1 | Fri Dec 20 1991 11:18 | | 28 lines |
TOPIC | 312.0 | problem passing a byte array greater than 5200 |
| 312.6 | Tue Feb 04 1992 14:28 | | 24 lines |
TOPIC | 327.0 | Netwise RPC-->OSF RPC migration? |
| 327.3 | Thu Jan 30 1992 15:31 | transmit_as feature | 16 lines |
TOPIC | 329.0 | Possible IDL bug: -no_warn is ignored |
| 329.1 | Thu Jan 30 1992 16:39 | explanation | 90 lines |
| 329.3 | Tue Feb 25 1992 13:23 | more ramblings | 63 lines |
TOPIC | 353.0 | IDL questions |
| 353.6 | Wed Apr 08 1992 16:15 | more on multidim and conformance | 15 lines |
TOPIC | 387.0 | 4gl callouts using RPC |
| 387.1 | Fri May 29 1992 12:26 | possible; non-trivial | 21 lines |
TOPIC | 393.0 | Longs Declarations and IDL and RPC on Alpha |
| 393.1 | Fri Jun 12 1992 16:35 | mechanism already in place | 9 lines |
TOPIC | 70.0 | C compiler differences |
| 70.19 | Thu Apr 05 1990 12:20 | | 12 lines |
TOPIC | 119.0 | dcp and trying to avoid reinventing the wheel |
| 119.4 | Fri Jun 14 1991 12:14 | possible help | 19 lines |
TOPIC | 160.0 | VMS QIO services in ULTRIX |
| 160.12 | Thu Sep 26 1991 13:58 | CLT::CORE_SERVICES_RTL | 0 lines |
TOPIC | 223.0 | vt user simulator ? |
| 223.2 | Thu Jul 05 1990 18:21 | Remote Terminal Emulator? | 8 lines |
TOPIC | 232.0 | PORTING VMS SERVICE CALLS TO ULTRIX |
| 232.1 | Mon Aug 20 1990 17:23 | PLIB | 4 lines |
TOPIC | 259.0 | Internationalization of Messages in U*? |
| 259.4 | Mon Oct 29 1990 17:27 | one limited solution | 10 lines |
| 259.9 | Tue Aug 13 1991 14:23 | solution in .4 still in use | 140 lines |
TOPIC | 263.0 | Porting database applications |
| 263.5 | Tue Nov 06 1990 13:21 | on the DEC RPC alternative | 20 lines |
TOPIC | 273.0 | macro that accept/pass variable # arguments |
| 273.3 | Tue Dec 11 1990 15:33 | parenthesized list = one macro argument | 11 lines |
TOPIC | 300.0 | Thu May 09 1991 15:49 | unexplained pclose behavior | 35 lines |
| 300.1 | Thu May 09 1991 16:57 | popen.c | 85 lines |
| 300.3 | Fri May 10 1991 13:00 | thanks; follow-ups | 30 lines |
| 300.4 | Fri May 10 1991 14:35 | more info | 16 lines |
TOPIC | 356.0 | i/o multiplexing and asynchronous i/o completion |
| 356.4 | Fri Feb 07 1992 17:40 | we might have kernel threads for all our major platforms soon | 7 lines |