TOPIC | 858.0 | Reigning or consorting? |
| 858.4 | Tue Sep 17 1991 16:18 | An entry shifting squeeze | 39 lines |
| 858.7 | Wed Sep 18 1991 10:11 | | 31 lines |
TOPIC | 859.0 | simple bidding question |
| 859.4 | Tue Sep 17 1991 16:19 | 1N should be overwhelming favorite | 0 lines |
| 859.10 | Wed Sep 18 1991 10:23 | Too many subtleties, so little time | 23 lines |
TOPIC | 860.0 | Wed Sep 18 1991 12:19 | The ultimate limits | 22 lines |
| 860.2 | Thu Sep 19 1991 11:02 | Good job | 42 lines |
TOPIC | 862.0 | Wed Sep 18 1991 15:58 | Can you make 6NT - a repost | 28 lines |
| 862.2 | Thu Sep 19 1991 11:06 | Right again | 17 lines |
TOPIC | 864.0 | still looking for bidding advice . . . |
| 864.6 | Fri Sep 20 1991 17:48 | Heard of Kickback? | 20 lines |
TOPIC | 866.0 | bidding problem from Hudson sectional |
| 866.1 | Mon Sep 23 1991 14:31 | | 12 lines |
| 866.9 | Tue Sep 24 1991 12:02 | | 11 lines |
| 866.14 | Wed Sep 25 1991 12:15 | | 19 lines |
TOPIC | 867.0 | Competing with a two-suiter |
| 867.5 | Tue Sep 24 1991 12:17 | Take the small risk | 29 lines |
| 867.7 | Wed Sep 25 1991 14:14 | Unlucky | 18 lines |
| 867.11 | Thu Sep 26 1991 12:14 | Jump shift fine if strong | 8 lines |
TOPIC | 868.0 | A probabilistic bidding problem...
|
| 868.6 | Thu Sep 26 1991 11:48 | Blackwood, the most abused convention | 21 lines |
| 868.7 | Thu Sep 26 1991 12:12 | Superdealer at work | 85 lines |
TOPIC | 869.0 | Opening lead - can you beat this slam? |
| 869.5 | Fri Sep 27 1991 13:32 | | 19 lines |
TOPIC | 870.0 | you be the judge . . . |
| 870.13 | Fri Sep 27 1991 13:45 | | 11 lines |
TOPIC | 874.0 | Pre-alerts |
| 874.2 | Thu Oct 03 1991 14:11 | | 23 lines |
TOPIC | 875.0 | How to keep-out of slam? |
| 875.1 | Fri Oct 04 1991 11:50 | Many doubtful bids | 44 lines |
TOPIC | 876.0 | Bidding vulnerable 6-5 hands |
| 876.3 | Tue Oct 08 1991 14:16 | | 9 lines |
| 876.8 | Wed Oct 09 1991 10:39 | Too much defense???? | 24 lines |
| 876.10 | Wed Oct 09 1991 13:15 | More about the 4H call | 37 lines |
| 876.12 | Thu Oct 10 1991 12:18 | Strategy changes as more info becomes available | 22 lines |
TOPIC | 879.0 | you be the judge (especially for 2/1 GF experts) |
| 879.3 | Fri Oct 11 1991 10:54 | | 31 lines |
| 879.10 | Mon Oct 14 1991 13:21 | 2/1 and Precision mix very well | 17 lines |
TOPIC | 880.0 | Play IMPs with Karl :^) |
| 880.5 | Wed Oct 16 1991 11:09 | | 18 lines |
TOPIC | 881.0 | The Wailing Wall...
|
| 881.10 | Mon Oct 21 1991 10:56 | Get a new partner | 12 lines |
TOPIC | 882.0 | Weak 2-M: advice sought |
| 882.8 | Mon Oct 21 1991 13:43 | Too bad | 20 lines |
TOPIC | 883.0 | High-level doubles |
| 883.6 | Tue Oct 22 1991 13:52 | Nothing is quite so black and white | 42 lines |
| 883.16 | Wed Oct 23 1991 11:15 | Two lead problems | 27 lines |
TOPIC | 885.0 | More high level decisions |
| 885.7 | Fri Oct 25 1991 13:36 | Three more gray hair | 23 lines |
| 885.11 | Mon Oct 28 1991 12:51 | 3 holdings, only 2 bids | 12 lines |
TOPIC | 887.0 | NAOP Session 1 hands |
| 887.2 | Mon Oct 28 1991 15:20 | My $0.02 | 30 lines |
TOPIC | 890.0 | lead/defense vs. 3NT |
| 890.3 | Wed Oct 30 1991 13:05 | | 38 lines |
| 890.6 | Thu Oct 31 1991 11:12 | Save a board, lose a partner | 40 lines |
TOPIC | 893.0 | defensive signalling question |
| 893.7 | Thu Oct 31 1991 11:22 | You SOLD OUT to 3H ??? | 13 lines |
TOPIC | 896.0 | A bidding question |
| 896.5 | Mon Nov 11 1991 12:09 | Those who live by the overbid will die by the overbid | 14 lines |
TOPIC | 897.0 | Mon Nov 11 1991 12:19 | Sunday at Danvers | 19 lines |
| 897.5 | Tue Nov 12 1991 12:57 | What actually happened ... | 30 lines |
TOPIC | 898.0 | Mon Nov 11 1991 12:24 | With open cards | 22 lines |
| 898.1 | Tue Nov 12 1991 13:03 | A hint might be in order | 10 lines |
TOPIC | 900.0 | how should we have bid these? |
| 900.6 | Tue Nov 12 1991 16:47 | Hindsight is always 20-20 | 13 lines |
TOPIC | 902.0 | responding to Precision style 2C opener . .. |
| 902.4 | Thu Nov 14 1991 11:04 | | 20 lines |
TOPIC | 905.0 | IMP hands for you |
| 905.5 | Fri Nov 15 1991 13:15 | The wrong hand is overbidding | 33 lines |
| 905.11 | Tue Nov 19 1991 13:17 | | 19 lines |
TOPIC | 906.0 | Naturalists vs Scientists Challenge Match |
| 906.10 | Thu Nov 21 1991 12:44 | Can't prove a thing | 48 lines |
TOPIC | 907.0 | Trivial hands made hard |
| 907.4 | Tue Nov 26 1991 12:42 | 1C-2N => no slam ???? | 22 lines |
TOPIC | 912.0 | Another hand with 5 spades and a longer suit |
| 912.5 | Wed Dec 04 1991 12:55 | | 16 lines |
TOPIC | 913.0 | more bad bidding from C & C |
| 913.10 | Wed Dec 04 1991 13:21 | The world would be a better place without Blackwood | 31 lines |
TOPIC | 915.0 | No-brain decision? |
| 915.7 | Fri Dec 06 1991 12:47 | | 29 lines |
TOPIC | 916.0 | Another mandatory falsecard? |
| 916.1 | Fri Dec 06 1991 13:08 | | 37 lines |
| 916.3 | Mon Dec 09 1991 12:34 | | 12 lines |
TOPIC | 917.0 | Can you and your favorite partner reliably bid this slam? |
| 917.8 | Fri Dec 06 1991 13:20 | Unusual interpretation of NMF | 16 lines |
TOPIC | 918.0 | New Minor Forcing & 4th Suit Forcing |
| 918.3 | Mon Dec 09 1991 17:06 | | 69 lines |
| 918.10 | Thu Jan 02 1992 14:05 | A little clarification | 43 lines |
| 918.12 | Thu Jan 02 1992 14:44 | With perfect cards, just maybe | 20 lines |
TOPIC | 919.0 | The natural meaning of certain bids |
| 919.4 | Wed Dec 11 1991 12:35 | A voice of dissent | 47 lines |
TOPIC | 922.0 | 1 hand - 2 problems |
| 922.8 | Thu Jan 02 1992 14:25 | | 32 lines |
TOPIC | 926.0 | Bidding problem - preempt |
| 926.1 | Mon Jan 06 1992 09:42 | | 13 lines |
TOPIC | 927.0 | A report from Newton |
| 927.3 | Mon Jan 06 1992 17:12 | Have a heart - the diamonds can wait | 24 lines |
TOPIC | 928.0 | IMP bidding problem from K.O. quarter-finals |
| 928.1 | Mon Jan 06 1992 17:15 | 4H seems about right | 0 lines |
TOPIC | 929.0 | Make this deal |
| 929.6 | Tue Jan 07 1992 12:51 | | 22 lines |
TOPIC | 931.0 | The Principle of Symmetry - fact or fiction? |
| 931.1 | Tue Jan 07 1992 15:07 | | 34 lines |
| 931.6 | Wed Jan 08 1992 13:36 | | 61 lines |
TOPIC | 932.0 | The most HCP I've ever held |
| 932.2 | Wed Jan 08 1992 13:41 | | 15 lines |
| 932.6 | Thu Jan 09 1992 13:33 | Oops | 7 lines |
TOPIC | 933.0 | Wed Jan 08 1992 13:45 | What do you bid | 17 lines |
| 933.5 | Thu Jan 09 1992 13:25 | Some clarifications | 18 lines |
| 933.9 | Fri Jan 10 1992 13:51 | And the winner is ... | 35 lines |
| 933.12 | Mon Jan 13 1992 16:55 | This is mainly my own guess, but | 24 lines |
| 933.14 | Tue Jan 14 1992 10:15 | | 41 lines |
TOPIC | 934.0 | From last night's Route 128 bridge league |
| 934.5 | Thu Jan 09 1992 13:31 | | 9 lines |
TOPIC | 939.0 | New Shark Bite Record at Cavendish: -5200 |
| 939.5 | Thu Jan 23 1992 12:53 | A little late, but ... | 11 lines |
TOPIC | 942.0 | Competitive raises - how much does responder have? |
| 942.11 | Thu Jan 23 1992 13:21 | More fuel to the fire | 34 lines |
TOPIC | 947.0 | tough high level bidding decisions |
| 947.9 | Fri Jan 31 1992 16:23 | Silence is golden, double is twice so | 24 lines |
TOPIC | 948.0 | Two bidding questions |
| 948.3 | Mon Feb 03 1992 12:26 | | 29 lines |
TOPIC | 952.0 | You be the Judge (or summon Judge Wapner!) |
| 952.9 | Wed Feb 05 1992 15:16 | A little late, but ... | 54 lines |
| 952.12 | Thu Feb 06 1992 12:35 | That is a completely different auction | 34 lines |
TOPIC | 953.0 | Bidding over 1NT |
| 953.5 | Wed Feb 05 1992 15:19 | Red on while ??? | 4 lines |
TOPIC | 954.0 | Slam-selct seq. sought |
| 954.2 | Thu Feb 06 1992 12:46 | Yes, if I saw both hands | 23 lines |
TOPIC | 957.0 | Mon Feb 10 1992 16:15 | Bridge and LKG | 11 lines |
TOPIC | 958.0 | Dealing With a Lead-Directing Question |
| 958.4 | Tue Feb 11 1992 18:05 | Interesting related story | 55 lines |
| 958.6 | Wed Feb 12 1992 14:45 | | 17 lines |
| 958.8 | Wed Feb 12 1992 15:16 | | 15 lines |
| 958.32 | Tue Feb 18 1992 14:59 | Some related points | 31 lines |
| 958.34 | Tue Feb 18 1992 15:27 | Touche | 15 lines |
| 958.46 | Tue Feb 25 1992 10:11 | | 41 lines |
TOPIC | 959.0 | Opening lead dilemma |
| 959.7 | Tue Feb 11 1992 18:12 | | 11 lines |
TOPIC | 960.0 | matchpoint bidding questions |
| 960.4 | Tue Feb 11 1992 18:19 | | 14 lines |
TOPIC | 961.0 | Do you run? |
| 961.3 | Wed Feb 12 1992 15:06 | | 27 lines |
TOPIC | 963.0 | What would you bid?
|
| 963.6 | Thu Feb 13 1992 13:15 | | 29 lines |
TOPIC | 966.0 | 3-way ethics |
| 966.7 | Tue Feb 18 1992 15:22 | Let us change the problem a bit | 30 lines |
TOPIC | 968.0 | Tue Feb 18 1992 16:04 | Hands from Cromwell | 101 lines |
TOPIC | 969.0 | Thu Feb 20 1992 12:51 | High level decisions (more from Cromwell) | 45 lines |
| 969.5 | Thu Feb 20 1992 15:46 | Oops | 8 lines |
| 969.14 | Fri Feb 21 1992 14:45 | Silence is golden, double is twice that | 55 lines |
TOPIC | 970.0 | A Defensive Dilemma |
| 970.5 | Thu Feb 27 1992 14:11 | Read the book, but carefully | 56 lines |
TOPIC | 978.0 | How many bites do I get at the apple ? |
| 978.1 | Tue Mar 03 1992 13:04 | | 24 lines |
| 978.5 | Thu Mar 12 1992 15:57 | Now that a director has spoken | 13 lines |
TOPIC | 984.0 | matchpoint bidding problem |
| 984.4 | Wed Mar 18 1992 13:41 | | 12 lines |
| 984.10 | Thu Mar 19 1992 14:12 | | 21 lines |
TOPIC | 985.0 | another matchpoint bidding problem |
| 985.4 | Wed Mar 18 1992 13:42 | 2N - what is the problem? | 0 lines |
TOPIC | 988.0 | Defense problem against 3NT |
| 988.3 | Tue Mar 24 1992 13:53 | DK | 36 lines |
| 988.8 | Tue Mar 31 1992 13:14 | You are most welcome | 0 lines |
| 988.9 | Thu Apr 02 1992 18:17 | From the other side of the table | 32 lines |
TOPIC | 992.0 | Luck + position are vital |
| 992.3 | Tue Mar 31 1992 13:33 | | 33 lines |
TOPIC | 996.0 | bad luck or bad play?? you be the judge |
| 996.7 | Thu Apr 09 1992 11:34 | | 8 lines |
TOPIC | 1048.0 | Mon Sep 14 1992 14:27 | IMP bidding problem | 16 lines |
| 1048.10 | Wed Sep 16 1992 12:55 | Before I give away the whole deal ... | 17 lines |
| 1048.18 | Sat Sep 19 1992 15:06 | | 64 lines |
TOPIC | 1099.0 | Defensive gem (updated, originally posted by Uresh) |
| 1099.4 | Tue Feb 09 1993 17:51 | Time for some hints | 21 lines |
| 1099.7 | Thu Feb 11 1993 10:48 | And the winner is ... | 74 lines |
| 1099.9 | Tue Feb 16 1993 10:03 | Nice analysis, Craig | 26 lines |
TOPIC | 1103.0 | would you have made this slam? |
| 1103.2 | Wed Feb 17 1993 15:17 | | 17 lines |