T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
387.1 | discount broker for me | SSGV01::GPEACE::Strobel | Psychotic Friends Network | Mon Dec 20 1993 13:25 | 6 |
| JC:
I go through a discount broker. I was going through a college friend
at Smith Barney, but with my limited portfolio and odd lot trades of stock,
the friendship was getting too costly.
jeff
|
387.2 | Q&R | BSS::MNELSON | Won't ya try just a little bit harder | Mon Dec 20 1993 16:17 | 9 |
|
Hey JC,
I use Quick and Reilly. They are a discount broker with quite
competitive rates, at least when I did my comparison about 3 years ago.
I'd check around anyway, teleshopping can save some $$. Q&R provides
me with little services as far as advising etc.., however Ive never
request any. i just need a broker for an occassional trade.
Mark
|
387.3 | | BIODTL::JC | Nothing like a good dose of the Dead | Tue Dec 21 1993 09:25 | 13 |
| I have 2 accounts. one with fidelity and one w/ waterhouse. fidelity is
nice 'cuz it has a touch-tone system: i can get quotes, execute trades,
set stop-loss orders, GTC orders, etc... all over the phone. and, if you
use the phone for your trade, you get 10% off...
however...
the commissions are not that competitive. that is why i opened an account
with waterhouse. most trades will cost $35- for what i do, where as with
fidelity, it'll cost $70!!! so, big savings, plus, waterhouse will send me
company S&P reports on demand, for free.... BUT, they don't have a 24-hr
system :-( ...
|
387.4 | | BIODTL::JC | Nothing like a good dose of the Dead | Tue Dec 21 1993 09:28 | 2 |
| BTW, what are you guys into these days?
|
387.5 | How long can the game go on.... | CARROL::YOUNG | where is this place in space??? | Tue Dec 21 1993 10:12 | 31 |
| i've been looking into this recently...seems Brown & Co. may be one of
the deepest discounters. You need $10,000 to open an account and all
trades must be settled at time of implementation (No 5 day lag, cash on
the barrel head, ie: in your account or available on margin)....
By using the 'time of trade rule' they save big $$$ in administrative
hassle which they pass on to you. Commissions are about $28/100 which
is about the lowest i've seen. i haven't set up an account with them
yet, but i'm considering them. i've looked a Fidelity and Schwab and
they are a lot more expensive....
This may be better in the 'bummer' note, but i've been reading Harry
Figgie's book 'Bankruptcy 1995'....in there he points out that based on
trends over the last 30 years and especially the last 6 years, by
1995-1997, the interest on the nation's debt will have exceeded the
revenues from individual and corporate income taxes and fees. Meaning
that the country will then be borrowing money just to pay the interest
on the debt, in effect bankrupt. In case you don't know what that means,
just imagine compounded interest in reverse...it will not be pretty.
With that in mind i'm jumping out of any type of bond exposure, be they
Government, Corporate or Municipal. In March i'll be moving my 401K
almost entirely out of the Equity and Guarenteed Income fund into the
Money Market fund. i'm also considering an extensive position in gold.
Now this may not make a lot of sense to some in here, but remember,
we have been forewarned, 1987 and especially 1929 can happen again.
And with that most famous of scouting mottos always on my mind,
Have fun and Be prepared,
Dugo....�
|
387.6 | | CSCMA::M_PECKAR | That would be something | Tue Dec 21 1993 10:35 | 4 |
|
> Now this may not make a lot of sense to some in here, but remember,
Makes perfect sense to me. That's why I invest in Beer. :-)
|
387.7 | Pizza | BSS::MNELSON | Won't ya try just a little bit harder | Tue Dec 21 1993 10:44 | 15 |
|
In the past I liked to play options. It is a crap shoot at its finest.
You can track a given stock on a daily basis and watch your money grow
or disappear. I got burned the last few times on DEC calls. Most
recently I adopted a more conservative investment strategy involving
mutual funds. I was getting the Mutual Fund Forecaster and they rate
funds with projected returns and risk level. My most recent investment
was in a Pizza place. Decent return, equity bonus, and free pizza to
boot :^).
Mark
|
387.8 | | BIODTL::JC | Nothing like a good dose of the Dead | Tue Dec 21 1993 13:17 | 30 |
| re: young
i notice you've been asking a lot of ?s about gold in investing!
----
I'm currently looking into Datron Systems (NASDAQ:DTSI), Forest Oil
(NASDAQ:FOIL), Pheonix Tech (NASDAQ:PTEC), and a few others.... i'd
dump my dec stock today but i'd face the dreaded wash rule if i didn't
sell all of them (which is what i don't want to do). dec stock is
my worst asset right now... a guy in the investing notes file
"predicts" that dec will top around 2/14/94, so, i plan to sell around
that time and roll it over into "better" opportunities....
I do the mutual fund thang - have about 6 diff. funds with various
amount of $$ in them. i have lots in tax-free bonds - some of which
i plan to sell after NYE to avoid a more gains for '93. the TF bond
funds have done very good by me over the last 2 1/2 yrs i've had 'em.
consistenly returning >5.5% FED & STATE tax free along with a bit of
share-price appeciation. overall, when i sell, i'll probably get anywhere
from 12% - 18% ... (i will have to pay cap.gains on share price gains).
however, i think the Fed is nearly ready to nudge int. rates up, which would
kill my bonds.... so, time to sell. bonds are _great_ to get into if
the int. rates are going down, which they have over the last 2 1/2 yrs.
i'm also in fid. low-priced stock fund, fid. stock selector, scudder
g&i, etc.... currently about 25% in bonds, 48% stock, 27% cash,,,
i want to get into a good international fund - that is about the only
area where i have 0 investment.
|
387.9 | Goin' for the gold... | CARROL::YOUNG | where is this place in space??? | Tue Dec 21 1993 15:45 | 18 |
| Hey JC...yep, just trying to figure out what that market is all about.
After all of my discussions it seems that Current US Gold Eagles may be
the best bet. Some say those and Canadian Maple Leaves, but if the sh*t
does hit the fan then US Gold Coinage will be more liquid than foreign
gold....
Some have directed me towards $20 St. Guadens Gold pieces (Cica 1920's)
but this is a very speculative market because now you have the
intrinsic value of the coin involved. It maybe a good short term move
as interest rates/gold prices escalate, these will go up at a 50%
greater rate than the gold spot.
Anyway, i'm making my move to US Eagles for long term holding and a
couple St. Guadens for short term speculation.
Later,
Doug
|
387.10 | | AKOCOA::SMITH_D | twenty four and there's so much more | Wed Jan 05 1994 14:53 | 12 |
|
Yeeeeee Haaaawwww
There is some real serious shit going on on the stock
scene. Up to 37 1/8 in a matter of hours!
I already put in to sell at 12:01, couldn't have worked
out better!!!!!
Nothing left to do but sell, sell, sell! :-) :-) :-)
|
387.11 | my taxes are simple no more... | ROCK::FROMM | It's hard to care about a don't care. | Wed Jan 05 1994 15:22 | 8 |
| Hey Now>quote
DEC 37 1/8, change +2 3/8; DJIA 3781.93, change -1.97 at 14:40.
Report entered at Wed Jan 5 14:40:49 1994.
i promised myself that when it got above the 1-dec purchase price i'd sell
i did
- rich
|
387.12 | | TERAPN::PHYLLIS | in the shadow of the moon | Wed Jan 05 1994 15:33 | 5 |
|
could be reaction to the imminent layoffs in Europe. (around 6000
folks I think :-/)
|
387.13 | | MKOTS3::JOLLIMORE | Tis the Season to be Jolli | Wed Jan 05 1994 15:41 | 2 |
| "Brokerage system not available."
"Please, call back later."
|
387.14 | | AKOCOA::SMITH_D | twenty four and there's so much more | Wed Jan 05 1994 15:40 | 7 |
|
Would that effect the stock positively?
Perhaps it has a little to do with the new "agressive marketing
campaign" that is going to be occuring. I guess ads ran today
in the W.S.J., N.Y.T., and other high volume papers, not to mention
some television propo.
|
387.15 | Welcome to the '90's... | BINKLY::CEPARSKI | From the Dark End of the Street | Wed Jan 05 1994 15:53 | 10 |
|
>>not to mention some television propo.
Yeah, i saw 2 commercials on A&E last nite - nearly fell outta my chair
when I saw 'em. They were pretty lame IMO especially compared to some
of the visually exciting stuff that goes on in commercials these days.
These were the "new" logo on a black background with some elevator
muzak playing in the background while some guy jibbered on about
something. As you can tell they really made a lasting impression ;^)
|
387.16 | | TERAPN::PHYLLIS | in the shadow of the moon | Wed Jan 05 1994 15:57 | 9 |
|
> Would that effect the stock positively?
yes.
What would make me fall outta my chair would be if Digital actually had
a *good* marketing ad.. campaign.. commercial.. whatever.
|
387.17 | | BIODTL::JC | Nothing like a good dose of the Dead | Thu Jan 06 1994 10:30 | 22 |
| re <<< Note 387.11 by ROCK::FROMM "It's hard to care about a don't care." >>>
> -< my taxes are simple no more... >-
Actually rich, it is quite easy. gotta get yerself familiar w/ good old sched
D... you don't have to worry about it though for a loooooong time.
>i promised myself that when it got above the 1-dec purchase price i'd sell
>i did
good man.. good investing practice is to stick to your goals. i'm learning
more about doing this... i bought novell at 19 1/2 and planned to sell it
when it went to 23 1/2 for a short-term gain. i saw it go up to 25 1/4,
knew results were due out, and decided to wait. i was too busy to read about
the company in the press, and later, the stock plunged back to 20 or so...
if i stuck to my orig goals, i would have been ahead $800, but alas, i'll
be waiting (actually, yesturday it closed at 22 1/8 or so... ). hell, if
i sold at 25 1/4, i would have been up over 1k, ain't 20-20 hindsight nice
to have?????
|
387.18 | | TERAPN::PHYLLIS | in the shadow of the moon | Thu Jan 06 1994 10:32 | 7 |
|
fwiw - the Wall Street Journal apparently did have an article yesterday
with positive comments about the european "reorg"
right now, DEC stock is at 37 3/8.
|
387.19 | color me cynical | GOOROO::DCLARK | I AM IRON MAN | Thu Jan 06 1994 10:33 | 1 |
| I've seen the stock do this too many times to get excited.
|
387.20 | I got a sell in for today too | BSS::MNELSON | Won't ya try just a little bit harder | Thu Jan 06 1994 10:41 | 4 |
| I put in a sell order before noon yesterday also. Come on DEC stock!
Mark
|
387.21 | | ROCK::FROMM | It's hard to care about a don't care. | Thu Jan 06 1994 11:02 | 9 |
| i'm a little confused; if i put in a sell order yesterday before the deadline
(noon thru vtx, 3 pm thru voice-mail), when does the sell occur? i called the
voice-mail number this morning; the menu option that lists how many shares i
have has the number that i would expect had the sale gone thru, but another
menu option tells me that i haven't sold any shares within the last month; so,
has my sale happened yet? do i just have to wait a day or so for the voice-
mail system to catch up with it?
- rich
|
387.22 | | TERAPN::PHYLLIS | in the shadow of the moon | Thu Jan 06 1994 11:07 | 8 |
|
>i'm a little confused; if i put in a sell order yesterday before the
>deadline (noon thru vtx, 3 pm thru voice-mail), when does the sell
>occur?
today
|
387.23 | ? | ROCK::FROMM | It's hard to care about a don't care. | Thu Jan 06 1994 11:13 | 5 |
| > today
at the opening or closing? or sometime in-between?
- rich
|
387.24 | | TERAPN::PHYLLIS | in the shadow of the moon | Thu Jan 06 1994 11:38 | 5 |
|
I don't know. Call 223-6000 and push the numbers to get a person.
I think it's #2 and then #6 but I'm not positive.
|
387.25 | | GRANPA::TDAVIS | | Thu Jan 06 1994 22:19 | 1 |
| Once again, I sold on Tuesday ah.................
|
387.26 | | AKOCOA::SMITH_D | twenty four n' there's so much more | Fri Jan 07 1994 09:38 | 8 |
|
Argh!!!!! My sell got rejected cause I &%$#'ed up.....
Now I have to wait for over a week....it'll probably be
back down by then....
&%$#@*&% !$#%@^& ^&@%^%^&%#%& %&#% &$@$^
|
387.27 | | MKOTS3::JOLLIMORE | Wave upon the sand | Fri Jan 07 1994 10:44 | 5 |
| recent sale prices:
Tue 34.579
Wed 35.518
Thu 37.084 (closed at 36.750)
Fri ??.??? (36.875 @10:00)
|
387.28 | | BIODTL::JC | Just one thing I ask of you | Tue Jan 18 1994 15:33 | 2 |
| Well, I just acquired some shares of Designs Inc. So, when ya'll need to
buy Levi's, buy 'em at Designs, ok? :-)
|
387.29 | Should I call Deane Whitter? | AKOCOA::SMITH_D | twenty four n' there's so much more | Tue Jan 18 1994 23:10 | 3 |
|
JC? Is this a tip mon? ;-)
|
387.30 | | BIODTL::JC | Just one thing I ask of you | Wed Jan 19 1994 10:23 | 6 |
| No tips mon. I just looked into the company and decided it was a good
investment, that is all. in today's 1.8% interest-at-the-bank, you gotta
find other vehicles 'cuz $1000.00 today won't be worth $1000.00 next year.
my goal this year is 15% return on investments.
risky? you bet. but, if ya don't play, you don't get paid.
|
387.31 | | SSGV01::TPNSTN::Strobel | Jetson, you're TFSO'd !!! | Wed Jan 19 1994 12:34 | 1 |
| for those still holding, Digital stocks down ~10% this morning to 32 5/8 off 3 7/8.......
|
387.32 | | E::EVANS | | Wed Jan 19 1994 16:12 | 7 |
|
I heard they stopped trading in DEC stock for a while after the quarterly
results can out. $32 and change is not any vote of confidence from Wall
Street.
Jim
|
387.33 | | TERAPN::PHYLLIS | in the shadow of the moon | Wed Jan 19 1994 16:18 | 5 |
|
I think you gotta be crazy to play the DECstock game anymore. You take
your 15% (or close to it) every 6 months and run.
|
387.34 | | BIODTL::JC | Just one thing I ask of you | Thu Jan 20 1994 12:01 | 9 |
| re <<< Note 387.33 by TERAPN::PHYLLIS "in the shadow of the moon" >>>
> I think you gotta be crazy to play the DECstock game anymore. You take
> your 15% (or close to it) every 6 months and run.
i concur with this advise and plan to do so on June 1. if i had done it
from the start, i wouldn't be $3k or whatever in the negative!!!!!!
|
387.35 | | TERAPN::PHYLLIS | in the shadow of the moon | Thu Jan 20 1994 12:04 | 5 |
|
in my mind, it's been the only way for a while. I haven't held on to
DECstock in years.
|
387.36 | down, down, down, down... | ROCK::FROMM | It's hard to care about a don't care. | Tue Feb 01 1994 10:48 | 8 |
| we're below 30:
DEC 29 7/8, change -0 3/8; DJIA 3965.13, change -13.23 at 10:35.
Report entered at Tue Feb 1 10:38:49 1994.
when's the last time that happened? more than a decade ago?
- rich
|
387.37 | | GNPIKE::HANNAN | Beyond description... | Tue Feb 01 1994 11:09 | 7 |
| > we're below 30:
> when's the last time that happened? more than a decade ago?
I thought I heard the recent $30 and fraction was the lowest ever, and
if so, the record may be broken today...
/Ken
|
387.38 | where next? | SANDZ::SAMPSON | Driven by the wind | Tue Feb 01 1994 17:46 | 4 |
| A decade ago we were really hot, moving in on $200 and ready to split.
I thought I was working for a stable company then. But I was sick of
that group and job and hoping to find something better. It took a
while, but I liked where I landed.
|
387.39 | | BIODTL::JC | cuz everybody's gotta go | Wed Feb 02 1994 09:57 | 10 |
| I think digital stock will see 25-27 before it sees 35 again. We
still have a tremendous management problem, IMO. until we can get that
straightened out and moral back on track, i don't think our stock is
going anywhere but d
o
w
n
bear_on_DEC_JC
|
387.40 | Watch your money... | CARROL::YOUNG | where is this place in space??? | Fri Feb 04 1994 17:01 | 4 |
| Dow down 96.2 on news that the FED boosted short term rates by a
1/4%...
The correction has begun...
|
387.41 | | BIODTL::JC | cuz everybody's gotta go | Fri Feb 04 1994 18:11 | 9 |
| I don't think this is going to be a lasting correction because everything
else is indicating a strong economy. Yeah, i think monday and tues will
continue to be down days, but, i think it'll come back up by the end of
next week....
who really knows.
96 pts is a hefty drop.
|
387.42 | Don't panic -- ya right! :-) | SUBPAC::MAGGARD | Ya don't hafta spell'em ta eat'em! | Mon Feb 07 1994 11:12 | 11 |
|
re: DOW down 100
<random stock market analyst> on NPR said the 100pt. drop was due to a number
of things, including the 'surprise nudge' in short term F.R. interest rates...
...he said there's nothing to worry about...
Makes ya wonder :-)
- jeff
|
387.43 | | BIODTL::JC | cuz everybody's gotta go | Mon Feb 07 1994 13:56 | 7 |
| >re: DOW down 100
it is up 24 already today, that is, if the quote is right from the quote
program.
the market still _wants_ to hit 4k!
|
387.44 | | BIODTL::JC | cuz everybody's gotta go | Fri Feb 18 1994 15:39 | 7 |
| hey mr. strobel...
novl has been on the ups lately. just checked it and it is
24 1/4... up 1 3/8 today (up yesturday 1 3/8 also).
i like it.
|
387.45 | | ANGLIN::GEBHART | Met her accidentally in St.Paul, MN | Fri Feb 18 1994 15:42 | 5 |
| RE: stock
saw Digital down to 28 1/4 today.
|
387.46 | | SSGV01::TPNSTN::Strobel | Jetson, you're TFSO'd !!! | Mon Feb 21 1994 15:04 | 14 |
| re: -.2
see JC, I told ya ;-) Of course, if I'd cashed my $2k investment in Novell
last spring and bought Lotus with it, I'd have $7k today!!
Nice to see Novell rallying. I guess the person with the "latest" inside
track to replace Ray Noorda is someone from HP who's both popular with the
industry and Wall St. I still think Lotus will make another play for them.
Such a move would give Lotus 2 Operating Systems (Unix and DR-DOS) Netware
and a user interface in Notes. Nice way to squeeze the 'Evil Empire' in
Redmond.
jeff
|
387.47 | | BIODTL::JC | cuz everybody's gotta go | Tue Feb 22 1994 09:09 | 2 |
| Let's see if the rally continues into this week... here's to hoping 'cuz i
gotta pay for a colorado trip!
|
387.48 | | AKOCOA::SMITH_D | simple twist of fate | Tue May 03 1994 13:02 | 9 |
|
To answer a previously asked question....
From VTX
The current Employee Stock Purchase Program is scheduled to
be terminated on 12/31/95.
|
387.49 | where? | ROCK::FROMM | This space intentionally left blank. | Tue May 03 1994 14:16 | 8 |
| > From VTX
>
> The current Employee Stock Purchase Program is scheduled to
> be terminated on 12/31/95.
specifically where in vtx is this information located?
- rich
|
387.50 | | AKOCOA::SMITH_D | simple twist of fate | Tue May 03 1994 14:52 | 6 |
|
I just went through and read it again. I believe the part
I read was under the "Equity Plan" section (stock options), item
12. So this may not be true of the regular Employee Stock Purchase
Plan. I do find it interesting that the current stock option
plan will expire though.
|
387.51 | item 12 under what? | ROCK::FROMM | This space intentionally left blank. | Tue May 03 1994 15:04 | 7 |
| > I just went through and read it again. I believe the part
> I read was under the "Equity Plan" section (stock options), item
> 12.
again, i can not find this. please point me to precisely where you read it.
- rich
|
387.52 | | AKOCOA::SMITH_D | simple twist of fate | Tue May 03 1994 15:09 | 8 |
|
VTX IS
Item # 4 (Prospectus)
Item #12 (General Information)
It's one of the first few screens there.
|
387.53 | wrong one? | SUBPAC::MAGGARD | Integrate! | Tue May 03 1994 16:41 | 7 |
|
Deano, selection 12 is for the EP (stock options), not the ESPP. Selections
1-3 are for the ESPP. As of this morning, the information listed for the ESPP
is dated 12-OCT-1990, and does not contain any mention w/r/t termination of
the plan.
- jeff
|
387.54 | Hummmmmm | AKOCOA::SMITH_D | simple twist of fate | Thu May 19 1994 12:50 | 7 |
|
So with all these employees selling out on the purchase date, what
do people feel the results of that will be on Wall Street???
In other words, what are the chancess of the stock falling so
rapidly on Jun 1 that despite the 15% discount we end up breaking
even/losing out?
|
387.55 | Are you a gamblin' man? | SUBPAC::MAGGARD | Integrate! | Thu May 19 1994 18:55 | 5 |
| re: .54
Anything is possible. :-)
|
387.56 | | BIODTL::JC | Gimmie a shorty! | Thu May 19 1994 23:20 | 9 |
| well, it is hard to say deano.
right now, we're at 23.00. 15% of 23 is 3.45. if we buy at 15% of
23 and dec drops 3.45, it is break even...
a 3.45 move down is possible, as we have seen.
if you think that possibility exists, hold.
but once you hold, you're speculating.
|
387.57 | SELL!!! | ROCK::FROMM | This space intentionally left blank. | Tue May 31 1994 12:11 | 8 |
| just a reminder that today is the deadline to put in your sell order for the
1-jun purchase, if you are so inclined
vtx deadline is noon. i think you might be able to go until 3:00 pm by phone.
question, do i just leave the purchase price spot on the form blank?
- rich
|
387.58 | | MKOTS3::ROBERTS_CR | the evening sky grew dark | Tue May 31 1994 12:35 | 5 |
|
yes - leave the purchase $ blank ... they make the connection and
ok it when they see the sell date
|
387.59 | | MKOTS3::ROBERTS_CR | the evening sky grew dark | Tue May 31 1994 12:36 | 5 |
|
and you get a nifty return mail msg verifying your request to purchase.
aaaaaaahhhhh - the magic of computers
|
387.60 | vtx is? or a dtn, maybe? | MKOTS3::ROBERTS_CR | the evening sky grew dark | Mon Jun 06 1994 13:51 | 4 |
| ok now - how do i find out how many (Digital) shares I actually have left
if I chose not to 'sell all' ?
carol
|
387.61 | Er...Instructions | BINKLY::CEPARSKI | Show Me Something Built To Last | Mon Jun 06 1994 13:53 | 2 |
| carol -
call DTN 223-6000 and follow the destructions.
|
387.62 | | BIODTL::JC | positive vibration | Mon Jun 06 1994 14:33 | 9 |
| carol:
223-6000
1#
badge#
secret code#
3#
|
387.64 | hypothetically speaking of course | WESERV::ROBERTS | climb a ladder to the stars | Mon Nov 28 1994 15:53 | 10 |
|
ok - let's go round again. I have the twice annual question about
employee purchase of stock. In round numbers, if I have $100 in my
stock fund or whatever you call it and the stock sells on 12/1 for $30,
I will get the emp discount and purchase for 15% under that (?) so that
would be around $25 each so I would have 4 shares for $100, yes?
And then it gets sold for $30 each and I get $120, yes?
c
|
387.65 | $$$ | ROCK::FROMM | This space intentionally left blank. | Mon Nov 28 1994 16:10 | 22 |
| <<< Note 97.5392 by WESERV::ROBERTS "climb a ladder to the stars" >>>
> In round numbers, if I have $100 in my
> stock fund or whatever you call it and the stock sells on 12/1 for $30,
> I will get the emp discount and purchase for 15% under that (?)
no, you purchase for 85% of the fair market value (a term that we have
debated in the past - don't worry too much about those details) of whatever
was lower - the first day of the buy period, or the last day. in this case,
the stock has risen significantly, so we get to purchase at 85% of what it was
6 months ago. i think we'll be buying at around 18 1/2. since the stock is
now trading in the mid-30's (but slowly slipping), we'll be almost doubling
our money (a 100% return) for what is essentially a 3 month investment (since
some of your money has been on hold for 6 months, but some has only been on
hold a week, so the average is 3 months). not a bad rate of return.
> And then it gets sold for $30 each and I get $120, yes?
don't forget that there is some minimal commission. but it's pretty small
when dealing with the ESPP (compared to a broker, that is)
- rich
|
387.66 | | WESERV::ROBERTS | climb a ladder to the stars | Mon Nov 28 1994 16:55 | 6 |
|
I love this place
thanks Rich!
c
|
387.67 | | BIODTL::JC | don't criticize it | Tue Nov 29 1994 09:06 | 34 |
| re <<< Note 97.5393 by ROCK::FROMM "This space intentionally left blank." >>>
-< $$$ >-
>6 months ago. i think we'll be buying at around 18 1/2. since the stock is
>now trading in the mid-30's (but slowly slipping), we'll be almost doubling
i think it is actually 18 1/4!
>our money (a 100% return) for what is essentially a 3 month investment (since
>some of your money has been on hold for 6 months, but some has only been on
>hold a week, so the average is 3 months). not a bad rate of return.
it is actually better than that, because the money you put in last week
get the same rate of return as the money you put in last july. so, on
one week's money, you're getting nearly 100% return, annualize that and
it becomes very large!
>don't forget that there is some minimal commission. but it's pretty small
>when dealing with the ESPP (compared to a broker, that is)
this isn't true at all. i can sell 100 shares of DEC thru my disc. broker
for less than with investor services. all of my dec stock is w/ my disc.
broker. however, now, i buy/sell the same day /cuz my portfolio is too
loaded w/ DEC.
BTW... this is the period i've been waiting for since i joined dec in '87.
in the summer of '87, DEC was near $199 a share... then, it fell from there.
the bottom happened in the last purchase period. so, we're looking at
70-90% return... you put in 1000, you get back 1700. not bad. if i could
do 50% of my pay, i would.
|
387.68 | | LTSLAB::IDE | My mind's lost in a household fog. | Tue Nov 29 1994 09:33 | 8 |
| Here's some more free advice for you stock mavens. I strongly advise
waiting until after the new year to sell stock because the Republicans
will probably lower the capital gains tax next year. Also, I think Q2
results will get a good reaction and I plan to hang on until after
they're announced. If I can, money is very tight right now as we're
OIOKs (one income, one kid).
Jamie
|
387.69 | is anyone holding for second quarter results? | ALFA2::DWEST | but i play one on tv... | Tue Nov 29 1994 09:41 | 14 |
| re Jamie's reply...
i was thinking of putting in something like that myself... they are
supposed to drop capital gains (which doesn't really help unless you've
held the shares for a year i believe... hsort term cap gains are like
ordinary income i think) and that might save some money, but if the
second quarter numbers look good, then the stock should jump up
again...
i'd like to wait but i'm not sure i can afford to... :^( i could use
that money yesterday, and the part of me that lost on the slot machines
in Vegas is screaming "take the money and run!!" :^)
da ve
|
387.70 | it's all a big gamble | ROCK::FROMM | This space intentionally left blank. | Tue Nov 29 1994 09:46 | 17 |
| > <<< Note 97.5402 by ALFA2::DWEST "but i play one on tv..." >>>
> -< is anyone holding for second quarter results? >-
i'm not so sure whether or not that's a good idea. the stock performance
doesn't necessarily have anything to do with how well we're doing, only how
well we're doing relative to how well people think we ought to be doing. which
is why we can lose $100 million in a quarter and have the stock soar, because
people thought we were going to lose a lot more.
so now everyone thinks that we're turning around, and that this next quarter
is going to be good. so what happens if it's not as rosy as people expect?
i'm worried that that could send the stock down again, and the analysts who
are now saying "buy" will return to saying "sell"
i may hedge my bets by selling half immediately and holding on to half.
- rich
|
387.71 | | BIODTL::JC | don't criticize it | Tue Nov 29 1994 12:04 | 34 |
| i think people are mistaken here.
if you buy/sell on DEC1, it is unlikely that you'll have any cap. gain
unless the stock goes up on the selling day. the key is where the money
goes. we buy for 18 1/4, and sell for 33 or so. the difference is added
to your PAY, and it is not a capital gain. it is ordinary income. you'll
only get a cap gain if the price rises ABOVE the nov-30 closing price.
so, say you wait.
30-Nov DEC is 33
Jan 1 comes around and DEC is at 40.
you sell.
cap gain = (40-33) 7/share
then, you get 33-18 1/4 * #shares sold added to your W2.
i quite certain that this is the way it works.
NOTE: if you decide to hold, you've drastically changed the objective
of the ESPP from a 'guarenteed' investment to one of high speculation.
kinda like taking $1000 from the bank and buying XYZ stock. as with any
speculation, it can go sour or it can grow.... just make sure you
understand this and make sure it matches your original goals when you
joined ESPP.
Also, watch the # of DEC shares you have.
if you have 200 DEC and $5000 in savings, you have more than
50% of your savings/investments in ONE vehicle!! and, to
add more to this, you also work for DEC. can you say
single point of failure?? just becareful, spread the risk
around... if you have too much DEC, sell this round and
_immediately_ roll it into a mutual fund or something else....
FWIW.
|
387.72 | | LASSIE::TRAMP::GRADY | Stop The Violins. | Tue Nov 29 1994 12:34 | 24 |
| In the past, long term capital gains were taxed at a lower rate than
ordinary income. This type of tax encouraged long-term investment,
and there has been talk of reinstating such a tax - particularly by
the Republicans, who naturally have the most to gain from it. "Long
term" usually meant you had to hold onto the asset for a year or longer
before selling it if you wanted to qualify for the tax break. Holding
stocks until January that you purchased in December is not likely to
do you any good unless you anticipate a lower tax burden in 1995 than
you will have for 1994 - lower income, lower tax rate, more deductions
or whatever. You definitely will not benefit from any change in the
capital gains tax rate.
In addition, keep in mind that it's just as likely that the stock will
go from 35 to 40 as it is for it to go from 35 to 30 by January 1 -
whether due to less-than-anticipated second quarter results (remember,
the market is expecting us to make a profit for the first time in what,
a year? two?), or simply due to a post-holiday correction, which isn't
that rare either. If you buy 100 shares and the stock drops 5 bucks,
well you can do the math...:-(
Frankly, unless you plan to hold the stock long term, it just doesn't
seem worth the risk. Bears win, and bulls win, but pigs get burned.
tim
|
387.73 | you LOSE if you SELL! | SUBPAC::MAGGARD | Integrate! | Tue Nov 29 1994 12:42 | 20 |
| > i think people are mistaken here.
yup.
> if you buy/sell on DEC1, it is unlikely that you'll have any cap. gain
> unless the stock goes up on the selling day. the key is where the money goes.
> we buy for 18 1/4, and sell for 33 or so. the difference is added to your
> PAY, and it is not a capital gain. it is ordinary income.
!!!! *AND YOU PAY ***INCOME TAX*** on that big gain* !!!!!
Income tax is over 40% (28% federal, 6% state, 8% FICA, etc., etc.) for most
folks. Capital gains tax in "only" 18% now.
Conclusion: You get the Purple Shaft With The Mustard Cluster if you sell
WITHIN 2 YEARS of the PURCHASE date. You get to forego the Mustard Cluster if
you wait 2 years before selling.
- jeff
|
387.74 | | DELNI::DSMITH | Snowless mogulfield blues | Tue Nov 29 1994 12:52 | 5 |
|
Or, if you don't see your investment turning around....sell at a very
slight loss and cry/claim at tax time.
I ended up getting back what I lost and then some. Rage! :-)
|
387.75 | | BIODTL::JC | don't criticize it | Tue Nov 29 1994 13:57 | 19 |
| re <<< Note 97.5406 by SUBPAC::MAGGARD "Integrate!" >>>
-< you LOSE if you SELL! >-
>!!!! *AND YOU PAY ***INCOME TAX*** on that big gain* !!!!!
>
>Income tax is over 40% (28% federal, 6% state, 8% FICA, etc., etc.) for most
>folks. Capital gains tax in "only" 18% now.
the bottom line isn't anywhere near 40% by the time you compute deductions,
etc,etc. my tax rate ended up being 18.8% or so last year when i compare
the tax i hadda pay vs. the income i had.
>Conclusion: You get the Purple Shaft With The Mustard Cluster if you sell
>WITHIN 2 YEARS of the PURCHASE date. You get to forego the Mustard Cluster if
>you wait 2 years before selling.
this is correct, 'cuz after 2 yrs, DEC doesn't bother tacking on the
purported income from the stock buy/sell.
|
387.76 | Why Investor Services | POWDML::CUTLER | | Tue Nov 29 1994 15:39 | 9 |
| re: .5408
DEC keeps track of who sells theie ESPP stock within two years (through
Investor Services only) because DEC gets a tax deduction on these
shares (Not that the company needs any more tax deductions, but that is
the reason Investor Services makes it easy for you as an employeee to
sell your ESPP shares through the compnay)
Jack
|
387.77 | jcf: Personal DEChead Invester Services | PONDA::QUOIN::BELKIN | one...3...5...7..8..9.10! | Tue Nov 29 1994 15:49 | 4 |
| Stock - I'm sooo confused! I know I gotta do something, I just dunno
what. I got a lot of shares, a lot from way back when it was around $50-$80.
Josh
|
387.78 | | BIODTL::JC | don't criticize it | Wed Nov 30 1994 08:52 | 14 |
| re <<< Note 97.5410 by POWDML::CUTLER >>>
-< Why Investor Services >-
> re: .5408
>
> DEC keeps track of who sells theie ESPP stock within two years (through
> Investor Services only) because DEC gets a tax deduction on these
> shares (Not that the company needs any more tax deductions, but that is
> the reason Investor Services makes it easy for you as an employeee to
> sell your ESPP shares through the compnay)
yup, i just got a mailing from IS asking me if i sold any of the shares
that i had xfr'd to my disc. broker...
|
387.79 | mebbe we need a dechead investing topic? "^) | ALFA1::DWEST | but i play one on tv... | Wed Nov 30 1994 09:26 | 17 |
| has anyone created a stock note in here yet? :^)
now i'm confused... i know money gets added to your w2 pay stuff
due to the stock plan, but i didn't think that was your profits from
sales of stock... thought that was the "discount" that was considered
"taxable compensation" from the company... ie, you buy a 100 stock
for 85 bux and the $15 is added to your w2... if you sell for 110
then the 10 is what you report as a gain on schedule d... if i
understand the earlier descriptions correctly, it sounds like in my
example the 15 discount AND the 10 gain (all your profits) would be
on your w2... this doesn't sound right to me, but i could be mistaken
or just misunderstand...
this is sure getting confusing... JC, i may just have to take you up
on that offer of financial advice! :^) :^) :^)
da ve
|
387.80 | | LTSLAB::IDE | My mind's lost in a household fog. | Wed Nov 30 1994 09:38 | 5 |
| re .-1
You've got it right. I was confused earlier.
Jamie
|
387.63 | stock | ROCK::FROMM | This space intentionally left blank. | Wed Nov 30 1994 10:30 | 30 |
| we really ought to have a stock note, shouldn't we?
anyway, just a reminder that the deadline to put in a sale for tomorrow is
fast approaching. some FAQ from VTX:
Q: What is the cut-off for selling?
A: The cut-off is 12:00 noon Eastern Time. VTX IS sell requests are
time-stamped when you fill in information and use FORM ENTER.
Q: Will I get an electronic confirmation?
A: Yes, within a few hours of placing your sell request via VTX IS, you
will receive via E-mail a confirmation from Investor Services that
your sale order was received for processing.
Q: Can I obtain my account balances through VTX IS?
A: Presently, no. Possibly in the future.
Q: How do I sell for December 1st, 1994?
A: Access the Sell Form, fill in ALL for # Shares to Sell, 01-Dec-1994
for the Purchase Date, and E for the Plan Type. (Valid pre-selling
dates for December 1st are Nov 1 - Nov 30th, 12:00 noon Eastern US
Time.)
- rich
p.s. i think the cutoff is 3 PM if you do it over the phone
|
387.81 | | BIODTL::JC | don't criticize it | Thu Dec 01 1994 09:39 | 42 |
| re <<< Note 387.79 by ALFA1::DWEST "but i play one on tv..." >>>
-< mebbe we need a dechead investing topic? "^) >-
it was in the true Grateful spirit of digressions! :-)
> now i'm confused... i know money gets added to your w2 pay stuff
> due to the stock plan, but i didn't think that was your profits from
> sales of stock... thought that was the "discount" that was considered
> "taxable compensation" from the company... ie, you buy a 100 stock
> for 85 bux and the $15 is added to your w2... if you sell for 110
> then the 10 is what you report as a gain on schedule d...
yup, this is right. $100 is considered your "cost basis". typically, in
a buy/sell on the same day scenario, you usually have a loss! that's because
DEC tends to drop on the buy dates... i'm predicting a $2-3 drop today, close
around 31 or so. so, yesturday we closed at 33 7/8. i reckon this will
be our cost basis for this purchase, but, DEC will get us the avg price
for the day, which will be maybe $32 or so. so, you really will have a cap.
loss, very slight however (33 7/8 - 32.00)
> if i
> understand the earlier descriptions correctly, it sounds like in my
> example the 15 discount AND the 10 gain (all your profits) would be
> on your w2... this doesn't sound right to me, but i could be mistaken
> or just misunderstand...
just the $15 is W2 reported, the 10 goes to sched. D.
BTW, if you have other DEC stock, be sure NOT TO SELL 30 before/after
the buy date 'cuz you'll get the pipe w/ the IRS wash rule. there are
some ways you can trade in this window, but, it is complicated and
subject to intepretation...
> this is sure getting confusing... JC, i may just have to take you up
> on that offer of financial advice! :^) :^) :^)
c'mon over!!! we'll have a coupla brews, talk money, then
check out the commidity Oats market and see how that's
doing :-)
|
387.82 | | BIODTL::JC | don't criticize it | Thu Dec 01 1994 16:13 | 3 |
| Looks like we closed at 32, off -2.
predictable.
|
387.83 | we bought @ 18 1/4, fwiw | ROCK::FROMM | This space intentionally left blank. | Mon Dec 05 1994 11:30 | 29 |
| <><><><><><><><> T h e V O G O N N e w s S e r v i c e <><><><><><><><>
Edition : 3207 Monday 5-Dec-1994 Circulation : 5264
VNS MAIN NEWS ..................................... 69 Lines
VNS COMPUTER NEWS ................................. 125 "
VNS TECHNOLOGY WATCH .............................. 19 "
For information on how to subscribe to VNS, ordering backissues, contacting
VNS staff members, etc, send a mail to EXPAT::EXPAT with a subject of HELP.
VNS COMPUTER NEWS: [Tracy Talcott, VNS Computer Desk]
================== [Nashua, NH, USA ]
Fair Market Value
1-Jun-1994 $21.375
30-Nov-1994 $34.437
85% of lower $18.25
1-Dec-1994 $32.375
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
For information on how to subscribe to VNS, ordering backissues, contacting
VNS staff members, etc, send a mail to EXPAT::EXPAT with a subject of HELP.
Permission to copy material from this VNS is granted (per DIGITAL PP&P)
provided that the message header for the issue and credit lines for the
VNS correspondent and original source are retained in the copy.
<><><><><><><><> VNS Edition : 3207 Monday 5-Dec-1994 <><><><><><><><>
|
387.84 | | BIODTL::JC | don't criticize it | Thu Dec 08 1994 20:28 | 7 |
| Got the payment... nice 78% return or so.
BTW folks, DEC 15 is the cutoff for joining SAVE aka 401k.
if you can afford it, do it... great hedge on taxes.
|
387.85 | more onthis in DIGITAL notes (sorry, can't remember where) | ALFA2::DWEST | but i play one on tv... | Fri Dec 09 1994 09:11 | 7 |
| regarding the SAVE program, there's a discussion going on in DIGITAL
notes right now about the various fund choices that are available
these days... apparently there are folks out there that are
considerably less than pleased about the recent changes to the plan...
check it out and know where your money's going...
da ve
|
387.86 | | ASDG::IDE | My mind's lost in a household fog. | Fri Feb 10 1995 08:26 | 17 |
| Schedule D is a nightmare for me this year. We've got a small number of Kodak
shares that were given to my wife 25 years ago. The dividends have always been
re-invested and the stock has split at least twice (2-1 & 3-2) since then. Last
year Kodak spun off Eastman Chemical and we acquired an even smaller number of
shares of this stock. Eastman Chem. then offered to sell the shares for a small
fee and we took advantage of it. So, now I need to figure out the cost basis,
which is going to be 20% of the basis of the original Kodak shares. Ugggh.
This is all going to amount to probably about $20 of capital gain for hours of
my effort deciphering IRS rules.
Worse yet, we just got a statement from Eastman Chemical saying that we still
have a balance of $0.02. I'm leaving that one for the executor of my estate.
:-)
The complexity of the tax codes really discourage me from doing much investing.
Jamie
|
387.87 | 2 lousy stinkin' cents? | QUOIN::BELKIN | one...3...5...7..8..9.10! | Fri Feb 10 1995 09:26 | 4 |
| Jamie, just remember, "Better living through chemicals", ooops, thats
_Dupont_! :-)
- Josh
|
387.88 | taxes, like mean people, suck. | SUBPAC::MAGGARD | Mail Order Wives | Fri Feb 10 1995 11:14 | 9 |
| > Worse yet, we just got a statement from Eastman Chemical saying that we
> still have a balance of $0.02.
Just watch... you'll get audited for being a home-broker and that measly $0.02
will cost ya $3895.23 in back taxes and penalties!
:-)
- jeff
|
387.89 | been there, been done to | SMURF::PETERT | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Fri Feb 10 1995 12:36 | 17 |
| Jamie, I know what you mean. When I worked for Prime I was in the
stock plan there. But then Prime got taken over and the shares
(all 35 of them) got turned into some money and some partial
debentures or whatever for the remainder. Lots of gnarly
paperwork and massive forms and yearly payouts of $2 or so and
lord almighty I'm glad its finally over with. Short term and
long term capitol gains/losses of less than $50 dollars and
I think theres still some (6 ?) debentures or shares or
whatchamalcallit floating around somewhere, and a fairly recent call
from an investor wondering what we were going to do with them
(HEy we used the papers to start up the woodstove during last
years blizzard, so bug off man!) When it got to be only a few
bucks a year we decided it wasn't even worth declaring. Hope they
don't bother to tell us we've been wrong. ;-)
PeterT
|
387.90 | | ASDG::IDE | My mind's lost in a household fog. | Fri Feb 10 1995 12:49 | 7 |
| At least we have all the paperwork, I'd hate to think about re-creating this
paper trail. I did get an excellent tour of form production over the last 1/4
century -- from a hand typed form to a fancy customized laser printed statement.
It makes me long for the good old days when you could get screwed over with that
personal touch instead of the cold slap of technology.
Jamie
|
387.91 | tax man | WECARE::ROBERTS | climb a ladder to the stars | Fri Feb 10 1995 12:58 | 3 |
| Me, I take all this stuf to my CPA_guy. My trusty manila envelope is
stuffed already and I'm still waiting for the 1099 to show up.
|
387.92 | but you didn't hear this from ME :-) | SUBPAC::MAGGARD | Mail Order Wives | Fri Feb 10 1995 17:20 | 9 |
|
re: recreating a paper trail
easy ... a few hours with MS Word and a laser printer and you can make
ANYTHING :-)
- jeff
|
387.93 | Reply from Italy | ESTASI::GIUSSANI | | Thu Feb 16 1995 12:49 | 18 |
| Hi everybody,
Sorry if I'm wronging Notes. I'm writing from Italy and I'd need to
have information about DeadBase.
Just the quick story. Eight months ago i did an International Money
Order in favour of DeadBase Orders to buy the DB VIII. They confimed me
the receiving of my payment and the next shipping, but at the present
time I have received nothing. Please, does anyone give me the telephon
number (and possibly the FAX number) of DeadBase ?
The address is : DeadBase Orders
P.O. BOX 499
03755 Hanover, NH.
I thank you in advance for any help.
Ciao.
Donato Giussani (DEC Milano,Italy) (ESTASI::GIUSSANI)
|
387.94 | Strange | CSLALL::LEBLANC_C | Please don't dominate the rapJACK | Thu Feb 16 1995 13:04 | 5 |
| Donato my man
Directory Assistance has no listing for anything under DeadBase
maybe customs is holding it up?
chris
|
387.95 | John Scott | WECARE::ROBERTS | climb a ladder to the stars | Thu Feb 16 1995 14:52 | 8 |
| anyway - the guy you want is John Scott. He lives in South Cornish,
New Hampshire : (603)542-2945. If you get to speak with him, tell
him 'Hi from Carol, niece of Lois'.
Such a small world after all - my grandparents were from Palermo and from
Florence...talk about strange bedfellows!
Carol
|
387.96 | | WECARE::ROBERTS | climb a ladder to the stars | Thu Feb 16 1995 14:53 | 1 |
| and i should add ... Hanover, NH is where he gets business things done.
|
387.97 | For Carol | MLNOIS::GIUSSANI | | Mon Feb 20 1995 08:35 | 17 |
| Carol,
I thank you very much for the info you gave me.
Saturday 18 Feb., I called John and we clarified everything. He said me
that the missing DeadBase shipping was due to his probably Int'l Money
Order lost. He will send me the DB VIII in a couple of days with no
additional costs. I'm looking forward to read the DB VIII !
Thank you again Carol, and if you need anything from Italy feel free to
contact me at any time, by sending an email to GIUSSANI @MLN
or ESTASI::GIUSSANI
Ciao.
Donato
|
387.98 | DCU | DELNI::DSMITH | We'll make great pets | Tue Mar 14 1995 14:09 | 7 |
|
In case people havn't noticed this yet, the DCU is offering
a 9 month certificate which has a 6.80% return on a
minimum investment of $1500.
That's an extremely good rate for a non risky investment
for under a year.
|
387.99 | grab that cash with both hands and make a stash... | HAZEL::YOUNG | where is this place in space??? | Tue Mar 14 1995 15:29 | 5 |
| Donno...the DCU not risky??? But you're right Dean-o...6.8% looks mighty
fine...maybe i'll through some money their way...do you have to be a
member???
Dugo
|
387.100 | Q3 rumors: not good | SUBPAC::MAGGARD | Mail Order Wives | Tue Mar 14 1995 17:27 | 5 |
|
Well, based on the rumors I hear... I might be dumpin some Digistock and going
with that 6.8% CD deal!
- jeff
|
387.101 | alert! | NETCAD::SIEGEL | The revolution wil not be televised | Wed Mar 15 1995 12:40 | 12 |
| Keep in mind that the certificate does not make 6.8% in 9 months. The 6.8% is
the APY (annual percentage yield). It's a gimmick they use to entice you into
buying the certificate. Over 9 months, you actually make slightly less than
5.1%. If you leave your money in for more than 9 months, they automatically
re-start the certificate at the rate that's in effect on that future date, and
then you can realize a 6.8% gain after an additional 3 months.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
adam
ps. I knew it was too good to be true
|
387.102 | | DELNI::DSMITH | We'll make great pets | Wed Mar 15 1995 16:22 | 8 |
|
Adam, you are right, but this is still a good short term investment....
blows away the money market savings account fer ser. The 6.80%
would probably also be valid in a 12 mos. investment.
Definitely not risky. In the disclosure they mentioned that the
money would be returned without penalty if the DCU was liquidated
or if the certificate owner dies.
|
387.103 | | NAC::TRAMP::GRADY | Subvert the dominant pair of dimes | Thu Mar 16 1995 07:16 | 4 |
| Yeah, I really doubt that it's a gimmick, per se, to quote the APR and
yield that way - in fact, they're required by law to do that. All told,
it's a decent, safe, short-term investment...
|
387.104 | | BIODTL::JC | Green is the colour | Wed Mar 22 1995 19:55 | 17 |
| first off, DCU is FDIC insured or insured by the other guys.
you have problems if you have over 100k there.
second, all banks quote APY. DCU does it just like the others
so one can competitively evaluate
third, 6.8 is f*g nice. look in the papers and tell me how
close others are coming on 9 mo CDs. even the 1 and 2-yr
CDs struggle to get close to this.
fourth, i put 4k in it!
psyched.
fifth, i'm over 200+ notes behind in here.
leading 2 version at one time plus planning _2_ more future versions
for release _this_ year is hectic.
:-)
|
387.105 | whassup widda stock? | SUBPAC::MAGGARD | Mail Order Wives | Fri Mar 24 1995 14:08 | 7 |
|
Did Digital announce the Q3 numbers today?
The stock is up 2 5/8 all of a sudden.
- jeff
|
387.106 | | USOPS::MNELSON | Inspiration, move me Brightly | Fri Mar 24 1995 14:18 | 5 |
|
The market is at 4130+. Tech stocks up in general.
Q3 results not due until 3rd Wednesday after q-end.
Mark
|
387.107 | | BIODTL::JC | Green is the colour | Mon Apr 10 1995 13:48 | 9 |
| re <<< Note 387.105 by SUBPAC::MAGGARD "Mail Order Wives" >>>
-< whassup widda stock? >-
>Did Digital announce the Q3 numbers today?
ah, don't forget, the qtr end(ed) mar 31.
should expect an announcement 3rd weds in apr.
personally, at 40+, i'd recommend SELLING HAHD!!~
|
387.108 | Place yer bets!!!! | SUBPAC::MAGGARD | Mail Order Wives | Wed Apr 12 1995 23:01 | 15 |
| re: JC
> should expect an announcement 3rd weds in apr.
> personally, at 40+, i'd recommend SELLING HAHD!!~
Already did. Some of it over 40 even! :-)
Palmer said he expects profits in Q3 and Q4, and Wall Street expects ~$40 mil
in profits from us on Apr 19th. While I'd love to see $150+mil profit, I
don't thunk it'll happin... ...but just in case it does, I won't sell ALL of
my <$20 stock just yet :-)
- jeff_just_paid_unkle_
sammy_for_1994....:-(
|
387.109 | | BIODTL::JC | Green is the colour | Thu Apr 13 1995 21:52 | 10 |
| i'm on the fence to sell or not sell.
one hand, i don't need the cash, so i can stand to wait.
on the other hand, if it goes to 30, i missed out on $1k
(plan to sell 100).
btw,... if anyone plans to sell more than 125 shares or so,
get the certs and xfr to a disc. broker. cheaper commisions
plus you can set stop losses, sell while you hold on the phone, etc.
i have my at my broker
|
387.110 | | DELNI::DSMITH | We'll make great pets | Fri Apr 14 1995 11:23 | 7 |
|
The word around here is "Digital is doing very well".
I don't know what that means, I was hoping all numbers
would be published by now, so we'd see first hand.
Publish em, dammit!!!!
|
387.111 | | NAC::TRAMP::GRADY | Subvert the dominant pair of dimes | Fri Apr 14 1995 11:23 | 2 |
| It means that the stock closed at 45 1/8 yesterday...but it
probably doesn't mean much else..;-)
|
387.112 | | BIODTL::JC | Green is the colour | Fri Apr 14 1995 17:25 | 9 |
| the rubber hits the rd next weds; let's see what the results show.
my guess is that they will be ok, but the stock won't move much 'cuz
it's already done its moving...
glad to be in espp for the full draw.
buy price is gonna be 27 1/2 or so, yeeah?///
that's almost $20 / share gain...
|
387.113 | | SMURF::HAPGOOD | Java Java HEY! | Mon Apr 17 1995 10:48 | 15 |
| <<< Note 387.109 by BIODTL::JC "Green is the colour" >>>
>btw,... if anyone plans to sell more than 125 shares or so,
>get the certs and xfr to a disc. broker. cheaper commisions
>plus you can set stop losses, sell while you hold on the phone, etc.
>i have my at my broker
I think this is good advice....
How much of a cheaper commision though? There's been a few times where
the commision I did have to pay at a discount broker offset the loss I
would have had by letting DEC sell my stock....
bob
|
387.114 | | BIODTL::JC | Green is the colour | Tue Apr 18 1995 14:55 | 10 |
| re <<< Note 387.113 by SMURF::HAPGOOD "Java Java HEY!" >>>
>How much of a cheaper commision though? There's been a few times where
>the commision I did have to pay at a discount broker offset the loss I
>would have had by letting DEC sell my stock....
it really isn't much cheaper. maybe 10 bucks or so. the _biggest_ win
is the ability to set stop-loss sells and to be able to sell at a precise
time (ie: when you call) vs. having the long wait w/ IS.
|
387.115 | | SMURF::HAPGOOD | Java Java HEY! | Tue Apr 18 1995 15:16 | 12 |
| <<< Note 387.114 by BIODTL::JC "Green is the colour" >>>
>it really isn't much cheaper. maybe 10 bucks or so. the _biggest_ win
>is the ability to set stop-loss sells and to be able to sell at a precise
>time (ie: when you call) vs. having the long wait w/ IS.
Oh I read ya loud and clear - the wife_unit is a broker and she's drilled me
repeatedly....
bob
|
387.116 | | WECARE::ROBERTS | climb a ladder to the stars | Wed Apr 19 1995 13:38 | 5 |
|
$$$So DID we or DIDN'T we
Make a PROFIT, PROPHET
|
387.117 | | ALFA2::DWEST | but i play one on tv... | Wed Apr 19 1995 13:50 | 1 |
| did...
|
387.118 | | WECARE::ROBERTS | climb a ladder to the stars | Wed Apr 19 1995 13:54 | 5 |
|
so i see the we have a net income of $xxxx but that doesn't necessarily
mean a profi does it?
|
387.119 | | SMURF::HAPGOOD | Java Java HEY! | Wed Apr 19 1995 14:02 | 9 |
| So we got a profit of .44 per share.
Why does the stock drop (2 points last time I looked)...
I know it *always* does when we announce our earnings but why? Is Wall
Street disappointed with us?
on the whole things are starting to looking up (it seems).
bob
|
387.120 | | USOPS::MNELSON | Inspiration, move me Brightly | Wed Apr 19 1995 14:05 | 5 |
|
Buy on rumor, SELL on news.
|
387.121 | all that profit must be from DS at the trade shows... :^) :^) :^) | ALFA2::DWEST | but i play one on tv... | Wed Apr 19 1995 16:36 | 13 |
| i think we'll be in the black for the year... we're 2 for 3 so far on
the quarterly results...
i'm actually looking for the stock to fall again when that guy out in
california sells... (anyone besides me remember that guy who bought
millions with his own money betting on the turnaound? his target price
for this year was around $50 i think)
it's also normal for our stock to go up a bit in the couple of days
before our results are announced and then drop back afterwards...
(see "buy on rumors, sell on news")...
da ve_psyched_to_be_doing_his_part
|
387.122 | | BIODTL::JC | Green is the colour | Fri Apr 21 1995 03:05 | 6 |
| the WSJ attributed the price drop to profit taking.
Techs were off for the most part also.
like others have said, buy on rumor, sell on news.
i'd say a visit to the 38 range, then a trading range 40-43
|
387.123 | | ROCK::FROMM | This space intentionally left blank. | Fri Apr 21 1995 11:08 | 8 |
| what is the stock trading at now?
i've had no luck getting thru to either the internal DEC quotation, or the
complete list of stocks on the web for the past several days.
(and no, i can't just check a newspaper. i don't get one.)
- rich
|
387.124 | | ASDG::IDE | My mind's lost in a household fog. | Fri Apr 21 1995 11:39 | 9 |
| re .123
The HLO2 library gets all sorts of newspapers, including the WSJ and
Globe. You could also pick one up at a newsstand.
Someone's been posting the prices pretty regularly in
nyoss1::digital_investing.
Jamie
|
387.125 | | WECARE::ROBERTS | climb a ladder to the stars | Fri Apr 21 1995 14:25 | 7 |
| RE: .123
>(and no, i can't just check a newspaper. i don't get one.)
so RICH! Does this mean you are boycotting newspapers? :-) :-)
how many hours without newspapers so far?
|
387.126 | | ROCK::FROMM | This space intentionally left blank. | Fri Apr 21 1995 14:56 | 27 |
| > >(and no, i can't just check a newspaper. i don't get one.)
> so RICH! Does this mean you are boycotting newspapers? :-) :-)
no, i just think that they're a huge waste of paper, and i don't know if i'd
read it enough to make it worthwhile. maybe if i could get just the front
section. but i'd rather deal with an electronic form that was convenient to
get and to read.
and i don't boycott tv either. i just don't think there's enough worthwhile to
pay for either tv service (we never subscribed to cable when i grew up) or to
go out and buy a tv. i wish more computer monitors (i.e. something besides
commodore) could accept NTSC input. if/when i ever get a computer (the only
one i currently own is a 50% share of a VIC20), if i could get a monitor that
accepted NTSC composite video as an input, i'd probably get that and then buy
a VCR. but, if i'm around TV, and if there's something interesting on, i might
watch it. the 2 main things i watched when i lived in a house with a TV were
the Simpsons and Seinfeld.
my main source of news is NPR. behind that is various computer forms of media
(it's incredible how many things i hear first in GRATEFUL). i do currently
subscribe to TIME magazine, but i'll probably drop it when my subscription is
up because: 1) it's a joke for them to be still calling it a news magazine (it
usually either seems to swing towards being a big editorial page or a People
magazine lookalike), and 2) you can read it for free on the Web. does anyone
have any recommendations of weekly news magazines that they think are good?
- rich
|
387.127 | relax, don't worry.... | SUBPAC::MAGGARD | Mail Order Wives | Fri Apr 21 1995 15:51 | 6 |
|
<- Gang... please go easy on our buddy Rich... they're workin' 'im hahd!!!
:-)
- jeff
|
387.128 | rebound from profit taking... | SUBPAC::MAGGARD | Mail Order Wives | Fri Apr 21 1995 15:52 | 7 |
|
Pee Ess...
Stock is +2 today :-)
- jeff
|
387.129 | | DELNI::LKGREF | | Mon Apr 24 1995 13:14 | 4 |
| closed at 45 on friday .. not bad. so the low for this period was 18.?
- a mighty pretty penny if i say so myself.
|
387.130 | | BIODTL::JC | Green is the colour | Mon Apr 24 1995 18:46 | 3 |
| looking at the buy of 27 1/2, i think.
64% up since then @ 45
|
387.131 | | NAC::TRAMP::GRADY | Subvert the dominant pair of dimes | Tue Apr 25 1995 08:46 | 5 |
| It ain't June 1st yet. It ain't even close.
I'll believe it when I see it...
|
387.132 | | BIODTL::JC | Green is the colour | Thu May 04 1995 00:43 | 3 |
| re: 3.5 wks away.
i say 48 1-jun.
|
387.133 | | SUBPAC::MAGGARD | Mail Order Wives | Thu May 04 1995 10:13 | 7 |
|
C'mon 50 !!!!
:-)
- jeff
|
387.134 | | WECARE::ROBERTS | climb a ladder to the stars | Thu May 04 1995 11:34 | 3 |
| so we can put in the "SELL" order early like other times?
|
387.135 | | BIODTL::JC | Green is the colour | Mon May 08 1995 16:07 | 11 |
| re <<< Note 387.134 by WECARE::ROBERTS "climb a ladder to the stars" >>>
> so we can put in the "SELL" order early like other times?
i would think so.
i'm going to hold this lot
for bigger gains later.
|
387.136 | Yahoo! | SUBPAC::MAGGARD | Mail Order Wives | Mon May 22 1995 18:23 | 34 |
|
---------> <-----------
^
|
Missed 50 by THIS much!!!!
Big day for high techs!
Microsoft +1 7/8
Intel +2 5/8
IBM +2
HP +1 5/8
Motorola +1 1/4
Digital got to it's highest in 2 years today... how many of us can say that we
did the same today??? :-)
- jeff
---------------------------
http://www.secapl.com:81/cgi-bin/qsx sez:
Symbol : DEC Exchange : New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)
Description : DIGITAL EQUIP CORP
Last Traded at: 48.7500 Date/Time : May 22 4:00:40
$ Change : 1.7500 % Change : 3.72
Volume : 1198500 # of Trades : 379
Day Low : 47.0000 Day High : 49.3750
52 Week Low : 18.3750 52 Week High: 49.3750
|
387.137 | no merger blues | SMURF::HAPGOOD | Java Java HEY! | Tue May 23 1995 09:06 | 9 |
| <<< Note 387.136 by SUBPAC::MAGGARD "Mail Order Wives" >>>
>Big day for high techs!
>Microsoft +1 7/8
Did you see what happened to Intuit yesterday? Took the *big* hit....
bob
|
387.138 | where's those sell instructions? | ALFA1::DWEST | but i play one on tv... | Tue May 23 1995 11:10 | 6 |
| isn't there a reply in here that has the instructions for placing an
order to sell ahead? i was looking for it, thinking i'd put in an
order to seel when we buy on the first, but i can't find it...
clues?
da ve
|
387.139 | | STOWOA::JOLLIMORE | Dancing Madly Backwards | Tue May 23 1995 11:11 | 1 |
| VTX IS ---> Menu Item 1 Sell Stock --> Menu Item 2 Common Questions/Answers
|
387.140 | | ALFA2::DWEST | but i play one on tv... | Tue May 23 1995 18:17 | 1 |
| thank you... :^)
|
387.141 | | WECARE::ROBERTS | climb a ladder to the stars | Wed May 24 1995 10:26 | 3 |
| Digital stock closed yesterday at 49 1/8 ! very cool
|
387.142 | From Milano,Italy | SQUALO::GIUSSANI | | Wed Jun 14 1995 13:44 | 7 |
| Please, does anybody give me the correct address of Dalton Center
(street, Zip, Town, and possibly FAX#). I suppose Dalton Center is in
San Francisco, CA.
I thank you in advance for any help.
Ciao.
Donato
|
387.143 | | ZENDIA::FERGUSON | The Janitor of coding returns! | Tue Oct 31 1995 22:51 | 6 |
| Well, i got my 401k statement.
i'm psyched that the 3 funds i'm in were the 3 top-performing funds
this past qtr , and year for that matter (all of 'em 29% return and up!)
go long.
invest in equities(stocks)
|
387.144 | money saving tip | ZENDIA::FERGUSON | Run, run, run for the roses | Tue Nov 14 1995 14:26 | 79 |
| so, open enrollment time for full-time decheads.
2 programs folks in here may wish to consider are the HCRA
and DCRA programs. these are programs that allow you to
set aside pre-tax dollars to reijmburse you for out-of-pocket
health care related costs, such as the co-payment that many
HMOs charge. HCRA is for you and your spouse, provided that
your spouse is _not_ a dependent of yours. DCRA is for
your dependents. for example, deb is my spouse and i do
not claim her as a dependent, so, i can use dollars i put
in HCRA to reimburse both deb and i for out-of-pocket health
care costs. this includes lots of things:
- HMO co-payments
- eye glasses
- mileage to and from the place of service
- prescriptions,
- dental!
min and max for hcra is 6/wk and 40/wk respectively.
DCRA is more for dependents, and, i believe child care is
also included as a reimbursable item (check your bene book
or call 'em to find out what is fair game for reimbursement).
so, if you have childcare costs of $100 /wk, you can get
most of that reimbursed via your DCRA account. i think the
min you can do for this one is 6/wk and the max is 96/wk.
the downside risk to this whole thing is use or lose it.
that is, if you do 10/wk, which is 520/yr, and your out-of-pocket
costs are only 400 for the yr, you forfeit $120. depending on
your tax situation, this 120 loss may still be better than
if you paid your costs with taxed dollars.
why is this good?
'cuz it is PRE-TAX dollars!
rough figuring here:
SS/medicare tax 7%
max state inc. tax 5%
fed tax 18%
---
30%
1 dollar of real money really costs you about $1.43 in taxable income.
so, if you go out and pay $200.00 for a new pair of glasses, it really
cost you 1.43 * 200 = $286.00. if you used an HCRA for this, you
would save yourself $86.00.
this really requires you to get a handle on your out-of-pocket
health care expenses for the yr. if you _know_ you are going to
glasses (or any big ticket item), it makes a lot of sense to sign up,
for example. or, if you
know you are going to have childcare expense, again, it makes sense.
the numbers do add up fast. if you spend 100/wk for childcare, under
the taxable scenerio it cost you (100 * 52 * 1.43) $7436 for the year.
using a DCRA reimbursement account w/ ther tax contribution, it would cost:
4 * 52 * 1.43 = 297
96 * 52 * 1 = 4992
----
5289
for a saving of more than $2000.00 in one year !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BUT...
if your health care costs are small each year, it probably
DOES NOT make sense to use a reim. account. i never used one
before because by myself, i rarely had more than 50/yr in out-of-pocket
health care expenses. so, be sure to check your case out
carefully and run your questions by a more qualified benefits
person!
check it out.
be sure you FULLY UNDERSTAND the details before you sign up.
i may not have every detail correct here, so, BE SURE TO DOUBLE
CHECK IT....
lator!
|
387.145 | | ASDG::IDE | My mind's lost in a household fog. | Tue Nov 14 1995 14:49 | 18 |
| re .144
What figure is used for mileage reimbursement, the IRS's or DEC's?
Another big advantage (at least of HCRA, dunno 'bout DCRA) is that you
can submit claims for more money than is in your account at that time.
For example, you could submit a $150 claim for glasses in January, even
though there would be just a week or two worth of money in the account.
The only downsides are that, as JC mentioned, you have to use it or lose
it, and there's a little extra paperwork involved.
I just found out about the plans recently and we've been poring over
this year's bills to set the contribution rate. It's amazing how those
$2 and $5 co-pays add up, and we've had a very healthy year.
Jamie
|
387.146 | Not worthit for me | DELNI::DSMITH | and they keep on dancin | Tue Nov 14 1995 14:54 | 6 |
|
If I had medical problems I would do this..otherwise, I think it's
totally useless. Co-pays for Havard Comm. Health are $3 an office
visit/prescription/whatever. I spent a total of $0 on copays for 1995.
I wouldn't benefit out of something like this at all, as a matter of
fact, I get screwed!
|
387.147 | | CXDOCS::BARNES | | Tue Nov 14 1995 15:35 | 4 |
| I wanna hire JC as my financial advisor.....
rfb
|
387.148 | caution eyebrows in motion... | SMURF::PETERT | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Tue Nov 14 1995 23:09 | 15 |
| Juat put in for the HCRA. I definitely need some new glasses
and I'm just waiting till after the first. We usually use the DCRA
but my wife is planning on quitting her job, so that will cut
down on child care expenses, and most of that can be
written off (to an extent). Since we're in flux on that, we
decided not to put out for it this year.
You know, the weird thing about my glasses is that after a while,
I always get this blurry spot near the upper outside corner of my
left lens. Frankly I think my eyebrows end up eventually wearing
down and scratching the coating. The people in the eyeglass stores
that I've mentioned this to thinks its a bit too farfetched.
PeterT
|
387.149 | | PAUPER::SIEGEL | The revolution wil not be televised | Wed Nov 15 1995 13:36 | 4 |
| Can someone put in some details regarding the Sam Adams offering. I'm in
the money for some investing - would you recommend it?
adam
|
387.150 | | PILO3::HANNAN | Beyond description... | Wed Nov 15 1995 14:24 | 9 |
| re: <<< Note 387.149 by PAUPER::SIEGEL "The revolution wil not be televised" >>>
> Can someone put in some details regarding the Sam Adams offering. I'm in
> the money for some investing - would you recommend it?
I think you have to get a card explaining the offering from a 6-pack.
I noticed some at a liquor store recently...
/Ken
|
387.151 | | BSS::DSMITH | A Harley, & the Dead the good life | Wed Nov 15 1995 14:48 | 10 |
|
I called them yesterday and the offering is now closed!
The deadline for the mail-in is 16 Nov. at 12:00 noon..
I mailed mine yesterday by overnight mail I kind of doubt getting in on
this but what the hell it's worth a try.
Divide Dave
|
387.152 | | SMURF::HAPGOOD | Java Java HEY! | Wed Nov 15 1995 15:07 | 29 |
| <<< Note 387.151 by BSS::DSMITH "A Harley, & the Dead the good life" >>>
Hey Divide Dave,
> I called them yesterday and the offering is now closed!
Did this mean when you called them that it would be useless to mail at all
today on the 15th? I mean was it CLOSED on the 15th? Or was it going to
close out as it said it would on the 16th at noon.
:)
As for this thing -
you could make some dough - you could lose some dough.
it wouldbe nice to have the certificates in your hot little hands but those
getting in on the consumer offering will have to wait until "mid december"
for them and who knows what'll happen after the other 1/2 of this offering
(the investor half) is done making a buck off of the inital frenzy.
I also thought it was interesting that-
-kuch?koch? is the only one who has any beer experience that is an
executive in that company.
- that koch needs money.
- that 2 of the distribs that make his beer are filing chapt. 11.
so what did I do? I sent em so dough :)
bobo
|
387.153 | | BSS::DSMITH | A Harley, & the Dead the good life | Wed Nov 15 1995 15:12 | 16 |
|
When I called there was a recorded message that stated they would not
be mailing out any of the forms you have to fill out in order to buy
stock.
I got lucky (I think) and got a form from RFB and mailed it overnight
yesterday to be there by noon today.
Thats all I know, if I get any stock it will luck, but as rfb say its
like sending in for mail order you don't if you'll get'em but the worst
that can happen is you get your monery back.
Divide Dave
|
387.154 | or PEte's | WILLEE::OSTIGUY | the eyes of man have not set foot | Wed Nov 15 1995 15:29 | 3 |
| wow, I missed it...and I tell folks that I'm a majority stock holder in
Sam Adams products...evidenced by the keg-like dimensions of my Sam
Adams like belly :)))
|
387.155 | | SUBPAC::MAGGARD | Mail Ordered Husband | Wed Nov 15 1995 16:48 | 4 |
|
See note 923.* of NYOSS1::MARKET_INVESTING for details on the Boston Beer
Company IPO...
|
387.156 | | SUBPAC::MAGGARD | Mail Ordered Husband | Wed Nov 15 1995 17:00 | 18 |
|
re: .152
Yeah, the whole "can't sell 'til Xmas" thing about it could leave lots of
folks with a nasty aftertaste... buying a stock at a fixed price and no price
history then being forced to wait three to four weeks before you can sell it
is a pretty big risk, IMO.
But then it might go the way of NSCP and be a nice green bundle of joy for the
holidays. (Netscape opened at about double the IPO price, currently about
triple the IPO price).
Place yer bets ... ;-)
|
387.157 | | CXDOCS::BARNES | | Wed Nov 15 1995 18:02 | 3 |
| oh shit...I'm gettin nervous already......beerthirty....
rfb
|
387.158 | | ZENDIA::FERGUSON | Run, run, run for the roses | Thu Nov 16 1995 00:48 | 8 |
| re <<< Note 387.145 by ASDG::IDE "My mind's lost in a household fog." >>>
> What figure is used for mileage reimbursement, the IRS's or DEC's?
cannot remember.
it is in the range of .22-.25 /mi
|
387.159 | Mickey Mouse? | ZENDIA::FERGUSON | Run, run, run for the roses | Thu Nov 16 1995 00:49 | 6 |
| re <<< Note 387.147 by CXDOCS::BARNES >>>
> I wanna hire JC as my financial advisor.....
i have an easy payment program: beer, or, ah... ah, nevermind.
:-)
|
387.160 | | ZENDIA::FERGUSON | Run, run, run for the roses | Thu Nov 16 1995 00:51 | 11 |
| re <<< Note 387.149 by PAUPER::SIEGEL "The revolution wil not be televised" >>>
>Can someone put in some details regarding the Sam Adams offering. I'm in
>the money for some investing - would you recommend it?
no.
stick your $$ in a good mutual fund and let the big boys
manage your $$. let me tell you, it is nerve wracking
doing the buy-your-own-stocks thing. in fact, i want to
move more to just mutual fund stuff with maybe a little
playing around in the options mkt for fun.
|
387.161 | caveat emptor | ASDG::IDE | My mind's lost in a household fog. | Thu Nov 16 1995 08:23 | 33 |
| re .152
As far as I know, Koch has no brewing experience. There's no
great-great-grandfather's secret recipe, it was developed by brewing
consultants. To top it off, Sam Adams was not even a brewer (he was a
malster). Jim Koch is the Betty Crocker of beer, except that he's not
a complete fiction.
For those who don't know, Sam Adams owns a small showcase brewery in
Jamaica Plans, but the vast majority of SA products are brewed under
contract at breweries in New York, Oregon, and Germany. I haven't
heard if they plan to use the capital raised from this IPO to construct
a brewery. Pete's Wicked Ale recently went public (and did very well
with its IPO) for that purpose. Currently, Pete's empire consists of
a rented office in Santa Clara, Ca.
I don't think Koch needs money, rather that some of the original
investors want to cash in. None of the above means that Jim Koch is a
bad guy or that BBC is a bad investment. I have a tremendous respect
for anyone who can start a successful business without much capital.
He's achieved tremendous market penetration -- I was in San Francisco
last week and Sam Adams products were much more readily available than
Anchor or Sierra Nevada. I'm also impressed by Sam Adams' quality and
cosistency; most of the microbrews I've bought in bottles have been
stale or worse. Just last week I drank a six pack of Bridgeport ale (a
respected Oregon brewery) that was stale and highly overcarbonated.
BTW, The Oregon beers are Boston Beer Company products. Retailers were
reluctant to devote more shelf space to Sam Adams products, so Koch
simply started another brand name. With his distribution network
already in place, this was an extremely smart move.
Jamie
|
387.162 | | PILO3::HANNAN | Beyond description... | Thu Nov 16 1995 08:33 | 10 |
| re: <<< Note 387.161 by ASDG::IDE "My mind's lost in a household fog." >>>
> BTW, The Oregon beers are Boston Beer Company products. Retailers were
Interesting, but I find it surprising because I think the Oregon -brand
beer is pretty lousy stuff... whereas SA is typically good brew.
xref <<<grate beer>>>
/Ken
|
387.163 | | CXDOCS::BARNES | | Thu Nov 16 1995 10:58 | 8 |
| those west cost brewers LOVE to dump in their locally grown hops, too
much so for my tastes
I'm looking at the Sam's stock thang as a short term investment, unlike
the mutual funds thang being a long term one. (which I'll prob never
see anyway, but hopefully Patyy and my kids will)
rfb_non_hophead_non_finace_head_but_boy_can_I_spend_money!!!
|
387.164 | False advertising | FABSIX::T_BEAULIEU | Like A steam Locomotive | Thu Nov 16 1995 12:18 | 9 |
|
I thought that SA was originally brewed in Pittsburg?
(thought I heard this last year)
I didn't know Oregon beers were BBC products.
I love the IPA!
Toby
|
387.165 | My view of BBC offering ... | XANADU::KENMAN::matthews | | Wed Nov 22 1995 02:44 | 17 |
| IMHO, the BBC stock offering to the general public (via six-packs, no less) is a "fun" thing for
the company and should be considered so by anyone participating. I venture they did it that way
for publicity and to get SA lovers even more entrenched with the product. I mean, who wouldn't
want to be able to say, "isn't this a great beer ... and I'm a stockholder too!"
In any case, while it is always a wise investing move to buy into co's where you know something
about the product (as "the product" often is essential to the company's strength), it is still a
flyer. I would not be depending on "investments" like this to fund my retirement, for example,
or for a short-term, get-rich-quick thing. (Usually the way to make money in stocks is to HOLD
'em for the long term -- you only make the big short term killings when you are a pro watching
the ticker and overhearing the right news in the restroom <g>)
It's a fun thing -- Xmas present to yourself and significant other. I bet the certs will be
framable, the annual report fun and --- imagine what the stockholders meeting will be like!
Mmmmmm, tasty!
But, *SIGH* , I missed the deadline too. Maybe Sierra Nevada will go public ...
|
387.167 | reformatted to fit your screen ... | MKOTS3::JOLLIMORE | I'm drowning in you | Wed Nov 22 1995 10:28 | 24 |
| <<< Note 387.165 by XANADU::KENMAN::matthews >>>
-< My view of BBC offering ... >-
IMHO, the BBC stock offering to the general public (via six-packs, no less) is
a "fun" thing for the company and should be considered so by anyone partici-
pating. I venture they did it that way for publicity and to get SA lovers
even more entrenched with the product. I mean, who wouldn't want to be able
to say, "isn't this a great beer ... and I'm a stockholder too!"
In any case, while it is always a wise investing move to buy into co's where
you know something about the product (as "the product" often is essential to
the company's strength), it is still a flyer. I would not be depending on
"investments" like this to fund my retirement, for example, or for a short-
term, get-rich-quick thing. (Usually the way to make money in stocks is to
HOLD 'em for the long term -- you only make the big short term killings when
you are a pro watching the ticker and overhearing the right news in the
restroom <g>)
It's a fun thing -- Xmas present to yourself and significant other. I bet the
certs will be framable, the annual report fun and --- imagine what the stock-
holders meeting will be like! Mmmmmm, tasty!
But, *SIGH* , I missed the deadline too. Maybe Sierra Nevada will go public
...
|
387.168 | sounds like a good first day to me... | AITRNG::DWEST | his job is to shed light... | Wed Nov 22 1995 11:39 | 3 |
| i hear on it's first trading day it went up over 8 points?
da ve
|
387.169 | | SMURF::HAPGOOD | Java Java HEY! | Wed Nov 22 1995 12:56 | 15 |
| Da ve,
close to doubling.....
BUT the consumer offering folks won't get their stock certificates until
"early to mid december" and who knows what it will be like then.
Symbol : SAM Exchange : New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)
Description :
Last Traded at: 28.0000 Date/Time : Nov 21
Volume : 3474200 # of Trades : 1250
Day Low : 26.8750 Day High : 32.1250
52 Week Low : 26.8750 52 Week High: 32.1250
|
387.170 | Up nearly 40% to $28 | XANADU::KENMAN::matthews | | Wed Nov 22 1995 14:12 | 7 |
| The article here in USA Today says it "soared nearly 40% to $28 on its first day of trading
Tuesday." That's what Pete's did, too.
For the record, the article continues on to say that "Customers got the best deal. The stock was
offered initially at $20. but boston Beer let customers buy up to 33 shares at $15 apiece when
the IPO was expected to be priced between $10 and $15."
|
387.171 | | SMURF::HAPGOOD | Java Java HEY! | Wed Nov 22 1995 14:21 | 7 |
| Someone told me that they got nearly 3 times the interest in the consumer
offering than they were prepared to handle.....so if you mailed in the last
day you probably lost out....
This was on an NPR story....
bob
|
387.172 | | SUBPAC::MAGGARD | Mail Ordered Husband | Wed Nov 29 1995 17:14 | 16 |
|
Not too bad a return on $15 :-)
Symbol : SAM Exchange : New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)
Description :
Last Traded at: 28.3750 Date/Time : Nov 29 4:24:13
Volume : 163900 # of Trades : 285
Day Low : 28.0000 Day High : 29.2500
52 Week Low : 26.8750 52 Week High: 33.0000
- jeff
PS -- NSCP went over $140 today ... all them short sellers must be gettin
pretty damn nervous :-)
|
387.173 | | SERENE::TDAVIS | | Thu Nov 30 1995 08:54 | 2 |
| Does anyone know why the ESPP buy price will be, I am hearing 39.00,
not a bad return.
|
387.174 | Could Be | BINKLY::CEPARSKI | Were They Ever Here At All? | Thu Nov 30 1995 08:56 | 1 |
| Seems I saw somewhere that the ESPP price from June is $37.67.
|
387.175 | | BSS::DSMITH | A Harley, & the Dead the good life | Thu Nov 30 1995 08:59 | 12 |
|
From VTX stock
ESPP Price Information
FMV 01-Dec-94 32.375
FMV 31-May-95 44.312
ESPP 01-Jun-95 27.750
Divide
|
387.176 | I hope | DELNI::DSMITH | and they keep on dancin | Thu Nov 30 1995 09:00 | 6 |
|
The whole stock market raged yesterday. Good thing too! I may wait a few
days and see what happens with the DEC stock. I think we'll hit 60+.
Q: How long does it take from when you apply to sell your stock on
VTX, to when it is actually sold?
|
387.177 | 27.750 is the purchase price?????? | DELNI::DSMITH | and they keep on dancin | Thu Nov 30 1995 09:05 | 4 |
|
> ESPP 01-Jun-95 27.750
Is this true??????? If so, lot's o' people be gittin rich right now.
|
387.178 | | SERENE::TDAVIS | | Thu Nov 30 1995 09:12 | 1 |
| How do you sell from VTX, I forget.
|
387.179 | If My Memory Serves Me Well | BINKLY::CEPARSKI | Were They Ever Here At All? | Thu Nov 30 1995 09:27 | 1 |
| try VTX IS and then follow the destructions
|
387.181 | | BSS::DSMITH | A Harley, & the Dead the good life | Thu Nov 30 1995 09:28 | 18 |
|
RE:387.177
If your on a VMS system just type in VTX Stock and you'll get the
info.
>Is this true??????? Your not questioning the honesty of a DSMITH are
you??
. .
,
\___/
Divide Dave
|
387.180 | here's tfm, dammit! ;-) | SUBPAC::MAGGARD | Mail Ordered Husband | Thu Nov 30 1995 09:29 | 29 |
|
$VTX IS item #2 sez:
VTX IS Common Questions/Answers Update:
26-Oct-95
Q: What is the cut-off for selling?
A: The cut-off is 12:00 noon Eastern Time. VTX IS sell requests are
time-stamped when you fill in information and use FORM ENTER.
Q: Will I get an electronic confirmation?
A: Yes, within a few hours of placing your sell request via VTX IS, you
will receive via E-mail a confirmation from Investor Services that
your sale order was received for processing.
Q: Can I obtain my account balances through VTX IS?
A: Presently, no. Possibly in the future.
Q: How do I sell for December 1st, 1995?
A: Access the Sell Form, fill in ALL for # Shares to Sell, 01-Dec-1995
for the Purchase Date, and E for the Plan Type. (Valid pre-selling
dates for December 1st are Nov 1 - Nov 30th, 12:00 noon, Eastern US
Time.)
Press HELP for options.
|
387.182 | | SUBPAC::MAGGARD | Mail Ordered Husband | Thu Nov 30 1995 09:32 | 9 |
| > Q: How long does it take from when you apply to sell your stock on VTX,
> to when it is actually sold?
Usually next trading day.
This is one disadvantage to Digital's ESPP --- you can't get "real time"
service.
- jeff_holding_for_now
|
387.183 | don't spend that money yet! | SSAG::SNYDER | There are no shortcuts | Thu Nov 30 1995 09:39 | 12 |
| > ESPP Price Information
> FMV 01-Dec-94 32.375
> FMV 31-May-95 44.312
> ESPP 01-Jun-95 27.750
Yes, it's true, but not what you think. The 27.750 applies to the last
period. For this period, we will be buying at 85% of the lower of the
FMV on 01-Jun-95 and 30-Nov-95, rounded up to the nearest quarter
point. Unless the market crashes today, that means we'll be buying at
39, as you've heard.
Sid
|
387.184 | calculation | SSAG::SNYDER | There are no shortcuts | Thu Nov 30 1995 09:56 | 5 |
| Oh, yeah. If you're wondering where the 39 comes from, the FMV of DEC
stock on 01-Jun-95 waas 46.625. 85% of that is 38.78125. Rounded up
to the nearest quarter point yields 39.
Sid
|
387.185 | | ZENDIA::FERGUSON | Run, run, run for the roses | Thu Nov 30 1995 12:00 | 3 |
| I'll be xferring my shares to my disc. brok. acnt so
i can set limits, sell immediately, etc...
|
387.186 | | AOSG::connor.zk3.dec.com::strobel | | Mon Dec 04 1995 13:14 | 5 |
| could go in the feel good news notes as well
12:45pm 12/4/95
DEC 62 3/8 +4 1/2
|
387.187 | | WECARE::ROBERTS | climb a ladder to the stars | Mon Dec 04 1995 13:14 | 6 |
| What's the deal on the stock $$ ? Didn't some fed agency shorten the
length of time that the company has to release the $$? like it used to
take 10 + working days before you'd get your money.
|
387.188 | never fails | ASABET::DCLARK | voodoo mathematician | Mon Dec 04 1995 13:14 | 3 |
| re .-1
that's because I sold my stock on friday
|
387.189 | | AOSG::connor.zk3.dec.com::strobel | | Mon Dec 04 1995 13:17 | 3 |
| Carol:
I believe you're supposed to receive your check (faster with
autodeposit) 3-5 days after the sale
|
387.190 | mine should sell today... :^) | ALFA2::DWEST | the storyteller makes no choice... | Mon Dec 04 1995 13:23 | 7 |
| cool! let's hope it stays up there... $60 has been a "barrier" of
sorts...
also, i placed my order to seel on friday, which means they should sell
today... i'll take those couple extra bux! :^)
da ve
|
387.191 | Retail detail | DELNI::DSMITH | How does that song go? | Mon Dec 04 1995 17:13 | 4 |
|
After watching todays rise, combined with the fact Digital is more
retail oriented this year than ever, I may wait til the week before
Christmas and sell 1/2 of it to pay bills.
|
387.192 | Direct Deposit is 3 business days, BTW | SALEM::MARTIN_S | Perpetual Smile... | Tue Dec 05 1995 10:26 | 7 |
|
I rec'd an E-mail sale confirmation for my DEC01 EPP stock sales.
Souled for 58.183 bought at 39
I'll take 49% any day, thank you.
|
387.193 | | DELNI::DSMITH | How does that song go? | Tue Dec 05 1995 10:31 | 4 |
|
63 3/8 and counting.....
C'mon 70!!!! Let's hear it!!!!!
|
387.194 | | ZENDIA::FERGUSON | Run, run, run for the roses | Fri Dec 08 1995 18:20 | 9 |
| yes, 60 was a major resistance point (to put in W.S. parlance).
we made a lot of runs at 60, but, never busted thru. now we have.
i'd say we'll stay in the low 60s, with a few breaks in the sub-60
territory, which i see as a buying oppty.
i'm holding now, but, will sell.
i have a ton of dec stock at this point.
too much.
time to take some profits.
|
387.195 | | WECARE::ROBERTS | climb a ladder to the stars | Thu Dec 14 1995 08:11 | 10 |
| Very cool development .. I *THOUGHT* I had placed the sell order
last month - no check came and after waiting the required amount of
time one must wait in Wilton for mail (above and beyond normal
delivery) - I called IS to investigate on monday. Turns out I had
never actually filled in the online form or used the touchtone
whatsis. SOOOOO, I sold this past monday ... not too shabby :-) and
then with a gieant leap into the 20th century, I set it up to go into
my DCU directly. ahhh ... maybe i'll never have to go to the mailbox
again!!!
|
387.196 | | ZENDIA::FERGUSON | Control for smilers cant be bought | Wed Dec 20 1995 16:21 | 8 |
| an error pays for itself! not bad carol!
yeah, direct deposit is the only way to fly.
if you get a live check, it takes time to clear.
ACH deposits are avail when they arrive.
jc
|
387.197 | | GRANPA::TDAVIS | | Thu Dec 21 1995 09:33 | 4 |
| I had the same experience as Carol, I had sold two days before
we went down almost 70 points, talk about dumb luck. I had
made an error with the dial up system, and waited weeks for the check,
remembered to follow up, and just made it before the great crash.
|
387.198 | Money can't buy me love | DELNI::DSMITH | Answers aplenty in the by & by | Tue Jan 23 1996 09:25 | 5 |
|
Normally, I don't watch the money but....
My prediction says Digital stock is probably gonna rage real hard over
the next week or so.
|
387.199 | | E::EVANS | | Tue Jan 23 1996 10:16 | 7 |
| Quarterly numbers are out and look good. Analysts predicted 87 cents per
share and we posted 91 (versus 9 cents per share from Q2 a year ago).
This may very well push the stock up. Some good Q3 numbers and we will
be looking at another big stock purchase check.
Jim
|
387.200 | | NECSC::CRONIC::semi3.hlo.dec.com::notes | i believe in Chemo-Girl!!! | Fri May 24 1996 16:46 | 11 |
|
so, we're approaching buy time again and it's not looking too great...
what are folks doing this time??? selling right away? holding for the
numbers for the year?
for my part it's both... i have to retire a credit card so i'll be selling
off some right away, and then holding the rest til the numbers come
out in hopes that the price goes up...
da ve
|
387.201 | | DELNI::DSMITH | Can you see the real me | Fri May 24 1996 17:15 | 5 |
|
I decided to hold. This one's gonna be tough...things seem iffy.
I was planning to dump some existing shares I bought at $37, but I'm
even thinking of sitting on that.
|
387.202 | | MKOTS3::JOLLIMORE | quick beat of an icy heart | Tue May 28 1996 08:28 | 5 |
| my daugher got her license.
my wife needs a new car.
bye-bye dec shares.
|
387.203 | | WECARE::ROBERTS | climb a ladder to the stars | Wed May 29 1996 13:41 | 3 |
| last closing price : 51 3/8
|
387.204 | | E::EVANS | | Fri May 31 1996 17:15 | 4 |
| Well, it lowers the starting price for the next stock purchase.
Jim
|
387.205 | | NETRIX::dan | Dan Harrington | Mon Jun 03 1996 12:40 | 12 |
|
From the "official" stock quote page...
---ESPP Price Information---
| FMV 01-Dec-95 58.187 |
| FMV 31-May-96 52.187 |
| ESPP 01-Jun-96 44.50 |
----------------------------
I chose to hold on for the time being...
Dan
|
387.206 | Hold, looking for 58+ | RAGE::JC | Time to put a new face on life | Mon Jun 03 1996 12:56 | 9 |
| I'm holding for now;
it always dips on the day of the ESPP sale;
I do not need the $$, but i'm over-loaded in DEC at this point.
looking for 57-60 /sh
ideally, 60+
|
387.207 | No summer vacation for me | DELNI::DSMITH | Can you see the real me | Thu Jun 06 1996 14:42 | 6 |
|
OH NO!!!!
What the heck are we doing wrong here.
47 3/4
|
387.208 | | SPECXN::BARNES | | Thu Jun 06 1996 16:15 | 7 |
| no news about pending "shove offs". wait till Q1, when the next 5,000
are let go and if yer lucky enough to be one of the ones left yer stock
will increase. And if yer not so lucky, you'll still have the stock at
a higher cash value....and a looooong summer vacation.
rfb
|
387.209 | i dont know but i been told | NECSC::CRONIC::semi3.hlo.dec.com::notes | i believe in Chemo-Girl!!! | Thu Jun 06 1996 18:09 | 5 |
|
i heard our earnings estimates were lowered by some analysts...
goldman sacks or something like that...
da ve
|
387.210 | | NECSC::CRONIC::semi3.hlo.dec.com::notes | i believe in Chemo-Girl!!! | Thu Jun 06 1996 18:10 | 4 |
| oh, and don't worry... it will climb back to a record high soon...
i know, becasue i placed my sell order this morning before i heard the news
about the tumbling prices... :^(
|
387.211 | | ASDG::IDE | My mind's lost in a household fog. | Fri Jun 07 1996 09:54 | 12 |
| I think we're in for another setback with our Q4 and FY96 results.
I don't see the company doing much to grow the business despite all the
lip service from management. We're still trying to become more
profitable through cutting, which is a losing strategy. I'm
discouraged about our future -- we're constantly setting ourselves up
to fail despite good products and technical advantages.
I fully expect management to offer us "double or nothing" on DS's Group
Incentive Plan. :-)
Jamie
|
387.212 | | MKOTS3::JOLLIMORE | quick beat of an icy heart | Fri Jun 07 1996 10:13 | 5 |
| > to fail despite good products and technical advantages.
this is what really kills me. :-(
|
387.213 | | DELNI::DSMITH | Can you see the real me | Fri Jun 07 1996 10:32 | 5 |
|
I hope our FY96 results will still be positive despite a probable
Q4 loss. Hopefully the past 3 quaters will pay for this one.
Tis painful to watch the stock rise and fall like this.
|
387.214 | | NECSC::CRONIC::semi3.hlo.dec.com::notes | i believe in Chemo-Girl!!! | Fri Jun 07 1996 10:43 | 9 |
| probably Q4 loss??? that's the first i've heard of that...
at first i asn't too surprised about the stock coming down since
i'd heard fromothers that it was priced a little higher than it should be...
but i'm bumming now that i didn't place my order to seel it all as soon
as it was bought... it'l be back to the espp purchase price soon at this
rate...
da ve
|
387.215 | sold | AWECIM::HANNAN | Beyond description... | Fri Jun 07 1996 11:00 | 4 |
| Once again I'm real glad I sold on the 1st, same day bought...
Had no choice - needed the $ bad, and it worked out!
/Ken
|
387.216 | | RAGE::JC | Time to put a new face on life | Sun Jun 09 1996 22:48 | 4 |
| i don't think Q4 will be a loss. no way.
if it is, DEC will be back to 18 bucks/sh very
fast. so, if you expect a loss, sell today.!
|
387.217 | A dissenting viewpoint... | NAC::TRAMP::GRADY | Squash that bug! (tm) | Mon Jun 10 1996 12:40 | 28 |
| > to fail despite good products and technical advantages.
Well, we have some really good products, but we also have a lot of
stinkers that we continue to fund, develop, market and support at a
substantial loss. Considering the market and our position in it, there
are still quite a few cuts that could be made by simply getting rid of
tangential, non-mainstream products that not only don't make money, but
never have...
IMHO, we're still over-extended. We'll probably show a profit, but we
could still afford to sell or retire some products - especially software
products. We could probably unload half of our software products and
profits would jump.
We're also in the midst of a major product transition - OpenVMS is
obviously in the very early stages of end-of-life while Unix is still
gearing up. I think, in the long run, NT/Alpha is a fantasy that can't be
sustained vs. the Intel juggernaut. As a result, we have to decide how to
evolve our systems business. Our numbers are looking better, but the game
is far from over.
I'm in favor of the current product strategy - I just wish more could be
done for employee morale in the process...but given the strategy, that's
nearly impossible.
We could also do with a lot less No Output Deparment management.
tim
|
387.218 | | SMURF::connor.zk3.dec.com::strobel | | Mon Jun 10 1996 14:50 | 22 |
| I don't think we'll have a loss. To Tim's point, I agree that there's still
plenty of opportunity to thin the product line. I think we've sold all that
we can, software-wise in the sense that I don't think there's a market for
much of what's left and that we want to part with. We need to cut back to
maintenance then retire and have a good, consistent message and solution
for customers who use the products.
We've got some great products, but we continue to passively market them and
onyl on their technological merits. You listen to Sun and you'd think they
invented the internet. They didn't, but they're so aggressive in their
message that they can draw customers in spite of their limited
technological position. Sun & Microsoft do a great job at getting free
press that gets their names as those associated with hot markets regardless
of how strong they actually are in those spaces.
We still need to do better on cost side as well. The new Compaq servers are
alot cheaper than the rawhides with a much smaller difference in
performance. We need to 1) see what we can do cheaper and 2) actively
address where we have the advantage and why those advantages are important
to a customer.
jeff
|
387.219 | | NAC::TRAMP::GRADY | Squash that bug! (tm) | Mon Jun 10 1996 14:57 | 22 |
| Sun takes advantage of some pervasive networking myths:
The Internet runs on TCP/IP, which was invented on Unix (Not true)
Sun was the first commercial Unix system (Not True)
...so therefore, Sun invented the Internet (VERY Not True).
In actuality, Sun had nothing to do with the invention of TCP/IP, which
was only an afterthough on Unix, nor the creation of the Internet, nor the
commercialization of Unix. Hell, we had more to do with the
commercialization of Unix than Sun did - we sponsored the development of
System V.
What Sun did do brilliantly, as do most enormously successful
entrepreneurs from Thomas Edison to Netscape, was take advantage of other
people's inventions to create a commercial product for which there was not
only a need, there was a screaming DEMAND....
They're the anti-Xerox. ;-)
tim
|
387.220 | | RAGE::JC | You name it, I do it | Mon Jun 17 1996 21:36 | 17 |
| for the s/w persective, we're not market driven.
requirements are still being dictated by an engineer who
is pretty good at it, but not perfect. we bust our
butts to produce s/w that sits, because digital cannot
get the freakin' message out, cannot get marketing and engineering
in one room, etc. my new biz unit, the ISBU, is too busy
appointing VPs and worrying about office moves than shipping
product. case and point: last week i was nearly ready to ship
to the SSB, but, was held up /cuz we had to pack up 100+ systems
and move from TAY to LJO. i pushed a request to delay the move to
VP level and the answer was, bite the bullet and move now. so, we
take a 2-3 day hit on the sched. it was critical to submit on 12-jun
'cuz that was the last day to guarentee FCS end-of-month, but now, we
submitted 14-jun and we'll FCS 2nd or 3rd wk in july....
i just do not see a collective team effort around my area, and
as i grow older and more knowledgeable, the more frustrating it
gets.
|
387.221 | ex | JARETH::LARU | | Tue Jun 18 1996 10:53 | 9 |
| � product. case and point: last week i was nearly ready to ship
� to the SSB, but, was held up /cuz we had to pack up 100+ systems
� and move from TAY to LJO. i pushed a request to delay the move to
� VP level and the answer was, bite the bullet and move now. so, we
� take a 2-3 day hit on the sched. it was critical to submit on 12-jun
� 'cuz that was the last day to guarentee FCS end-of-month, but now, we
� submitted 14-jun and we'll FCS 2nd or 3rd wk in july....
Sounds like a case for Dilbert!
|
387.222 | embarrass somebody! | ASABET::DCLARK | SBU Technology Group | Tue Jun 18 1996 13:53 | 2 |
| Sounds like something to post in the Digital notesfile too.
That kind of crap should have vanished long ago.
|
387.223 | Stock sale for December 96? | dhcp64_77.ljo.dec.com::roberts | everything leads up to this day | Mon Dec 02 1996 14:36 | 5 |
387.224 | | DELNI::DSMITH | In a minute I'll be free | Mon Dec 02 1996 15:01 | 6 |
387.225 | too much DEC! | LJSRV2::JC | The torture of chalkdust collects on my tongue | Tue Dec 10 1996 10:23 | 5 |
387.226 | | DELNI::DSMITH | In a minute I'll be free | Wed Dec 11 1996 11:01 | 6 |
387.227 | | ICS::SMITHDE | In a minute I'll be free | Thu Feb 06 1997 14:03 | 5 |
|
Looks like I may be buyng meself one of those T.I.P.S
deals.
Very nice!
|
387.228 | | ALFA2::DWEST | i believe in chemo girl! | Thu Feb 06 1997 14:13 | 5 |
|
i must not have been paying attention... what is "one of those
T.I.P.S. deals"??? can you elaborate some?
da ve
|
387.229 | | BINKLY::CEPARSKI | May Your Song Always Be Sung | Thu Feb 06 1997 14:52 | 3 |
| >>i must not have been paying attention...
must be in the air lately
|
387.230 | just had ta say it! | EVMS::OCTOBR::DEBESS | seeking all thats stil unsung | Thu Feb 06 1997 15:18 | 3 |
|
yeah da ve, PAY ATTENTION dammit!
|
387.231 | | ALFA2::DWEST | i believe in chemo girl! | Thu Feb 06 1997 15:28 | 5 |
| thanks Debess... i was waiting for that... :^)
i'm still clueless about the T.I.P.S. thingy though...
da ve
|
387.232 | | GRANPA::TDAVIS | | Thu Feb 06 1997 15:55 | 1 |
| YES, I am also interested in the TIPS.... I must be losing it...
|
387.233 | | LJSRV2::JC | No friends on powder days | Thu Feb 06 1997 17:59 | 18 |
| Deano has been enjoying his macroeconmic too much lately!
TIPS, forget wtf is stands for, are the new inflation-protextion
bonds the feds just came out with. these are indexed to inflation
thus guarenteeing you a return that will _beat_ inflation over the
course of 10 yrs (they are 10-yr notes). i think the spread is
inflation + 3 pts. now, the big question is how to measure inflation,
which is often bouted about by diff economists largely driven
by political affiliation.
personally, at my age, i would not buy them and instead invest
a litle bit more aggresively in small company stocks (just sent 5g
to the investment doods for more SC stocks and 2x that for a
corp bond fund). but, for older folks relying on a pretty much guarenteed
hedge against the big "I" (inflation), TIPS are good.
|
387.234 | | JARETH::LARU | au contraire... | Fri Feb 07 1997 08:21 | 22 |
| re: TIPS
No investment instrument is a "sure thing" by itself. As I understand
it, the new bonds are designed to counteract some negative feature
of the old bonds... In certain economic conditions, one type provides
a better return, under different conditions the other type provides
a better return. Over any time period, the two will average out
to the "standard" bond return (which is probably close to inflation,
minus broker/handling fees). Neither type of bond by itself provides
a guarantee of beating market cycles, any investment requires
close attention and luck.
Standard investment advise is to diversify: Have a mix of investments
so that, no matter what the market conditions, at least one part
of your portfolio making money. Just as it's impossible (in a free,
non-manipulated market) to buy at the lowest, sell at the highest,
it's impossible to plan a protfolio that will always provide maximum
return.
IMO, your milage may vary.
/b
|
387.235 | | SPECXN::BARNES | | Fri Feb 07 1997 11:56 | 3 |
| well, obviously the answer is to die young and leave a good looking
corpse...(unlike the ones on the gross URL about corpse's...UGH!)
rfb
|
387.236 | | ICS::SMITHDE | In a minute I'll be free | Tue Feb 11 1997 16:15 | 3 |
|
Yes. TIPS. With the threat of inflation on it's way soon, I
would say TIPS would be a great idea.
|
387.237 | i hate taxes | LJSRV2::JC | No friends on powder days | Fri Apr 04 1997 11:12 | 21 |
| So, i got to figuring my taxes and here are the %ages i pay out to
the various governments:
% of gross income
going to the tax tax
---------------- ----
16.35% FED income tax
5.21% state (mass)
5.50% social security
1.45% medicare
2.63% real estate (to Groton)
31.15% of our incomes goes to taxes.
some other interesting facts: my total tax amount
in dollar terms is $11k more than my starting salary
at digital in 1987. we contributed 9.47% of our
income to 401k programs.
good news is we are getting a return from the feds
which will be much-needed! bad news is we owe mass
a few hundred, but at least it aint a few grand!!
|
387.238 | | SPECXN::BARNES | | Fri Apr 04 1997 11:27 | 5 |
| we get alittle back,,,very little..but Patty and I were talking about
that the other nite..Remember when a tax return was spent as "party
money", now a days it seems to go to some damn bill.
rfb
|
387.239 | sorry to burst your bubble! | BSS::DSMITH | I'LL GET UP AND FLY AWAY | Fri Apr 04 1997 11:36 | 7 |
|
Re:31.15% of our incomes goes to taxes.
Wrong JC... You still have to figure sales tax,property tax,fuel tax
and all the other taxes added in to get a true figure...
Divide
|
387.240 | | ASDG::IDE | My mind's lost in a household fog. | Fri Apr 04 1997 12:44 | 10 |
| I just got my taxes done too. It was the most difficult tax year yet:
we filed 1040, schedules A, B, C, and D; forms 2441 and 8606; and two
signed statements due to the AT&T breakup. I may need to put two
stamps on this one!
The bottom line was $220 back from the Feds and we owed the state $90.
Not bad. It's hard to believe now, but I had large capital gains from
sales of DEC stock. :-/
Jamie
|
387.241 | use a tax guy, way less headsaches | ASABET::DCLARK | think global, act loco | Fri Apr 04 1997 13:17 | 7 |
| I went to a tax guy for the first time. Saved me all the hassle.
Plus he knew a lot of tricks that I wouldn't have ever thought
of. Result: $720 back from the feds, $140 back from the state.
Like RFB said, though, this is going right out the door to pay
bills.
- Dave
|
387.242 | | UCXAXP::GRADY | Squash that bug! (tm) | Fri Apr 04 1997 19:30 | 14 |
| Could we not talk about this? I'm depressed. I usually get some back,
but this year I sold the Spaceship Grady and moved into a smaller
house, out of necessity, i.e. I needed to pay my lawyer for helping me
keep my kids, so I'm paying a big one this year....been saving up all
year...
31% isn't that bad, really. I'm usually in that ballpark. Of course,
if I had lost the custody battle, I'd be paying that plus 38% in child
support...
And living in a cardboard box.
tim
|
387.243 | late again | TEPTAE::WESTERVELT | | Wed Apr 09 1997 17:58 | 8 |
|
Is it true that if you are owed a refund, you don't have to file on time?
State & Fed?
Thanks
Tom
|
387.244 | | SPECXN::BARNES | | Wed Apr 09 1997 18:02 | 3 |
| errr, i don't think so. But you can ask for an extension, can't ya?
rfb
|
387.245 | | TEPTAE::WESTERVELT | | Wed Apr 09 1997 18:06 | 2 |
|
That requires filling out a form! Blech!
|
387.246 | | SMURF::HAPGOOD | Java Java HEY! | Wed Apr 09 1997 18:16 | 7 |
| ya, have to file on time whether owe or not...or at least have to ask
for an extension by 4/15. if you owe when you ask for an extension you
have to ay what you owe when asking for the extension (hey, how would
you know thaT??).
bob
|
387.247 | | SALEM::BENJAMIN | | Wed Apr 09 1997 22:48 | 3 |
| Not true...I just filed my 1993 tax return and I'm getting about
$500 back...if they owe you, they don't care if you file or not..
Uncle Sam will be happy to keep your money...
|
387.248 | | SMURF::HAPGOOD | Java Java HEY! | Thu Apr 10 1997 09:47 | 8 |
|
> Not true...I just filed my 1993 tax return and I'm getting about
> $500 back...if they owe you, they don't care if you file or not..
> Uncle Sam will be happy to keep your money...
So what do I know anyway :)
|
387.249 | | ICS::SMITHDE | So many roads | Thu Apr 10 1997 09:55 | 3 |
|
I filed my last years taxes (refund) in June. No penalties.
|
387.250 | the IRS can be very arbitrary... | JARETH::LARU | au contraire... | Thu Apr 10 1997 09:58 | 11 |
| also not quite true... you are *supposed to file* (at least an
extension) , whether you owe or not.
If you file the extension, they'll stay off your back
for awhile... If not, they can get pretty nasty, should they choose...
It's true, if you don't file, and then file for your refund in the
future, there is usually no hassle. I happened to catch a bit
of Charles this am (button left set from last night ;-(
the infomercial of the day was some guy pushing a set of books/tapes
of how to live tax-free... Name of FitzGerald, I think. There
is probably info on the website.
|
387.251 | extension form is pretty simple... | JARETH::LARU | au contraire... | Thu Apr 10 1997 10:01 | 7 |
| as I recall, the extension form requires only your name, address, SSN,
and the estimated amount owed/overpaid. If you owe, you are supposed
to pay the full amount estimated. If, when the final forms are filed,
you still owe more than 10% of the total tax bill, they *can* start
charging hefty penalties...
/b
|
387.252 | And 2 pro wrestlers on before that | WMOIS::LEBLANCC | All good things in all good time | Thu Apr 10 1997 10:01 | 2 |
| yeah this guy fought the IRS in federal court and hasn't paid taxes in
like 10 years
|
387.253 | | EVMS::OCTOBR::DEBESS | and the wind began to HOWL | Thu Apr 10 1997 10:51 | 3 |
|
give a check to tax deductible charity organiZAtions!
|
387.254 | they asked me for collateral, so I pulled down mu pants | QUOIN::BELKIN | but from that cup no more | Thu Apr 10 1997 11:08 | 2 |
| <----- I must say I'm enjoying Debess's DylanWeekism's very much!
|
387.255 | | EVMS::OCTOBR::DEBESS | and the wind began to HOWL | Thu Apr 10 1997 11:36 | 4 |
|
something is happenin' here and you do know what it is,
don't you Mr. Belkin!
|
387.256 | | LJSRV2::JC | No friends on powder days | Fri Apr 11 1997 00:27 | 8 |
| you are right divide, there are other taxes too which, by my
estimates, would add perhaps another 1-3% ...
btw, according to the WSJ, the avg american works 2 hrs 29 mins
each day for taxes.
|
387.257 | somebody's got to pay for all those bombs! | JARETH::LARU | au contraire... | Fri Apr 11 1997 09:28 | 6 |
| � btw, according to the WSJ, the avg american works 2 hrs 29 mins
� each day for taxes.
which is low compared to other "western" countries...
/b
|
387.258 | | SPECXN::BARNES | | Fri Apr 11 1997 11:20 | 8 |
| re;
the avg american works 2 hrs 29 minseach day for taxes.
which is why i screw off at least 3 hours a day.
%^)
rfb
|
387.259 | har! | AWECIM::HANNAN | Beyond description... | Fri Apr 11 1997 14:40 | 1 |
| Good one rfb!!! :=):-)
|
387.260 | what up | ICS::SMITHDE | So many roads | Thu Apr 17 1997 12:27 | 4 |
|
What in the world is going on with the stock today?????????????
something positive, thats fer ser.
|
387.261 | keep on growing | BINKLY::CEPARSKI | May Your Song Always Be Sung | Thu Apr 17 1997 12:45 | 4 |
| >>What in the world is going on with the stock today?????????????
Q2 profit of $51 mill announced today - seems like a pretty favorable
response to just that however.
|
387.262 | | ASABET::DCLARK | Howl! | Thu Apr 17 1997 13:32 | 6 |
| the old 'overstimate how bad things are in your press leaks' tactic,
I think. We announce .27/share when the media thought we'd be
announcing around .22/share. We're still way down from $35 just a few
weeks ago.
- Dave
|
387.263 | being positive is so much more fun!!! | ICS::SMITHDE | So many roads | Thu Apr 17 1997 15:38 | 8 |
|
>the old 'overstimate how bad things are in your press leaks'tactic,
I hear ya. I'm totally tired of the negative spew. Over and over
again I hear the negative comments about "how bad we're doing" and then
over and over again we end up above water.
Maybe this whole company needs a good dose! ;-)
|
387.264 | | LJSRV2::JC | No friends on powder days | Fri Apr 18 1997 19:20 | 15 |
| re: sick of negative stuff
well, it is hard to be positive in a dying company, i think.
take a look around... everyone else is doing ok, and digital
is suckin' wind. what happens when the recession comes? economic
times are good now, and diigtal is staying slightly afloat, what
happens when companies don't want to spend money???
palmer has got to go.
i think that is the biggest and best thing that can
happen to digital right now.
our stock sucks.
look at microsoft... up 9 bucks today, 33% of our stock price
in a single day.
so, get out now!
|
387.265 | | LJSRV2::JC | No friends on powder days | Fri Apr 18 1997 19:22 | 7 |
| btw, being part of altavista, you would not believe
the difference... everyone is so psyched to LEAVE digital
and become our own place, without the management
problems and baggage digital has... it is nice to
be able to hang out w/ the vps and feel comfortable, tell
them what's on your minds, etc... what a diff. vs. digital.
|
387.266 | | HELIX::CLARK | | Fri Apr 18 1997 19:49 | 17 |
| > well, it is hard to be positive in a dying company, i think.
> take a look around... everyone else is doing ok, and digital
> is suckin' wind.
This is the way I felt until very recently.
3 or 4 recent developments have made me feel more optimistic (Claflin,
"continuous computing" reconsidered as core competency [theoretically] to
be applied to 6 of 9 areas (including VMS as high end for NT), high-p
computing becomes 1 of the 9, consolidation of sales/marketing).
These changes are way overdue, it may be too late...
And/or DEC may not have the "vision & courage" to follow through.
Maybe I'm feeling only a temporary lift because it feels like the
corporate IQ went up a few notches.
A few more notches and we may learn to market... - JayC.
|
387.267 | | LJSRV2::JC | No friends on powder days | Sat Apr 19 1997 00:35 | 10 |
| maybe it has come up a few notches, but man digital has a lot
to learn about management and running a business. ..there is
this thing around altavista, "think and act like a startup" yet
it is so hypocritcal because nothing is *that* different here.
lots and lots of inexperience: no real focus, politics, business
as usual. let someone who has a growth agenda and experience to back
it up take the wheel for a while.....
sorry to be down folks, but that's da facts, like'em or not.
IMO.
|
387.268 | | UCXAXP::GRADY | Squash that bug! (tm) | Sat Apr 19 1997 16:39 | 3 |
| I agree. No one is willing to take a risk anymore. Everyone wants to
play it safe, and that is pure politics...
|
387.269 | | GRANPA::TDAVIS | | Mon Apr 21 1997 11:05 | 7 |
| Growth is now our top priority, we still maintain a strong balance
sheet, and have mucho cash $2.3B. Without this we would have been
gone years ago. It will be easy to see if Bruce is successful
or not, 2-3 quarters will show. At the very least we are squeaking
out a profit. I do get ill when I see what other companys make
in profits, and look at our stock price... I am in it for the
long haul.
|
387.270 | soap boxing | SMURF::connor.zk3.dec.com::hotpup::strobel | jeff strobel | Mon Apr 21 1997 16:05 | 37 |
| Unfortunately I agree with JC (I don't have any problem agreeing with JC,
just wish it wasn't on such a negative issue). We have never learned that
good marketing beats good technology. We know we have great products --
Alpha, 64 bit UNIX and OpenVMS, NT on Alpha, interoperability between the
3, clustering, the Alta Vista technologies, etc. Unfortunately we spend
alot of time telling ourselves this without EVER effectively communicating
these to the market.
Take Digital v. HP. Sometime around the year 2000 they're going to have to
ship UNIX versions in 32 bit (HP-UX) and 64 bit (Merced, for the FIRST
time) and have all if not more of the application
migration/recompile/rewrite/etc. problems we had years ago coupled with the
Year 2000 issues and trying to put in interoperability with NT that they
just announced, which will also be 64 bit for the first time in that same
period. Meanwhile, we have 64 bit UNIX with 64 bit apps, we have
interoperability between UNIX/NT/VMS. One would think we'd be aggressively
YELLING this at every opportunity. The only reference I've seen of it is on
Sun's homepage.
To me the 1-3-9 is not marketing, it's trying to define those areas where
we feel we can be a leader based on our product and service offerings. What
is needed is to create a perception. People feel they should use Microsoft
products (even though there may be better ones out there). Sun and Compaq
do phenominal jobs articulating simple messages. Heck, Dell's a $7b
company and they've just entered the server market.
If our NT business and our UNIX business are not growing as fast at their
respective markets, then it seems clear to me we need to do a better job
determining into what sales situations we should lead with what solution
and our marketing needs to effectively and consistently back this up.
As far as profitability, I'd contend much of it was due to the 5600 fewer
people. We've done a fine job reigning in costs but if we're not going to
aggressively try to grow the business we'll continue to have problems.
jeff
|
387.271 | | GRANPA::TDAVIS | | Tue Apr 22 1997 10:27 | 2 |
| Jeff, do you think it is hopeless? Will we ever come out of this?
Will "good" marketing do it?
|
387.272 | today's rant, sponsored by Irish Spring | SMURF::connor.zk3.dec.com::hotpup::strobel | jeff strobel | Tue Apr 22 1997 15:36 | 30 |
| I wouldn't say it's hopeless quite yet but the longer we passively sit
around with the "field of dreams" mentality (if we build it, they will
come) the faster we'll seal our own fate. We need to combine clear,
aggressive and consistent (i.e., stop changing our story every 3-6
months) marketing with focused selling. What I mean by the latter (it's
be a while since I was a salesperson) is picking our battles, giving the
sales and sales support people the knowledge and help to make the sale
and following up with any and all leads. It seems to me, perhaps I'm
naive, that for the next 12 to 24 months at least before 64 bit NT, that
we could define preferred offerings of hardware & operating system for
general categories, at least to lead with. For example, Telco & large
ISP's -- Digital UNIX & Alpha, VMS installed base , some 24x7
situations -- VMS on Alpha, high end desktop UNIX, low to mid desktop NT
on Intel & Alpha, low to mid servers NT on Intel or Alpha or UNIX
(depending on the supported underlying applications). Do customers still
do rfq's where they specify what they want?
I also think we need to be brash, which I know has never been Digital's
nature. We should boldly state plans such as "we are going to be THE
systems provider for ISP's, or Telco's or banks..." It'll probably tick
off the Sun's & HP's but it might send a message to customers that we
don't plan on dying off but will fight for their business.
Conversely, if we reorg the field a few more times, don't do anything
about the flood levels of engineering attrition and fail to be
aggressive in standing up for ourselves, we'll slowly die off selling to
and increasingly smaller installed base.
jeff
|
387.273 | | ALFA1::DWEST | i believe in chemo girl! | Tue Apr 22 1997 17:28 | 1 |
| rantly yes... but i liked it too.... :^)
|
387.274 | | GRANPA::TDAVIS | | Tue Apr 22 1997 22:30 | 3 |
|
good rant... I think there is a Business Week article that
agree with you also.
|
387.275 | | ICS::SMITHDE | So many roads | Wed Apr 23 1997 10:03 | 17 |
|
I think Digital can rage up a storm if everyone puts on a positive
mindset. That combined with the right tools, the right mgmt, and the
right structure, we can rip the marketplace apart.
It would be nice if we had an operating system that utilized 64 bit
(besides PU-nix...) to it's limits. But hey, we're only supplying the
fastest processor in the world....No big deal. NOT!!!!!!
I think there's some real shitty mgmt out there that doesn't know a
good resource if it were to fall on top of them. Big problem with this
company...IMO.
But hey, we can still rage. Take a look at the stock. It's going up.
If you don't believe in Digital, then for Gods sake, get a job
somewhere you do believe in.
|
387.276 | | SSDEVO::R_BARNES | | Wed Apr 23 1997 12:02 | 11 |
| re: last
ya right....
re:get a job...
I did,
you must have taken some DEC touchy feely classes lately Dean-o...%^)
rfb_used to like DEC, no love lost over Digital
|
387.277 | RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE! (please) | WMOIS::LEBLANCC | All good things in all good time | Wed Apr 23 1997 12:23 | 1 |
| a kinder and gentler deane
|
387.278 | | SMURF::HAPGOOD | Java Java HEY! | Wed Apr 23 1997 12:31 | 16 |
| <<< Note 387.275 by ICS::SMITHDE "So many roads" >>>
> I think Digital can rage up a storm if everyone puts on a positive
.
.
.
> It would be nice if we had an operating system that utilized 64 bit
> (besides PU-nix...) to it's limits. But hey, we're only supplying the
Are you in line for a management job? Perhaps politics?
Talk about saying 2 different things in 2 sentences.
:)
|
387.279 | | LJSRV2::JC | No friends on powder days | Wed Apr 23 1997 13:42 | 28 |
| I think digital has a very very tough road ahead of itself.
attrition is NOT abating.
ever try to hire a software engineer ?
ever get one in the door to interview??
let me tell you, it is tough.
contractors, typically not much of a problem.
full-timers? forget it.
who wants to work for a loser?
and i agree with jeff totally: our marketing program sucks.
look at microsoft. the difference is microsoft **creates** markets
while digital tries to figure out how to spell "marketing". that is
the big reason why MS is so freaking successful... they are excellent
at creating mkts (remember NT 4 years ago? i doubt you would because
it wasn't a product at that time, but now, it is a HUGE revenue
base for MS, and climbing steadily, past UNIX, past the rest... an
excellent example of a market created... remember, NT was NOTHING 4
years ago... go ask your buddies what VMS is then ask them what NT
is... most people will say "Huh?" to VMS and "oh, yeah, that's microsoft's
OS" to NT.). marketing, perception, success.
my own take is Palmer has got to hit the road.
all of those B.O.D. members that have been there since the first
days have to retire and hit the road.... business times have changes
and the B.O.D. has stayed in the old 60s, 70s mindset...
|
387.280 | positive attitude | ICS::SMITHDE | So many roads | Wed Apr 23 1997 13:44 | 16 |
|
re - Bob
I don't see the difference or the likeness between the 2 statements?
re - onward
As for a good attitide. Now I work in a department where I am
respected, treated well, *and* *listened* *to*. What a difference!!!!!
furthermore...
All day I'm resolving issues with people who are selling our products.
If I had a poor attitude, it would probably rub off to people we need
to be very positive about Digital. The people that call and give me
the garbage probably aren't selling garbage.
|
387.281 | | LJSRV2::JC | No friends on powder days | Wed Apr 23 1997 13:55 | 26 |
| re: psoitve thinking
deano mentions positive thinking... this is yet another big
problem which i would characterize more as morale. morale is
in the dumper! ever see palmer roaming the halls, eating w/ the
troops? ever see any VPs mingling with us low-lifes (ok, i'll speak
for my self here :-) ? nope.
i was jus telling my mgr... i can work 60 hrs a week and get something
in on time or i can work 40 hrs and get something in late. the
same result occurs: I make my same salary. zero incentive for me
to jam many hours other than the prospect of getting 7% insterad of
3% raise. really folks, the 4% diff ain't much these days when taxes
are worked into the picture.
lets get some incentives in place.
stock options, bonuses, etc.
and some ACCOUNTABILITY !!
those mgrs running losing businesses need to be held accountable and
those mgrs running projecxts that are successfull need to be rewarded
along with their teams for their success....
we're just releasing the next version of tunnels today
(*ahhh!)
next cycle, i'm goign to ask for incentives, and i'll be
dissappointed if they decline. incentives offered to a team
will do a lot for the productivity of everyone, i think.,.. at
least that is what i've learned in b-school, and by talking
with people here, it seems to be something that would motivate
my team to pull together even more.
|
387.282 | | QUARRY::petert | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Wed Apr 23 1997 13:58 | 11 |
| > re - Bob
>
> I don't see the difference or the likeness between the 2 statements?
Well, Deano, just what is your attitude towards Unix? Mentioning it
as PU-nix seems to give the impression that you don't think too highly
of it. Of course this may be your attitude towards Unix in general
and not Digital Unix in particular, which is still the only 64bit
Unix in the market.
PeterT
|
387.283 | we need a new operating system | ICS::SMITHDE | So many roads | Wed Apr 23 1997 15:19 | 9 |
|
Right, I despise Unix. I wasted more time learning a system that
continues to be more and more cryptical as I attempt to understand it
more and more.
I hope that MS produces an NT product that harnesses the 64 bit
capability to it's fullest extent.
Digital did not produce Unix.
|
387.284 | Fair enough, deano | QUARRY::petert | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Wed Apr 23 1997 17:09 | 12 |
| Well, we may not have invented unix, but the first unix was developed
on a Digital machine, so the association goes way back. Sure, it's not
the OS for the common man, but it gets the job done, does it better than
some others, and it exists on more platforms than any other OS.
It generates money for Digital, so please don't denigrate it to our
customers. Not that I think you would, of course. It pays my salary,
certainly. I haven't really had the opportunity to play around with
NT, so I can't comment on it, but for my personal tastes, I'd rather
have a unix box than anything else. Now if they only did a Real Audio
port... (available for Linux on Alpha's but not for DU, sigh....)
PeterT
|
387.285 | | HELIX::CLARK | | Wed Apr 23 1997 18:22 | 11 |
| > ever try to hire a software engineer ?
Actually there's a positive experience to report... OEM/realtime was
placing an ad for h/w and s/w positions, and actually debated whether to
prominently say DIGITAL. (Negative image, etc.)
They went ahead and labelled it DIGITAL and there was a flood of
responses.
That being said, I have no idea what it's like elsewhere in the company.
Might not have been a typical ad in various respects. - JayC.
|
387.286 | | AWECIM::HANNAN | | Thu Apr 24 1997 09:37 | 11 |
| re: <<< Note 387.283 by ICS::SMITHDE "So many roads" >>>
> Right, I despise Unix. I wasted more time learning a system that
> continues to be more and more cryptical as I attempt to understand it
> more and more.
Alright Deano! I wholeheartedly agree with you about unix.
Been saying the same thing for years. I dislike it because
it's so damned crypticm, *intentionally* cryptic even.
/Ken
|
387.287 | | SMURF::HAPGOOD | Java Java HEY! | Thu Apr 24 1997 09:48 | 15 |
| Ok, I see where you all are coming from. But I'll attempt to tie this
back to Deano's comments re: if all were positive about DEC then good
things can happen (I usually don't talk work in this file).
Anyhow, I took exception because you all may not like UNIX but who cares
whether *you* like UNIX or not? We should sell it for what it's worth until
NT can carry the high end. We should have done the same for VMS as well.
Until we do that we'll continue to let SUN and HP sell UNIX and beat us
in the market for time to come.
just a comment from
bob
|
387.288 | | ALFA1::DWEST | i believe in chemo girl! | Thu Apr 24 1997 10:38 | 40 |
| JC, dude... things aren't quite the same all over... i routinely
run into "VP types" in the halls... it's not the least bit unusual
for them (uh, 4 different VPs) to tell me "good morning" *and* refer
to me by my first name... and trust me when i tell you, there aren't
too many "lower lifes" than i...
and in general...
as for all the comments abou marketing and sales stuff, i agree with
Jeffs note too... consistant marketing and focussed selling efforts
are important and this is a lesson being learned all over the
company... it would be stooopid to argue that DIGITAL was ever a
marketing power... :^) but it's equally as silly to say that we can't
market at all... there are a lot of folks working hard to make things
happen as far as programs for the field and such... i know, it's in
front of me every day... "DIGITAL can't market it's way out of a wet
paper bag" is a mantra of sorts in some corners... problem is, a lot
of these people don't even know what marketing is, other than pink
battery operated bunnies, sexy women drooling over beer swilling men,
or, to stick with our industry, break dancin' clean room employees...
the answer is more complicated than firing Bob Palmer and making tv
ads... some of us would do well to remember that Bob may well have
saved the company, difficult as it has been... we were losing what,
$4 MILLION *per day* when he took over??? change is traumatic, and
institutional change is going to affect a lot of people... the man
made some tough calls and pissed off a lot of folks but we're still here...
now, most of you know me pretty well and i'm not the biggest fan of
DIGITAL and what we've become... so this is not just rah-rah crap...
sure, things were a lot better years ago... but this aint then...
everythings different now... Deane's got a popint abou postive
attitudes... we're our own wort critics but we're not the only ones
listening... how many times has a pissed off employee gotten published
in the globe with stuff that turns out to be mostly sour grapes? the
whining time is over... it's become an incredibly tedious pattern...
i wish as a company we could just "get over it and get a life"...
da ve
|
387.289 | | GRANPA::TDAVIS | | Thu Apr 24 1997 11:15 | 10 |
| I agree, we need to get on with it, as a "field " type person
I have seen our brightest, and best reps leave this company
due to compensation issues (not getting commission paid on time),
too many account changes, and having to apply for their jobs
all of this within the past fiscal year.
I am also hearing that the newest reorg (happening right now in
Cambridge) is the last chance to get it right, or.....
Should be a fun FY98.
|
387.290 | | LJSRV2::JC | No friends on powder days | Thu Apr 24 1997 11:25 | 14 |
| re: the UNIX comments
there is a guy in my office here who is a big Win 95 fan.
i always say "95 sucks, NT rules". technically, this is a true
statement 'cuz 95 just does not handle heavy load as much as NT
does; you start trying to get 95 to do 10 apps at once, and it
has a very hard time, whereas NT tends to perform a whole lot
better. but, this guy always calls my attention to the installed base.
40M 95 installs, 1.5M NT installs or so. it may suck, but it has
a huge mkt share.
UNIX may suck, but it too has a big mkt share.
You ain't gonna make any money doing VMS these days.
|
387.291 | | LJSRV2::JC | No friends on powder days | Thu Apr 24 1997 11:32 | 39 |
| <<< Note 387.288 by ALFA1::DWEST "i believe in chemo girl!" >>>
> JC, dude... things aren't quite the same all over... i routinely
> run into "VP types" in the halls... it's not the least bit unusual
> for them (uh, 4 different VPs) to tell me "good morning" *and* refer
> to me by my first name... and trust me when i tell you, there aren't
> too many "lower lifes" than i...
well, that is good to hear.
I wonder how many other people in here are referred to by name
by their VP...
> the answer is more complicated than firing Bob Palmer and making tv
> ads... some of us would do well to remember that Bob may well have
> saved the company, difficult as it has been... we were losing what,
> $4 MILLION *per day* when he took over??? change is traumatic, and
> institutional change is going to affect a lot of people... the man
> made some tough calls and pissed off a lot of folks but we're still here...
when BP took over, HP was having trouble too.
We were neck-and-neck w/ HP for the #2 computer company in the world
in temrs of revenue....
Today, HP has revenues over $20 B.
We have actually LOST revenue year-over-year to what, $12.5B /yr?
HPs stock is up, has split (i believe), where as our stock is still below 30.
No shareholder value at digital.
The difference is HP had a growth plan, BP did not.
yeah, cutting had to be done, but the answer to all of
digital's woes is not to cut,cut,cut until you have nothing left.
BP *still* doesn't have a growth plan.
wall st. doesn't invest in companies who's strategy is to cut to
attain profitability.
wall st. invests in companies like HP, Intel, MFST, etc that continues
to deomontrate GROWTH.
that is my biggest beef with Palmer.
NO GROWTH PLAN !
NO growth plan = no shareholder value = low share price.
|
387.292 | stock needs to rise more | ICS::SMITHDE | So many roads | Thu Apr 24 1997 11:52 | 12 |
|
I make a point of hyping out our products to friends, relatives,
neighbors etc. We really do have some good products (be it their
running Unix or not ;-). I have to admit..most the young folk over
at school are strictly NT so it's rubbed off on me.
Like I said before, I'm on the front lines now. I can't be complaining
about much to these folks besides this gray weather. :-)
fwiw: Word is out that our stock has been rising. Got several calls
last night from friends.
|
387.293 | | SMURF::connor.zk3.dec.com::hotpup::strobel | jeff strobel | Thu Apr 24 1997 12:43 | 12 |
| Stock's up mostly due to the pull of IBM's announced earnings (heck,
they're up 10 pts today.
Instead of getting into the Operating System wars, which seem to haunt
this company like a bad rash, we should decide what situations we want
to push each of the 3 (there's still some good coin to be made with VMS
and the $100k server market for UNIX grew over 100% last year) and
consistently apply our decisions. 64 bit NT won't be out for at least 2
years. I like NT but if we forego UNIX sales of big systems to basically
wait we won't have a company to worry about selling 64 bit NT.
jeff
|