[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference nac::dna

Title:	Digital Network Architecture

Moderator:	ORAN::ORAN

Created:	Tue Jun 17 1986
Last Modified:	Fri May 10 1996
Last Successful Update:	Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:	298
Total number of notes:	1727

17.0. "traffic priorities, accounting" by ROM01::CIPOLLA () Wed Jul 09 1986 13:42

T.R	Title	User	Personal Name	Date	Lines
17.1	Warning - Flame below	ORAN::ORAN	What's my Name?	`Wed Jul 09 1986 15:01`	76
17.2		SMAUG::THOMPSON		`Wed Jul 09 1986 17:05`	16
17.3		OLORIN::PERLMAN		`Wed Jul 09 1986 17:34`	14
17.4	Just a question. . .	NSSG::SULLIVAN	Steven E. Sullivan	`Wed Jul 09 1986 20:02`	32
17.5	Yes, it looks at queue lengths	OLORIN::SYLOR	Network Magic	`Wed Jul 09 1986 20:23`	8
17.6	Back to the original point.	OLORIN::SYLOR	Network Magic	`Wed Jul 09 1986 20:31`	13
17.7		NSSG::SULLIVAN	Steven E. Sullivan	`Wed Jul 09 1986 22:22`	33
17.8	Setting an expectation	STAR::MEREWOOD	Richard, ZKO1-1/D42, DTN 381-1429	`Thu Jul 10 1986 10:03`	19
17.9	WAIT A MINUTE!	FSTVAX::OVIATT	Steve Oviatt	`Thu Jul 10 1986 10:12`	11
17.10	well yes, we have two separate networks already	DELNI::GOLDSTEIN	Distributed Systems Ideology	`Thu Jul 10 1986 10:34`	15
17.11		SMAUG::THOMPSON		`Thu Jul 10 1986 10:55`	13
17.12		MU::PORTER	dave porter	`Thu Jul 10 1986 11:58`	11
17.13	Let's extend this analogy	STAR::MEREWOOD	Richard, ZKO1-1/D42, DTN 381-1429	`Thu Jul 10 1986 12:12`	23
17.14	Admitting the camel's nose	STAR::BECK	Paul Beck	`Thu Jul 10 1986 12:32`	23
17.15		MARVIN::HARPER		`Thu Jul 10 1986 13:24`	20
17.16	not two networks, just short resp time!	ROM03::CIPOLLA		`Thu Jul 10 1986 14:15`	26
17.17	Only dangerous if we were to actually DO it	STAR::BECK	Paul Beck	`Thu Jul 10 1986 14:18`	23
17.18		WKRP::KIER	Mike DTN 432-6286 @CYO	`Thu Jul 10 1986 14:32`	24
17.19	Initial assumption not proved.	STAR::MEREWOOD	Richard, ZKO1-1/D42, DTN 381-1429	`Thu Jul 10 1986 17:05`	17
17.20		SMAUG::THOMPSON		`Thu Jul 10 1986 19:42`	7
17.21	Use Servers?	SANFAN::JENNINGDO		`Thu Jul 10 1986 20:55`	19
17.22	don't use OSI as an excuse	KIRK::KYZIVAT	Paul Kyzivat	`Fri Jul 11 1986 09:49`	13
17.23	workaround?	ROM03::CIPOLLA		`Fri Jul 11 1986 12:28`	47
17.24	Transmission costs FAR more than computation	DELNI::GOLDSTEIN	Distributed Systems Ideology	`Fri Jul 11 1986 12:52`	20
17.25	We're Doing our Best	DSSDEV::SAUTER	John Sauter	`Fri Jul 11 1986 15:19`	36
17.26	is it a real problem?	KONING::KONING	Paul Koning	`Fri Jul 11 1986 16:25`	15
17.27		MU::PORTER	dave porter	`Fri Jul 11 1986 16:36`	7
17.28	Are priorities policies that are best managed in the end nodes	STAR::MANN		`Fri Jul 11 1986 18:38`	20
17.29		MARVIN::HARPER		`Sat Jul 12 1986 07:23`	9
17.30	What is the scope of a proposed priority scheme ?	STAR::MANN		`Sat Jul 12 1986 22:41`	19
17.31	Win or lose?	ENGGSG::GROLLMAN	GSG Systems Engineering	`Sun Jul 13 1986 22:25`	22
17.32		KONING::KONING	Paul Koning	`Mon Jul 14 1986 13:35`	22
17.33	Envy and Jealousy	COVERT::COVERT	John Covert	`Mon Jul 14 1986 13:48`	14
17.34	priorities = best use of limited resource?	BIOSYS::WALLACE		`Tue Jul 15 1986 14:16`	19
17.35	CPU /= network	DSSDEV::SAUTER	John Sauter	`Tue Jul 15 1986 15:19`	9
17.36	CPU .eq. line ????	BIOSYS::WALLACE		`Wed Jul 16 1986 06:03`	14
17.37		PASTIS::MONAHAN		`Wed Jul 16 1986 06:11`	2
17.38	priorities = no longer relevant	KONING::KONING	Paul Koning	`Thu Jul 17 1986 11:32`	23
17.39	congestion control is not the reason...	ERLANG::CHIU		`Fri Jul 18 1986 12:16`	21
17.40	more work needed	KONING::KONING	Paul Koning	`Fri Jul 18 1986 13:21`	12
17.41	Back to the problem presented	HITECH::BLOTCKY		`Fri Jul 18 1986 17:53`	38
17.42	Local solution possible?	KIRK::TRAGESER	Charlie Trageser	`Fri Jul 18 1986 17:59`	16
17.43	messages of l-link?	KRELL::BHARRIS	NAC Prod Mgt; Reading	`Mon Jul 21 1986 06:03`	6
17.44		COVERT::COVERT	John Covert	`Mon Jul 21 1986 08:57`	4
17.45	types of traffic, limitations	ROM03::CIPOLLA		`Mon Jul 21 1986 09:41`	52
17.46	low tech solution	KIRK::KYZIVAT	Paul Kyzivat	`Mon Jul 21 1986 14:25`	4
17.47	Links or messages	KRELL::BHARRIS	NAC Prod Mgt; Reading	`Tue Jul 22 1986 04:28`	10
17.48	(a side topic. continue elsewhere if important)	PASTIS::MONAHAN		`Tue Jul 22 1986 05:31`	15
17.49		SIVA::KONING	Paul Koning	`Tue Jul 22 1986 20:54`	7
17.50	justifying the need for priority	ERLANG::CHIU		`Wed Jul 23 1986 15:30`	14
17.51	Is some traffic more equal ?	BISTRO::WLODEK		`Thu Jul 24 1986 05:11`	17
17.52		MARVIN::HARPER		`Sat Aug 02 1986 18:57`	15
17.53	Don't ignore low speed connections!	NSSG::SULLIVAN	Steven E. Sullivan	`Mon Aug 04 1986 10:51`	18
17.54	Naive thought - sell them another Box?	AYOV14::ASCOTT	Alan Scott, FMIC, Ayr, Scotland	`Thu Aug 07 1986 06:27`	41
17.55	special box not sufficient	DSSDEV::SAUTER	John Sauter	`Thu Aug 07 1986 08:16`	19
17.56	feh	KONING::KONING	Paul Koning	`Thu Aug 07 1986 23:21`	15
17.57	Feh fi fo fum, smell the blood of a finance man	AYOV14::ASCOTT	Alan Scott, FMIC, Ayr, Scotland	`Fri Aug 08 1986 08:01`	67
17.58		KONING::KONING	Paul Koning	`Fri Aug 08 1986 18:39`	9
17.59	Big customers are asking for it	PANIC::JASPER	Alan Jasper, London	`Tue Sep 16 1986 11:48`	27
17.60	Not quite what I said	MARVIN::MILES		`Thu Sep 18 1986 14:51`	20
17.61	IBM has it NOW!	ROM01::CIPOLLA	Bruno Cipolla swas ROME	`Mon Dec 01 1986 11:36`	15
17.62	all the more reason!	KONING::KONING	Paul Koning	`Mon Dec 01 1986 18:33`	9
17.63	Don't knock the competition, they may be smarter than we think...	MARVIN::HARPER		`Mon Dec 01 1986 18:42`	26
17.64		BISTRO::WLODEK	protocol victim	`Mon Dec 21 1987 11:38`	96
17.65		KONING::KONING	NI1D @ FN42eq	`Mon Dec 21 1987 17:53`	8
17.66		BISTRO::WLODEK	protocol victim	`Wed Dec 23 1987 06:12`	22
17.67	Nit alert	STAR::BECK	Paul Beck	`Wed Dec 23 1987 20:50`	11
17.68		BISTRO::WLODEK	protocol victim	`Thu Dec 24 1987 04:16`	14
17.69	a yes vote	RTOEU::PBEAUDOIN		`Mon Jun 06 1988 13:54`	18
17.70	Traffic classes, not priorities ?	STAR::MANN		`Thu Jun 09 1988 13:50`	127
17.71	traffic classes vs. priority	ROSEN::ROSEN		`Fri Jun 10 1988 16:49`	145
17.72		STAR::MANN		`Fri Jun 10 1988 20:41`	28
17.73	Random Ramblings on the subject...	ORAN::ORAN	What's my Name?	`Sat Jun 11 1988 10:49`	36
17.74	some more comments	CHIU::CHIU	Dah-Ming Chiu, Distributed Systems Architecture	`Mon Jun 13 1988 12:03`	26
17.75	Keep it in routing	TOOK::MICHAUD	Jeff Michaud, DECnet-ULTRIX	`Mon Jun 13 1988 23:46`	22
17.76		CHIU::CHIU	Dah-Ming Chiu, Distributed Systems Architecture	`Wed Jun 15 1988 11:11`	20
17.77		OSI::HARPER		`Thu Jun 16 1988 10:16`	72
17.78	Classes are more general than priorities	LASSIE::PETTENGILL	mulp	`Mon Jun 27 1988 21:50`	27
17.79		VIDEO::LEICHTERJ	Jerry Leichter	`Sun Jul 03 1988 14:53`	53
17.80	Classes ? DEC (almost) has it now !	BISTRO::WLODEK	W.Stankiewicz, Comms support, VBO	`Mon Jul 11 1988 14:06`	102
17.81	Customer want it - we don't have it	ENUF::GASSMAN		`Tue Jul 12 1988 10:54`	16
17.82	but Mom, everybody is doing it...	LINSEY::OBRIEN		`Tue Jul 12 1988 18:38`	26
17.83	The simpler the better.	STAR::MANN		`Tue Jul 12 1988 22:23`	11
17.84		ROSEN::ROSEN		`Wed Jul 13 1988 10:37`	111
17.85	Unity is only an abstraction.	STAR::MANN		`Wed Jul 20 1988 18:00`	21
17.86	LANs aren't dedicated function nets	ROSEN::ROSEN		`Thu Jul 21 1988 17:19`	21
17.87	a thought?	PH4VAX::MCBRIDE	do it, ship 100,000, try it, fix it!	`Thu Aug 04 1988 12:27`	15
17.88	Vitalink enhances "class of service" priorities.	STAR::MANN		`Tue Sep 27 1988 18:40`	93
17.89	not every net is an Xlan.	ROM01::CIPOLLA	Bruno Cipolla DigItaly Rome	`Wed Oct 12 1988 17:48`	47
17.90		BISTRO::WLODEK	W.Stankiewicz, Comms support, VBO	`Thu Oct 13 1988 05:48`	7
17.91	Huh? This doesn't sound like adaptive ROUTING	ORAN::ORAN	Dave Oran	`Fri Oct 21 1988 16:34`	15
17.92		OSI::VARUGHESE		`Thu Nov 03 1988 06:55`	41
17.93	Understand 3 out of 4 ...	STAR::MANN		`Tue Nov 08 1988 19:00`	11
17.94		VMSNET::WOODBURY	Atlanta Networks/VMS Support	`Wed Nov 09 1988 09:25`	5
17.95	Reply to .93	OSI::VARUGHESE		`Thu Nov 10 1988 08:31`	16
17.96		VMSNET::WOODBURY	Atlanta Networks/VMS Support	`Thu Nov 10 1988 10:58`	63
17.97	IBM knows it now.	ROM01::CIPOLLA	DEC's margin on an IBM sale is zero!	`Tue Jun 13 1989 14:54`	10
17.98	leave the job to the x.25 network?	ROM01::CIPOLLA	DEC's margin on an IBM sale is zero!	`Sun Nov 26 1989 06:29`	37
17.99	priorities at work	BISTRO::WLODEK	Network pathologist.	`Thu Apr 12 1990 12:01`	37
17.100	vs. what?	RANGER::PRAETORIUS	PCI: Toonces got us here	`Fri Apr 13 1990 12:28`	5
17.101	15244244 lira, 152442445 lira, 15244246 lira...	BISTRO::WLODEK	Network pathologist.	`Tue Apr 17 1990 04:32`	108
17.102	Cisco has it too... (multiprotocol)	ROM01::CIPOLLA	DEC is a European Company	`Tue Oct 02 1990 15:04`	57
17.103	hints...	ROM01::CIPOLLA	DEC is a European Company	`Tue Oct 02 1990 15:06`	2
17.104	cisco's design is brain damaged	CVG::PETTENGILL	mulp	`Thu Oct 04 1990 21:37`	17
17.105		SUBWAY::BRIGGS	Have datascope, will travel.	`Thu Oct 11 1990 22:44`	20
17.106	IBM's way of ensuring bandwidth	SMAUG::FLOWERS	IBM Interconnect Eng. 226-7716	`Fri Oct 12 1990 09:19`	13
17.107	Looking for accounting requirements!	SHIRE::PETER	Peter Muller, European Telecommunications	`Fri Oct 04 1991 06:15`	12