Title: | SABLE SYSTEM PUBLIC DISCUSSION |
Moderator: | COSMIC::PETERSON |
Created: | Mon Jan 11 1993 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2614 |
Total number of notes: | 10244 |
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1302.1 | WELCLU::CRIDDLE | Graham Criddle, BT Tech Consultant, 7847-5524 | Tue May 30 1995 11:44 | 17 | |
1302.2 | disable or pull the 2nd cpu on the 2100 | HOSER::CARLSON | Dave | Tue May 30 1995 15:24 | 7 |
1302.3 | maybe same thing as in 1039 ? | NAMIX::jpt | FIS and Chips | Tue May 30 1995 18:07 | 7 |
1302.4 | i/o itself is multithreaded | NAMIX::jpt | FIS and Chips | Tue May 30 1995 18:11 | 11 |
1302.5 | EV5 behaves same way...if your problem is like ours?! | NAMIX::jpt | FIS and Chips | Tue May 30 1995 18:29 | 6 |
1302.6 | WELCLU::CRIDDLE | Graham Criddle, BT Tech Consultant, 7847-5524 | Wed May 31 1995 05:33 | 9 | |
1302.7 | KZPAA limits. | PERFOM::SHAKSHOBER | Wed May 31 1995 22:47 | 12 | |
1302.8 | I agree that KZPAA (and embedded SCSI) behave "not too good", but... | NAMIX::jpt | FIS and Chips | Thu Jun 01 1995 02:44 | 25 |