[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | Optical Products |
|
Moderator: | TAPE::SENEKER |
|
Created: | Wed May 04 1988 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 841 |
Total number of notes: | 3218 |
769.0. "RW500 and OpenVMS V6.x or later ???" by FIREBL::LEEDS (From VAXinated to Alphaholic) Mon Feb 03 1997 13:27
Got the attached from a customer. Any suggestions ??
Regards,
Arlan
Our story thus far:
I have a DEC RW 500 optical disk jukebox in my office. The optical
drive inside has the annoying habit of reporting itself as a SCSI
device type "OPT" (for optical) instead of "DIR" (for direct-access).
This makes the standard SCSI disk driver, which is looking for "DIR"
type devices, reluctant to talk to the optical drive.
Under OpenVMS VAX, this drive worked just fine under VMS 6.0; I was able to
use the jukebox by commanding the robot with my own software and using
VMS to read/write the optical drive via the standard SCSI driver.
Under VMS 6.2, this failed. All operations to the optical drive
failed with the most popular error being "medium is offline". My
information from DEC telephone support is that this was deliberate;
the VMS SCSI driver was made to become a real stickler about the SCSI-2
standard. The SCSI disk driver recognized the device, but would not
talk to it.
Under VMS 7.0, the situation degraded even further, to the point that
the SCSI disk driver failed to recognize that the drive even existed.
So the upshot is that, by the simple act of upgrading VMS, DEC's own
peripheral stopped working, and furthermore, that DEC broke it on pur-
pose, albeit indirectly.
Now I know that DEC has some snazzy jukebox management software that
will turn the jukebox into a single humongous file system and use the
robot to bake bread when it isn't busy changing disks and all kinds of
other fancy stuff. I don't need it, and I don't want it. I just want
for the SCSI disk driver should talk to the optical disk.
Fortunately for me, personally, Ultrix handles this quite nicely.
Through scu, you can *tell* Ultrix to pretend that the SCSI drive
which reported itself as type "OPT" is really type "DIR". The bog-
standard SCSI disk driver is then more than happy to talk to the
drive, and the jukebox works just fine under Ultrix.
This same procedure almost works under OSF/1; misfortunately, scu
gives some utterly irrelevant error message and refuses to change
its idea about the drive type.
But that's another story; my primary concern is about VMS. I'd
*really* like to get a VMS SCSI disk driver for VMS 6.2 and 7.0
(and *beyond*) that will talk to the optical disk drive in the
same way that VMS 6.0 did.
Anything you might be able to do would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
769.1 | Try 7.1 | EVMS::EVERHART | | Mon Feb 03 1997 15:05 | 15 |
| Please try V7.1; much was done to allow opticals to work with dkdriver
although there's no RW500 here to test with. The business about the
disk reporting itself as "opt" instead of "dir" (actually, SCSI
type 7 rather than 0 as I recall) should be inconsequential except
maybe for autoconfigure.
The only "support" for non-512-byte sectors is that I *think* the
$qio access will work. Without a disk to test on it cannot be
completely guaranteed.
However I have booted VMS from a 230 MB Sony optical and regularly
use an RWZ52 as a disk (with r/w media).
glenn
|
769.2 | "happens-to-work" not equal to "supported" | TAPE::SENEKER | Head banging causes brain mush | Tue Feb 04 1997 09:58 | 26 |
| Sounds like the customer got caught in the trap of a "company needs to
make money". Many SCSI drivers of various operating systems have had
"it-happens-to-work" functionality in their early drivers, this didn't
mean that all of these functions were supported. As the SCSI business
grew and support issues have arisen, the development and functionality
of these products has changed.
Glenn's idea (.1) may buy the customer some more time, but until Digital
decides to have OpenVMS engineering support optical devices and not the
optical storage group the customer won't be much better off.
I do not believe it has ever been Digital's policy to imply that
"happens-to-work" functionality means that a device is supported.
Also, I do not believe it has ever been Digital's policy to imply
that a "happens-to-work" device will continue to work in the future.
If the customer can find some documentation that proves Digital has
wronged them then maybe you can get corrective action taken. Proof
would be something like a product description that shows the O.S.
provided support for the device.
I would like to help the customer but, and a big but, providing
software for free doesn't make money for Digital or put food on
my table.
Rob
|
769.3 | | LEFTY::CWILLIAMS | CD or not CD, that's the question | Wed Feb 05 1997 15:55 | 12 |
| If the customer needs to make the drive report as direct access, it can
be done via a mode page change. We don't usually recommend this, as the
O/S's then may have trouble figuring out what it really is. Note also
that all spares are set up as Optical.
Mode page 21h, byte Eh, bit 0 needs to be set to 1 to report as direct
access. This can be done from within OSMS, but the customer obviously
does not have and does not want OSMS.
CHris
|