T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
573.1 | A Yes cover? | WEORG::ROGOFF | Barry Rogoff, IDC, ZKO2-1/R34,381-2957 | Mon Dec 13 1993 13:01 | 6 |
| > The album opens with a snippet of the closing song, "South Side Of The Sky",
That couldn't possibly be the song of the same name from the Yes
"Fragile" album, right?
Barry
|
573.2 | | QRYCHE::STARR | Remember your mission! | Mon Dec 13 1993 13:06 | 8 |
| >> The album opens with a snippet of the closing song, "South Side Of The Sky",
> That couldn't possibly be the song of the same name from the Yes "Fragile"
> album, right?
Nope, all the songs on the album are originals, no covers.
alan
|
573.3 | thumbs up! | RDVAX::BREEDING | | Wed Dec 15 1993 13:00 | 4 |
| They are good live! I've seen them twice now and thought they were
great!
|
573.4 | | MAGEE::OSTIGUY | | Wed Dec 15 1993 14:01 | 2 |
| I'll have to check my schedule, but I think they may be playing the Old
Vienna in Westboro, forget the date, but I'll post it
|
573.5 | they get my vote | CSLALL::ONEILL | | Mon Jan 17 1994 08:21 | 5 |
| I just went out this weekend and picked up the tape. I have to
agree, it's great. I find the harmonies remind me of the greatful
dead, anyone else share this thought?
Jim
|
573.6 | pick a key, any key | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | press on regardless | Mon Jan 17 1994 15:42 | 6 |
|
>> agree, it's great. I find the harmonies remind me of the greatful
>> dead, anyone else share this thought?
Ain't no way you can all what the Dead does "harmonies".
|
573.7 | | TAMRC::LAURENT | Hal Laurent @ COP | Mon Jan 17 1994 15:50 | 10 |
| re: .6
> >> agree, it's great. I find the harmonies remind me of the greatful
> >> dead, anyone else share this thought?
>
> Ain't no way you can all what the Dead does "harmonies".
I'm confused. What's your point?
-Hal
|
573.8 | bad comparision? sorry | CSLALL::ONEILL | | Tue Jan 18 1994 07:03 | 4 |
| I didn't mean to imply they sound like the Grateful Dead, just that
they came to mind while listening to the steaks.
Jim
|
573.9 | the irony of it | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | press on regardless | Tue Jan 18 1994 12:10 | 7 |
| >
> Ain't no way you can all what the Dead does "harmonies".
>>I'm confused. What's your point?
Who says there has to be a point? Merely commentary.
|
573.10 | | TAMRC::LAURENT | Hal Laurent @ COP | Wed Jan 19 1994 12:16 | 13 |
| re: .9
>> Ain't no way you can all what the Dead does "harmonies".
>
>>>I'm confused. What's your point?
>
> Who says there has to be a point? Merely commentary.
But I don't understand what you're trying to say!
But hey, who says there has to be communication? Merely words. :-)
-Hal
|
573.11 | | QRYCHE::STARR | Take comfort in your friends | Wed Jan 19 1994 13:04 | 6 |
| >> Ain't no way you can all what the Dead does "harmonies".
I think that should read "you can call", not "you can all". Does that make
more sense now?
alan
|
573.12 | | TAMRC::LAURENT | Hal Laurent @ COP | Wed Jan 19 1994 13:22 | 11 |
| re: .11
>>> Ain't no way you can all what the Dead does "harmonies".
>
>I think that should read "you can call", not "you can all". Does that make
>more sense now?
No, not really. Does he mean that the Dead aren't harmonious? Does he
mean that the Dead don't do harmony? Does he mean that he hates the
Dead's harmonies?
|
573.13 | ;') | AD::FLATTERY | | Wed Jan 19 1994 13:27 | 1 |
| -1...........yes................../k
|
573.14 | | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | press on regardless | Wed Jan 19 1994 14:20 | 15 |
|
>>No, not really. Does he mean that the Dead aren't harmonious? Does he
>>mean that the Dead don't do harmony? Does he mean that he hates the
>>Dead's harmonies?
It's "she" and yes, I think the Dead's vocals, particularly the
attempts at harmony, are pure torture. I do like their blues
though.
Sorry to baffle you with my obliqueness. *^)
Diane
|
573.15 | | TECRUS::DEMARSE | That Lucky Old Sun | Thu Jan 20 1994 09:21 | 7 |
| I'm going to have to disagree with that....
The Dead can have some really nice harmonies....Attics of My Life is a
good example...
:), danielle
|
573.16 | | TAMRC::LAURENT | Hal Laurent @ COP | Thu Jan 20 1994 09:44 | 17 |
| re: .15
> I'm going to have to disagree with that....
>
> The Dead can have some really nice harmonies....Attics of My Life is a
> good example...
That album (American Beauty) has probably the best harmonies of any
Dead album I've ever heard. It's also my all-time favorite album of
theirs, but that's another discussion.
The album prior to that one, Workingman's Dead, also has very interesting
harmonies as far as the arrangments, choice of notes, etc. Unfortunately,
the execution is often a bit off-key. With time I've learned to overlook
that flaw, and I enjoy the album a lot.
-Hal
|
573.17 | | TAMRC::LAURENT | Hal Laurent @ COP | Thu Jan 20 1994 09:48 | 15 |
| re: .16
>That album (American Beauty) has probably the best harmonies of any
>Dead album I've ever heard.
Just to put that statement in context, I first got into the Dead's
American Beauty album during a time when I was really into Crosby
Stills and Nash and their ilk. Compared to the parallel harmonies
of CS&N, the interweaving lines of the Dead's harmonies seemed
downright mind-boggling. Just for fun some time, try to pick one
voice in something like "Truckin': and follow it through the song.
It's downright difficult to do so without accidentally slipping onto
another voice's part.
-Hal
|
573.18 | | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | press on regardless | Thu Jan 20 1994 12:07 | 9 |
|
>>...voice in something like "Truckin': and follow it through the song.
>>It's downright difficult to do so without accidentally slipping onto
>>another voice's part.
Yeah, they seemed to have a problem with it too. :>
Gak.
|
573.19 | | ECRU::CLARK | Can you picture what will be? | Thu Jan 20 1994 16:12 | 8 |
| I think it depends on whether you're talking about the Dead in the past or
the Dead in the present. ;^) I love the Dead (thanks Alice) with all my
heart, and listen to their music all the time, but their voices have
deteriorated a bit with age.
That's why Deadheads love collecting all those old tapes. :^)
- DC
|
573.20 | | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | press on regardless | Mon Jan 24 1994 13:00 | 6 |
|
>>I think it depends on whether you're talking about the Dead in the past or
>>the Dead in the present. ;^)
Me - I'm talking about the Dead. Period.
|