| Title: | OODB: Object-Oriented Databases |
| Notice: | Kit info in 2.*; Documentation info 3.*; DEC C++ port 160.3 |
| Moderator: | FUNYET::ANDERSON |
| Created: | Mon Jul 10 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Thu Apr 10 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 430 |
| Total number of notes: | 1673 |
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 158.1 | DATABS::BALLOU | Nat Ballou - DEC OODB | Tue Aug 27 1991 09:08 | 6 | |
| 158.2 | some more pointers | DATABS::OBRIEN | Tue Aug 27 1991 17:20 | 16 | |
| 158.3 | please further explain | HGRD01::NELSONNG | Tue Aug 27 1991 23:58 | 23 | |
| 158.4 | DATABS::BALLOU | Nat Ballou - DEC OODB | Wed Aug 28 1991 12:21 | 6 | |
| 158.5 | Thanks | HGRD01::NELSONNG | Wed Aug 28 1991 22:59 | 9 | |
| 158.6 | try the CDD+ group | DATABS::OBRIEN | Thu Aug 29 1991 18:21 | 11 | |
| 158.7 | CHANGE::jpk | Jim Kellerman | Fri Aug 30 1991 11:54 | 11 | |
| 158.8 | Right answer, wrong question? | DATABS::BALLOU | Nat Ballou - DEC OODB | Fri Aug 30 1991 14:29 | 8 |
| 158.9 | TLE::SCHUTZMAN | We are here and it is now. | Tue Sep 03 1991 07:40 | 4 | |
| 158.10 | Here's another citation | PHDVAX::LUSK | Ron Lusk - Digital Services | Tue Sep 03 1991 12:20 | 16 |
| 158.11 | See 134.16 | DATABS::MOORE | Ken Moore, Database Architecture and OODB | Wed Sep 04 1991 13:27 | 1 |
| 158.12 | Some questions on OO database | HANTSQ::NELSONNG | Wed Sep 11 1991 03:08 | 17 | |
| 158.13 | CREATR::neil | We are here and it is now. | Thu Sep 12 1991 07:45 | 1 | |
| 158.14 | a tradeoff -- depends on what you want to do | ERLPO::OBRIEN | Tue Sep 17 1991 18:10 | 46 | |
| 158.15 | About OO discpline within OODB | HGRD01::ALEXLAM | Sat Oct 12 1991 04:16 | 12 | |
| 158.16 | SQL in OODBs and encapsulation. | DATABS::BALLOU | Nat Ballou - DEC OODB | Mon Oct 14 1991 14:22 | 22 |
| 158.17 | This is the biggest source of pushback I get when I propose OODB | CIMNET::MJOHNSON | Matt Johnson | Tue Oct 15 1991 09:59 | 6 |
| 158.18 | Maybe you need a better explanation... | DATABS::BALLOU | Nat Ballou - DEC OODB | Tue Oct 15 1991 11:09 | 14 |
| 158.19 | It all depends on what you mean by "violating" the paradigm | CIMNET::MJOHNSON | Matt Johnson | Tue Oct 15 1991 16:27 | 3 |
| 158.20 | limitation of C++ | DATABS::OBRIEN | Tue Oct 15 1991 17:32 | 11 | |
| 158.21 | Do you mean you don't specify either public or private - or all are private? | DATABS::BALLOU | Nat Ballou - DEC OODB | Tue Oct 15 1991 18:11 | 11 |
| 158.22 | What I meant -- not what I said | CIMNET::MJOHNSON | Matt Johnson | Wed Oct 16 1991 09:25 | 7 |
| 158.23 | Agreed. | DATABS::BALLOU | Nat Ballou - DEC OODB | Wed Oct 16 1991 13:17 | 6 |
| 158.24 | Relational model will survive, but be focused | GANTRY::RUTT | Rick Rutt | Wed Oct 16 1991 20:41 | 26 |
| 158.25 | Come again? | DATABS::BALLOU | Nat Ballou - DEC OODB | Thu Oct 17 1991 09:29 | 45 |
| 158.26 | Yes -- keep SQL simple (non-OO) | GANTRY::RUTT | Rick Rutt | Wed Oct 23 1991 20:40 | 50 |
| 158.27 | I hate when this happens ... 8-] | DATABS::BALLOU | Nat Ballou - DEC OODB | Thu Oct 24 1991 09:53 | 8 |
| 158.28 | October CACM has some relevant articles | CFSCTC::PALMER | Thu Oct 24 1991 13:54 | 10 |