| Title: | DECDTM-VMS |
| Notice: | DECdtm Conference. 260.* for docs & kits. Digital Confidential |
| Moderator: | MOVIES::PLAYFORD |
| Created: | Fri Aug 12 1988 |
| Last Modified: | Fri May 30 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 353 |
| Total number of notes: | 1278 |
Hello ...engineering informed me that DECdtm uses event flag number 39. The customer's application uses LIB$GET_EF to get a free event flag. 39 falls to the range of 'initially free' event flags. Is there danger of the application getting flag 39 in spite of it's possibly being used by DECdtm already?. (Is it a prerequisite that all the programs use LIB$GET_EF for the mechanism to work properly?) This is important because the customer has reported a problem that is presumabley caused by (applictation-) RTR - DECdtm - DECnet/OSI - Rdb and we haven't been able to find the culprit yet. Regards, Juhani Ahvenainen MCS OSS Finland
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 346.1 | halt::POTTER | http://www.vmse.edo.dec.com/~potter/ | Fri Jan 31 1997 22:17 | 8 | |
>...engineering informed me that DECdtm uses event flag number 39. I really can't think of anywhere that DECdtm uses EF 39, but I'll check on Monday. regards, //alan | |||||
| 346.2 | halt::POTTER | http://www.vmse.edo.dec.com/~potter/ | Wed Feb 05 1997 15:34 | 10 | |
Juhani, Sorry for the delay in replying; I was off ill yesterday and the day before! I've checked through DECdtm and can't find anywhere that used EF 39, certainly not in the user's process. Do you have any idea of there the suggestion that it does came from? regards, //alan | |||||
| 346.3 | Thank you | EEMELI::AHVENAINEN | Juhani Ahvenainen, Digital Finland, DTN 879-4762 | Mon Mar 03 1997 13:28 | 6 |
Alan, Thank you very much for the check. I think this is thorough enough. (Excuse ME for this reply - been busy.) Regards, Juhani | |||||