T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1276.1 | Not what you want to hear! | NEWPRT::WAHL_RO | | Sun Jan 12 1992 21:46 | 20 |
|
You'll find lots of info about Disneyworld and info in the Disney notes
file. Can't remember the node.
Last May we took our 6 year old and 12 month old on the Disney cruise
and spent 4 days at WDW. There are lots of babysitting services
available - and EVERY theme park had facilities for infants. The
ponchos they sell even fit nicely over the stroller!
I'm guessing that your concern is with the thrill rides at the Magic
Kingdom. My husband and I took turns riding Space Mountain, etc..
Every other theme park was really no problem with an infant. Your 4
month old might be easier because he/she won't want to get out of the
stroller and toddle.
We all had a great time - Sorry!
Rochelle
|
1276.2 | I agree with the base noter | TANNAY::BETTELS | Cheryl, Eur. Ext. Res. Prg., DTN 821-4022 | Mon Jan 13 1992 04:23 | 30 |
| By the way, the Disney conference is on CLOSET::DISNEY (press KP7...)
There are other theme parks that are more appropriate for toddlers that don't
entail quite so much expense. All I know is the European scene but over here,
Europapark catered more to little ones.
I think you have to ask yourself what each member of your family is going to
get out of the "vacation". Obviously, the 4 month old won't get much in
any case. If you go to Disney, do you do it for yourself or for your 22 month
old? If it's for the 22 month old, it's a pretty expensive way of entertaining
a 22 month old.
There is a book which we used when we took our two boys in the high season to
Disneyworld which I highly recommend. It is called "The Unofficial Guide to
Disneyworld" and helps you make a preselection of the attractions. We used
it during high season to do EVERYTHING in the shortest time possible (requires
extremely athletic people, no food, track shoes and a dedication that still
impresses me (that I had it, that is :-) but we saw it all by 2:00 p.m. in
July.
The book includes plans for every type of grouping- couples with babies, older
people, couples with teenagers, etc. It also includes statistics on the flow
through the various attractions, where to eat, and evaluations of the attrac-
tions for their appropriateness for different ages. If I remember correctly,
I think they kind of disrecommend Disney World for babies but give lots of
useful advice if you are going with babies.
I borrowed the book from a friend who bought it in the U.S.
ccb
|
1276.3 | maybe next year | CNTROL::STOLICNY | | Mon Jan 13 1992 06:34 | 14 |
|
You know your child the best, but I have to wonder if a 22-month old
would be frightened by alot of what Disneyworld has to offer..i.e.
how did he do with Santa this year (if you do that sort of thing)?
Also, I might be inclined to stay away from Florida with my family
during "SPRING BREAK"!
My opinion would be to wait a year or two.
Carol
P.S. I like Cheryl's sentiment in .2 - awful expensive way to
entertain a two-year old!
|
1276.4 | | GRANMA::MWANNEMACHER | wuzzatfer | Mon Jan 13 1992 08:20 | 6 |
| We have three children, 5, 3, and 1. We are going to wait at least 6
years before our trip to Disney world (when the kids are 11, 9, and 7)
because we don't really think that the kids will get much out of it
until they are older.
Mike
|
1276.5 | I agree, wait | POWDML::SATOW | | Mon Jan 13 1992 08:56 | 43 |
| I don't think that it would necessarily be the "vacation from
hell", but I do think that it might be best delayed. Given that
Disney vacations are expensive, and something that you can't do
every year, I think that waiting a year or two might would increase
your enjoyment a lot.
A few additional points:
- Consider traveling with a 4 month old and a 22 month old.
There are other notes in here about that, and I don't
know how your kids travel.
- You don't say where you would stay, but also consider
what it would be like to live in a hotel with a 22 month
old and an infant.
- Consider your son's ability to enjoy the "older" stuff.
There is a potential for problems when you want to do
Epcot, and your son wants to spend all his time taking
pictures with Mickey.
- Many of the other attractions in the Orlando area, such
as Universal Studios, Sea World, Busch Gardens (an hour
or so away) etc. are much more appealing to older
children than to younger.
- To get the best airfares and accommodations, it's best
to plan well ahead. I don't think that March is peak
time (consult a travel guide), but Disney Vacations are
best planned WELL ahead of time. In fact it would not
be crazy to start planning now for March 1993.
- Your son won't enjoy it any less (in fact will probably
enjoy it more) in a year, or even five years.
It also depends on whether this is a once in a lifetime thing or
not. IMO, if it is, you should wait several years. We went last
winter. Our kids were 7 and 10. We (the adults) were able to
enjoy the kids stuff, and the kids enjoyed some of the more adult
stuff. We actually ended up spending more time at Epcot than at
Magic Kingdom.
Clay
|
1276.6 | My 28 month old didn't like it! | GIAMEM::TORTORELLI | | Mon Jan 13 1992 09:42 | 15 |
| We went last summer with a 28 month old girl and a 12 year old boy.
There was actually very little that the 28 month old really enjoyed.
She was afraid of the fireworks, and most of the rides and shows are
scarey to a very young child. Things we thought for sure she would
like, she hated (i.e., Mickey Starland Revue, the Moppets show, the
dinasaws (?sp) ride, and she loves dinasaws).
All she talked about for a long time after was that she DIDN'T LIKE
MICKEY MOUSE and NEVER wanted to go back to disney.
If it were me with two very small children I would not go.
Phyllis
|
1276.7 | Another suggestion | ASABET::MACGILLIVARY | | Mon Jan 13 1992 09:56 | 14 |
| We have visited Disney World as a couple every other year for the past
14 years. We now have a 5 month old and are planning a trip next
winter. We have always stayed in Fort Wilderness with our own RV. Next
year we are going to rent an on site trailer. I beleive this would be
the best bet for children because unlike a motel room, there is a
living room and a fully equipped kitchen. You can also get a package
deal which will include a 5 day pass to all of the parks, this way you
can visit a park for a couple of hours, go back to the trailer for
meals, naps etc. and then go out again later in the day. We did this
even with the two of us and found it much more enjoyable and relaxing
than staying outside of the park (which we did the first year) and
spending the entire day in one of the parks. The trailers are
expensive and you have to make plans months in advance, but it is well
worth the expense.
|
1276.8 | Experiment near home first! | TLE::MINAR::BISHOP | | Mon Jan 13 1992 10:02 | 18 |
| Take your 22-month-old to an entertainment that requires waiting in
line and a long attention span (e.g. the aquarium or a stage magic
show or a very popular movie). Observe his or her behaviour and
enjoyment level. Then calculate what it would be like to spend a
whole day doing half-hour waits for entertainments which last ten
to twenty minutes and are probably hard for him or her to understand.
My son is two years and three months old and has a relatively long
attention span and is fairly patient. But I'm sure he would hate
waiting in line, he would be either scared or bored by the
entertainments, and he would in any case want to go home and rest
after a few hours. I base this on our experience with the Boston
aquarium, a local petting farm, trips to the library and restaurants,
and other such family amusements.
I wouldn't go, if it were my decision.
-John Bishop
|
1276.9 | | TLE::PARMLIND | | Mon Jan 13 1992 10:03 | 17 |
| I went to Disney World this past Thanksgiving with my husband
and our 11 month old daughter and 2 year old son. I stayed at the
Disney Fort Wilderness campground - which I would highly recommend.
The trip went very well. However we brought along a babysitter.
We only brought one child at a time into the theme parks. My
daughter went to Epcot and the MGM studios. She came along with
us on the rides and did just fine.
My son only went to the Magic Kingdom. While he seemed to enjoy
himself I agree with the previous noter that it is an awful expensive
entertainment for a 2 year old. He was frightened of the characters.
Also he could not tolerate waiting in lines.
For us it was an enjoyable trip but our primary reason for going
was to spend Thanksgiving with family in Florida. The Disney
part of the trip was just an added treat.
|
1276.10 | I'd wait if I were you | CHCLAT::HAGEN | Please send truffles! | Mon Jan 13 1992 10:12 | 16 |
| I sure as heck wouldn't want to go to Disney World with a 4 mo. old OR a
22 mo. old. I must admit, tho, last time I was there I saw an awful lot
of adults with babies!!!
I was the youngest of 4 kids (the oldest was 5 yrs older than I) and my parents
took us on alot of vacations when we were young. We went to Niagra Falls,
Frontier Town, North Pole, World's Fair '65 etc. and I just have *very* vague
recollections of these vacations. It wasn't until I was about 7 years old and
we went to Montreal for Expo '67 when I think I started appreciating vacations
and actually have memories of them.
I, too, would wait a few years because they won't even REMEMBER it much less
appreciate it. Our kids are 8 mos. and 3 1/2 years and I can't wait to take
them to Disney World but won't even consider it for about 5 years!
� �ori �
|
1276.11 | DisneyLand with a 27 Month Old | SONATA::POND | | Mon Jan 13 1992 10:20 | 19 |
| I took my daughter to DisneyLand when she was 27 months. (I went to
DECUS in Annaheim and Grandma and Elizabeth came along for the
California visit.) She was afraid of some things...even things I
didn't consider...like looking at the fake whale on some kind of
Pinocchio boat ride. She liked the Small World pavillion, but was
nervous going in. She loved the carrousel. All in all, I took her
because I was there and it was free. But I would definately wait a few
years to take your kids if you want them to get the "maximum" out of
the trip.
We now have two kiddos (I was pregnant on the above trip to DisneyLand,
so lots of rides were off limit for me) and will definately wait 'till
the younger one is 4 or 5, and the older one is 7 or 8.
My experience with a 27 month old was not bad, but certainly nothing to
write home about.
LZP
|
1276.12 | Make your own decision! | SOLVIT::CERIA | Sled Head | Mon Jan 13 1992 11:21 | 15 |
| We were in Toronto last fall, and went to Wonderland (Canada'a theme
park, By Hanna Barbera) for a day. Our daughter was 22 months old then.
She loved it, she went a lot of kiddie rides, watched Yogi bear perform
on stage, ect. She still asks to see her picture riding Dino (from the
Flintstones) quite often. Wonderland is a big park, but it's not the
same as Disney. As a matter of fact, the begininng of last summer she
would have nothing to do with going on rides. Then she kinda snapped
and even rode on a real pony at ths local state fairs, since then for
get it you'll never get her off the animal or carnival rides. We are
planning a trip to Disney this spring. Also remember each kid is
different, my 3.5 year old niece is afraid to death of rides and people
dressed up as cartoon characters.
Jeff
BTW: The slower months for Disney is October-November & April-May
|
1276.13 | | MEMIT::MACDOWELL | | Mon Jan 13 1992 11:31 | 10 |
| 22 months seems a little young, but it depends on the child. We went
last year in April, the month before Katie turned 3. It was great--she
really believed that the characters were real...it was definitely a
magic experience. Jenny was only 6 months, and very easy, as she was
still "pouchable", nursing, and not yet on solids. The only rides that
Jenny couldn't go on, with Mom "pouched" were the roller coasters. We
also had three adults (Mom, Dad, and Grandma) which made it easier,
too.
Susan
|
1276.14 | Wait, definitely wait... | SOLVIT::DUHAIME | | Mon Jan 13 1992 12:24 | 16 |
| My parents first took us {ages 10, 12, 13, 14} to Disney world in
October of 1975. I must admit that we had an absolute blast and
my memories of it are spectacular.
I would not take my 26 month old there until she was at least 4 if
not 5 or 6. She still takes afternoon naps {from 12-2} and when we
went to Maine or a week last summer, we had to stay inside for 2
peak hours each day. That was the only bad part of the trip.
For the amount of expense Disney World entails, I would wait until
they were old enough to remember it, appreciate it and so that you
will be able to enjoy it as well.
{p.s. my daughter is also afraid of Santa Claus...}
-Patty
|
1276.15 | WAIT til..... | MCIS5::TRIPP | | Mon Jan 13 1992 12:46 | 30 |
| Count me among the "don't do it until at least...." crowd.
Hubby and I did Disney World early November '85, just he and I. As
adults we were *exhausted* at the end of the day. As we did this, we
observed the whiney kids waiting in line. Let me add this time of year
was positively wonderful, there were several times where literally the
lines were non-existant, rides ran half full, staff was EXTRA
attentive, and you could get lunch or dinner reservations at any of the
countries in Epcot with no problem.
We want very much to go back, but have a made a firm commitment not to
do it until AJ is at least 7, and able to understand more of what goes
on, some basic rules, and might enjoy places like Epcot and MGM more,
and be able to handle a day that starts at the park around 8a.m. and
might end around 11 at night.
FWIW, my in-laws went to DW with my sister inlaw and brother inlaw when
their daughter was maybe a year+, on the surface they enjoyed it, but
you could just read in her words "cramped our style". Maybe that's why
last fall when they went to visit them again, they "snuck off" to DW,
just the two of them on the way to Jacksonville FL to visit my S-I-L &
B-I-L. And we were the only ones who knew it, until after, just incase
something happened and we needed to find them.
Certainly, there must be somewhere closer, less expensive than DW to
take two very small children? Hershey park? Isn't there a theme park
in Virginia somewhere too?
Lyn
(who considers ONE NIGHT without child worth a week's vacation!!)
|
1276.16 | club med? | STUDIO::KUDLICH | nathan's mom | Mon Jan 13 1992 13:05 | 6 |
| What about Club Med? Another non-cheap vacation, but it was great last
year with a 13 month old, and we'll be doing it again this year...the
facilities are geared to each age group.
Adrienne
|
1276.17 | | CPCOD::SARJEF::ARRAJ | "1 taco short of a combination plate" | Mon Jan 13 1992 13:19 | 16 |
| We took our kids to Disney World a couple of years ago. My daughter was not
quite three and my son was 3 mos. My daughter had a great time. The only
complaint she had was that she didn't want to walk. So we put her in the
stroller and my son in a front carrier. He slept through most everything.
She loved almost all of the exhibits, especially the scary ones. I have to
disagree with people who say it's an awfully expensive vacation for a child
who won't remember the experience. I believe that for kids under 3 admission
to everything is free [please someone correct me if I'm wrong]. If you're
flying, air fare is free, and the hotel room additional cost besides yourself
will probably just be the cost of renting crib[s] or a rollaway if you need
them. Actually, this will probably the most inexpensive time vacationing
with children. You might be pleasantly surprised.
Happy Vacationing,
Valerie
|
1276.18 | wait | XLIB::CHANG | Wendy Chang, ISV Support | Mon Jan 13 1992 15:13 | 12 |
|
I would also wait if I were you. I really doubt that a 22 mo. old
will get much out of it. I am not sure how crowded it will be in
March. Last time I was there, I had to wait half hour for each
ride (this was in June). Most of the kids will be out of patience
with the long waiting line. Plus some of rides are pretty scary for
a 2 yr old.
I have a 3.5 yr old and 15 months old, we plan to go to DW when
the youngest is at least 4 yr old.
Wendy
|
1276.19 | Our Disney Experiences | CSC32::DUBOIS | Love | Mon Jan 13 1992 15:15 | 24 |
| Evan's first trip to Disneyland was when he was 20 months old. He *loved* it!
We went on Thanksgiving Day, and the lines were about 30 minutes long. He
didn't understand waiting in line (he kept pulling me toward the exits of
the rides, thinking we could just walk onto a ride) and he was afraid of the
characters walking around. However, he *loved* the rides, the boats, the
horses, the running around, Small World, etc, etc, etc, etc. His godparents
were with us and they had so much fun they are making it an annual event to
spend Thanksgiving at Disneyland!
We took him again to Disneyland 2 weeks ago. Evan is now 3 1/2. He also
had a really good time. The waits were longer, though, so we didn't get
to do as much.
My suggestion is that if *you* would enjoy DisneyWorld then to GO FOR IT!
Go at a time of year that the crowds are low. The advantage to high season
(like summer) is that they are open much later (and earlier) but your kids
won't be able to stay up late anyway (they will be *tired* at the end of the
day!). Stay on-site so you can go back to the hotel room easily for naps,
then come back to the park when you all wake up. The Disney notes conference
has *tons* of good advice for cheaper rates, how to handle small children,
etc!!!
Carol
|
1276.20 | wait till their older | ASABET::TRUMPOLT | Liz Trumpolt - ML05-4 - 223-7153 | Mon Jan 13 1992 15:28 | 17 |
| We planned on taking our son next year, when he would be almost 3 years
old. But we have decided to wait until he is 6 to take him to Disney
World. Mainly because I don't want to walkaround with a diaper bag and
push a stroller all day, and I want him to enjoy himself. He likes
Mickey Mouse and watches the Disney Channel all the time, so he is
familar with Disney. I feel it will be better waiting until the kid(s)
are older cause you won't have to stop for diaper changes,feedings,etc.
and you won't have to carry so much stuff with you, ie: diaper bag,
bottles, etc. I want Alex potty trained and old enough to enjoy the
rides.
I know this from experience. I grow up mostly in Southern Calif. and
spent my life in Disney Land, Knots Berry farm and every where else out
there. I remember some of it but that is because as I got older I
enjoyed it more.
Liz
|
1276.21 | they'll enjoy it if others are having a good time | TLE::RANDALL | liberal feminist redneck pacifist | Mon Jan 13 1992 15:49 | 21 |
| We took Steven when he was about 2, mostly for the sake of the
12-year-old. David might get to go this year at 2.6, along with
his older siblings and cousins.
But most of the things he had a great time with weren't the big
attractions they advertise. He sat through a long lunchtime
watching the fountain with the balloons rising and falling at the
land pavillion in the EPCOT center. He loved watching the swans
on the water. He enjoyed any ride that was slow and not too
noisy, especially on boats. (The cable cars were a big hit.)
We've been to Disney/EPCOT several times over the years, and we've
found that the older kids don't require any fewer stops than the
younger ones. But where the younger ones may need a diaper
changed, the older ones need a snack or a break.
If you're going for the kids' enjoyment, wait until they're old
enough to ask to go. But if you want to see it for yourselves,
then I think the kids will enjoy it too.
--bonnie
|
1276.22 | Another vote for Disney!!! | USCTR1::JTRAVERS | | Tue Jan 14 1992 09:22 | 36 |
| I haven't read all of the replies to this note, but thought I would
lend my own experience. We took our daughter, Kate, to DisneyWorld
when she was 18-months old (and again at 3 years old). We did not
go there the first time because we wanted to experience Disney,
but because we wanted to take a vacation someplace warm where we knew
that she would be welcome. We didn't try to see everything (as a matter
of fact we stayed on Disney property for 7 days and went into the Magic
Kingdom only one day.)
What we did was take advantage of the resort, the pool, the beach,
spent a day at River Country... The restaurants we went to were ready
for a baby, we didn't get stared at by angry tourists who left their
kids at home (as would probably be the case in a place like Bermuda).
My recommendation is to do it - but do it smart. If you're considering
staying on Disney property stay at Fort Wilderness campground and rent
one of their mobile homes - it's the same price as a hotel room and
gives you two bedrooms, living room, and a FULL kitchen. I'm not
saying prepare all your own meals (who wants to do that while on
vacation) but you would have a refrigerator for milk and juice.
There's a toaster and coffee pot, a microwave oven and a charcoal grill
and picnic table outside your door.
There are playgrounds on the property, a couple of pools and a beach.
At night there is a campfire singalong with Chip and Dale and the
little ones love it. There's a petting zoo, too. It's a very laid back
place to stay. I would not consider staying anywhere else with a little
one.
If we could afford it we would make it an annual event! In our family
Disney is very special. If you want any other information about the
campground, see the Disney notes file, or give me a call.
^_^
(>.<)
) ( Jeanne
|
1276.23 | Camper prices please | MCIS5::TRIPP | | Tue Jan 14 1992 09:52 | 7 |
| A couple people have mentioned the campground at DisneyWorld. Can
anyone post a "guestimated" price for either renting one of their
trailers, or the price if we brought ours with us?
Just doing some thinking for our future needs.
Lyn
|
1276.24 | "Approx. camping prices" | ASABET::MACGILLIVARY | | Tue Jan 14 1992 11:34 | 13 |
| If I recall correctly, the price of renting a site at Fort Wilderness
was approx. $30.00 per nite. The cost of the trailers run similar to
any hotel room at Disney $150.-$200. per nite. If you go to your site
personnel group and ask for a Magic Kingdom club, you get a package of
discount coupons for Disney and surrounding area. You will also
receive a brochure with prices and package deals. The package deals,
while they may seem expensive, include everything from tickets to the
parks to excellent meals within Disney World. Also, if you call
information, I believe there is a toll free number to call Disney World
and Fort Wilderness and call for some information from them. If I can
locate any other phone numbers/info at home, I will post it here.
Janet
|
1276.25 | Prices | CSC32::DUBOIS | Love | Tue Jan 14 1992 12:19 | 5 |
| Also, by reading the Disney notesfile, you can learn how to get deals on their
regular (really nice) hotel rooms (and on the Fort Wilderness Campground,
I think) where you can stay for $79 or $99 a night.
Carol
|
1276.26 | My Sons Experience | STEREO::CLEMENT | | Tue Jan 14 1992 12:27 | 13 |
| When we went to Disney World, my son was 26 months old. To this day,
my son, now 6, still remembers going to Disney World and the things he
saw. He enjoyed it, but if I had to do it all over again, I would wait
until he was older. We found that alot of the rides/exhibits, he was
afraid of because they started off in the dark and he didn't know what
to expect.
At age 6, he keeps asking us when we are going back. We were talking
about going with my parents in October, but now that I'm expecting
twins, we're not sure what we'll do.
Cheryl
|
1276.27 | change of plans? | GRANPA::JHAGERTY | | Wed Jan 15 1992 09:19 | 6 |
| Well I appreciate the responses. You all shared the same sentiment and
concerns that I had. I will now share this with my wife and try to
change the vacation plans. I'll keep you posted and let you know who
wears the pants in our family.
John
|
1276.28 | | NEST::JRYAN | | Wed Jan 15 1992 09:49 | 20 |
| John,
Just to add to those folks who have done it....
My almost 4 year-old son has been to WDW 3 times! - 10 months, 1.10, 2.10.
He loved it each time. We all had a great time! Not all was perfect, I
forgot to babyproof the hotel room completely. I did an Olympic-class
flying maneuver one afternoon to prevent the large lamp from crashing
down his head, and during the China 360-degree movie the train whistle
sent him up to the roof.
Consider the personality of your 22-month old - we had (have) a very
happy, content little boy - curious, gregarious, and easy to put to
sleep, feed, etc.
If your child is like this, you can go and have the same amount of fun.
Of course, your attitude is important as well, and maybe it would be
best to change plans (he said, completely reversing himself!).
Enjoy your vacation, whatever you do!
JR
|
1276.29 | 22 mos is too young | CUPMK::JETTE | | Wed Jan 15 1992 13:08 | 15 |
|
I am a true Disney-a-holic. My husband and I (and the child) have been
going every year or every other year since 1980. I took my son at age
3, 5 and 7 (and we are going this year at age 9). I have yet to take my
15 mos. old. She will not be going with us this year. She is staying
with grandparents for the week. I feel I have a great deal of
knowledge in this area and I would never ever bring a child under the
age of 3 years old and in my opinion I will not take my daughter until
5 years old - 3 was a bit too early with my son. DON'T Waste your
MONEY!
Care to talk off line - I'm at DTN: 264-5082
Kathy
|
1276.30 | 13 months is NOT too young | MCIS5::WOOLNER | Photographer is fuzzy, underdeveloped and dense | Wed Jan 15 1992 14:34 | 28 |
| If you plan to make only one visit to Disney in your child's life, then
I'd say wait.
But I took Alex to Disney World (we stayed with friends in Cocoa Beach)
when she was 13 months old, and we both *loved* it. I knew, of course,
that we wouldn't be seeing Epcot at all, and MGM studios hadn't been
built then ('86), but there was plenty to do at the Magic Kingdom for a
full day with a not-yet-walking, not-yet-talking anklebiter. I'm sure
Disney World (and -land) are still as clean and brilliantly laid-out as
DW was then; there are baby-changing (diaper) stations everywhere,
generic strollers are available and can go almost everywhere (not on
rides, but no one made off with our stroller when I left it at the
rides' gates). They post the waiting time for each ride where you can
see it before you get in line (if you have to wait 45 minutes, can't say
they didn't warn you).
At the time I went, some Michael Jackson video (yawn) was the big draw at
Epcot. Someday I'll get a Round Tuit, but in the '50s when I grew up,
DisneyLAND was what every kid wanted to see (i.e., Magic Kingdom), and
even if I'd been alone, I wouldn't have used my one day at Epcot. It
wouldn't have seemed like Disney to me!
Alex remembered it for years, and I really think she still does
*remember* some of it (Cinderella's castle, and Goofy shook her hand).
Pictures I took kept it alive for her too.
So we prove that mileage does vary....
Leslie
|
1276.31 | Very 90s | POWDML::SATOW | | Wed Jan 15 1992 15:14 | 7 |
| re: .30
> there are baby-changing (diaper) stations everywhere,
including many (most? all?) men's rooms.
Clay
|
1276.32 | A tiring vacation | GANTRY::CHEPURI | Pam Chepuri | Wed Jan 15 1992 16:37 | 30 |
|
My husband (a non-DECie) won an "excellence award" to Orlando from his
company when Rasika was 21 months old (and I was 6 months pregnant).
So we went ....
We went in March and spent 2 days at EPCOT, 2 days at Magic Kingdom, 1
day at MGM Studios and 1 day at the Kennedy Space Center at Cape
Canaveral (sp ?).
It was very tiring for Rasika. She got sick after 4 days, so I stayed
back at the resort-condo we had rented while the others (my parents and
my husband) went sightseeing. During that time, Rasika and I did
simple things - bought a bunch of balloons and went for a walk, played
in the park, etc. The funny thing is ... she does not talk very much
about Magic Kingdom (despite the home-video we have), but she does
remember the airport, the plane-ride, the balloons, the sun (it is
non-existent in Michigan in March :-) and the palm trees !!
In retrospect, I feel that we tried to see too much, she was too young
and overwhelmed by all of it. I would wait until the child is at least
5 years old and has the physical stamina to take it all in. It is too
expensive a vacation to be so so.
Despite the fact that DW is very "children-friendly", I feel that it
will be quite a challenge for you with the kids.
Just my 2 cents worth.
Pam
|
1276.33 | Tough Decision | VISUAL::SCOPA | I'd rather be in Orlando | Wed Jan 22 1992 18:06 | 97 |
| John,
I don't recall seeing anywhere in here where you mention if you've been
to Orlando/Disney. That's important to know because if you have been
there in the last two years or so you would probably have a better
feeling as to what you would want to see and what you feel your kids
would enjoy seeing.
If you have never been down there or haven't been there since the late
80's then I would seriously reconsider your thoughts on taking the
kids.
I agree with the noters in here who have discussed reasons for NOT
taking children ages 4 months and 22 months. I won't go into
reinforcing the arguments on diapers, etc. but will say that waiting
for the right time to bring your kids can make your first family visit
there a memorable one.
A child's first visit to Disney should be memorable to him/her as well
as the parents....and it should be enjoyable for the whole family.
Taking infants and toddlers to Orlando may appeal to you at first but
when you sit down and think about some of the "drawbacks" you may find
that your vacation may not be as enjoyable. Again, the noters have done
a good job in covering the types of things I'm referring to.
Many "experts" feel that the relationship between WDW and children
starts in one stage and eventually overlaps into another stage. The
first stage involves the "Magic" and that means the child understands
certain things and has no fear when dealing with a Disney attraction. I
know someone who as a little girl was taken to DisneyLand and was
frightened out of her wits in "Snow White's Scary Adventure". She feels
she was too young (3 or 4) to deal with that attraction and to this day
admits a slight fear when entering this attraction.
There is no strong feeling as to the "best" young age to bring a child
to WDW. What's important is the objective of the vacationers. What do
you want to get out of the vacation? If you feel you can achieve this
objective with your kids then by all means take them. But remember the
"Magical" stage mentioned earlier.
The second stage is that of "discovery" and "learning". Kids receive an
education in certain attractions throughout The World....and they enjoy
it....why? Well the "magic" is folded into it and nurtures their
curiosity.
Of course as parents we get a big thrill seeing our children excited
over the sight of Santa Claus, Ninja Turtles, and in this case a 50+
year old mouse. That in itself is a driving force for you and many
other parents.
I did not bring my children to WDW until I knew they could revel in the
"magic" and "discovery" stages. I am glad that I waited.
I have heard of parents taking very young children down there and
having to miss out on some things due to a number of reasons...all
related to the age of the children. In almost all cases problems with
diapers, long lines, frightened and tired little Mouseketeers made for
a less than enjoyable stay. This led the parents to remember their
vacation in a light not as enjoyable as they had imagined.
In July '90 I passed by a young boy being potty trained...OUT FRONT OF
THE MILE LONG BAR IN FRONTIERLAND. The parents did not look happy.
Then there was the Electrical Light Parade which had beautifully lit
floats that could not be seen by young children who had fallen asleep
after a long day. The ones who were awake couldn't see the floats
either.....lack of patience prevented them from finding a good spot and
waiting 30 minutes or so for the parade.
Oh yes...then there is a friend of mine who had to leave an attraction
during a show because one of his 3 year olds was screaming because the
little tyke didn't care for the show.
I won't mention the time a small child was knocked over by someone in a
character costume because the child was so small the costumed cast
member didn't spot the child...due to the sight limitations of the
costume.
I'm sure you'd get plenty of dirty looks when taking your diapered
child into Typhoon Lagoon's Wave Pool.
For what it's worth please reconsider your thoughts about going until
you recognize exactly what you want to get out of your visit to Walt's
place and whether or not your young family is ready.
Remember, WDW's Silver Anniversary occurs Oct. 1, 1996 - Sept. 30 1997.
At that time your children will be between the ages of 5 and 7. Hmmm
sounds like a "magical" age to me.
If you end up going this year I hope it meets your expectations and you
can help others make the tough decision you are faced with by entering
a trip report in the Disney Conference.
Mike Scopa
Co-Moderator
Disney Conference
|
1276.34 | Thanks for making me see another point of view... | SCAACT::RESENDE | Pick up the pieces & build a winner! | Wed Jan 22 1992 22:36 | 20 |
| I'd like to thank the people who responded to this note about taking
young children to WDW. My folks live in St. Pete, and so before
Michael was born, every time we visited them we'd take a side trip for
a few days over to WDW. My wife loves that place better than anywhere
we've ever been except Maui. We spent one New Year's Eve there that
was positively magical.
We've both been eagerly anticipating taking Michael when he gets old
enough. He just turned 2, and we were talking about taking him next
fall. Now that I've read this note, I don't think he'll be ready by
then. It's very hard to contain our enthusiasm and force ourselves to
objectively look at how Michael would view such a trip. But you folks
are right -- he wouldn't really understand a whole lot about the
attractions, couldn't go on many of the rides, would hate the lines,
and would probably be afraid of the characters.
It's disappointing, but I think we'll wait another couple of years
before we vacation at WDW again. Thanks for opening my eyes!
Steve
|
1276.35 | 4/5 at the earliest . . . | CAPNET::CROWTHER | Maxine 276-8226 | Thu Jan 23 1992 08:17 | 11 |
| We have taken kids to WDW as infants <1, at 4, 5, 9. I would say that
earlier than 4 is probably a waste. Infants are easy to handle but
they don't care and they do manage to ruin your enjoyment (somebody has
to stay with them!). The 4 & 5's are wonderful, and my son at 9 was in
seventh heaven!!
I agree with the folks who talked about the little ones getting
frightened. One thing that struck me is that they think that the
creatures are all smaller than they are (from TV) and these huge
WD characters are very scary!
|
1276.36 | Votes are in | GRANPA::JHAGERTY | | Fri Jan 24 1992 15:25 | 17 |
| Well the votes are in and I'd say the overall recommendation is to hold
off on Disney World for a coupe years. HOWEVER, we have chosen to to
go against the grain and do the following.
Spend 3 days on the beach (St. Pete or Sarasota) and 4 days at Disney.
We got a nice affordable place off the Disney grounds on the 1st floor
of a hotel with sliding doors out to a pool. Kids can sleep and we will
be close enough to watch them as we lounge around the pool. We already
have 2 day Disney passes from our visit 3 years ago, so if it gets to
hectic and we only get a few hours of Disney in I won't feel so bad.
We plan on also visiting my old college and my wife used to live in
Sarasota so we can go down memory lane there as well.
So we did some compromizing and hopefully all will be happy.
John
|
1276.37 | if you want to go, then go | TLE::RANDALL | liberal feminist redneck pacifist | Fri Jan 24 1992 16:36 | 34 |
| re: a couple back
Steve, I think if you and Pat want to go to WDW because *you*
enjoy it, you should go ahead and go. There will be plenty of
things you will all enjoy doing, and at Michael's age whether he
remembers it isn't as important as whether he enjoys it. Steven
certainly had a good time when he was barely old enough to walk.
You can buy into all the advertising hype about the "magic" of
Disney, but at bottom all WDW is is a fun place to spend a
vacation. It's a relatively expensive place to spend a vacation,
so you may need to consider whether it's worth the $$$$, or
whether they'd enjoy something else more, but it is only a
vacation.
Going with a kid who's too young to have seen the advertising, too
young to know the parts he's "supposed" to like, and too young to
stay in line (except when he's napping) gave us a whole new
perspective on a place we'd been getting a little tired of.
Steven wouldn't eat his expensive french fries for lunch, but he
would feed them to the seagull who was perching on the railing,
and the look of joy on his face every time the gull dove down to
the water to snatch another fry was worth a lot more than two
trips through Snow White. We discovered all the bushes shaped
like animals (they aren't all on the bank outside the main gate).
We found out there's a courtyard and a little ice cream stand and
a row of little shops to the right of the bridge to Adventureland,
where it runs into the colonial America section, and we had ice
cream while Steven watched the swan boats go by.
Besides, if you take Michael this year and he doesn't remember it,
then you've got an excuse to take him again when he's 4 :) :)
--bonnie
|
1276.38 | Since you asked....I would wait... | BROKE::WILNER | Ken Wilner DTN 264-6166 NUO1-1/B09 | Sat Jan 25 1992 00:14 | 23 |
| My in-laws live in Orlando, so we managed to get to Disney every year or two.
When my son was about 15 months we took him there for the first time. He was
terrified of most of the people that were dressed up as Disney characters, and
didn't even notice the rides for the most part. We saw a small amount of the
park of over one day, because there were many requisite stops to eat and change
diapers, etc...
We took him again this year when he was just over 3 years, and he had a blast.
This time he saw a large portion of the Magic Kingdom in one day, and lesser
portions of Epcot and MGM on a second day, and Sea World on a third day. (By the
4th day, he was over the edge and we left him with the in-laws while we went to
Universal.) He knew most of the characters, and was familiar with the stories
behind some of the rides. This time he really enjoyed many of the rides, but he
was scared on some of them. For example, he was frightened on both Snow White
and Pete Pan (two of his favorite stories) which had very little to do with the
stories, and for him were dark and scary.
Every child is different, but my personnel opinion is if you are going for your
child, and its a choice between going now or in a year or two, you should wait.
In a year or so, he will be potty trained, will be easy to feed, and will be
familiar with many of the characters and themes.
Ken
|
1276.39 | My 19 month old had fun | MIVC::MTAG | | Thu Jan 30 1992 14:44 | 16 |
| John -
I just got back from Disneyland with my 19 month old daughter. Granted,
some of the things she didn't care about, but she did have fun. She
loved the train ride. And in the children's area (Storyland?), she
loved the rides Dumbo, It's a Small World (2x), the boat rides, the
merry-go-round. She also met Mickey and Minnie, a Chipmonk (Chip or
Dale?), and Balou the Bear from Jungle Book. She did ok in
Frontierland on the Pirates of the Caribbean ride but definitely did
not like the Haunted Mansion. I think for the most part it was a lot
of fun and worth any trouble.. and also, because she was under 3 years
old, she was free! Oh, the Tiki Bird House was a big hit too.
Have fun!
Mary
|