[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference moira::parenting_v3

Title:Parenting
Notice:READ 1.27 BEFORE WRITING
Moderator:CSC32::DUBOIS
Created:Wed May 30 1990
Last Modified:Tue May 27 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1364
Total number of notes:23848

1202.0. "Responsibility and trust with children" by TANNAY::BETTELS (Cheryl, Eur. Ext. Res. Prg., DTN 821-4022) Wed Nov 06 1991 07:37

I had an incident happen last evening that made me VERY angry.  I would like to
start a discussion, using this incident as an example, around how much one
should trust their children and how much responsibility we should make them
feel for their actions.

My boys are 11 and 13.  We live on a dead end private road with 8 houses on it.
My husband has installed a basketball hoop on our private parking place and 
the boys and their friends use the road and the parking place to shoot baskets.

Last night the neighbor across from us called to ask me to ask my boys if they
had broken the lamp on their gatepost.  By the way, it is normal in Europe
and the case in our neighborhood to fence in your property and grow hedges 
around it so these neighbors have never had a ball from us in their garden.
The lamp in question is about 30 yards away from the basketball area.  I told
her that if they had broken the lamp I'm sure they would have told me but I
would ask them.

Of course I did and they of course said no they didn't and they weren't aware
that it was broken and none of their friends broke it to their knowledge.  I
called the woman back and transmitted this information.  She said, "And you
BELIEVE them?".  I answered that of course I believed them and I didn't see
why I shouldn't unless she had some evidence to the contrary.  She then came
up with the argument that it must be them because the other children said they
hadn't done it and that she had seen them playing ball and that was the most
logical explanation.  And anyway, one really couldn't believe children.

I told her to keep her insinuations and accusations and that I didn't intend 
to do anything about it and why didn't she buy plastic globes instead of glass
ones anyway.

I have always told my children that if something breaks, tell us so we can
fix it.  If they break something at a neighbor's, tell us so that we can
correct the situation.  Usually this has been the case and this is why I trust 
them.  For the first time my children are coming home from school to a house
twice a week which is empty.

How much should I trust them?  Can I expect them to be responsible enough to
not eat everything in the kitchen and spoil their dinner?  My husband and I
have this raging argument about how much control you place on them (bedtime,
lights out, showers, homework, etc.).  I think they should know what's expected
and need only gentle reminders (I hate shouting).  He thinks that they should
be chased after and checked up on with punishments when things aren't done.

So, finally, the bottom line: how much trust, how much responsibility, how to
help children grow to become honest, independent adults.

Sorry this got a little long.  I am still fuming.

Cheryl
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1202.1Children do what is expectedSCAACT::COXManager, Dallas ACTWed Nov 06 1991 09:3418
Cheryl,

I think that you two probably know your children pretty well, and know whether
they are prone to not tell the truth.  Go with your instincts.

As far as leaving your children at home.. my belief is that children will
basically do what is expected of them.  In other words if you have doubts about
how they will behave, they will probably fulfill your expectations.  If they
realize that you fully expect them to behave in a certain way, they will do
so.

I'll probably get attacked on this one, and it took a couple of years to
convince me that it is _basically_ true.  If you subscribe to this belief then
you have your answer - but BOTH you and your husband must have sincere,
positive expectations of your children.

FWIW,
Kristen
1202.2KAOFS::S_BROOKWed Nov 06 1991 11:0129
In general terms, we work on the scheme of responsibility and natural
results for actions.  Oh that we didn't have to chase them and lay
punishments on them, but things do not always run smoothly.

Anyway, I think you've got two problems here and your unkind neighbour
has done a good job of putting a dark cloud over the issues at hand,
thus causing you to inter-mix the two things and distrust your own
judgement of your own children.

The first is the neighbour and the broken lamp.  She's obviously angry
and has had her trust in children shattered at some point, hence her
comments.  That is her problem though.  She has to prove that your
children broke it ... it is not enough to insinuate that they did by
just saying they were children.  It is sad that she cannot trust children
to tell the truth.

Next is your own children.  You have trusted them up until now and have
had no reason to distrust them in the past, so why start now ?

You have to give them some responsibility and see how they handle it.  If
they let you down, then they have to suffer the natural consequences.  It
is up to you to lay down what you consider natural consequences for at
least some of the things that you can think of in terms of misbehaviour.
Other than that you have to 'wing it', and adjust the responsisbities 
you give them in terms of how they handle it.

You know your children.  Don't let this neighbour influence you.

Stuart
1202.3A carrot AND a stickPOWDML::SATOWWed Nov 06 1991 11:3013
I absolutely agree with the living up to expectations statement.  But I also 
think that sometimes children (and adults) don't.  I think that the 
consequences of committing some offense and lying about it, either actively or 
by concealment, should be more severe than the consequences of committing the 
offense.  

And children should understand that a "natural consequence" of lying is that 
you lose trust.  That may be difficult, even impossible, to regain.

As Stuart says, that's probably what happened to the base noter's neighbor, 
and she's chosen to generalize it to all children.  

Clay 
1202.4Your children lie but the others don't ? HmmmSSGV01::ANDERSENWed Nov 06 1991 12:3715
    
	I called the woman back and transmitted this information.  
    	She said, "And you BELIEVE them?".  I answered that of course I 
    	           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    	believed them and I didn't see why I shouldn't unless she had some 
    	evidence to the contrary.  She then came up with the argument that 
    	it must be them because the other children said they hadn't done it 
                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    	and that she had seen them playing ball and that was the most
	logical explanation.  And anyway, one really couldn't believe children.
                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    	Hmmm, sounds to me like self serving contradiction. Children are only
    	telling the truth when it fits her agenda ?
1202.5Accepting the consequences of your actionsTANNAY::BETTELSCheryl, Eur. Ext. Res. Prg., DTN 821-4022Thu Nov 07 1991 06:0127
RE .3

>>And children should understand that a "natural consequence" of lying is that 
>>you lose trust.  That may be difficult, even impossible, to regain.

Thanks for your thoughts so far.  I also found the above sentence to be 
particularly interesting with regards to my older boy (Dirk) who is very very
honest (absolutely, this is not just Mommy speaking) in that it applies in
other aspects of their life.

Dirk had some really bad school experiences which caused him to lose confidence
in what he does.  The pschycologist is helping him on this but his grades in
certain areas are really low.  He has discovered that even when he does well
on something, he might get a lower mark than is fair because of the preconceived
opinion his teacher has of him.  We're all working on this.

By the way, I don't trust my children less because of my neighbor.  I DO trust
them and feel they would come to me if they did do something like this.  But
I am saddened that she behaved like this because we have had a good relationship
in the past and she effectively put me in the situation of choosing between
ruining that relationship and defending my children's honesty.  But my kids
are more important to me than that.

The good thing was that my kids saw that I would stand by them when they are
falsely accused of something.  I think that is important also.

Cheryl
1202.6KAOFS::S_BROOKThu Nov 07 1991 11:2018
Cheryl,

>By the way, I don't trust my children less because of my neighbor.  I DO trust
>them and feel they would come to me if they did do something like this.  But
>I am saddened that she behaved like this because we have had a good relationship
>in the past and she effectively put me in the situation of choosing between
>ruining that relationship and defending my children's honesty.  But my kids
>are more important to me than that.
>
I think that if your neighbour understands that then she should get over
it in time.  It is a shame that she has little trust in children.

>The good thing was that my kids saw that I would stand by them when they are
>falsely accused of something.  I think that is important also.

Indeed that is good.

Stuart